Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
World J Surg Oncol ; 18(1): 82, 2020 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357934

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of the primary surgery (PS) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the initial treatment for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stages III-IV HPSCC from four tertiary referral centers consecutively enrolled from 2003 to 2012; of them, 213 (32.6%) and 439 (67.4%) had received PS and CCRT as their primary treatments, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. RESULTS: In patients undergoing PS and CCRT, OS rates were 45.0% and 33.1% (p < 0.001), respectively, and DFS rates were 36.2% and 28.9% (p = 0.003), respectively. In subgroup analysis, in patients with stage IVA HPSCC, PS was associated with higher OS rate (p = 0.002), particularly in those with T4 or N2 classification (p = 0.021 and 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that stage IVA HPSCC, stage IVB HPSCC, and CCRT were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS rate (p = 0.004, < 0.001, and 0.014, respectively). Furthermore, in patients with stage IVA HPSCC aged ≥ 65 years and with N2 classification, CCRT was significantly associated with lower OS rates than was PS (p = 0.027 and 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HPSCC, PS was significantly associated with better prognosis than CCRT. PS could be a favorable primary treatment modality for the management of patients with stage IVA HPSCC, particularly those aged ≥ 65 years and with T4 and N2 classification.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/terapia , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/patologia , Hipofaringe/patologia , Hipofaringe/cirurgia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia
2.
J Robot Surg ; 13(2): 301-307, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30128930

RESUMO

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) provides improved access to head and neck subsites resulting in well-validated functional and oncological outcomes, but access to and cost of robotic platforms can limit their use. Evidence suggests TORS is increasingly being adopted globally, but there is a paucity of data on the adoption and diffusion of TORS in Australia and New Zealand. A cross-sectional analysis was performed. An online survey was distributed to otolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons through three different Australian and New Zealand specialty membership databases. A 5-point Likert scale based on a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model was incorporated to assess barriers and facilitators to adoption. 77 respondents completed the survey. 43.6% of head and neck surgeons had performed TORS. The most common cases were lateral oropharyngectomy (35.9%), base of tongue resection (33.3%), tongue base mucosectomy (28.2%), supraglottic laryngectomy (15.4%) and TORS for obstructive sleep apnoea (12.8%). Perceived barriers to adoption were high costs, access to and availability of the robotic platform and limited training opportunities. This study provides evidence of adoption of TORS in Australia and New Zealand; however, there is a perception that significant barriers to adoption persist. Results from this study may help guide decisions on how we train and license surgeons in the era of this technology.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Otorrinolaringologistas , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Laringectomia/métodos , Laringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Faringectomia/métodos , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Língua/cirurgia
3.
Oral Oncol ; 86: 75-80, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30409323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) have similar survival to patients treated with definitive RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) registry, we identified patients with newly diagnosed clinical T1-T2, N0-N2b OPSCC between 2010 and 2014. A multivariable logistic regression was utilized to determine the association between chemotherapy use and primary treatment modality (TORS vs definitive RT). Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to estimate overall survival. Propensity score matching was utilized to address selection bias. RESULTS: We identified 17,150 patients, of which 14,470 (84.4%) received primary RT and 2,680 (15.6%) underwent TORS. The median follow-up for the cohort was 31.4 months. Propensity score matching demonstrated similar 5-year OS for patients treated with either definitive RT or TORS (81% vs 84%, log rank p = 0.10). There was no difference in survival outcomes by treatment selection (TORS or definitive RT) in either HPV positive or HPV negative subtypes. Patients treated with TORS were less likely to receive chemotherapy compared to patients treated with definitive RT and this was also demonstrated in a propensity matched analysis (OR: 0.09, 95%CI 0.078-0.12, p < 0.001). Only 68.4% of TORS treated patients underwent adjuvant RT, compared to 100% of patients in the primary RT cohort (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients with OPSCC, TORS results in similar OS outcomes and is associated with decreased chemotherapy and RT use compared to definitive RT. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of TORS in a select subgroup of OPSCC patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidade , Faringectomia/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 70(5): 628-638, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28325565

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of cancers that arise from or invade the hypopharynx presents major reconstructive challenges. Reconstructive failure exposes the airway and neck vessels to digestive contents. METHODS: We performed a national N = near-all analysis of the administrative dataset to identify pharyngolaryngectomies in England between 2002 and 2012. Information about morbidity, pharyngeal closure method and post-operative complications was derived. RESULTS: There were 1589 predominantly male (78%) patients whose mean age at surgery was 62 years. The commonest morbidities were hypertension (24%) and ischemic heart disease (11%). For 232 (15%) patients, pharyngolaryngectomy was performed during an emergency admission. The pharynx was closed primarily in 551 patients, with skin or muscle free or pedicled flaps in 755 patients and with jejunum and gastric pull-up in 123 and 160 patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality rate was 6% and was significantly higher in the gastric pull-up group (11%). Reconstructive failure had an odds ratio of 6.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-16.1] for in-hospital death. The five-year survival was 57% and age, morbidities, emergency surgery, gastric pull-up, major acute cardiovascular events, renal failure and reconstructive failure independently worsened prognosis. Patients who underwent pharyngeal reconstruction with radial forearm or anterolateral thigh flaps had lower mortality rates than patients who had jejunum flap reconstruction (hazard ratio = 1.50 [95% CI 1.03-2.19]) or gastric pull-up (hazard ratio = 1.92 [95% CI 1.32-2.80]). CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngolaryngectomy carries a high degree of risk of morbidity and mortality. Reconstructive failure worsens short- and long-term prognosis, and the use of cutaneous free flaps appears to improve survival.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Laringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiologia , Laringectomia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Faringectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Eur Spine J ; 25(12): 3894-3901, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27566300

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To highlight cervical spondylodiscitis as an infrequent complication following an invasive procedure on the neopharynx in patients previously treated with circumferential pharyngolaryngectomy with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cervical spondylodiscitis after circumferential pharyngolaryngectomy between 2001 and 2013 were retrospectively studied using a questionnaire sent to the French head and neck tumour study group. Medical history; tumour management; clinical symptoms; biological, microbiological and imaging results; and management of the infection were collected for each patient. RESULTS: Six men aged 51-66 years were diagnosed with spondylodiscitis on average 5.6 years after circumferential pharyngolaryngectomy, and a mean 2 months following an invasive procedure on the neopharynx (oesophageal dilatation, phonatory prosthesis insertion). The patients presented with cervical pain and increased CRP level. MRI showed epidural abscess and communication between the pharynx and vertebral bodies in most cases. Microbiological samples yielded bacteria from the pharynx flora. Infection was managed using antibiotics adjusted according to the culture results and spinal immobilisation for duration of 6-12 weeks. No surgical treatment was required. During follow-up, no patient experienced recurrence or residual disability. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spondylodiscitis is a rare but potentially severe complication following an invasive procedure on the neopharynx after circumferential pharyngolaryngectomy. Therefore, the onset of nonspecific symptoms should not be overlooked, and MRI must be performed if infection is suspected. Microbiological confirmation is critical in optimising treatment, which should be aggressive, even if overall prognosis seems to be good.


Assuntos
Discite/etiologia , Laringectomia , Faringectomia , Faringe/cirurgia , Espondilose/etiologia , Idoso , Humanos , Laringectomia/efeitos adversos , Laringectomia/métodos , Laringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Faringectomia/efeitos adversos , Faringectomia/métodos , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(2): 202-7, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24071365

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the role of age in the occurrence of postoperative complications after total laryngopharyngectomy (TLP) or total laryngectomy (TL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study including all patients who underwent TLP or TL in our institution between January 2005 and December 2010. The impact of age (greater than 65 years), history of cancer treatments and comorbidities on early postoperative course was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Out of the 97 patients operated on, 21% had cancer of the hypopharynx and 79% of the larynx. Mean age at surgery was 63 years (41-90 years). 44% of patients were more than or equal to 65 years of age. Regarding local complications, only age (p = 0.004) had a statistically significant influence in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 21.4, p = 0.0001) and alcohol consumption (OR 0.18, p = 0.04) were significant. Factors influencing the occurrence of general complications were, in univariate analysis: age >65 years (p = 0.003), type of surgery (p = 0.042), the presence of cardiovascular history (p = 0.47) and ASA score >2 (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, only age >65 years remained significant (OR 3.31, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the importance of preoperative oncogeriatric evaluation from the age of 65 years to optimize surgical management.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Laringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Laryngoscope ; 121(4): 746-52, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21433017

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of surgeon and hospital case volume and other related variables on short-term outcomes after surgery for oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS: The Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission database was queried for oropharyngeal cancer surgical case volumes from 1990 to 2009. Multivariable regression models were used to identify significant associations between surgeon and hospital case volume, as well as independent variables predictive of in-hospital death, postoperative wound complications, length of hospitalization, and hospital-related cost of care. RESULTS: Overall, 1,534 oropharyngeal cancer surgeries were performed during the study period. Complete financial data was available for 1,482 oropharyngeal cancer surgeries, performed by 233 surgeons at 36 hospitals. The only independently significant factors associated with the risk of in-hospital death were an APR-DRG mortality risk score of 4 (odds ratio [OR] = 14.0, P < .001) and total glossectomy (OR = 5.6, P = .020). Wound fistula or dehiscence was associated with an increased mortality risk score (OR = 5.9, P < .001), total glossectomy (OR = 6.9, P < .001), mandibulectomy (OR = 3.4, P < .001), and flap reconstruction (OR = 2.1, P = .038). Increased mortality risk score, total glossectomy, pharyngectomy, mandibulectomy, flap reconstruction, neck dissection, and Black race were associated with an increased length of stay and hospital-related costs. After controlling for all other variables, a statistically significant negative correlation was observed between surgery at a high-volume hospital and length of hospitalization and hospital-related costs. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for other factors, high-volume hospital care is associated with a shorter length of hospitalization and lower hospital-related cost of care for oropharyngeal cancer surgery.


Assuntos
Hospitais Universitários/economia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/economia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Glossectomia/economia , Glossectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Esvaziamento Cervical/economia , Esvaziamento Cervical/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Faringectomia/economia , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Laryngoscope ; 121(1): 77-84, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21125633

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Positive volume-outcome relationships exist for diseases treated with technically complex surgery. Contemporary patterns of laryngeal cancer surgery by hospital and surgeon volume are poorly defined. METHODS: The Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission database was queried for hospital and surgeon laryngeal cancer surgical case volumes from 1990 to 2009. RESULTS: Overall, 1,981 laryngeal cancer surgeries were performed by 288 surgeons at 41 hospitals. Cases performed by high-volume surgeons increased from 19% in 1990 to 1999 to 35% in 2000 to 2009 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.0, P<.001), whereas cases performed at high-volume hospitals increased from 33% to 39% (OR = 2.0, P<.001). High-volume surgeons were more likely to perform total laryngectomy (OR = 1.7, P = .001) and neck dissection (OR = 1.7, P = .002). High-volume hospitals were significantly associated with total laryngectomy (OR = 2.0, P = .003), neck dissection (OR = 1.8, P = .038), flap reconstruction (OR = 5.1, P = .021), prior radiation (OR = 3.0, P = .031), and increased mortality risk scores (OR = 3.2, P = .006). After controlling for other variables, laryngeal cancer surgery in 2000 to 2009 was associated with increased access to high-volume surgeons (OR = 1.9, P<.001) and high-volume hospitals (OR = 1.3, P = .040), a decrease in partial and total laryngectomy procedures (OR = 0.2, P<.001), an increase in neck dissection (OR = 2.2, P< 0.001), an increase in prior radiation (OR = 3.0, P<.001), increased case complexity scores (OR = 5.7, P<.001), and an increase in wound fistula or dehiscence (OR = 2.0, P = .015) compared with 1990 to 1999. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of laryngeal cancer surgery patients treated by high-volume surgeons and hospitals increased significantly in 2000 to 2009 compared with 1990 to 1999, with a decrease in laryngectomy procedures and an increase in wound complications. These findings may be due to changing trends in primary management of laryngeal cancer.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Laringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Faringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA