Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Fixed-Dose Combination of Simvastatin and Ezetimibe Tablets: A Randomized, Crossover, Open-Label Study in Healthy Volunteers.

The current study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe with the reference formulation. An open-label, randomized, 3-period, 3-sequence, crossover study, including 60 healthy volunteers, was implemented. Participants received the test and reference formulation, each containing 20 mg of simvastatin and 10 mg of ezetimibe as a single-dose tablet, separated by a minimum of 2-week washout periods. Blood samples were collected for 20 time points from predose to 72 hours after the dose. The total ezetimibe assay was carried out using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, while unconjugated ezetimibe, simvastatin, and simvastatin ß-hydroxy acid determination was done via a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Each assay was preceded by a liquid-liquid extraction step. The pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis and then compared between the reference and test formulations via a multivariate analysis of variance. No statistical difference was found in under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration and maximum concentration of unconjugated ezetimibe, total ezetimibe, and simvastatin between the reference and test formulations. The 90% confidence intervals of unconjugated ezetimibe, total ezetimibe, and simvastatin natural log-transformed under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum concentration were in the range of 80%-125% as per the bioequivalence acceptance criteria. Therefore, the test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference formulation.

Statin/ezetimibe combination therapy vs statin monotherapy for carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation.

ABSTRACT: It remains uncertain whether statin/ezetimibe combination therapy serves as a useful and equivalent alternative to statin monotherapy for reducing atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of statin/ezetimibe combination therapy and statin monotherapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. Data were pooled from 2 clinical trials that used serial 18FDG PET/CT examination to investigate the effects of cholesterol-lowering therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. The primary outcome was the percent change in the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of the index vessel in the most diseased segment (MDS) at 6-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were largely similar between the 2 groups. At the 6-month follow-up, the MDS TBR of the index vessel significantly decreased in both groups. The percent change in the MDS TBR of the index vessel (primary outcome) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (-8.41 ±â€Š15.9% vs -8.08 ±â€Š17.0%, respectively, P = .936). Likewise, the percent change in the whole vessel TBR of the index vessel did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There were significant decreases in total and LDL cholesterol levels in both groups at follow-up (P < .001). There were no significant correlations between the percent changes in MDS TBR of the index vessel, changes in the lipid, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein levels. The reduction in carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation by statin/ezetimibe combination therapy was equivalent to that by the statin monotherapy.

Similar major cardiovascular outcomes between pure statin and ezetimibe-statin in comparable intensity for type 2 diabetes with extremely atherosclerotic risks.

Atorvastatin 40 mg (ATOR 40) and ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg (EZ-SIM 20) have similar reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) but cardiovascular (CV) outcomes between these two therapies are unclear. Our real-world cohort study is to test the hypothesis of pleiotropic effects of purely higher dose statin on CV outcomes beyond similar reductions of LDL-C, especially for extremely CV risk patients. Between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2013, a total of 3,372 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) admitted due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were selected as the study cohort from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by ATOR 40 group (n = 1686) matched with EZ-SIM 20 group (n = 1686). Primary composite outcome includes CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Secondary composite outcome includes hospitalization for unstable angina (HUA), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). With a mean follow-up of 2.4 years, no significant difference of primary composite outcome was observed between ATOR 40 and EZ-SIM 20 groups (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.25). Nevertheless, ATOR 40 group had lower risks of HUA (SHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.72), PCI (SHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97) and CABG (SHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97) than EZ-SIM 20 group. For T2DM patients after ACS or AIS, ATOR 40 and EZ-SIM 20 had similar major CV outcomes, which still supported the main driver for CV risk reductions is LDL-C lowering.

Effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg versus Rosuvastatin 10 mg on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging, we examined the effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. Whether the combination therapy of ezetimibe with low-dose statin is as effective as potent statin monotherapy in attenuating carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation remains unclear. METHODS: In this 2-by-2 factorial trial, 50 patients with 18FDG uptake (target-to-background ratio [TBR] ≥1.6) in the carotid artery and acute coronary syndrome were randomized to receive either simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg. 18FDG PET/CT examinations were performed at baseline and at 6 months. The percent change in the TBR of the index vessel at the most diseased segment (MDS) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were largely similar. At 6-month follow-up, the MDS TBR of the index vessel and aorta significantly decreased in ezetimibe/simvastatin group and tended to decrease in rosuvastatin group. However, the percent change in the MDS TBR of the index vessel was similar between the 2 groups (- 10.22 ± 17.49% vs. -5.84 ± 15.78%, respectively, p = 0.357), as was the percent change in the whole vessel TBR of the index vessel. Likewise, the changes in the MDS TBR or whole vessel TBR of the aorta were similar in both groups. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels improved to a similar degree in both groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin versus rosuvastatin resulted in a similar improvement of carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation, suggesting their equivalent anti-inflammatory effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02378064, 3-4-2015. /IRB No. 2015-0194.

Medication Discontinuation in the IMPROVE-IT Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although cholesterol-lowering medications can reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events, premature discontinuation limits effectiveness. Discontinuation rates have not been systematically reported for lipid-lowering trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated medication discontinuation in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial), which evaluated placebo+simvastatin versus ezetimibe+simvastatin in patients hospitalized with the acute coronary syndrome and followed longitudinally postdischarge. Reasons for discontinuation were evaluated from randomization through study end (median 71.9 [interquartile range 51.8-85.8] months). Kaplan-Meier (KM) discontinuation rates were evaluated at 30 days, 1 year, and through year 7, and compared by treatment arm and region, with Cox proportional hazards modeling used to evaluate predictors of discontinuation. Overall, 46.7% of subjects discontinued study medication (KM rate by study end 50.9% [95% CI, 50.1%-51.7%]). The risk of discontinuation was highest early in the trial but decreased with increasing time, with a terminal KM rate per 100 person-years of 8.4 (8.2-8.6) from years 1 to 7. Discontinuation was higher in the placebo+simvastatin versus ezetimibe+simvastatin arm (KM rate 52.0% versus 49.8%, P=0.049) and was highest in the United States (7-year KM rate 57.4%). In multivariable modeling, smoking, prior revascularization, hypertension, unstable angina, female sex, nonwhite race, and US location were associated with higher discontinuation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although discontinuation was highest early and stabilized to 8% per year, because of prolonged follow-up, most discontinuation occurred after year 1. Adding ezetimibe to statin therapy did not increase discontinuation risk. Geographic differences and patient-level factors should be considered in trial design and analysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00202878.

Efficacy and Safety of Adding Ezetimibe to Statin Therapy Among Women and Men: Insight From IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial).

BACKGROUND: IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial) showed that adding the nonstatin ezetimibe to statin therapy further reduced cardiovascular events in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. In a prespecified analysis, we explore results stratified by sex. METHODS AND RESULTS: In IMPROVE-IT, patients with acute coronary syndrome and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 50 to 125 mg/dL were randomized to placebo/simvastatin 40 mg or ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg. They were followed up for a median of 6 years for the primary composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization ≥30 days, and stroke. Among 18 144 patients in IMPROVE-IT, 4416 (24%) were women. At 12 months, the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline compared with simvastatin monotherapy in men and women equally (absolute reduction, 16.7 mg/dL in men and 16.4 mg/dL in women). Women receiving ezetimibe/simvastatin had a 12% risk reduction over those receiving placebo/simvastatin for the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.99) compared with a 5% reduction for men (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.01; P=0.26 for interaction). When the total number of primary events was considered, women had an 18% reduction with the addition of ezetimibe (relative risk, 95% confidence interval, 0.81; 0.71-0.94) and men had a 6% reduction (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.02; P=0.08 for interaction). The addition of ezetimibe did not increase the rates of safety events in either women or men. CONCLUSIONS: IMPROVE-IT demonstrated that the benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin is present in both women and men, with a good safety profile supporting the use of intensive, combination, lipid-lowering therapy to optimize cardiovascular outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00202878.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ezetimibe + simvastatin for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

INTRODUCTION: Cholesterol lowering treatment is mainly based on statins eventually associated to adjunctive drugs of different class such as ezetimibe. In the present review, we analysed the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of ezetimibe + simvastatin drug association. Areas covered: The bio-equivalence of ezetimibe and simvastatin when co-administrated in separate tablets or combined in a single pill is well documented. Ezetimibe is absorbed in small intestine, reaching peak plasma concentrations in 4-12 h, with a plasma half-life of 22 h. Simvastatin, ingested as a prodrug, is hydrolyzed in liver to its active beta-hydroxyacid metabolite, reaching peak plasma concentrations in 2-4 h, with a plasma half-life of approximately 5 h. The available evidence support the clinical efficacy of this drug combination, both in term of LDL-cholesterol reduction and cardiovascular risk decrease. Expert opinion: The synergistic action of these two drugs and the efficacy and safety extensively demonstrated of their association (in particular in the large IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial -IMPROVE-IT-) promote its clinical use, especially in subjects with high cardiovascular risk who need to optimize their LDL-Cholesterolemia, but also in patients who cannot tolerate high-dose of more powerful statins.

Cholesterol lowering treatment restores blood global DNA methylation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by increased oxidative stress (OS). In consideration of the well-known link between OS and DNA methylation we assessed DNA methylcytosine (mCyt) concentrations in CKD patients at baseline and during cholesterol lowering treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA methylation and OS indices (malonyldialdehyde, MDA; allantoin/uric acid ratio, All/UA) were measured in 30 CKD patients randomized to three cholesterol lowering regimens for 12 months (simvastatin 40 mg/day, ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg/day, or ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg/day) and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. DNA methylation was significantly lower in CKD patients vs. controls (4.06 ± 0.20% vs. 4.27 ± 0.17% mCyt, p = 0.0001). Treatment significantly increased mCyt DNA concentrations in all patients (4.06 ± 0.04% at baseline; 4.12 ± 0.03% at 4 months; 4.17 ± 0.03% at 8 months; and 4.20 ± 0.02% at 12 months, p = 0.0001 for trend). A trend for a greater effect on DNA methylation was observed with combined treatment ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg/day (+5.2% after one year treatment). The treatment-associated mCyt increase was significantly correlated with the concomitant reduction in MDA concentrations and All/AU ratios. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CKD patients have a lower degree of DNA methylation and that cholesterol lowering treatment restores mCyt DNA concentrations to levels similar to healthy controls. The treatment-associated increase in DNA methylation is correlated with a concomitant reduction in OS markers. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00861731).

The effect of Ezetimibe and Simvastatin Combination Therapy on percutaneous coronary intervention patients.

AIMS: Evaluating the short-term influence of Ezetimibe and Simvastatin Combination Therapy on LDL-C, TG and hs-CRP expression level in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: 57 cases of percutaneous coronary intervention patients were selected, and randomly divided into two groups: Simvastatin (40mg/day) and Ezetimibe (10mg/day) combination therapy group (observation group) with 28 patients, Simvastatin (40mg/day) group (control group) with 29 patients. Each group was treated for 10days. After treatment, compare blood lipid LDL-C, TG, hs-CRP levels with each other and the results before treatment. RESULTS: Comparison of the results of the 10th day with the baseline: LDL-C, TG decreased significantly (P<0.01) in the observation group, while the control group did not have a significantly change (P>0.05). Comparison of observation group and control group: after treatment, LDL-C and TG decreased more significantly in the observation group than the control group (-27.2% vs -14.6%, P<0.05). Whether according to LDL-C <2.07mmol/L standard or LDL-C <1.8mmol/L standard, the compliance rate of the observation group was significantly better than the control group, the results were (69% vs 28.9%, P<0.05) and (47.6% vs 13.2% P<0.05), respectively. After 10days treatment, comparing to baseline, hs-CRP was significantly lowered in these two groups (P<0.01). And there is no liver and kidney toxicity, myopathy and other adverse reactions during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy of Ezetimibe (10mg/day) and Simvastatin (40mg/day) was more effective than mono-therapy with Simvastatin (40mg/day) on reducing LDL-C, TG and hs-CRP level in percutaneous coronary intervention patients, leading to more significant anti-inflammatory effect.

Impact of Ezetimibe on the Rate of Cardiovascular-Related Hospitalizations and Associated Costs Among Patients With a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results From the IMPROVE-IT Trial (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial).

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe, when added to simvastatin therapy, reduces cardiovascular events after recent acute coronary syndrome. However, the impact of ezetimibe on cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and associated costs is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used patient-level data from the IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial) to examine the impact of simvastatin-ezetimibe versus simvastatin-placebo on cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and related costs (excluding drug costs) over 7 years follow-up. Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups were assigned to all cardiovascular hospitalizations. Hospital costs were estimated using Medicare reimbursement rates for 2013. Associated physician costs were estimated as a percentage of hospital costs. The impact of treatment assignment on hospitalization rates and costs was estimated using Poisson and linear regression, respectively. There was a significantly lower cardiovascular hospitalization rate with ezetimibe compared with placebo (risk ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.99; P=0.031), mainly attributable to fewer hospitalizations for percutaneous coronary intervention, angina, and stroke. Consequently, cardiovascular-related hospitalization costs over 7 years were $453 per patient lower with ezetimibe (95% confidence interval, -$38 to -$869; P=0.030). Although all prespecified subgroups had lower cost with ezetimibe therapy, patients with diabetes mellitus, patients aged ≥75 years, and patients at higher predicted risk for recurrent ischemic events had even greater cost offsets. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome leads to reductions in cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and associated costs, with the greatest cost offsets in high-risk patients. These cost reductions may completely offset the cost of the drug once ezetimibe becomes generic, and may lead to cost savings from the perspective of the healthcare system, if treatment with ezetimibe is targeted to high-risk patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00202878.

Early Effects of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Treatment on Plaque Characteristics Assessed by Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound.

PURPOSE: The effects of short-term intensive lipid-lowering treatment on coronary plaque composition have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. We investigated the influence of short-term intensive lipid-lowering treatment on quantitative and qualitative changes in plaque components of non-culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial. Seventy patients who underwent both baseline and three-month follow-up virtual histology intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to either an intensive lipid-lowering treatment group (ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg, n=34) or a control statin treatment group (pravastatin 20 mg, n=36). Using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound, plaque was characterized as fibrous, fibro-fatty, dense calcium, or necrotic core. Changes in plaque components during the three-month lipid-lowering treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control statin treatment group, there was a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the intensive lipid-lowering treatment group (-20.4±17.1 mg/dL vs. -36.8±17.4 mg/dL, respectively; p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline, three-month follow-up, or serial changes of gray-scale intravascular ultrasound parameters between the two groups. The absolute volume of fibro-fatty plaque was significantly reduced in the intensive lipid-lowering treatment group compared with the control group (-1.5±3.4 mm³ vs. 0.8±4.7 mm³, respectively; p=0.024). A linear correlation was found between changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and changes in the absolute volumes of fibro-fatty plaque (p<0.001, R²=0.209). CONCLUSION: Modification of coronary plaque may be attainable after only three months of intensive lipid-lowering treatment.

Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid-Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may not achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering on statin monotherapy, attributed partly to atherogenic dyslipidemia. More intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy can be considered for these patients. A previous randomized, controlled study demonstrated greater LDL-C lowering in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease who switched from simvastatin 20 mg (S20) or atorvastatin 10 mg (A10) to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (ES10/20) therapy, compared with statin dose-doubling (to S40 or A20) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10). The effect of these regimens on novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia (low- and high-density lipoprotein particle number and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 [Lp-PLA2]) was assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Treatment effects on low- and high-density lipoprotein particle number (by NMR) and Lp-PLA2 (by ELISA) were evaluated using plasma samples available from 358 subjects in the study. Switching to ES10/20 reduced low-density lipoprotein-particle number numerically more than did statin dose-doubling and was comparable with R10 (-133.3, -94.4, and -56.3 nmol/L, respectively; P>0.05). Increases in high-density lipoprotein particle number were significantly greater with switches to ES10/20 versus statin dose-doubling (1.5 and -0.5 µmol/L; P<0.05) and comparable with R10 (0.7 µmol/L; P>0.05). Percentages of patients attaining low-density lipoprotein particle number levels <990 nmol/L were 62.4% for ES10/20, 54.1% for statin dose-doubling, and 57.0% for R10. Switching to ES10/20 reduced Lp-PLA2 activity significantly more than did statin dose-doubling (-28.0 versus -3.8 nmol/min per mL, P<0.05) and was comparable with R10 (-28.0 versus -18.6 nmol/min per mL; P>0.05); effects on Lp-PLA2 concentration were modest. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with dyslipidemia, switching from statins to combination ES10/20 therapy generally improved lipoprotein subclass profile and Lp-PLA2 activity more than did statin dose-doubling and was comparable with R10, consistent with its lipid effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00862251.

Simvastatin-ezetimibe combination therapy is associated with a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events in type 2 diabetics than high potency statins alone: A population-based dynamic cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials have shown a reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) with simvastatin-ezetimibe therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The potential benefits of simvastatin-ezetimibe for patients at a lower risk of MACE are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the differences of MACE risk between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using simvastatin-ezetimibe or high potency statins. METHODS: This population-based dynamic cohort study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. The study subjects were patients with type 2 DM, aged between 40 and 75 years. The simvastatin-ezetimibe group took simvastatin-ezetimibe only, and the statin group took atorvastatin or rosuvastatin but not simvastatin or ezetimibe. The two groups were matched for age, gender, medication date, DM diagnosis date, hypertension, and cardiovascular complications. The outcome variable was new-onset MACE. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 20,485 patients (53% male; 4099 in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group and 16,396 in the statin group) were included, with a mean age of 59.1 years. In a total of 37,388 person-years, 1100 patients developed new-onset MACE. The annual incidence rate of new-onset MACE was lower in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group (2.61%) than that in the statin group (3.02%) (p=0.0476). After Cox regression analysis, simvastatin-ezetimibe use was independently associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to high potency statins alone, simvastatin-ezetimibe therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MACE in patients with type 2 DM.