RESUMO
We present gallbladder rupture following trauma. A 9-year-old boy admitted in 1.5 hours after injury. Considering clinical and ultrasound data, we diagnosed traumatic damage to the spleen and hemoperitoneum, biliary dyskinesia, cholestasis, sludge. Hemostatic therapy was carried out. After 3 days, signs of peritonitis appeared. Follow-up ultrasound revealed gallbladder enlargement with heterogeneous content, fluid in all parts of abdominal cavity. Intraoperatively, the gallbladder was enveloped in omentum soaked in bile. After mobilization of the gallbladder, we found longitudinal linear tear up to 3 cm clogged with omentum. Cholecystectomy was performed. Thus, we present a patient with combined injury and damage to the spleen. However, gallbladder wall thickening and heterogeneous content were interpreted as concomitant pathology. Delayed manifestation of peritonitis was due to gallbladder enveloped in omentum. The last one soaked in bile partially entered the gallbladder through perforation and prevented bile leakage into abdominal cavity. Timely diagnosis of gallbladder damage presents certain difficulties, especially in case of combined injury. Ultrasound signs of traumatic gallbladder rupture in this case were wall thickening, heterogeneous content and gradual gallbladder enlargement. It is necessary to analyze all organs at the damage site including computed tomography in patients with combined trauma.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Vesícula Biliar , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Vesícula Biliar/lesões , Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Colecistectomia/métodos , Ruptura , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Baço/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/diagnóstico , Peritonite/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Isolated pancreatic injury after blunt abdominal trauma is rare but unreliably excludable based on clinical symptoms. A CT-abdomen is the golden standard in diagnosing. Undiagnosed pancreatic injury can result in severe complications as abscesses and fistulas. CASE DESCRIPTION: A sixteen-year old patient was brought to the Emergency Department (ED) with epigastric pain, two days after a low-energy scooter accident. No (abdominal) alarming symptoms were objectified during direct assessment by the general practitioner. However, a complete pancreatic transection was diagnosed after assessment at the ED, eventually resulting in a distal pancreatectomy with postoperative associated complications. CONCLUSION: In all traumas, the mechanism of injury should be judged critically for the possibility of abdominal injury (as pancreatic damage) and thus the need for imaging. An initially harmless clinical condition can mask extensive injury. This case illustrates the importance of thoughtful expectant policies with return instructions or demarcated follow-up when no CT-scan is performed.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Pâncreas , Pancreatectomia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Pâncreas/lesões , Masculino , Adolescente , Acidentes de Trânsito , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: When an injured patient arrives in the Emergency Department (ED), timely and appropriate care is crucial. Shock Index Pediatric Age-Adjusted (SIPA) has been shown to accurately identify pediatric patients in need of emergency interventions. However, no study has evaluated SIPA against age-adjusted tachycardia (AT). This study aims to compare SIPA with AT in predicting outcomes such as mortality, severe injury, and the need for emergent intervention in pediatric trauma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patient data abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files (TQIP PUFs) for years 2013-2020. Patients aged 4-16 with blunt mechanism of injury and injury severity score (ISS) > 15 were included. 36,517 children met this criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, overtriage, and undertriage rates were calculated to compare the effectiveness of AT and elevated SIPA as predictors of severe injuries and need for emergent intervention. Emergent interventions included craniotomy, endotracheal intubation, thoracotomy, laparotomy, or chest tube placement within 24 h of arrival. RESULTS: AT classified 59% of patients as "high risk," while elevated SIPA identified 26%. Compared to AT patients, a greater proportion of patients with elevated SIPA required a blood transfusion within 24 h (22% vs. 12%, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher for the elevated SIPA group than AT (10% vs. 5%, respectively; p < 0.001) as well as the need for emergent operative interventions (43% vs. 32% respectively; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or higher liver/spleen lacerations requiring blood transfusion were also more common among elevated SIPA patients than AT patients (8% vs. 4%, respectively; p < 0.001). AT demonstrated greater sensitivity but lower specificity compared to SIPA across all outcomes. AT showed improved overtriage and undertriage rates compared to SIPA, but this is attributed to identifying a large proportion of the sample as "high risk." CONCLUSIONS: AT outperforms SIPA in sensitivity for mortality, injury severity and emergent interventions in pediatric trauma patients while the specificity of SIPA is high across these outcomes.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Choque , Taquicardia , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Pré-Escolar , Taquicardia/diagnóstico , Choque/mortalidade , Choque/diagnóstico , Triagem/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mortality reviews examine US military fatalities resulting from traumatic injuries during combat operations. These reviews are essential to the evolution of the military trauma system to improve individual, unit, and system-level trauma care delivery and inform trauma system protocols and guidelines. This study identifies specific prehospital and hospital interventions with the potential to provide survival benefits. METHODS: US Special Operations Command fatalities with battle injuries deemed potentially survivable (2001-2021) were extracted from previous mortality reviews. A military trauma review panel consisting of trauma surgeons, forensic pathologists, and prehospital and emergency medicine specialists conducted a methodical review to identify prehospital, hospital, and resuscitation interventions (e.g., laparotomy, blood transfusion) with the potential to have provided a survival benefit. RESULTS: Of 388 US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities, 100 were deemed potentially survivable. Of these (median age, 29 years; all male), 76.0% were injured in Afghanistan, and 75% died prehospital. Gunshot wounds were in 62.0%, followed by blast injury (37%), and blunt force injury (1.0%). Most had a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale severity classified as 4 (severe) (55.0%) and 5 (critical) (41.0%). The panel recommended 433 interventions (prehospital, 188; hospital, 315). The most recommended prehospital intervention was blood transfusion (95%), followed by finger/tube thoracostomy (47%). The most common hospital recommendations were thoracotomy and definitive vascular repair. Whole blood transfusion was assessed for each fatality: 74% would have required ≥10 U of blood, 20% would have required 5 to 10 U, 1% would have required 1 to 4 U, and 5% would not have required blood products to impact survival. Five may have benefited from a prehospital laparotomy. CONCLUSION: This study systematically identified capabilities needed to provide a survival benefit and examined interventions needed to inform trauma system efforts along the continuum of care. The determination was that blood transfusion and massive transfusion shortly after traumatic injury would impact survival the most. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level V.
Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Transfusão de Sangue/normas , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Consenso , Medicina Militar/normas , Medicina Militar/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Militares , Ressuscitação/métodos , Ressuscitação/normas , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/terapia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Explosões/terapia , Traumatismos por Explosões/mortalidade , Lesões Relacionadas à Guerra/terapia , Lesões Relacionadas à Guerra/mortalidadeRESUMO
Diagnosis of relevant organ injury after blunt abdominal injury (AI) in multiple-injury/polytraumatised patients is challenging. AI can be distinguished between injuries of parenchymatous organs (POI) of the upper abdomen (liver, spleen) and bowel and mesenteric injuries (BMI). Still, such injuries may be associated with delays in diagnosis and treatment. The present study aimed to verify laboratory parameters, imaging diagnostics, physical examination and related injuries to predict intraabdominal injuries. This retrospective, single-centre study includes data from multiple-injury/polytraumatised patients between 2005 and 2017. Two main groups were defined with relevant abdominal injury (AI+) and without abdominal injury (AI-). The AI+ group was divided into three subgroups: BMI+, BMI+/POI+, and POI+. Groups were compared in a univariate analysis for significant differences. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors for AI+, BMI+ and POI+. 26.3% (271 of 1032) of the included patients had an abdominal injury. Subgroups were composed of 4.7% (49 of 1032) BMI+, 4.7% (48 of 1032) BMI+/POI+ and 16.8% (174 of 1032) POI+. Pathological abdominal signs had a sensitivity of 48.7% and a specificity of 92.4% for AI+. Transaminases were significantly higher in cases of AI+. Pathological computed tomography (CT) (free fluid, parenchymal damage, Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS), CT Grade > 4) was summarised and had a sensitivity of 94.8%, a specificity of 98%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.5% and, negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.2% for AI+. The detected predictors for AI+ were pathological abdominal findings (odds ratio (OR) 3.93), pathological multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) (OR 668.9), alanine (ALAT) ≥ 1.23 µmol/ls (OR 2.35) and associated long bone fractures (OR 3.82). Pathological abdominal signs, pathological MSCT and lactate (LAC) levels ≥ 1.94 mmol/l could be calculated as significant risk factors for BMI+. For POI+ pathological abdominal MSCT, ASAT ≥ 1.73 µmol/ls and concomitant thoracic injuries had significant relevance. The study presents reliable risk factors for abdominal injury and its sub-entities. The predictors can be explained by the anatomy of the trunk and existing studies. Elevated transaminases predicted abdominal injury (AI+) and, specifically, the POI+. The pathological MSCT was the most reliable predictive parameter. However, it was essential to include further relevant parameters.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Traumatismo Múltiplo , Humanos , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diagnóstico Precoce , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-operative management is the standard of care for pediatric blunt splenic injury. The American Pediatric Surgical Association recommends intensive care unit monitoring only for grade IV/V blunt splenic injury; however, variation remains regarding this practice. We hypothesized that pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to a non-intensive care unit setting would have similar outcomes to those admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS: The 2017 to 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 years) with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries. Patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate >90 were excluded. Pediatric trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit were compared to non-intensive care unit admissions. The primary outcome was splenectomy. Bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 461 pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries, 186 (40.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit patients were older than their non-intensive care unit counterparts (15 vs 14 years, P = .03). Intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients had a similar rate of splenectomy (0.5% vs 0.7%, P = .80) and time to surgery (19.7 vs 19.8 hours, P = .98). Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days, P < .001). There were no significant complications or deaths in either group. CONCLUSION: This national analysis demonstrated that hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to the floor or intensive care unit had a similar rate of splenectomy without complications or deaths. This aligns with American Pediatric Surgical Association recommendations that pediatric trauma patients with grade III blunt splenic injuries be managed in non-intensive care unit settings. Widespread adoption is warranted and should lead to decreased healthcare expenditures.
Assuntos
Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Baço , Esplenectomia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Baço/lesões , Adolescente , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia has been shown to portend worse outcomes in injured patients; however, little is known about the impact of thoracic muscle wasting on outcomes of patients with chest wall injury. We hypothesized that reduced pectoralis muscle mass is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe blunt chest wall injury. METHODS: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit between 2014 and 2019 with blunt chest wall injury requiring mechanical ventilation were retrospectively identified. Blunt chest wall injury was defined as the presence of one or more rib fractures as a result of blunt injury mechanism. Exclusion criteria included lack of admission computed tomography imaging, penetrating trauma, <18 y of age, and primary neurologic injury. Thoracic musculature was assessed by measuring pectoralis muscle cross-sectional area (cm2) that was obtained at the fourth thoracic vertebral level using Slice-O-Matic software. The area was then divided by the patient height in meters2 to calculate pectoralis muscle index (PMI) (cm2/m2). Patients were divided into two groups, 1) the lowest gender-specific quartile of PMI and 2) second-fourth gender-specific PMI quartiles for comparative analysis. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria with a median (interquartile range) age 48 y (34-60), body mass index of 30.1 kg/m2 (24.9-34.6), and rib score of 3.0 (2.0-4.0). Seventy-five percent of patients (116/153) were male. Fourteen patients (8%) had prior history of chronic lung disease. Median (IQR) intensive care unit length-of-stay and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) was 18.0 d (13.0-25.0) and 15.0 d (10.0-21.0), respectively. Seventy-three patients (48%) underwent tracheostomy and nine patients (6%) expired during hospitalization. On multivariate linear regression, reduced pectoralis muscle mass was associated with increased MV duration when adjusting for rib score and injury severity score (ß 5.98, 95% confidence interval 1.28-10.68, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced pectoralis muscle mass is associated with increased duration of MV in patients with severe blunt chest wall injury. Knowledge of this can help guide future research and risk stratification of critically ill chest wall injury patients.
Assuntos
Músculos Peitorais , Respiração Artificial , Traumatismos Torácicos , Parede Torácica , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Músculos Peitorais/lesões , Músculos Peitorais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Parede Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Parede Torácica/lesões , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico , Sarcopenia/etiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Idoso , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) versus splenectomy in adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) compared SAE versus splenectomy in adults with blunt high-grade splenic injuries (grade ≥ IV). Patients were stratified first by hemodynamic status then splenic injury grade. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and transfusion requirements at four and 24 h from arrival. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred nine hemodynamically stable patients were analyzed, with 2975 (95.7%) undergoing splenectomy and 134 (4.3%) with SAE. One thousand eight hundred sixty five patients had grade IV splenic injuries, and 1244 had grade V. Patients managed with SAE had 72% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; P = 0.002), significantly shorter ICU-LOS (7 versus 9 d, 95%, P = 0.028), and received a mean of 1606 mL less packed red blood cells at four h compared to those undergoing splenectomy. Patients with grade IV or V injuries both had significantly lower odds of mortality (IV: OR 0.153, P < 0.001; V: OR 0.365, P = 0.041) and were given less packed red blood cells within four h when treated with SAE (2056 mL versus 405 mL, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SAE may be a safer and more effective management approach for hemodynamically stable adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries, as demonstrated by its association with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter ICU-LOS, and lower transfusion requirements compared to splenectomy.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Baço , Esplenectomia , Artéria Esplênica , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Embolização Terapêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Esplenectomia/métodos , Esplenectomia/mortalidade , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Baço/lesões , Baço/cirurgia , Baço/irrigação sanguínea , Artéria Esplênica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodinâmica , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Adulto Jovem , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine risk factors for substantial closed-globe injuries in orbital fractures (SCGI) and to develop the best multivariate model for the prediction of SCGI. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed with orbital fractures at Farabi Hospital between 2016 and 2022. Patients with a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination and orbital CT scan were included. Predictive signs or imaging findings for SCGI were identified by logistic regression (LR) analysis. Support vector machine (SVM), random forest regression (RFR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were also trained using a fivefold cross-validation method. RESULTS: A total of 415 eyes from 403 patients were included. Factors associated with an increased risk of SCGI were reduced uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), increased difference between UCVA of the traumatic eye from the contralateral eye, older age, male sex, grade of periorbital soft tissue trauma, trauma in the occupational setting, conjunctival hemorrhage, extraocular movement restriction, number of fractured walls, presence of medial wall fracture, size of fracture, intraorbital emphysema and retrobulbar hemorrhage. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic for LR, SVM, RFR, and XGBoost for the prediction of SCGI was 57.2%, 68.8%, 63.7%, and 73.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and radiographic findings could be utilized to efficiently predict SCGI. XGBoost outperforms the logistic regression model in the prediction of SCGI and could be incorporated into clinical practice.
Assuntos
Fraturas Orbitárias , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Orbitárias/diagnóstico , Fraturas Orbitárias/epidemiologia , Fraturas Orbitárias/complicações , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Curva ROC , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Oculares/epidemiologia , CriançaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Clinical implications of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) after low-energy mechanisms of injury (LEMI) remain unclear. We assessed BCVI incidence and outcomes in LEMI versus high-energy mechanisms of injury (HEMI) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, blunt trauma adults admitted between July 2015 and June 2021 with cervical spine fractures, excluding single spinous process, osteophyte, and chronic fractures were included. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, screening and treatment data, iatrogenic complications, and mortality were collected. Our primary end point was to compare BCVI rates between LEMI and HEMI patients. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty patients (78%) were screened for BCVI; 120 were positive for BCVI. LEMI and HEMI groups presented similar BCVI rates (12.6% versus 14.4%; P = 0.640). Compared to HEMI patients (n = 95), LEMI patients (n = 25) were significantly older (79 ± 14.9 versus 54.3 ± 17.4, P < 0.001), more likely to be on anticoagulants before admission (64% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), and less severely injured (LEMI injury severity score 10.9 ± 6.6 versus HEMI injury severity score 18.7 ± 11.4, P = 0.001). All but one LEMI and 90.5% of the HEMI patients had vertebral artery injuries with no significant difference in BCVI grades. One HEMI patient developed acute kidney injury because of BCVI screening. Eleven HEMI patients developed BCVI-related stroke with two related mortalities. One LEMI patient died of a BCVI-related stroke. CONCLUSIONS: BCVI rates were similar between HEMI and LEMI groups when screening based on cervical spine fractures. The LEMI group exhibited no screening or treatment complications, suggesting that benefits may outweigh the risks of screening and potential bleeding complications from treatment.
Assuntos
Traumatismo Cerebrovascular , Vértebras Cervicais , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Idoso , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Adulto , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/complicações , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/epidemiologia , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Incidência , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity in trauma. It is unclear whether the type of hemorrhage control procedure (i.e., splenectomy versus angioembolization) is associated with an increased risk of VTE. We hypothesize that hemodynamically stable patients undergoing angioembolization for blunt high-grade splenic injuries have lower rates of VTE compared to those undergoing splenectomy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program dataset from 2017 to 2019 was queried to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 3-5 blunt splenic injuries. Outcomes including VTE rates were compared between those who were managed with splenectomy versus angioembolization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed adjusting for age, sex, initial vital signs, Injury Severity Score, and splenic injury grade. RESULTS: The analysis included 4698 matched patients (splenectomy [n = 2349] and angioembolization [n = 2349]). The median (interquartile range) age was 41 (27-58) years and 69% were male. Patients were well matched between groups. Angioembolization was associated with significantly lower VTE than splenectomy (2.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.010) despite less use of VTE chemoprophylaxis (70% versus 80%, P < 0.001), as well as a relative delay in initiation of chemoprophylaxis (44 h versus 33 h, P < 0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were also significantly lower in the angioembolization group. CONCLUSIONS: Angioembolization is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE than splenectomy. Thus, angioembolization should be considered for initial management of hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries in whom laparotomy is not otherwise indicated.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Baço , Esplenectomia , Tromboembolia Venosa , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Baço/lesões , Baço/cirurgia , Baço/irrigação sanguínea , Esplenectomia/efeitos adversos , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Pontuação de PropensãoAssuntos
Dor no Peito , Fraturas Ósseas , Esterno , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Esterno/lesões , Esterno/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , CriançaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We aim to evaluate the association of early versus late venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis on in-hospital mortality among patients with severe blunt isolated traumatic brain injuries. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File for 2017-2021 were analyzed. The target population included adult trauma patients with severe isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI). VTE prophylaxis types (low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin) and their administration timing were analyzed in relation to in-hospital complications and mortality. RESULTS: The study comprised 3609 patients, predominantly Caucasian males, with an average age of 48.5 y. Early VTE prophylaxis recipients were younger (P < 0.01) and more likely to receive unfractionated heparin (P < 0.01). VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h was associated with a higher average injury severity score and longer intensive care unit stays (P < 0.01). Logistic regression revealed that VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h was associated with significant reduction of in-hospital mortality by 38% (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.94, P = 0.02). Additionally, low molecular weight heparin use was associated with decreased mortality odds by 30% (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h is associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe isolated blunt TBI, as opposed to VTE prophylaxis within 24 h. These findings suggest the need for timely and appropriate VTE prophylaxis in TBI care, highlighting the critical need for a comprehensive assessment and further research concerning the safety and effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in these patient populations.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Heparina , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Masculino , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/mortalidade , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Blunt cardiac injury (BCI) can be challenging diagnostically, and if misdiagnosed, can lead to life-threatening complications. Our institution previously evaluated BCI screening with troponin and electrocardiogram (EKG) during a transition from troponin I to high sensitivity troponin (hsTnI), a more sensitive troponin I assay. The previous study found an hsTnI of 76 ng/L had the highest capability of accurately diagnosing a clinically significant BCI. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the newly implemented protocol. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with a sternal fracture from March 2022 to April 2023 at our urban level-1 trauma center were retrospectively reviewed for EKG findings, hsTnI trend, echocardiogram changes, and clinical outcomes. The BCI cohort and non-BCI cohort ordinal measures were compared using Wilcoxon's two-tailed rank sum test and categorical measures were compared with Fisher's exact test. Youden indices were used to evaluate hsTnI sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Sternal fractures were identified in 206 patients, of which 183 underwent BCI screening. Of those screened, 103 underwent echocardiogram, 28 were diagnosed with clinically significant BCIs, and 15 received intervention. The peak hsTnI threshold of 76 ng/L was found to have a Youden index of 0.31. Rather, the Youden index was highest at 0.50 at 40 ng/L (sensitivity 0.79 and specificity 0.71) for clinically significant BCI. CONCLUSIONS: Screening patients with sternal fractures for BCI using hsTnI and EKG remains effective. To optimize the hsTnI threshold, this study determined the hsTnI threshold should be lowered to 40 ng/L. Further improvements to the institutional protocol may be derived from multicenter analysis.
Assuntos
Eletrocardiografia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/sangue , Idoso , Traumatismos Cardíacos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Cardíacos/sangue , Troponina I/sangue , Esterno/lesões , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Biomarcadores/sangue , Fraturas Ósseas/sangue , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico , EcocardiografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Paediatric closed abdominal trauma is common, however, its severity and influence on survival are difficult to determine. No prognostic score integrating abdominal involvement exists to date in paediatrics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the severity and short-term and medium-term prognosis of closed abdominal trauma in children, and the performance of severity scores in predicting mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort, observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 0 to 18âyears presenting at the trauma room of a French paediatric Level I Trauma Centre over the period 2015 to 2019 with an isolated closed abdominal trauma or as part of a polytrauma. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was the six months mortality. Secondary outcomes were related complications and therapeutic interventions, and performance for predicting mortality of the scores listed. Paediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Shock Index Paediatric Age-adjusted (SIPA) score, Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale score (rSIG), Base Deficit, International Normalised Ratio, and Glasgow Coma Scale (BIG), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Trauma Score and the Injury Severity (TRISS) score. DATA COLLECTION: Data collected include clinical, biological and CT scan data at admission, first 24âh management and prognosis. The PTS, RTS, SIPA, rSIG, BIG and ISS scores were calculated and mortality was predicted according to BIG score and TRISS methodology. RESULTS: Of 1145 patients, 149 met the inclusion criteria and 12 (8.1%) died. Of the 12 deceased patients, 11 (91.7%) presented with severe head injury, 11 (91.7%) had blood products transfusion and 7 received tranexamic acid. ROC curves analysis concluded that PTS, RTS, rSIG and BIG scores accurately predict mortality in paediatric closed abdominal trauma with AUCs at least 0.92. The BIG score offered the best predictive performance for predicting mortality at a threshold of 24.8 [sensitivity 90%, specificity 92%, negative-predictive value (NPV) 99%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.93]. CONCLUSION: PEVALPED is the first French study to evaluate the prognosis of paediatric closed abdominal trauma. The use of PTS, rSIG and BIG scores are relevant from the acute phase and the pathophysiological interest and accuracy of the BIG score make it a powerful tool for predicting mortality of closed abdominal trauma in children.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , França/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidade , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Lactente , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Recém-Nascido , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Identifying patients who can be safely managed in lower-level trauma centers is critical to avoid overburdening level I centers. This study examines the transfer patterns and outcomes of blunt splenic injury (BSI) patients cared for at 2 regional level III trauma centers as compared to an associated level I center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all trauma patients with BSI admitted to 2 level III trauma centers (TC3) and a level I center (TC1) between 2012 and 2022. Patients were broken into 3 categories: TC1, TC3, and transfer patients (transferred from TC3 to TC1). RESULTS: A total of 1480 patients were admitted to TC1, 208 patients to TC3, and 128 were transferred. 22.7% of transfer patients were children. No difference in splenic injury grade was seen between patients managed at TC1 and TC3. Patients presenting to TC1 had more severe concomitant injuries. Patients underwent urgent splenectomy at similar rates at TC1 and TC3 (15.1 vs 18.7%, P = .1). Successful nonoperative management was achieved at similar rates (81.3 vs 75.5%, P = .1). When controlling for ISS and ED disposition, there was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and inpatient mortality between TC1 and TC3. CONCLUSION: Level III centers effectively managed BSI achieving comparable outcomes to the level 1 center. Transfers commonly occurred in pediatric and multisystem trauma patients, though high-grade splenic injuries were not predictive of transfer. High-grade BSI can be safely managed at level III centers without need for transfer.
Assuntos
Baço , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Baço/lesões , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Criança , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidadeRESUMO
The most common organs affected by abdominal trauma are the spleen and the liver, often in combination. Pancreatic injuries are rare. In the case of blunt abdominal trauma, which is much more common, a clinical and laboratory examination as well as sonography should be performed. In the initial assessment, the circulatory situation must be screened. If there is haemodynamic instability and presentation of free fluid, an emergency laparotomy is indicated. If the situation is stable or stabilised and a pathological sonography is present, it is essential to perform triphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography, which is also mandatory in polytraumatised patients. If a renal injury is suspected, a late venous phase should be attached. In addition to the classification of the injury, attention should be paid to possible vascular injury or active bleeding. In this case, angiography with the possibility of intervention should be performed. Endoscopic treatment is possible for injuries of the pancreatic duct. If the imaging does not reveal any intervention target and a circulation is stable, a conservative approach is possible with continuous monitoring using clinical, laboratory and sonographic controls. Most injuries can be successfully treated by non-operative management (NOM).There are various surgical options for treating the injury, such as local and resecting procedures. There is also the option of "damage control surgery" with acute bleeding control and second look. Complex surgical procedures should be performed at centres. Postoperative complications arise out of elective surgery.In the less common case of penetrating abdominal trauma, the actual extent of the injury cannot be estimated from the visible wound. Here again, the circulatory situation determines the next steps. An emergency laparotomy should be carried out in case of instability. If the condition is stable, further diagnostics should be performed using contrast enhanced computed tomography. If penetration through the peritoneum cannot be clearly excluded, diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Fígado , Pâncreas , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Humanos , Fígado/lesões , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado/cirurgia , Pâncreas/lesões , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Baço/lesões , Baço/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Laparotomia , Rim/lesões , Rim/diagnóstico por imagemAssuntos
Fendas de Ciclodiálise , Traumatismos Oculares , Hipotensão Ocular , Humanos , Hipotensão Ocular/etiologia , Hipotensão Ocular/diagnóstico , Hipotensão Ocular/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Oculares/complicações , Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Masculino , Fendas de Ciclodiálise/diagnóstico , Fendas de Ciclodiálise/etiologia , Fendas de Ciclodiálise/cirurgia , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Doenças Retinianas/etiologia , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Cápsula do Cristalino/lesões , Cápsula do Cristalino/cirurgia , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
PURPOSE: Pediatric traumatic retinal detachment (RD) resulting from open globe injuries (OGIs) or closed globe injuries (CGIs) presents unique challenges due to complexity often resulting in lifelong sequelae. This study compares pediatric traumatic RD outcomes and prognostic factors following OGI and CGI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis reviewed 47 cases of pediatric traumatic RD in children (age <18 years), who underwent RD surgery between 2002 and 2021. Among them, 25 cases were caused by CGI and 22 cases by OGI. Demographics, RD characteristics, surgical procedures, and anatomical and functional results were assessed. Predictive factors for visual outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: In the CGI group, mean (±SD) age was 11 years ± 4 years, and 10 years ± 5 years in the OGI group. Closed globe injury traumatic RD had significantly better preoperative (CGI: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 1.39 ± 0.19 (mean ± standard error); OGI: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 2.12 ± 0.20) and follow-up (CGI: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.94 ± 0.19; OGI: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 1.85 ± 0.20) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ( P < 0.05). Initial BCVA improvement was observed in CGI only. In multivariable analysis, prognostic factors for favorable BCVA outcomes included higher preoperative BCVA, older age, and absence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Visual prognosis for pediatric traumatic RD remains limited, favoring CGI cases compared with OGI. Baseline BCVA emerged as a major determinant of final visual acuity. Tailored management approaches can optimize treatment results.