Risk of suprascapular nerve injury in open Trillat procedure: an anatomical study.

PURPOSE: The open Trillat Procedure described to treat recurrent shoulder instability, has a renewed interest with the advent of arthroscopy. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is theoretically at risk during the drilling of the scapula near the spinoglenoid notch. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the screw securing the coracoid transfer and the SSN during open Trillat Procedure and define a safe zone for the SSN. METHODS: In this anatomical study, an open Trillat Procedure was performed on ten shoulders specimens. The coracoid was fixed by a screw after partial osteotomy and antero-posterior drilling of the scapular neck. The SSN was dissected with identification of the screw. We measured the distances SSN-screw (distance 1) and SSN-glenoid rim (distance 2). In axial plane, we measured the angles between the glenoid plane and the screw (α angle) and between the glenoid plane and the SSN (ß angle). RESULTS: The mean distance SSN-screw was 8.8 mm +/-5.4 (0-15). Mean α angle was 11°+/-2.4 (8-15). Mean ß angle was 22°+/-6.7 (12-30). No macroscopic lesion of the SSN was recorded but in 20% (2 cases), the screw was in contact with the nerve. In both cases, the ß angle was measured at 12°. CONCLUSION: During the open Trillat Procedure, the SSN can be injured due to its anatomical location. Placement of the screw should be within 10° of the glenoid plane to minimize the risk of SSN injury and could require the use of a specific guide or arthroscopic-assisted surgery.

Optimal needle electromyography approach to the serratus anterior muscle.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: There are two conventional needle electromyography (EMG) approaches to the serratus anterior (SA), both of which can result in erroneous insertion into adjacent structures such as the latissimus dorsi (LD), teres major, or external oblique abdominis muscles and pose a risk of long thoracic nerve (LTN) injury. Therefore, we identified a novel needle insertion point for the SA in cadavers that avoids other muscles and LTN injury. METHODS: This study included 17 cadavers: 12 to devise the new method and 5 to verify its accuracy. Novel landmarks were the inferior angle of the scapula (I), sternal notch (S), and xiphoid process (X). The relationships of the LD, pectoralis major (PM), SA, and LTN were determined relative to these landmarks. RESULTS: When inserting a needle into the proximal one third along the line connecting points I and X, there were adequate safety margins around the LD, PM, and LTN, and the new method had excellent accuracy. DISCUSSION: Compared to the conventional midaxillary method, our novel method improved the accuracy of needle EMG of the SA. Follow-up studies using clinical imaging techniques are needed to verify whether above findings are equally applicable in living subjects.

Winged Scapula: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Common Causes Based on 20 Years of Experience in a Referral Center in Turkey.

PURPOSE: Winged scapula (WS) is a functionally disabling problem and it occurs because of neurogenic causes frequently. The authors aimed to assess WS patients by physical and electrodiagnostic examinations as well as some further investigations and define the common causes of WS. METHODS: The authors reviewed clinical and neurophysiological findings of 52 patients who were referred for electrodiagnostic examination because of WS in the period of 20 years. RESULTS: The mean age was 39 (range, 11-73) years and 32 were male patients. Right side was involved in 60% of patients (n = 31). According to electrodiagnostic examinations, 44 patients (85%) had neurogenic causes; 29 spinal accessory nerve palsy (17 occurred after surgical procedure), nine long thoracic nerve palsy (four occurred after strenuous activity), two dorsal scapular nerve (both neuralgic amyotrophy), one long thoracic nerve and spinal accessory nerve (relevant with strenuous trauma), one spinal accessory nerve and dorsal scapular nerve palsies (after surgical procedure and radiotherapy), one C5-7 radiculopathy (avulsion), and one brachial plexopathy (obstetric trauma). Five patients (10%) had muscle-related findings (four facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy and one Duchenne muscular dystrophia) and three patients (5%) had normal findings (bone-joint related). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a relatively large series of patients with WS because of several causes from a referral tertiary EMG laboratory. The authors found that spinal accessory nerve palsy after neck surgery is the most common cause and long thoracic nerve palsy is the second common cause of unilateral WS. Electrodiagnostic examinations should be performed in WS patients to establish exact diagnosis and reveal some coexistence of WS causes.

Scapula winging secondary to prone plank exercise: a case report.

Background: Scapular winging occurs when the muscles responsible for the stabilization of the scapula (serratus anterior, trapezius, rhomboid major and minor) are paralyzed due to any reason. The most frequently observed neurological aetiology is serratus anterior muscle dysfunction due to long thoracic nerve palsy. The cause of long thoracic nerve palsy may be traumatic or atraumatic. It has been previously reported that a wide variety of sports can cause long thoracic nerve palsy.Clinical presentation: In this article, we report a case of unilateral winging of the scapula due to injury to the long thoracic nerve which occurred secondary to performing prone plank exercises; the likes of which has not previously been described in the literature and which may have occurred due to the exercise being performed incorrectly. In this patient, nerve recovery became evident one month following conservative treatment and cessation of plank exercises.Conclusion: Long thoracic nerve injury may have occurred due to increased and incorrect scapula loading during plank exercises. In order to prevent compression neuropathies caused by load transfer imbalance, attention should be paid to correct positioning whilst performing core stabilization exercises such as the prone plank.

Is there any difference between anterior and posterior approach for the spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dual nerve transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) and the radial nerve to the axillary nerve is considered to be the most feasible method of restoration of shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries. Supraspinatus muscle plays an important role in the initiation of abduction and its functional restoration is crucial for shoulder movements. There are two possible approaches for the SAN-SSN transfer: the more conventional anterior approach and the posterior approach in the area of scapular spine, which allows more distal neurotization. Although the dual nerve transfer is a widely used method, it is unclear which approach for the SAN-SSN transfer results in better outcomes. We conducted a search of English literature from January 2001 to December 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies with a total 142 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the approach used: Group A included patients who underwent the anterior approach, and Group B included patients who underwent the posterior approach. Abduction strength using the Medical Research Scale (MRC) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. The average MRC grade was 3.57 ± 1.08 in Group A and 4.0 ± 0.65 (p = 0.65) in Group B. The average ROM was 114.6 ± 36.7 degrees in Group A and 103.4 ± 37.2 degrees in Group B (p = 0.247). In conclusion, we did not find statistically significant differences between SAN-SSN transfers performed from the anterior or posterior approach in patients undergoing dual neurotization technique for restoration of shoulder abduction.

Risk assessment of dorsal scapular nerve injury in the medial scapular area associated with upper extremity position: An ultrasonographic study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Injuries to the dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) in the interscapular region are relatively uncommon. Physicians may therefore underestimate the risk of damage to the DSN during procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the topographic position of the DSN in the interscapular region and to identify injection positions for the upper extremities that minimize the risk of damage to the DSN during procedures. METHODS: The positional relationships between the DSN and scapula were quantified by ultrasonography in 46 healthy volunteers. The distances between the medial scapular line and DSN and the DSN depths from the surface in Zones 1 (the superior angle), 2 (the scapular spine), and 3 (between the scapular spine and inferior angle) were measured in the anatomical and contralateral shoulder touch positions (positions 1 and 2, respectively). RESULTS: The DSN was located further away from the medial border of the scapula and closer to the skin in position 2 than in position 1. The horizontal distance of the DSN in Zone 2 differed significantly between the two positions (0.85 ± 0.38 vs 1.23 ± 0.38, P < .001). The results suggest a safe area as just medial to the medial scapular border in Zone 2 in position 2. The safety margin should be considered at least 1.5 cm medial to the medial border of the scapula in Zone 3 in position 1. DISCUSSION: Performing invasive procedures in the interscapular region, appropriate individualized positioning may reduce the risk of DSN injury.

Does the Suprascapular Nerve Move within the Suprascapular Notch? Biomechanical Perspective Using the Finite Element Method.

PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze changes in suprascapular nerve (SSN) position within the suprascapular notch during in vivo shoulder abduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional models of the shoulder complex were constructed based on magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus (BP-MR) in a patient diagnosed with SSN dysfunction but normal scapular movement. Using BP-MR in neutral position and computed tomography data on shoulder abduction, shoulder abduction was simulated as the transition between two positions of the shoulder complex with overlapping of a neutral and abducted scapula. SSN movement during abduction was evaluated using the finite element method. Contact stress on the SSN was measured in the presence and absence of the transverse scapular ligament (TSL). RESULTS: In the neutral position, the SSN ran almost parallel to the front of the TSL until entering the suprascapular notch and slightly contacted the anterior-inferior border of the TSL. As shoulder abduction progressed, contact stress decreased due to gradual loss of contact with the TSL. In the TSL-free scapula, there was no contact stress on the SSN in the neutral position. Towards the end of shoulder abduction, contact stress increased again as the SSN began to contact the base of the suprascapular notch in both TSL conditions. CONCLUSION: We identified changes in the position of the SSN path within the suprascapular notch during shoulder abduction. The SSN starts in contact with the TSL and moves toward the base of the suprascapular notch with secondary contact. These findings may provide rationale for TSL release in SSN entrapment.

[Neurological shoulder pain and weakness : practical attitudes]. / Douleurs et faiblesse de l'épaule neurologique : attitudes pratiques.

Shoulder pain or paresis should be assessed carefully, as there are many possible causes, which can be osteoarticular, degenerative, inflammatory, or neurological. Weakness or pain can be related to cervicobrachialgia, plexitis, or focal mononeuropathy. The clinical picture should identify any muscular or mechanical origin of paresis responsible for pseudo-paretic functional limitation. Neurogenic scapulalgia with functional deficit implies the compression or entrapment of a nerve trunk including the axillary, long thoracic, accessory, suprascapular, or dorsal scapular nerves. Nerve conduction study and myography together with medical imaging help to identify the relevant etiology. Treatment mostly includes pain relief and physiotherapy, but surgery is rarely necessary.

L'épaule douloureuse ou parétique est d'appréhension délicate et de causes variées : ostéoarticulaire, dégénérative, inflammatoire ou neurologique. La faiblesse ou la douleur peuvent être liées à une cervicobrachialgie, une plexite ou une mononeuropathie focale. Le tableau clinique doit distinguer une parésie d'origine musculaire ou mécanique responsable alors d'une limitation fonctionnelle pseudo-parétique. Une scapulalgie déficitaire neurogène implique la recherche d'une mononeuropathie d'enclavement ou compressive d'un tronc nerveux, axillaire, long thoracique, accessoire du XIe nerf crânien, suprascapulaire ou dorsal de la scapula. Au besoin l'ENMG (électroneuromyogramme)et l'imagerie débrouilleront les multiples étiologies. Le traitement requiert le plus souvent une antalgie et une rééducation, rarement une chirurgie.

Comparison of ultrasound with electrodiagnosis of scapular winging: A prospective case control study.

OBJECTIVE: Compare high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) and electrodiagnostic examination (EDX) in the diagnostic workup of patients with scapulae alatae. METHODS: 27 patients with scapulae alatae and 41 healthy subjects (HS) and underwent a standardized clinical examination (CEX), EDX and HRUS. We measured the thickness of the serratus anterior (SER), rhomboid major and trapezius muscles and the diameter of the long thoracic (LTN), dorsal scapular and spinal accessory nerves (SAN). RESULTS: Twenty patients showed medial winging and six patients showed lateral winging on CEX. One patient had both lateral and medial winging. In patients with medial winging, the SER muscle was thinner and the LTN diameter was larger on the symptomatic side compared with the asymptomatic side and with the dominant side in HS. In this group, both EDX and HRUS detected abnormalities of SER muscle/ LTN with sensitivity of 65%, and with specificity of 100% and 57%, respectively. EDX and HRUS detected abnormalities of the trapezius muscle/ SAN with sensitivity of 60% and 40%, and specificity of 91%, and 86 % a, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two methods. CONCLUSION: HRUS can contribute to the diagnostic workup of scapulae alatae by demonstrating atrophy of muscles and enlargement in nerve diameter. SIGNIFICANCE: HRUS supplements EDX in the diagnostic workup of scapulae alatae.

Accuracy of sonographic identification of suprascapular nerve at supraclavicular fossa: a cadaveric study / Precisión de la identificación ecográfica del nervio supraescapular en la fosa supraclavicular: un estudio cadavérico

SUMMARY: Sonographic identification of suprascapular nerve (SSN) is essential for diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy and ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block. This study aims to demonstrate the accuracy of identification of SSN at supraclavicular region by ultrasonography in fresh cadavers. Ninety-three posterior cervical triangles were examined. With ultrasonography, SSN emerging from the upper trunk of brachial plexus was identified and followed until it passed underneath the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. Sonographic visualization of SSN in supraclavicular fossa was recorded. Then, cadaveric dissection was performed to determine the presence or absence of SSN. An agreement between sonographic identification and direct visualization was specified and categorized the following three patterns: "correctly identified" (pattern I), "incorrectly identified" (pattern II), and "unidentified" (pattern III). The identification of SSN using sonography was correct in almost 90 %. The diameter of SSN with pattern I was the largest compared to those of other two patterns. In pattern I, SSN ran laterally from the upper trunk of brachial plexus and passed underneath the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. Therefore, SSN was easily identified under ultrasonography. In pattern II, nerve identified by ultrasonography was literally the dorsal scapular nerve. In pattern III, SSN was unable to be identified because of its anatomical variation. The accuracy of ultrasonographic identification of SSN at supraclavicular fossa is high and the key sonoanatomical landmarks are the lateral margin of brachial plexus and the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. The anatomical variants of SSN are reasons of incorrect or unable identification of SSN under ultrasonography.

RESUMEN: La identificación ecográfica del nervio supraescapular (NSE) es esencial para el diagnóstico de neuropatía supraescapular y bloqueo del nervio supraescapular mediante la ecografía. Este estudio tiene como objetivo demostrar la precisión de la identificación de NSE en la región supraclavicular por ecografía en cadáveres frescos. Se examinaron noventa y tres triángulos cervicales posteriores. Se identificó el NSE emergente de la parte superior del tronco del plexo braquial con la ecografía, y se siguió hasta su trayecto por debajo del vientre inferior del músculo omohioideo. Se registró la visualización ecográfica del NSE en la fosa supraclavicular. Luego, se realizó disección cadavérica para determinar la presencia o ausencia de NSE. Se especificó un acuerdo entre la identificación ecográfica y la visualización directa y se categorizaron los siguientes tres patrones: "identificado correctamente" (patrón I), "identificado incorrectamente" (patrón II) y "no identificado" (patrón III). La identificación de NSE mediante ecografía fue correcta en casi el 90 %. El diámetro del NSE con el patrón I fue el más grande en comparación con los de los otros dos patrones. En el patrón I, NSE corría lateralmente desde la parte superior del tronco del plexo braquial y pasaba por debajo del vientre inferior del músculo omohioideo. Por lo tanto, el NSE se identificó fácilmente mediante ecografía. En el patrón II, el nervio identificado por ecografía era literalmente el nervio escapular dorsal; en el patrón III, el NSE no pudo ser identificado debido a su variación anatómica. La precisión de la identificación ecográfica del NSE en la fosa supraclavicular es alta y los puntos de referencia sonoanatómicos clave son el borde lateral del plexo braquial y el vientre inferior del músculo omohioideo. Las variantes anatómicas de NSE son razones de identificación incorrecta o incapaz de NSE bajo ecografía.

Decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch under combined arthroscopic and ultrasound guidance.

Decompression of the suprascapular nerve (SSNe) at the suprascapular notch (SSNo) is usually performed with an arthroscopic procedure. This technique is well described but locating the nerve is complex because it is deeply buried and surrounded by soft tissue. We propose to combine ultrasound and arthroscopy (US-arthroscopy) to facilitate nerve localization, exposure and release. The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this technique. This is an experimental, cadaveric study, carried out on ten shoulders. The first step of our technique is to locate the SSNo using an ultrasound scanner. Then an arthroscope is introduced under ultrasound control to the SSNo. A second portal is then created to dissect the pedicle and perform the ligament release. Ultrasound identification of the SSNo, endoscopic dissection and decompression of the nerve were achieved in 100% of cases. Ultrasound identification of the SSNo took an average of 3 min (± 4) while dissection and endoscopic release time took an average of 8 min (± 5). Ultrasound is an extremely powerful tool for non-invasive localization of nerves through soft tissues, but it is limited by the fact that tissue visualization is limited to the ultrasound slice plane, which is two-dimensional. On the other hand, arthroscopy (extra-articular) allows three-dimensional control of the surgical steps performed, but the locating of the nerve involves significant tissue detachment and a risk of damaging the nerve with the dissection. The combination of the two (US-arthroscopy) offers the possibility of combining the advantages of both techniques.

Suprascapular nerve block is a clinically attractive alternative to interscalene nerve block during arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is a commonly used nerve block technique for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy surgery; however, it is associated with potentially serious complications. The use of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been described as an alternative strategy with fewer reported side effects for shoulder arthroscopy. This review aimed to compare the impact of SSNB and ISB during shoulder arthroscopy surgery. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials involving SSNB and ISB during shoulder arthroscopy surgery. Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CNKI, and Wanfang database were searched from 2010 through March 2021. RESULTS: We identified 1255 patients assessed in 17 randomized controlled trials. Compared with the ISB group, the SSNB group had higher VAS at rest in PACU (P = 0.003), 1 h after operation (P = 0.005), similar pain score 2 h (P = 0.39), 3-4 h (P = 0.32), 6-8 h after operation (P = 0.05), then lower VAS 12 h after operation (P = 0.00006), and again similar VAS 1 day (P = 0.62) and 2 days after operation (P = 0.70). As for the VAS with movement, the SSNB group had higher pain score in PACU (P = 0.03), similar VAS 4-6 h after operation (P = 0.25), then lower pain score 8-12 h after operation (P = 0.01) and again similar VAS 1 day after operation (P = 0.3) compared with the ISB group. No significant difference was found for oral morphine equivalents use at 24 h (P = 0.35), duration of PACU stay (P = 0.65), the rate of patient satisfaction (P = 0.14) as well as the rate of vomiting (P = 0.56), and local tenderness (P = 0.87). However, the SSNB group had lower rate of block-related complications such as Horner syndrome (P < 0.0001), numb (P = 0.002), dyspnea (P = 0.04), and hoarseness (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our high-level evidence established SSNB as an effective and safe analgesic technique and a clinically attractive alternative to interscalene block with the SSNB'S advantage of similar pain control, morphine use, and less nerve block-related complications during arthroscopic shoulder surgery, especially for severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and morbid obesity. Given our meta-analysis's relevant possible biases, we required more adequately powered and better-designed RCT studies with long-term follow-up to reach a firmer conclusion.

The synergistic effects of applying pulsed radiofrequency lesioning of the suprascapular nerve plus physical therapy on pain and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis: A protocol of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there have been no published clinical trials to assess the synergistic effects of applying pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) plus physical therapy on pain and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Therefore, we will conduct this present randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the synergistic effects of applying PRF stimulation of the SSN plus physical therapy on pain and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: The study protocol is a randomized, controlled, double-blind design. Recruitment will be started in March 2021 and completed in October 2022. The treating surgeon will assess 90 patients for eligibility. The study protocol was approved through Institutional Review Board in the People's Hospital of Beilun district of Ningbo. Each patient will be randomized into 3 treatment groups, receiving PRF stimulation of the SSN or physical therapy or both of them. After baseline examination, all patients will be given a full explanation of the treatment protocol and will be required to sign a written informed consent for study participation and for publication of the results. All the data collectors, surgeons, statistical analysts, as well as result assessors are not aware of grouping assignment. The outcomes include Constant score, visual analog scale score, range of motion, and strength. RESULTS: This protocol will provide a reliable theoretical basis for the following research. CONCLUSION: It is assumed that there will be a remarkable difference in postoperative outcomes between the intervention and control groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PZ9ES.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Suprascapular Nerve Decompression for Suprascapular Neuropathy.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes following arthroscopic suprascapular nerve (SSN) decompression for suprascapular neuropathy at the suprascapular and/or spinoglenoid notch in the absence of major concomitant pathology. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 19 patients who underwent SSN release at the suprascapular and/or spinoglenoid notch between April 2006 and August 2017 with ≥2 years of follow-up. Patients who underwent concomitant rotator cuff or labral repairs or had severe osteoarthritis were excluded. Pre- and postoperative strength and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), 12-item Short Form (SF-12), and satisfaction. Complications and revisions were recorded. RESULTS: At a mean final follow-up of 4.8 years, pre- to postoperative ASES (64.9 ± 18.7 versus 83.5 ± 23.1; P = .018), QuickDASH (28.7 ± 17.2 versus 12.7 ± 17.1; P = .028), SANE (64.3 ± 16.4 versus 80.8 ± 22.3; P = .034), and SF-12 PCS (41.1 ± 10.8 versus 52.3 ± 5.8; P = .007) scores all significantly improved. Median strength for external rotation improved significantly (4 [range 2 to 5] versus 5 [range 3 to 5]; P = .014). There was no statistically significant improvement in median strength for abduction (4 [range 3 to 5] versus 5 [5]; P = .059). Median postoperative satisfaction was 9 (range 1 to 10), with 8 patients (50%) rating satisfaction ≥9. No complications were observed, and no patients went on to revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic SSN decompression for suprascapular neuropathy at the suprascapular and/or spinoglenoid notch in the absence of major concomitant glenohumeral pathology results in good functional outcomes with significant improvements from before to after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic case series.

Applied anatomical study on suprascapular nerve protection in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) anatomical relationship between the suprascapular nerve and scapula, and the method of protecting the suprascapular nerve in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) METHODS: In the present study, 12 fresh adult cadaver shoulder specimens were dissected. X-ray and computed tomography (CT) were used to investigate the 3D scapular and suprascapular nerve images. RESULTS: The results revealed that the best fitting baseplate diameter was 24.73 ± 1.56 mm. Furthermore, the baseplate diameter correlated with the glenoid cavity width. After the osteotomy, a simulated screw placement on the baseplate was performed. The dangerous area for the posterior screw placement was at the angle between the upper edge and transverse axis exceeding 38° and between the lower edge and transverse axis exceeding 76°. The distance between the nearest point of the nerve and osteotomy plane was 15.38 ± 2.02 mm, and the angle between the projection point of the nearest point and transverse axis was 27.33 ± 7.96°, which was the dangerous area for retractor placement. The suitable angle between the superior screw and longitudinal axis was 21.67 ± 13.27°, and the suitable superior screw length was 34.66 ± 2.41 mm. CONCLUSION: In RTSA, the baseplate size correlates with the glenoid cavity width. The relationship between the screw and suprascapular nerve and retractor placement position should be carefully considered to avoid damaging the suprascapular nerve.

Voluntary winging of the scapula: Proposed diagnostic criteria.

We report a series of 10 patients with unilateral, dynamic, winged scapula (WS), without cause, that was diagnosed as voluntary winging of the scapula (VWS). We compared clinical, electrodiagnostic, and other examination data for 10 patients with VWS and 146 with dynamic WS-related neuromuscular disorders, to establish a detailed pattern of the VWS subtype. In VWS, electrodiagnostic and other examinations did not reveal any neuromuscular or orthopedic cause. Winging was dynamic, obvious, neither medial nor lateral, and mainly involved the inferior angle of the scapula, in young patients. VWS never appeared during floor push-ups. Patients could produce WS at will with the index and healthy shoulder, between 25° and 65° of anterior elevation, or with shoulder internal rotation. VWS is a benign disorder that can be distinguished from neuromuscular WS by normal electrodiagnostic results for muscles and nerves of both shoulders and two specific clinical tests.

Foraminal Origin of the Dorsal Scapular Nerve: An Anatomical Study.

BACKGROUND: Although distal dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) anatomy has been well characterized, a paucity of literature exists detailing its proximal origin. To our knowledge, this is the first study examining DSN origin and its anatomy relative to the C5 nerve root, which may help localize pathology and provide insight into timing of DSN or C5 nerve root clinical and electrophysiological recovery. METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric dissections were performed using a posterior-midline approach. Calipers were used for DSN branching and course characterization with statistical analysis completed for the following measurements: DSN diameter, C5 nerve root diameter, distance of DSN branch-point from the C5 ganglion, dural edge, and posterior foraminal tubercle (intra-vs. extraforaminal origin), as well as C5 root-SC branch-point distance. RESULTS: Average/mean measurements (standard error) were as follows: DSN diameter: 3.7 mm (0.3 mm), C5 nerve root diameter: 6.2 mm (0.5 mm), DSN origin to C5 DRG: 12.4 mm (1.9 mm) distal, DSN origin to dural edge: 19. 6mm (1.8 mm), DSN origin to C5 root origin: 23.3 mm (2.2 mm), DSN origin to the posterior foraminal tubercle: 2.3 mm (2.5 mm) proximal/intraforaminal (first branch from C5 in all cases, and the majority [12 of 18, 67%] of DSNs originating from the C5 spinal nerve root within the foramen). CONCLUSIONS: The C5 nerve root contributed to the DSN in all specimens that originated from the proximal, intraforaminal, C5 nerve root in the majority of specimens. As the first C5 nerve branch, surgeon knowledge of this proximal DSN pattern will help localize lesional pathology, as well as may help monitor clinical and electrophysiological recovery.

The Evaluation and Management of Suprascapular Neuropathy.

Suprascapular neuropathy is a potential source of shoulder pain and functional limitation that can present secondary to various etiologies including entrapment or compression. Cystic lesions arising from a labral or capsular tear can compress the nerve along its course over the scapula. Nerve traction is theorized to arise from chronic overhead athletics or due to a retracted rotator cuff tear. The diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy is based on a combination of a detailed history, a comprehensive physical examination, imaging, and electrodiagnostic studies. Although the anatomic course and variations in bony constraint are well understood, the role of surgical treatment in cases of suprascapular neuropathy is less clear. Recent reviews on the topic have shed light on the outcomes after the treatment of suprascapular neuropathy because of compression, showing that surgical release can improve return to play in well-indicated patients. The incidence of compressive neuropathy is quite high in the overhead athletic cohort, but most patients do not show clinically relevant deficiencies in function. Surgical release is therefore not routinely recommended unless patients with pain or deficits in strength fail appropriate nonsurgical treatment.

Suprascapular nerve decompression in addition to rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized observational trial.

BACKGROUND: Tear and retraction of the supraspinatus (SS) and infraspinatus (IS) musculotendinous units and/or their repair may be associated with traction damage to the suprascapular nerve, potentially responsible for pain or weakness of the rotator cuff (RC). Arthroscopic release of the transverse scapular ligament at the suprascapular notch has been advocated to prevent or treat suprascapular nerve impairment associated with RC retraction and/or repair. The effect of this procedure on preoperative normal nerve function is, however, not well studied.We hypothesize that (1) decompression of the suprascapular nerve without preoperative pathologic neurophysiological findings will not improve clinical or imaging outcome and (2) suprascapular decompression will not measurably change suprascapular nerve function. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients with a magnetic resonance arthrography documented RC tear involving SS and IS but normal preoperative electromyography (EMG)/nerve conduction studies of the SS and IS were enrolled in a prospective, controlled trial involving RC repair with or without suprascapular nerve decompression at the suprascapular notch. Nine patients were randomized to undergo, and 10 not to undergo, a decompression of the suprascapular nerve. Patients were assessed clinically (Constant score, mobility, pain, strength, subjective shoulder value), with magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiology preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: There was no clinically relevant difference between the release and the non-release group in any clinical parameter at any time point. At magnetic resonance imaging, there was a slightly greater increase of fatty infiltration of the IS in the release group without any other differences between the 2 groups. Electromyographically, there were no pathologic findings in the non-release group at any time point. Conversely, 3 of the 9 patients of the release group showed pathologic EMG findings at 3 months, of whom 2 had recovered fully and 1 only partially at 12 months. CONCLUSION: In the presence of normal EMG findings, suprascapular nerve release added to arthroscopic RC repair is not associated with any clinical benefit, but with electromyographically documented, postoperative impairment of nerve function in 1 of 3 cases. Suprascapular nerve release does not therefore seem to be justified as an adjunct to RC repair if preoperative EMG findings document normal suprascapular nerve function. Based on these findings, the ongoing prospective randomized trial was terminated.

Continuous Paravertebral Nerve Block for Scapula Fracture Analgesia: A Case Report.

A 46-year-old man presented with severe refractory posterior shoulder pain due to a left scapular fracture sustained during a motor vehicle collision. Despite multimodal oral and intravenous analgesics, the patient's pain remained difficult to control. A continuous paravertebral nerve block was performed between the second and third thoracic vertebrae resulting in excellent analgesia of the scapular pain. This case suggests that a continuous thoracic paravertebral block placed between the second and third vertebrae may be considered as part of multimodal analgesia in patients with scapular fractures.