Effect of concomitant use of esomeprazole on levodopa pharmacokinetics and clinical symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which inhibit gastric acid secretion, are frequently prescribed to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa, the gold-standard treatment for PD, demonstrates enhanced solubility in acidic environments. Although PPIs increase gastric pH and may affect levodopa absorption, the effect of concomitant PPI use on levodopa pharmacokinetics in patients with PD remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the concomitant use of esomeprazole, a PPI, on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa and clinical symptoms in patients with PD. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients with PD and compared the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa and clinical symptoms before and two weeks after the concomitant use of esomeprazole. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of levodopa 30 min after concomitant oral administration of levodopa and esomeprazole were significantly lower (4.92 ± 4.10 µmol/L) than those without concomitant esomeprazole use (6.26 ± 3.75 µmol/L; p = 0.027). The plasma concentrations of carbidopa showed no significant differences with respect to concomitant esomeprazole use. Significant elevation was recorded in all subscores of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale scores after concomitant use of esomeprazole. No significant differences were observed between Helicobacter pylori-negative and Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. Non-elderly patients (age ≤ 70 years) tended to be more susceptible to the effect of esomeprazole on levodopa pharmacokinetics and clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The unnecessary use of PPIs should be avoided in patients with PD, especially in non-elderly patients, to improve absorption of levodopa.

Characterization of mavacamten pharmacokinetics in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to inform dose titration.

Mavacamten is a selective, allosteric, reversible cardiac myosin inhibitor that has been developed for the treatment of adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed to characterize mavacamten pharmacokinetics (PK) and the variation in mavacamten exposure associated with intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Data from 12 clinical studies (phases 1, 2, and 3) were used. Evaluable participants were those who had at least one mavacamten concentration measurement with associated sampling time and dosing information. The base model included key covariates: body weight, cytochrome P450 isozyme 2C19 (CYP2C19) phenotype with respect to PK, and formulation. The final model was generated using stepwise covariate testing and refinement processes. Simulations were performed to evaluate PK: apparent clearance (CL/F); apparent central and peripheral volumes of distribution; and steady-state average, trough, and maximum concentrations. Overall, 9244 measurable PK observations from 497 participants were included. A two-compartment model structure was selected. After stepwise covariate model building and refinement, additional covariates included were: specified mavacamten dose, omeprazole or esomeprazole administration, health/disease status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, fed status, and sex. The final PopPK model accurately characterized mavacamten concentrations. At any given dose, CYP2C19 phenotype was the most influential covariate on exposure parameters (e.g., median CL/F was reduced by 72% in CYP2C19:poor metabolizers compared with the reference participant [CYP2C19:normal metabolizer]). CL/F was also approximately 16% higher in women than in men but lower in participants receiving concomitant omeprazole or esomeprazole (by 33% and 42%, respectively) than in participants not receiving such concomitant therapy.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions and safety of atogepant coadministered with esomeprazole.

Aim: To investigate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between atogepant and esomeprazole. Methods: Atogepant, esomeprazole, or both were administered to 32 healthy adults in an open-label, nonrandomized, crossover study. Systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] and peak plasma concentration [Cmax]) for atogepant administered in combination versus alone were compared using a linear mixed effects model. Results: Coadministration with esomeprazole delayed atogepant time to Cmax by ∼1.5 h and reduced Cmax by ∼23% with no statistically significant change in AUC compared with atogepant alone. Administration of atogepant 60 mg alone or in combination with esomeprazole 40 mg was well tolerated in healthy adults. Conclusion: Esomeprazole had no clinically meaningful effect on atogepant pharmacokinetics. Clinical Trial Registration: unregistered phase I study.

A clinical study was conducted in 32 healthy adults to evaluate the possibility of interactions between atogepant, a new drug for the prevention of migraine, and esomeprazole, a drug used to reduce stomach acid. The participants of the study were given each drug alone and together to understand the effect they had on the body's ability to absorb, distribute, and excrete each drug alone and together. The results of this study show that there are no clinically important changes in how atogepant is processed by the body when administered with esomeprazole, and they can be safely taken together.

Comparison of the acid suppression effects between low-dose esomeprazole and famotidine in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Famotidine, an H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), is mainly prescribed to alleviate the early symptoms of gastritis. Our aim was to explore the possibilities of low-dose esomeprazole as a treatment of gastritis as well as the pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of esomeprazole and famotidine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, multiple-dose, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted with a 7-day washout between periods. For each period, the subjects were administered one dose of esomeprazole 10 mg or famotidine 20 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg each day. To evaluate the PDs, the 24-hour gastric pH was recorded after single and multiple doses. The mean percentage of time during which the gastric pH was above 4 was evaluated for PD assessment. To confirm the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of esomeprazole, blood was collected for up to 24 hours after multiple doses. RESULTS: 26 subjects completed the study. Following the multiple doses of esomeprazole 10 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg, and famotidine 20 mg, the mean percentages of time during which the gastric pH was above 4 over the course of 24 hour were 35.77 ± 19.56%, 53.75 ± 20.55%, and 24.48 ± 17.36%, respectively. After multiple doses, the time of peak plasma concentration at steady state (tmax,ss) was 1.00 and 1.25 hours for 10 and 20 mg of esomeprazole, respectively. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% confidence interval of area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve in steady state (AUCT,ss) and maximum concentration of drug in plasma in steady state (Cmax,ss) for esomeprazole 10 mg compared to 20 mg were 0.3654 (0.3381 - 0.3948) and 0.5066 (0.4601 - 0.5579), respectively. CONCLUSION: The PD parameters of esomeprazole 10 mg were comparable to those of famotidine after multiple doses. These findings provide support for further evaluating the use of 10 mg of esomeprazole as a treatment option for gastritis.

Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, and Safety of Esomeprazole Magnesium Enteric-Coated Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

This bioequivalence study is critically important for drug production. Recently, a local pharmaceutical company produced esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated capsules, a major drug to help to eradicate Helicobacter pylori, but the bioequivalence is not well known. The present study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of the 2 esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated capsules and their pharmacokinetics and safety in 3 biological equivalence trials: fasting, feeding, and mixing. The fasting and mixing trials used single-centered randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, and 2-sequence crossover design, while the fed trials used single-centered, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, 3-period, 3-sequence partial crossover design. For the fasting and mixing trials, each of the 32 subjects was fasted overnight prior to taking the test preparations or reference preparations. In the fed trial, 54 subjects were given a high-fat meal 1 hour before the drugs were administered. Blood specimens from all subjects were collected against the light within 14 hours, with the plasma drug concentration being detected by the validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis method. Geometric mean ratio of maximum concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity with 90% confidence interval were calculated. The data from fasting, mixing, and fed trials met the bioequivalence criteria. No serious adverse reactions were found, suggesting that the test and reference preparations of esomeprazole magnesium enteric capsules have similar safety profile.

A population PK-PD model of YH4808, a novel P-CAB, and intragastric pH that incorporated negative feedback by increased intragastric pH onto the systemic exposure to YH4808.

YH4808 is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that is under clinical development to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer diseases. In this study, the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of YH4808 were modeled in healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose of YH4808 at 30, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg or matching placebo and multiple once-daily oral doses of YH4808 at 100, 200, and 400 mg or matching placebo for 7 days. A population PK-PD model adequately described the time-concentration-effect profiles of YH4808. The maximum increasing effect of YH4808 on intragastric pH was 4.38, which was higher than the observed maximum increase in intragastric pH after omeprazole at 40 mg (2.2 in pH). The maximum inhibitory effect by the increased intragastric pH on the exposure to repeated YH4808 was 58% from baseline. Monte-Carlo simulation experiments based on the final model showed that YH4808 at 200 mg will produce a higher percentage of time at pH > 4 over 24 h on day 1 than observed value of esomeprazole at 40 mg once-daily, an active comparator (84.7% time vs. 58.3% time, respectively). Because YH4808 at ≥200 mg resulted in a higher percentage of time at intragastric pH > 4 than seen after once-daily esomeprazole at 40 mg and YH4808 showed acceptable tolerability at a single-dose of 30-800 mg, we suggest to test the 200 mg once daily dosage regimen in further clinical trials of YH4808.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of trazpiroben (TAK-906) in the presence and absence of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole.

Trazpiroben, a dopamine D2 /D3 receptor antagonist under development to treat gastroparesis, displays decreasing solubility with increasing pH. This single-sequence, open-label, two-period, crossover study evaluated the effect of esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor that raises gastric pH, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of trazpiroben in healthy adults (NCT03849690). In total, 12 participants were enrolled and entered period 1 (days 1-3), receiving a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg on day 1. After a 4-day washout, participants then entered period 2 (days 8-13) and received esomeprazole 40 mg once daily on days 8-12, with a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg co-administered 1 h post esomeprazole dosing on day 11. Geometric mean area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞ ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) values were generally similar when trazpiroben was administered alone versus alongside esomeprazole (AUC∞ , 44.03 vs. 38.85 ng h/ml; Cmax , 19.76 vs. 17.24 ng/ml). Additionally, the associated geometric mean ratio (GMR; co-administration: administration alone) 90% confidence intervals (CIs) suggested no clinically meaningful difference between treatment groups (AUC∞ , GMR 0.88, 90% CI 0.78-1.00; Cmax , 0.87, 90% CI 0.70-1.09). Mean apparent first-order terminal elimination half-life values were similar between treatments, illustrating co-administration with esomeprazole had minimal effect on trazpiroben elimination. Trazpiroben was well-tolerated in healthy adults following administration alone and alongside esomeprazole, with no clinically relevant adverse events reported. The lack of evidence of any clinically meaningful drug-drug interaction supports the co-administration of esomeprazole with trazpiroben.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction and Safety of Ubrogepant Coadministered With Esomeprazole Magnesium.

Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for the acute treatment of migraine. Esomeprazole magnesium increases intragastric pH, which may affect oral ubrogepant absorption. This open-label, nonrandomized, crossover trial evaluated esomeprazole magnesium's impact on the pharmacokinetics and safety of coadministered ubrogepant in healthy adults. Participants received ubrogepant 100 mg on day 1, esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg on days 9 to 13, and ubrogepant 100 mg with esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg on day 14. No effect on ubrogepant pharmacokinetics was concluded if 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios were within 80% to 125% for comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters between ubrogepant + esomeprazole magnesium versus ubrogepant alone. Thirty participants enrolled (mean age, 31.7 years; 53.3% males). Ubrogepant peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) decreased 23%, time to Cmax increased by 1.5 hours, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve was reduced by ≈10% when coadministered with esomeprazole magnesium versus ubrogepant alone. The 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratio for Cmax did not fall within the 80% to 125% equivalence range, but the decrease was not considered clinically meaningful. Esomeprazole magnesium coadministered with ubrogepant did not increase the incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events, and interactions between the medications are likely to have limited clinical relevance.

Multivariate Assessment for Bioequivalence Based on the Correlation of Random Effect.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bioequivalence tests are fundamental step in assessing the equivalence in bioavailability between a test and reference product. In practice, two separate linear mixed models (LMMs) with random subject effects, which have an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak concentration (Cmax) as the responses, have become the gold standard for evaluating bioequivalence. Recently, Lee et al developed a multivariate hierarchical generalized linear model (HGLM) for several responses that modeled correlations among multivariate responses via correlated random effects. The objective of this study was to apply this multivariate analysis to the bioequivalence test in practice and to compare the performance of multivariate HGLM and separate LMMs. METHODS: Three pharmacokinetic datasets, fixed-dose combination (naproxen and esomeprazole), tramadol and fimasartan data were analyzed. We compared the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of a test product to a reference product using the multivariate HGLM and two conventional separate LMMs. RESULTS: We found that the 90% CIs for the GMRs of both AUC and Cmax from the multivariate HGLM were narrower than those from the separate LMMs: (0.843, 1.152) vs (0.825, 1.177) for Cmax of esomeprazole in fixed-dose combination data; (0.805, 0.931) vs (0.797, 0.941) for Cmax in tramadol data; (0.801, 1.501) vs (0.762, 1.578) for Cmax and (1.163, 1.332) vs (1.009, 1.341) for AUC in fimasartan data, consistent with the random subject effects from two separate LMMs being highly correlated in the three datasets (correlation coefficient r = 0.883; r = 0.966; r = 0.832). CONCLUSION: This multivariate HGLM had good performance in the bioequivalence test with multiple endpoints. This method would provide a more reasonable option to reduce the 90% CI by adding correlation parameters and thus an advantage especially in evaluating the bioequivalence of highly variable drugs with broad 90% CIs.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Cross-Over, Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Esomeprazole delayed release tablets (ESO) are one of the most effective treatments for acid-related disorders. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (IR-ESO) compared to those of the esomeprazole delayed release tablet 20 mg (ESO). In addition, the impact of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on PK and PD was evaluated. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, and 2-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy Chinese subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 5 days. After single- and multiple-dosing administration, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-h pH monitoring. The CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95%CI)] of IR-ESO/ESO for AUCinf [single dose: 103.60% (96.58%, 111.14%), multiple doses: 101.65% (97.88%, 105.57%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The AUCinf showed an increasing trend between CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer (EM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), and poor metabolizer (PM) after single-dose and multiple-dose administration (p < 0.05). The GMR (95%CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline [single dose: 101.07% (96.56%, 105.78%), multiple doses: 101.24% (97.74%, 104.86%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline was significant difference between EM, IM, and PM after single-dose IR-ESO and ESO (p < 0.05). Drugs were all well tolerated, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between IR-ESO and ESO. CONCLUSION: This study showed that IR-ESO can inhibit the secretion of gastric acid rapidly and continuously, and that the PK and PD of IR-ESO are affected by CYP2C19 genotypes. The GMR (95% CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for AUCinf and the percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline were all within the range of 80.00-125.00%. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900024935.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Fixed-Dose Combination of Esomeprazole and Calcium Carbonate (AD-206) to the Conventional Esomeprazole.

PURPOSE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Demands for enhanced stability and faster onset led to the development of AD-206, a fixed-dose combination of a PPI (esomeprazole) with an antacid salt (calcium carbonate). This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of AD-206 (Addpharma) with conventional esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted with 2 different doses of esomeprazole at 20 and 40 mg with a fixed calcium carbonate dose of 600 mg in AD-206. Forty-four subjects were included in each dose group and randomly received either AD-206 or the conventional esomeprazole for 7 consecutive days in each period. After a single- and multiple-dose, blood samples for the PK analysis were analyzed, and 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring was conducted. RESULTS: The systemic exposure of esomeprazole after a multiple-dose of AD-206 was similar to that of the conventional esomeprazole in both doses, but the time to reach the peak concentration was faster in AD-206. The percentage decrease from baseline in the integrated gastric acidity for a 24-hour interval after the dose was not significantly different between the AD-206 and the conventional esomeprazole after a single- and multiple-dose for both doses, and the time to reach pH 4 was faster for AD-206. CONCLUSION: AD-206 showed a similar systemic exposure and suppression of gastric acid secretion after a multiple-dose compared to the conventional esomeprazole.

Regulating Interactions Between Targeted Nanocarriers and Mononuclear Phagocyte System via an Esomeprazole-Based Preconditioning Strategy.

PURPOSE: The mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) presents a formidable obstacle that hampers the delivery of various nanopreparations to tumors. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve the off-MPS targeting ability of nanomedicines. In the present study, we present a novel preconditioning strategy to substantially increase the circulation times and tumor targeting of nanoparticles by regulating nanocarrier-MPS interactions. METHODS: In vitro, the effect of different vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitors on macrophage uptake of targeted or nontargeted lipid vesicles was evaluated. Specifically, the clinically approved proton-pump inhibitor esomeprazole (ESO) was selected as a preconditioning agent. Then, we further investigated the blocking effect of ESO on the macrophage endocytosis of nanocarriers. In vivo, ESO was first intravenously administered into A549-tumor-bearing nude mice, and 24 h later, the c(RGDm7)-modified vesicles co-loaded with doxorubicin and gefitinib were intravenously injected. RESULTS: In vitro, ESO was found to reduce the interactions between macrophages and c(RGDm7)-modified vesicles by interfering with the latter's lysosomal trafficking. Studies conducted in vivo confirmed that ESO pretreatment greatly decreased the liver and spleen distribution of the targeted vesicles, enhanced their tumor accumulation, and improved the therapeutic outcome of the drug-loaded nanomedicines. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that ESO can regulate the nanoparticle-MPS interaction, which provides a feasible option for enhancing the off-MPS targeting of nanomedicines.

Simultaneous separation of naproxen and 6-O-desmethylnaproxen metabolite in saliva samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Pharmacokinetic study of naproxen alone and associated with esomeprazole.

Naproxen is a widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the control of postoperative inflammatory signs and symptoms in dentistry. Its association with esomeprazole has been widely studied and has yielded good results for the control of acute pain, even with the delayed absorption of naproxen owing to the presence of esomeprazole. To further understand the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of this drug alone and in combination with esomeprazole, we will analyze the pharmacokinetic parameters of naproxen and its major metabolite, 6-O-desmethylnaproxen, in saliva samples. A rapid, sensitive, and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous determination of naproxen and 6-O-desmethylnaproxen in saliva will be developed and validated. Sequential saliva samples from six patients will be analyzed before and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 8, 11, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after the ingestion of one naproxen tablet (500 mg) and esomeprazole-associated naproxen tablets (500 + 20 mg), at two different times. After liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate and HCl, the samples will be analyzed using an 8040 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Separation of naproxen and its major metabolic products will be performed using a Shim-Pack XR-ODS 75Lx2.0 column and C18 pre-column (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 40°C using a mixture of methanol and 10 mM ammonium acetate (70:30, v/v) with an injection flow of 0.3 mL/min. The total analytical run time will be 5 min. The detection and quantification of naproxen and its metabolite will be validated, which elucidate the pharmacokinetics of this drug, thereby contributing to its proper prescription for the medical and dental interventions that cause acute pain.

Effect of High-Dose Esomeprazole on CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 Activities in Humans: Evidence for Substantial and Long-lasting Inhibition of CYP2C19.

In vitro, esomeprazole is a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2C19. Additionally, racemic omeprazole induces CYP1A2 and omeprazole and its metabolites inhibit CYP3A4 in vitro. In this 5-phase study, 10 healthy volunteers ingested 20 mg pantoprazole, 0.5 mg midazolam, and 50 mg caffeine as respective index substrates for CYP2C19, 3A4, and 1A2 before and 1, 25, 49 (pantoprazole only), and 73 hours after an 8-day pretreatment with 80 mg esomeprazole twice daily. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of R-pantoprazole increased 4.92-fold (90% confidence interval (CI) 3.55-6.82), 2.31-fold (90% CI 1.85-2.88), and 1.33-fold (90% CI 1.06-1.68) at the 1-hour, 25-hour, and 73-hour phases, respectively, consistent with a substantial and persistent inhibition of CYP2C19. The AUC of midazolam increased up to 1.44-fold (90% CI 1.22-1.72) and the paraxanthine/caffeine metabolic ratio up to 1.19-fold (90% CI 1.04-1.36), when the index substrates were taken 1 hour after esomeprazole. Based on the recovery of R-pantoprazole oral clearance, the turnover half-life of CYP2C19 was estimated to average 53 hours. Pharmacokinetic simulation based on the observed concentrations of esomeprazole and its metabolites as well as their published CYP2C19 inhibitory constants was well in line with the observed changes in R-pantoprazole pharmacokinetics during the course of the study. Extrapolations assuming linear pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole suggested weak to moderate inhibition at 20 and 40 mg twice daily dosing. In conclusion, high-dose esomeprazole can cause strong inhibition of CYP2C19, but only weakly inhibits CYP3A4 and leads to minor induction of CYP1A2. The enzymatic activity of CYP2C19 recovers gradually in ~ 3-4 days after discontinuation of esomeprazole treatment.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of esomeprazole in Japanese subjects with various CYP2C19 phenotypes.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, is a proton pump inhibitor which has been approved by over 125 countries, also known as NEXIUM® . Esomeprazole was developed to provide further improvement on efficacy for acid-related diseases with higher systemic bioavailability due to the less first-pass metabolism and lower plasma clearance. Esomeprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP2C19. Approximately <1% of Caucasians and 5%-10% of Asians have absent CYP2C19 enzyme activity. Although the influence of various CYP2C19 phenotypes on esomeprazole pharmacokinetics has been studied, this is the first report in the Japanese population where 27 low CYP2C19 metabolizers were included. METHODS: In this study, a population PK model describing the PK of esomeprazole was developed to understand the difference of CYP2C19 phenotypes on clearance in the Japanese population. The model quantitatively assessed the influence of CYP2C19 phenotype on esomeprazole PK in healthy Japanese male subjects after receiving repeated oral dosing. The inhibition mechanism of esomeprazole on CYP2C19 activity was also included in the model. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: CYP2C19 phenotype and dose were found as statistically significant covariates on esomeprazole clearance. The apparent clearance at 10-mg dose was 17.32, 9.77 and 7.37 (L/h) for homozygous extensive metabolizer, heterozygous extensive metabolizer and poor metabolizer subjects, respectively. And the apparent clearance decreased as dose increased. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The established population PK model well described the esomeprazole PK and model-predicted esomeprazole PK was in good agreement with external clinical data, suggesting the robustness and applicability of the current model for predicting esomeprazole PK.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict exposures in healthy Japanese subjects with different CYP2C19 phenotypes: Esomeprazole case study
.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to improve the predictive performance of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 substrates in Japanese subjects using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Esomeprazole, a CYP2C19 substrate, was selected as a test compound, and the Simcyp simulator was used for pharmacokinetic prediction. The compound file of esomeprazole model developed in healthy Caucasian subjects was applied directly. The population file "Sim-Japanese" in Simcyp was adopted to predict esomeprazole pharmacokinetics in Japanese, while CYP2C19 enzyme abundances in the liver and the gastrointestinal tract for homozygous extensive metabolizers (homo EMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetero EMs), and poor metabolizers (PMs) were adjusted to be the same as in Caucasians. RESULTS: The PBPK model predicted esomeprazole exposure after 10-, 20-, and 40-mg doses in Japanese subjects within 1.5-fold of observed values in all three -CYP2C19 phenotypes. The reported concentration-time profiles were mostly well-captured within the 95% prediction intervals. CONCLUSION: By adjusting CYP2C19 enzyme abundances levels in the Japanese population, the systemic exposure of esomeprazole in Japanese subjects can be reasonably extrapolated using a PBPK model developed in Caucasian subjects. This analysis serves as a case application for assessing the predictive performance of CYP2C19 substrate in Japanese subjects by using PBPK modeling approach.

The safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of immediate-release formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg/sodium bicarbonate 800 mg in healthy adult male.

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole is the most effective treatment for acid-related disorders and is widely used with enteric coating due to rapid degradation in the acidic environment. However, the enteric-coated formulation delays absorption and onset of action. To overcome this limitation, an immediate-release formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 800 mg (IR-ESO) was developed. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of IR-ESO compared to those of esomeprazole 20 mg (ESO). METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 7 days. After single and multiple dosing, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-hr pH monitoring. RESULTS: Plasma esomeprazole exposure of IR-ESO was similar to that of ESO after single and multiple dosing. Time to peak concentration of IR-ESO (0.50-0.75 hr) was shorter than that of ESO (1.25-1.50 hr). Percentage changes in 24-hr integrated gastric acidity from baseline for IR-ESO were similar to those for ESO. In addition, mean time to maintain gastric pH >4 for 24 hr was similar for both drugs (IR-ESO 55.5-69.9% vs ESO 56.8-70.2%). Evaluation of time to first reach pH 4 after dosing indicated that IR-ESO showed a faster onset than ESO. All subjects found the drug tolerable, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between two drugs. CONCLUSION: This study showed that IR-ESO produced a rapid, safe and sustained gastric acid suppression (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03211143).

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control.

AIMS: The objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control, and then recommend the dosage regimen for Phase 2b/3 studies. METHODS: Three clinical studies were performed. First, 16 healthy subjects received infusion of ilaprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 80 mg. Second, 12 healthy subjects received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days. Finally, 20 patients with duodenal ulcers received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days or esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 3 days. Serial blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded. RESULTS: The mean percentages time of intragastric pH >6 was 63.6 and 51.7% for healthy subjects after receiving ilaprazole 30 mg and esomeprazole 80 mg. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed when the dose was increased to 30 mg but the effect was saturated. Ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days provided higher plasma exposure in healthy subjects than patients, but the effect was comparable. After multiple administrations, ilaprazole provided similar effect to esomeprazole. Ilaprazole infusion was safe and well tolerated without serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole provided comparable effect of pH control to esomeprazole, with lower dose and fewer times of administration. There was no significant difference of ilaprazole between healthy subjects and patients regarding intragastric acid inhibition. A loading dose of ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days was recommended for Phase 2b/3 studies.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model adequately predicted the human pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808, a novel K+-competitive acid blocker.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed for YH4808, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, using the SimCYP® Simulator based on the physicochemical, in vitro preclinical and clinical data of YH4808. The PBPK model was optimized using YH4808 concentrations obtained from the single-dose phase I clinical trial. Overall, the PBPK model adequately predicted the observed pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808 in humans. The pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808 after multiple oral administrations were predicted using a refined PBPK model. The ratios of model-predicted to observed Cmax, AUCinf and AUCτ values on Day 1 and Day 7 at 100 mg were 0.7-1.0. However, the model failed to predict a decreased exposure after multiple oral administration particularly at higher doses of 200 and 400 mg. The reduced solubility of YH4808 at higher pH was hypothesized as the main cause of the reduction in exposure such that absorption was decreased as pH was increased. This hypothesis was confirmed by PBPK modeling and simulation, where intragastric pH was increased by YH4808.

Oral esomeprazole in Japanese pediatric patients with gastric acid-related disease: Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used for the treatment of gastric acid-related disease, but they are not approved for use in children in Japan. To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy (gastrointestinal symptom improvement) of PPI in Japanese pediatric patients with gastric acid-related disease, we conducted an 8 week, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase I/III study of once-daily oral esomeprazole use. METHODS: Japanese children, aged 1-14 years with gastric acid-related disease, were stratified by weight and age into five groups (10 patients/group) to receive esomeprazole as granules for suspension (10 mg) or capsules (10 mg or 20 mg) once daily. RESULTS: Esomeprazole was absorbed and eliminated rapidly in all groups, with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration of 1.47-1.75 h, an arithmetic mean terminal elimination half-life of 0.80-1.37 h, and a weight-correlated apparent total body clearance of 0.216-0.343 L/h/kg. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval and maximum plasma drug concentration were generally higher in groups given a higher dose (20 mg) or with a lower age/weight, but also in patients identified as poor metabolizers on cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype. Most patients who had any upper gastrointestinal symptoms at baseline were asymptomatic at the end of the study. Thirty-three patients (66%) reported ≥1 adverse events, including three patients who reported serious adverse events not judged to be causally related to esomeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Oral esomeprazole, at 10 mg or 20 mg once daily, had a similar safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile in Japanese pediatric patients to that previously seen in adults and Caucasian children.