Association between colonic diverticulosis and bowel symptoms: A case-control study of 1629 Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether diverticulosis, absent inflammation, is responsible for chronic bowel symptoms. We examined the association between bowel symptoms and asymptomatic diverticulosis. METHOD: This case-control study included 543 patients with diverticulosis and 1086 age and sex-matched controls (1:2) without diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy. Eleven symptoms (abdominal discomfort, hunger discomfort, borborygmus, abdominal distension, flatus, constipation, diarrhea, loose stools, hard stools, fecal urgency, and incomplete evacuation) were evaluated using a gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale (GSRS) at baseline and second questionnaire. Associations between diverticulosis and symptoms were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95 confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, constipation (OR, 0.85 [0.78-0.93]) and hard stools (OR, 0.86 [0.78-0.94]) were negatively associated with diverticulosis. The other nine symptoms showed no association with diverticulosis. Diverticulosis was negatively associated with constipation (OR, 0.93 [0.74-0.93]), hard stools (OR, 0.85 [0.76-0.96]), and incomplete evacuation (OR, 0.88 [0.79-0.99]) in males, and positively associated with diarrhea (OR, 1.39 [1.14-1.69]) and loose stools (OR, 1.28 [1.05-1.55]) in females. No bowel symptoms were positively associated with any of right-sided, left-sided, or bilateral diverticulosis. Test-retest reliability of GSRS (mean interval, 4.4 months) was moderate (Mean Kappa, 0.568) in males and good (Mean Kappa, 0.652) in females. CONCLUSIONS: This large, colonoscopy-based, case-control study demonstrated that neither constipation nor hard stools were associated with an increased risk of diverticulosis, regardless of diverticulum location. In females, but not males, diarrhea and loose stools were positively associated with diverticulosis. Long-term test-retest reliability suggested that these symptoms remain consistent over a given period.

Quality of life in ostomized patients.

BACKGROUND: Ostomized patients usually have some concerns such as absence of sphincter control, noisy bowel movements, changes in passage of gas, social discomfort due to odors, concerns about bag filling, peristomal and skin irritation as well as psychological changes such as body image distortion, among others, that will determine quality of life. We undertook this study to measure quality of life in ostomized patients attending the Coloproctology Unit in Hospital General de México. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional descriptive study from January 1, 2009 to May 29, 2009 in ostomized patients. Two scales were used to determine quality of life. The first was quality of life SF-36 (version 2) with 36 items that measured eight aspects. The other scale used was the Montreux scale. RESULTS: For the Montreux scale, quality of life section, a range between 60.8 and 81.2 points was obtained. The results obtained with the quality of life scale SF36 were as follows: physical function, 67.04; physical role, 56.06; physical pain, 68.28; general health, 57.16; with an overall average of 62.14 points. For mental aspects, results were as follows: vitality, 68.37; social function, 71.53; emotional role, 71.48; and mental health, 68.67; with an overall average of 70.01 points. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life of subjects included was classified as good. Fear of stoma leaks and sexual function were the aspects that most affected the patients, and those are responsible for a decrease in quality of life in this study.

Long-term outcome and health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open colectomy for benign disease.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) vs open colectomy (OC) for the treatment of benign disease have not yet been clearly demonstrated with regard to long-term consequences and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this study was to compare LC and OC in terms of outcome and HRQL and to determine whether a generic nonspecific instrument for HRQL assessment is valid in postoperative follow-up. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who underwent LC for elective right hemicolectomy (RH) or sigmoid resection (SR) for benign polyps or uncomplicated diverticular disease between 1992 and 2000 were evaluated and compared to 50 controls treated by OC in the same period. All patients were evaluated by postal questionnaire to determine recurrence rates and surgery-related complications. HRQL was assessed by the SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Score (PCS, MCS) and by the SF-36 Health Survey, which measures eight different health-quality domains, including physical and social functioning (PF, SF), general health perception (GH), physical and emotional role limitations (RP, RE), body pain (BP), vitality (VT), and mental health (MH). RESULTS: The LC and OC patients were similar in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and diagnosis. There were significant differences between the two groups in resection type (26 RH:23 SR in LC vs 16 RH:34 SR in OC, p = 0.03) and length of follow-up (median, 39 and 53.5 months, respectively, p = 0.04), but neither parameter was predictive of the main SF-36 scores (PCS and MCS). There were no differences between the groups in recurrence rates (8% in LC vs 11% in OC) or surgery-related complications, including incisional hernias (16.3% in LC vs 17% in OC) and small bowel obstructions (2% in LC vs 10.4% in OC). None of the eight SF-36 Health Survey domains or the PCS or MCS scores showed significant differences between LC and OC patients in HRQL. However, occurrence of hernia after surgery was predictive of lower SF-36 scores, specifically in PF (p = 0.047), GH (p = 0.045), SF (p = 0.047), MH (p = 0.041), and MCS (p = 0.037). In addition, small bowel obstruction was significantly associated with lower scores in BP (p = 0.008), GH (p = 0.008), SF (p = 0.013), RE (p = 0.026), MH (p = 0.003), and MCS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: LC was not different from OC for selected indications that measure long-term outcome and HRQL. SF-36 appears to be an appropriate instrument to measure postoperative HRQL, showing responsiveness to changes in objective outcome measures.