Infection-related Hospitalizations During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Without Immunosuppressants.

Immunosuppressants are increasingly being used in the clinic to manage immune-related adverse effects. Consequently, the incidence of secondary infections associated with immunosuppression is increasing. However, little is known about primary infections during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment without immunosuppressants. We aimed to evaluate primary infectious diseases during antiprogrammed death ligand-1 immunotherapy without immunosuppressants. We retrospectively screened medical records of 233 patients who underwent ICI treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer between January 2014 and May 2018 at National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea. Subsequently, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of selected patients hospitalized for potential infectious disease without immunosuppressive treatment (n=80). Eight cases (3.4%) were identified as bacterial pneumonia (n=5) and cellulitis, inflamed epidermoid cyst, and wound infection (n=1 each). The bacterial pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were identified in 4 patients with pneumonia. The period between the start of ICI treatment and infection varied between 3 and 189 days (median, 24.5 days). Five (62.5%) patients were infected within a month after ICI treatment initiation. All patients were treated with empirical antibiotics and discharged without complications. The median progression-free and overall survival for ICI treatment was 11.5 and 25.5 months, respectively. Six patients experienced ICI-associated adverse effects postinfection: Herpes zoster infection (n=4) and pneumonitis (n=2). Infectious disease independent of immunosuppression is a rare, but possible event in patients with lung cancer receiving ICI treatment. Clinical awareness would enable prompt diagnosis of primary infection during immunotherapy.

Italian oncologists and vaccinations against infectious diseases: Results of a survey of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer present a higher risk of vaccine-preventable diseases. Recommended vaccinations are the most cost-effective measure to reduce the risk of transmission and related complications. Nevertheless, vaccination rates are inadequate. Oncologists have a central role in tailored vaccine communication to their patients. We present the results of a survey conducted by AIOM in 2022, focusing on the perception of the problem by oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous 31-item online questionnaire was shared on 15 September 2022 on the AIOM website. The objectives of this survey were to examine the perception of Italian oncologists on vaccine-preventable diseases and the main available vaccines, their attitude towards recommending vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on their habits regarding vaccine-preventable diseases. RESULTS: Between September 2022 and January 2023, 114 medical oncologists (5% of the members) completed the anonymous questionnaire. At the first oncological visit, only 30% of respondents usually propose a vaccination schedule to all their patient, 41% do not usually discuss vaccinations at the first visit and 29% recommend vaccines exclusively to specific categories of patients. For 56% of respondents, patients are more aware of the benefits of vaccines, whereas 36% reported that patients are worried of receiving too many vaccines. CONCLUSION: This is the first survey conducted among Italian oncologists to better understand the perception and attitudes towards the vaccination. It highlights the urgent issues of educating and training oncologists in vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccine awareness and the need to build (or implement) a network of multidisciplinary collaborations.

Maternal Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Pregnancy and Infectious Disease in Offspring Younger Than 5 Years: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Maternal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during pregnancy may be associated with increased susceptibility to infection in offspring. We aimed to assess this association, taking into consideration the mediating role of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) agents and adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all live-born singletons born in Denmark during 1995-2016 (n = 1,343,960). The exposure was maternal IBD. Main outcome of interest was offspring infection younger than 5 years, defined by either infection-related hospitalization or systemic antibiotic prescription, whose corresponding risk estimates were hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs), respectively. We applied an inverse probability-weighted marginal structural model for mediation analysis. RESULTS: Offspring born to mothers with Crohn's disease (CD) had an 18% increased risk of infection-related hospitalization (HR 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.26) and a 16% increased frequency of prescribed antibiotics (IRR 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.21). Anti-TNFα agents could explain 10% and 3% of the 2 estimated total associations, respectively, while a composite of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age could explain 4% and 0%, respectively. The association between prenatal anti-TNFα and frequency of antibiotics attenuated after additional adjustment for maternal CD (IRR from 1.23 [0.98-1.55] to 1.10 [0.87-1.40]). Maternal ulcerative colitis, however, was not associated with offspring infection. DISCUSSION: Maternal CD, but not ulcerative colitis, was associated with an increased risk of infection in offspring younger than 5 years, of which adverse birth outcomes and anti-TNFα had a minor role. The association between anti-TNFα agents and pediatric infection could be partially explained by maternal CD.

The Proton Pump Inhibitors Use and COVID-19 from Prior to Vaccination Perspective: A Review.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been a huge challenge, affecting directly or indirectly the human race worldwide. Many COVID-19-related risk factors have been identified. Various drugs, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), have been claimed to increase the risk of acquiring or affecting the outcome of COVID-19 prior to the availability of vaccines. The aim of this review was to summarize the uncertain role of PPI use on the SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 clinical course, including both some well-established and presumptive indications to these potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion, before vaccinations against COVID-19 were implemented on a massive scale. SUMMARY: Although iatrogenic hypochlorhydria alters human microbiota and impairs the nonspecific innate immunity, increasing the likelihood of gastrointestinal and pulmonary infections, published data on the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are quite inconclusive. On the contrary, the beneficial role of PPI use in the prevention of the upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly in at-risk patients receiving dual antiplatelet treatment and/or concomitant anticoagulation, constituting a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients, has been well-documented. Furthermore, PPIs have been marked as a potential antiviral remedy, just like many already existing repurposed drugs, that merit further studies in search of successful anti-CO-VID-19 pharmacotherapy. KEY MESSAGES: The controversial role of PPIs on the SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity propounded in the past should not prevent the use of these potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion in well-established clinical indications.

A Proposal for Addiction and Infectious Diseases Specialist Collaboration to Improve Care for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder and Injection Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis.

ABSTRACT: Patients with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis and opioid use disorder often receive treatment for the infection that fails to address its underlying cause. People who inject drugs (PWID) and develop serious infections also face disparities in antibiotic management, particularly with regards to use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). We highlight literature on OPAT in PWID challenging the notion that PWID cannot be managed with OPAT. Given that OPAT use amongst PWID and non-PWID yields similar outcomes, we argue that a bias against OPAT use in PWID is unwarranted and may reflect stigma rather than data. We further note the proven value of comprehensive OUD treatment on endocarditis treatment outcomes, which also addresses the potential safety concerns of OPAT in PWID, and propose a treatment model in which Addiction and Infectious Disease specialists collaborate to integrate opioid use disorder treatment into injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis care.

Retrospective drug utilization review of meropenem and role of infectious disease pharmacist in specialized cancer care hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem antimicrobials are considered for the treatment of serious bacterial infections. The objective of this study was to review the use of meropenem in cancer patients and to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist's intervention in this practice to reduce possible risks associated with use of meropenem. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted among 100 patients who received meropenem at hospital. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the collected data. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in this retrospective study with aim to review rationality and possible side effects associated with meropenem use in our study population. It was revealed that meropenem used was associated with rise in bilirubin in many of our study patients. Pharmacist were found to be instrumental in placing timely interventions for either de-escalation or switch of meropenem to imipenem/cilastatin to reduce that risk. Interventions were accepted by physicians in most of the cases. CONCLUSION: De-escalation and switching were performed in accordance with pharmacist recommendations in more than half of study population with empirically started/ study population in which meropenem was used.

[Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies: first Part]. / Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados. Parte I.

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.

[Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies.Screening of hepatitis B in high risk Chilean and immigrant pregnant women: Management of mother to child transmission Second part: Chilean Guidelines for Prevention of Infections associated to use of Biological Therapies (PREVITEB)]. / Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados.Parte II: Guía clínica chilena de Prevención de Infecciones Asociadas al Uso de Terapias Biológicas (PREVITEB).

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of 2 manuscripts. This second part is a guideline that details these recommendations through screening strategies, prophylactic therapies and vaccines indications for bacterial, mycobacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections, both for adults and children.

Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados. Parte I / Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies: first Part

Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre estas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta primera parte detalla los riesgos de desarrollar complicaciones infecciosas dependiendo del tipo de biológico utilizado para determinada patología. La revisión incluyó búsqueda amplia en MEDLINE y Epistemonikos de revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis de estudios clínicos controlados y caso/control que examinaban infecciones posteriores al tratamiento con anti-TNF alfa, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig y anti-integrinas. Esta búsqueda se complementó con revisión de cohortes multicéntricas de usuarios de biológicos, del MMWR del CDC, Atlanta, E.U.A. y de registros nacionales y/o de sociedades científicas en la que se hiciera mención a complicaciones infecciosas derivadas del uso de biológicos.

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.

Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados. Parte II: Guía clínica chilena de Prevención de Infecciones Asociadas al Uso de Terapias Biológicas (PREVITEB) / Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies. Screening of hepatitis B in high risk Chilean and immigrant pregnant women: Management of mother to child transmission Second part: Chilean Guidelines for Prevention of Infections associated to use of Biological Therapies (PREVITEB)

Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre éstas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta segunda parte corresponde a la guía clínica que detalla estas recomendaciones mediante estrategias de cribado, terapias profilácticas e indicación de vacunas, según corresponde, para infecciones bacterianas, y por micobacterias en particular, virus, hongos y parásitos, tanto para adultos como para niños.

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of 2 manuscripts. This second part is a guideline that details these recommendations through screening strategies, prophylactic therapies and vaccines indications for bacterial, mycobacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections, both for adults and children.

Emerging concerns of infectious diseases in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUNDS: Cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has received a remarkable amount of attention in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The unique adverse effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are not known however, and neither is the incidence of infectious disease among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence of infections during nivolumab treatment, and the risk factors associated with infections. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients who received nivolumab in two teaching hospitals (National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center and Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan) between December 2015 and June 2017. We counted any infectious diseases occurring at any time after the initiation of nivolumab until 3 months after its discontinuation. In the current study, "infectious disease" was defined as any infection requiring the administration of any antimicrobial agent. RESULTS: Of a total of 167 NSCLC patients reviewed, 32 (19.2%) experienced infectious diseases. Of the 33 infections in 32 patients, 25 were bacterial, 2 were fungal, and 6 were viral. Twenty-seven of the patients with infections used corticosteroids during their treatment course. There was no statistically significant difference in the use of immunosuppressive agents between patients with and without infections. A history of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with infection (odds ratio 3.61, 95% confidence interval 1.14-11.4, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer patients receiving nivolumab have a certain level of risk for developing infectious diseases. In the current study, a history of diabetes mellitus was an independent risk factor for infectious disease development. Clinicians should pay attention to occult infectious diseases in patients receiving lung cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially those with the history of diabetes mellitus.

The influence of polymorphisms in the drug transporter, ABCB1 on the toxicity of glucocorticoids in Saudi children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids play essential roles in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL); however, treatment with these agents can result in severe side-effects. This study, the first of its kind in a Saudi population, investigates associations of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms (pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic) with the development of toxicity and side effects (glucose abnormality, liver toxicity and infection) in a small population of Saudi children with ALL. METHODS: Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the ABCB1 gene (rs 3213619 T129C, rs 2032582 G2677T and rs1045642 C3435T) were analysed in 70 Saudi children with ALL and 60 control subjects. Participants were treated according to the ALL 2000 study protocol. Toxicities were assessed and associations with genotypes were evaluated according to Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC). RESULTS: Significant associations were observed among carriers and the mutated genotype C3435T (ABCB1), which had an incidence of infection (p = 0.05). Although no correlations were found between liver toxicity and glucose abnormalities for patients carrying ABCB1 SNPs, risk factors for liver toxicity were elevated by a factor of three for patients carrying the SNP G2677T, OR 3.00 (1.034-8.702). The risk factor of glucose abnormality toxicity for the patients carring T129C were increased three times OR 3.06 (0.486-19.198). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of infection incidence, polymorphism C3435T may contribute to potential life-threatening infections during paediatric ALL therapy, through glucocorticoid usage.

Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: results from the ENEIDA registry.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of vedolizumab in real world clinical practice is unknown. AIM: To evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Patients who received at least 1 induction dose of vedolizumab were included. Effectiveness was defined based on Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) in Crohn's disease (CD) and Partial Mayo Score (PMS) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Short-term response was assessed at week 14. Variables associated with short-term remission were identified by logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the long-term durability of vedolizumab treatment. Cox model was used to identify factors associated with discontinuation of treatment and loss of response. RESULTS: 521 patients were included (median follow-up 10 months [interquartile range 5-18 months]). At week 14, 46.8% had remission and 15.7% clinical response. CD (vs UC), previous surgery, higher CRP concentration and disease severity at baseline were significantly associated with impaired response. The rate of vedolizumab discontinuation was 37% per patient-year of follow-up (27.6% in UC and 45.3% in CD, P < 0.01). CD (vs UC), anaemia at baseline, steroids during induction and CRP concentration were associated with lower durability of treatment. Seven per cent of patients developed adverse events, infections being the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Over 60% of IBD patients respond to vedolizumab. Many patients discontinue treatment over time. CD and disease burden impair both short- and long-term response. Vedolizumab seems to be safe in clinical practice.

Methotrexate intoxication: Beyond the adverse events.

AIM: Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, this anchor may cause some side effects that may range from nausea to mortality. The clinical features of MTX toxicity are under-researched. In this study, we aimed to find out the potential predisposing factors and outcomes of the MTX toxicity (n = 31). METHODS: The data were collected from 31 patients whose ages ranged from 25 to 81 years, who were suffering from immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and major MTX-related toxicity. RESULTS: Out of 31 patients, six (19.4%) used MTX every day, and 13 (41.9%) patients had renal insufficiency who were admitted to the hospital because of mucositis (90.3%) and fever (71%). While using MTX, 27 patients (87.1%) were discharged after the treatment and four patients (12.9%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Although MTX has high efficacy for the toxicity ratio, wrong use and dosage of MTX may be harmful to patients. Thus, patients should be informed about the proper use of MTX.

[Infections during Immunosuppression]. / Infektionen unter Immunsuppression.

Infections during Immunosuppression Abstract. Immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies are being used more and more frequently. Depending on the mechanism of action and the underlying disease, there is an increased risk of infection with these therapies. In everyday clinical practice, the individual risk of infection depends on a large number of patients, and environmental as well as pathogen-specific factors. Elderly and multimorbid patients are at particular risk of infection. Classical bacterial infections with possible atypical manifestation, hepatitis B virus, herpes viruses, mycobacteria and other granulomatous infections are prevalent. Typical clinical signs of infections may be missing and laboratory chemical parameters may fail as diagnostic tools. Systematic screening for latent or chronic infections prior to initiation and close monitoring of patients during immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Analysis of the risk of infection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel therapies.

We studied the risk of infections in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL). Major infections were defined as requiring hospital admission or intravenous antimicrobial treatment. Incidence rate (IR) ratios (IRR) were used to compare infection rates. Of 263 CLL patients followed for 936.9 person-years, 60% required treatment for progressive CLL (66 received ibrutinib). Infections occurred in 71.9% patients (IR 92.4/100 person-years) with 31.9% having major infections (IR 20.3/100 person-years) and infections causing 37.5% of deaths. CLL treatment was associated with significantly higher risk of major (IRR 3.31, 95% CI 2.10, 5.21) and minor (IRR 1.78, 95% CI 1.43, 2.22) infections. Compared to their previous chemoimmunotherapy patients receiving salvage ibrutinib therapy (n = 47) had a significantly increased risk of a major infection (IRR 2.35 95% CI 1.27, 4.34). The risk of infection in CLL patients remains high even with use of less immunosuppressive therapies.

The impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis in morbidity and infections during azacitidine treatment.

The clinical consequences of the infectious events in patients receiving azacitidine are poorly documented. Likewise, the role of primary antimicrobial prophylaxis is unknown. In this retrospective, single-center study, we compare the impact of prophylaxis on the incidence of infection and morbidity in all consecutive higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, during the first 4 azacitidine cycles. Seventy-six patients, corresponding to 283 azacitidine cycles, were studied. There were infectious events in 43% of the patients. Development of infections led to more hospital admissions, increased red blood cells and platelet requirements, and a delay in subsequent cycles. Median overall survival was comparable between patients with or without infections. In the multivariate analysis, a neutrophil count below 0.5 × 109/L (OR 12.5 [2.6-50]) and antimicrobial prophylaxis (OR 0.1 [0.02-04]) were independent factors for the development of infection. We conclude that infectious events have a significant impact in the early clinical course of azacitidine-treated patients by increasing hospital admissions and transfusion requirements. Antimicrobial prophylaxis may prevent infections, leading to a decreased need for supportive care in these patients with poor outcome.

Infection and Malignancy Risk in Patients Treated with TNF Inhibitors for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Infectious and malignant events are responsible for morbidity and mortality in patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs). Anti-tumor necrosis factor (Anti-TNF) agents appear to have an impact, however the individual effect of these agents in the different conditions is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to estimate the Incidence Rates (IR) of infections and malignancies in patients treated with anti-TNFs across different IMIDs, as well as potential risk factors. METHODS: IR/100 patient-years were evaluated in adult patients treated for any IMID with an anti-TNF between January 2000 and December 2014. Predictors were tested with bivariate and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: The IR/100 patient-years of serious infections was 4.02 (95% CI 3.20-5.04) with significant differences across IMIDs and anti-TNF agents. The most frequent site of serious infection was the gastrointestinal system. Five cases [IR of 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.66) /100 patient-years] of tuberculosis were diagnosed, exclusively in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies. Three (60%) of those were extrapulmonary. The IR/100 patient-years of malignancy was 1.75 (95% CI 1.24-2-47). CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the IR of infections across indications and agents. Thus, physicians should be thoughtful when generalizing data from literature regarding the use of an anti-TNF agent in a specific IMID. Further studies are necessary to clear aspects regarding the safety of individual anti-TNF biologics and to clarify their impact in the different IMIDs.