Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Release in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome/Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy/Sudeck Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical features of classic carpal tunnel syndrome are well known. However, some patients who display atypical symptoms and signs of pain and dysesthesias in the hand, worsening of symptoms at night, and above all, inability to make a full fist, respond equally well to carpal tunnel release. This same clinical picture was shared by some patients labeled as having complex regional pain syndrome. Because of the poor outcome of complex regional pain syndrome patients with current regimens, the authors tested the hypothesis that carpal tunnel release could be effective on them. The purpose of this article is to report the outcome of carpal tunnel release in complex regional pain syndrome patients who presented the above signs and symptoms. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with an average age of 55 years presenting the above cluster of symptoms were operated on. All were unilateral cases, had sustained trauma, and were treated for complex regional pain syndrome before referral for an average of 16 months. All patients underwent carpal tunnel release. RESULTS: At a minimum of 6 months' follow-up, pain dropped 7.5 points on a numerical rating scale of 0 to 10 ( p < 0.001). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scoring fell from 82 to 17 ( p < 0.001). Six patients had an unsatisfactory result. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with complex regional pain syndrome may respond successfully to a carpal tunnel release operation. Recognition of this possibility is crucial, as the symptoms and signs might lead the clinician away from the proper diagnosis and treatment. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Successful treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 of upper limb with cryoneurolysis of the stellate ganglion: A rare case report.

Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) is a multifactorial condition that is related to neural damage, and leads to chronic neuropathic pain. Due to its multifactorial nature, there are many methods that have been recruited for its management. Most of them limit the symptoms to some degree, but the most effective of them so far seems to be blockade of the sympathetic innervation of the region. We present the case of a 71-year-old woman, with an upper limb fracture which was treated conservatively, and later on developed CRPS type I. Analgesic medications and pregabalin were ineffective in controlling her symptoms. Blockade of the stellate ganglion was performed with local anesthetic and dexamethasone. After the stellate ganglion blockade was marked as successful in relieving her symptoms, cryoneurolysis was performed which was very effective. There are not many cases that have been treated with cryoneurolysis, and this is what makes this case interesting.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 after Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures: A Population-based Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence rates of and risk factors for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) after surgery for distal radius fractures (DRFs). Using data from January 2007 to December 2014, we analysed the data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) service. After extracting the data of patients aged ≥18 years whose diagnostic and operation codes for DRFs were entered into the HIRA database, we analysed the incidence rates of and risk factors for CRPS-1. From 2007 to 2014, 172,194 DRFs were treated surgically. Within 1 year postoperatively, 1,103 CRPS-1 cases were diagnosed, with an incidence of 0.64%. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the risk factors that significantly correlated with the incidence of CRPS-1 included female sex, rheumatoid arthritis, open reduction, open fracture, and accompanying ulnar fracture, whereas old age, psychiatric disease, and external fixation were not statistically significant. The incidence of CRPS-1 after surgery for DRF was very low (0.64%) in South Korea. Careful monitoring is necessary for patients with complex fractures and rheumatoid arthritis who are at increased risk of developing CRPS-1.

Risk Factor Analysis of Change in Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring During Cervical Open Door Laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors affecting intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) changes, when such changes take place, and clinical outcomes associated with IONM change during cervical open door laminoplasty (COL) for cervical compressive myelopathy. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, 79 patients who underwent COL with IONM recording were studied. Changes in motor evoked potentials or somatosensory evoked potentials over an alarm criterion were defined as IONM change. Patients with IONM change were assigned to the alarm group, and the others were classified as the control group. Baseline data and radiographic measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Radiologic parameters including maximal compression level (MCL), area and diameter of the spinal canal and ventral compressive lesion, stenosis grade, and occupying ratio of area (ORA) and length at the MCL were measured with magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were assigned to the alarm group and 66 patients were assigned to the control group. Multivariate analysis identified ORA at the MCL (odds ratio, 1.520; 95% confidence interval, 1.192-1.37; P = 0.001) as an independent risk factor for IONM change. Immediately after decompression, the IONM change occurred. One of 4 patients who did not fully recover from the IONM change had postoperative motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS: IONM change during COL occurred immediately after decompression, and a risk factor of IONM change was ORA at the MCL. If the IONM change was not fully recovered, a new motor deficit occurred after COL.

Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: Is trial truly required?

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation has been proven highly effective in the treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). The definitive implantation of a neurostimulator is usually preceded by a therapeutic test (trial), which has the purpose of identifying whether the patient would respond positively to neuromodulation or not. The present study aims to analyze the surgical results of spinal cord stimulation in type 1 CRPS patients who have not undergone trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to August 2017, 160 patients underwent implantation of spinal cord neurostimulator. Out of that total number of surgeries, 33 patients were unequivocally diagnosed with type 1 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and selected for this study. The efficacy of the surgical procedure concerning pain improvement was analyzed through the application of the Pain Disability Index and the Visual Analog Pain Scale. RESULTS: The mean sample age was 48.08 years. The majority of the study subjects were female (66.66%). In respect to the Pain Disability Index, a 65% improvement in disability was observed subsequently to the neurostimulator implantation; in addition, the means of the scores for preoperative and postoperative periods were, respectively, 55 ±â€¯8.69 (p < 0.0001) and 18.90 ±â€¯11.58 (p < 0.0001). Regarding the Visual Analogue Scale, the mean pain in the preoperative period was 9.43 ±â€¯0.77 (p < 0.0001), while the mean in postoperative period was 2.86 ±â€¯2.08 (p < 0.0001). Thus, an average reduction of 70% of painful symptoms was observed after the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: Implantation of a spinal cord neurostimulator presented significant improvement in pain and disability of patients with type 1 CRPS in all cases. These results were obtained following the criteria: 1) patients presenting unequivocal diagnosis of type 1 CRPS; 2) submitted to constant current spinal cord neurostimulator implant; 3) underwent intraoperative tests for precise location of the spinal cord electrode implantation. Therefore, it is possible to suggest that a trial may be unnecessary in that subgroup of patients. Further studies would be required to confirm these findings.

Complex regional pain syndrome type I in children: What is new?

Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I), although first described by the French surgeon Ambroise Paré as far back as the 16th century, nevertheless remains shrouded in mystery. The most common symptoms are pain in an entire hand or foot, allodynia, functional impairment induced by the pain, local oedema and skin color changes and transient sweating abnormalities. Most cases occur after a minor injury (i.e., a sprain or fracture), although there may be no identifiable triggering event, particularly in children. Primarily cold CRPS-I is by far the most common variant in children. Development of the Budapest criteria has benefited the diagnosis. These criteria are clinical and no specific diagnostic investigation is available. In vitro and in vivo studies have established that several pathogenic mechanisms can be involved concomitantly. However, there is no satisfactory explanation to the full clinical spectrum. Blood tests and imaging studies are useful for ruling out other diagnoses then monitoring the course of the condition, which may involve the development of demineralisation or osteopenia. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography may be helpful, as it provides quantitative assessments of the cortical and trabecular bone. CRPS-I has several specific characteristics in children compared to adults and whether the condition is the same entity in these two age groups is a legitimate question. The optimal management involves an early diagnosis followed by a multidisciplinary management programme of functional rehabilitation therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. Analgesics are useful only during the phase of acute pain and to facilitate physical therapy. Studies in adults showed that bisphosphonates were effective within the first 12 months after symptom onset and calcitonin in longer-lasting cases. No high-quality clinical research studies into the aetiopathogenesis and treatment of CRPS-I in children and adolescents are available to date.

Impact of Race and Insurance Status on Surgical Approach for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess factors potentially impacting the operative approach chosen for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients on a nationwide level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CSM is one of the most common spinal disorders treated by spine surgeons, with operative management consisting of three approaches: anterior-only, posterior-only, or combined anterior-posterior. It is unknown whether the operative approach used differs based on patient demographics and/or insurance status. METHODS: The nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2010 was used for analysis. Admissions having a diagnosis code of 721.1 and a primary procedure code of 81.02/81.03, 81.32/81.33, 81.02/81.03, or 81.32/81.33 (combined anterior and posterior fusion/refusion at C2 or below), and 3.09 (decompression of the spinal canal including laminoplasty) were included. Analysis was adjusted for several variables including patient age, race, sex, primary payer for care, and admission source/type. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses revealed that non-white race (black [odds ratio, OR = 1.39; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.32-1.47; P < 0.0001], Hispanic [OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.38-1.66; P < 0.0001], Asian/Pacific Islander [OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.15-1.70; P = 0.0007], Native American [OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.02-1.73; P = 0.037]) and increasing age (OR = 1.03; P < 0.0001) were predictive of receiving posterior-only approaches. Female sex (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.34-1.43; P < 0.0001), private insurance (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.14-1.25; P < 0.0001), and nontrauma center admission type (OR = 1.29-1.39; 95% CI = 1.16-1.56; P < 0.0001) were independently predictive of increased likelihood of receiving an anterior-only approach. Hispanic race (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.14-1.59; P = 0.0004) and admission source (another hospital [OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.20-2.27; P = 0.0023], other health facility [OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.13-2.51; P = 0.011]) were the only variables predictive of increased combined anterior-posterior approaches; Native American race (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.13-0.78; P = 0.013) decreased the likelihood of a combined anterior-posterior approach. CONCLUSION: Private insurance status, female sex, and white race independently predict receipt of anterior-only CSM approaches, whereasd non-white race (black, hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American) and nonprivate insurance predict receiving posterior-only CSM approaches. Given recent literature demonstrating posterior-only approaches as predictive of increased mortality in CSM (Kaye et al, 2015), our findings indicate that for CSM patients, non-white race may significantly increase mortality risk, whereas private insurance status may significantly decrease the risk of mortality. Further prospective study will be needed to more definitively address these issues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Resolution of hypothyroidism after correction of somatovisceral reflex dysfunction by refusion of the cervical spine.

Psychosis is a rare initial presentation of new-onset hypothyroidism. The author describes the case of a 29-year-old woman who presented with psychosis caused by hypothyroidism, or myxedema madness. Although the patient's psychosis resolved after standard monotherapy using levothyroxine sodium, her hypothyroidism persisted. Imaging of the patient's cervical spine showed that previous C5-C6 and C6-C7 fusions had failed. The failed fusions were corrected, and the patient's hypothyroidism resolved, suggesting that the somatovisceral reflex was the cause of the patient's hypothyroidism. Although somatovisceral reflex dysfunctions are rare, physicians should consider them as potential underlying causes of their patients' presenting medical conditions.

Peripheral nerve pathology in patients with severely affected complex regional pain syndrome type I.

Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) is a chronic pain syndrome with no clinical evidence of nerve injury; however, recently, changes in muscle tissue have been found in case of CRPS-I. Our aim was to search for histological changes in peripheral nerves of amputated limbs from patients with therapy-resistant CRPS-I that could justify muscle tissue changes. Fifteen patients with CRPS-I (duration >1 year) were included. Multiple nerve samples were taken from upper (n=4) and lower (n=11) amputated limbs. Histological changes (signs of nerve fiber loss and regeneration), fiber diameters, fiber diameter distribution, and fiber density were studied through microscopy and morphometry. Samples from three healthy sural nerves were used as control data as well as data from the literature. All patients (93% of tissue samples) showed histological signs of nerve fiber loss and fiber regeneration, varying in severity. No specific preference was found for any nerve or the location within the nerve. Sural nerves showed loss of especially larger nerve fibers (>12 µm) in comparison with control data. Sympathectomy did not influence this finding. The morphometric results of the other nerves are more difficult to interpret because of the absence of good-quality control data from the literature. However, the percentages of nerve fibers greater than 12 µm seem to lie within the normal range. Besides the known pathology of thin nerve fibers innervating the skin or blood vessels in CRPS-I, this study also shows pathological changes more proximal in the nerves, especially in the sural nerve.

A curative treatment option for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type I: dorsal root entry zone operation (report of two cases).

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I) is a debated health problem concerning its pathophysiology and treatment strategies. A 12-year-old boy and a 35-year-old woman were diagnosed with CRPS-I at different times. They had previously undergone various types of interventions with no success. After one year of follow-up and observation, DREZ lesioning operation was performed. Afterwards, both cases had transient lower extremity ataxia. The first case was followed for 60 months with no recurrence and total cure. The second case was pain-free until the 6th month, when she required psychological support; she was followed for 33 months with partial satisfactory outcome. Although not a first-line option, DREZ lesioning procedure can be chosen and may be a curative option in selected cases of CRPS-I who are unresponsive to conventional therapies.

Resilience in patients with amputation because of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I.

PURPOSE: Although controversial, an amputation for longstanding and therapy-resistant Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I) may improve quality of life and pain intensity. Resilience, the way people deal with adversity in a positive way may be related to these positive outcomes. This study focused on the relationship between resilience and post-amputation outcomes, i.e. quality of life, pain and recurrence of CRPS-I and psychological distress. METHOD: Twenty-six patients with an amputation related to CRPS-I filled in the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), World Health Organisation -- Quality of life Assessment (WHOQOL-Bref) and the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R). An interview was conducted and a physical examination performed. Results were compared with reference groups from literature and a control group from the outpatient rehabilitation clinic at our medical center. RESULTS: Resilience correlated significantly with all domains of the WHOQOL-Bref (ρ ranged from 0.41 to 0.72) and negatively with all domains of the SCL-90-R (ρ ranged from -0.39 to -0.68). Patients with an amputation because of CRPS-I have higher scores on resilience and quality of life than the control group. Resilience was lower in patients who reported CRPS-I symptoms compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed our hypothesis that patients with an amputation because of CRPS-I who have a higher resilience also have a higher quality of life and experience lower psychological distress. The prognostic value of resilience in this patient group requires further research. Implications for Rehabilitation Until characteristics of patients with positive quality of life outcome have been further unraveled, amputation for CRPS-I should only be performed in expertise centers. Resilience, the process of adapting well in the face of adversity, should be further explored in Rehabilitation Medicine research in general. Measurement of resilience should be a standard procedure when patients with CRPS-I request an amputation. Improving resilience of patients in in- and outpatient rehabilitation clinics might be an additional treatment in rehabilitation care.

Increasing back and radicular pain 2 years following intrathecal pump implantation with review of arachnoiditis.

BACKGROUND: Implanted intrathecal drug delivery pumps are now regularly used for the treatment of chronic benign and cancer-related pain that is refractory to conservative treatment methods. In most cases, the pumps are successful at reducing the intensity of pain and improving function and quality of life for pain patients. Limited studies have discussed the complications associated with intrathecal pump placement. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. SUMMARY: We describe an unusual case of a patient who presented with progressive weakness and worsening lumbar and lower extremity pain following implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS). Work-up for the patient's symptoms includes a magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed lumbar arachnoiditis. Patient underwent a laminectomy and detethering of spinal cord and nerve roots below level of catheter insertion. There was transient improvement in her pain and weakness. Subsequent surgery for pump explantation revealed a retained Touhy introducer needle from her pump placement procedure. CONCLUSION: The entire IDDS was removed including the retained Touhy introducer needle. The patient later went on to receive a successful spinal cord stimulator trial and implantation with moderate relief of her chronic pain.

Cocaine use and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.

The purpose of this study was to determine the average age of individuals diagnosed with cervical spinal myelopathy who are known cocaine users vs nonusers, as well as the postoperative change in neurological condition between cocaine users and nonusers. Medical records of patients diagnosed with cervical spinal myelopathy between January 1990 and May 2006 were reviewed. Ninety-four patients were identified who underwent any surgical intervention with at least 2 years of follow-up. Group 1 comprised patients with cervical spinal myelopathy who had used cocaine, and group 2 comprised patients with cervical spinal myelopathy who had not used cocaine. All patients were clinically evaluated by the Nurick grade preoperatively and at most recent follow-up. Mean follow-up was 25 months. Mean age at presentation was 52 years (range, 44-62 years) in group 1 and 56 years (range, 42-88 years) in group 2. Average duration of symptoms prior to surgical intervention was 18.6 months in group 1 and 10 months in group 2. Average Nurick grade at presentation was 2.7 for group 1 and 2.7 for group 2. Average postoperative Nurick grade was 1.9 for group 1 and 1.33 for group 2. Change in Nurick grade was 0.8 for group 1 and 1.11 for group 2. Linear regression analysis comparing change in Nurick grade (from pre- to postoperative) was conducted, showing a correlation of -0.45 with a P value of .044. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that cocaine use has an effect on postoperative improvement of neurological function in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

[The surgeon's viewpoint concerning Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1]. / Le vécu de l'algoneurodystrophie ou syndrome douloureux régional complexe de type 1 par le chirurgien.

The complex regional pain syndrome type 1 from the surgeon's point of view: description of the symptoms, imaging (nuclear medicine, MRI) and of the associated psychological context. Importance of the need for a multi-disciplinary organization from the diagnostic to the therapeutic care.

Amputation for long-standing, therapy-resistant type-I complex regional pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with long-standing, therapy-resistant type-I complex regional pain syndrome consider an amputation. There is a lack of evidence regarding the risk of recurrence of the pain syndrome and patient outcomes after amputation. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the impact of an amputation on pain, participation in daily life activities, and quality of life as well as the use of a prosthesis and the risk of recurrence of the pain syndrome in patients with long-standing, therapy-resistant type-I complex regional pain syndrome. METHODS: From May 2000 to October 2008, twenty-two patients underwent an amputation of a nonfunctional limb at our institution because of long-standing, therapy-resistant type-I complex regional pain syndrome. Twenty-one of these patients were included in our study. The median age was forty-six years (interquartile range [IQR], thirty-seven to fifty-one years), the median duration of the complex regional pain syndrome was six years (IQR, two to ten years), and the median interval between the amputation and the study was five years (IQR, three to seven years). A semistructured interview was conducted, physical examination of the residual limb was performed, and the patients completed two questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty patients (95%) reported an improvement in their lives. Nineteen patients (90%) reported a reduction in pain, seventeen patients (81%) reported an improvement in mobility, and fourteen (67%) reported an improvement in sleep. Eighteen of the twenty-one patients stated that they would choose to undergo an amputation again under the same circumstances. Ten of the fifteen patients with a lower-limb amputation and one of the six with an upper-limb amputation regularly used a prosthesis. The type-I complex regional pain syndrome recurred in the residual limb of three patients (14%) and symptoms recurred in another limb in two patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Amputation may positively contribute to the lives of patients with long-standing, therapy-resistant type-I complex regional pain syndrome. Patients were likely to use a prosthesis after a lower-limb amputation. The risk of recurrence of the type-I complex regional pain syndrome was 24%.

[The efficacy of hand desimpatization after sympatectomy by complex regional pain syndrome].

64 patients operated on the reason of complex regional hand pain syndrome were examined with the use of laser spectral Doppler flowmetry and thermography. 33 patients had thoracoscopic Th3 ganglion clipation; 16 patients had brachial artery and vein perivascular sympathectomy; 15 patients periarterial sympathectomy on the level of brachial artery. Desympathisation (microcirculatory hemodynamic improvement and trophotropic microcirculation regulatory changes) was mostly apparent after thoracoscopic clipation and perivascular desympatisation in comparison with isolated periarterial sympatectomy.

Therapy-resistant complex regional pain syndrome type I: to amputate or not?

BACKGROUND: Amputation for the treatment of long-standing, therapy-resistant complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) is controversial. An evidence-based decision regarding whether or not to amputate is not possible on the basis of current guidelines. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the literature and summarize the beneficial and adverse effects of an amputation for the treatment of long-standing, therapy-resistant CRPS-I. METHODS: A literature search, using MeSH terms and free text words, was performed with use of PubMed and EMBASE. Original studies published prior to January 2010 describing CRPS-I as a reason for amputation were included. The reference lists of the identified studies were also searched for additional relevant studies. Studies were assessed with regard to the criteria used to diagnose CRPS-I, level of amputation, amputation technique, rationale for the level of amputation, reason for amputation, recurrence of CRPS-I after the amputation, phantom pain, prosthesis fitting and use, and patient functional ability, satisfaction, and quality of life. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty articles were identified, and twenty-six studies with Level-IV evidence (involving 111 amputations in 107 patients) were included. Four studies applied CRPS-I diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Bruehl et al., or Veldman et al. Thirteen studies described symptoms without noting whether the patient met diagnostic criteria for CRPS-I, and nine studies stated the diagnosis only. The primary reasons cited for amputation were pain (80%) and a dysfunctional limb (72%). Recurrence of CRPS-I in the stump occurred in thirty-one of sixty-five patients, and phantom pain occurred in fifteen patients. Thirty-six of forty-nine patients were fitted with a prosthesis, and fourteen of these patients used the prosthesis. Thirteen of forty-three patients had paid employment after the amputation. Patient satisfaction was reported in eight studies, but the nature of the satisfaction was often not clearly indicated. Changes in patient quality of life were reported in three studies (fifteen patients); quality of life improved in five patients and the joy of life improved in another six patients. CONCLUSIONS: The previously published studies regarding CRPS-I as a reason for amputation all represent Level-IV evidence, and they do not clearly delineate the beneficial and adverse affects of an amputation performed for this diagnosis. Whether to amputate or not in order to treat long-standing, therapy-resistant CRPS-I remains an unanswered question.

[Amputation of the hand as last resort in severe complex regional pain syndrome]. / Amputation der Hand als Ultima ratio bei schwerstem komplexen regionalen Schmerzsyndrom.

In very rare cases, a complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) of the hand can take a serious, chronic, incurable course. We describe the case of a 36-year-old patient who after reconstruction of a scaphoid fracture developed such a condition. 9 years after the operation an amputation of the hand was performed at the request of the patient after various expert opinions had been obtained and legal action against the insurance provider was successfully concluded. Amputation of the hand can be discussed as a last resort for relief of suffering in cases of severe CRPS I.