A new grading assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis using red dichromatic imaging: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The endoscopic reference score using white-light imaging (WLI) is utilized for objectively evaluating the severity of findings in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. A novel image-enhanced endoscopy technique, red dichromatic imaging (RDI), can visualize deeper vessels in the GI tract, which may assess edema more precisely than WLI. METHODS: A total of 21 consecutive patients with eosinophilic esophagitis were prospectively evaluated. Patients were categorized according to 3 grades based on the visibility of vessels with RDI. Clinical features, such as peak eosinophil counts and presence of symptoms, were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 10 patients with RDI Grade 0/1 and 11 patients with RDI Grade 2. Peak eosinophil counts and the prevalence of heartburn were significantly higher in patients with RDI Grade 2 than in patients with RDI Grade 0/1. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of eosinophilic infiltration could be predicted more precisely using RDI than by evaluations with WLI.

Mucosal and Submucosal Thickening of Esophageal Wall Is a Promising Factor in the Development of Symptoms in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Background/Aims: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) is considered to be a potential precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, there are few clinical parameters that can be used to evaluate the disease. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the factors involved in the symptoms of EoE by examining the clinicopathological differences between aEE and EoE. Methods: We reviewed 41 patients with esophageal eosinophilia who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and high-resolution manometry. They were divided into the aEE group (n=16) and the EoE group (n=25) using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score. The patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined. Results: The median Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score was 3.0 in the aEE group and 10.0 in the EoE group. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, endoscopic findings and pathological findings. The cutoff value for wall thickening was 3.13 mm for the total esophageal wall thickness and 2.30 mm for the thickness from the surface to the muscular layer (total esophageal wall thickness: 84.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity; thickness from the surface to the muscular layer: 84.0% sensitivity, 68.7% specificity). The high-resolution manometry study was abnormal in seven patients (43.8%) in the aEE group and in 12 (48.0%) in the EoE group. The contractile front velocity was slower in the EoE group (p=0.026). Conclusions: The esophageal wall thickening in the lower portion of the esophagus is an important clinical factors related to the symptoms in patients with EoE.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a rare immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus. The main symptoms are dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and repeated food impaction. Esophageal eosinophilic infiltration is seen on histopathological examination. Progressive esophageal stenosis and other complications may occur if not detected and treated. We report a patient with pathologically confirmed EoE whose disease was detected on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). This case demonstrates the important role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Measuring esophageal compliance using functional lumen imaging probe to assess remodeling in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is associated with fibrostenotic remodeling that can be objectively assessed using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). This is typically done using a metric called distensibility plateau (DP). We aimed to describe a novel measure of compliance of the esophageal body and evaluate the associated clinical characteristics in EoE. METHODS: One hundred seventy-one adult patients with EoE (mean (SD) age 38 (12) years), 31% female and 35 healthy, asymptomatic controls who completed 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) during endoscopy, were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. The esophageal body DP and compliance were measured using a customized analysis program, with compliance calculated as (Δ esophageal body volume)/(Δ pressure) between two FLIP-filled volumes. RESULTS: In controls, the median (5-95th percentile) DP was 19.8 mm (17.9-21) and esophageal body compliance was 0.37 ml/mmHg (0.18-1.1), which was greater than in EoE (DP 19 (11-21)), compliance 0.19 (0.02-0.71), p-values <0.001. Among EoE patients, 70 (41%) had normal compliance (>0.2 ml/mmHg) and normal DP (>17 mm); 11 (6%) had normal compliance and reduced DP; 34 (20%) had reduced compliance and normal DP; and 56 (33%) had reduced compliance and reduce DP. Patients with both reduced compliance and DP had the greatest proportion of severe rings (61% with EREFS score 2-3) and stricture (100%). CONCLUSION: FLIP provides an objective evaluation of biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall that appears enhanced by complementary application of metrics of DP and esophageal body compliance.

Diagnostic Performance of Endocytoscopy for Esophageal Eosinophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophils in the esophageal epithelium are unevenly distributed in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) may be observable by endocytoscopy (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EC for the diagnosis of EE. METHODS: A total of 33 EoE patients underwent EC with methylene blue staining from March 2020 to April 2021. A total of 194 EC images with corresponding biopsies were obtained. Three findings of EC, increased squamous cells (item I), increased inflammatory cells (item II), and cells with bilobed nuclei (item III), were established. These findings were reviewed by two endoscopists to diagnose EE. Another four endoscopists reviewed the images for interobserver agreement. RESULTS: When all three items were met by EC, the sensitivity and the accuracy for the diagnosis of EE were 88% and 76%, respectively. The integrated diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for the diagnosis of EE of the four endoscopists were significant (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 2.94-5.40, p < 0.001). The results were similar when only item III was met. Interobserver agreement was good for item III to diagnose EE (kappa value = 0.653). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of EC for EE is acceptable and has good interobserver agreement. It may be useful for targeted biopsy in EoE patients.

Oesophageal wall thickness assessment at endoscopic ultrasound in children and adolescents with eosinophilic oesophagitis: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease, and an endosonographic evaluation may help the diagnosis. The main objectives of this study were to measure the thickness of the oesophageal wall using a radial endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), mucosa/submucosa (MSM), muscularis propria (MP) and mucosa to muscularis propria (MMP); to compare these measurements between patients with and without EoE; to correlate them with the Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS); and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these measurements. METHODS: Children and adolescents (aging from 4 to 17 years) were evaluated in this prospective cross-sectional study. A radial EUS at 12 MHz frequency was used, and EREFS was employed to grade macroscopic findings. Accuracy of the measurements for the diagnosis of EoE was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Twenty-six (19 M/7 F) patients (median age 10.83 years, range 5.65-17.46) were evaluated. EoE was diagnosed in 6 patients. The mean (and SD) oesophageal wall thicknesses in the distal oesophagus in millimetres in groups with and without EoE, respectively, were: MSM 1.07 (0.44) and 1.11 (0.33); MP 0.67 (0.25) and 0.60 (0.19); and MMP 1.73 (0.46) and 1.72 (0.32). Mid-oesophagus: MSM 1.16 (0.34) and 1.15 (0.34); MP 0.63 (0.16) and 0.60 (0.2); and MMP 1.79 (0.41) and 1.74 (0.34). In the ROC curve, the distal MP layer thickness presented better discriminative performance, with an area under the curve of 0.61 (95% CI 0.28-0.93) at 0.73 mm cut-off (66.67% sensitivity, 80% specificity, likelihood ratios of 3.33 for positive and 0.42 for negative test). CONCLUSION: The evaluation of oesophageal thickness measurements by EUS is not useful for diagnosing EoE.

"Imaging Findings of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases in Adults".

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are a group of conditions marked by pathologic eosinophilic infiltration of one or multiple locations in the GI tract. Conditions include eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis, and eosinophilic colitis. The site and depth of eosinophilic infiltration of the GI tract usually determines clinical presentation. These conditions should be considered in the differential diagnosis for several GI symptoms, such as food impaction or dysphagia. Histopathology is the gold standard for diagnosis of eosinophilic disorders. Nevertheless, findings from endoscopy, barium studies, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, can aid in the diagnosis, by allowing for earlier diagnosis as well as proper management. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are typically managed with corticosteroids or dietary elimination. A high index of suspicion is required for diagnosis as it can often be challenging.

Distal esophageal wall thickness correlates with dysphagia in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Thickening of the esophageal wall in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been shown in studies using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We hypothesise that transmural inflammation in EoE results in prominent esophageal wall thickening compared with the mucosal inflammation in GERD. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship among dysphagia, endoscopic appearance, wall thickness, histology, and motility in EoE and GORD. METHODS: EoE and GERD patients were prospectively studied between February 2012 and April 2021. Patients were studied on 2 separate occasions with endoscopy, EUS and mucosal biopsies, followed by high-resolution manometry. Epidemiology and dysphagia data were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients (31 EoE, 14 GERD) were included. There were no significant differences in age, sex, duration of disease and presence of esophageal motility disorders. EoE patients had a higher dysphagia score (P < 0.001), EREFS score (P < 0.001) and peak eosinophil count (P < 0.001) compared with GERD patients. Thickness of the submucosa in the distal esophagus in EoE was significantly higher than GERD (P = 0.003) and positively correlated with duration of disease (P = 0.01, R = 0.67). Positive correlation was also found between dysphagia score and distal total esophageal wall thickness (P = 0.03, R = 0.39) in EoE patients. No correlation was found between these variables in GERD patients. CONCLUSION: Distal esophageal wall thickness positively correlates with dysphagia score in EoE but not GERD. This appears to be related to the composition of the submucosa which can be identified using EUS.

Beige mucosa observable under narrow-band imaging indicates the active sites of eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The majority of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are likely to have observable features under narrow-band imaging, namely beige mucosa. However, the histological features and clinical implications of beige mucosa have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether beige mucosa could serve as an endoscopic marker for predicting active inflammatory sites of EoE. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed both the narrow-band images and biopsied specimens of 77 esophageal lesions from 35 consecutive patients with EoE. We divided these specimens into two groups: target biopsied specimens from beige mucosa (beige group) and specimens biopsied from non-beige mucosa (non-beige group). The number of eosinophils per high-powered field, thickness of the superficial differentiated cell layer, and depth of the hemoglobin component from the surface layer were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Forty-four out of the 45 specimens were diagnosed as histological active lesions in the beige group. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of beige mucosa in predicting EoE activity were 97.8%, 96.9%, and 97.8%, respectively. Compared with the non-beige group, specimens in the beige group had a significantly thinner superficial differentiated cell layer. CONCLUSIONS: Beige mucosa is associated with thinning of the normal superficial differentiated cell layer, and these histological changes in the active inflammatory sites of EoE could be recognized endoscopically as color differences. Beige mucosa may serve as an endoscopic indicator for predicting the histological activity of EoE.

Lymphocytic Esophagitis Is Not Similar to Eosinophilic Esophagitis Except for Seasonal Variation.

OBJECTIVE: Unlike eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), there is no consensus on the minimum number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) that is diagnostic of lymphocytic esophagitis (LyE). The aim of this study was to determine whether significant correlations exist between the numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) in esophageal biopsies and clinical and endoscopic manifestations usually associated with EoE. METHODS: H&E slides from esophageal biopsies from 330 patients were reviewed. The number of IEL and intraepithelial eosinophils (IEE) per mm2 was counted in the area with the highest concentration in each biopsy. The numbers were then correlated with clinical and endoscopic findings. RESULTS: As expected, a higher number of IEE was significantly associated with food impaction (p=0.001), dysphagia (p=0.021), esophageal stricture (p=0.017), rings (P<0.0001), and furrows (p<0.0001). By contrast, there was no significant association between increased IEL and any of the aforementioned clinical and endoscopic features in the original 330 patients or in a subset of 233 patients with no IEE. Interestingly, the number of both IEE and IEL varied significantly by the season when the biopsy was obtained, being lowest in the fall and highest in the spring (p=0002 for IEE and p<0.0001 for IEL). CONCLUSION: In esophageal biopsies, increased IEL has no significant correlation with food impaction or dysphagia or with esophageal stricture, rings, or furrows. There is significant variation in the number of IEL depending on the season when the biopsy is obtained, which has not been previously reported.

The functional lumen imaging probe in gastrointestinal disorders: the past, present, and future.

The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a diagnostic tool that utilizes impedance planimetry to allow the assessment of luminal diameter and distensibility. It has been used primarily in esophageal diseases, in particular, in the assessment of achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The usage and publications have increased over the past decade and it is now an essential tool in the armamentarium of the esophagologist. Indications are emerging outside of the esophagus, in particular with regard to gastroparesis. Our paper will review the history of FLIP, optimal current usage, data for key esophageal disorders (including achalasia, reflux, and EoE), data for nonesophageal disorders, and our sense as to whether FLIP is ready for prime time, as well as gaps in evidence and suggestions for future research.

Clinical Features of Esophageal Eosinophilia According to Endoscopic Phenotypes.

Objective Esophageal eosinophilia (EE), a histological hallmark of eosinophilic esophagitis, is classified into two endoscopic phenotypes: localized and diffuse EE. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of EE localized in the lower esophagus and to describe its clinical features in comparison with diffuse EE. Methods Data from 81 consecutive patients with EE were retrospectively investigated. EE was histologically defined as ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field. Based on the endoscopic appearance with a histological assessment, EE was classified as either diffuse or localized type. We compared the clinical features, including the medical treatment and natural course, between the two types. Results Of the 81 patients, 52 (64.2%) had diffuse EE, and 29 (35.8%) had localized EE. Among men patients, localized EE was significantly more common than diffuse EE. In localized EE, dysphagia and food impaction were less prevalent, and the presence of rings was significantly less common than in diffuse EE. Acid-suppressive therapy was administered to only 3 of the 29 patients with localized EE. In asymptomatic patients, especially those with localized EE, endoscopic abnormalities did not worsen but rather improved in some findings, such as with regard to furrows or exudate, during the natural course of three years without medical treatment. Conclusion Localized EE has a strong predilection for men patients and accounted for more than one third of all cases of EE. This condition appears to be less symptomatic and necessitates milder medical treatment than diffuse EE and might not worsen progressively.

Oral Administration of 99mTechnetium-Labeled Heparin in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if heparin labeled with 99mTechnetium (99mTc) could be an imaging probe to detect eosinophil-related inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis and to determine the biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 99mTc-heparin oral administration using image-based dosimetry models with esophageal modeling. METHODS: Freshly prepared 99mTc-heparin was administered orally to 5 research subjects. Radioactivity was measured by whole-body scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography during the 24 hours postadministration. Following imaging, endoscopic examination was performed. The biodistribution of esophageal radioactivity was compared with endoscopic findings, eosinophil counts in biopsy tissues, and immunostaining for eosinophil granule major basic protein-1 (eMBP1). These studies were conducted from July 1, 2013, until April 22, 2017. RESULTS: Oral administration of 99mTc-heparin was well tolerated in all 5 subjects. The entire esophagus could be visualized dynamically during oral administration. Bound esophageal radioactivity marked areas of inflammation as judged by endoscopy scores, by eosinophils per high power field and by localization of eMBP1 using immunostaining. Ninety percent of the radioactivity did not bind to the esophagus and passed through the gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSION: The biodistribution of ingested 99mTc-heparin is almost exclusively localized to the gastrointestinal tract. Radiation exposure was highest in the lower gastrointestinal tract and was comparable with other orally administered diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals. The use of swallowed 99mTc-heparin may aid in assessing eosinophil-related inflammation in the esophagus.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: imaging features with endoscopic and pathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to review the imaging features of eosinophilic esophagitis on fluoroscopy and present how they can correlate with endoscopic and pathologic findings. RESULTS: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated disease that results in esophageal dysfunction. Upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy is high yield and required for biopsies to demonstrate the hallmark histologic findings of eosinophil-predominant inflammation. While esophagogastroduodenoscopy is currently mandatory for diagnosis, imaging findings can provide valuable information regarding the structural and functional properties of the esophagus. In addition, fluoroscopic studies may be very helpful in the setting of subtle findings and to evaluate fibrotic remodeling changes. CONCLUSION: Radiologic examinations are a valuable tool in the assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis and can highlight changes of fibrostenotic disease, as overall narrowing can be more conspicuous fluoroscopically than endoscopically. As the disease increases in prevalence, it is critical that physicians recognize this condition and facilitate diagnosis and treatment.

Heartburn and dyspepsia symptom severity improves after treatment and correlates with histology in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Non-dysphagia symptoms, such as heartburn and dyspepsia, are poorly characterized in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). It is unclear if treatment improves these symptoms. The aim of this paper was to assess (i) heartburn and dyspepsia symptom severity in adult EoE patients using validated symptom measures; (ii) change in symptoms after treatment; and (iii) symptom association with endoscopic and histologic features. In a prospective cohort of adult EoE patients who were not responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy, non-dysphagia symptoms were assessed with heartburn items from the validated GERD-HRQL (gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life) and SODA (severity of dyspepsia assessment) instruments. Subjects completed the questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. Association of baseline symptoms with endoscopic and histologic features, and before and after treatment with diet or topical steroids, was assessed. Eighty-six EoE patients (mean age 39 years, 57% male, 95% white) completed a baseline questionnaire and 62 completed the follow-up questionnaire. The mean baseline GERD-HRQL score was 4.5 ± 6.5 and the mean total SODA score was 41.0 ± 12.6. At baseline, there was a weak but significant correlation between peak eosinophils and the SODA score (r = 0.28; p = 0.03) and no association between heartburn and SODA scores and endoscopic or other histologic findings. After treatment, there was a decrease in GERD-HRQL heartburn (4.3 vs. 2.6; p = 0.04) and SODA (49.5 vs. 35.5; p = 0.04) scores in histologic responders, but not in nonresponders. In a prospective cohort of EoE patients, baseline eosinophils positively correlated with dyspepsia severity. Heartburn and dyspepsia symptoms improved after treatment in histologic responders.

Obesity and hiatal hernia may be non-allergic risk factors for esophageal eosinophilia in Japanese adults.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) is a basal condition of eosinophilic esophageal disorders including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and asymptomatic EE. EoE is considered as an allergic disorder, while it is unclear whether other non-allergic conditions are involved in the pathophysiology of EE. The aim of this study is to investigate the non-allergic risk factors for EE. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included subjects who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy on a medical health check-up. We compared clinical characteristics between subjects with EE (n = 27) and those without EE (n = 5937). RESULTS: The detection rate of EE was 0.45% (27/5964 persons). Of 27 subjects with EE, 20 subjects were symptomatic and 7 were asymptomatic. On univariate analysis, subjects with EE significantly had higher body mass index (BMI) compared to those without EE; 23.4 (4.4) vs 22.3 (4.5) kg/m2, median (interquartile range), p = 0.005. Endoscopic findings revealed that subjects with EE had significantly higher proportion of hiatal hernia (29.6% vs 14.7%; p = 0.049). Subjects with EE were significantly younger and had higher proportion of bronchial asthma; 45 (11.5) vs 51 (18) years, p = 0.013; 25.9% vs 5.2%, p < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that subjects with EE were positively associated with BMI [odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.20; p = 0.010) and hiatal hernia (OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.12-6.18; p = 0.026) compared to those without EE. On trend test, advanced BMI classification had significant trend for increased prevalence of EE (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and hiatal hernia may be non-allergic risk factors for EE in Japanese adults.