Postoperative Late Hearing Deterioration in Cholesteatoma with Labyrinthine Fistulas.

A labyrinthine fistula is a severe complication of middle ear cholesteatoma that can cause profound sensorineural hearing loss and vertigo. However, there is no consensus regarding the transition to postoperative hearing. Although hearing deteriorates gradually with a delay in some cases of labyrinthine fistula, insufficient consideration has been given to this point. We examined perioperative changes in cases of middle ear cholesteatoma with labyrinthine fistulas. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 578 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma who underwent tympanoplasty at our hospital between 2016 and 2021. Patients with labyrinthine fistulas were selected; their perioperative bone-conduction hearing was assessed. Fistula depth was determined following the classification reported by Dornhoffer et al. The hearing was compared preoperatively, early postoperatively (3-6 months), and 1 year postoperatively. Forty-eight patients (8.3%) had labyrinthine fistulas. Regarding depth, 21 cases were type I, 14 were type IIa, 3 were type IIb, and 10 were type III. Preoperative bone-conduction hearing was significantly poor in invasion type IIb or deeper cases. Cases with type IIb or deeper fistulas, multiple fistulas, or vertigo deteriorated postoperatively. Type III cases or those with multiple fistulas deteriorated further from the early postoperative period to 1 year postoperatively. Concerning frequency, 500 and 2000 Hz showed a delayed deterioration. This is a valuable report of delayed hearing loss after surgery in patients with a labyrinthine fistula. This change is associated with the labyrinthine fistula's depth and multiple fistulas-this is important during preoperative counseling of patients undergoing surgery.

Post-operative vestibular and equilibrium evaluation in patients with cholesteatoma-induced labyrinthine fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pre- and post-operative vestibular and equilibrium functions of patients with cholesteatoma-induced labyrinthine fistulas who underwent different management methods. METHODS: Data from 49 patients with cholesteatoma-induced labyrinthine fistulas who underwent one of three surgical procedures were retrospectively analysed. The three management options were fistula repair, obliteration and canal occlusion. RESULTS: Patients underwent fistula repair (n = 8), canal occlusion (n = 18) or obliteration procedures (n = 23). Patients in the fistula repair and canal occlusion groups suffered from post-operative vertigo and imbalance, which persisted for longer than in those in the obliteration group. Despite receiving different management strategies, all patients achieved complete recovery of equilibrium functions through persistent efforts in rehabilitation exercises. CONCLUSION: Complete removal of the cholesteatoma matrix overlying the fistula is reliable for preventing iatrogenic hearing deterioration due to unremitting labyrinthitis. Thus, among the three fistula treatments, obliteration is the optimal method for preserving post-operative vestibular functions.

What is the most important factor to preserve hearing in lateral semicircular canal fistula surgeries, fistula size or bony structure?

PURPOSE: Cholesteatoma on lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) fistula > 2 mm in size is likely to be unmanipulated due to the risk of sensorineural hearing loss. However, the matrix can be successfully removed without hearing loss when it is > 2 mm. The purpose of the study was to evaluate surgical experience over the past 10 years and to suggest the important factor for the hearing preservation in LSCC fistula surgeries. METHODS: According to the fistula size and symptoms, 63 patients with LSCC fistula were grouped as follows: Type I (fistula < 2 mm), Type II (≥ 2 mm and < 4 mm without vertigo), Type III (≥ 2 mm and < 4 mm with vertigo), Type IV (≥ 4 mm), and Type V (any size fistula but with deafness at the initial visit). The cholesteatoma matrix was meticulously manipulated and removed by experienced surgeons. RESULTS: Only two patients completely lost their hearing after surgery (4.5%). However, the loss was inevitable because their cholesteatomas were highly invasive and there was also facial nerve canal involvement; thus, the bony structure of the LSCC was already destroyed by the cholesteatoma. Unlike these two Type IV patients, Type I-III patients, and those with a fistula size < 4 mm, did not lose their sensorineural hearing. If the structure of the LSCC was maintained, hearing loss did not occur even if the fistula size ≥ 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The preservation of the labyrinthine structure is more important than the defect size of the LSCC fistula. If the structure is intact, cholesteatoma matrices lying on the defect can be safely removed, even though the size of bony defect is large.

Facial canal dehiscence, dural exposure, and labyrinthine fistula in middle ear cholesteatoma and mastoiditis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence and associations of facial canal dehiscence (FCD), dural exposure, and labyrinthine fistula in chronic otitis media (COM) with and without cholesteatoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed in an academic medical center. Patients who received tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for COM with and without cholesteatoma were included. The prevalence of FCD, dural exposure, and labyrinthine fistula in COM with and without cholesteatoma (mastoiditis) and their relationships were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients, including 107 (56.6%) females and 82 (43.4%) males, with 191 ears were included. There were 149 cases (78.0%) of cholesteatoma and 42 patients (22.0%) with mastoiditis. FCD was noted in 27.5% of patients with cholesteatoma and 9.5% of patients with mastoiditis. Dural exposure was found in 21 patients (14.1%) with cholesteatoma and 4 patients (9.5%) with mastoiditis. Eleven patients (7.4%) with cholesteatoma and 1 patient (2.4%) with mastoiditis had labyrinthine fistula. Patients with a labyrinthine fistula had nearly a fivefold greater chance (OR = 4.924, 95% CI = 1.355-17.896, p = 0.015) of having FCD than those without a fistula. There was a positive correlation between dural exposure and labyrinthine fistula (P = 0.011, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: FCD, dural exposure, and labyrinthine fistula are common complications in COM. These complications are more frequently observed in patients with cholesteatoma than in patients with mastoiditis. Surgeons should pay more attention to the treatment of COM.

Post-operative hearing among patients with labyrinthine fistula as a complication of cholesteatoma using "under water technique".

INTRODUCTION: During surgery in patients with labyrinthine fistula the mandatory complete removal of the cholesteatoma while preserving inner ear and vestibular function is a challenge. Options so far have been either the complete removal of the cholesteatoma or leaving the matrix on the fistula. We evaluated an alternative "under water" surgical technique for complete cholesteatoma resection, in terms of preservation of postoperative inner ear and vestibular function. METHODS: From 2013 to 2019, 20 patients with labyrinthine fistula due to cholesteatoma were operated. We used the canal wall down approach and removal of matrix on the fistula was done as the last step during surgery using the "under water technique". The pre and postoperative hearing tests and the vestibular function were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between pre and post-operative bone conduction thresholds; 20% experienced an improvement of more than 10 dB, with none experiencing a postoperative worsening of sensorineural hearing loss. Among seven patients who presented with vertigo, two had transient vertigo postoperatively but eventually recovered. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the "under water technique" for cholesteatoma removal at the labyrinthine fistula is a viable option in the preservation of inner ear function and facilitating complete cholesteatoma removal.

Pneumolabyrinth as an Early Computed Tomographic Finding After Cochlear Implantation and its Clinical Significance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and volume of pneumolabyrinth using early temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT) findings and evaluate the correlation between pneumolabyrinth and various clinical variables. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Fifty-three consecutive adult cochlear implantation (CI) recipients (53 ears) with normal inner ears who underwent high-resolution TBCT within 3 days after CI were included. INTERVENTION: Axial TBCT images were used for detection and measurement of pneumolabyrinth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and volume of pneumolabyrinth were evaluated. In addition, the following clinical variables were analyzed to evaluate the correlation with pneumolabyrinth volume: demographics, implant type, surgical approach, postoperative dizziness, and preservation of functional residual hearing. RESULTS: Pneumolabyrinth was present in all patients, and the average volume was 8.496 mm3. Pneumolabyrinth was confined to the cochlea (pneumocochlea) in all patients except for one who also had pneumovestibule. The pneumolabyrinth volume in patients with postoperative dizziness was significantly larger than that in patients without postoperative dizziness (10.435 mm3 vs. 8.016 mm3; p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis showed that a larger volume of pneumolabyrinth was significantly associated with postoperative dizziness (odds ratio, 1.420; 95% confidence interval, 1.114-1.808; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: A certain volume of pneumolabyrinth was always present in the early stage after CI, and the volume of pneumolabyrinth measured using early TBCT findings was significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative dizziness.

Cholesteatoma Causing a Horizontal Semicircular Canal Fistula.

Horizontal canal fistulas are not uncommon in patients with cholesteatoma. Patients with canal wall down cavities and exposed horizontal canal fistulas develop significant dizziness with wind or suction exposure. Obliteration of mastoid cavities in patients with exposed fistulas can be challenging. We describe a patient with horizontal canal fistula and chronic dizziness from wind exposure who underwent successful mastoid cavity obliteration with preservation of hearing. Patients with horizontal canal fistulas in a canal wall down cavity can be managed with mastoid obliteration for relief of dizziness.