Optimization of individualized faricimab dosing for patients with diabetic macular edema: Protocol for the SWAN open-label, single-arm clinical trial.

PURPOSE: In patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) from YOSEMITE/RHINE, dual angiopoietin-2/vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) inhibition with faricimab resulted in visual/anatomic improvements with extended dosing. The SWAN trial (jRCTs031230213) will assess the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab during the treatment maintenance phase in patients with DME using a treat-and-extend (T&E)-based regimen adapted to clinical practice and the characteristics of patients achieving extended dosing intervals. METHODS: SWAN is a 2-year, open-label, single-arm, interventional, multicenter trial enrolling adults with center-involving DME. All patients will receive three initial faricimab 6.0 mg doses every 4 weeks (Q4W). From week 12 onwards, in patients without active DME, dosing intervals will be extended in 8-week increments up to Q24W. In contrast, patients with active DME (central subfield thickness [CST] >325 µm and intraretinal fluid [IRF] or subretinal fluid [SRF] resulting in vision loss/disease aggravation) will receive a dose within a day and the dosing interval will be shortened by 4 weeks to a minimum of Q8W relative to the previous dosing interval. Recruitment commenced in August 2023 across a planned 16 sites in Japan. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at 1 year (averaged over weeks 52, 56, and 60). Key secondary endpoints include: change from baseline in BCVA, CST, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores over time; proportion of patients with BCVA (decimal visual acuity) ≥0.5, ≥0.7, ≥1.0, or ≤0.1; proportion of patients with absence of DME, and IRF and/or SRF over time. Safety endpoints include incidence/severity of ocular/nonocular adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The SWAN trial is expected to provide evidence to support individualized faricimab dosing regimens, with the potential to reduce the burden of frequent treatments on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems.

Serial intravitreal injections in age-related macular degeneration patients from the dry eye disease perspective: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects of serial intravitreal injections (IVI) on the ocular surface and meibomian glands in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: Patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent injections for unilateral nAMD were included. Untreated fellow eyes served as the control group. All participants followed a pre-IVI asepsis protocol with povidone-iodine (PI). Ocular surface diseases index (OSDI) questionnaire scores, first and average non-invasive tear break-up time (fNITBUT and avgNITBUT), Schirmer-1 test results, corneal staining score (according to Oxford scale), meibomian gland (MG) loss rates of lower and upper eyelids were recorded four weeks after the last IVI. RESULTS: Forty-two nAMD patients with a mean age of 63.3 ± 19.4 were included in the study. The mean OSDI score was 20.3 and the median of IVI number was 9 (6-22). There were no statistically significant difference between treated and untreated fellow eyes regarding fNITBUT (5.6 vs. 4.5, p = 0.872), avgNITBUT (6.2 vs. 7.2, p = 0.968), Shirmer-1 results (7 vs. 7, p = 0.854), corneal staining (0.3 vs. 0.2, p = 0.341), lower and upper MG loss rate (29.3 vs. 28.4, p = 0.162, and 27.1 vs. 26.9, p = 0.476, respectively). Only significant correlation was observed between age with lower and upper MG loss rate (r:0.396, p = 0.042, and r:0.365, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrated that serial IVI of anti-VEGF agents with PI asepsis is well tolerated by nAMD patients in terms of ocular surface, MG loss and DED measurements.

New Anti-Angiogenic Therapy for Glioblastoma With the Anti-Depressant Sertraline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anti-angiogenic therapies prolong patient survival in some malignancies but not glioblastoma. We focused on the relationship between the differentiation of glioma stem like cells (GSCs) into tumor derived endothelial cells (TDECs) and, anti-angiogenic therapy resistance. Especially we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of drug resistance of TDECs to anti-angiogenic inhibitors and identify novel anti-angiogenic drugs with clinical applications. RESULTS: The mouse GSCs, 005, were differentiated into TDECs under hypoxic conditions, and TDECs had endothelial cell characteristics independent of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. In vivo, inhibition of the VEGF pathway had no anti-tumor effect and increased the percentage of TDECs in the 005 mouse model. Novel anti-angiogenic drugs for glioblastoma were evaluated using a tube formation assay and a drug repositioning strategy with existing blood-brain barrier permeable drugs. Drug screening revealed that the antidepressant sertraline inhibited tube formation of TDECs. Sertraline was administered to differentiated TDECs in vitro and 005 mouse models in vivo to evaluate genetic changes by RNA-Seq and tumor regression effects by immunohistochemistry and MRI. Sertraline reduced Lama4 and Ang2 expressions of TDEC, which play an important role in non-VEGF-mediated angiogenesis in tumors. The combination of a VEGF receptor inhibitor axitinib, and sertraline improved survival and reduced tumor growth in the 005 mouse model. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings showed the diversity of tumor vascular endothelial cells across VEGF and non-VEGF pathways led to anti-angiogenic resistance. The combination of axitinib and sertraline can represent an effective anti-angiogenic therapy for glioblastoma with safe, low cost, and fast availability.

Role of EYP-1901 in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic eye diseases: review of Phase I/II trials.

EYP-1901 (Duravyu) has demonstrated promising outcomes in Phases I and II clinical trials for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME)/diabetic retinopathy. This innovative treatment capitalizes on the potent anti-angiogenic properties of vorolanib, an inhibitor that targets all isoforms of VEGF, effectively mitigating the pathological neovascularization and vascular permeability that underpin these retinal conditions. EYP-1901 is integrated with the Durasert drug delivery system to administer a sustained release of vorolanib directly to the posterior segment of the eye. This delivery system ensures a consistent therapeutic effect over an extended period and significantly reduces the frequency of clinical interventions required, offering a more convenient treatment regimen while maintaining patient safety.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) are eye problems that can make you lose your sight. These eye problems happen when blood vessels in the eye do not work right. Right now, people need lots of shots in their eyes to treat it. EYP-1901 (Duravyu) is a new medicine that helps people with fewer shots in their eyes. It has two parts: one that helps the medicine last longer, and another that helps stop the problem in the eye. Early tests show it works well and helps people keep their sight with fewer treatments.

Patient-Centered Economic Burden of Diabetic Macular Edema: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME), a leading cause of blindness, requires treatment with costly drugs, such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. The prolonged use of these effective but expensive drugs results in an incremental economic burden for patients with DME compared with those with diabetes mellitus (DM) without DME. However, there are no studies on the long-term patient-centered economic burden of DME after reimbursement for anti-VEGFs. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study aims to estimate the 3-year patient-centered economic burden of DME compared with DM without DME, using the Common Data Model. METHODS: We used medical data from 1,903,603 patients (2003-2020), transformed and validated using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. We defined the group with DME as patients aged >18 years with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and intravitreal anti-VEGF or steroid prescriptions. As control, we defined the group with DM without DME as patients aged >18 years with DM or diabetic retinopathy without intravitreal anti-VEGF or steroid prescriptions. Propensity score matching, performed using a regularized logistic regression with a Laplace prior, addressed selection bias. We estimated direct medical costs over 3 years categorized into total costs, reimbursement costs, nonreimbursement costs, out-of-pocket costs, and costs covered by insurance, as well as healthcare resource utilization. An exponential conditional model and a count model estimated unbiased incremental patient-centered economic burden using generalized linear models and a zero-inflation model. RESULTS: In a cohort of 454 patients with DME matched with 1640 patients with DM, the economic burden of DME was significantly higher than that of DM, with total costs over 3 years being 2.09 (95% CI 1.78-2.47) times higher. Reimbursement costs were 1.89 (95% CI 1.57-2.28) times higher in the group with DME than with the group with DM, while nonreimbursement costs were 2.54 (95% CI 2.12-3.06) times higher. Out-of-pocket costs and costs covered by insurance were also higher by a factor of 2.11 (95% CI 1.58-2.59) and a factor of 2.01 (95% CI 1.85-2.42), respectively. Patients with DME had a significantly higher number of outpatient (1.87-fold) and inpatient (1.99-fold) visits compared with those with DM (P<.001 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DME experience a heightened economic burden compared with diabetic patients without DME. The substantial and enduring economic impact observed in real-world settings underscores the need to alleviate patients' burden through preventive measures, effective management, appropriate reimbursement policies, and the development of innovative treatments. Strategies to mitigate the economic impact of DME should include proactive approaches such as expanding anti-VEGF reimbursement criteria, approving and reimbursing cost-effective drugs such as bevacizumab, advocating for proactive eye examinations, and embracing early diagnosis by ophthalmologists facilitated by cutting-edge methodologies such as artificial intelligence for patients with DM.

Prognosis and factors related to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with retinal vein occlusion and concomitant carotid artery disease.

To evaluate the prognosis and influencing factors of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in patients with concomitant carotid artery disease receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Patients diagnosed with RVO and receiving anti-VEGF treatment were included. Eye and clinical data were collected. The patients were divided into a group with concomitant carotid artery disease (Group A) and a group without concomitant carotid artery disease (Group B). The risk factors affecting the visual prognosis of RVO patients with concomitant carotid artery disease were analyzed. Among 177 eligible patients with RVO, 101 had concomitant carotid artery disease (Group A), while 76 did not (Group B). Group A had a significantly lower treatment effectiveness rate than Group B (P < 0.001). The age and platelet distribution width of Group A were significantly higher than Group B (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), external limiting membrane (ELM) disruption, and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) were significantly associated with the posttreatment visual prognosis of RVO patients with concomitant carotid artery disease(P < 0.05). RVO patients with concomitant carotid artery disease had a significantly lower treatment effectiveness rate than RVO patients without carotid artery disease. The poor baseline BCVA, DRIL, ELM disruption, and a greater RDW are risk factors for low anti-VEGF treatment efficacy among RVO patients with concomitant carotid artery disease.

Real-world visual acuity outcomes for patients with naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with aflibercept, ranibizumab, or bevacizumab in the Republic of Korea.

BACKGROUND: To compare the visual outcomes of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, in a real-world setting in Korea. METHODS: We collected data from patients who received monotherapy using one of these three anti-VEGF drugs as naïve treatment after being diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The number of injections and visual acuity (VA) outcomes of each cohort were obtained and pairwise comparisons were performed using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 254 aflibercept, 238 ranibizumab, and 282 bevacizumab treatment-naïve eyes were included. The mean VA change at 3 years for all cohorts combined was -1.8 letters, and the mean number of injections was 9.4. In the direct comparison of the three drugs, the mean change in the VA letter score was +2.0 letters for aflibercept and -11.7 letters for bevacizumab (P < 0.001). The number of aflibercept injections was significantly higher than the number of bevacizumab injections (P = 0.002). The visual outcomes for aflibercept and ranibizumab were +4.7 letters and -1.9 letters, respectively, and comparable results were obtained (P = 0.13). The VA outcomes for ranibizumab and bevacizumab were also not significantly different (P = 0.09). The numbers of injections for aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab were 10.8, 6.7, and 8.8, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the injection frequencies comparisons of aflibercept and ranibizumab and ranibizumab and bevacizumab (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the Korean clinical medical environment, which included various confounding factors, especially socioeconomic ones, the aflibercept VA outcome was significantly better than that of bevacizumab, and aflibercept injections were the most numerous. These real-world data imply that the drug effect as well as the environment in which the drug can be sufficiently used affected patient final VA scores.

Predictive value of optical coherence tomography angiography in management of diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a relatively new extension of Optical coherence tomography (OCT) that generates non-invasive, depth-resolved images of the retinal microvasculature which allows for the detection of various features of diabetic retinopathy. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to detect biomarkers that may predict an early anatomical response to the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) by means of OCTA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective interventional study was undertaken on 111 eyes of 102 naïve participants who had diabetic macular edema; enrolled patients were evaluated by taking a complete ophthalmologic history, examination and investigations by use of a pre-designed checklist involving Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. RESULTS: Regarding the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) the Mean ± SD was 0.704 ± 0.158 preoperatively and 0.305 ± 0.131 postoperatively in good responder patients; and was 0.661 ± 0.164 preoperatively and 0.54 ± 0.178 postoperatively in poor responders. The central macular thickness (CMT) was 436.22 ± 54.66 µm preoperatively and 308.12 ± 33.09 µm postoperatively in good responder patients; and was 387.74 ± 44.05 µm preoperatively and 372.09 ± 52.86 µm postoperatively in poor responders. By comparing the pre injection size of the foveal avascular zone area (FAZ-A) in both groups, it found that the mean ± SD of FAZ-A was 0.297 ± 0.038 mm in good responder patients compared to 0.407 ± 0.05 mm in non-responder patients. The preoperative superficial capillary plexus (SCP) foveal vascular density (VD) was 24.02 ± 3.01% in good responder patients versus 17.89 ± 3.19% um in poor responders. The preoperative SCP parafoveal VD was 43.06 ± 2.67% in good responder patients versus 37.96 ± 1.82% um in poor responders. The preoperative deep capillary plexus (DCP) foveal VD was 30.58 ± 2.89% in good responder patients versus 25.45 ± 3.14% in poor responders. The preoperative DCP parafoveal VD was 45.66 ± 2.21% in good responder patients versus 43.26 ± 2.35% um in poor responders, this was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: OCTA offers an accurate measurement for VD in the macula as well as the FAZ-A which could be used to predict an early anatomical response of anti-VEGF treatment in DME.

Efficacy and safety of treat-and-extend intravitreal brolucizumab in naive and switched patients with macular neovascularization: one-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: to analyze, at one year, the efficacy and safety of treat-and-extend (T&E) intravitreal (IV) Brolucizumab in patients affected by macular neovascularization (MNV). Both naïve and previously treated (i.e., switched) patients were included, and the data from the two groups were compared. METHODS: anatomical (i.e., central subfoveal thickness, CST; presence of fluid), functional (i.e., best corrected visual acuity, BCVA) and treatment-related (i.e., number of IV injections within the study period; number of patients reaching a 12-weeks interval between treatments) data from 41 eyes of 41 subjects (20 naïve and 21 switched) were analyzed. Patients were treated with 3 monthly IV injections followed by a T&E regimen based on a disease activity assessment performed at each scheduled IV treatment. RESULTS: significant CST reduction (from 412.1 ± 115.8 to 273.2 ± 61.6; p < 0.05) and BCVA (mean; p) improvement were observed in the naïve group, while in the switched cohort, both parameters were almost stable. In the naïve and switched groups, 55% and 33.5% of patients, respectively, reached a 12-week IV interval at one year, with a mean of 6.55 ± 1 and 7.43 ± 0.68 IV treatments, respectively. One patient with mild anterior uveitis without sequelae was recorded. CONCLUSION: In patients with MNV, IV Brolucizumab injections following a T&E regimen demonstrated great efficacy and a good safety profile, with greater anatomical and functional results in naïve patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (protocol number 155/2020, general registry number n°11486, InterHospital Ethics Committee, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy).

Effects of intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) monotherapy in central retinal vein occlusion in young subjects.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-angiogenic agent Bevacizumab in central retinal venous occlusion treatment. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of Bevacizumab and ophthalmological parameters such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in central retinal venous occlusion in patients aged less than 30. Methods: This is a prospective, interventional study, done on 25 eyes of 25 patients aged 30 years and below with central retinal venous occlusion, who received intravitreal Bevacizumab injections for three consecutive months. The mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography were compared and correlated at baseline after 3 months and 6 months follow-up. Results: The mean best corrected visual acuity and the central macular thickness on OCT improved significantly from 1.08±0.29 and 454.80±114.5µm at baseline to 0.77±0.32 logMAR units and 339.7±82.5µm after 6 months follow up. Conclusion: The current study showed that intravitreal Bevacizumab at a dose of 1.25 mg and with strict control of systemic contributory parameters seemed to improve BCVA and CMT and macular edema measured at baseline to 3 months and 6 months follow-up after three consecutive monthly injections.

New prefilled syringe aflibercept design. A cause of symptomatic IOP spike after aflibercept PFS?

Objective: To describe ocular hypertension cases after using a new aflibercept prefilled syringe and to assess the main characteristics of these eyes and their possible association with intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. Methods: Case series. We reported all the cases of ocular hypertension following aflibercept prefilled syringes (PFS) treatment in our department between April 2021 and December 2023. Results: A total of 4183 eyes were treated with aflibercept PSF. Thirteen transitory IOP elevations were observed immediately after injection (0.3%). Two eyes had an IOP between 30-35 mmHg, five eyes had an IOP between 36-55 mmHg and three eyes had an IOP > 56 mmHg. The mean IOP was 45.5 mmHg±11.33. Only six eyes needed anterior chamber paracentesis (37.5%). The other patients were treated conservatively (ocular massage and/or IOP-lowering drops). The mean IOP after treatment was 15.71 mmHg±7.20. Visual acuity improved after treatment in all the patients. Discussion: Compared with other injectors, reports have indicated a higher incidence of moderate and severe IOP spikes with aflibercept PSF. The European Medicine Agency (EMA) has associated this significant increase with incorrect syringe handling, leading to higher injection volumes. Although plunger misalignment seems to play a role in the IOP spikes, some other characteristics of this new injector could play a role. Factors such as syringe diameter, plunger alignment, and injection force may contribute to this issue. The reason some authors found no significant differences in IOP elevation after IVI, with aflibercept PFS, could be due to variations in patient characteristics, which may also play an important role in post-IVI pressure changes. Conclusions: Intraocular pressure spikes after aflibercept PFS can be explained by injector characteristics. The PFS of aflibercept has a domed plunger. Incorrect alignment between the base of the plunger and the black dosing line could cause an increase in the injected volume. Furthermore, the wider syringe diameter of aflibercept PFS could imply a larger injection force, increasing the risk of IOP elevation. Patient characteristics, such as previous VPP, axial length, or glaucoma history, may also play a role. Further studies are required to develop an ideal intravitreal syringe.

Subconjunctival injection of anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab as treatment in patients with dry eye disease.

To assess the effect of subconjunctival injection of anti-VEGF bevacizumab in the management of dry eye disease in a tertiary care hospital. In this quasi-experimental trial 150 eyes of 75 patients were selected using non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Detailed clinical examination was performed, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire score, tear film break-up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test 2 were measured and compared pre and post injection. Six patients were excluded and sixty-six patients were included having the mean age was 65.3 (SD=±10.2) years, 50% were aged 66-83 years old, 65.2% were female. Pre injection OSDI score was 30.3 (SD=±2.79), whereas post injection it was 20.2 (SD=±3.01). Pre injection TBUT was 3.0 (SD=±0.30), whereas post injection it was 5.17 (SD=±0.40). Pre injection Schirmer 2 test was 7.97 (SD=±0.51), whereas post injection it was 10.5 (SD=±0.50). Ten patients suffered mild subconjunctival hemorrhage which resolved spontaneously. Three patients were lost to follow up. Subconjunctival injection of anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab can offer a modern and safe solution in patients suffering from dry eye disease nevertheless more trials with large number of patients and longer follow up durations are required for widespread adaptation.

Baseline characteristics associated with the first year treatment interval of intravitreal faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

AIMS: To identify baseline characteristics that best correlate to treatment interval for naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients treated with faricimab in the first year (Y1) of the TENAYA and LUCERNE phase 3 trials, and to further understand how these characteristics may impact treatment intervals. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of Y1 data from the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials evaluated ocular baseline characteristics associated with Y1 treatment intervals. Patients were categorised into three subgroups based on their Y1 treatment interval: Q16W, Q12W or Q8W. Baseline characteristics (central subfield thickness (CST), best-corrected visual acuity, presence of subretinal fluid in centre 1 mm, presence of retinal fluid in centre 1 mm, macular neovascularisation (MNV) location and MNV type) were inputted into an R package 'rpart' to create a classification tree model. A data-driven tree model based on CST was fitted, producing CST subgroups of low, middle and high ranges. Within each CST subgroup, the model identified the most impactful variables and associated thresholds. RESULTS: After fitting the data to produce data-driven CST ranges, the model chose MNV location, followed by MNV lesion type as the most impactful baseline characteristics with these factors having a p value <0.05 in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Among the selected ocular baseline characteristics from TENAYA and LUCERNE trial, CST, MNV type and MNV location were seen as the most relevant variables to enable extension of treatment intervals during Y1. While this analysis provides insights for treatment intervals during the first year, further analysis incorporating Y2 data from the TENAYA and LUCERNE studies will be needed to assess factors influencing treatment intervals over a longer period.

The VALTIVE1 study protocol: a study for the validation of Tie2 as the first tumour vascular response biomarker for VEGF inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Anti-angiogenic, VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) increase progression-free survival (PFS) and, in some cases, overall survival in many solid tumours. However, their use has been compromised by a lack of informative biomarkers. We have shown that plasma Tie2 is the first tumour vascular response biomarker for VEGFi in ovarian, colorectal and gall bladder cancer: If plasma Tie2 concentrations do not change after 9 weeks of treatment with a VEGFi, the patient does not benefit, whereas a confirmed reduction of at least 10% plasma Tie2 defines a vascular response with a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of 0.56. The aim of the VALTIVE1 study is to validate the utility of plasma Tie2 as a vascular response biomarker and to optimise the Tie2-definition of vascular response so that the subsequent randomised discontinuation VALTIVE2 study can be powered optimally. METHODS: VALTIVE1 is a multi-centre, single arm, non-interventional biomarker study, with a sample size of 205 participants (176 bevacizumab-treated participants + 29 participants receiving bevacizumab and olaparib/PARPi), who are 16 years or older, have FIGO stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer on treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Their blood plasma samples will be collected before, during, and after treatment and the concentration of Tie2 will be determined. The primary objective is to define the PFS difference between Tie2-defined vascular responders and Tie2-defined vascular non-responders in patients receiving bevacizumab for high-risk Ovarian Cancer. Secondary objectives include defining the relationship between Tie2-defined vascular progression and disease progression assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and assessing the impact of PARPi on the plasma concentration of Tie2 and, therefore, the decision-making utility of Tie2 as a vascular response biomarker for bevacizumab during combined bevacizumab-PARPi maintenance. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to establish a test that tells patients and their doctors when VEGFi are working and when they stop working. The data generated from this study will be used to design a second trial aiming to prove conclusively the value of the Tie2 test. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04523116. Registered on 21 Aug 2020.

Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept and Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, recurrence rate, and recurrence interval of intravitreal injection of aflibercept (IVA) and ranibizumab (IVR) in patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of neonates hospitalized from January 2018 to March 2023 in the Department of Neonatology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University who received intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor owing to type 1 prethreshold ROP, threshold ROP, or aggressive posterior ROP. Clinical data were collected to record the cure, recurrence, number of injections, and side effects of ROP. FINDINGS: A total of 224 neonates (444 eyes) were enrolled in this study, of which 121 (241 eyes) received IVA and 103 (203 eyes) received IVR. There were no significant differences in the general characteristics of infants between the two groups (P > 0.05). The corrected gestational age of the first injection was 37.27 ± 3.07 weeks in the IVA group and 37.20 ± 4.89 weeks in the IVR group (P = 0.582). The recurrence rate was 15.8% in the IVA group and 14.9% in the IVR group (P = 0.841). For relapsed infants, the postmenstrual age (PMA) was 34.89 ± 3.49 weeks in the IVA group and 35.28 ± 4.43 weeks in the IVR group at the first treatment. The PMA was 43.69 ± 4.57 and 40.96 ± 4.98 weeks at the second treatment in the IVA and IVR groups, respectively (P = 0.185). There were two children in the IVA group that required a third treatment, with PMAs of 58.71 and 57.29 weeks at the time of surgery, and one child in the IVR group, with a PMA of 43.14 weeks at the time of injection (P = 0.221). No complications were recorded in either group. IMPLICATIONS: The efficacies of aflibercept and ranibizumab in treating ROP are similar, and the safety of the medications was good. Further research should be conducted in large-scale, prospective clinical trials, providing ophthalmologists with new options for the treatment of ROP.

Association between renal function and the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Long-Term Cohort Study.

To determine the correlation between the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). The retrospective 2-year cohort study included eyes with DME confirmed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, between 2010 and 2020. All the eyes were treated with an intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) during regular follow-up around 2 years. They were categorized into 3 different groups: an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 (mL/min per 1.73 m2) (group A), < 60 (group B), and patients undergoing hemodialysis (group C). The main outcome measures were (1) visual improvement, (2) structural improvement, and (3) the injection frequency of anti-VEGF in the different groups. In this study, 167 eyes from 120 patients were enrolled. Compared with groups B and C, the eyes in group A experienced the only significant visual improvement at month 3, month 6, and month 12 (P = 0.0001, 0.0002, 0.0013, respectively). The presence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal cysts was significantly decreased in groups A and B. In the treatment frequency analysis, the number of injections was the highest in group A and lowest in group C during the study period (P = 0.04). The severity of CKD had an impact on the DME treatment. The less severe CKD was, the greater the visual improvement that could be achieved. In addition, relatively poor renal function required a lower anti-VEGF injection frequency. The active prevention of the progression of CKD may play a key role in DME treatment.

Stakeholder insights on cost, quality, and incorporating patient voice in managed care decisions on neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration: Findings from the AMCP Market Insights program.

Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an acquired degeneration of the retina that can lead to central vision impairment. It is primarily treated with intravitreal injections of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Although vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors can effectively prevent progression of vision loss in many patients, they require ongoing regular administration and are therefore associated with considerable treatment burden. To gain insights into the impact of wet AMD and its treatment, AMCP convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in April 2024 through its Market Insights program. Key issues related to wet AMD identified by participants included cost and affordability, provider-related considerations, biosimilar adoption, measuring and improving quality, and incorporating the patient voice. Suggested payer best practices related to these issues in wet AMD also emerged from the discussion.

Emerging Nanomedicine Approaches in Targeted Lung Cancer Treatment.

Lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, is characterized by its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. As traditional chemotherapy has the disadvantage of non-specificity, nanomedicine offers innovative approaches for targeted therapy, particularly through the development of nanoparticles that can deliver therapeutic agents directly to cancer cells, minimizing systemic toxicity and enhancing treatment efficacy. VEGF and VEGFR are shown to be responsible for activating different signaling cascades, which will ultimately enhance tumor development, angiogenesis, and metastasis. By inhibiting VEGF and VEGFR signaling pathways, these nanotherapeutics can effectively disrupt tumor angiogenesis and proliferation. This review highlights recent advancements in nanoparticle design, including lipid-based, polymeric, and inorganic nanoparticles, and their clinical implications in improving lung cancer outcomes, exploring the role of nanomedicine in lung cancer diagnoses and treatment.

Evaluation of the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders on anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema in real life: MARMASIA study group report No. 10.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders (VMID) on treatment response in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) due to diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Three hundred seventy-seven eyes of 239 patients in the MARMASIA Study Group who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment (IVT) due to DME were included in the study. The group 1 consisted of 44 eyes of the patients who had not received any treatment before, were followed up regularly for 24 months after at least a 3-month loading dose, and suffered from VMID such as epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion or traction, and lamellar hole. The group 2 consisted of 333 eyes of the patients without VMID. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) of the patients at baseline, 3rd month, 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year follow-ups were measured. RESULTS: The mean age of the Groups 1 and 2 was 67.1 ± 11.3 and 61.9 ± 10.2 years, respectively. 61.3% of the group 1 and 58.8% of the group 2 were female (p > 0.05). The duration of diabetes was 19.2 ± 3.7 and 15.8 ± 3.2 years, respectively, and the number of follow-ups was 16.09 ± 4.68 and 12.06 ± 4.58, respectively in the groups (p < 0.001, 0.001, respectively). The number of IVT was 7.13 ± 2.71 and 7.20 ± 2.22, respectively in the groups 1 and 2 and no statistically significant difference was observed between them (p = 0.860). According to logMAR, BCVA values at baseline were 0.63 ± 0.24 and 0.59 ± 0.26 (p = 0.29), respectively, in the groups and the amount of change in BCVA at the end of the 2nd year was - 0.02 ± 0.48 in the group 1 and - 0.12 ± 0.48 in the group 2. It was observed as 0.48 (p = 0.13). Although the increase in BCVA was greater at all follow-ups in the group 2 compared to their initial examination, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of BCVA change. The CMT values of the groups at baseline were 442.5 ± 131.3 µm and 590.9 ± 170.6 µm, respectively (p = 0.03) The decrease in CMT after IVT was significantly greater in the group 2 at all follow-ups when compared to the first group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While the presence of VMID in DME patients receiving IVT did not affect visual results, it negatively affected the anatomical response and macular edema morphology. The presence of VMID at baseline affected the success of IVT. It should be taken into consideration that VMID may resolve spontaneously or with IVT, and new cases of VMID may occur in patients during the treatment process.

Advancements and emerging trends in ophthalmic anti-VEGF therapy: a bibliometric analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is associated with abnormal fundus neovascularization. Consequently, Anti-VEGF agents are vital for ophthalmic treatment. This paper reviews the application of anti-VEGF agents in ophthalmology over the past two decades with the aim of providing insights for further research. METHODS: A meticulous search strategy was employed in the Web of Science Core Collection literature from 2003 to 2023 to gather relevant literature, which was then analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package Bibliometrix. RESULTS: The study included 3,602 publications from 83 countries and 3,445 institutions. The United States and China have emerged as leading contributors in terms of the publication volume. Johns Hopkins University, the University of Sydney, and Genentech Inc were identified as frontrunners in this field. "Retina" had the highest publication volume, whereas "Ophthalmology" had the highest citation frequency. Among the 15,918 scholars, Bressler NM, Holz FG, Glassman AR, and Bandello F led in publication volume, while Brown DM was the most cited author. High-frequency keywords included "Endothelial Growth Factor," "Therapy," "Safety," and "Randomized Clinical Trial." CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF drugs have shown notable success in treating neovascular eye diseases, especially wet age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema, focusing on clinical efficacy, injection regimens, and safety. Future directions include developing new anti-VEGF drugs, drug delivery systems, non-invasive administration, multi-target drugs, leveraging big data and artificial intelligence, and addressing the current treatment limits. Continuous innovation and method improvement in this field promise more breakthroughs, providing effective, safe, and economical options for eye disease treatment.