Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.240
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Fertil Steril ; 117(2): 421-430, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980431

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify changes in current practice patterns, salaries, and satisfaction by gender and by years in practice among board-certified reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) subspecialists in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional web-based survey including 37 questions conducted by the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were total compensation and practice patterns compared by gender and the type of practice. The secondary outcomes included demographics, the number of in vitro fertilization cycles, surgeries performed, and the morale of survey respondents. RESULT(S): There were 370 respondents (48.4% women and 51.4% men). Compared with a similar survey conducted 6 years earlier, a 27% increase in the number of female respondents was observed in this survey. There was a marginally significant trend toward lower compensation for female than male REI subspecialists (17% lower, $472,807 vs. $571,969). The gap was seen for responders with ≥10 years' experience, which is also when there was the largest gap between private and academic practice (mean $820,997 vs, $391,600). Most (77%) felt positively about the current state of the reproductive endocrinology field, and >90% would choose the subspecialty again. CONCLUSION(S): There has been a substantial increase in the number of recent female REI subspecialists showing less disparity in compensation, and the gap appears to be closing. There is an increasing gap in compensation between private and academic practices with ≥5 years of experience. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility remains a high morale specialty.


Assuntos
Endocrinologistas/tendências , Endocrinologia/tendências , Equidade de Gênero/tendências , Infertilidade/terapia , Médicas/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Medicina Reprodutiva/tendências , Sexismo/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Escolha da Profissão , Estudos Transversais , Endocrinologistas/economia , Endocrinologia/economia , Feminino , Equidade de Gênero/economia , Humanos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Infertilidade/fisiopatologia , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicas/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Medicina Reprodutiva/economia , Salários e Benefícios/tendências , Sexismo/economia , Especialização/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Mulheres Trabalhadoras
2.
Recurso na Internet em Inglês, Espanhol, Português | LIS - Localizador de Informação em Saúde | ID: lis-48201

RESUMO

Nas Américas, uma rede de laboratórios de 22 países contribui para a detecção de variantes do SARS-CoV-2. Até agora, 37 países e territórios confirmaram a presença de uma ou mais das quatro variantes de preocupação. Monitorá-las é a chave para detectar quaisquer mudanças incomuns ou inesperadas que possam afetar as medidas de controle, incluindo as vacinas


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecções por Coronavirus , Vigilância em Desastres , Vírus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Especialização/tendências
5.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1652021 04 15.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914422

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends and developments in the total duration of training medical specialists in the Netherlands, including their ages upon completion of the components of medical education: undergraduate medical program, waiting time and further post-graduate specialist training. DESIGN: Population cohort study. METHOD: From the combined data from Statistics Netherlands and the Registration Committee for Medical Specialists for the period 1986 to 2018 relevant populations were selected and training trajectories were mapped. The population size was 40,604 individuals for undergraduate medical programs, 41,885 for the duration of post-graduate specialist training, 31,915 for the waiting periods and 21666 for the total duration of the trajectory from the start of medical school until registration as a specialist. RESULTS: The median duration of undergraduate medical programs was 7.1 years, which is longer than the nominal duration and this remained unchanged over the observation period. The average waiting time between graduating medical school and postgraduate specialist training has increased from 2010 onwards to 3.7 years in 2018. The average duration of postgraduate specialist training is increasing. The average age at graduation of medical school fell by 1.7 years to 26.1. The average age at the start of post-graduate specialist training decreased, as did the average age at registration as a specialist. CONCLUSION: The total duration of training of medical specialists is stable. Changes such as "dedicated transition year" and flexible arrangements for postgraduate training have had no discernible influence on the total duration of medical training. Because the average age at start of postgraduate specialist training has decreased, medical specialists are on average younger upon registration.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Internato e Residência/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Currículo , Educação Médica/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 36(4): 296-303, 2021 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755525

RESUMO

Spurred by the coronavirus disease pandemic and shortage of eye care providers, telemedicine is transforming the way ophthalmologists care for their patients. Video conferencing, ophthalmic imaging, hybrid visits, intraocular inflammation quantification, and portable technology are evolving areas that may allow more uveitis patients to be evaluated via telemedicine. Despite these promising disruptive technologies, there remain significant technological limitations, legal barriers, variable insurance coverage for virtual visits, and lack of clinical trials for uveitis specialists to embrace telemedicine.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Oftalmologia/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Especialização/tendências , Telemedicina/métodos , Uveíte/diagnóstico , Uveíte/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Humanos
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 70: 27-35, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32442595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple specialties offer vascular interventional care, creating potential competition for referrals and procedures. At the same time, patient/consumer ratings have become more impactful for physicians who perform vascular procedures. We hypothesized that there are differences in online ratings based on specialty. METHODS: We used official program lists from the Association for Graduate Medical Education to identify institutions with training programs in integrated vascular surgery (VS), integrated interventional radiology (IR), and interventional cardiology (IC). Faculty providers were identified in each specialty at these institutions. A standardized search was performed to collect online ratings from Vitals.com, Healthgrades.com, and Google.com as well as from online demographics. Between specialty differences were analyzed using chi-squared and analysis of variance tests as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with review volume and star rating. RESULTS: A total of 1,330 providers (n = 454 VS, n = 451 IR, n = 425 IC) were identified across 47 institutions in 27 states. VS (55.5%-69.4%) and IC (63.8%-71.1%) providers were significantly more likely to have reviews than IR (28.6%-48.8%) providers across all online platforms (P < 0.001 for all websites). Across all platforms, IC providers were rated significantly higher than VS and IR providers. Multivariable regression showed that provider specialty and additional time in practice were associated with higher review volume. In addition to specialty, review volume was associated with star rating as those physicians with more reviews tended to have a higher rating. CONCLUSIONS: On average, vascular surgeons have more reviews and are more highly rated than interventional radiologists but tend to have fewer reviews and lower ratings than interventional cardiologists. VS providers may benefit from encouraging patients to file online reviews, especially in competitive markets.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendências , Cardiologistas/tendências , Internet , Satisfação do Paciente , Radiografia Intervencionista/tendências , Radiologistas/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Ferramenta de Busca/tendências , Mídias Sociais/tendências
10.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 73(2): 199-206, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32475025

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Puerto Rico, to describe disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) dispensing patterns by prescriber specialty, and to illustrate the impact of RA case definition on the estimated prevalence. METHODS: This study estimated the prevalence of RA in Puerto Rico during 2016 among Medicaid and Medicaid-Medicare dually eligible beneficiaries of the Mi Salud health care plan, a federally funded health insurance program. DMARD dispensing and cost patterns were described and stratified by provider specialty. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of RA case definition on estimated prevalence. RESULTS: The prevalence of RA in 2016 was estimated to be 2 cases per 1,000 beneficiaries, with 3 per 1,000 beneficiaries among females, 4.5 times that of males. In total, 44% of beneficiaries received conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) only, 32% received biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) only, and 24% received a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs. Rheumatologists and a combination of specialties accounted for the highest median number of dispensed DMARDs, with 14 each. A sensitivity analysis revealed that when RA cases with ≥3 medical claims were restricted to having ≥1 DMARD claim, the estimated prevalence changed from 6 to 3 cases per 1,000 beneficiaries. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RA in Puerto Rico in this study is lower than reported in the mainland US, possibly due to more stringent criteria to define RA. DMARD dispensing and cost patterns are similar to those found in other studies. Claims algorithms that identify RA have higher validity when pharmacy data is included.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Benefícios do Seguro , Medicaid , Medicare , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antirreumáticos/economia , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/economia , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Medicamentos , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Definição da Elegibilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Prevalência , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Reumatologistas/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(5): 981-986, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030879

RESUMO

Shortly after its inception, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology recognized that no data described the composition and faculty activities of "academic generalist divisions." Consequently, in 2018, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology appointed a presidential task force and conducted the current surveys of chairs and division directors and key informant interviews to understand the composition and faculty activities in divisions of academic specialists in departments of obstetrics and gynecology and propose criteria for excellence in each mission area to guide development of divisions. In 2014, with Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology's guidance, these divisions were referred to as academic specialists divisions and the faculty within as academic specialists to emphasize that they provide specialized women's health care in academic settings. The divisions comprised approximately 30% of departments' full-time faculty (median 12). In 27% of the departments, these divisions contributed more than half of departmental revenue, and 49% contributed 26-50%. Nearly 90% of divisions provided a sizeable proportion of the department's total teaching efforts. Compensation relied more on clinical productivity than on seniority, quality, academic contributions, or academic rank. Subsequently, five performance domains were identified to help divisions define divisional excellence: clinical, education, research, service & advocacy, and academic environment. Furthermore, excellent divisions were characterized as those with outstanding clinicians and educators who emphasize scholarly productivity. Although academic specialists contribute significantly to their departments' financial, clinical, and educational productivity, many have limited opportunities for scholarly activity. Achieving divisional excellence likely will depend on the ability to recruit and retain faculty with career expectations that align with the division's prioritized performance domains.


Assuntos
Docentes de Medicina/tendências , Ginecologia/tendências , Obstetrícia/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Comitês Consultivos , Docentes de Medicina/organização & administração , Feminino , Ginecologia/educação , Ginecologia/organização & administração , Humanos , Obstetrícia/educação , Obstetrícia/organização & administração , Gravidez , Sociedades Médicas
12.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 51(4): 517-525, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32950221

RESUMO

Early sports specialization (ESS) is a relatively new trend that has led to many youth athletes to focus on only 1 sport at an increasingly young age. Although parents and coaches perceive that this will improve their athlete's chances of success at the collegiate and professional levels, studies have shown the opposite. ESS leads to increased injury risk, higher rates of burnout, and lower lifelong sports participation without increasing elite achievement. Throwing athletes are particularly vulnerable to these overuse injuries of the shoulder and elbow, which have been shown to correlate directly to the number of throws and innings played.


Assuntos
Especialização/tendências , Esportes Juvenis/tendências , Humanos , Extremidade Superior , Esportes Juvenis/lesões
13.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(9): 1449-1452, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32868018

RESUMO

In this article, the updated status of interventional radiology (IR) in China is reported and compared vs that a decade ago based on a poll carried out in 2017 in Jiangsu Province, where the economy and overall health level are among the best of the 31 provinces in China. All 98 polled centers responded, and 56 IR departments (57%) had become independent departments separate from the radiology department; 74 (76%) had inpatient wards. In 2017, there were 538 interventional radiologists performing IR procedures in Jiangsu Province, with a total of 69,277 procedures performed, with interventional oncologic procedures accounting for the largest proportion (58%).


Assuntos
Radiografia Intervencionista/tendências , Radiologistas/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia/tendências , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , China , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Especialização/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
14.
Neurology ; 95(15): 686-692, 2020 10 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and current status of training and certification in clinical neurophysiology (CNP); to explore the impact of the newer subspecialties in sleep medicine, neuromuscular medicine, and epilepsy; and to obtain information about aspects of practice in the subspecialty. METHODS: Information about training programs and certification was obtained from the records of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, and diplomates were surveyed about their CNP practice activities and attitudes toward certification/recertification. RESULTS: In the years since the first examination was administered, a robust number of CNP training programs developed, but recently, there has been a decrease in the number of programs and fellows, although the number of programs and fellows in the subspecialties of epilepsy, neuromuscular medicine, and sleep medicine has increased. A diplomate survey indicated that most respondents devoted significant practice time to CNP procedures, especially to EEGs and EMGs. Although more diplomates performed EEGs than EMGs, a substantial portion performed both. Most diplomates were planning to or had maintained certification in CNP. CONCLUSION: Over 3,000 neurologists, child neurologists, and psychiatrists have obtained certification in CNP, and the majority are participating in recertification. Although the newer and overlapping subspecialties of epilepsy, neuromuscular medicine, and sleep medicine may be having a negative impact on CNP, it continues to have a relatively large number of programs and attracts a relatively large number of fellows.


Assuntos
Neurologia/educação , Neurofisiologia/educação , Psiquiatria/educação , Especialização/tendências , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Certificação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neurologia/economia , Papel Profissional , Estados Unidos
16.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(12): e015569, 2020 06 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32482113

RESUMO

Maternal mortality in the United States is the highest among all developed nations, partly because of the increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease in pregnancy and beyond. There is growing recognition that specialists involved in caring for obstetric patients with cardiovascular disease need training in the new discipline of cardio-obstetrics. Training can include integrated formal cardio-obstetrics curricula in general cardiovascular disease training programs, and developing and disseminating joint cardiac and obstetric societal guidelines. Other efforts to help strengthen the cardio-obstetric field include increased collaborations and advocacy efforts between stakeholder organizations, development of US-based registries, and widespread establishment of multidisciplinary pregnancy heart teams. In this review, we present the current challenges in creating a cardio-obstetrics community, present the growing need for education and training of cardiovascular disease practitioners skilled in the care of obstetric patients, and identify potential solutions and future efforts to improve cardiovascular care of this high-risk patient population.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/educação , Cardiologia , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Obstetrícia , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/terapia , Cardiologistas/tendências , Cardiologia/tendências , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Mortalidade Materna , Obstetrícia/tendências , Segurança do Paciente , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/mortalidade , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Especialização/tendências
17.
J Med Vasc ; 45(3): 107-113, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32402424

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 15% of patients treated by anticoagulant for a venous thromboembolic event are also treated with antiplatelet therapy; and this association increases the risk of bleeding. The aim of this survey was to evaluate general practitioner's management of antiplatelet therapy at the initiation of anticoagulation, and at six months compared to French vascular physicians' management. METHODS: A questionnaire including 4 clinical situations was established and the physicians were asked to detail antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy management. From September 2017 to December 2017, an e-mail invitation and a reminder were sent to members of the departmental councils who participated; 218 questionnaires were obtained. RESULTS: Overall, 91.3% of physicians considered that there was an increased risk of bleeding when antiplatelet therapy is associated with anticoagulation. After initiating anticoagulation, 67% of respondents continued antiplatelet therapy, while 30% stopped. Three strategies were used: 49.0% of physicians maintained concomitant antiplatelet therapy with full-dose anticoagulant, both at anticoagulant initiation and at 6 months; 23% of physicians stopped antiplatelet therapy and prescribed full-dose anticoagulant at initiation and at 6 months; 12.4% of physicians prescribed antiplatelet therapy associated with reduced-dose anticoagulation at 6 months regardless of the strategy at anticoagulant initiation. CONCLUSION: One third of general practitioners stopped antiplatelet therapy at the initiation of an anticoagulation for a venous thromboembolic event. Prospective controlled trials are needed to clarify the best way to treat these patients in this situation.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Clínicos Gerais/tendências , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Especialização/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia
18.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(6): 961-966, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376176

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate utilization trends in percutaneous embolization among radiologists and nonradiologist providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service databases for 2005-2016 were used to evaluate percutaneous embolization codes. Six codes describing embolization procedures were reviewed. Physician providers were grouped as radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, other surgeons, and all others. RESULTS: The total volume of Medicare percutaneous embolization procedures increased from 20,262 in 2005 to 45,478 in 2016 (+125%). Radiologists performed 13,872 procedures in 2005 (68% of total volume) and 33,254 in 2016 (73% of total volume), a 140% increase in volume. While other specialists also increased the number of cases performed from 2005 to 2016, radiologists strongly predominated, performing 87% of arterial and 30% of venous procedures in 2016, more than any other single specialty. In 2014 and 2015, a sharp increase in venous embolization cases performed by nonradiologists preceded a sharp decrease in 2016, likely the result of complicated billing codes for venous procedures. Radiologists maintained a steady upward trend in the number of cases they performed during those years. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of percutaneous embolization procedures performed in the Medicare population increased from 2005 to 2016, reflecting a trend toward minimally invasive intervention. In 2016, radiologists performed nearly 10 times more arterial embolization procedures than the second highest specialty and more venous embolization procedures than any other single specialty.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/tendências , Neoplasias/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Radiologistas/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiologistas/tendências , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part B/tendências , Nefrologistas/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
19.
Hum Resour Health ; 18(1): 38, 2020 05 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the long-lasting economic stagnation, the popularity of medical school has dramatically increased among pre-medical students in Japan. This is primarily due to the belief that medicine is generally a recession-proof career. As a result, pre-medical students today who want to enter medical school have to pass a more rigorous entrance examination than that in the 1980s. This paper explores the association between the selectivity of medical school admissions and graduates' later career choices. METHODS: A unique continuous measure of the selectivity of medical school admissions from 1980 to 2017, which is defined as the deviation value of medical schools, was merged with cross-sectional data of 122 990 physicians aged 35 to 55 years. The association between the deviation value of medical schools and various measures of physicians' career choices was explored by logistic and ordinary least square regression models. Graduates from medical schools in which the deviation value was less than 55 were compared with those from more competitive medical schools, after controlling for fixed effects for the medical school attended by binary variables. RESULTS: From 1980 to 2017, the average deviation value increased from 58.3 to 66.3, indicating a large increase in admission selectivity. Empirical results suggest that increasing selectivity of a medical school is associated with graduates having a higher probability of choosing a career in an acute hospital as well as having a lower probability of opening their own clinic and choosing a career in primary health care. Graduating from a highly competitive medical school (i.e., deviation value of more than 65) significantly increases the probability of working at typical acute hospitals such as so-called 7:1 hospitals (OR 1.665 2, 95%CI 1.444 0-1.920 4) and decreases the probability of working at primary care facilities (OR 0.602 6, 95%CI 0.441 2-0.823 0). It is also associated with graduates having a higher probability of becoming medical board certified (OR 1.294 6, 95%CI 1.108 8-1.511 4). CONCLUSION: Overall, this paper concludes that increased selectivity of medical school admissions predicts a higher quality of physicians in their own specialty, but at the same time, it is associated with a lower supply of physicians who go into primary care.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Critérios de Admissão Escolar/tendências , Faculdades de Medicina/tendências , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Licenciamento em Medicina/normas , Licenciamento em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Setor Privado , Setor Público , Fatores Sexuais , Especialização/tendências
20.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 8(6): 912-918, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32414676

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can be complicated by post-thrombotic syndrome, which is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare costs. The Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) was the largest and most controversial randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome after acute DVT. This study aimed to evaluate clinicians' opinion on the ATTRACT trial and its impact on clinical practice. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 10 core multiple choice items and a maximum of five follow-up open-ended questions was delivered to vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, hematologists, and interventional cardiologists affiliated with 10 international societies between April 23 and July 1, 2019. Clinicians' views on the main limitations of the ATTRACT trial, its impact on patient selection for thrombolysis and the need for a new trial were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 15,650 contacted clinicians, 451 (3%) completed the survey, with 74% vascular surgeons, 24% interventional radiologists, 2% hematologists, and 0.2% interventional cardiologists. The majority of respondents (79%) were aware of the results of the ATTRACT trial before completing the survey and routinely performed pharmacomechanical CDT (PCDT) in their centers (70%). Only 20% of clinicians considered ATTRACT to be a well-designed and well-performed trial. The inclusion of femoropopliteal DVT was reported as the main limitation of the trial by 55% of respondents. Despite half of the participating clinicians reporting no change in their clinical practice, equal number of clinicians (14%) were encouraged and discouraged from treating iliofemoral DVT. More than one-half of the respondents thought that the use of PCDT would be defensible in a court of law despite the increased risk of bleeding reported in the study. Nearly two-thirds of participating clinicians recommended performing a trial limited to iliofemoral DVT, with a follow-up period of 5 years, quality of life as the primary outcome measure, and standardization of thrombolysis protocol across the trial sites. CONCLUSIONS: ATTRACT failed to provide the long-awaited indisputable evidence on the use of PCDT. Surveyed clinicians were aware of the limitations of this trial and the need for further evidence on the subject.


Assuntos
Médicos/tendências , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Trombectomia/tendências , Terapia Trombolítica/tendências , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cardiologistas/tendências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hematologia/tendências , Humanos , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/etiologia , Radiologistas/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Especialização/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/complicações , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA