RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immunological factors are a major cause of kidney allograft loss. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have improved short-term kidney allograft survival; however, they in turn contribute to long-term kidney allograft loss from chronic CNI nephrotoxicity. Tolerance induction in transplantation can avoid the long-term adverse effects of immunosuppressive medications. This review aims to critically discuss recent efforts in inducing transplantation tolerance. RECENT FINDINGS: Tolerance induction mediated by chimerism has shown some promise in minimizing or even complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatments in kidney allograft recipients. There has been a number of approaches as varied as the number of centres conducting these trials. However, they can be grouped into those mediated by transient microchimerism and those facilitated by more stable macro or full donor chimerism. The success rates in terms of long-term drug-free graft survival has been limited in microchimerism-mediated tolerance induction approaches. Mixed macrochimerism of less than 50% donor may be unstable with mostly the recipient's native immune system overpowering the donor chimeric status.Tolerance induction leading to chimerism has been limited to living donor kidney transplantation and additional long-term outcomes are required. Furthermore, immune monitoring after tolerance induction has faced a limitation in studying due to a lack of sufficient study participants and appropriate study controls. SUMMARY: Tolerance induction is one of several strategies used to prolong kidney allograft survival, but it has not been routinely utilized in clinical practice. However, future applications from the trials to clinical practice remain limited to living donor kidney transplantation. Once further data regarding tolerance inductions exist and practicality becomes widely accepted, tolerance induction may shift the paradigm in the field of kidney transplantation to achieve the best possible outcome of 'One Organ for Life'.
Assuntos
Quimerismo , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Tolerância Imunológica , Transplante de Rim , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Aloenxertos/imunologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Previsões , Facilitação Imunológica de Enxerto/métodos , Facilitação Imunológica de Enxerto/tendências , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Humanos , Tolerância Imunológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Tolerância Imunológica/imunologia , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/imunologia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Rim/imunologia , Rim/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Doadores Vivos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Tolerância ao Transplante/efeitos dos fármacos , Tolerância ao Transplante/imunologiaRESUMO
Islet transplantation is a treatment modality for diabetes mellitus that can maintain insulin levels within a physiologically appropriate range. However, wider clinical application is limited by insufficient donor numbers and a need for lifelong immunosuppression. Despite various clinical and preclinical trials, there is no single standard immunosuppressive regimen that can suppress acute and chronic immune reactions with lower toxicity to grafted islets. One of the strategies for overcoming lifelong immunosuppression is the incorporation of encapsulation technology, which can provide a physical immune barrier by keeping out high molecular weight immune system components, while still allowing low molecular weight oxygen, insulin and nutrients to pass through. Encapsulated islet transplantation approaches that have been studied so far include macroencapsulation, microencapsulation, conformal coating and nanoencapsulation. Herein we will review the basic concepts of islet encapsulation technique, earlier works to recent progress related to clinical studies and corporate investigations on encapsulated islet transplantation.