Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Opin Insect Sci ; 38: 92-98, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32259686

RESUMO

Invasive alien plants have a significant impact on biodiversity, crop and pasture production, human and animal health, water resources, and economic development. As most low- and middle-income countries do not have the resources to actively manage invasive plants, many have intentionally introduced biological control agents to help manage their most important weeds. Some of these introductions have resulted in the successful control of numerous weeds such as Chromolaena odorata, Mimosa diplotricha, Pistia stratiotes, and Salvinia molesta. These successes are partly due to the reliance on biological control agents that have been tested and utilized elsewhere. However, despite the successes in weed biological control to date, many low- and middle-income countries are reluctant to pursue weed biological control, due to poor perceptions of biological control and lack of capacity. This results in missed opportunities to manage many weeds cost-effectively, and in so doing, increasing production costs and a dependency on herbicides.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Herbivoria , Insetos/fisiologia , Controle Biológico de Vetores/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Araceae , Chromolaena , Gleiquênias , Mimosa , Controle Biológico de Vetores/instrumentação , Controle Biológico de Vetores/organização & administração , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/instrumentação , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/organização & administração
2.
Ambio ; 42(3): 334-43, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23055273

RESUMO

Large-scale, monoculture production systems dependent on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, increase yields, but are costly and have deleterious impacts on human health and the environment. This research investigates variations in banana production practices in Costa Rica, to identify alternative systems that combine high productivity and profitability, with reduced reliance on agrochemicals. Farm workers were observed during daily production activities; 39 banana producers and 8 extension workers/researchers were interviewed; and a review of field experiments conducted by the National Banana Corporation between 1997 and 2002 was made. Correspondence analysis showed that there is no structured variation in large-scale banana producers' practices, but two other banana production systems were identified: a small-scale organic system and a small-scale conventional coffee-banana intercropped system. Field-scale research may reveal ways that these practices can be scaled up to achieve a productive and profitable system producing high-quality export bananas with fewer or no pesticides.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Produtos Agrícolas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Musa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Agricultura/métodos , Agricultura/organização & administração , Agricultura/tendências , Costa Rica , Fertilizantes/análise , Agricultura Orgânica/métodos , Agricultura Orgânica/organização & administração , Agricultura Orgânica/tendências , Praguicidas/análise , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/métodos , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/organização & administração , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/tendências
3.
PLoS One ; 7(7): e40031, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22808088

RESUMO

We tested the accuracy of an invasive aquatic plant risk assessment system in the United States that we modified from a system originally developed by New Zealand's Biosecurity Program. The US system is comprised of 38 questions that address biological, historical, and environmental tolerance traits. Values associated with each response are summed to produce a total score for each species that indicates its risk of invasion. To calibrate and test this risk assessment, we identified 39 aquatic plant species that are major invaders in the continental US, 31 species that have naturalized but have no documented impacts (minor invaders), and 60 that have been introduced but have not established. These species represent 55 families and span all aquatic plant growth forms. We found sufficient information to assess all but three of these species. When the results are compared to the known invasiveness of the species, major invaders are distinguished from minor and non-invaders with 91% accuracy. Using this approach, the US aquatic weed risk assessment correctly identifies major invaders 85%, and non-invaders 98%, of the time. Model validation using an additional 10 non-invaders and 10 invaders resulted in 100% accuracy for the former, and 80% accuracy for the latter group. Accuracy was further improved to an average of 91% for all groups when the 17% of species with scores of 31-39 required further evaluation prior to risk classification. The high accuracy with which we can distinguish non-invaders from harmful invaders suggests that this tool provides a feasible, pro-active system for pre-import screening of aquatic plants in the US, and may have additional utility for prioritizing management efforts of established species.


Assuntos
Espécies Introduzidas , Dispersão Vegetal , Projetos de Pesquisa , Medição de Risco/métodos , Controle de Plantas Daninhas/organização & administração , Adaptação Fisiológica , Organismos Aquáticos/fisiologia , Ecossistema , Modelos Biológicos , Nova Zelândia , Plantas Daninhas/fisiologia , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA