Serum immunoglobulin G as a discriminator of infection in follicular lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy with bendamustine in combination with rituximab.

OBJECTIVES: Chemotherapy, including bendamustine, usually causes lymphocytopaenia and hypogammaglobulinaemia as side effects in patients with haematological malignancies. Therefore, the possibility has been considered that these immunological adverse events induced by bendamustine may lead to infectious diseases. However, lymphocytopaenia and/or hypogammaglobulinaemia have not yet been shown to have a statistically significant association with infection in cancer patients who receive bendamustine. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 27 patients with relapsed or refractory indolent follicular lymphoma who were treated with bendamustine and rituximab (BR). In order to elucidate relationships between immune-related laboratory parameters (i.e. peripheral blood leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte and immunoglobulin G [IgG]) and infectious events, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Infectious diseases occurred in 11 patients (11/27, 41%), including 3 (3/27, 11%) with severe diseases. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that the lowest IgG level during and after BR discriminated infectious events (cut-off value, 603 mg/dL) with 81.8% sensitivity and 68.8% specificity (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90). Furthermore, a multivariate regression analysis revealed that the minimal serum IgG value during and after BR therapy was the only variable that was significantly associated with infection (odds ratio, 8.29; 95% CI, 1.19-57.62; p value, 0.03). CONCLUSION: Serum IgG ≤603 mg/dL during and after BR therapy was independently associated with an increased risk of infection. The monitoring of serum IgG during chemotherapy may help to predict the development of infection in blood cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with bendamustine in combination with rituximab.

Sulforaphane Preconditioning Sensitizes Human Colon Cancer Cells towards the Bioreductive Anticancer Prodrug PR-104A.

The chemoprotective properties of sulforaphane (SF), derived from cruciferous vegetables, are widely acknowledged to arise from its potent induction of xenobiotic-metabolizing and antioxidant enzymes. However, much less is known about the impact of SF on the efficacy of cancer therapy through the modulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes. To identify proteins modulated by a low concentration of SF, we treated HT29 colon cancer cells with 2.5 µM SF. Protein abundance changes were detected by stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture. Among 18 proteins found to be significantly up-regulated, aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3), bioactivating the DNA cross-linking prodrug PR-104A, was further characterized. Preconditioning HT29 cells with SF reduced the EC50 of PR-104A 3.6-fold. The increase in PR-104A cytotoxicity was linked to AKR1C3 abundance and activity, both induced by SF in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was reproducible in a second colon cancer cell line, SW620, but not in other colon cancer cell lines where AKR1C3 abundance and activity were absent or barely detectable and could not be induced by SF. Interestingly, SF had no significant influence on PR-104A cytotoxicity in non-cancerous, immortalized human colonic epithelial cell lines expressing either low or high levels of AKR1C3. In conclusion, the enhanced response of PR-104A after preconditioning with SF was apparent only in cancer cells provided that AKR1C3 is expressed, while its expression in non-cancerous cells did not elicit such a response. Therefore, a subset of cancers may be susceptible to combined food-derived component and prodrug treatments with no harm to normal tissues.

Protective role of spleen-derived macrophages in lung inflammation, injury, and fibrosis induced by nitrogen mustard.

Nitrogen mustard (NM) is a vesicant that causes lung injury and fibrosis, accompanied by a persistent macrophage inflammatory response. In these studies we analyzed the spleen as a source of these cells. Splenectomized (SPX) and sham control rats were treated intratracheally with NM (0.125 mg/kg) or PBS control. Macrophage responses were analyzed 1-7 days later. Splenectomy resulted in an increase in lung macrophages expressing CCR2, but a decrease in ATR-1α(+) cells, receptors important in bone marrow and spleen monocyte trafficking, respectively. Splenectomy was also associated with an increase in proinflammatory M1 (iNOS(+), CD11b(+)CD43(+)) macrophages in lungs of NM-treated rats, as well as greater upregulation of iNOS and COX-2 mRNA expression. Conversely, a decrease in CD11b(+)CD43(-) M2 macrophages was observed in SPX rats, with no changes in CD68(+), CD163(+), CD206(+), or YM-1(+) M2 macrophages, suggesting distinct origins of M2 subpopulations responding to NM. Macrophage expression of M2 genes including IL-10, ApoE, PTX-2, PTX-3, 5-HT2α, and 5-HT7 was also reduced in NM-treated SPX rats compared with shams, indicating impaired M2 activity. Changes in lung macrophages responding to NM as a consequence of splenectomy were correlated with exacerbated tissue injury and more rapid fibrogenesis. These data demonstrate that the spleen is a source of a subset of M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory activity; moreover, in their absence, proinflammatory/cytotoxic M1 macrophages predominate in the lung, resulting in heightened pathology. Understanding the origin of macrophages and characterizing their phenotype after vesicant exposure may lead to more targeted therapeutics aimed at reducing toxicity and disease pathogenesis.

Bendamustine as first-line treatment in patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma in German routine clinical practice.

Bendamustine has demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab in lymphoid malignancies. As interventional trials do not always reflect clinical reality, we were interested in the treatment modalities and the outcome of bendamustine-based first-line therapy in patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in routine practice. Between April 2010 and October 2011, 324 patients were enrolled in a prospective non-interventional multicenter study. Choice of the bendamustine regimen was at the treating physician's discretion. Effectiveness was assessed by best response. Mean age at onset of therapy was 69 years. The majority (94 %) of the patients was treated with bendamustine in combination with rituximab at a median bendamustine dose of 177 mg/m(2) per cycle. Most often, bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 (87 %) at 4-week intervals over a median of 6 cycles. Two hundred eighty-one patients qualified for evaluation of response. The overall response rate was 86 % (complete response 43 %, partial response 43 %, stable disease 10 %, progressive disease 4 %). Side effects of all grades were documented for 161 of the 323 patients (50 %), most frequently affecting blood/bone marrow (35 %). Fifty-four (17 %) patients experienced side effects of grade 3 (15 %) or grade 4 (2 %), and two patients grade 5 toxicities. Bendamustine-based first-line treatment of patients with advanced indolent NHL and MCL in clinical routine practice was assessed as effective and well tolerated in our study. Response was comparable to results from interventional clinical trials.

Bendamustine, thalidomide and dexamethasone combination therapy for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients: results of the MUKone randomized dose selection trial.

There is a significant unmet need in effective therapy for relapsed myeloma patients once they become refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. While data from the front line setting suggest bendamustine is superior to melphalan, there is no information defining optimal bendamustine dose in multiply-treated patients. We report a multi-centre randomized two-stage phase 2 trial simultaneously assessing deliverability and activity of two doses of bendamustine (60 mg/m2 vs. 100 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, thalidomide (100 mg) days 1-21 and low dose dexamethasone (20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-d cycle. Ninety-four relapsing patients were treated on trial, with a median three prior treatment lines. A pre-planned interim deliverability and activity assessment led to closure of the 100 mg/m2 arm due to excess cytopenias, and led to amendment of entry criteria for cytopenias. Non-haematological toxicities including thromboembolism and neurotoxicity were infrequent. In the 60 mg/m2 arm, treatment was deliverable in 61.1% subjects and the partial response rate was 46.3% in the study eligible population, with 7.5 months progression-free survival. This study demonstrates bendamustine at 60 mg/m2 twice per month with thalidomide and dexamethasone is deliverable for repeated cycles in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients and has substantial clinical activity.

Obinutuzumab plus fludarabine/cyclophosphamide or bendamustine in the initial therapy of CLL patients: the phase 1b GALTON trial.

Obinutuzumab is a type 2, glycoengineered, anti-CD20 antibody recently approved with chlorambucil for the initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this nonrandomized, parallel-cohort, phase 1b, multicenter study, we explored the safety and preliminary efficacy of obinutuzumab-bendamustine (G-B) or obinutuzumab fludarabine cyclophosphamide (G-FC) for the therapy of previously untreated fit patients with CLL. Patients received up to 6 cycles of G-B (n = 20) or G-FC (n = 21). The primary end point was safety, with infusion-related reactions (88%, grade 3-4 20%) being the most common adverse event and grade 3-4 neutropenia in 55% on G-B and 48% on G-FC. Mean cycles completed were 5.7 for G-B and 5.1 for G-FC, with 2 and 7 early discontinuations, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) for G-B was 90% (18/20) with 20% complete response (CR) and 25% CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi). The ORR for G-FC was 62% (13/21), with 10% CR and 14% CRi, including 4 patients not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 23.5 months in the G-B cohort and 20.7 months in the G-FC cohort, no patient has relapsed or died. We conclude that obinutuzumab with either B or FC shows manageable toxicity and has promising activity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01300247.

A phase I study of bendamustine, lenalidomide and rituximab in relapsed and refractory lymphomas.

Many patients with non-Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapse or are refractory to initial therapy and require additional options. Bendamustine (B), lenalidomide (L) and rituximab (R) each have activity in this setting. This study was performed to determine the safety of BLR and its optimal phase II dose. Patients with NHL or HL failing standard therapies received B (90 mg/m(2)  days 1, 2 every 28 days), and L (escalating from 5 mg 21/28 days) for six cycles, followed by 6 months of L. At the highest dose R 375 mg/m(2) on day one of each cycle was added for patients with B-NHL. Histologies included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 11), marginal zone lymphoma (3), HL (2), and one each of transformed follicular lymphoma, Sézary syndrome, Waldenström macroglobulinaemia and mantle cell lymphoma. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity, but no maximum tolerated dose was identified. Of 20 patients, seven responded (35%), including four complete remissions, with five unmaintained responses from 28+ to 37+ months, including 2 DLBCL. BR with 20 mg l at, 21/28 days achieved durable responses; however, in light of its modest activity, and the availability of newer targeted therapies, the future of BLR is uncertain.

Phase I/II study of the hypoxia-activated prodrug PR104 in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We previously demonstrated vast expansion of hypoxic areas in the leukemic microenvironment and provided a rationale for using hypoxia-activated prodrugs. PR104 is a phosphate ester that is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to the corresponding alcohol PR-104A and further reduced to the amine and hydroxyl-amine nitrogen mustards that induce DNA cross-linking in hypoxic cells under low oxygen concentrations. In this phase I/II study, patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (n=40) after 1 or 2 prior treatments or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=10) after any number of prior treatments received PR104; dose ranged from 1.1 to 4 g/m(2). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were myelosuppression (anemia 62%, neutropenia 50%, thrombocytopenia 46%), febrile neutropenia (40%), infection (24%), and enterocolitis (14%). Ten of 31 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (32%) and 2 of 10 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (20%) who received 3 g/m(2) or 4 g/m(2) had a response (complete response, n=1; complete response without platelet recovery, n=5; morphological leukemia-free state, n=6). The extent of hypoxia was evaluated by the hypoxia tracer pimonidazole administered prior to a bone marrow biopsy and by immunohistochemical assessments of hypoxia-inducible factor alpha and carbonic anhydrase IX. A high fraction of leukemic cells expressed these markers, and PR104 administration resulted in measurable decrease of the proportions of hypoxic cells. These findings indicate that hypoxia is a prevalent feature of the leukemic microenvironment and that targeting hypoxia with hypoxia-activated prodrugs warrants further evaluation in acute leukemia. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01037556.

Results of a phase II study of bendamustine and ofatumumab in untreated indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The efficacy/tolerability of bendamustine, a unique alkylator, plus ofatumumab, a human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for previously untreated indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The study investigated whether the overall response rate (ORR) for bendamustine-ofatumumab was similar to historical bendamustine-rituximab ORRs (≥90 %). In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients received six planned 28-day cycles of bendamustine (90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of each cycle) and ofatumumab (300 mg on day 1, 1000 mg on day 8 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent cycles). The primary outcome was ORR. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability. Exploratory evaluations included percentage of patients with positive baseline [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans who converted to negative postbaseline and quality of life (QOL) scores. The treated/safety analysis population received ≥1 dose of either therapy. The bendamustine-ofatumumab ORR was 90 % (95 % confidence interval, 77.8-96.6) in 49 treated patients (67 % complete response, 22 % partial response). No patients had progressive disease. Bendamustine-ofatumumab was acceptably tolerated. All 49 patients had ≥1 adverse event, the most common being nausea (61 %), fatigue (55 %), and infusion-related reactions (45 %, all but 1 occurring during cycle 1). The proportion of patients whose FDG-PET scans converted to negative postbaseline was 88 %. Changes in QOL scores were minor. In patients with treatment-naive, indolent B cell NHL, bendamustine-ofatumumab exhibited a high degree of activity (90 % ORR), comparable with historical bendamustine-rituximab ORRs (≥90 %), and was adequately tolerated ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01108341).

A phase 1/1b study of rituximab, bendamustine, and ibrutinib in patients with untreated and relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Ibrutinib has single agent activity of 22% to 68% in relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma(NHL). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib combined with rituximab (R) and bendamustine. Patients received R (375 mg/m(2)) on day 1, bendamustine (90 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 2, and ibrutinib (280 or 560 mg) on days 1 to 28 every 28 days for 6 cycles followed by ibrutinib alone until progression. Forty-eight patients enrolled, including 12 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), 16 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL), and 17 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Patients received a median of 8 cycles, with 26 completing 6 cycles and continuing ibrutinib alone in cycles 7 to 34. The overall response (OR) rate was 72%, with 52% complete responses (CRs). By histology, the OR rate was 94% (76% CR) in MCL, 37% (31% CR) in DLCL, and 90% (50% CR) in FL. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included lymphopenia (77%), neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and rash (25%). Median progression-free survival has not been reached (95% CI, 8.7 months to not reached). The recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with R-bendamustine in patients with NHL is 560 mg. The combination has promising efficacy, particularly in MCL and FL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01479842.

Sixteenth biannual report of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group: focus on Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This sixteenth biannual report of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group highlights recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the field of hemato-oncology, with special focus on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The report covers the publication period June 2012 to July 2013. Trials are selected regarding their methodology and implication for clinical practice. Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE using a broad search filter that covers all topics in hemato-oncology combined with a highly sensitive search filter for randomized trials (Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions). Four RCTs are presented in detail, followed by two further RCTs of high importance in a short version. The report is finalized with an overview of new and updated Cochrane Reviews.

Phase I study of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors.

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation (WBR) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors. Four doses of intravenous weekly bendamustine were administered with 3 weeks of WBR at three dose levels (60, 80, and 100 mg/m(2)) according to a standard 3 + 3 phase I design. A total of 12 patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled in the study (six with non-small cell lung cancer, four with melanoma, one with breast cancer, and one with neuroendocrine carcinoma). The first two dose levels had three patients each, and the third dose level had six total patients. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies of bendamustine demonstrated no significant differences from pharmacokinetic characteristics of bendamustine in other studies. No DLTs were noted at any dose levels, and no grade 4 toxicities occurred. The MTD of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was 100 mg/m(2). The majority of trial patients died from progressive systemic disease rather than their brain disease. The combination of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was acceptably tolerated. The efficacy of this combination may be evaluated in a phase II trial with stratification by histologies.

Lymphocyte recovery is impaired in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with bendamustine plus rituximab.

The immune system has the potential to either attenuate tumor growth or to promote tumor progression. The goal of cancer immunotherapy is to shift the balance in favor of tumor immunosurveillance, so that the immune system can recognize the tumor, eliminate it, and prevent its recurrence. Bendamustine plus rituximab is generally considered effective and safe in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. To evaluate the effects of bendamustine-rituximab and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) on the recuperation of immune system, we analyze the distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and NK cells in peripheral blood of 18 patients who received 4-6 cycles of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) or six R-CHOP before therapy and 6 months after completing treatment. Our results indicate that lymphocyte recovery is impaired in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent lymphomas treated with bendamustine plus rituximab. Low CD4 T cells (<200 cells/µl) induced by bendamustine (BR) suggest prophylaxis should be applied against opportunistic infections. Asymptomatic EBV and CMV reactivations support a negative effect of BR on the immune system. If cellular immune therapy such as lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) or effector lymphocytes infusion is planned, regimes other than BR should be the first choice.

Clinical experience of bendamustine for adult Langerhans cell sarcoma.

A 40-year-old man was diagnosed with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) in October 2010. His LCH was refractory to conventional chemotherapy, and thus worsened to Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) in May 2011. Although we repeated combination chemotherapies, new infiltration of the liver and bone marrow, as well as primary lesions of the bone, lymph nodes, and skin, appeared. These intensive chemotherapies caused candida liver abscesses, invasive aspergillosis, disseminated varicella zoster virus infection and bacterial sepsis. We administered bendamustine for chemotherapy, which resulted in a partial response (PR) with no severe adverse events. Because of pancytopenia caused by secondary myelodysplastic syndrome, we stopped the bendamustine chemotherapy after two courses. PR was maintained for 4 months. We plan to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a sibling donor after a conditioning regimen. Optimal therapy for adult LCH, which is a rare and treatment-resistant disease, has yet to be established. Bendamustine is a potential chemotherapeutic agent for standard treatment of LCS.

Phase 1b study of otlertuzumab (TRU-016), an anti-CD37 monospecific ADAPTIR™ therapeutic protein, in combination with rituximab and bendamustine in relapsed indolent lymphoma patients.

PURPOSE: CD37 is cell surface tetraspanin present on normal and malignant B cells. Otlertuzumab (TRU-016) is a novel humanized anti-CD37 protein therapeutic that triggers direct caspase independent apoptosis of malignant B cells and induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of otlertuzumab administered in combination with rituximab and bendamustine to patients with relapsed, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: Patients with relapsed or refractory NHL received otlertuzumab (10 or 20 mg/kg) intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 15, bendamustine (90 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 2, and rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) on day 1 for up to six 28 day cycles. Responses were determined using standard criteria. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated with 6 patients at each dose level; median age was 57 years (range, 51-79), and median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 1-4). All patients had relapsed after prior rituximab including 7 refractory to their most recent previous treatment. In the 10 and 20 mg/kg dose cohorts, the mean half-life was 8 and 10 days following the first dose, and 12 or 14 days following 12 doses of otlertuzumab, respectively. Overall response rate was 83% (10/12) with 4 CRs (32%). The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, leukopenia, and insomnia; most were grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: Otlertuzumab in combination with rituximab and bendamustine was well tolerated and induced responses in the majority of patients with relapsed indolent B-NHL. NCI Clinical Trials Network registration: NCT01317901.

Successful treatment of refractory Guillain-Barré syndrome with alemtuzumab in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

This is the case of a 79-year-old man with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who presented with Guillain-Barré syndrome with features overlapping with the Miller Fisher syndrome and Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis and positive antiganglioside GQ1b antibody about 6 months after treatment with bendamustine and rituximab. His clinical and neurologic condition continued to deteriorate despite sequential treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, but in the end, he had a complete and durable response to treatment with alemtuzumab.

Bendamustine-induced immune hemolytic anemia in a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient: A case report and review of the literature.

Bendamustine is an alkylating agent approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There are scant reports on bendamustine-induced immune hemolytic anemia occurring mainly in CLL patients. We report a case of immune hemolytic anemia that developed after exposure to bendamustine in a 70-year-old female with CLL who was previously exposed to fludarabine. Previous exposure to fludarabine is a common finding in the majority of reported cases of bendamustine drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA), including our case. Bendamustine should be suspected as the cause of any hemolytic anemia that develops while on this drug, especially in CLL patients treated previously with fludarabine.