[Efficacy of stent placement in treatment of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula and relevant factors of fistula closure].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of stent placement in the treatment of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula (MTEF) and the factors affecting the closure of the fistula. Methods: Clinical, pathological, laboratory, and imaging data of 288 patients with MTEF admitted to Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University from 2015 to 2021were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 208 males; the age was (63.6±10.5) years. A total of 94 patients received conservative treatment (conservative group), and 194 in the stent group (170 cases with esophageal stents and 24 cases with tracheal stents). Patients were followed-up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate the effect of stent implantation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze factors affecting fistula closure. Results: Age, fistula size, leukocyte count before treatment, and fistula location were significantly different between the conservative group and the stent group (P<0.05). The Karnofsky functional status (KPS) score before treatment in the conservative group was lower than the stent group, (45.1±1.0) vs (51.8±0.7) scores, respectively (P<0.001). After 2 weeks and 1 month of treatment, improvement in KPS scores was significantly better in the stent group than in the conservative group (P<0.05). At 1 month, the pulmonary infection rate in the stent group was 33.5% (58/173), significantly lower than that in the conservative group [77.0% (47/61); P<0.001]. Among the 288 patients, the fistula was closed in 196 patients and unclosed in 92 patients. Fistula size (OR=3.429, 95%CI: 1.623-7.829, P=0.001), leukocyte count before treatment (OR=1.160, 95%CI: 1.027-1.317, P=0.018), KPS score before treatment (OR=0.898, 95%CI: 0.848-0.945, P<0.001) and the treatment method (conservative treatment as reference, esophageal stent OR=0.010, 95%CI: 0.004-0.030, P<0.001; tracheal stent OR=0.003, 95%CI: 0.000-0.042, P<0.001) were factors affecting fistula closure. In the 170 patients in the esophageal stent group, early complications (≤24 h) occurred in 71 patients, and late (>24 h) complications occurred in 11 patients. While in the 24 patients in the tracheal stent group, 9 had early complications and 2 had late complications. Conclusions: Stent placement is an effective treatment for MTEF compared to conservative treatment. Stent treatment, small fistula size, low pre-treatment leukocyte count, and high pre-treatment KPS score are beneficial to fistula closure.

Successful non-operative management of atrioesophageal fistula after combined therapy of catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation: A case report.

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but devastating complication of radiofrequency ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with high mortality rates. Whereas most cases of AEF are treated by emergency surgical interventions, we report a case of paroxysmal AF with AEF after combined therapy of catheter ablation and percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), which was treated successfuly without major surgery or esophageal stenting. He was presented 18 days after the procedure, suffering chest pain, fever, and a transient loss of consciousness. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest disclosed a small accumulation of air in the region of the left atrium adjacent to the esophagus, suggesting AEF. Supported by early aggressive antibiotic therapy, pericardial drainage and a fasting state with adequate parenteral nutrition, resulted in improvement of his condition with no recurrence of symptoms. Subsequent chest CT scans confirmed disappearance of the leaked air and the patient was discharged home 28 days after admission with no neurological compromise. Early detection, rapid treatment and constant awareness of potential fatal consequences are prerequisites for successful treatment of this complication and prevention of fatal outcome.

Esophago-aortic fistula of esophageal cancer after chemotherapy, proton therapy and salvage photodynamic therapy: a rescued case.

We describe a case of esophageal cancer after proton therapy that resulted in an esophagoaortic fistula after photodynamic therapy (PDT). A 49-year-old woman with esophageal cancer (cT1bN0M0, cStage I) underwent chemotherapy (5-FU and cisplatin) and radiotherapy (proton therapy to the cancer lesion after X-ray radiotherapy to the regional lymph nodes). Despite a complete response of the primary tumor, local recurrence was observed 10 months after treatment. PDT was performed as a salvage treatment. She was transported to the emergency department in a state of hemorrhagic shock due to hematemesis 50 days after PDT. We diagnosed an esophagoaortic fistula caused by esophageal perforation, and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and thoracic endovascular aortic repair were performed. The patient was successfully rescued after three surgeries (esophagectomy, extraesophageal fistula, aortic vascular replacement, and gastrointestinal reconstruction). In addition to X-ray radiotherapy before photodynamic therapy, proton therapy in combination with the vascular shutdown effects of PDT may have caused ischemia of the esophagus, resulting in an esophagoaortic fistula. When performing PDT, the type of radiation therapy and the location of the lesion should be examined to assess the risk of penetration or perforation.

Tubercular Bronchoesophageal Fistula in an Adolescent Girl.

Bronchoesophageal fistula is a rare complication of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children. An adolescent girl who was diagnosed of tubercular mediastinal lymphadenopathy with associated bronchoesophageal fistula at presentation, is reported here. This 16-y-old girl presented with high-grade fever, cough, decreased appetite, weight loss for 3 mo, and breathlessness for 10 d. Chest radiograph revealed hilar lymphadenopathy with bilateral pleural effusion. GA GeneXpert was positive for mycobacterium and rifampicin sensitivity. Despite antitubercular therapy cough persisted and there was a history of dry cough with food intake, especially more on liquids. Bronchoscopy and CECT chest confirmed bronchoesophageal fistula in the right main bronchus just below the carina. Child continued on tube feeding and antitubercular therapy. After completion of intensive phase, child improved with resolution of clinical symptoms and scarring of tract on repeat bronchoscopy. It is concluded that in children with combination of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and persistent cough following intake of food needs careful evaluation for trachea/bronchoesophageal fistula.

Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy for Definitive Management of an Esophagobronchial Fistula.

PURPOSE: Endoluminal vacuum (EVAC) therapy has gained popularity as a minimally invasive option for contained esophageal leaks. EVAC therapy may be useful for esophagogastric anastomotic leak fistulizing to the airway. DESCRIPTION: This report describes EVAC therapy of an esophagobronchial fistula with video depicting the procedure, including technical tips. Video and photographic evidence of progression and ultimate resolution is included. EVALUATION: Sponge exchanges were completed every 3 to 4 days. EVAC therapy was administered through a transnasal approach. In the presented case, a total of 11 exchanges over 6 weeks were required. EVAC sponge placement was transitioned from intracavitary to endoluminal for the final 4 treatments. All but 4 exchanges were able to be completed at the bedside in a monitored setting with sedation. CONCLUSIONS: An esophageal leak that has fistulized to a main airway is a rare and challenging clinical problem. Definitive EVAC therapy for esophageal anastomotic leak with esophagobronchial fistula is a feasible option in selected cases.

Use of double-layered covered esophageal stents in post-surgical esophageal leaks and esophageal perforation: Our experience. / Uso de prótesis esofágicas cubiertas de doble malla en fístulas esofágicas postquirúrgicas y perforaciones esofágicas: experiencia en nuestro centro.

INTRODUCTION: The use of esophageal stents for the endoscopic management of esophageal leaks and perforations has become a usual procedure. One of its limitations is its high migration rate. To solve this incovenience, the double-layered covered esophageal stents have become an option. OBJECTIVES: To analyse our daily practice according to the usage of double-layered covered esophageal metal stents (DLCEMS) (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) among patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation. METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive and unicentric study, with inclusion of patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation, from November 2010 until October 2018. The main aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DLCEMS, in terms of primary success and technical success. The secondary aim is to evaluate their (the DLCEMS) safety profile. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were firstly included. Among those, 8 were excluded due to mortality not related to the procedure. Following stent placement, technical success was reached in 100% of the cases, and primary success, in 75% (n=17). Among the complications, stent migration was present in 21.7% of the patients (n=5), in whom the incident was solved by endoscopic means. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, DLCEMS represent an alternative for esophageal leak and perforation management, with a high success rate in leak and perforation resolutions and low complication rate, in contrast to the published data. The whole number of migrations were corrected by endoscopic replacement, without the need of a new stent or surgery.

Management of Nonmalignant Tracheo- and Bronchoesophageal Fistula after Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Tracheo- or bronchoesophageal fistula (TBF) occurring after esophagectomy represent a rare but devastating complication. Management remains challenging and controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of different treatment approaches and to propose recommendations for the management of TBF. METHODS: From 2008 to 2018, 15 patients were treated because of TBF and were analyzed with respect to fistula appearance, treatment strategy (stenting, endoscopic vacuum therapy and/or surgical reintervention) and outcome. RESULTS: In each case, the fistula was small, located close to the tracheal bifurcation and associated simultaneously (n = 6, 40%) or metachronously (n = 9, 60%) with an anastomotic leakage. Latter was covered by esophageal stents in six patients which in turn resulted in occurrence of TBF at a later time in five patients. Management of TBF included conservative therapy (n = 3), stenting (n = 6), or suturing (n = 6). Ten patients underwent rethoracotomy. Treatment failure was observed in eight patients (53%). In all patients, treatment was accompanied by progressive sepsis. On the contrary, all seven patients with successful defect closure remained in good general condition. CONCLUSION: Fistula appearance was similar in all patients. Implementation of esophageal stents cannot be recommended because of possibility of TBF at a later time point. Surgery is usually required and should preferably be performed when the patient's condition has been optimized at a single-stage repair. Esophageal diversion can only be recommended in patients with persisting mediastinitis. The key element for successful treatment of TBF, however, is control over sepsis; otherwise, outcome of TBF is devastating.

Carotid-Esophageal Fistula Treated By Endovascular Approach.

The carotid-esophageal fistula is a rare and serious complication of the metallic esophageal prosthesis. A high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and treatment, decreasing the morbidity and mortality rate of this severe complication. We report a case of a 4-year-old boy presenting severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a carotid-esophageal fistula, secondary to deployment of an esophageal metallic prosthesis for treatment of a recurrent stenosis. The carotid pseudo-aneurism was successfully treated with stents and coils. Although endovascular treatment is a safe and effective option, arterial stenting in children needs further studies with long-term follow-up.

Cardiac tamponade in a long-term survival esophageal cancer patient after esophageal bypass and chemoradiotherapy: a case report.

Esophageal bypass surgery is an effective treatment strategy for esophageal cancer with esophago-tracheobronchial fistula. We herein report an esophageal cancer patient with esophago-pulmonary fistula who achieved a long-term survival but died suddenly because of cardiac tamponade. A 70-year-old male patient with esophago-pulmonary fistula due to esophageal tumor invasion underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy as the initial treatment. Esophageal bypass surgery followed by additional chemotherapy was performed, and the patient survived for a long time. Four years and six months later, a small abscess in an esophago-pulmonary fistula was visualized on computed tomography. One month later, he suffered suddenly severe dyspnea and died. An autopsy suggested that the direct cause of death had been cardiac tamponade due to atrio-pericardial fistula. Definitive therapy for esophageal cancer with fistula after esophageal bypass is an effective treatment, but close special attention must be paid to the possibility of irradiation-related late toxicity.

Spontaneous Aortoesophageal Fistula And Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm - A Case Report On Combined Aortic And Esophageal Prosrhesis Palliative Treatment.

Aortoesophageal fistulas are uncommon, dreadful vascular events, most frequently found in the setting of thoracic aorta aneurysms. Patients usually present with thoracic pain, dysphagia and sentinel hematemesis - the Chiari triad - followed by life threatening hematemesis. Emergent open surgery with debridement of necrotic tissue and in situ aortic graft repair is currently the best strategy. However, in patients which cannot withstand surgery, endovascular repair is currently gaining acceptance as a palliative treatment or as a bridge to surgery. We present a case of a 55-year-old female with a past of heavy alcohol abuse and a previously unknown massive aortic aneurysm, who presented to the emergency department complai- ning of acute dysphagia and epigastric pain. An abdominal ultrasound revealed left pleural effusion and suspected clots in the pleural space. A thoracic CTA was promptly done, where a spontaneous ruptured aortic aneurysm with aortoesophageal fistula was discovered. The team, fearing open surgery due to poor cardiac function, opted for a thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The aortoesophageal fistula dissected the esophageal wall in all of its thickness without rupture into the lumen. This was complicated with esophageal ischemia, aneurysmal sac infection and mediastinitis. Because the patient was in shock, in order to help control the infection, an esophageal prosthesis was placed, followed by proximal esophagostomy, distal esophageal closure and gastrostomy. Six months after initial presentation, the patient died at the emergency room, shortly after reentering with massive hematemesis and hypovolemic shock of undetermined origin.

Delayed esophagopleural fistula after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices: A case report.

RATIONALE: Esophagopleural fistula (EPF) is a rare critical life-threatening condition that features high misdiagnosis rate. Although various surgical and conservative techniques have been developed for the treatment of EPF, the mortality rate of EPF remains high. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 81-year-old man with hepatic cirrhosis caused by schistosomiasis was admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. DIAGNOSES: Upper endoscopy revealed bleeding large esophageal varices, and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) was performed. Two weeks after the EIS was performed, the patient developed pyrexia, left-sided pleuritic chest pain. Air and pleural effusion were showed in the left pleural cavity by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and a linear fistulous communication was noticed from the distal esophagus. These findings were consistent with hepatic cirrhosis, esophageal varices, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and esophagopleural fistula. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was intensively treated with endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent (covered-SEMS) implantation and comprehensive treatments (including thoracic closed drainage, antibiotics, nasojejunal nutrition, and antacids). OUTCOMES: The patient was completely cured without recurrence during a 6 months of follow-up by comprehensive conservative treatments. LESSONS: This case indicates that pleural effusion with food residue is a specific finding in EPF. Thorax CT exhibited high sensitivity for the diagnosis of EPF. Endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent implantation and comprehensive conservative treatments may be preferable for the severe liver disease with EPF.

When less is more: a daring conservative approach to postpneumonectomy oesophago-pleural fistula.

Oesophago-pleural fistula is an uncommon complication after pneumonectomy, usually related to high morbidity and mortality. Due to its rarity and heterogeneous clinical presentation, its diagnosis and management are challenging issues. Here, we report the case of a patient with a history of pneumonectomy for a tracheal tumour, who developed an asymptomatic oesophago-pleural fistula 7 years after primary surgery. In consideration of the patient's good clinical status and after verifying the preservation of respiratory and digestive functions, a bold conservative approach was adopted. Five-year follow-up computed tomography did not disclose any sign of recurrence of disease and showed a stable, chronic fistula.

Performance status is a predictive factor of dysphagia improvement after esophageal stenting in patients with malignant esophageal strictures and fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Malignant strictures and fistulas of the esophagus adversely affect quality of life (QOL) and prognosis, and stenting is considered a useful therapy for improving QOL. However, the predictive factors for improving dysphagia after esophageal stenting are unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate patients with esophageal malignant strictures and fistulas who underwent stenting and investigate the factors for dysphagia improvement after stenting. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with malignant esophageal strictures and fistulas were treated with a self-expandable metallic stent over a period of 5 years and 6 months. The main outcome was improvement in the dysphagia score. We divided the patients into dysphagia improved and non-improved groups after esophageal stenting. Sex, age, cause of stenting (primary or non-primary esophageal cancers), prior treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation, type of esophageal stents (covered or non-covered), dysphagia score before stenting, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of the patients before stenting were evaluated. Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Factors with a P value < 0.2, age, and sex were included and evaluated using a multiple logistic regression model. Statistical significance was defined as a P value < 0.05. RESULTS: Stent placements succeeded in all cases without fatal complications. The dysphagia score improved in 15 patients. Twelve patients had primary lesions, and another 12 had non-primary lesions. The reasons for stenting were malignant strictures in 20 patients and esophageal fistulas in 4 patients. There were no significant differences in any factors, except PS before stenting (P = 0.003), between the improved and non-improved groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis results demonstrated that improvement in the dysphagia score was significantly associated with PS before stenting (adjusted odds ratio = 0.035, 95% CI 0.003-0.44, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal stenting is safe and effective in patients with malignant esophageal strictures and fistulas. PS is an independent factor for dysphagia improvement after stenting.

Risk Factors for Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal fistula is a critical and fatal complication of esophageal cancer. The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the risk factors for esophageal perforation in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: Data from the PubMed and Embase databases were retrieved for clinical research published between 1990 and 2018. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were eligible for the meta-analysis. In these articles, over 35 risk factors for esophageal fistula formation were described and 17 risk factors were analyzed. Significant differences in the odds of developing an esophageal perforation were found with regard to age (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.08-5.03, p = 0.001), ulcerative type (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.43-5.16, p = 0.002), histology (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.14-15.12, p = 0.03), T stage (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.44-4.91, p = 0.002), short-term response (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.06-4.62, p = 0.03), chemotherapy regimen (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.38-5.68, p = 0.005), and stenosis (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03-3.89, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: An age of <60-65 years, ulcerative type, squamous cell cancer, T4 stage, incomplete response, fluorouracil-based regimen, and stenosis were associated with an increased risk of esophageal fistula during or after radiotherapy. However, further, large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish the validity of this associ-ation.

Risk Factors for the Development of Esophagorespiratory Fistula in Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The development of esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) in esophageal cancer (EC) is a devastating complication, leading to poor survival rates and low quality of life. Goal of this study was to identify risk factors leading to fistula formation in esophageal cancer. METHODS: We identified 47 patients with malignant ERF formation in EC in a period of 10 years. Clinical characteristics were compared by univariable analysis to 47 randomly selected patients with EC, but without ERF. A case-control study was conducted for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and ERF matching in a 1:2 fashion for primary tumor localization. RESULTS: Identifiable risk factors in EC patients were histology of SCC (P-value < 0.001), former or current smoking status (P = 0.002) and primary tumor localization in the proximal esophagus (P < 0.001). The "hot spot" for ERF formation was tumor growth 20-25cm distal to dental arch. An additional risk factor in SCC patients was age. Patients with ERF formation in SCC were younger than patients without ERF (median 63 vs. 67 years, P = 0.02). No difference in the rate of fistula formation was seen between esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiation, but the latter developed ERF earlier in the course of the disease (237 vs. 596.5 days, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with proximal SCC of the esophagus and a smoking history, as well as young patients with SCC should be closely monitored for ERF formation.