Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 869
Filtrar
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 33(6): 107663, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432489

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is a common cause of mortality in the United States. However, the economic burden of stroke on the healthcare system is not well known. In this study, we aim to calculate the annual cumulative and per-patient cost of stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). We calculate annual trends in cost for stroke patients from 2006 to 2019. A multivariate linear regression with patient characteristics (e.g. age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index) as covariates was used to identify factors for higher costs. RESULTS: In this study time-period, 2,998,237 stroke patients presented to the ED and 2,481,171 (83 %) were admitted. From 2006 to 2019, the cumulative ED cost increased by a factor of 7.0 from 0.49 ± 0.03 to 3.91 ± 0.16 billion dollars (p < 0.001). The cumulative inpatient (IP) cost increased by a factor of 2.7 from 14.42 ± 0.78 to 37.06 ± 2.26 billion dollars (p < 0.001. Per-patient ED charges increased by a factor of 3.0 from 1950 ± 64 to 7818 ± 260 dollars (p < 0.001). Per-patient IP charges increased by 89 % from 40.22 +/- 1.12 to 76.06 ± 3.18 thousand dollars (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Strokes place an increasing financial burden on the US healthcare system. Certain patient demographics including age, male gender, more comorbidities, and insurance type were significantly associated with increased cost of care.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Custos Hospitalares , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Preços Hospitalares/tendências , Comorbidade , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Admissão do Paciente/tendências
2.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260127, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843530

RESUMO

Sepsis, an important and preventable cause of death in the newborn, is associated with high out of pocket hospitalization costs for the parents/guardians. The government of Nepal's Free Newborn Care (FNC) service that covers hospitalization costs has set a maximum limit of Nepalese rupees (NPR) 8000 i.e. USD 73.5, the basis of which is unclear. We aimed to estimate the costs of treatment in neonates and young infants fulfilling clinical criteria for sepsis, defined as clinical severe infection (CSI) to identify determinants of increased cost. This study assessed costs for treatment of 206 infants 3-59 days old, enrolled in a clinical trial, and admitted to the Kanti Children's Hospital in Nepal through June 2017 to December 2018. Total costs were derived as the sum of direct costs for bed charges, investigations, and medicines and indirect costs calculated by using work time loss of parents. We estimated treatment costs for CSI, the proportion exceeding NPR 8000 and performed multivariable linear regression to identify determinants of high cost. Of the 206 infants, 138 (67%) were neonates (3-28 days). The median (IQR) direct costs for treatment of CSI in neonates and young infants (29-59 days) were USD 111.7 (69.8-155.5) and 65.17 (43.4-98.5) respectively. The direct costs exceeded NPR 8000 (USD 73.5) in 69% of neonates with CSI. Age <29 days, moderate malnutrition, presence of any sign of critical illness and documented treatment failure were found to be important determinants of high costs for treatment of CSI. According to this study, the average treatment cost for a newborn with CSI in a public tertiary level hospital is substantial. The maximum limit offered for free newborn care in public hospitals needs to be revised for better acceptance and successful implementation of the FNC service to avert catastrophic health expenditures in developing countries like Nepal. Trial Registration: CTRI/2017/02/007966 (Registered on: 27/02/2017).


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Honorários e Preços/estatística & dados numéricos , Governo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Nepal , Sepse/economia
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 76: 269-275, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of death worldwide, with carotid atherosclerosis accounting for 10-20% of cases. In Brazil, the Public Health System provides care for roughly two-thirds of the population. No studies, however, have analysed large-scale results of carotid bifurcation surgery in Brazil. METHODS: This study aimed to describe rates of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed between 2008 and 2019 in the country through web scraping of publicly available databases. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, 37,424 carotid bifurcation revascularization procedures were performed, of which 22,578 were CAS (60.34%) and 14,846 (39.66%) were CEA. There were 620 in-hospital deaths (1.66%), 336 after CAS (1.48%) and 284 after CEA (1.92%) (P = 0.032). Governmental reimbursement was US$ 77,216,298.85 (79.31% of all reimbursement) for CAS procedures and US$ 20,143,009.63 (20.69%) for CEA procedures. The average cost per procedure for CAS (US$ 3,062.98) was higher than that for CEA (US$ 1,430.33) (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, the frequency of CAS largely surpassed that of CEA. In-hospital mortality rates of CAS were significantly lower than those of CEA, although both had mortality rates within the acceptable rates as dictated by literature. The cost of CAS, however, was significantly higher. This is a pioneering analysis of carotid artery disease management in Brazil that provides, for the first time, preliminary insight into the fact that the low adoption of CEA in the country is in opposition to countries where utilization rates are higher for CEA than for CAS.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Saúde Pública/tendências , Stents/tendências , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/economia , Estenose das Carótidas/mortalidade , Redução de Custos/tendências , Análise Custo-Benefício/tendências , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Saúde Pública/economia , Pesquisa em Sistemas de Saúde Pública , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(8): 1101-1109, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058109

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New cases of COVID-19 continue to occur daily in the United States, and the need for medical treatments continues to grow. Knowledge of the direct medical costs of COVID-19 treatments is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of older adults with COVID-19 and their costs for COVID-19-related medical care. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Medical claims for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. PATIENTS: Medicare FFS beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who had a COVID-19-related medical encounter during April through December 2020. MEASUREMENTS: Patient characteristics and direct medical costs of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Among 28.1 million Medicare FFS beneficiaries, 1 181 127 (4.2%) sought COVID-19-related medical care. Among these patients, 23.0% had an inpatient stay and 4.2% died during hospitalization. The majority of the patients were female (57.0%), non-Hispanic White (79.6%), and residents of an urban county (77.2%). Medicare FFS costs for COVID-19-related medical care were $6.3 billion; 92.6% of costs were for hospitalizations. The mean hospitalization cost was $21 752, and the mean length of stay was 9.2 days; hospitalization cost and length of stay were higher if the patient needed a ventilator ($49 441 and 17.1 days) or died ($32 015 and 11.3 days). The mean cost per outpatient visit was $164. Patients aged 75 years or older were more likely to be hospitalized, but their hospitalizations were associated with lower costs than for younger patients. Male sex and non-White race/ethnicity were associated with higher probability of being hospitalized and higher medical costs. LIMITATION: Results are based on Medicare FFS patients. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in substantial disease and economic burden among older Americans, particularly those of non-White race/ethnicity. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , COVID-19/economia , Custos Diretos de Serviços , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Medicare/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos Diretos de Serviços/tendências , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
6.
Surgery ; 170(3): 682-688, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33849734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Institutional experience has been associated with reduced mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting and valve operations. Using a contemporary, national cohort, we examined the impact of hospital volume on hospitalization costs and postdischarge resource utilization after these operations. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve operations were identified in the 2016 to 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Institutions were grouped into volume quartiles based on annual elective cardiac surgery caseload, and comparisons were made between the lowest and highest quartiles, using generalized linear models. RESULTS: Of an estimated 296,510 patients, 24.8% were treated at low-volume hospitals and 25.2% at high-volume hospitals. Compared with patients treated at low-volume hospitals, patients managed at high-volume hospitals were younger, had more comorbidities, and more frequently underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting valve (13.0% vs 12.3%, P < .001) and multivalve operations (6.2% vs 3.1%, P < .001). After adjustment, operations at high-volume hospitals were associated with a $7,600 reduction (95% confidence interval $4,700-$10,500) in costs. High-volume hospitals were also associated with reduced odds of mortality, non-home discharge, and 30-day non-elective readmission compared to low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSION: Despite increased complexity at high-volume centers, greater operative volume was independently associated with reduced hospitalization costs and mortality after elective cardiac operations. Reduction in non-home discharge and readmissions suggests this effect to extend beyond acute hospitalization, which may guide value-based care paradigms.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Gerenciamento de Dados/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Am J Cardiol ; 149: 95-102, 2021 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757784

RESUMO

There has been little exploration of acute myocarditis trends in children despite notable advancements in care over the past decade. We explored trends in pediatric hospitalizations for acute myocarditis from 2007 to 2016 in the United States (US). This was a retrospective, serial cross-sectional study of the National Inpatient Sample database from 2007 to 2016, identifying patients ≤18 years hospitalized with acute myocarditis. Patient demographics and incidence trends were examined. Other relevant clinical and resource utilization outcomes were also explored. Out of 60,390,000 weighted pediatric hospitalizations, 6371 were related to myocarditis. The incidence of myocarditis increased from 0.7 to 0.9 per 100,000 children (p <0.0001) over the study period. The mortality decreased from 7.5% to 6.1% (p = 0.02). A significant inflation-adjusted increase by $4,574 in the median hospitalization cost was noted (p = 0.02) while length of stay remained stable (median 6.1 days). Tachyarrhythmias were identified as the most common type of associated arrhythmia. The occurrence of congestive heart failure remained steady at 27%. In conclusion, in-hospital mortality associated with pediatric acute myocarditis has decreased in the United States over years 2007 to 2016 with a concurrent rise in incidence. Despite steady length of stay, hospitalization costs have increased. Future studies investigating long-term outcomes relating to acute myocarditis are warranted.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Miocardite/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Thorac Cancer ; 12(5): 567-579, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544445

RESUMO

Thoracoscopic lobectomy has become the preferred approach for surgical management of early stage lung cancer, but the potential higher operative costs limit its widespread use. Theoretically, higher direct costs may be significantly counterbalanced by lower indirect costs, resulting in lower overall costs for thoracoscopic than for open lobectomy. To support this hypothesis, we reviewed the literature until May 2020, analyzing all papers comparing the cost of thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy.A total of 20 studies provided the most applicable evidence to evaluate this issue. In all the studies apart from one, thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with higher operative costs due to the increased use of disposable instruments, and prolonged operative time. By contrast, in 17 studies the increased operative costs were significantly offset by indirect costs which were lower in thoracoscopic than in open lobectomy due to fewer postoperative complications, faster recovery, and lower readmission rates. It translated into lower overall costs for thoracoscopic than for open lobectomy in 10 studies, similar costs in seven, and higher in three, despite the lower hospitalization costs. The low bed fees and high prices of disposable instruments in these three studies may explain the discordance. The careful use of disposable instruments, and the minimizing hospitalization costs can reduce the total costs of thoracoscopic lobectomy to levels similar or to below those of open lobectomy. The worry that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy (VATSL) might be associated with an increased overal cost is thus not warranted, and should not be used as an excuse against the use of VATS in surgery for early stage lung cancers.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
9.
Chest ; 160(1): 165-174, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the frequency and cost of hospitalizations for acute respiratory failure (ARF), the literature regarding the impact of hospital safety net burden on outcomes of these hospitalizations is sparse. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does safety net burden impact outcomes of ARF hospitalizations such as mortality, tracheostomy, and resource use? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample 2007-2017. All patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ARF were tabulated using the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes, and safety net burden was calculated using previously published methodology. High- and low-burden hospitals were generated from proportions of Medicaid and uninsured patients. Trends were analyzed using a nonparametric rank-based test, whereas multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to establish associations of safety net burden with key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of an estimated 8,941,334 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of ARF, 33.9% were categorized as occurring at low-burden hospitals (LBHs) and 31.6% were categorized as occurring at high-burden hospitals (HBHs). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased at HBHs (22.8%-12.6%; nonparametric trend [nptrend] < .001) and LBHs (22.0%-10.9%; nptrend < .001) over the study period, as did tracheostomy placement (HBH, 5.6%-1.3%; LBH, 3.5%-0.8%; all nptrend <.001). After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, an HBH was associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.10-1.12) and tracheostomy use (AOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37), as well as greater hospitalization costs (ß coefficient, +$1,083; 95% CI, $882-$1,294) and longer lengths of stay (ß coefficient, +3.3 days; 95% CI, 3.2-3.3 days). INTERPRETATION: After accounting for differences between patient cohorts, high safety net burden was associated independently with inferior clinical outcomes and increased costs after ARF hospitalizations. These findings emphasize the need for health care reform to ameliorate disparities within these safety net centers, which treat our most vulnerable populations.


Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/economia , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Insuficiência Respiratória/economia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 112(1): 124-131, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068544

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the UK National Health Service, finite resources make the adoption of minimally invasive (MI) mitral valve surgery challenging unless greater operative costs (vs sternotomy [ST]) are balanced by postoperative savings. This study examined whether the cost analysis now became unfavorable. METHODS: All patients (n = 380) undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery with or without a maze procedure over a 3-year period by either MI or ST approaches were included. Propensity matching (2 cohorts, 1:1 matched;, n = 75 per group) and multivariable regression were used to assess for the effect on cost. Cost data were prospectively collected from Service Line Reporting and reported in Sterling (£) as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: Matched data revealed that total hospital costs were equivalent (MI vs ST, £16,672 [IQR, £15,044, £20,611] vs £15,875 [IQR, £12,281, £20,687]; P .33). Three of 15 costing pools were significantly different: operative costs were higher for the MI group (MI vs ST, £7458 [IQR, £6738, £8286] vs £5596 iIQR, £4204, £6992]; P < .001), whereas ward costs (boarding, nursing) (MI vs ST, £1464 [IQR, £1146, £1864] vs £1733 [IQR, £1403, £2445] P = .006) and pharmacy services (MI vs ST, £187 [IQR, £140, £239] vs £244 [IQR, £179, £375] P < .001) were lower for the MI group. Hospital stay was shorter in the MI group (MI vs ST, 6 days [IQR, 5, 8 days] vs 8 days [IQR, 6, 11 days]; P < .001). Multivariable regression produced similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in overall hospital cost between MI and ST mitral valve surgery: higher operative costs of MI surgery were offset by lower postoperative costs, with a 2-day shorter hospital stay.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reino Unido
11.
Am Surg ; 87(3): 364-369, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32988226

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The classic findings of acute appendicitis-right lower quadrant pain, anorexia, and leukocytosis-have been well known. However, emergency medicine and surgical providers continue to rely on imaging to confirm the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the increase in reliance on computed tomography (CT) scans for acute appendicitis diagnosis over time. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients ≥18 years presenting to UNC Hospitals with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who subsequently underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pathologic data were reviewed. We evaluated the incidence of CT scans stratified by year, age, and sex. RESULTS: Within our male population, 55.2% (278/504) had classic appendicitis symptoms. Of the 278 male patients with classic appendicitis symptoms, 248 underwent CT imaging. Male patients <45 years of age were more likely to present with classic appendicitis symptoms (216/357, 60.5%) compared with patients aged 46-65 (52/108, 48.1%) or >65 (10/39, 25.6%). Of the male patients <45 years with classic appendicitis symptoms, the incidence of CT scans increased over time (68.3% in 2011, 84.2% in 2012, 92.3% in 2013, 93.9% in 2014, 92.3% in 2015). When considering the 216 CT scans that could have been avoided in our population, we calculate an approximate savings of $173 998.80 over 5 years. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CT scans for acute appendicitis confirmation has increased over time even in men. CT scans for the diagnosis or confirmation of acute appendicitis should rarely be indicated in men aged <45 years with classic appendicitis symptoms.


Assuntos
Apendicite/diagnóstico por imagem , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/tendências , Procedimentos Desnecessários/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/economia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(1): 62-72.e1, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522616

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Outflow venous stenting as an adjunct to catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is performed to prevent recurrent thrombosis and to reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. Historical data show that stenting improves outcomes of surgical thrombectomy in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and recent observational data suggest that stenting improves long-term outcomes of CDT. However, the impact of stenting during CDT on acute safety outcomes is unknown. We sought to investigate the contemporary trends, safety outcomes, and resource utilization of adjunctive stent placement in patients undergoing CDT. METHODS: Patients with proximal lower extremity and caval DVT were identified within the National Inpatient Sample from January 2005 to December 2013. From this data set, we stratified our patients into three groups: patients who received CDT alone, patients who received CDT plus angioplasty, and patients who received CDT plus angioplasty with stenting. We used an inverse probability treatment weighting algorithm to create three weighted cohorts. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate the trends of stent placement among patients treated with CDT. The primary outcome was a composite end point of all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleed, or intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 138,049 patients were discharged with a principal diagnosis of proximal and caval DVT; 7097 of these patients received CDT (5.1%). From this group, 2854 (40.2%) were treated with CDT alone, 2311 (32.6%) received adjunctive angioplasty alone, and 1932 (27.2%) received adjunctive angioplasty and stent. Adjunctive stenting had a significantly lower rate of primary composite outcome compared with CDT alone (2.7% vs 3.8%; P = .04). Stent placement was associated with a similar length of stay compared with angioplasty and CDT alone groups (6.8 vs 6.9 vs 7.1 days, respectively; P = .94) and higher in-hospital charges ($115,164.01 ± $76,985.31 vs $98,089.82 ± $72,921.94 vs $80,441.63 ± $74,024.98; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study suggests that one in four patients undergoing CDT is treated with adjunctive stent placement in the United States. This observational study showed that adjunctive stenting does not adversely affect the acute safety outcomes of CDT; however, it was associated with increased hospital charges.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Terapia Trombolítica/tendências , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Stents/tendências , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/mortalidade
13.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 72: 147-158, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33340669

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) surgery is relatively rare and controversial, given the challenges in diagnosis as well as wide variation in symptomatic and functional recovery. Our aims were to measure trends in utilization of TOS surgery, complications, and mortality rates in a nationally representative cohort and compare higher versus lower volume centers. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes for rib resection and scalenectomy paired with axillo-subclavian aneurysm (arterial [aTOS]), subclavian deep vein thrombosis (venous [vTOS]), or brachial plexus lesions (neurogenic [nTOS]). Basic descriptive statistics, nonparametric tests for trend, and multivariable hierarchical regression models with random intercept for center were used to compare outcomes for TOS types, trends over time, and higher and lower volume hospitals, respectively. RESULTS: There were 3,547 TOS operations (for an estimated 18,210 TOS operations nationally) performed between 2010 and 2015 (89.2% nTOS, 9.9% vTOS, and 0.9% aTOS) with annual case volume increasing significantly over time (P = 0.03). Higher volume centers (≥10 cases per year) represented 5.2% of hospitals and 37.0% of cases, and these centers achieved significantly lower overall major complication (defined as neurologic injury, arterial or venous injury, vascular graft complication, pneumothorax, hemorrhage/hematoma, or lymphatic leak) rates (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.71 [95% confidence interval 0.52-0.98]; P = 0.04], but no difference in neurologic complications such as brachial plexus injury (aOR 0.69 [0.20-2.43]; P = 0.56) or vascular injuries/graft complications (aOR 0.71 [0.0.33-1.54]; P = 0.39). Overall mortality was 0.6%, neurologic injury was rare (0.3%), and the proportion of patients experiencing complications decreased over time (P = 0.03). However, vTOS and aTOS had >2.5 times the odds of major complication compared with nTOS (OR 2.68 [1.88-3.82] and aOR 4.26 [1.78-10.17]; P < 0.001), and ∼10 times the odds of a vascular complication (aOR 10.37 [5.33-20.19] and aOR 12.93 [3.54-47.37]; P < 0.001], respectively. As the number of complications decreased, average hospital charges also significantly decreased over time (P < 0.001). Total hospital charges were on average higher when surgery was performed in lower volume centers (<10 cases per year) compared with higher volume centers (mean $65,634 [standard deviation 98,796] vs. $45,850 [59,285]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of TOS operations has increased in the United States from 2010 to 2015, whereas complications and average hospital charges have decreased. Mortality and neurologic injury remain rare. Higher volume centers delivered higher value care: less or similar operative morbidity with lower total hospital charges.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/tendências , Osteotomia/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteotomia/efeitos adversos , Osteotomia/economia , Osteotomia/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Costelas/cirurgia , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/economia , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
14.
Am J Cardiol ; 141: 79-85, 2021 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275895

RESUMO

As the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) expands to varying patient populations, impacting the landscape of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), this study sought to assess volume and performance trends of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United States during 2012-2017. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent endovascular/transapical TAVI, isolated SAVR, or complex aortic valve surgery between 2012 and 2017. Temporal trends in annual case volume, admission costs, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day readmission were evaluated. Of 624,303 patients (median age 72 years) who received AVR, 387,011 (62%) were men. Among these patients, 170,521 (27%) underwent TAVI and 453,782 (73%) underwent SAVR with 299,398 isolated and 154,384 complex aortic valve surgery. TAVI patients were significantly older and higher risk compared with SAVR patients. From 2012 to 2017, the annual number of TAVI increased from 8,295 to 55,168 whereas SAVR volume remained remarkably stable. Patients who underwent AVR demonstrated significant improvements in mortality, stroke, duration of hospitalization, and 30-day readmission. In conclusion, this large contemporary analysis reports the considerable growth of AVR in the United States. It remains unequivocal that the treatment of aortic stenosis is improving overall with reduced mortality following AVR, highlighting the effectiveness of various process improvements such as newer valves, enhanced patient selection, and the interdisciplinary Heart Team approach.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/tendências , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/epidemiologia , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/terapia , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2028470, 2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284340

RESUMO

Importance: Hospitals are reimbursed based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), which are defined, in part, by patients having 1 or more complications or comorbidities within a given DRG family. Hospitals have made substantial investment in efforts to document these complications and comorbidities. Objective: To examine temporal trends in DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity, compare these findings with 2 alternative measures of disease severity, and estimate associated changes in payment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the all-payer National Inpatient Sample for admissions assigned to 1 of the top 20 reimbursed DRG families at US acute care hospitals from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from July 10, 2018, to May 29, 2019. Exposures: Quarter year of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity. Secondary outcomes were comorbidity scores, risk-adjusted mortality rates, and estimated payment. Changes in assigned DRGs, comorbidity scores, and risk-adjusted mortality rates were analyzed by linear regression. Payment changes were estimated for each DRG by calculating the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services weighted payment using 2012 and 2016 case mix and hospitalization counts. Results: Between 2012 and 2016, there were 62 167 976 hospitalizations for the 20 highest-reimbursed DRG families; the sample was 32.9% male and 66.8% White, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range, 31-73 years). Within 15 of these DRG families (75%), the proportion of DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity increased significantly over time. Over the same period, comorbidity scores were largely stable, with a decrease in 6 DRG families (30%), no change in 10 (50%), and an increase in 4 (20%). Among 19 DRG families with a calculable mortality rate, the risk-adjusted mortality rate significantly decreased in 8 (42%), did not change in 9 (47%), and increased in 2 (11%). The observed DRG shifts were associated with at least $1.2 billion in increased payment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, between 2012 and 2016, the proportion of admissions assigned to a DRG with major complication or comorbidity increased for 15 of the top 20 reimbursed DRG families. This change was not accompanied by commensurate increases in disease severity but was associated with increased payment.


Assuntos
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Hospitalização , Comorbidade , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/tendências , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 95(12): 2665-2673, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168160

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contemporary trends in outcomes and resource use associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent TAVR between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, in the National Readmission Database. We assessed temporal trends in clinical outcomes, length-of-stay, non-home discharges, and cost of the index TAVR hospitalization. We also evaluated the changes in the burden of hospitalizations before and after TAVR. RESULTS: A total of 89,202 patients were included. In-hospital mortality decreased from 5.3% (188) in 2012 to 1.6% (484) in 2017 (adjusted odds ratio: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.46). Risk-adjusted incidences of new dialysis, vascular complications, blood transfusion, and mechanical ventilation decreased, but strokes and pacemaker implantations remained unchanged. Length of stay decreased from median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4 to 11) to 2 (IQR: 2 to 5) days (P<.001). Risk-adjusted non-home discharges decreased from 32.2% (1134) to 15.5% (386) (P<.001). Median cost of the TAVR hospitalization decreased from $56,022 (IQR: $43,690 to $75,174) to $46,101 (IQR: $36,083 to $59,752) (P<.001). Pre-TAVR admissions at 30, 90, and 180 days decreased from 21.6% (713), 39.5% (1160), and 50.5% (1009) in 2012 to 15.5% (4451), 30.2% (7186), and 36.8% (5928) in 2017, respectively (P<.001). Similarly, re-hospitalizations at 30, 90, and 180 days post-TAVR decreased from 17.5% (531), 27.9% (657), and 34.2% (521) to 12.4% (3486), 21.1% (4783), and 29.1% (4306), respectively (P<.001). The expenditure on index, pre-, and post-TAVR hospitalizations increased from $0.53 to $2.8 billion between 2012 and 2017. CONCLUSION: This study reflects the changes in the characteristics and outcomes of TAVR in the United States between 2012 and 2017. It also shows the temporal decrease in resource use, cost, and burden of hospitalizations among patients undergoing TAVR in the United States, but an increase in the overall expenditure on TAVR-related hospitalizations.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Idoso , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/economia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 13(11): e006449, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176467

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postacute care is a major driver of cardiac surgical episode spending, but the sources of variation in spending have not been explored. The objective of this study was to identify sources of variation in postacute care spending within 90-days of discharge following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) and the relationship between postacute care spending and other postdischarge utilization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of public and private administrative claims for Michigan residents insured by Medicare fee-for-service and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network commercial and Medicare Advantage plans undergoing CABG (n=11 208) or AVR (n=6122) in 33 nonfederal acute care Michigan hospitals between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. Postacute care use was present in 9662 (86.2%) CABG episodes and 4242 (69.3%) AVR episodes, with respective mean (SD) 90-day spending of $4398±$6124 and $3465±$5759. Across hospitals, mean postacute care spending ranged from $3280 to $8186 for CABG and $2246 to $7710 for AVR. Inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facility care accounted for over 80% of the variation spending between low and high postacute care spending hospitals. At the hospital-level, postacute care spending was modestly correlated across procedures and payers. Spending associated with readmissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient facility care was significantly different between low and high postacute care spending hospitals in CABG and AVR episodes. CONCLUSIONS: There was wide hospital variation in postacute care spending after cardiac surgery, which was primarily driven by differential use and intensity in facility-based postacute care. Optimizing facility-based postacute care after cardiac surgery offers unique opportunities to reduce potentially unwarranted care variation.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Planos de Seguro Blue Cross Blue Shield/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/tendências , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Hospitais/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part C/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
18.
Vasc Med ; 25(6): 527-533, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33019909

RESUMO

The development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly improved the life expectancy of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but has led to the rise of chronic conditions including peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, trends and outcomes among patients with HIV undergoing lower extremity revascularization are poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the trends and perioperative outcomes of lower extremity revascularization among patients with HIV and PAD in a national database. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was reviewed between 2003 and 2014. All hospital admissions with a diagnosis of PAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization were stratified based on HIV status. Outcomes were assessed using propensity score matching and multivariable regression. Among all patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization for PAD, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients with HIV from 0.21% in 2003 to 0.52% in 2014 (p < 0.01). Patients with HIV were more likely to be younger, male, and have fewer comorbidities, including coronary artery disease and diabetes, at the time of intervention compared to patients without HIV. With propensity score matching and multivariable regression, HIV status was associated with increased total hospital costs, but not length of stay, major amputation, or mortality. Patients with HIV with PAD who undergo revascularization are younger with fewer comorbidities, but have increased hospital costs compared to those without HIV. Lower extremity revascularization for PAD is safe for patients with HIV without increased risk of in-hospital major amputation or mortality, and continues to increase each year.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Claudicação Intermitente/cirurgia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/economia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/economia , Claudicação Intermitente/epidemiologia , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/economia , Isquemia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia
19.
Am J Cardiol ; 137: 89-96, 2020 12 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991853

RESUMO

As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continues its rapid growth as a treatment approach for aortic stenosis, costs associated with TAVI, and its burden to healthcare systems will assume greater importance. Patients undergoing TAVI between January 2012 and November 2017 in the Nationwide Readmission Database were identified. Trends in cause-specific readmissions were assessed using Poisson regression. Thirty-day TAVI cost burden (cost of index TAVI hospitalization plus total 30-day readmissions cost) was adjusted to 2017 U.S. dollars and trended over year from 2012 to 2017. Overall, 47,255 TAVI were included and 30-day readmissions declined from 20% to 12% (p <0.0001). Most common causes of readmission (heart failure, infection/sepsis, gastrointestinal causes, and respiratory) declined as well, except arrhythmia/heart block which increased (1.0% to 1.4%, p <0.0001). Cost of TAVI hospitalization ($52,024 to $44,110, p <0.0001) and 30-day cost burden ($54,122 to $45,252, p <0.0001) declined. Whereas costs of an average readmission did not change ($9,734 to $10,068, p = 0.06), cost burden of readmissions (per every TAVI performed) declined ($4,061 to $1,883, p <0.0001), including reductions in each of the top 5 causes except arrhythmia/heart block ($171 to $263, p = 0.04). Index TAVI hospitalizations complicated by acute kidney injury, length of stay ≥5 days, low hospital procedural volume, and skilled nursing facility discharge were associated with increased odds of 30-day readmissions. In conclusion, the costs of index hospitalizations and 30-day cost burden for TAVI in the U.S. significantly declined from 2012 to 2017. However, readmissions due to arrhythmia/heart block and their associated costs increased. Continued strategies to prevent readmissions, especially those for conduction disturbances, are crucial in the efforts to optimize outcomes and costs with the ongoing expansion of TAVI.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/economia , Feminino , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(3): 767-772, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32980126

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors associated with high-cost inpatient admissions for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Operative hospitalizations for ovarian cancer patients ≥65 years of age were identified using the 2010-2017 National Inpatient Sample. Admissions with high-cost were defined as those incurring ≥90th percentile of hospitalization costs each year, while the remainder were considered low-cost. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to assess independent predictors of being in the high-cost cohort. RESULTS: During the study period, an estimated 58,454 patients met inclusion criteria. 5827 patient admissions (9.98%) were classified as high-cost. Median hospitalization cost for this high-cost group was $55,447 (interquartile range (IQR) $46,744-$74,015) compared to $16,464 (IQR $11,845-$23,286, p < 0.001) for the low-cost group. Patients with high-cost admissions were more likely to have received open (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.23, 1.31-3.79) or extended (AOR 5.64, 4.79-6.66) procedures and be admitted non-electively (AOR 3.32, 2.74-4.02). Being in the top income quartile (AOR 1.77, 1.39-2.27) was also associated with high-cost. Age and hospital factors, including bed size and volume of gynecologic oncology surgery, did not affect cost group. CONCLUSION: High-cost ovarian cancer admissions were three times more expensive than low-cost admissions. Fewer open and extended procedures with subsequently shorter lengths of stay may have contributed to decreasing inpatient costs over the study period. In this cohort of patients largely covered by Medicare, clinical factors outweigh socioeconomic factors as cost drivers. Understanding the relationship of disease-specific and social factors to cost will be important in informing future value-based quality improvement efforts in gynecologic cancer care.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Geografia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA