Choosing Periodontology for Specialty Specialization: Perspective of Dental Undergraduate Students.

BACKGROUND: The attitudes of dental students to study a particular specialty of dentistry in post-graduation are of great importance as these facilitate workforce planning in the dental sector. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitude of dental students towards choosing periodontology as their future career and to explore demographic variables that affect their choice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey based on a questionnaire was conducted, including students of the third and fourth years and interns of the dental college. Twenty-seven questions, graded on a Likert scale (5-point) were included in the questionnaire, and the responses were categorised via three attitudes: negative (score 0-21), neutral (score 22-44) and positive (score 45-64). The Chi-square test for proportions was used to examine the differences between groups. RESULTS: Among 114 participants, 53 (46.5%) were males and 61 (53.5%) were females. One-third of the respondents had a positive attitude towards selecting periodontology as their future career, and the majority had a neutral perspective, with a few students having a negative attitude (20.2%). Out of the total, 34.2% of respondents had a positive attitude, and 45.6% showed a neutral attitude or perspective. CONCLUSION: Efforts should be intensified, and undergraduate (UG) students should be motivated by broadening the scope of the field in the UG curriculum by the dental council so that the students show considerable interest in pursuing the field as their future career.

Motivations, attitudes for choosing dental profession and preferred dental specialties amongst Turkish dental students.

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the influential factors for choosing dentistry, their thoughts about the profession, their expectations for the future and their thoughts about the specialisation of dental students from all grades in the School of Dentistry, Marmara University. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Socio-demographic information, influential factors the choice of profession, thoughts and expectations about dentistry, and thoughts about the specialisation were evaluated in the questionnaire that included different question types in four separate sections. Chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between categorical variables, and multiple linear regression was performed to examine the combined effects of variables that influence the always dream of becoming a dentist. RESULTS: 462 of the 471 participants from all grades who agreed to participate in the study completed the questionnaire with a response rate of 98.1%. It was seen that the students' clinical experience made differences in almost half of their motivational sources for choosing dentistry and their views on future opinions and expectations (p < .05). In addition to clinical experience, gender also made a statistically significant differences in almost all answers in the students' opinions about specialisation (p < .05). CONCLUSION: From the results of the study, the majority of Turkish dental students were self-motivated compared to familial and environmental factors for choosing dentistry as a career. The career motivations of them seemed to be associated with the socioeconomic aspects of dentistry, whereas the perceptions regarding the future of dentistry seemed to be associated with the need for postgraduate education.

Clinical decision-making in complex endodontic cases between postgraduate students across dental specialties at a UK dental school: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment decisions for a heavily restored endodontically treated tooth vary amongst clinicians owing to multitude of factors. This phenomenon not only often poses dilemmas to clinicians of different clinical backgrounds, but also exerts a degree of treatment difficulty to the treating clinician. Previous studies indicated that specialty training and clinical experience significantly impacted clinical decision-making process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Master of Science postgraduate students in endodontics, prosthodontics, periodontics, oral surgery and implantology participated in a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. The dental specialties were further categorised into restorative and surgical dentistry. A multiple-choice questionnaire with three clinical cases was distributed to the students. Data were analysed for trends using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was a 44% response rate; the majority of respondents were from restorative dentistry specialties. Cases 1 and 2 were rated as moderate to high difficulty, and Case 3 was predominantly rated as high difficulty with procedure predictability being the main factor affecting their clinical decision-making in three cases. Endodontic retreatment was selected as the preferred treatment in Cases 1 and 2 and periradicular surgery in Case 3. The students were fairly confident in managing Cases 1 and 2, but not in Case 3. Referral patterns were consistent in Cases 1 and 2 with endodontists being the first choice of referral except for Case 3 where 48% preferred to refer to oral surgeons and 35% choosing endodontists. Some indication of differences between specialties were noted throughout. Years in practice appeared to be related to the importance of predictability in Case 3 only. CONCLUSION: Considerable inter-clinician variability was noted whereby specialty postgraduate training impacted on clinical decision-making. Overall, procedural predictability, technical difficulty, risk of damage to the tooth and patient preference were the most highly ranked factors affecting clinical decision-making. Evidence-based treatment guidelines and dental curricula should be reviewed to enhance inter-clinician agreement in clinical decision-making, ultimately improving patient care.

Life satisfaction of Taiwanese dental graduates received residencies in the U.S.: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Each year, more than 200 international dental graduates start U.S. specialty trainings to become specialists. It is unknown if their life satisfaction is associated with any dental career-related factor before residencies (e.g. dental school class rank, research experience, or private practice experience) and after residencies (e.g. staying in the U.S., teaching status, workplace, or board certification). This cross-sectional study aimed to identify these potential factors by surveying Taiwanese dental graduates who pursued U.S. residencies. METHODS: Life satisfaction was measured with a structured questionnaire, Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), which includes five statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Online surveys were sent out to 290 Taiwanese dental graduates who were known to pursue U.S. residencies. T-test, one way analysis of variance, and multivariable adjusted generalized linear model (GLM) were used to assess the differences of mean SWLS scores from different variables. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 158 dentists. Mean SWLS score of 125 specialists was higher (p = 0.0007) than the score of 33 residents. For the 125 specialists, multivariable adjusted GLM demonstrated better life satisfaction was positively associated with multiple independent factors, such as having research experience, being ranked in the top 26 ~ 50% of the class in dental school, starting U.S. residency within 4 years after dental school, starting residency before year 1996, and specializing in endodontics (vs. periodontics). Life satisfaction was not associated with any factors after residency (e.g. staying in the U.S. afterwards, teaching status, or workplace), but better mean life satisfaction score was significantly associated with being American specialty board certified (p < 0.001) for the specialists in the 26 ~ 75% of their class in dental school. For the 33 residents, better mean life satisfaction score was associated with better dental school class rank in both bivariate (p = 0.020) and multivariable adjusted GLM (p = 0.004) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The life satisfaction of Taiwanese dental graduates pursuing U.S. residencies might be associated with some professional factors, such as research experience, dental school class rank, residency timing, specialty type, and specialty board certification. We hope our results may provide some objective information on making career decisions for international dental graduates/students who are preparing for U.S. residency.

Panorama Atual dos Programas de Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia para Cirurgiões-Dentistas do Brasil / Current Portrait of Multiprofessional Residency Programs in Oncology for Dentist in Brazil / Panorama Actual de los Programas de Residencia Multiprofesional en Oncología para Cirujanos-Dentistas en Brasil

Introdução: Os Programas de Residência Multiprofissional constituem-se uma estratégia fundamental para a ampliação da capacidade para o enfrentamento do câncer. Objetivo: Analisar o panorama atual dos Programas de Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia para cirurgiões- -dentistas no Brasil, bem como o número de profissionais egressos desses cursos, a partir de dados informados pelo Ministério da Educação (MEC). Método: Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, exploratório. A primeira fase consistiu na solicitação à Equipe Técnica da Residência Multiprofissional do MEC do Brasil da relação de todos os Programas de Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia que incluíssem a categoria profissional da odontologia. Adicionalmente, foi realizada busca manual. Na segunda fase, realizaram-se contato por e-mail e busca pelos editais disponíveis na Internet dos casos em que não houve resposta. Os dados investigados foram a presença de Programa ativo, inclusão da categoria profissional da odontologia, número de vagas ofertadas e de egressos para cada ano entre 2010 e 2020, que foram analisados descritivamente. Resultados:Foram identificados 13 Programas de Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia para cirurgiões-dentistas, distribuídos em 12 centros, situados em dez cidades de oito Estados brasileiros, sobretudo, na Região Sudeste. Seis Programas foram implementados em 2010, seis em 2016 e um em 2020. No cenário Brasileiro, entre 2010 e 2020, foram ofertadas 216 vagas e formados pouco mais de 114 profissionais especializados nessa área. Conclusão: Ressalta-se a necessidade do incremento de centros, Programas e vagas para Residências Multiprofissionais em Oncologia para cirurgiões-dentistas no Brasil, bem como do reconhecimento da Oncologia como uma especialidade odontológica.

Introduction: Multiprofessional Residency programs represent a fundamental strategy to increase the capacity of cancer management. Objective: To analyze the current portrait of Multiprofessional Residency programs in oncology for dental surgeons in Brazil, as well as the number of professionals graduating from these courses, based on data reported by the Ministry of Education (MEC). Method: Quantitative, exploratory study. The first phase consisted in requesting to the Brazilian MEC Technical Team of Multiprofessional Residency to list all the Multiprofessional Residency Programs in Oncology that included the professional category of dentistry. Additionally, a manual search was performed. In the second phase, a contact was made by e-mail and a search in the available Internet public notices of the unanswered cases was conducted. The data searched and analyzed descriptively consisted in the existence of an active program, inclusion of the professional dentistry category, number of vacancies offered and graduates for each year between 2010 and 2020. Results: Thirteen Multiprofessional Residency programs in oncology for dental surgeons were identified, distributed in 12 centers, located in ten cities in eigtht Brazilian states, mainly in the Southeast region. Six programs were implemented in 2010, six in 2016 and one in 2020. In the Brazilian scenario, between 2010 and 2020, a total of 216 vacancies were offered and just over 114 professionals specialized in this area completed the academic formation. Conclusion: It is emphasized the necessity to increase the quantity of centers, programs and vacancies for Multiprofessional Residencies in Oncology for dental surgeons in Brazil, as well as the recognition of oncology as a dental specialty

Introducción: Los Programas de Residencia Multiprofesional constituyen una estrategia fundamental para expandir la capacidad de enfrentar el cáncer. Objetivo:Analizar el panorama actual de los Programas de Residencia Multiprofesional en oncología para cirujanos-dentistas en Brasil, así como el número de profesionales que concluyeron estos cursos, con base en datos reportados por el Ministerio de Educación (MEC). Método: Este es un estudio cuantitativo exploratorio. La primera fase consistió en pedirle al Equipo Técnico de Residencia Multiprofesional del MEC del Brasil que enumerara todos los Programas de Residencia Multiprofesional en Oncología que incluían la categoría profesional de odontología. Además, se realizó una búsqueda manual. En la segunda fase, se contactó por correo electrónico y se buscaron los avisos disponibles en Internet de los casos en que no hubo respuesta. Los datos investigados fueron la presencia de Programa activo, inclusión de la categoría profesional odontología, número de vacantes ofrecidas y número de graduados para cada año entre 2010 y 2020, que fueron analizados descriptivamente. Resultados: Se identificaron 13 Programas de residencia multiprofesional en oncología para cirujanos dentistas, distribuidos en 12 centros, ubicados en diez ciudades de ocho estados brasileños, principalmente en la región Sudeste. Se implementaron seis Programas en 2010, seis en 2016 y uno en 2020. En el escenario brasileño, entre 2010 y 2020, se ofrecieron 216 vacantes y se capacitaron poco más de 114 profesionales especializados en esta área. Conclusión: Se enfatiza la necesidad de aumentar el número de centros, Programas y vacantes para residencias multiprofesionales en oncología para dentistas en Brasil, así como del reconocimiento de la oncología como especialidad odontológica

Current status of oral and maxillofacial radiology in West Africa.

BACKGROUND: Oral and maxillofacial radiology became the ninth dental specialty recognized by the American Dental Association (ADA) in 1999. This came about following the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen in 1895 and, 14 days later, the application of X-rays to making dental radiographs by Otto Walkhoff. The purpose of this narrative study was to review the evolution of oral and maxillofacial radiology as a dental specialty in the USA and its recognition as a program of training by the West African College of Surgeons. METHODS: This study was conceptualized as a narrative review of the literature focusing on the history and development of oral and maxillofacial radiology in the USA. It builds a synthesis that describes the recognition of oral and maxillofacial radiology as a specialty of dentistry in West Africa, UK, Japan, and Australia. RESULTS: The main finding was that oral and maxillofacial radiology became the ninth specialty recognized by the American Dental Association, ADA, in October 13, 1999. On March 20, 2014, the West African College of Surgeons recognized this specialty and granted accreditation for postgraduate training. In the UK, Japan, and Australia, the postgraduate education in oral and maxillofacial radiology has two patterns, namely professional training and academic training. CONCLUSIONS: The primary goal of the postgraduate training curriculum is to train radiologists who are competent to deliver care to patients in any clinical setting, including a dental school, hospital radiology practice, or private practice.

[Standardized training system for oral and maxillofacial radiology specialist in the United States].

Oral and maxillofacial radiology (OMR) in the United States is one of the nine dental specialties recognized by the American Dental Association (ADA). It has a nearly 100-year history of development and has also established a complete set of specialist training system. Staffing, base facilities, financial status, timing of training courses, contents, plans, and goals to be achieved are all clearly defined. All training centers need to undergo regular assessments every seven years with the ADA's Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA). After graduation, the specialist graduates can be engaged in the clinical teaching and scientific research of radiological diagnosis in universities or general hospitals. They also have the option to open their own business by setting up imaging diagnostic centers or being specialized in tele-radiology to provide imaging diagnosis or consultation report to clinicians in other disciplines, or even assisting in the development of treatment planning for dental implants and orthodontic procedures. Of course, stomatology and OMR education systems are different in China and the United States due to different national conditions. Although the experience in the United States cannot be completely copied, many concepts, standards and goals of OMR specialty training there have been practiced and improved for a long period of time and are worth learning by the Chinese OMR counterparts or relevant agencies.

Trends in Generalist and Specialty Advanced Dental Education and Practice, 2005-06 to 2015-16 and Beyond.

This article reviews the data on advanced dental education for the past decade and explores what advanced dental education might look like in the years leading up to 2040, including how its graduates will address the oral health needs of the population. The authors based these projections on published data about advanced dental education collected by the American Dental Association and other organizations. Nevertheless, a certain degree of speculation was involved. The article presents current data and trends in advanced dental education, environmental factors impacting advanced dental education, and lessons drawn from other areas of health care that support the potential scenarios that are described. This article was written as part of the project "Advancing Dental Education in the 21st Century."

New UK graduates' knowledge of training and service provision within restorative dentistry - a survey.

Objective To assess new UK graduates' knowledge of training and service provision within restorative dentistry.Design A national descriptive cross-sectional survey.Subjects and methods An online survey assessing clinicians' knowledge of restorative dentistry, who had graduated within the last four years in the UK, was distributed across the UK via postgraduate dental deaneries. One-hundred responses were accepted as a sample of a potential population of 4,000.Main outcome measure How well respondents understood the service provision and training aspects of the specialty of restorative dentistry.Results The responses were received from graduates from a variety of dental schools across the UK. Of those respondents, 41 reported receiving career guidance within restorative dentistry. 45 new graduates were confident in their understanding of the specialty, while 53 were confident in the differences between restorative dentistry and monospecialty training. The respondents appeared unaware regarding treatment priorities within restorative dentistry departments. Most respondents felt that receiving teaching on restorative dentistry as a specialty and career pathway would be beneficial.Conclusion The results suggest that new graduates may benefit from clarification regarding the specialty of restorative dentistry, however, caution must be taken due to the limitations of the study.

Finally in Italy the School of Specialisation in Paediatric Dentistry!

After over two decades of discussions, promises and indecisions, the year 2016 marked the birth of the School of Specialisation in Paediatric Dentistry, which is now a reality. The importance of dental post-graduate specialisation schools has been debated since the Degree Course in Dentistry was established. Previously, in Italy only two dental branches - Oral Surgery and Orthodontics - had obtained the recognition that a School of Specialisation entails. Today, with specific training and the newly- established hyper-specialisation in Paediatric Dentistry, the future of the profession is brighter than ever. This will allow dental professionals to provide the best cure to our young patients but it especially marks and recognises the importance of prevention in general. Having established a Specialty School in Paediatric Dentistry is also important to keep the pace with the other European countries where this postgraduate course has been already offered for many years. In my opinion, training professionals with a solid specialisation based both on cultural insights and hands-on clinical activities translates into the possibility of making true prevention. The ultimate goal of paediatric dentists, as well as paediatricians, is certainly to treat young patients but also and above all to accompany them toward an adulthood possibly free of pathologies. With an eye to a future where Paediatric Dentistry will be at the core of dental and orthodontic prevention, I wish great success to all the many specialisation schools established within the Italian Universities.

Using a situational judgement test for selection into dental core training: a preliminary analysis.

Objective and setting This paper describes the evaluation of a pilot situational judgement test (SJT) for selection into UK Dental Core Training (DCT). The SJT's psychometric properties, group differences based on gender and ethnicity, and candidate reactions were assessed.Methods The SJT targets four non-academic attributes important for success in DCT. Data were collected alongside live selection processes from five Health Education England local teams in the UK (N = 386). Candidates completed the pilot SJT and an evaluation questionnaire to examine their reactions to the test.Results SJT scores were relatively normally distributed and showed acceptable levels of internal reliability (α = 0.68). Difficulty level and partial correlations between scenarios and SJT total score were in the expected ranges (64.61% to 90.03% and r = 0.06 to 0.41, respectively). No group differences were found for gender, and group differences between White and BME candidates were minimal. Most candidates perceived the SJT as relevant to the target role, appropriate and fair.Conclusions This study demonstrated the potential suitability of an SJT for use in DCT selection. Future research should replicate these preliminary findings in other cohorts, and assess the predictive validity of the SJT for predicting key training and practice-based outcomes.

Consequences of experience and specialist training on the fabrication of implant-supported prostheses: A survey.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fabricating fixed restorations on implants requires that dentists stay up-to-date with the scientific publications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire containing 29 questions was sent to dentists, members of the Israeli Society of Prosthodontics, and university faculty members. Differences were evaluated using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests and Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests for questions enquiring into the frequency of use of certain methods (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 155 questionnaires were completed by 84 general dental practitioners and 71 specialists and residents. Statistical differences (P<.05) were found in the course of the fabrication of the implant-supported prostheses in the diagnostic waxing, trial restoration, and impression-making processes. Trial restorations were often used by residents and specialists before starting an esthetic restoration. Diagnostic waxing was used when treating patients with complex esthetic needs, mainly by prosthodontists (P=.019). A custom tray for impression making was used more by residents and specialists than by general dental practitioners (P<.001). The open tray technique for impression making of single or up to 3 implants was performed mainly by residents, specialists, and general dental practitioners with professional experience of fewer than 15 years. General dental practitioners used primarily plastic or metal trays for impression making. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly, impression techniques and the use of custom open trays, diagnostic waxing, and trial restorations were performed by residents, specialists, and dentists with fewer than 15 years of experience.

Training in surgery of the temporomandibular joint: the UK trainers' perspective.

Surgery of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is increasingly recognised as a subspecialist area of interest within our specialty and many procedures such as arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and replacement of the TMJ are becoming increasingly centralised and restricted to certain regions. We previously made a national survey of trainees and have sought to augment this with a survey of trainers to find out the nature of practice and patterns of referral nationally. We have also examined the consultants' expectations of competent final-year trainees. To do this we made an electronic survey of Fellows of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) and received 82 responses (26%). Many just provided simple treatments within their clinical practice, only 16 did arthroscopy, and 14 alloplastic joint replacements. From those who answered the question, only 10 would allow a competent final-year trainee to do an alloplastic joint replacement under supervision. Referrals for TMJ subspecialist care were predominantly made to the West Midlands, East Midlands, and North West, with 24 respondents stating they would either refer open TMJ surgery centrally within or outside the region. Centralisation of services means that training opportunities in surgery of the TMJ are reduced, and restricted to only a few regions. Other models of training may need to be introduced such as simulation, "taster" sessions, and brief clinical attachments. For the budding subspecialist, however, a dedicated Fellowship may become essential to ensure adequate exposure before starting independent consultant practice.

Identifying Multilevel Barriers to Tobacco Intervention in Postdoctoral Dental Education.

The aims of this mixed-methods study were to assess tobacco treatment behaviors among residents and faculty in dental specialty postdoctoral programs and to explore factors in training and practice related to tobacco treatment education. Surveys and focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of participants at three postdoctoral residency programs in New York City. Surveys assessed tobacco cessation training and behaviors. Focus groups explored barriers to implementing tobacco cessation treatment in educational settings. Data were collected between May and December 2013. Among the 160 faculty and residents identified as potentially eligible for the study, 60 were invited by program directors to participate, and 50 subsequently completed the survey and participated in a focus group (response rate of 31.3%). Survey results indicated high levels of asking patients about tobacco use and advising patients to quit. In contrast, specific tobacco cessation assistance and follow-up care occurred less frequently. There were statistically significant differences in tobacco cessation intervention across the specialties surveyed, but not between residents and faculty. Focus group comments were grouped into three broad areas: clinician factors, organizational support, and structural and contextual factors. Focus group results indicated that participants experienced significant organizational and structural barriers to learning about and providing tobacco treatment. Participants from each specialty indicated that multi-level barriers impeded their provision of evidence-based tobacco cessation interventions in postdoctoral educational settings. They suggested that didactic education should be reinforced by organizational- and systems-level changes to facilitate comprehensive tobacco education and effective cessation treatment in future dental practice.

Special care dentistry: how prepared are we?

AIM: To assess and evaluate the confidence of the undergraduate dental team in Irish dental schools regarding their training in the field of special care dentistry (SCD). METHOD: A questionnaire was distributed amongst the undergraduate dental teams within Cork University Dental School and Hospital (CUDSH) and Dublin Dental University Hospital (DDUH). The data were analysed to assess for differences between the median responses of the various groups. RESULTS: A total of 139 students participated in the study; 82 from DDUH (59 dental science students, seven dental hygiene students and 16 dental nursing students) and 57 from CUDSH (43 dental science students and 14 dental hygiene students). Twenty-two per cent (n = 30) of respondents agreed that their training had been sufficient in providing treatment or assistance for patients requiring SCD. Seventy-five per cent agreed that more emphasis should be placed on clinical training in SCD (n = 76). Thirty-one per cent of students anticipated a high level of confidence in treating patients requiring SCD upon graduation (n = 43), with dental science students feeling the least prepared amongst the dental team. CONCLUSION: Confidence levels of the undergraduate dental team were low with regard to SCD. The existing hands-on clinical training in SCD was deemed insufficient by the respondents. Students believed more emphasis should be placed on SCD training in the undergraduate curriculum.