Evaluating the reliability of hair analysis in monitoring the compliance of ADHD patients under treatment with Lisdexamphetamine.

Considering the high clinical and forensic relevance of pharmaco-adherence during lisdexamphetamine (LDX) treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the aim here was to evaluate hair analysis as a tool for monitoring compliance in patients currently undergoing long term treatment with LDX, by detecting possible interruptions of medication intake or changes in dosage. For this purpose, a total of 24 patients from an outpatient clinic for ADHD were recruited. Hair and urine samples were taken after three consecutive therapy sessions over a 7-month period and analyzed for amphetamine (AMP) enantiomers and other drugs, using chiral and achiral liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Participants also provided information on the condition of their hair, the consumption of illegal psychotropic substances and the regularity of taking LDX. Two participants withdrew from the study early. Urine analyses were positive for D-AMP in all urine samples and therapy sessions, except in two patients who did not take LDX on a daily basis. D-AMP was detected in all hair samples; however, no correlation was found between prescribed dose/day and D-AMP concentrations in proximal hair segments. Qualitative interpretation of hair analysis showed that 18 of the 22 study completers were compliant concerning the intake of LDX without additional consumption of illegal D,L-AMP. Analysis of urine taken during the therapy sessions showed no correlation between D-AMP concentrations and prescribed dosage, with or without normalization for creatinine. In conclusion, chiral LC-MS/MS hair analysis might represent a non-invasive way to confirm LDX use within the approximate period covered by the hair segment tested, but it does not allow for quantitative therapeutic drug monitoring because of interindividual variability of concentrations in hair. Drug concentrations in hair at different stages of long-term treatment should thus be interpreted with caution by clinicians and forensic experts alike when making assessments of treatment adherence.

Method validation and determination of lisdexamfetamine and amphetamine in oral fluid, plasma and urine by LC-MS/MS.

Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a long-acting prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and binge-eating disorder symptoms. In vivo hydrolysis of LDX amide bond releases the therapeutically active d-amphetamine (d-AMPH). Since toxicological tests in biological samples can detect AMPH from the use of some legal medications, efficient methods are needed in order to correctly interpret the results. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of LDX and its main biotransformation product AMPH in human oral fluid, plasma and urine. Calibration curve range for both analytes was 1-128 ng/mL in oral fluid and plasma and 4-256 ng/mL in urine, being the lowest concentration the limit of quantification. Accuracy of the determined values of the target analytes for the five control levels ranged from 94.8 to 111.7% for oral fluid, from 91.3 to 100.2% for plasma and from 94.8 to 109.8% for urine. Imprecision for the five control levels did not exceeded 12.8% for oral fluid, 16.2% for plasma and 17.1% for urine. The method developed for the three matrices was validated and was also successfully applied to assess real samples, showing for the first time the detection of LDX in oral fluid.

An Infant with a Prolonged Sympathomimetic Toxidrome after Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Ingestion.

INTRODUCTION: Stimulant medications are approved to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children over the age of 6 years. Fatal ingestion of stimulants by children has been reported, although most ingestions do not result in severe toxicity. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a once daily long-acting stimulant, is a prodrug requiring conversion to its active form, dextroamphetamine, in the bloodstream. Based on its unique pharmacokinetics, peak levels of d-amphetamine are delayed. We describe a case of accidental ingestion of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in an infant. CASE REPORT: A previously healthy 10-month-old infant was admitted to the hospital with a 5-h history of tachycardia, hypertension, dyskinesia, and altered mental status of unknown etiology. Confirmatory urine testing, from a specimen collected approximately 16 h after the onset of symptoms, revealed an urine amphetamine concentration of 22,312 ng/mL (positive cutoff 200 ng/mL). The serum amphetamine concentration, from a specimen collected approximately 37 h after the onset of symptoms, was 68 ng/mL (positive cutoff 20 ng/mL). Urine and serum were both negative for methamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy), and methylenedioxyethamphetamine (MDEA). During the hospitalization, it was discovered that the infant had access to lisdexamfetamine dimesylate prior to the onset of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Amphetamine ingestions in young children are uncommon but do occur. Clinicians should be aware of signs and symptoms of amphetamine toxicity and consider ingestion when a pediatric patient presents with symptoms of a sympathetic toxidrome even when ingestion is denied.