90Y-Daclizumab (Anti-CD25), High-Dose Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Yielded Sustained Complete Remissions in 4 Patients with Recurrent Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Background: Despite advances in therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), a proportion of patients will not respond or relapse. The authors had previously identified CD25, IL-2Rα, as a target for systemic radioimmunotherapy of HL since most normal cells do not express CD25, but it is expressed by a minority of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells and most Tregs rosetting around HRS cells. Study Design and Treatment: This was a single institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase I/II trial of radiolabeled 90Y-daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning treatment followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Four patients with refractory and relapsed HL were treated in this trial with 3 patients receiving a single dose of 564.6-574.6 MBq 90Y-daclizumab and the fourth patient receiving two doses of 580.9-566.1 MBq 90Y-daclizumab followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results: All 4 evaluable patients treated with 90Y-daclizumab obtained complete responses (CRs) that are ongoing 4.5-7 years following their stem cell transplant. The spectrum and severity of adverse events were mild and more importantly none of the patients, including several with multiple therapies before this treatment, developed the myelodysplastic syndrome. Discussion: Targeting by daclizumab was not directed primarily at tumor cells, but rather the nonmalignant CD25-expressing T cells adjacent to the HRS cells and 90Y-daclizumab provided strong enough ß emissions to kill CD25-negative tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong ß irradiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: 90Y-daclizumab (anti-CD25), high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT was well tolerated and yielded sustained complete remissions in all 4 patients with recurrent HL patients who completed their treatment. Significance: Despite advances, a proportion of patients with HL will not have a CR to their initial treatment, and some with CRs will relapse. They demonstrated that the addition of 90Y-daclizumab into the preconditioning regimen for refractory and relapsed HL patients with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT provided sustained CRs in the 4 patients studied. Two of these patients were highly refractory to multiple prior treatments with bulky disease at entry into this study, including 1 patient who never entered a remission and had failed 6 different therapeutic regimens. Despite the small number of patients treated in this study, the sustained clinical benefit in these patients indicates a highly effective treatment. The daclizumab was directed primarily not at HRS cells themselves but toward nonmalignant T cells rosetting around malignant cells. 90Y provided strong ß emissions that killed antigen nonexpressing tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong ß radiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment that nurtured the malignant cells in the lymphomatous mass. The present study supports expanded analysis of 90Y-daclizumab as part of the regimen of ASCT in patients with refractory and relapsed HL.

Steroid-Free Immune Suppression Impairs Glycemic Control in a Healthy Cynomolgus Monkey.

The need for chronic immune suppression (IS) is one of the hurdles precluding widespread use of islet cell transplantation to restore glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. We report the case of a healthy nonhuman primate (NHP) treated on and off for over 2.5 years with steroid-free IS, consisting of daclizumab induction and maintenance therapy with rapamycin and low dose tacrolimus. Treatment for 1 year resulted in a striking destabilization of glycemic control, with concomitant decreases in fasting c-peptide and insulin levels. Although these changes gradually reversed during a wash out period of 7 months, retreatment with the same therapy led to accelerated deterioration in glycemic control. Intravenous glucose tolerance and percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin testing further supported a dramatic effect on metabolic control. IS also led to decreases in weight during treatment. Histological evaluation of the pancreas revealed islet hyperplasia, with varying sizes and endocrine cell ratios that differed from normal islet composition, and parenchymal infiltration with adipose tissue. These deleterious effects of IS on glucose control and endocrine components in the native pancreas of a healthy NHP suggest that IS agents commonly utilized for islet transplantation may contribute to failure in islet allograft function in long-term transplant patients.

Daclizumab in multiple sclerosis. / Daclizumab en la esclerosis multiple.

INTRODUCTION: Daclizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD25 subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor, investigated as a disease-modifying therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The present review addresses how the drug was developed, the known mechanism of action of the drug and the up-to-date data of efficacy and safety. DEVELOPMENT: Daclizumab has shown superiority in prevention of relapses against placebo and low-dose interferon beta-1a at a level that puts it on par with the rest of current first-line drugs. The effect on the progression of the disease and on neurodegeneration parameters, however, is not clear. On the other hand, it presents safety problems (mainly risk of autoimmunity phenomena including fulminant hepatopathy and encephalitis) that have supposed eventually its withdrawn from marketing. Daclizumab introduces a new mechanism of action through the blocking of a key interleukin in immune regulation and its effect on a population of cells with regulatory ability, such as the NK CD56(bright) cells. CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab has shown efficacy in slowing the inflammatory process of multiple sclerosis, although the appearance of potentially serious side effects has not allowed its use to significantly impact current clinical practice. The development of new drugs in multiple sclerosis must be contingent on maintaining or improving the risk-benefit profile with respect to those already in use.

TITLE: Daclizumab en la esclerosis multiple.Introduccion. El daclizumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal dirigido contra la subunidad CD25 del receptor de la interleucina-2, investigado como terapia modificadora de la evolucion de la enfermedad en la esclerosis multiple. La presente revision aborda como se desarrollo el farmaco, cual es su mecanismo de accion conocido y los datos que se han obtenido hasta la fecha acerca de su eficacia y seguridad. Desarrollo. El daclizumab ha mostrado superioridad en prevencion de brotes frente a placebo e interferon beta-1a de baja dosis en un nivel que lo situa a la par del resto de farmacos de primera linea actuales. El efecto sobre la progresion de la enfermedad y sobre parametros de neurodegeneracion, no obstante, no esta aclarado. Por otro lado, presenta problemas de seguridad (riesgo de reacciones autoinmunes que incluyen hepatopatia fulminante y encefalitis) que han supuesto finalmente su retirada del mercado. El daclizumab introduce un nuevo mecanismo de accion a traves del bloqueo de una interleucina clave en la regulacion inmune y por su efecto sobre una poblacion de celulas con capacidad reguladora, como son las celulas NK CD56(bright). Conclusiones. El daclizumab ha demostrado eficacia para frenar el proceso inflamatorio de la esclerosis multiple, aunque la aparicion de efectos secundarios potencialmente graves no ha permitido que su uso impacte de manera significativa en la practica clinica actual. El desarrollo de nuevos farmacos en la esclerosis multiple debe estar supeditado a mantener o mejorar el perfil riesgo-beneficio respecto a los ya en uso.

Efficacy of daclizumab beta versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a on disability progression across patient demographic and disease activity subgroups in DECIDE.

BACKGROUND: Demonstration of clinical benefits on disability progression measures is an important attribute of effective multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments. OBJECTIVE: Examine efficacy of daclizumab beta versus intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a on measures of disability progression in patient subgroups from DECIDE. METHODS: Twenty-four-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), 24-week sustained worsening on a modified Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFCS) where 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test was replaced by Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and proportion of patients with clinically meaningful worsening in 29-Item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale (MSIS-29 PHYS) score from baseline to week 96 were examined in the overall population and subgroups defined by baseline demographic/disease characteristics. RESULTS: Daclizumab beta significantly reduced risk of 24-week CDP (hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.55-0.98), risk of 24-week sustained MSFCS progression (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.95), and odds of clinically meaningful worsening in MSIS-29 PHYS (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) versus IM interferon beta-1a. Point estimates showed trends favoring daclizumab beta over IM interferon beta-1a across several patient subgroups for all three outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Daclizumab beta showed consistent benefit versus IM interferon beta-1a across measures assessing patient disability/function and across a range of clinical baseline characteristics in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.