Improving the efficiency of ion mobility spectrometry analyses by using multivariate calibration.

The simplicity, sensitivity and expeditiousness of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) make it especially useful for the determination of active principal ingredients (APIs) present at low concentrations in pharmaceuticals. However, the poor resolution of this technique precludes the identification and/or determination of substances with similar molecular weights, which exhibit also similar drift times and give overlapped peaks as a result. Oral contraceptives are pharmaceutical formulations containing two APIs of similar molecular weights at very low concentrations which therefore give strongly overlapped peaks hindering their determination by IMS. In this work, we assessed the potential of IMS for detecting and quantifying the contraceptives ethinylestradiol (ETE) and desogestrel (DES) in commercial tablets. To this end, we used various chemometric techniques including a second-derivative (TN2D) algorithm and the more powerful choice Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) to improve the resolution of IMS and enable the determination of both APIs. Quantitation was based on PLS1 models for each API. The models constructed involve a single PLS factor with a Y-explained variance above 98.4%, obtaining a RMSEP of 0.34 and 0.63 for ETE and DES, respectively. The ensuing method, which was validated for use in routine analyses, is quite expeditious (analyses take less than 1 min) and uses very small amounts of sample (a few microliters). Based on the results, IMS has a great potential for the qualitative and quantitative determination of APIs in low doses.

[The statement of Polish Gynecological Society experts on oral use of contraceptive 75 microg desogestrel minipill in different clinical cases--state of art in 2008]. / Stanowisko Zespolu Ekspertów Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczace zastosowania antykoncepcyjnej minitabletki gestagennej zawierajacej 75 microg dezogestrelu w wybranych sytuacjach klinicznych--stan wiedzy na 2008 rok.

Recent epidemiologic studies indicate that use of combined oral contraception is associated with a increase in the incidence of cardiovascular disease (venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and stroke). The risk of cardiovascular disease is strongly related to estrogen dose, progestogen type and other factors for example thrombogenic mutations and cigarette smoking among female over age 35. The progestogen only contraception is safe alternative to combined hormonal contraception. Progestogen only pill (POP) has different levels of action (local and/or central) which may vary from one drug to another. As for the cardiovascular disease risk, progestogens are not considered to be risk factors. Desogestrel containing POP is advised in the following cases: bad tolerance of exogenous oestrogens; in order to counteract an endogenous hyperoestrogenosis; medical, metabolic or cardiovascular contraindications to estroprogestogen contraception. Lastly, POP should be used as a prime contraception in some particular situations (breast feeding, endometriosis, adenomyosis, cigarette smoking, contraception for older women). These recommendations present the actual system of care in that population of women in Poland.

Contraceptive efficacy and side effects of Implanon.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and side effects of Implanon used for long-term contraception. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective study of 80 patients who used Implanon for long-term contraception between January 2004 and January 2006. Side effects, efficacy and removals were recorded. RESULTS: Amenorrhoea, infrequent bleeding and frequent bleeding were reported by 33 (41.25%), 19 (23.75%) and 14 patients (17.5%), respectively. Non-menstrual side effects comprised breast tenderness in 15 patients (18.75%), acne in eight (10%), headache and dizziness in three (3.75%); depressive mood disorders, pelvic pain and loss of libido were mentioned each by two of the women (2.5%). During the study period, Implanon was removed from 20 participants. No problem was encountered during its placement or removal. CONCLUSION: Patients considering use of Implanon must be carefully selected and informed about its expected side effects before placement.

Combined administration of low-dose gossypol acetic acid with desogestrel/mini-dose ethinylestradiol/testosterone undecanoate as an oral contraceptive for men.

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a new regimen of low-dose gossypol acetic acid (GA) combined with desogestrel/ethinylestradiol and testosterone undecanoate (DSG/E/TU) as a male contraceptive, adult male rats were fed orally with GA (12.5 mg/kg/day) and DSG (0.125 mg/kg)/E (0.025 mg/kg)/TU (100 mg/kg) daily for 8 weeks as loading dose until infertility, and a similar low dose of GA alone for infertility maintenance. Control animals were administered a single low dose of GA (12.5 mg/kg/day) or DSG (0.125 mg/kg)/E (0.025 mg/kg)/TU (100 mg/kg), and vehicle, respectively. Results demonstrated that the combined dosage regimen could damage epididymal sperm motility and density, and induce infertility within 8 weeks in rats; the infertility could be consistently sustained by giving single GA (12.5 mg/kg/day), and was reversible in about 8 weeks following withdrawal of gossypol. The regimen rendered treated male rats with spermiation failure within a period of 6-20 weeks of treatment. Also, the serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testicular interstitial fluid testosterone levels showed a transient decrease at the end of 6 or 8 weeks, which returned to control levels after 8 weeks of recovery phase. No hypokalemia or other adverse effects in viscera were observed. These results provide a promising approach to using the new regimen for the development of an effective and reversible oral male contraceptive.

Spontaneous snapping of an Implanon in two halves in situ.

A 30-year-old woman presented at our family planning clinic for Implanon removal and reinsertion. At the time of presentation the patient's weight was 148 kg. The Implanon was fitted in July 2000 (i.e. 35 months previously) when her weight was 138.5 kg. The patient was very happy with the contraceptive method. She was aware that her Implanon had snapped in half about 2 months ago. There was no aggravating factor such as weightlifting associated with this incidence.

Efficacy, cycle control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations.

Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 micrograms preparations are available. To address this issue, we conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing Alesse (20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 micrograms EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 micrograms EE) among 463 OC starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and nausea were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 micrograms EE as compared to 20 micrograms EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters; users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than Alesse users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 micrograms EE users.

PIP: Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 mcg preparations are available. To address this issue, researchers conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing Alesse (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 mcg EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 mcg EE) among 463 oral contraceptive starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and nausea were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 mcg EE as in those using 20 mcg EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters, users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than Alesse users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 mcg EE users.

A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/150 micrograms desogestrel, with respect to efficacy, cycle control and tolerance.

The aim of this study was to compare contraceptive reliability, cycle control and tolerance of an oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene, with a reference preparation containing the same dose of estrogen combined with 150 micrograms desogestrel. This article presents interim data from centers in France and Austria, involving a total of 479 women and 4,991 cycles. Contraceptive reliability was good with both preparations. Two pregnancies occurred in the gestodene group, but neither were due to method failure. In the desogestrel group there were also two pregnancies, of which one was due to method failure. With respect to cycle control, there is a trend towards a lower incidence of intermenstrual bleeding in the gestodene group. The incidence of spotting (scanty bleeding) during the important first three cycles was 3.5% lower in the gestodene group, and over the first six cycles, it was 7.6% lower. Amenorrhea was similar in both groups, but the incidence of dysmenorrhea was significantly lower in the gestodene group (p=0.001). Adverse events were similar in both groups, with headache, breast tension and nausea the most frequently reported symptoms. Body weight remained relatively constant during treatment in both groups, and no hypertension was reported for any woman during the course of the study. In each treatment group, 19 women discontinued because of adverse events. It is concluded that both preparation are reliable and well tolerated oral contraceptives are reliable and well tolerated oral contraceptives; however, there is a more favourable effect on dysmenorrhea by the gestodene formulation.

Climacteric symptoms and control of the cycle in women aged 35 years or older taking an oral contraceptive with 0.150 mg desogestrel and 0.020 mg ethinylestradiol.

In a multicenter prospective trial, 58 healthy women aged between 35 and 49 years were studied for one year (639 cycles) while taking an oral contraceptive (OC) containing desogestrel 0.150 mg and ethinylestradiol (EE) 0.020 mg. Efficacy, control of the cycle, side effects, complaints, and climacteric symptoms were monitored after 3, 6, 9 and 12 cycles. No pregnancies occurred during the study period. Spotting gradually decreased from 29.3% in cycle 1 to 4.2% in cycle 12, while breakthrough bleeding (BTB) disappeared after cycle 7. One case of superficial thrombophlebitis and 3 cases of minor side effects were registered. With regard to the complaints, breast tenderness, headache, and depression gradually decreased during the study (basal vs. 12-month data: 50.9% vs. 31.2%, 48.3% vs. 18.7%, 39.6% vs. 20.8%, respectively), while nausea disappeared after three months. A significant treatment-dependent reduction of climacteric symptoms was obtained after cycle 3 and this tendency was maintained up to cycle 12. No changes were registered in body mass index (BMI) or blood pressure.

Twelve years of clinical experience with an oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel.

The clinical experience with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol is reviewed. Fourteen clinical trials have been reported involving over 44,000 women for more than 190,000 cycles. None of the 17 pregnancies which occurred (overall Pearl Index 0.12) were due to method failure. The incidences of breakthrough bleeding and spotting after 6 treatment cycles varied from 0.1-6.0% and 2.8-11% of subjects, respectively, and at this time they were not significantly different from pretreatment in most trials. About 90% of subjects maintained regular cycles. The incidence of subjective side effects (approximately 5% for headache, 4% for breast tenderness, 2% for nausea) was low. No significant changes occurred in body weight or blood pressure. In all trials, the COC was well accepted and the rates of discontinuation were similar to those in other COC trials. Pharmacodynamic effects have been widely investigated. There were no significant changes in glucose metabolism or in haematological factors except for possibly minor increases in factors VII and X, fibrinogen and plasminogen. Over thirty studies of the effect of the COC on lipid metabolism have been published; significant increases occur in serum triglycerides, HDL-C and apoprotein A1. SHBG concentrations increase 2-3 fold with a consequent decrease in the levels of free testosterone. This effect can be particularly important therapeutically in women with hyperandrogenic skin disorders and 14 trials in women with these disorders have demonstrated significant clinical improvement with the COC. The findings from the various trials show the COC to be effective and acceptable with no adverse metabolic effects.

Comparative evaluation of the androgenicity of four low-dose, fixed-combination oral contraceptives.

Changes in endogenous androgen metabolism were compared in healthy women taking one of four low-dose modern oral contraceptives (OCs). One hundred women were randomized to (1) 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) + 250 micrograms norgestimate (Cilest); (2) 20 micrograms EE + 150 micrograms desogestrel (Mercilon); (3) 30 micrograms EE + 150 micrograms desogestrel (Marvelon); or (4) 30 micrograms EE + 75 micrograms gestodene (Femodene). During the luteal phase of the pretreatment cycle, body weight and blood pressure were recorded, and plasma levels of the following variables were recorded: sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), cortisol-binding globulin (CBG), testosterone, free testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and hydroxyprogesterone. The free androgen index was also calculated. These variables were remeasured during the third week of OC intake and during the fourth and sixth cycles. There were no statistically significant differences in androgenic variables among the four OCs. The DHEAS concentration decreased less with the 20 micrograms EE + desogestrel formulation compared with either 30 micrograms EE + desogesterel or norgestimate-containing formulations (20% vs. 45%). Concentrations of SHBG and CBG increased significantly in all four groups (average 263 +/- 119% and 94 +/- 26%, respectively); CBG increased less in women taking 20 micrograms EE + desogestrel (about 75%) than in the other formulations (about 100%). The four modern, low-dose OCs tested had similar impacts on endogenous androgen metabolism, yielding significant decreases in testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, and DHEAS. All of these formulations may be beneficial in women with androgen-related syndromes such as acne and hirsutism. Large studies are under way to establish which of the third-generation OCs is the least androgenic. In vitro studies suggest that norgestimate has the least androgenic profile.

Multicenter study in Hungary with a 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol- and 150 micrograms desogestrel-containing monophasic oral contraceptive.

Among the countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Hungary has a high oral contraceptive prevalence rate. Until recently, however, Hungarian women have not had access to combined oral contraceptives with new, third-generation progestogens. Marvelon (30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel) was first introduced in 1981 in Western Europe and has, in a number of different studies, proven an effective and well-tolerated oral contraceptive with no effect on blood pressure and a favorable lipid profile. Marvelon was introduced in Hungary in October 1991. Prior to its introduction, a multicenter study was undertaken in Hungary with Marvelon to confirm the clinical results of studies from other countries. The present study confirmed Marvelon to be an effective, well-tolerated combined oral contraceptive with no relevant effect on blood pressure. Remarkable improvements were noted, especially with regard to side-effects, in switchers from other oral contraceptives. It is concluded that Marvelon is a valuable extension of the range of contraceptive methods available in Hungary.

A multicenter clinical trial in Nigeria with a low-dose oral contraceptive, Marvelon.

The monophasic combination preparation, Marvelon, is a modern, technically improved oral contraceptive. It was tested for contraceptive reliability, cycle control and acceptability in 4 clinical centers in Nigeria for a period of one year. A total of 408 women was included in these studies, and 3102 cycles were monitored. The results showed a high contraceptive reliability and an excellent cycle-control. It was well tolerated. There were very few side-effects and the symptoms during medication were minor and hardly needed any treatment. At 12 months, 43.1% of the acceptors were still in the trial. Seventy-nine women (19.4%) discontinued before the end of the study for any reason. Drop-out reasons of these women were mainly non-medical. For the remainder of drop-outs no reason was given. This study suggests that this new oral contraceptive adequately satisfies the contraceptive needs of modern women.