Dosimetric predictors for acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer: Results of a large statewide observational study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify dosimetric variables that best predict for acute esophagitis in patients treated for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a prospectively accrued statewide consortium. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving definitive radiation therapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium were included in the analysis. Dose-volume histogram data were analyzed to determine absolute volumes (cc) receiving doses from 10 to 60 Gy (V10, V20, V30, V40, V50, and V60), as well as maximum dose to 2 cc (D2cc), mean dose (MD), and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD). Logistic regression models were used to characterize the risk of toxicity as a function of dose and other covariates. The ability of each variable to predict esophagitis, individually or in a multivariate model, was quantified by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: There were 533 patients who met study criteria and were included; 437 (81.9%) developed any grade of esophagitis. Significant variables on univariate analysis for grade ≥2 esophagitis were concurrent chemotherapy, V20, V30, V40, V50, V60, MD, D2cc, and gEUD. For grade ≥3 esophagitis, the predictive variables were: V30, V40, V50, V60, MD, D2cc, and gEUD. In multivariable modeling, gEUD was the most significant predictor of both grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 esophagitis. When gEUD was excluded from the model, D2cc was selected as the most predictive variable for grade ≥3 esophagitis. For an estimated risk of grade ≥3 esophagitis of 5%, the threshold values for gEUD and D2cc were 59.3 Gy and 68 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we report the novel finding that gEUD and D2cc, rather than MD, were the most predictive dose metrics for severe esophagitis. To limit the estimated risk of grade ≥3 esophagitis to <5%, thresholds of 59.3 Gy and 68 Gy were identified for gEUD and D2cc, respectively.

[Preliminary results of whole breast helical tomotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer]. / Résultats préliminaires d'une tomothérapie hélicoïdale adjuvante avec boost intégré dans le cadre d'un traitement conservateur d'un cancer du sein.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetry and acute toxicity of helical tomotherapy for locoregional irradiation of patients after breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery treated by helical tomotherapy have been studied. The median age was 49 (min: 25, max: 69). The whole breast, tumour bed and lymph nodes were prescribed 52.2 Gy, 63.8 Gy and 50.4 Gy, all in 29 fractions. The dose per fraction was 2.2 Gy to the boost, 1.8 Gy to the breast and 1.74 Gy to the lymph node volumes. The reproducibility was analysed by recording the daily shifts in x, y and z directions and roll rotation. All toxicities were described using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects v3.0. RESULTS: Twenty-two tumours were irradiated. Six-eight percent were located in the inner quadrant. In 90 % of patients supraclavicular and internal mammary nodes were treated. The coverage of planning target volumes (PTV) was as follows: PTV boost: V107 = 0.3 % ± 0.5 SD, V95 = 98.4 % ± 1.9 SD; PTV breast: -V107 = 7.8 % ± 17.3 SD, V95 = 96.8 % ± 2.2 SD; PTV LN: V107 = 2.5 % ± 4.2 SD, V95 = 92.7 % ± 13.2 SD. The mean V20 of the homolateral lung was 18.9 % ± 3.5 SD. For left side lesion, the mean V30 of the heart was 0.9 % ± 0.8 SD. The mean V5 was: V5 homolateral lung: 73.1 % ± 11.8 ET, controlateral lung: 38.9 % ± 21, heart (left side breast): 57.3 % ± 21, controlateral breast: 15.5 % ± 9.6. Median shifts were as follow: x-axis -0.04 mm (IC 95: -0.4 +0.38), y-axis -0.37 mm ± 5.51 (IC 95: -0.88 +0.14), z-axis 2.90 mm ± 5.42 (IC 95:+2.4+3.4) and roll rotation 0.22 ± 1.10 (IC 95: -0.1+0.32). The treatment tolerance was acceptable with 1 definitive interruption couple of fractions before the end and 3 temporal interruptions for skin toxicity. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Ninety-five percent of patients experienced skin toxicity: 45 % grade 2. There were 3 cases of oesophagitis. The median follow-up of presented series is 9.7 months and all of the patients are free of disease without any residual early or late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Helical tomotherapy can achieve full target coverage while protected to the heart and ipsilateral lung. This treatment was well tolerated and reproducible. However, the low doses to normal tissue volumes need to be reduced in future studies.

Effects of neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy on 18F-FDG-PET in esophageal carcinoma.

AIM: To investigate whether results of [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) of esophageal cancer (EC) before and after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy correlate with histopathology after esophageal resection. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with EC without distant metastases were examined twice with 18F-FDG-PET during primary staging and after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. FDG standardised uptake values (SUV) were correlated with the histopathological findings (percentage of viable tumour cells, tumour regression grade 1-5). RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed a slight (not significant) positive correlation between SUV(pre) (R=0.41, p=0.08) and SUV(post) (R=0.37, p=0.11) and the percentage of viable tumour cells in the resectate. Although all patients showed a significant decrease in SUV after radio-chemotherapy (p < 0.01) the percentual decrease of the SUV after therapy (DeltaSUV%) did not significantly differ between the TRG-groups. In 12 of 20 patients (60%), therapy-induced esophagitis was detected in post-therapeutic PET images. CONCLUSION: In EC, a higher pre-therapeutic SUV might be correlated with a higher fraction of vital tumour cells remaining after radio-chemotherapy. Applying the neoadjuvant therapy protocol and the study design used in this examination, there is no correlation between decrease in SUV and histopathology.

[Laser irradiation in the complex treatment of post-burn esophagitis]. / Lazernoe obluchenie v kompleksnom lechenii posleozhogovykh ézofagitov.

The paper describes a combined therapy of postburn esophagitis the main component of which is exposure of the burnt area to laser irradiation. Good or satisfactory response was achieved in all the treated patients (n-27).

Role of gastric irradiation in management of peptic ulceration and oesophagitis.

Twenty-four patients with peptic oesophagitis or ulceration of the stomach or duodenum have been treated with irradiation of the stomach. They were selected on the grounds of their unsuitability for surgery because of associated medical conditions or because of failure of repeated gastric surgery. Twenty of the patients (83%) were 60 years of age or over. Of those treated 19 (79%) obtained complete symptomatic relief. Endoscopic improvement occurred in most cases. Acid reduction to an average of 30% of the pretreatment levels was noted at 11 months and 58% at 30 months. No morbidity was observed attributable to the irradiation.