RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Available research suggests that menstrual inequity has an impact on (menstrual) health outcomes and emotional wellbeing. It is also a significant barrier to achieve social and gender equity and compromises human rights and social justice. The aim of this study was to describe menstrual inequities and their associations with sociodemographic factors, among women and people who menstruate (PWM) aged 18-55 in Spain. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted in Spain between March and July 2021. Descriptive statistical analyses and multivariate logistic regression models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 22,823 women and PWM were included in the analyses (Mean age = 33.2, SD = 8.7). Over half of the participants had accessed healthcare services for menstruation (61.9%). The odds for accessing menstrual-related services were significantly higher among participants with university education (aOR: 1.48, 95% CI, 1.13-1.95). Also, 57.8% reported having had partial or no menstrual education pre-menarche, with odds being higher among participants born in non-European or Latin American countries (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.93). Lifetime self-reported menstrual poverty was between 22.2-39.9%. Main risk factors for menstrual poverty were identifying as non-binary (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI, 1.32-2.11), being born in non-European or Latin American countries (aOR: 2.74, 95% CI, 1.77-4.24), and not having a permit to reside in Spain (aOR: 4.27, 95% CI, 1.94-9.38). Completed university education (aOR: 0.61, 95% CI, 0.44-0.84) and no financial hardship < 12 months (aOR: 0.06, 95% CI, 0.06-0.07) were protective factors for menstrual poverty. Besides, 75.2% reported having overused menstrual products due to lack of access to adequate menstrual management facilities. Menstrual-related discrimination was reported by 44.5% of the participants. Non-binary participants (aOR: 1.88, 95% CI, 1.52-2.33) and those who did not have a permit to reside in Spain (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI, 1.10-4.03) had higher odds of reporting menstrual-related discrimination. Work and education absenteeism were reported by 20.3% and 62.7% of the participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that menstrual inequities affect a high number of women and PWM in Spain, especially those more socioeconomically deprived, vulnerabilised migrant populations and non-binary and trans menstruators. Findings from this study can be valuable to inform future research and menstrual inequity policies.
RESUMEN: INTRODUCCIóN: Investigación previa disponible indica que la inequidad menstrual tiene un impacto en los resultados de salud (menstrual) y en el bienestar emocional. Es también una barrera para la equidad social y de género. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la inequidad menstrual y las asociaciones con factores sociodemográficos, en mujeres y personas que menstrúan entre 18-55 años en España. MéTODOS: Este es un estudio transversal, basado en una encuesta, llevado a cabo en España entre marzo y julio de 2021. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos y modelos de regresión logística multivariados. RESULTADOS: Los análisis se realizaron con los datos de 22,823 mujeres y personas que menstrúan. Más de la mitad de las participantes habían accedido a servicios sanitarios para la menstruación (60.5%). La probabilidad de acceder a servicios sanitarios para la menstruación fue significativamente más alta en participantes con educación universitaria (aOR: 1.48, 95% CI, 1.13-1.95). El 57.8% informó no haber tenido educación menstrual o que ésta fuera parcial, pre-menarquia; la probabilidad fue más alta en participantes que no habían nacido en países europeos o latinoamericanos (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.93). La pobreza menstrual durante el ciclo vital se reportó en el 22.2-39.9% de las participantes. Los principales factores de riesgo fueron identificarse como persona no binaria (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI, 1.32-2.11), nacer en países fuera de Europa o Latinoamérica (aOR: 2.74, 95% CI, 1.77-4.24), y no tener papeles para residir en España (aOR: 4.27, 95% CI, 1.94-9.38). Tener estudios universitarios (aOR: 0.61, 95% CI, 0.44-0.84) y no haber reportado problemas económicos en los últimos 12 meses (aOR: 0.06, 95% CI, 0.06-0.07) fueron factores protectores para la pobreza menstrual. Además, el 74.6% indicó haber sobreutilizado productos menstruales por no haber tenido acceso a espacios adecuados para el manejo menstrual. El 42.6% de las participantes comunicaron experiencias de discriminación menstrual. Participantes no binarios (aOR: 1.88, 95% CI, 1.52-2.33) y aquellas que no tenían papeles (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI, 1.10-4.03) presentaron una mayor probabilidad de indicar discriminación menstrual. El absentismo laboral y escolar fue indicado por el 18.3% y el 56.6% de las participantes respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestro estudio sugiere que la inequidad menstrual afecta a un número significativo de mujeres y personas que menstrúan en España y, especialmente, a aquellas en situaciones de mayor deprivación socioeconómica, algunos colectivos vulnerabilizados de personas migradas, y a personas no binarias y trans que menstrúan. Los resultados de este estudio pueden ser útiles para investigación futura, así como para el desarrollo de políticas públicas de equidad menstrual.
Assuntos
Menstruação , Discriminação Social , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Educação em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Internet , Produtos de Higiene Menstrual/economia , Produtos de Higiene Menstrual/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Multivariada , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
In the United States, the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionally affected Black, Latinx, and Indigenous populations, immigrants, and economically disadvantaged individuals. Such historically marginalized groups are more often employed in low-wage jobs without health insurance and have higher rates of infection, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19 than non-Latinx White individuals. Mistrust in the health care system, language barriers, and limited health literacy have hindered vaccination rates in minorities, further exacerbating health disparities rooted in structural, institutional, and socioeconomic inequities. In this article, we discuss the lessons learned over the last 2 years and how to mitigate health disparities moving forward.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Desigualdades de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Discriminação Social , Populações Vulneráveis , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Povos Indígenas/psicologia , Povos Indígenas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/etnologia , Pobreza/psicologia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/etnologia , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Discriminação Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Marginalização Social/psicologia , Confiança/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/economia , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/psicologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
This paper examines the issue of employee discrimination after a political crisis: the annexation of Crimea. The annexation, which resulted in a political crisis in Russian-Ukrainian relations, is a setting which allows us to test if a bilateral political issue caused employee discrimination. We use a quasi-experimental approach to examine how the political crisis influenced participation in major sports leagues in Russia and Ukraine. The results show that the employment conditions significantly worsened since the Crimea crisis started.
Assuntos
Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Adulto , Atletas/psicologia , Humanos , Incivilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Racismo/psicologia , Federação Russa , Futebol/psicologia , Futebol/tendências , Ucrânia , Carga de Trabalho/economia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-migration experiences of discriminatory abuse and poverty have been recognized as key risk factors for psychopathology and health problems among children. However, little research has explored these associations among children participating in the internal migration process. Building on the stress and coping framework (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), this study investigated the influence of discriminatory abuse and poverty on depressive symptoms and health problems in a group of Chinese migrant children. It also examined how a culturally based meaning-focused coping, as measured by Chinese beliefs about adversity scale, moderates the stress-distress associations. PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1714 migrant youth (Mean Ageâ¯=â¯13; Rangeâ¯=â¯10-16; 45.6 % Female). METHODS: The latent variable interaction structural equation modeling was conducted to explore the main and interaction effects among studied variables. RESULTS: High prevalence of depressive symptoms (49.6 %) was found for this sample. More than 90% of respondents reported on an average of 0-2 days as being sick over the past 30 days. Migrant youth were found to experience moderate levels of discriminatory abuse (Mâ¯=â¯1.29, SDâ¯=â¯0.51; Rangeâ¯=â¯1-4) and economic stress (Mâ¯=â¯1.38, SDâ¯=â¯1.25; Rangeâ¯=â¯1-4). The findings further revealed that discriminatory abuse and economic stress possessed severe consequences on their mental and physical health. The meaning-focused coping strategy weakened the relationship between discriminatory abuse and depressive symptoms (ß=-0.07, p<.001). Among migrant youth who encountered discriminatory abuse those who adhered more to meaning-focused coping reported less depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Findings shed light on the protective role of cultural factors in stress management for young people from migrant backgrounds.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Depressão , Pobreza/psicologia , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Migrantes/psicologia , Adolescente , Criança , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Cultura , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: (1) Describe financial toxicity (FT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and assess its association with personal/health characteristics and health-related quality of life (HRQOL); (2) examine financial coping mechanisms (savings/loans); (3) assess relationship between COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) and Financial Distress Questionnaire (FDQ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey from January - April 2018 of insured patients at a tertiary multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic who completed primary treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx/hypopharynx. RESULTS: Of 104 survivors, 30 (40.5%) demonstrated high FT. Patients with worse FT were more likely (1) not married (COST, 25.33⯱â¯1.87 vs. 30.61⯱â¯1.34, pâ¯=â¯0.008); (2) of lower education levels (COST, 26.12⯱â¯1.47 vs. 34.14⯱â¯1.47, pâ¯<â¯0.001); and (3) with larynx/hypopharynx primaries (COST, 22.86⯱â¯2.28 vs. 30.27⯱â¯1.50 vs. 32.72⯱â¯1.98, pâ¯=â¯0.005). Younger age (4.23, 95%CI 2.20 to 6.26, pâ¯<â¯0.001), lower earnings at diagnosis (1.17, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.58, pâ¯<â¯0.001), and loss in earnings (-1.80, 95%CI -2.43 to -1.16, pâ¯<â¯0.001) were associated with worse FT. COST was associated with HRQOL (0.08, pâ¯=â¯0.03). Most survivors (63/102, 60%) reported using savings and/or loans. Worse FT was associated with increased likelihood of using more mechanisms (COST, OR1.06, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.10, pâ¯=â¯0.004). Similar results were found with FDQ. CONCLUSIONS: We found differences in FT by primary site, with worst FT in larynx/hypopharynx patients. This finding illuminates potential site-specific factors, e.g. workplace discrimination or inability to return to work, that may contribute to increased risk. FDQ correlates strongly with COST, encouraging further exploration as a clinically-meaningful screening tool.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/economia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Hipofaringe/patologia , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Laringe/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Retorno ao Trabalho/economia , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Desemprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Local de Trabalho/economia , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Past research has documented myriad pernicious psychological effects of high economic inequality, prompting interest into how people perceive, evaluate, and react to inequality. Here we propose, refine, and validate the Support for Economic Inequality Scale (SEIS)-a novel measure of attitudes towards economic inequality. In Study 1, we distill eighteen items down to five, providing evidence for unidimensionality and reliability. In Study 2, we replicate the scale's unidimensionality and reliability and demonstrate its validity. In Study 3, we evaluate a United States version of the SEIS. Finally, in Studies 4-5, we demonstrate the SEIS's convergent and predictive validity, as well as evidence for the SEIS being distinct from other conceptually similar measures. The SEIS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing perceptions of and reactions to economic inequality and provides a useful tool for researchers investigating the psychological underpinnings of economic inequality.
Assuntos
Atitude , Renda , Psicometria , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Percepção , Psicometria/métodos , Psicometria/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autorrelato , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Estigma Social , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
During the 1990s, Brazil and Russia diverged in their policy response to AIDS. This is puzzling considering that both nations were globally integrated emerging economies transitioning to democracy. This article examines to what extent international pressures and partnerships with multilateral donors motivated these governments to increase and sustain federal spending and policy reforms. Contrary to this literature, the cases of Brazil and Russia suggest that these external factors were not important in achieving these outcomes. Furthermore, it is argued that Brazil's policy response was eventually stronger than Russia's and that it had more to do with domestic political and social factors: specifically, AIDS officials' efforts to cultivate a strong partnership with NGOs, the absence of officials' moral discriminatory outlook towards the AIDS community, and the government's interest in using policy reform as a means to bolster its international reputation in health.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/provisão & distribuição , Infecções por HIV/economia , Política de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Discriminação Social/economia , Fármacos Anti-HIV/economia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Comparação Transcultural , Usuários de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental/normas , Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde/tendências , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Agências Internacionais/economia , Agências Internacionais/tendências , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Política , Federação Russa/epidemiologia , Discriminação Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Discriminação Social/tendênciasRESUMO
Although a negative association between obesity and labour market outcomes is commonly reported in many studies, the causal nature of this relationship remains unclear. Using nationally representative longitudinal data from the last six confidential master files (2000/2001-2010/2011) of the National Population Health Survey, we examine the association between obesity and employment participation and earnings among working-age adults in Canada. After controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle factors and time-invariant individual heterogeneity, our results show that obesity is not significantly associated with employment participation but is associated with reduced hourly wage rate and annual income among women by about 4% and 4.5%, respectively. The corresponding results for men show that obesity is associated with about 2% reduction in wage rate and income, but significant at 10% level. However, after controlling for the potential reverse causality bias using the lagged measure of obesity, the effect of obesity on wage rate and income became positive or statistically non-significant. Our findings suggest that obesity is not causally associated with negative labour market outcomes among working-age men in Canada. For working-age women, we find limited evidence of negative labour market outcomes.
Assuntos
Emprego/economia , Obesidade/economia , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Viés , Índice de Massa Corporal , Canadá , Causalidade , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Distribuição por Sexo , Discriminação Social/economia , Medicina Estatal/economiaRESUMO
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the extent to which single women have access to publicly funded fertility treatment. It claims that, despite the fact that great progress has been made in removing gender inequalities in the area of assisted reproduction in England and Wales in recent years, there are points in the regulatory framework that still allow for discrimination against single women. The article builds on recent studies concerning the reforms brought about by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008). However, it focusses on publicly funded treatment, thus directing scholarly attention away from the controversies over the amended s 13(5) HFEA 1990. It argues that the primary reason for remaining inequalities can be traced back to (a) the limitations of the current legislative framework; (b) the ambiguities inherent in the regulatory framework, which in the context of publicly funded fertility treatment is determined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines and Clinical Commissioning Groups and Health Boards' resource allocation policies; and (c) the remaining confusion about the relationship between 'welfare of the child' assessments and eligibility criteria in National Health Service rationing decisions. The article argues that the current regulation does not go far enough in acknowledging the inability of single women to conceive naturally, but at the same time that it struggles to address the fluidity of contemporary familial relationships. The analysis presents an opportunity to contribute to debates about the role of law in shaping the scope of reproductive autonomy, gender equality and social justice.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Discriminação Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos da Mulher/legislação & jurisprudência , Criança , Proteção da Criança/economia , Proteção da Criança/ética , Inglaterra , Pai , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/ética , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/ética , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Pessoa Solteira/legislação & jurisprudência , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/ética , Medicina Estatal/economia , Medicina Estatal/ética , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , País de Gales , Direitos da Mulher/economia , Direitos da Mulher/éticaRESUMO
This paper reviews the economic research on obesity, covering topics such as the measurement of, and trends in, obesity, the economic causes of obesity (e.g. the monetary price and time cost of food, food assistance programs, income, education, macroeconomic conditions, and peer effects), and the economic consequences of obesity (e.g. lower wages, a lower probability of employment, and higher medical care costs). It also examines the extent to which obesity imposes negative externalities, and economic interventions that could potentially internalize such externalities, such as food taxes, subsidies for school-based physical activity programs, and financial rewards for weight loss. It discusses other economic rationales for government intervention with respect to obesity, such as imperfect information, time inconsistent preferences, and irrational behavior. It concludes by proposing a research agenda for the field. Overall, the evidence suggests that there is no single dominant economic cause of obesity; a wide variety of factors may contribute a modest amount to the risk. There is consistent evidence regarding the economic consequences of obesity, which are lower wages and higher medical care costs that impose negative externalities through health insurance. Studies of economic approaches to preventing obesity, such as menu labeling, taxes on energy-dense foods, and financial rewards for weight loss find only modest effects on weight and thus a range of policies may be necessary to have a substantial effect on the prevalence of obesity.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/economia , Fast Foods/economia , Assistência Alimentar/economia , Abastecimento de Alimentos/economia , Obesidade/economia , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Comparação Transcultural , Emprego/economia , Emprego/tendências , Fast Foods/efeitos adversos , Fast Foods/provisão & distribuição , Assistência Alimentar/normas , Assistência Alimentar/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Educação em Saúde/economia , Educação em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Características de Residência , Salários e Benefícios/economia , Salários e Benefícios/tendências , Discriminação Social/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Programas de Redução de Peso/economia , Programas de Redução de Peso/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
The negative implications of living in a socially unequal society are now well documented. However, there is poor understanding of the pathways from specific environmental risk to symptoms. Here we examine the associations between social deprivation, depression, and psychotic symptoms using the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, a cross-sectional dataset including 7,353 individuals. In addition we looked at the mediating role of stress, discrimination, trust and lack of social support. We found that the participants' neighbourhood index of multiple deprivation (IMD) significantly predicted psychosis and depression. On inspection of specific psychotic symptoms, IMD predicted paranoia, but not hallucinations or hypomania. Stress and trust partially mediated the relationship between IMD and paranoid ideation. Stress, trust and a lack of social support fully mediated the relationship between IMD and depression. Future research should focus on the role deprivation and social inequalities plays in specific manifestations of psychopathology and investigate mechanisms to explain those associations that occur. Targeting the mediating mechanisms through appropriate psychological intervention may go some way to dampen the negative consequences of living in an unjust society; ameliorating economic injustice may improve population mental health.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Alucinações/psicologia , Transtornos Paranoides/psicologia , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtorno Bipolar/economia , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/etiologia , Depressão/economia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Feminino , Alucinações/economia , Alucinações/epidemiologia , Alucinações/etiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Paranoides/economia , Transtornos Paranoides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Paranoides/etiologia , Discriminação Social/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estresse Psicológico/economia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Employment sustainability is one of the most pressing issues inflicting people living with HIV (PLHIV). A qualitative approach was used to elucidate the perceived challenges in sustaining their employment and the perceived barriers in re-entering the workforce for HIV patients. In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 patients from an acute hospital in Singapore. The main challenges raised in sustaining employment were: (1) ability to ensure secrecy of diagnosis from employers, (2) ability to secure financial resources for treatment and sustenance, (3) ability to ensure stable health to meet job requirements, (4) ability to cognitively sit with the concerns of uncertainty and limitations in career, and (5) ability to work through discriminatory workplace practices. The perceived barriers in gaining workforce re-entry were: (1) fear of pre-employment medical screening and potential discriminatory practices at workplace, (2) concerns over health (frequent hospital admissions, physical weakness, and existing medical co-morbidities), and (3) psychosocial challenges (unstable accommodation, older age, financial issues, and trade skills limitation). The overarching factor that influences the success of sustaining and securing an employment among HIV patients is secrecy of the diagnosis. The individuals' health status, financial status and access to healthcare, and other psychosocial challenges further compound the issue.
Assuntos
Confidencialidade/psicologia , Revelação , Emprego , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Estigma Social , Adulto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/economia , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Singapura , Discriminação Social/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health care office staff and providers may discriminate against people of low socioeconomic status, even in the absence of economic incentives to do so. We sought to determine whether socioeconomic status affects the response a patient receives when seeking a primary care appointment. METHODS: In a single unannounced telephone call to a random sample of family physicians and general practices (n = 375) in Toronto, Ontario, a male and a female researcher each played the role of a patient seeking a primary care physician. Callers followed a script suggesting either high (i.e., bank employee transferred to the city) or low (i.e., recipient of social assistance) socioeconomic status, and either the presence or absence of chronic health conditions (diabetes and low back pain). We randomized the characteristics of the caller for each office. Our primary outcome was whether the caller was offered an appointment. RESULTS: The proportion of calls resulting in an appointment being offered was significantly higher when the callers presented themselves as having high socioeconomic status than when they presented as having low socioeconomic status (22.6% v.14.3%, p = 0.04) and when the callers stated the presence of chronic health conditions than when they did not (23.5% v. 12.8%, p = 0.008). In a model adjusted for all independent variables significant at a p value of 0.10 or less (presence of chronic health conditions, time since graduation from medical school and membership in the College of Family Physicians of Canada), high socioeconomic status was associated with an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.08) for the offer of an appointment. Socioeconomic status and chronic health conditions had independent effects on the likelihood of obtaining an appointment. INTERPRETATION: Within a universal health insurance system in which physician reimbursement is unaffected by patients' socioeconomic status, people presenting themselves as having high socioeconomic status received preferential access to primary care over those presenting themselves as having low socioeconomic status.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Classe Social , Discriminação Social , Canadá , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
One of the core goals of a universal health care system is to eliminate discrimination on the basis of socioeconomic status. We test for discrimination using patient waiting times for non-emergency treatment in public hospitals. Waiting time should reflect patients' clinical need with priority given to more urgent cases. Using data from Australia, we find evidence of prioritisation of the most socioeconomically advantaged patients at all quantiles of the waiting time distribution. These patients also benefit from variation in supply endowments. These results challenge the universal health system's core principle of equitable treatment.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Discriminação Social/economia , Discriminação Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/economia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Social-class discrimination is evident in many societies around the world, but little is known about its impact on the poor or its role as an explanatory variable in the link between socioeconomic status and health. The current study tested the extent to which perceived discrimination explains socioeconomic gradients in physical health. Participants were 252 adolescents (51% male, 49% female; mean age = 17.51 years, SD = 1.03 years) who participated in Wave 3 of an ongoing longitudinal study focusing on the developmental consequences of rural poverty. Physical health was operationalized as allostatic load, a measure of cumulative wear and tear on the body caused by overactivation of physiological systems that respond to stress. Mediation analyses suggested that 13% of the effect of poverty on allostatic load is explained by perceived discrimination. The findings suggest that social-class discrimination is one important mechanism behind the influence of poverty on physical health.