RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Educational debt is commonly observed among applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs; however, an understanding of the debt burden among minority and nonminority applicants is not well established. Thus, this study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by examining the extent of and factors shaping educational debt among orthopaedic surgery applicants. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the educational debt burden among orthopaedic surgery residency applicants? (2) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, what factors are independently associated with increasing levels of educational debt? (3) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, are individuals classified as an underrepresented minority or those with educational debt and socioeconomic disadvantage less likely to match in orthopaedic surgery? METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of orthopaedic surgery residency application data from the American Association of Medical Colleges was analyzed from 2011 to 2021. The American Association of Medical Colleges database was selected because every residency applicant must register and apply through the American Association of Medical Colleges. Therefore, these data exist for every residency applicant, and the sample was comprehensive. Self-reported data including premedical, medical, and total educational debt burden as well as classification as socioeconomically disadvantaged and application fee waiver use were collected. Applicants were dichotomously categorized as an underrepresented minority or a not underrepresented minority based upon self-identified race and ethnicity. Monetary values were reported in USD and inflation-adjusted to 2021 using the Consumer Price Index. We performed t-tests and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Significance was considered at p < 0.05. In all, 12,112 applicants were available in the initial cohort, and 67% (8170 of 12,112) of applicants with complete data were included from 2011 to 2021 in the final study cohort. Of these, 18% (1510 of 8170) were women, 14% (1114 of 8170) were classified as underrepresented minorities, and 8% (643 of 8170) were classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged. Sixty-one percent (4969 of 8170) of applicants reported receiving at least one scholarship, 34% (2746 of 8170) had premedical school debt, and 72% (5909 of 8170) had any educational debt including medical school. Among all applicants, the median (IQR) educational debt was USD 197,000 (25,000 to 288,000). Among those with scholarships, the median amount was USD 25,000 (9000 to 86,000). RESULTS: After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of gender and socioeconomic disadvantage, classification as an underrepresented minority applicant was independently associated with higher scholarship amounts than applicants characterized as not underrepresented minorities (ß = USD 20,908 [95% confidence interval (CI) 15,395 to 26,422]; p < 0.001), whereas underrepresented minority classification was not independently associated with a difference in total educational debt (ß = USD 3719 [95% CI -6458 to 13,895]; p = 0.47). After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of gender and classification as an underrepresented minority, socioeconomic disadvantage was independently associated with higher scholarship amounts (ß = USD 20,341 [95% CI 13,300 to 27,382]; p < 0.001) and higher total educational debt (ß = USD 66,162 [95% CI 53,318 to 79,006]; p < 0.001) than applicants not classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged. After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of gender and classification as an underrepresented minority, socioeconomic disadvantage was independently associated with decreased match rates (OR 0.62 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.74]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the need for comprehensive scholarship initiatives to ensure equitable financial accessibility for applicants from all backgrounds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the future, orthopaedic surgery may benefit from research comparing the effectiveness of various initiatives aiming to improve fairness in the burden of debt among applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Humanos , Internato e Residência/economia , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Ortopedia/educação , Ortopedia/economia , Adulto , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/economia , Seleção de Pessoal/economia , Seleção de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
No abstract available.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Suíça , Pesquisa Biomédica/economiaRESUMO
Importance: Given that resident physician financial strain has been associated with poor outcomes, objective metrics to forecast financial well-being may be useful to (1) applicants when evaluating ophthalmology residency programs and (2) programs when determining resident benefits. Objectives: To determine and compare the relative value of ophthalmology resident stipends plus benefits when adjusted for cost-of-living expenses and to analyze program characteristics associated with greater resident net incomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to identify US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited ophthalmology residency programs. Resident physician stipends and stipends plus benefits as well as residency program characteristics from the 2023-2024 academic year were noted for all eligible programs. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Living Wage Calculator's required annual income (RAI) was selected as a surrogate to approximate cost-of-living expenses. Exposure: Residency program characteristics, including affiliation, size, ranking, presence of housing benefit, and training year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the annual stipend plus benefits income surplus (SPBIS) for each residency program, defined as the resident's stipend plus benefits (SPB) minus the RAI for the county in which the residency program is located. Secondary outcomes included income surplus variation by program characteristics. Results: Of 116 ophthalmology residency programs analyzed, 37 (31.9%) were located in the Northeast, 36 (31.0%) in the South, 29 (25.0%) in the Midwest, and 14 (12.1%) in the West. The mean (SD) postgraduate year 1 resident annual SPB was $65â¯397 ($8205), and the median (IQR) was $63â¯986 ($59â¯992-$69â¯698). After adjusting for the cost of living, the mean (SD) SPBIS was $27â¯459 ($5734) and the median (IQR) was $27â¯380 ($23â¯625-$31â¯796). Annual cost-of-living expenses varied by as much as $8628 (95% CI, $6310-$10â¯947) and SPBIS varied by as much as $6283 (95% CI, $3367-$9198) between regions. Resident SPB increased by a mean (SD) of 3.97% (0.98%) for each subsequent training year (range, 0.93%-7.26%). Annual SPBIS increased by a mean (SD) of 9.48% (3.60%) for each subsequent training year. Conclusions and Relevance: After adjusting for living costs, intraregional and interregional differences in SPBIS among ophthalmology residents can vary by thousands of dollars, impacting residents' financial security. Further discussion regarding compensation may lead to innovative strategies that aim to improve resident well-being and performance.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Internato e Residência , Oftalmologia , Internato e Residência/economia , Humanos , Oftalmologia/educação , Oftalmologia/economia , Estudos Transversais , Estados Unidos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Salários e Benefícios , RendaRESUMO
Introduction Few mandatory community-based attachments for postgraduate year two doctors (PGY2s) in Aotearoa New Zealand are hosted in general practices, due to space, time and remuneration barriers. Aim This study aimed to explore the costs, barriers and enablers to general practices of hosting PGY2s. Methods A cost analysis for four general practices beginning to host PGY2s was undertaken, including time spent supervising and supporting PGY2s, revenue impact including subsidies and cost of providing clinical space. Interviews with these practices and seven experienced PGY2 host practices were conducted and analysed thematically. Results The estimated mean cost of hosting PGY2s excluding room cost was NZ$4907 per 13-week placement (range $890-$9183), increasing to $13 727 per placement (range $5750-$24 715) when room rental was included. Four themes were identified: working within a small business model; a new learning environment for PGY2s; providing positive experiences for the PGY2s; the relationship between practices and district hospitals that employed the PGY2s, including job sizing. Discussion Tension exists between the small business model of general practice and providing positive experiences for PGY2s in a new learning environment. Guidance and support structures for PGY2 hosting should be developed nationally, and communication and cooperation between practices and employing hospitals needs improvement. Out-of-hours work should be included in community-based attachments so PGY2s' remuneration is consistent. General practice teams are willing to be part of creating a sustainable workforce. However, the time taken to host and costs of providing training in primary care are barriers. There is urgent need to increase funding to general practices for hosting PGY2s.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Nova Zelândia , Humanos , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Custos e Análise de Custo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/economia , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Entrevistas como AssuntoAssuntos
Internato e Residência , Humanos , Internato e Residência/economia , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia/educação , Ortopedia/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/economia , Feminino , Masculino , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/educação , Estados Unidos , Escolha da ProfissãoRESUMO
The anaesthetic training programme in the United Kingdom (UK) spans over seven years and is overseen by the Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCOA). Junior doctors in England are currently striking amid ongoing pay negotiations with the government, and almost all junior doctors are worried about the cost of living. This article provides an overview of the average financial cost of training for doctors in the anaesthetic training programme. The cost incurred by anaesthetic trainees illustrates the level of financial burden faced by trainees across multiple specialities. The cost includes: student loan repayment (with interest rates), compulsory membership fees (including the Royal College of Anaesthetists and General Medical Council), postgraduate examinations (Fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetist exams are compulsory to complete training) and medical indemnity. The average trainee spends between 5.6% and 7.4% of their annual salary on non-reimbursable costs. This article delineates for aforementioned expenses and compares them with the training programs in Australia and New Zealand, given their status as frequent emigration destinations for UK doctors.
Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Humanos , Anestesiologia/educação , Anestesiologia/economia , Reino Unido , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Austrália , Nova Zelândia , Salários e BenefíciosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination is a mandatory requirement for higher specialty surgical training in the UK. However, there is a significant economic impact on trainees which raises the question of whether the costs of this exam hinder surgical career progression. This study explores the burden of these exams on trainees. METHODS: A 37-point questionnaire was distributed to all trainees who were preparing for or have sat MRCS examinations. Univariate analyses included the cost of the preparatory resources, extra hours worked to pay for these and the examinations, and the number of annual leave (AL) days taken to prepare. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to identify possible correlation between monetary expenditure and success rate. RESULTS: On average, trainees (n â= â145) spent £332.54, worked 31.2 âh in addition to their rostered hours, and used 5.8 AL days to prepare for MRCS Part A. For MRCS Part B/ENT, trainees spent on average £682.92, worked 41.7 extra hours, and used 5 AL days. Overall, the average trainee spent 5-9% of their salary and one-fifth of their AL allowance to prepare for the exams. There was a positive correlation between number of attempts and monetary expenditure on Part A preparation (r(109)=0.536, p â< â0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a considerable financial and social toll of the MRCS examination on trainees. Reducing this is crucial to tackle workforce challenges that include trainee retention and burnout. Further studies exploring study habits can help reform study budget policies to ease this pressure on trainees.
Assuntos
Avaliação Educacional , Humanos , Reino Unido , Inquéritos e Questionários , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgiões/economia , Sociedades Médicas , Adulto , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/economia , Salários e BenefíciosRESUMO
This study compares postgraduate trainee racial, ethnic, and gender representation and faculty compensation for 21 clinical specialties using 2015-2022 data.
Assuntos
Docentes de Medicina , Internato e Residência , Medicina , Salários e Benefícios , Humanos , Docentes , Docentes de Medicina/economia , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/educação , Grupos Raciais/educação , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Fatores Sexuais , Salários e Benefícios/economia , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/economia , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pediatria , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos , Recursos Humanos , Humanos , Recursos Humanos/economia , Pediatria/economia , Pediatria/educação , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economiaRESUMO
This study compares graduate medical education (GME) payments between nonprofit and for-profit hospitals between 2011 and 2020 to assess how hospitals value GME.
Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Financiamento Governamental , Administração Hospitalar , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Hospitais , Internato e Residência/economia , Estados Unidos , Economia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/economia , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/organização & administração , Administração Hospitalar/economia , Hospitais com Fins Lucrativos/economia , Hospitais com Fins Lucrativos/organização & administração , Financiamento Governamental/economia , Financiamento Governamental/organização & administração , Governo FederalRESUMO
The mission of the University of Chile Clinical Hospital is to be the main University Hospital in the country. Along with training of health professionals in clinical practice and research, the Hospital provides comprehensive health solutions to the community. Since its foundation, it played an important role in the training of health professionals and specialists. To fulfill this mission, it is important to have outstanding academics and a system that allows their renewal and replacement. From January 25, 2001, the University of Chile approved the regulations that rule the Residents Program Fellowship, aimed to train the new generations of clinical academics. These regulations allow the financing of training programs in basic or primary specialties (such as internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, among others) or in specialties derived from them (such as cardiology, gastroenterology and reproductive medicine, among others.) The different clinical departments and the Hospital Direction define each year how many places will be offered and in which specialties. The Faculty of Medicine Graduate School carries out the formal selection of the applicants. This article reviews the results of this program between 2013 and 2021, analyzing in detail the traceability of each graduate over the years.
Assuntos
Humanos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Bolsas de Estudo , Hospitais Universitários , Internato e Residência/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , ChileRESUMO
The mission of the University of Chile Clinical Hospital is to be the main University Hospital in the country. Along with training of health professionals in clinical practice and research, the Hospital provides comprehensive health solutions to the community. Since its foundation, it played an important role in the training of health professionals and specialists. To fulfill this mission, it is important to have outstanding academics and a system that allows their renewal and replacement. From January 25, 2001, the University of Chile approved the regulations that rule the Residents Program Fellowship, aimed to train the new generations of clinical academics. These regulations allow the financing of training programs in basic or primary specialties (such as internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, among others) or in specialties derived from them (such as cardiology, gastroenterology and reproductive medicine, among others.) The different clinical departments and the Hospital Direction define each year how many places will be offered and in which specialties. The Faculty of Medicine Graduate School carries out the formal selection of the applicants. This article reviews the results of this program between 2013 and 2021, analyzing in detail the traceability of each graduate over the years.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Hospitais Universitários , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Chile , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Internato e Residência/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
ABSTRACT Introduction: It is estimated that 23% of the Brazilian population does not have access to an ophthalmologist, mainly because of the irregular geographical distribution of experts. It may be expensive to train ophthalmologists in Brazil. Objective: To estimate the cost of training an ophthalmologist and the labor market conditions so that the provider recovers the investment. Methods: Epidemiological study in databases from governmental sources and institutions related to the eye health system regulation. Results: The cost for training an ophthalmologist would be equal to R$ 592.272,00. After specialization, if the provider pledged all his/her income to recover the amount spent on training, it would take 5.2 years to reach the point of equilibrium. Conclusion: Young doctors from families unable to afford the cost of their education and support for at least 14 years after the beginning of the undergraduate course will hardly be able to specialize in Ophthalmology if they are unable to carry out their studies in public educational institutions. And those who can specialize are likely to choose to practice their profession in large urban centers, where most of the job opportunities are available, to at least recover the financial investment in training in the medium term.
RESUMO Introdução: Estima-se que 23% da população brasileira não tenha acesso ao oftalmologista, devido, principalmente, à falta de recursos do Sistema Público de Saúde e à distribuição geográfica irregular dos especialistas. É possível que seja caro formar oftalmologistas no Brasil. Assim, é compreensível que a maioria dos profissionais optem para ficar próximos dos grandes centros consumidores, onde estão as melhores remunerações. Objetivo: Estimar o custo para a formação de um oftalmologista e as condições do mercado de trabalho para que ele recupere o investimento. Métodos: estudo epidemiológico em bases de dados de fontes governamentais e de instituições relacionadas à regulamentação do sistema de saúde ocular. Resultados: Estimou-se que o custo para formação de um oftalmologista seja de R$ 592.272,00. Após a especialização, caso ele empenhe todo seu rendimento para reaver o valor gasto em sua formação, precisaria de 5,2 anos para atingir o ponto de equilíbrio. Conclusão: Jovens médicos oriundos de famílias incapazes de arcar com o custo de sua formação e de seu sustento, por pelo menos 14 anos após o início da graduação, dificilmente conseguirão se especializar em Oftalmologia, se não conseguirem realizar seus estudos em instituições públicas de ensino. E aqueles que conseguem se especializar, provavelmente optem por exercer a profissão em grandes centros urbanos, onde está a maior parte das oportunidades de trabalho, a fim de, a médio prazo, conseguir, pelo menos, recuperar o investimento financeiro na formação.
Assuntos
Oftalmologia/educação , Educação Médica/economia , Oftalmologistas/educação , Estudantes de Medicina , Brasil , Custos e Análise de Custo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Capacitação em Serviço/economia , Internato e Residência/economiaAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pacientes/ética , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/ética , Austrália , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Humanos , Medicina/tendências , Nova Zelândia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economiaAssuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Administração Financeira/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/economia , Cirurgia Torácica/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/educação , Humanos , Cirurgia Torácica/educaçãoAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Medicaid/organização & administração , Governo Estadual , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Financiamento Governamental/normas , Humanos , Internato e Residência/economia , Internato e Residência/normas , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/normas , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/economia , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/normas , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Alergistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos/tendências , Alergia e Imunologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , HumanosRESUMO
The COVID-19 crisis has seriously affected academic medical centers (AMCs) on multiple levels. Combined with many trends that were already under way pre pandemic, the current situation has generated significant disruption and underscored the need for change within and across AMCs. In this article, the authors explore some of the major issues and propose actionable solutions in 3 areas of concentration. First, the impact on medical students is considered, particularly the trade-offs associated with online learning and the need to place greater pedagogical emphasis on virtual care delivery and other skills that will be increasingly in demand. Solutions described include greater utilization of technology, building more public health knowledge into the curriculum, and partnering with a wide range of academic disciplines. Second, leadership recruiting, vital to long-term success for AMCs, has been complicated by the crisis. Pressures discussed include adapting to the dynamics of competitive physician labor markets as well as attracting candidates with the skill sets to meet the requirements of a shifting AMC leadership landscape. Solutions proposed in this domain include making search processes more focused and streamlined, prioritizing creativity and flexibility as core management capabilities to be sought, and enhancing efforts with assistance from outside advisors. Finally, attention is devoted to the severe financial impact wrought by the pandemic, creating challenges whose resolution is central to planning future AMC directions. Specific challenges include recovery of lost clinical revenue and cash flow, determining how to deal with research funding, and the precarious economic balancing act engendered by the need to continue distance education. A full embrace of telehealth, collaborative policy-making among the many AMC constituencies, and committing fully to being in the vanguard of the transition to value-based care form the solution set offered.