The cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients in China.

Background: Iruplinalkib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is independently developed by a Chinese pharmaceutical company. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in the Chinese healthcare setting. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to project the economic and health outcomes. Efficacy was derived using unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Cost and utility values were obtained from the literature and experts' opinions. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to evaluate the model's robustness. Results: Treatment with iruplinalkib versus alectinib resulted in a gain of 0.843 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with incremental costs of $20,493.27, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24,313.95/QALY. Parameters related to relative efficacy and drug costs were the main drivers of the model outcomes. From the PSA, iruplinalkib had a 90% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,863.56/QALY. Conclusion: Compared to alectinib, iruplinalkib is a cost-effective therapy for patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC.

[Chinese expert consensus on iruplinalkib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (2024 edition)].

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene is one of the most common driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidemiological data showed that ALK gene fusion is detected in 9.06% of Chinese advanced NSCLC patients. ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with ALK gene fusion. Seven different ALK-TKIs have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China, including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and iruplinalkib. Iruplinalkib is a novel new-generation ALK-TKI independently developed in China. On June 27, 2023, the NMPA approved iruplinalkib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients whose disease has progressed after previous treatment with crizotinib or who are intolerant to crizotinib. On January 16, 2024, the NMPA approved iruplinalkib for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients. In order to better understand the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib, and facilitate more rationally clinical application of iruplinalkib, the Medical Oncology Branch of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care and the Chinese Association for Clinical Oncologists co-organized experts to compile the "Chinese expert consensus on iruplinalkib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (2024 edition)".

Genomic testing and targeted therapy of non-small cell lung cancer in China: a nationwide survey of physicians and clinical pathologists.

BACKGROUND: Genomic diagnostic testing is necessary to guide optimal treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The proportion of NSCLC patients whose treatment was selected based on genomic testing is still unknown in many countries or needs further improvement. This survey aimed to assess perception of genomic testing and targeted therapy for NSCLC in clinical pathologists and physicians across China. METHODS: The web-based survey was conducted with 150 clinical pathologists and 450 physicians from oncology, respiratory and thoracic surgery departments from May to September 2020, across 135 cities in China. The participants had >5 years of clinical experience in genomic testing, diagnosis or treatment of NSCLC. RESULTS: Clinical pathologists reported capability of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS-1) testing as 95.3%, 94.7%, and 84.7%, respectively, but only 81.9%, 75.5%, and 65.6% of physicians believed that the pathology department of the hospital is capable of performing the testing. The proportions of sending out specimens for testing were 21.0% and 49.7% as reported from clinical pathologists and physicians, respectively. Testing for EGFR mutation was recommended by physicians most often, followed by ALK and ROS-1 rearrangement. As first-line treatment, among the newly diagnosed patients with EGFR mutation, 77% received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy (49% treated with gefitinib); among patients with ALK rearrangement, 71% received TKI (64% treated with crizotinib); among patients with ROS-1 fusion, 65% received TKI (88% treated with crizotinib). CONCLUSIONS: The improvement of the non-tertiary hospital pathology departments' detection capabilities and the physicians' awareness are needed for enhancing the rate of genomic testing and targeted therapy in NSCLC patients in China.

Overall survival and central nervous system activity of crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged lung cancer-final results of the EUCROSS trial.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, we reported the first efficacy and safety analysis of EUCROSS, a phase II trial investigating crizotinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer. At that time, overall survival (OS) was immature and the effect of crizotinib on intracranial disease control remained unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of OS, systemic and intracranial activity, and the impact of co-occurring aberrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EUCROSS was a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and efficacy in pre-defined subgroups. RESULTS: Median OS of the intention-to-treat population (N = 34) was 54.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.3 months-not reached (NR); median follow-up 81.4 months] and median all-cause PFS of the response-evaluable population (N = 30) was 19.4 months (95% CI 10.1-32.2 months). Time on treatment was significantly correlated with OS (R = 0.82; P < 0.0001). Patients with co-occurring TP53 aberrations (28%) had a significantly shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 11; 95% CI 2.0-56.0; P = 0.006] and all-cause PFS (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-15; P = 0.025). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement at baseline (N = 6; 20%) had a numerically shorter median OS and all-cause PFS. Median intracranial PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.7 months-NR) and the rate of isolated CNS progression was 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Our final analysis proves the efficacy of crizotinib in ROS1-positive lung cancer, but also highlights the devastating impact of TP53 mutations on survival and treatment efficacy. Additionally, our data show that CNS disease control is durable and the risk of CNS progression while on crizotinib treatment is low.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1+) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are highly sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments. However, acquired TKI resistance remains the major hurdle preventing patients from experiencing prolonged benefits. METHODS: 107 advanced or metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC patients who progressed on crizotinib and lorlatinib were recruited. Tissue and plasma samples were collected at baseline (N = 50), postcrizotinib (N = 91), and postlorlatinib (N = 21), which were all subject to the 139-gene targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Molecular dynamics modeling was performed to investigate the effects of ROS1 mutations on binding to different TKIs. RESULTS: In patients with postcrizotinib and postlorlatinib samples, an accumulation of on- and off-target resistance alterations after multiple TKI treatments was observed. ROS1 G2032R and MET amplification were the most common on-target and off-target alterations, respectively. Patients with CD74-ROS1 and SLC34A2-ROS1 had longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001) and higher rates of resistance mutations (on-target, P = 0.001; off-target, P = 0.077) than other ROS1 fusion variants following crizotinib treatment. Ten distinct on-target resistance mutations were detected after TKI therapies, of which 4 were previously unreported (ROS1 L2010M, G1957A, D1988N, L1982V). Molecular dynamics simulations showed that all 4 mutations were refractory to crizotinib, while G1957A, D1988N, and L1982V were potentially sensitive to lorlatinib and entrectinib. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a comprehensive portrait of TKI-resistance mechanisms in ROS1+ NSCLC patients. Using in silico simulations of TKI activity, novel secondary mutations that may confer TKI resistance were identified and may support clinical therapeutic decision-making.

Identifying optimal ALK inhibitors in first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety and effects on quality of life of different ALK-inhibitors for global and Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The included RCTs were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, and major cancer conferences. The assessment of progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS, overall survival (OS), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was carried out using restricted mean survival time (RMST) model, fractional polynomial model and Royston-Parmar model. Time-invariant hazard ratio (HR) models were also used to validate and supplement the primary analysis. Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events with any grade, grade 3-5 were assessed through a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary measures for OS, PFS, and PROs were HR and RMST. The odds ratio was the metric for evaluating safety, ORR, 12-month PFS rate, 24-month OS rate, and the 12-month non-deterioration rate of PROs. Subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics were performed. RESULTS: A total of fourteen studies (ten for first-line, four for second-line) consisting of nine treatments (chemotherapy, crizotinib, alectinib [600mg BID], low-dose alectinib [300mg BID], brigatinib, ceritinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, and lorlatinib) were included. In the first-line setting, alectinib showed a significant advantage over crizotinib and had the longest OS among all ALK-inhibitors. Compared to crizotinib, lorlatinib had the best efficacy regarding PFS for global patients, followed closely by alectinib and brigatinib. For Asian patients, alectinib significantly improved PFS compared to other treatments. In second-line, alectinib had the highest PFS for patients pretreated with crizotinib, followed by brigatinib, ceritinib and chemotherapy. Alectinib, irrespective of the dose, was the safest first-line option, whereas lorlatinib, brigatinib, and ceritinib showed poorer safety profiles. Alectinib was also the safest ALK-inhibitor for crizotinib-resistant patients. Brigatinib had the best performance in terms of PROs. CONCLUSIONS: Considering both efficacy and safety, alectinib appears to be the preferable treatment in first-line and second-line, particularly for Asian patients.

Case report: The utilization of crizotinib and brentuximab vedotin as a bridge to autologous stem cell transplantation and followed by CD30-directed CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory ALK+ ALCL.

Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+ ALCL) is a rare, mature T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory ALCL following first-line chemotherapy is extremely poor. NCCN guidelines recommend intensified chemotherapy with or without ASCT consolidation for r/r ALCL, however, this is not an effective treatment for all ALK+ALCL. Case report: Herein, we report a patient with relapsed/refractory ALK+ ALCL who received crizotinib and brentuximab vedotin as bridging therapy, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and sequential anti-CD30 CAR T cell therapy. Conclusion: The patient achieved complete remission and long-term disease-free survival of months and continues to be followed up. The combination therapy model in this case may provide guidance for the management of relapsed/refractory ALK+ ALCL, and further prospective trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness.

Economic Evaluation of Targeted Therapies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase- and ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in India.

PURPOSE: Targeted therapies, such as crizotinib and ceritinib, have shown promising results in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific oncogenic drivers like anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros (ROS1) oncogene, etc. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of these therapies for patients with NSCLC in India. METHODS: The Markov model consisted of three health states: progression-free survival, progressive disease, and death. Lifetime costs and consequences were estimated for three treatment arms: crizotinib, ceritinib, and chemotherapy for patients with ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with crizotinib and ceritinib was compared to chemotherapy and assessed using a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time per capita gross domestic product in India. RESULTS: The total lifetime cost per patient for ALK-positive NSCLC was ₹332,456 ($4,054 US dollars [USD]), ₹1,284,100 ($15,659 USD), and ₹2,337,779 ($28,509 USD) in the chemotherapy, crizotinib, and ceritinib arms, respectively. The mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.20, 2.21, and 3.34, respectively. For patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC, the total cost was ₹323,011 ($3,939 USD) and ₹1,763,541 ($21,507 USD) for chemotherapy and crizotinib, with mean QALYs lived per patient of 1.16 and 2.73, respectively. Nearly 92% and 81% reduction in the price of ceritinib and crizotinib is required to make it a cost-effective treatment option for ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study findings suggest that the prices of ceritinib and crizotinib need to be reduced significantly to justify their value for inclusion in India's publicly financed health insurance scheme for treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC, respectively.

The lack of head-to-head randomised trials and the consequences for patients and national health service: The case of non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To introduce a drug to the market, it's not mandatory for it to be more effective and safer than the current treatment for the same condition. Consequently, head-to-head studies between the two best treatments for the same condition are not required, and this could result in a lack of information for patients, clinicians, and decision-makers. This study aims to evaluate the presence of head-to-head studies among the drugs used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Taking into account the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines updated to 2022, which list all available treatments for each NSCLC subtype, the search engine Pubmed and the platform clinicaltrials.gov were consulted to find all completed and ongoing head-to-head studies among various treatments for NSCLC. RESULTS: Among the anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) drugs, 7 studies were found, with 6 completed and 5 registrational for drug commercialisation. No completed study to date has compared osimertinib and afatinib. For anti-ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) drugs, 7 studies were found, with 5 completed. Alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib have no completed comparison studies, but all were compared with crizotinib. Among various immunotherapy-based regimens, 5 studies were found, with only 1 completed. Therapeutic regimens based on pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or the combination of nivolumab/ipilimumab have not been compared in studies published to date. CONCLUSION: There are few head-to-head studies comparing treatments for NSCLC; there are no such studies between the latest generation of drugs. Consequently, ambiguous areas exist due to the lack of comparative studies among the available evidence, preventing the clinician's choice of the most effective treatment and risking the patient receiving suboptimal therapy. Simultaneously, the price of the drug cannot be determined correctly, relying only on indirect evaluations from different trials. To dispel this uncertainty, it would be desirable to initiate a process that brings together the demands derived from clinical practice and clinical research to provide clinicians and patients with the best possible evidence.

Real-world outcome of crizotinib for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer: Multicenter retrospective analysis in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: About 3%-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents positive anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Recently, several target agents have been approved as a treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. This study aimed to analyze the real-world efficacy and outcome when administered crizotinib, the first approved target agent for ALK-positive NSCLC, according to first- or late-line treatment. METHODS: A total of 290 patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were treated with crizotinib in 15 institutions in South Korea from January 2009 to December 2018 were enrolled. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 57.0 years, and 50.3% were male. The median follow-up duration was 29.3 months. Among them, 113 patients received crizotinib as first-line therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60.1% (57.0% for first-line recipients, 61.8% for second-/later-line). Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 (11.6-17.0) months. For first-line recipients, overall survival (OS) was 26.3 (17.6-35.0) months. No significant difference in ORR, PFS and OS, according to the setting of crizotinib initiation, was observed. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, old age, male gender, initially metastatic, and number of metastatic organs were associated with poor PFS and OS. The most common adverse events were nausea and vomiting, and severe adverse event leading to dose adjustment was hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: ORR, PFS, OS, and adverse event profiles were comparable to previous clinical trials. Our findings could aid in the efficient management of ALK-positive lung cancer patients.

CD74/SLC34A2-ROS1 Fusion Variants Involving the Transmembrane Region Predict Poor Response to Crizotinib in NSCLC Independent of TP53 Mutations.

INTRODUCTION: Variable partners and breakpoints have been reported in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Here, we investigated the association of fusion partners and breakpoints with crizotinib efficacy in NSCLCs with common ROS1 fusions. METHODS: DNA and RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry were performed to characterize ROS1 fusions. RESULTS: Using DNA NGS, we identified ROS1 fusions in 210 cases, comprising 171 common (CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4/SLC34A2-ROS1) and 39 uncommon (variants identified in <5%) ROS1 fusion cases. DNA NGS detected variable ROS1 genomic breakpoints in common ROS1 fusions, whereas RNA NGS found ROS1 breakpoints mainly occurring in exons 32, 34 and 35, resulting in long (exon 32) and short (exon 34 or 35) ROS1 fusions. ROS1 immunohistochemistry revealed that membranous and cytoplasmic staining was predominant in long ROS1 fusions, whereas cytoplasmic staining was predominant in short ROS1 fusions (p = 0.006). For patients who received first-line crizotinib, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was lower in patients with long ROS1 fusions than those with short ROS1 fusions (8.0 versus 24.0 mo, p = 0.006). Moreover, mPFS for patients with and without TP53 mutations was 8.0 and 19.0 months, respectively (p = 0.159); mPFS for patients with and without BIM deletion polymorphism was 5.0 and 22.0 months, respectively (p = 0.003). When analyzing together with fusion partners, patients with long CD74/SLC34A2-ROS1 fusions were found to have shorter PFS than those with other ROS1, regardless of the presence or absence of TP53 mutations (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Long CD74/SLC34A2-ROS1 fusions, which retain transmembrane regions in ROS1 and fusion partners, are associated with poor response to crizotinib independent of TP53 mutations.

Lorlatinib as a first-line treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Α cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib compared to 1st generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) TKI crizotinib, and 2nd generation TKIs alectinib and brigatinib, for previously untreated patients with ALK+ advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC). METHODS: A partitioned survival model was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical, safety and utility data were extracted from literature. Direct medical costs reflecting the year 2023 were included in the analysis (€). Model outcomes were patients' life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: Total cost per patient with lorlatinib, alectinib, crizotinib, and brigatinib was estimated to be €188,205, €183,343, €75,028, and €145,454 respectively. Lorlatinib appeared to yield more LYs and QALYs gained versus alectinib, crizotinib, and brigatinib. Hence, lorlatinib resulted in ICERs of €4,315 per LY gained and €4,422 per QALY gained compared to alectinib, €34,032 per LY gained and €48,256 per QALY gained versus crizotinib and €16,587 per LY gained and €26,271 per QALY gained compared to brigatinib. CONCLUSION: Lorlatinib provides substantial clinical benefit and appears to be a cost - effective treatment option compared to 1st and 2nd generation TKIs for previously untreated patients with ALK+ aNCSLC in Greece.

Different effects of crizotinib treatment in two non-small cell lung cancer patients with SDC4::ROS1 fusion variants.

The possibility of stratifying patients according to differences in ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion partners has been discussed. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological differences between two SDC4::ROS1 positive NSCLC cases who had different responses to crizotinib. Cytology and pathology samples from two NSCLC cases with SDC4::ROS1 who were diagnosed and treated with crizotinib at Nihon University Itabashi Hospital were obtained. Case 1 has been well-controlled with crizotinib for over 5 years, but case 2 was worse and overall survival was 19 months. Sequencing analysis of ROS1 fusion genes was performed by reverse-transcription-PCR and Sanger's sequencing methods. In addition, thyroid transcription factor (TTF)-1, ROS-1, Ki67, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK)1/2 expression were investigated using immunohistochemistry. Sequencing analysis showed SDC4 exon2::ROS1 exon 32 (exon33 deleted) in case 1, and coexistence of SDC4 exon2::ROS1 exon 34 and SDC4 exon2::ROS1 exon35 in case 2. The Ki67 index was not different, but ROS1 and pERK1/2 expression levels tended to be higher in the tumor cells of case 2 than in case 1. Therapeutic response to crizotinib and patients' prognosis in ROS1 rearranged NSCLC may be related to the activation of ROS1 signaling, depending on ROS1 and pERK1/2 overexpression status, even if the ROS1 fusion partner is the same.

Establishing Meaningful Change Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in ALTA-1L Trial.

OBJECTIVES: An earlier study from the ALTA-1L trial of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer demonstrated that brigatinib produces superior health-related quality of life (QoL) outcomes over crizotinib. This study aimed to derive meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) for European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13 to refine the earlier results. METHODS: Patients from the ALTA-1L trial were administered the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaires. Responses were analyzed using anchor-based analysis, graphical analysis, distribution-based analysis, longitudinal responder analysis, and time to deterioration. RESULTS: The patient-reported outcome population comprised 262 patients who completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and at least 1 follow-up timepoint. Both anchors (QLQ-C30 items for overall health and QoL) had correlations >0.40 or < -0.40 with all functioning domains, fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and all dyspnea scores. Within-group analysis for most scales found the derived MCT was consistent with a cutoff of 10 points for classifying individual-patient change, except for 3-item dyspnea. The probability of improvement/remaining stable was significantly greater in the brigatinib group over crizotinib for the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning, appetite loss, and constipation domains. CONCLUSIONS: This study derived MCTs for EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 domains that may be applied in future studies and again demonstrated the superiority of brigatinib over crizotinib in health-related QoL outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinical Relevance of High Plasma Trough Levels of the Kinase Inhibitors Crizotinib, Alectinib, Osimertinib, Dabrafenib, and Trametinib in NSCLC Patients.

BACKGROUND: the study aims to evaluate whether high plasma trough levels of the kinase inhibitors (K.I.s) crizotinib, alectinib, osimertinib, dabrafenib, and trametinib were associated with a higher risk of toxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with the selected K.I.s were included if at least one plasma trough level at steady state (C min,ss ) was available. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and laboratory databases. The high group for each K.I. was defined as 10% of patients with the highest first C min,ss . The remaining patients were placed in the non-high group. The frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), defined as adverse events leading to dose reduction, dose interruption, or permanent discontinuation, was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients were included in the different K.I. groups. A high C min,ss of crizotinib (n = 96), alectinib (n = 105), osimertinib (n = 227), dabrafenib (n = 52), and trametinib (n = 62) correlated with a C min,ss ≥490, ≥870, ≥405, ≥150, and ≥25 ng/mL, respectively. DLTs were more common in the alectinib high group than in the alectinib non-high group (64% vs. 29%, P = 0.036). Liver toxicity was observed in 4 (36%) patients in the high group and 5 (5%) patients in the non-high group ( P = 0.007). For other K.I.s, no significant differences were observed in the frequency of DLTs between the high and non-high groups. CONCLUSIONS: For alectinib, high C min,ss was correlated with a higher risk of DLT. No differences in the frequency of DLTs were observed between the high and non-high groups for crizotinib, osimertinib, dabrafenib, and trametinib.

Globe Salvage and Vision Preservation by Neoadjuvant Darovasertib and Crizotinib in Uveal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: To report the effective use of neoadjuvant darovasertib and crizotinib in a patient with a large uveal melanoma (UM) in his only functional eye. DESIGN: Case report. SUBJECTS: One patient with T4b UM. INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant darovasertib and crizotinib, followed by plaque brachytherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective tumor response and conversion from planned enucleation to placement of fovea- and optic nerve-sparing plaque brachytherapy. RESULTS: A patient with a history of left eye blindness from retinal artery occlusion presented with rapidly declining right eye vision due to a primary UM measuring 18 mm in maximal diameter and 16.5 mm in maximal thickness. To salvage vision, neoadjuvant treatment was initiated using darovasertib and crizotinib. After 6 months of neoadjuvant treatment, which included intraocular lens replacement for tumor-associated cataract, the tumor regressed to 14.1 mm in maximal diameter and 2.6 mm in maximal thickness, enabling treatment with plaque brachytherapy rather than enucleation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of darovasertib and crizotinib for UM is an effective neoadjuvant strategy that warrants further investigation as an approach to improve visual outcomes from the treatment of primary UM. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The other authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Successful Crizotinib-targeted Therapy of Pediatric Unresectable ERC1::ALK Fusion Sarcoma.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK )-fusion sarcomas are rare part of the emerging theoretically targetable tyrosine kinase RAS::MAPK pathway fusion myopericytic-ovoid sarcomas. We report our clinicopathologic and treatment experience with an ALK fusion sarcoma. A novel ELKS/RAB6-interacting/CAST family member 1 - unaligned ALK fusion infiltrative nonmetastatic low-grade sarcoma of the right hand of a 15-month-old male was treated with crizotinib, an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor as oral monotherapy, inducing complete radiographic and clinical resolution by 10 months and sustained response now over 12 months after elective discontinuation. Crizotinib can successfully be used to treat unresectable novel ALK fusion sarcomas.

CD74-ROS1 L2026M mutant enhances autophagy through the MEK/ERK pathway to promote invasion, metastasis and crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring a proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion gene has greatly benefited from the use of crizotinib. However, drug resistance inevitably occurs after 1 year of treatment. Clinical studies have shown that patients with an L2026M mutation in the ROS1 kinase domain account for about 6% of the total number of crizotinib-resistant cases, which is an important group that cannot be ignored. To explore the mechanism involved, we constructed the HLA class II histocompatibility antigen gamma chain (CD74)-ROS1 L2026M mutant gene by fusion polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and transfected it into H460 and A549 cells. We found that the invasion and metastasis abilities of drug-resistant cells were increased. The results of monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining, Acridine orange (AO) staining, and western blot indicated that the autophagy level of CD74-ROS1 L2026M mutant NSCLC cells was increased compared with the CD74-ROS1 group, and the inhibition of autophagy could reverse the increased invasion and metastasis abilities caused by the L2026M mutation. In addition, the L2026M mutation led to excessive activation of the MEK/ERK pathway, and MEK inhibitors could reduce the autophagy level, invasion, and metastasis abilities of cells; additionally, this process could be blocked by rapamycin, an activator of autophagy. Furthermore, crizotinib treatment activated expression of Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-2 (SHP2; also known as PTPN11) to upregulate the MEK/ERK pathway, and the combination of MEK inhibitors and crizotinib increased apoptosis compared with crizotinib alone. In conclusion, our results indicate that the MEK/ERK pathway mediates the induction of invasion, metastasis, and crizotinib resistance through autophagy caused by CD74-ROS1 L2026M mutation in NSCLC cells, and targeting MEK could reverse these processes.

Management strategies for intracranial progression in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world cohort study.

PURPOSE: ALK-positive NSCLC patients exhibit a particularly high propensity for the development of brain metastases. Current guidelines suggest transit to next-line therapy (SysTx) or local radiotherapy (RadTx) including whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery. However, the clinical impact of these two strategies remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis focusing on patients with stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent first-line ALK TKI treatment. Patients with intracranial progression may receive two different treatment strategies: SysTx and RadTx. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes associated with these two distinct treatment pathways. RESULTS: A total 20 patients of ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line ALK TKI therapy and subsequently developed intracranial progression were enrolled. About 55% of patients had brain metastasis initially. Nine patients (45%) were treated with crizotinib at first. Patients treated with crizotinib demonstrated a significantly shorter intracranial PFS1 (crizotinib: 8.27 months vs. others: 27.0 months, p = 0.006). Following intracranial progression, approximately 60% of patients transitioned to the next line of systemic treatment (SysTx), while the remaining 40% opted for local cranial radiotherapy (RadTx). Intriguingly, our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in intracranial progression-free survival (PFS2) between these two distinct treatment strategies. (SysTx: 20.87 months vs. RadTx: 28.23 months, p = 0.461). CONCLUSION: The intracranial progression-free survival showed no difference between the two strategies suggesting that both local radiotherapy and systemic therapy may be valid options. Individualized strategy, molecular analysis, and multidisciplinary conferences may all play a pivotal role in decision-making.