Evaluating the optimal training paradigm for transcarotid artery revascularization based on worldwide experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a new hybrid approach to carotid artery revascularization. Proctored training on live cases is an effort-, time-, and resource-intensive approach to learning new procedures. We analyzed the worldwide experience with TCAR to develop objective performance metrics for the procedure and compared the effectiveness of training physicians using cadavers or synthetic models to that of traditional in-person training on live cases. METHODS: Physicians underwent one of three mandatory training programs: (1) in-person proctoring on live TCAR procedures, (2) supervised training on human cadavers, and (3) supervised training on synthetic models. The training details and information from all subsequent independently performed TCAR procedures were recorded. The composite clinical adverse events (ie, transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, death) and composite technical adverse events (ie, aborted procedure, conversion to surgery, bleeding, dissection, cranial nerve injury, or device failure, occurring within 24 hours were recorded). Four procedural proficiency measures were recorded: procedure time, flow-reversal time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. We compared the adverse event rates between the procedures performed by physicians after undergoing the three training modes and tested whether the proficiency measures achieved during TCAR after training on cadavers and synthetic models were noninferior to proctored training. RESULTS: From March 3, 2009 to May 7, 2020, 1160 physicians had undergone proctored (19.1%), cadaver-based (27.4%), and synthetic model-based (53.5%) TCAR training and had subsequently performed 17,283 TCAR procedures. The proctored physicians had treated younger patients and more patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and had had more prior experience with transfemoral carotid stenting. The overall 24-hour composite clinical and technical adverse event rates, adjusted for age, sex, and symptomatic status, were 1.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.8%-1.3%) and 6.0% (95% confidence interval, 5.4%-6.6%), respectively, and did not differ significantly by training mode. The proficiency measures of cadaver-trained and synthetic model-trained physicians were not inferior to those for the proctored physicians. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented key objective proficiency metrics for performing TCAR and an analytic framework to assess adequate training for the procedure. Training on cadavers or synthetic models achieved clinical outcomes, technical outcomes, and proficiency measures for subsequently performed TCAR procedures similar to those achieved with training using traditional proctoring on live cases.

Longitudinal Survey of Trainee Case Log Entry for Carotid Endarterectomy: Trends in Neurologic, General, and Vascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical specialties perform carotid endarterectomy (CEA). As indications for CEA narrows, neurosurgery residents are less exposed to this procedure. This study aims to determine trends in CEA training among graduating trainees in neurosurgery and compare these to general and vascular surgery. METHODS: ACGME case log reports were retrospectively reviewed from 2013 to 2019 for neurologic, general, and vascular surgery residencies and vascular surgery fellowship. These annual reports contain the mean number of logged cases for graduating trainees and their level of participation. We analyzed trends in logged cases over the study period and compared mean number of logged cases between specialties and their respective required minimum numbers. RESULTS: Neurosurgery residents (13.5 ± 0.76) performed significantly more CEAs than their counterparts in general surgery (9.4 ± 0.34, P < 0.01) but less in integrated vascular surgery (57.7 ± 0.88) and vascular surgery fellowship (47.9 ± 0.79, both P < 0.001). The only statistically significant change over the study period was a decline in mean number of cases logged by general surgery residents at -0.4 cases/year (P < 0.001). Trainees in all specialties reported around twice as many cases as the respective Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education required minimum numbers. Neurosurgery residents demonstrated increasing participation as lead surgeons by 0.7 cases/year (P = 0.04) and a concurrent decline as senior surgeons by 1.4 cases/year (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgery residents exceeded their minimum requirements for CEA, with increasing trend in higher level of participation. But neurosurgery residents' exposure to this procedure was far less significant than their colleagues in vascular surgery, a gap that may widen over time and should be addressed proactively.

Clinical competence statement of the Society for Vascular Surgery on training and credentialing for transcarotid artery revascularization.

As the practice of medicine grows in complexity, the process of defining the expertise required for the competent execution of specific procedures has also become complex. The Society for Vascular Surgery therefore constituted a task force to provide informed recommendations on the knowledge, technical skills, resources, and infrastructure required to obtain and to maintain privileges for the safe and effective performance of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). The TCAR procedure is being adopted rapidly, and it is therefore important that informed guidance be available expeditiously. Formal training in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of carotid occlusive disease and all management options is essential. Appropriate diagnostic, imaging, endovascular, surgical, and monitoring infrastructure is required, as are resources to maintain quality control. Credentialing and privileging require a combination of both open surgical and endovascular skills. As such, physicians must have hospital privileges to perform carotid endarterectomy. They should attend an appropriate program for education and simulated training in TCAR. In addition, physicians must have performed ≥25 endovascular procedures as the primary operator using low-profile rapid-exchange platforms plus ≥5 TCAR procedures as the primary operator (pathway 1); or they may have acquired ≥25 endovascular procedures as the primary operator using low-profile rapid-exchange platforms and a supplement of 5 TCAR procedures under proctored guidance if they have not performed sufficient TCAR procedures (pathway 2); or a team of two physicians can collaborate, combining the endovascular and surgical requirements plus at least 5 TCAR procedures under proctored guidance (pathway 3).

Vascular surgery presence in carotid endarterectomy YouTube videos.

OBJECTIVE: YouTube videos have become a common resource for trainees to learn about surgical procedures. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is one example procedure that may be performed by multiple specialties and with a variety of techniques. Little is known about educational content and the representation of vascular surgeons in these videos. We sought to compare the educational quality of CEA YouTube videos, techniques demonstrated, and prevalence of each specialty. METHODS: YouTube was programmatically searched for the terms "carotid endarterectomy," "carotid endarterectomy surgery," "carotid endarterectomy technique," "carotid endarterectomy CEA," and "carotid artery surgery." Videos that met inclusion criteria were analyzed for surgical technique, procedural steps, surgeon specialty, video length, and date. Videos were determined to have high-quality educational content if the video included English-language captions or narration and demonstrated key steps of the procedure: division of the common facial vein; exposure of the common, external, and internal carotid arteries; vascular control and clamping; and arteriotomy, endarterectomy, and arteriotomy closure. RESULTS: Forty-six videos met inclusion criteria. Vascular surgery was associated with 12 (26.1%) CEA videos, cardiac surgery with 13 (28.3%), and neurosurgery with 14 (30.4%). Surgeon specialty was unknown for seven (17.4%) videos. Eight videos were high quality, of which vascular surgery was associated with three (37.5%). Conventional endarterectomy was the most common technique demonstrated, whereas a total of seven videos demonstrated eversion technique. Vascular and cardiac surgeons were more likely to demonstrate patch angioplasty than neurosurgeons, who exclusively performed primary closure (P < .05). Compared with cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeon CEA videos had more views (25,956 ± 9613 vs 1200 ± 368; P < .05) and were more likely to be published by user accounts with an academic affiliation (11 vs 6; P < .05). Vascular surgery videos were older than videos by cardiac surgeons (6.0 ± 1.1 years vs 3.0 ± 0.5 years; P < .05) and neurosurgeons (6.0 ± 1.1 years vs 3.1 ± 0.8 years; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite more views, the field of vascular surgery is under-represented in YouTube videos demonstrating CEA. Vascular surgery videos tend to be older and make up a minority of high-quality videos. As more learners turn to YouTube for information about surgical procedures, vascular surgeons should expand their online presence through the production and collection of high-quality videos for trainees.

The Impact of Operating Surgeon Experience, Supervised Trainee vs. Trained Surgeon, in Vascular Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The operative caseload of a surgeon has a positive influence on post-operative outcomes. For surgical trainees to progress effectively, maximising operating room exposure is essential, vascular surgery being no exception. Our aim was to ascertain the impact of supervised trainee led vs. expert surgeon led procedures on post-operative outcomes, across three commonly performed vascular operations. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 1 January 2018. Studies reporting outcomes following major lower limb amputation, fistula formation, or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) that involved a direct comparison between supervised trainee and experts were included, with odds ratios (ORs) calculated. Primary outcomes varied depending on the specific procedure: amputations-rate of amputation revision within 30 days; fistula formation-primary patency; CEA-stroke rate at 30 days. Meta-analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed for each outcome. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final review. Overall, trainees accounted for a third of all procedures analysed (n = 2 421/7 017; 34.5%). Only one study was identified that described rates of amputation revision, precluding any further analysis. Four studies on fistula formation were included, showing no significant difference in outcomes between trainees and experts in primary patency (OR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-6.75). Nine studies were identified reporting post-CEA stroke rates, also demonstrating no difference between trainees and experts (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59-1.32). CONCLUSION: In select cases, with appropriate training and suitable experience, supervised trainees can perform surgical procedures without any detriment to patient care. To ensure high standards for patients of the future, supported training programmes are essential for today's surgical trainees.

State of the Union in Open Neurovascular Training.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of minimally invasive endovascular approaches and training paradigms has reduced open neurovascular case exposure for neurosurgical residents. There are no published estimates of open neurovascular case volumes during residency or Committee on Advanced Subspecialty Training (CAST) accredited fellowships. METHODS: Case volumes from residency programs submitting data for CAST accredited fellowship applications were collected and analyzed. The study period covered the academic years of 2013-2016. Case index volumes were calculated to provide an estimate of total volume of cases each trainee participated in a given year. The case index volume was defined as the total volume of cases per year divided by the total training complement. RESULTS: Over the study period, institutional data from 46 programs were available. Of those programs, 9 programs had CAST accredited open cerebrovascular fellowships. Across all 46 programs, the median number of vascular cases was 246 (interquartile range [IQR]: 148-340), whereas the median number of open vascular cases was 105 (IQR: 67-152). The median number of open aneurysm cases among programs with CAST cerebrovascular fellowships was 80 (IQR: 54-103) and among programs without CAST cerebrovascular fellowships was 34 (IQR: 24-63). The median open aneurysm case index volume for trainees at programs with and without CAST cerebrovascular fellowships was 23 (IQR: 14-29) and 19 (IQR: 11-24). CONCLUSIONS: Strong neurovascular training can be obtained through dedication and planning. Completion of a CAST accredited cerebrovascular fellowship will often more than double aneurysm case exposure of trainees.

Long-term comparative effectiveness of carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy in a large tertiary care vascular surgery practice.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid interventional trials have strict inclusion and exclusion criteria that make translation of their results to the real-world population challenging. Furthermore, the specialty of the operating surgeon and the role of clinical decision-making are not well studied. This study compares the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vs carotid artery stenting (CAS) in a real-world setting when the procedure is performed by fellowship-trained vascular surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive patients undergoing CEA and CAS performed by vascular surgeons in a large rural tertiary health care system from 2004 to 2014. Postoperative outcomes of stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and death were analyzed at 30 days and during the long term (median follow-up of 5.5 years for CEA and 4.8 years for CAS). Standard statistical analysis was performed. Differences in long-term outcomes were expressed as cumulative incidence functions for nondeath outcomes (stroke and AMI), which account for the high death rate in this population of vascular patients, and as Kaplan-Meier curves for death itself. RESULTS: From January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, there were 2331 carotid interventions performed (CEA, 1853; CAS, 478), all by fellowship-trained vascular surgeons. The average age of the patients was 71 years, and 63% were male, with more men in the CAS group (61.5% vs 67.8%; P = .011). Preoperatively, 30% of patients were symptomatic, and 77% of patients had high-grade stenosis in the 70% to 99% range. CEA patients were more likely to have preoperative hypertension (89.7% vs 86.2%; P = .029) and were less likely to have a history of cardiovascular disease (53.4% vs 59.4%; P = .018). There were no significant differences in 30-day outcomes between CEA and CAS (stroke, 1.1% vs 1.3% [P = .743]; AMI, 2.2% vs 1.7% [P = .474]; death, 0.7% vs 0.6% [P = .859]) or long-term outcomes (stroke, 6.8% vs 7.7% [P = .321]; AMI, 22.7% vs 21.0% [P = .886]; death, 28.4% vs 28.2% [P = .122]). CONCLUSIONS: The short- and long-term outcomes after CEA vs CAS are similar when the procedure is performed in a real-world setting by fellowship-trained vascular surgeons.

Modified Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy: A 14-Year Experience in a Tertiary Teaching University Hospital in Brazil (South America).

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is one of the most performed vascular procedures. Since the first reports in the late 1950s, the conventional open and the eversion techniques are the popularized ones. A short extraction or partial eversion technique has been previously described and recently has been subjected to case series reports. The aim of the study was to present the experience of a teaching hospital with modified or partial eversion endarterectomy compared with the experience with conventional open procedure performed exclusively by training vascular surgeons. METHOD: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of cases from January 2002 to June 2016 was performed. RESULTS: There were 355 operations. The mean age was 70 years (range, 41-90), 72.39% were males, and 53.5% were symptomatic. There were 7.3% of contralateral occlusions and 12.1% of contralateral stenosis greater than 70%. General anesthesia was employed in 56% of cases and regional blockage in the remaining cases. A selective shunt was used in 10 patients among those operated with regional blockage (6.9%; 3.1% of the total group of patients) and 1 patient (0.5%) operated with general anesthesia. There were 73 open procedures with primary closure, 23 patch closures, and 259 partial eversion procedures. The mean operation time for the primary closure, patch closure, and eversion techniques were 129.9 min (range, 75-220), 137.5 min (range, 120-160), and 109.7 min (range, 45-230), respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test). The mean clamping time for the same techniques was 23.5 min (range, 13-50), 42 min (range, 20-60), and 17.1 min (range, 9-41), respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test). There were 2.25% of transient ischemic events, 2.54% of cerebrovascular accidents, 1.97% of death, and a combined death/cerebrovascular accidents rate of 3.94%, with no statistical difference between the surgical techniques. The incidence of neck hematoma was 5.63% and that of cranial nerve injury was 2.54%. There were 3.66% of patients submitted to late reoperation for restenosis. When results were analyzed according to the academic period of the last year of training, there was no difference regarding time and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Modified or partial eversion endarterectomy seems to be safely performed and applicable for the teaching of new vascular surgeons.

The Value of Carotid Endarterectomy as a Learning Tool for Trainees.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) intervention needs a specific training and a sufficient learning curve to obtain optimal results in terms of outcome. A formative program was settled up in a single academic center to optimize training of standard CEA procedures. This study aims to evaluate the 11-year results of the teaching CEA program. METHODS: The trainees CEA teaching program is carried on during the 5-year vascular surgery residency period, and it is stratified as follows: learning theory and intervention assistance (minimum 50 procedures per year) in the first and second residency year; performing CEA as second operator in the third and fourth residency year (minimum 50 procedures per year); CEA execution as first operator with attending supervision in the last residency year. All CEA procedures from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively collected and the 30-day results were compared according to the expertise of the first operator: experienced vascular surgeons (EVSs) versus trainees. All CEA procedures were performed in general anesthesia, with routine shunting and patching. RESULTS: In the study period, 1,379 (361 [26.2%] symptomatic; 1,018 [73.8%] asymptomatic) CEAs were performed. Trainees performed 199 (14.4%) CEAs as first operator. Patients submitted to CEA by trainees were similar in terms of preoperative clinical characteristics except for the patients' age (trainees 72.4 years versus EVS 70.8 years, P = 0.02) and smoking history (trainees 30.7% versus EVS 24.1%, P = 0.04). The 30-day complication rates were similar in CEA performed by trainees versus EVS: stroke 0.5% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.5; death 0.0% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.6; stroke/death 0.5% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.24; hematoma 3.0% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.48; and cranial nerve injury 9.0% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.47, respectively. The intervention time was significantly longer in CEAs performed by trainees compared with EVS: 104 ± 1.9 min versus 98 ± 1.0 min, P = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: With a defined CEA teaching program, trainees can obtain results similar to those of more experienced surgeons in terms of clinical outcome at the price of an increased intervention time.

Development of a Whole-Task Simulator for Carotid Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical education relies on operative exposure with live patients. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) demands an experienced surgeon with a very low complication rate. The high-risk nature of this procedure and the decline in number of CEAs performed annually has created a gap in residency training. OBJECTIVE: To develop a high-fidelity whole-task simulation for CEA that demonstrates content, construct, and face validity. METHODS: Anatomically accurate models of the human neck were created using multilayered poly-vinyl alcohol hydrogels. Graded polymerization of the hydrogel was achieved by inducing crosslinks during freeze/thaw cycles, stiffening the simulated tissues to achieve realistic tactile properties. Venous bleeding was simulated using pressure bags and a ventricular assistive device created pulsatile flow in the carotid. Ten surgeons performed the simulation under operating room conditions, and metrics were compared among experience levels to determine construct validity. Participants completed surveys about realism and usefulness to evaluate face validity. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in operative measures between attending and resident physicians. The mean operative time for the expert group was 63.6 min vs 138.8 for the resident group (P = .002). There was a difference in mean internal carotid artery clamp time of 43.4 vs 83.2 min (P = .04). There were only 2 hypoglossal nerve injuries, both in the resident group (P = .009). CONCLUSION: The whole-task CEA simulator is a realistic, inexpensive model that offers comprehensive training and allows residents to master skills prior to operating on live patients. Overall, the model demonstrated face and construct validity among neurosurgery and vascular surgeons.

Assessment of open operative vascular surgical experience among general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: General surgeons have traditionally performed open vascular operations. However, endovascular interventions, vascular residencies, and work-hour limitations may have had an impact on open vascular surgery training among general surgery residents. We evaluated the temporal trend of open vascular operations performed by general surgery residents to assess any changes that have occurred. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's database was used to evaluate graduating general surgery residents' cases from 1999 to 2013. Mean and median case volumes were analyzed for carotid endarterectomy, open aortoiliac aneurysm repair, and lower extremity bypass. Significance of temporal trends were identified using the R(2) test. RESULTS: The average number of carotid endarterectomies performed by general surgery residents decreased from 23.1 ± 14 (11.6 ± 9 chief, 11.4 + 10 junior) cases per resident in 1999 to 10.7 ± 9 (3.4 ± 5 chief, 7.3 ± 6 junior) in 2012 (R(2) = 0.98). Similarly, elective open aortoiliac aneurysm repairs decreased from 7.4 ± 5 (4 ± 4 chief, 3.4 ± 4 junior) in 1999 to 1.3 ± 2 (0.4 ± 1 chief, 0.8 ± 1 junior) in 2012 (R(2) = 0.98). The number of lower extremity bypasses decreased from 21 ± 12 (9.5 ± 7 chief, 11.8 ± 9 junior) in 1999 to 7.6 ± 2.6 (2.4 ± 1.3 chief, 5.2 + 1.8 junior) in 2012 (R(2) = 0.94). Infrapopliteal bypasses decreased from 8.1 ± 3.8 (3.5 ± 2.2 chief, 4.5 ± 2.9 junior) in 2001 to 3 ± 2.2 (1 ± 1.6 chief, 2 ± 1.6 junior) in 2012 (R(2) = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: General surgery resident exposure to open vascular surgery has significantly decreased. Current and future graduates may not have adequate exposure to open vascular operations to be safely credentialed to perform these procedures in future practice without advanced vascular surgical training.

Simulator training on pulsatile vascular models significantly improves surgical skills and the quality of carotid patch plasty.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons perform numerous highly sophisticated and delicate procedures. Due to restrictions in training time and the advent of endovascular techniques, new concepts including alternative environments for training and assessment of surgical skills are required. Over the past decade, training on simulators and synthetic models has become more sophisticated and lifelike. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of a 3-day intense training course in open vascular surgery on both specific and global vascular surgical skills. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort analysis with various parameter measurements of both surgical skills and the technical quality of the finished product, performed before and after 3 days of simulator training of 10 participants (seven male and three female) in a vascular surgery training course. The simulator model used was a conventional carotid endarterectomy with a Dacron patch plasty on a lifelike carotid bench model under pulsatile pressure. The primary end points were assessment of any changes in the participants' surgical skills and in the technical quality of their completed carotid patches documented by procedure-based assessment forms. Scores ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent) were compared by a related-sample Wilcoxon signed test. Interobserver reliability was estimated by Cronbach's alpha (CA). RESULTS: A significant improvement in surgical skills tasks was observed (P < .001). The mean score increased significantly by 21.5% from fair (3.43 ± 0.93) to satisfactory (4.17 ± 0.69; P < .001). The mean score for the quality of the carotid patch increased significantly by 0.96 (27%) from fair (3.55 ± 0.87) to satisfactory (4.51 ± 0.76; P < .01). The median interassessor reliability for the quality of the carotid patch was acceptable (CA = 0.713) and for surgical skills was low (CA = 0.424). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that lifelike simulation featuring pulsatile flow can increase surgical skills and technical quality in a highly sophisticated multistep vascular intervention. This training provides comparatively inexpensive and lifelike training possibilities for the adoption and assessment of surgical skills required to perform delicate vascular surgical procedures.

Evaluation of simulation-based training model on vascular anastomotic skills for surgical residents.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced work hours and concerns over patient safety have encouraged surgical educators to find methods to advance resident skills more efficiently. Simulation provides the opportunity to improve technical surgical skills outside the operating room. We hypothesized that practice on surgical task simulators would improve residents' technical performance of vascular anastomotic technique. METHODS: Senior general surgery residents at an academic medical center completed pretests and posttests on 3 vascular surgery simulators: femoral-popliteal bypass, carotid endarterectomy, and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The initial training sessions began with a 15-minute instructional video on how to perform the procedures, followed by supervised sessions in anastomotic technique with attending vascular surgeons. Initial individual sessions were videotaped as a pretest, and the final attempt was videotaped as the posttest. Each test was evaluated by a single experienced attending vascular surgeon blinded to the examinees. Anastomoses were graded using a performance rating and a modified objective structured assessment of technical skill rating. Results were analyzed using mixed model P values. RESULTS: The residents showed statistically significant improvement between the pretest and the posttest in both their performance rating (1.9 vs. 2.4, P = 0.02) and the objective structured assessment of technical skill (2.6 vs. 3.1, P = 0.01), as well as in most subsets of each assessment scale. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that practice using simulated anastomotic models leads to measurable improvement in vascular anastomotic technique in senior general surgery residents.

Virtual interactive presence and augmented reality (VIPAR) for remote surgical assistance.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a highly technical field that combines continuous decision-making with the coordination of spatiovisual tasks. OBJECTIVE: We designed a virtual interactive presence and augmented reality (VIPAR) platform that allows a remote surgeon to deliver real-time virtual assistance to a local surgeon, over a standard Internet connection. METHODS: The VIPAR system consisted of a "local" and a "remote" station, each situated over a surgical field and a blue screen, respectively. Each station was equipped with a digital viewpiece, composed of 2 cameras for stereoscopic capture, and a high-definition viewer displaying a virtual field. The virtual field was created by digitally compositing selected elements within the remote field into the local field. The viewpieces were controlled by workstations mutually connected by the Internet, allowing virtual remote interaction in real time. Digital renderings derived from volumetric MRI were added to the virtual field to augment the surgeon's reality. For demonstration, a fixed-formalin cadaver head and neck were obtained, and a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and pterional craniotomy were performed under the VIPAR system. RESULTS: The VIPAR system allowed for real-time, virtual interaction between a local (resident) and remote (attending) surgeon. In both carotid and pterional dissections, major anatomic structures were visualized and identified. Virtual interaction permitted remote instruction for the local surgeon, and MRI augmentation provided spatial guidance to both surgeons. Camera resolution, color contrast, time lag, and depth perception were identified as technical issues requiring further optimization. CONCLUSION: Virtual interactive presence and augmented reality provide a novel platform for remote surgical assistance, with multiple applications in surgical training and remote expert assistance.

Vascular surgery training trends from 2001-2007: A substantial increase in total procedure volume is driven by escalating endovascular procedure volume and stable open procedure volume.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedure volume has increased rapidly, and endovascular procedures have become the initial treatment option for many vascular diseases. Consequently, training in endovascular procedures has become an essential component of vascular surgery training. We hypothesized that, due to this paradigm shift, open surgical case volume may have declined, thereby jeopardizing training and technical skill acquisition in open procedures. METHODS: Vascular surgery trainees are required to log both open and endovascular procedures with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). We analyzed the ACGME database (2001-2007), which records all cases (by Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code) performed by graduating vascular trainees. Case volume was evaluated according to the mean number of cases performed per graduating trainee. RESULTS: The mean number of total major vascular procedures performed per trainee increased by 174% between 2001 and 2007 (from 298.3 to 519.2). Endovascular diagnostic and therapeutic procedures increased by 422% (from 63.7 to 269.1) and accounted for 93.0% of the increase in total procedures. The number of open aortic procedures (aneurysm, occlusive, mesenteric, renal) decreased by 17.1% (from 49.7 to 41.2), while the number of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair procedures increased by 298.8% (from 16.9 to 50.5). Specifically, open aortic aneurysm procedures decreased by 21.8%, aortobifemoral bypass increased by 3.2%, and open mesenteric or renal procedures decreased by 13%. Infrainguinal bypass procedures remained relatively constant (from 37.6 to 36.5, 2.9% decrease), and the number of carotid endarterectomy procedures performed did not change significantly (from 43.6 to 42.2, 3.2% decrease). CONCLUSION: Vascular surgery trainees are performing a vastly increased total number of procedures. This increase in total procedure volume is almost entirely attributable to the recent increase in endovascular procedures. Aside from a small decline in open aortic procedures, the volume of open surgical procedures has largely remained stable. It is essential that vascular surgery training programs continue to focus on both endovascular and open surgical skills in order for vascular surgeons to remain the premier specialists to care for patients with vascular disease.

Gaining consent for carotid surgery: a simulation-based study of vascular surgeons.

AIM: Despite no formal training in consenting patients, surgeons are assumed to be competent if they are able to perform an operation. We tested this assumption for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: Thirty-two surgeons [Group 1: junior surgical trainees--performed 0 CEA's (n=11); 2: senior vascular trainees--1-50 CEA's (n=11); 3: consultant vascular surgeons - > 50 CEA's (n=10)] consented two patients (trained actors) for a local anaesthetic CEA. The performance was assessed at post hoc video review by two independent assessors using a validated rating scale and checklist of risk factors. RESULTS: There was no difference in performance between the junior and senior trainees (1: median 91 range 64-121; 2: median 100.5 range 66-125; p=0.118 1 vs. 2 Mann-Whitney). There was a significant improvement between senior trainees and consultant surgeons (3: median 120 range 89-1 142; p=0.001 2 vs. 3). Few junior (1/11) and senior (2/11) trainees, and most (8/11) consultants, were competent. Inter-rater reliability was high (alpha=0.832). Consultant surgeons were significantly more likely to discuss cranial nerve injuries (p<0.0001 Chi-square test) as well as personal or hospital specific stroke risk (p<0.0001) than their junior counterparts. They were less likely to discuss infection (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Senior trainees, despite being able to perform a CEA, were not competent in consent. The majority of consultant surgeons had developed competence in consenting even though they had no formal training.

Training for carotid intervention: preparing the next generation.

BACKGROUND: Carotid interventions are performed to reduce the cumulative risk of stroke. The success of the procedure is dependent upon maintaining low operative risk. This article reviews the current state of training for both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). METHODS: Medline searches were performed to identify articles with the combination of the following key words: carotid, endarterectomy, stent, training, assessment and simulation. Manual searches of the reference lists and related papers was conducted. RESULTS: Training and assessment for CEA and CAS follows the traditional apprenticeship model. There is no formal training protocol or objective means of assessment for either carotid endarterectomy or stenting. Models and simulators to allow for training and assessment away from the operative theatre have been developed, and exist for both CEA and CAS. CONCLUSION: The technology exists to allow for both training and assessment of competency to take place in a controlled and objective environment for both CEA and CAS. The use of simulation needs to be robustly evaluated and assessed to both complement and augment existing training programs to ensure that the highest standards of care are maintained for treatment of carotid territory disease. Objective competency based training and assessment is no longer unattainable. Simulators augment this process and without them operative exposure is sporadic and crisis management infrequent.

Assessment of operative competence during carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) has been used to assess operative competence. The aim was to evaluate its role in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: Over 2 years, 17 trainees and 11 consultants were assessed by a single observer using a task-specific checklist and global ratings. Operating time and previous experience were also recorded. RESULTS: Trainees had previously performed fewer CEAs than consultants (median (interquartile range, i.q.r.) 15 (7-24) versus 94 (61-133) respectively; P < 0.001) and they took longer to perform operations (median (i.q.r.) 128 (119-143) versus 90 (82.5-98.5) min; P < 0.001). Trainees achieved lower task-specific (median (i.q.r.) 23 (17-26) versus 25 (24.5-27.5); P = 0.031) and global (33 (30-35) versus 40 (36.5-43); P = 0.001) scores than consultants. There was a strong positive correlation between task-specific scores and experience for trainees (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), but not for consultants. Global ratings correlated with experience for trainees (r = 0.69, P = 0.002) and more so for consultants (r = 0.82, P = 0.002). There was a positive correlation between task-specific and global scores for trainees (r = 0.67, P = 0.003), but not for consultants. CONCLUSION: Task-specific checklists were more discriminatory between trainees and may be useful for formative assessment (training). Global ratings were more discriminatory for consultants and may be useful for summative assessment (examination or revalidation).

A suggested training programme for carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Carotid artery stenting as an alternative to traditional carotid endartrectomy is becoming increasingly important in the treatment of transient ischemic attack and stroke. Physicians from several different medical disciplines are interested in treating appropriate patients by this method. Patients are entitled to know what training and experience the surgeon or clinician has before giving consent. This should involve endovascular experience in all systems and experience and knowledge of cerebral angiography and intervention. A multidisciplinary approach and reporting of adverse events is vital for patient safety.