Outcomes of Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Metastatic Disease: Impending and Pathologic Fractures.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation has become a treatment mean for impending and pathologic femur fractures. Currently there continues to be a lack of data examining functional outcomes, complications, and survivorship of patients treated with IMNs for metastatic disease of the femur. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 183 IMNs placed for impending (n=145) or pathologic (n=38) metastatic fractures from 2010 to 2018. Functional outcomes and complications including blood transfusions, venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) and reoperations were studied. RESULTS: Patients with impending lesions were more likely to be ambulatory at final follow-up (pathologic: 82%, impending: 99%, p<0.0001) and reported greater musculoskeletal tumor society scores (p<0.0001). Likewise, pathologic fractures were associated with greater discharge to non-home locations (p<0.0001) and were more likely to require a postoperative transfusion (pathologic: 66%, impending: 22%, p=0.0001). However, there was no difference in the incidence of VTEs (p=1.00) or reoperations (p=0.69) between cohorts. Patients treated for impending fractures had improved overall survival at 1 year (54% vs. 26%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: IMN fixation was durable in impending and pathologic femoral fractures. Early identification of metastases remains critical as patients treated for impending lesions had greater functional outcomes, fewer complications and improved survivorship compared to patients treated for pathologic fractures.

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty should not be selected as the primary option for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients aged 85 years or more.

This study aimed to compare the early outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BPH) in elderly intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) patients aged 85 years or more.This is a prospective cohort study, and we analyzed 120 elderly patients aged 85 years or more presented with ITFs who underwent BPH and PFNA between January 2017 and July 2018. 84 patients treated with PFNA were set as Group A, and 36 patients treated with BPH were set as Group B. Data such as gender, age, period of follow-up, fracture classification (according to Evans-Jensen classification), preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status, interval between injury and operation, method of anaesthesia, duration of operation time, blood loss during surgery, time of weight bearing after operation, incidence of complications 2 weeks after operation, mortality rates and Harris Hip Score 12 months after operation were recorded and compared.There are no statistically significant differences when compared general data in patients from group A and B (P > .05). Operation time in Group A is less than Group B (103.33, 40-230 min vs 122.64, 75-180 minute, P < .01). Blood loss during surgery in Group A is less than Group B (70.24, 50-100 mL vs 194.44, 100-500 mL, P < .01). Time of weight bearing after operation in Group A is longer than Group B (50.70, 7-100 days vs 6.67, 4-14 days, P < .01). Incidence of complications 2 weeks after operation in Group A is less than Group B (14.12% vs 36.11%, P < .01). Mortality rates 12 months after operation in Group A is similar with Group B (13.10% vs 19.44%, P > .05). Harris Hip Score 12 months after operation in Group A is similar with Group B (64.64,0-91 points vs 64.41, 0-90 points, P > .05).Although BPH and PFNA have similar functional outcome and mortality rates 12 months after operation, BPH has more postoperative complications in elderly patients aged 85 years or more with ITFs, Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty should not be selected as the primary option for ITFs in elderly patients aged 85 years or more.

Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly require either fixation or joint sacrificing surgery; proximal femoral nail (PFN) and bipolar hemiarthroplasties (BPH) are the most common interventions. PFN is considered to be the ideal construct for these fractures; however, the usage of hemiarthroplasties to facilitate earlier mobilization has been on a rise. Currently there is no consensus on the superiority of one of these two techniques over the other and the present review was done to determine this. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is PFN a better alternative to BPH for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly? OBJECTIVE: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the superiority of PFN over BPH by comparing the primary outcomes like mortality, Harris Hip scores (HHS), complications, and re-operations. Additionally, secondary outcomes like blood loss, duration of surgery, and period of hospital stays were also compared. METHODOLOGY: Three databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for relevant articles that directly compared PFN and BPH in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of seven studies published between the years 2005 to 2017. There were four retrospective and three prospective randomized controlled studies. The number of patients in these studies ranged from 53 to 303. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: There was a significant difference in HHS between two groups with standard mean difference of - 0.51 (range - 0.67 to -0.36), favouring the PFN group. The rate of mortality was higher in the BPH group with odds ratio of 2.07 (range 1.40-3.08). Implant-related complications like fractures and subsidence were more in BPH group but this was not significant. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Mean surgical time (standard mean difference 2.19) and blood loss (3.75) were significantly less in the PFN group. The duration of hospital stay was also found to be significantly less in the PFN group (2.66). CONCLUSION: Proximal femoral nails are superior to bipolar hemiarthroplasties for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. PFN imparts better functional outcomes and has lower rates of overall mortality. Additionally it is faster surgery, with lesser blood loss contributing to better results.

Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are associated with poor mortality and morbidity outcomes. Controversy exists over what the preferred treatment is between sliding hips screws (SHSs) and cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for stable intertrochanteric (IT) and basicervical (BC) hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes and complications in patients treated with SHS to those treated with CMN in IT and BC hip fractures. METHODS: We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify IT and BC hip fractures, excluding subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with a SHS and CMN for 2008 to 2016. After propensity score matching, there were 8505 patients in the SHS cohort and 8505 in the CMN cohort. Propensity score-adjusted multivariate regression models assed SHS as an independent risk factor for the following 30-day outcomes: mortality, postoperative major and minor complications, discharge disposition, readmission and reoperation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and operative time. RESULTS: No difference in mortality was encountered between SHS and CMN (p = 0.440). Compared to CMN, the SHS cohort had an 11.6% decreased likelihood of a minor complication (p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between CMN and SHS for major complications (p = 0.117). SHS patients were less likely to have transfusion (p < 0.001), DVT (p = 0.007), and MI (0.024). SHS patients were 12.5% more likely to go home (p = 0.002). No association was discovered between being treated with a SHS and reoperation (p = 0.449) and readmission (p = 0.588). SHS patients had almost a quarter of a day longer LOS (p = 0.041). Patients treated with SHS had a statistically significant (p < 0.001), but clinically irrelevant 2-min longer procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Early post-operative outcomes of plate versus nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures.

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to measure early postoperative outcomes of plate vs. nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years who underwent plate or nail fixation for low-energy humeral shaft fractures between 2005-2016 were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Multivariable regression was used to compare postoperative outcomes using propensity score adjustment to account for differences between fixation groups. Variables included in the propensity score were age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, hypertension, steroid use, cancer, functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and sex. RESULTS: Plate fixation was used in 1418 patients (70.6%), while nail fixation was used in 591 (29.4%). Patients undergoing nail fixation were more likely to be older, have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and have comorbidities. Mean operative time was statistically longer in the plate fixation group (130 +/-62 min vs. 102 +/-54 min). After propensity score adjustment, type of fixation was not a significant predictor of major or minor complications, length of stay, or readmission. However, nail fixation was a significant predictor of mortality following propensity score adjustment (OR 3.15, 95% Confidence interval 1.26-7.85). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing intramedullary nail fixation tended to be older patients with more comorbidities, suggesting that surgeons are selecting nail fixation in patients who may not be ideal surgical candidates. Although LOS, complications, and readmission rates were higher in the nail group, this difference was not statistically significant following propensity score adjustment. However, nail fixation remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality following adjustment. This suggests that nail fixation may not be a safer surgical option in patients with multiple medical co-morbidities and low-energy humeral shaft fractures.

The Impact of Hemodialysis on Mortality and Personal Independence After Hip Fracture. A Prospective Matched Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cumulative 30-day and 1-year mortality as well as personal independence after hip fracture in patients on hemodialysis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study with matched controls. SETTING: One teaching hospital, one metropolitan trauma center, one peripheral hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Study group: a consecutive cohort of 64 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving chronic hemodialysis who had undergone surgery for a trochanteric or femoral neck fracture from June 2008 to November 2016. CONTROL GROUP: subjects without end-stage renal disease who underwent surgery for similar hip fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: One-year mortality, activities of daily living, and ambulatory activity. RESULTS: The 30-day and 1-year mortality rate in patients with a hip fracture undergoing hemodialysis was 25.0% and 57.8%, respectively. Hemodialysis was independently associated with increased 30-day (Hazard ratio 2.933; 95% confidence interval 1.270-6.770; P = 0.018) and 1-year (hazard ratio 2.535; 95% confidence interval, 1.494-4.299; P < 0.001) mortality compared with the matched controls. At the 1-year follow-up, loss of personal independence in comparison with the prefracture status was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis was associated with increased mortality after hip fracture. A worse prefracture functional status predicted the loss of functional independence at follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Higher 30-day mortality associated with the use of intramedullary nails compared with sliding hip screws for the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures: a prospective national registry study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the type of operation used to treat a trochanteric fracture of the hip and 30-day mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 82 990 patients from the National Hip Fracture Database were analyzed using generalized linear models with incremental case-mix adjustment for patient, non-surgical and surgical characteristics, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: The use of short and long intramedullary nails was associated with an increase in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.125, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.040 to 1.218; p = 0.004) compared with the use of sliding hip screws (12.5% increase). If this were causative, it would represent 98 excess deaths over the four-year period of the study and one excess death would be caused by treating 112 patients with an intramedullary nail rather than a sliding hip screw. CONCLUSION: There is a 12.5% increase in the risk of 30-day mortality associated with the use of an intramedullary nail compared with a sliding hip screw in the treatment of a trochanteric fractures of the hip.

Geriatric distal femoral fractures: A retrospective study of 30 day mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Distal femoral fractures have many of the same challenges as hip fractures, but there has been limited research into outcomes following these. The aim of this study was to assess 30 day mortality following distal femoral fractures in comparison to hip fractures presenting to a single institution Secondary outcomes included risk factors for mortality, post-operative complications and union. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all distal femoral fragility fractures in patients over 65, and hip fractures over a 5 year period at a single institution. RESULTS: 88 distal femoral fractures and 2837 hip fractures fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the distal femoral fractures there were 80 females and 8 males with a mean age of 82.4 (range 65-103). The mean age of the hip fractures was 83.7 (range 65-106) and there were 2066 females and 771 males. The overall 30 day mortality for hip fractures was 7.7% and was 9.1% for distal femoral fractures. The risk ratio was 1.1777(95% CI 0.6009-2.3080) (p = 0.6338). There was no significant difference in 30 day mortality between the two fracture types. Of the 88 distal femoral fractures 75 (85.2%) underwent open reduction internal fixation, 5 (5.7%) intramedullary nail and 8 (9.1%) conservative treatment. 11.4% suffered a medical complication. 9.1% patients required at least 1 further surgical procedure. The union rate was 94.3%. The 1 year mortality was 34.1%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in 30 day mortality between distal femoral and hip fractures. Distal femoral fractures occur in a complex group of patients that is similar to hip fractures. They have high mortality and complication rates.

Pre-operative factors associated with increased mortality in elderly patients with a hip fracture: A cohort study in a developing country.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a public health problem worldwide, and several factors are involved with post-operative mortality. The aim of this study was to identify the pre-operative factors associated with increased mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures in a developing country during the first post-operative year. METHODS: An ambidirectional cohort study was conducted with patients ≥ 65 years of age who underwent hip surgery due to a hip fracture caused by a fall from a standing position. Socio-demographic data, time to surgery, and comorbidities measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were recorded. One-year mortality from all causes was the primary outcome, and 30-day and 6-month mortality were the secondary outcomes. Log-rank test was used to evaluate survival, and Cox's proportional hazard regression was used to detect the factors associated with increased mortality. RESULTS: 478 patients who underwent hip surgery were included in this study. The mean age was 80.2 ±â€¯9.9, and 297 (62%) were females. There were 150 (31.4%) deaths at the end of the first follow-up year, and the mean of surgical delay was 8.8 days ±â€¯6.4. Patients who underwent surgery during the first 4 days (Log-rank test < 0.001) after hip fracture occurred and patients with a CCI ≤ 2 (Log-rank test < 0.001) showed better survival (90%), comparing to mortality (52%) of patients with a CCI ≥ 3 and surgical delay > 4 days. The age ≥ 80 years (Hazard ratio 2.55 (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70 to 3.84, p < 0.001), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.26, p 0.006), surgical delay > 4 days (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.38-4.21, p 0.006), and haemoglobin < 10 g/dl (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.15, p 0.02) were associated with increased 1-year mortality. In addition, 30-day mortality was associated with age ≥ 80 years (HR 4.15, 95% CI 1.98-8.70, p < 0.001), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.08-2.99, p 0.023), pre-surgical time >48 h (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.58-5.92, p 0.001), and surgical delay > 4 days (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.33-6.81, p 0.008); and 6-month mortality was associated with surgical delay > 4 days (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.42-5.23, p 0.003), and haemoglobin < 10 g/dl (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.33, p < 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical delay greater than 4 days and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 were found as factors associated with increased mortality, along with anaemia < 10 g/dl and age ≥ 80 years. A similar mortality rate was found in this study compared to the rates reported by the literature, despite a surgical delay of 8.8 days.

General versus spinal anaesthesia in proximal femoral fracture surgery - treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health problem because of the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the general population. The mode of choice for anaesthesia in surgical treatment of these fractures is still debated in terms of better postoperative outcome. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of general over spinal anaesthesia on mortality in proximal femoral fracture surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 115 patients aged at least 70 years who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture. The survey was conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2015 at the General Hospital Karlovac, Croatia. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - general anaesthesia and group 2 - spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the effect of mode of anaesthesia, general versus spinal, on mortality within 30 days, six months and one year after surgery. RESULTS: General anaesthesia (EndoTracheal Anaesthesia) was administered in 77 patients (67%; group I - ETA) and spinal anaesthesia in 38 patients (33%; group 2 - SPIN). Both groups had more female than male patients: 69 patients (89.6%) in the ETA group and 32 patients (84.2%) in the SPIN group were female. The mean age in the ETA group was 82.91 years and in the SPIN group was 80.18 years. ASA II status was more common in patients in the SPIN group (25 patients [65.8%]). The average time from hospitalisation to surgery was 53.44 hours in the ETA group and 53.33 hours in the SPIN group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of comorbidities, or intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Mortality after surgery in the ETA and SPIN groups, respectively, was as follows: 10.4% and 10.5% at 30 days, 23.4% and 15.8% at six months, and 32.5% and 31.6% at one year. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the mode of anaesthesia (general vs spinal) has no effect on postoperative mortality, and that the mode of anaesthesia should be applied on an individual basis in correlation with associated comorbidities.

No association between surgical delay and mortality following distal femoral fractures. A study from the danish fracture database collaborators.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether surgical delay or the educational level of surgeon is associated with early mortality in patients with distal femoral fractures. METHODS: 392 consecutive patients aged ≥50 years registered in the Danish Fracture Database for surgery of a non-pathological, closed, low-energy distal femoral fracture (AO33A-C) were included. Data included age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, type of fracture, educational level of surgeon and surgical delay. Educational level of surgeon was defined as "attending or above as surgeon", "attending or above as supervisor" or "below attending alone". Surgical delay was defined as hours (h) from radiological diagnostics until onset of surgery. Mortality data was provided by The Civil Registration System. Mortality rates were calculated using multiple logistical regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 76 years (range 50-101), 79% of patients were female and 65% had an extra articular fracture (AO33A). 8% were operated within 12h, 33% within 24h, 67% within 48h and 83% within 72h. Educational level of surgeon was "attending or above as surgeon" in 56% of all cases and "attending or above as supervisor" in 33%. Mortality was 7.1% at day 30 and 12.5% at day 90. The logistical regression analysis did not demonstrate any association between surgical delay or educational level of surgeon and mortality. Increasing age, male gender and ASA score >2 significantly increased both 30-day and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: No association between surgical delay or educational level of surgeon and mortality was found. These findings do not support the development of guidelines for decreasing surgical delay in this population.

The frail fail: Increased mortality and post-operative complications in orthopaedic trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: The burgeoning elderly population calls for a robust tool to identify patients with increased risk of mortality and morbidity. This paper investigates the utility of the MFI as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in orthopaedic trauma patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the NSQIP database to identify patients age 60 and above who underwent surgery for pelvis and lower extremity fractures between 2005 and 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each patient, an MFI score was calculated using NSQIP variables. The relationship between the MFI score and 30-day mortality and morbidity was determined using chi-square analysis. MFI was compared to age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and wound classifications in multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Study sample consisted of 36,424 patients with 27.8% male with an average age of 79.5 years (SD 9.3). MFI ranged from 0 to 0.82 with mean MFI of 0.12 (SD 0.09). Mortality increased from 2.7% to 13.2% and readmission increased from 5.5% to 18.8% with increasing MFI score. The rate of any complication increased from 30.1% to 38.6%. Length of hospital stay increased from 5.3days (±5.5days) to 9.1days (±7.2days) between MFI score 0 and 0.45+. There was a stronger association between 30-day mortality and MFI (aOR for MFI 0.45+: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9) compared to age (aOR for age: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.1-1.1) and ASA (aOR 2.5, 95% CI: 2.3-2.7). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: MFI was a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality in orthopaedic trauma patients. The use of MFI can provide an individualized risk assessment tool that can be used by an interdisciplinary team for perioperative counseling and to improve outcomes.

Surgical delay as a risk factor for wound infection after a hip fracture.

PURPOSE: Analysis of significant risk factors for mortality and for medical and orthopaedic complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational study of a prospective consecutive cohort of 697 patients diagnosed of hip fracture from December 2012 to December 2014. Average age was 85±9years and 520 were female (75%). Intracapsular fractures (308, 44%) were treated non-operatively, (19 patients), with cannulated screws (58) or with hip arthroplasty (228 bipolar, 3 total hip atrhoplasty). Extracapsular fractures (389, 56%) were reduced and fixed with 375 trochanteric nails and 14 sliding-hip-screw-plates. Patients were controlled clinically and radiographically in outpatient clinic after 1, 3, 6 and 12months. Bivariate analysis (Pearson, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon) was applied to study statistically significant relations, and Odds Ratio were calculated. RESULTS: Surgical delay reached 2.1±2.2days, 1.7±1.9 in medically stable patients. Main reason for delay was anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy. Immediate weight-bearing was begun for 72% of patients. Average time in-hospital was 12±8days and 63% returned to previous environment. Lost-to-follow-up reached 4% after 1month and 8% after 6months. After 1year, 6% of previously-walking patients were unable to walk. Mortality reached 4% while in-hospital and 14% after 1year, with older age as only significant risk factor (p=0.004), OR=1.9. Wound infection developed in 2.3% of the series, and surgical delay longer than 24hours was a significant risk factor (p=0.023), with an OR=3.48 (1.1-10.8). Fixation failed in 7.9% of cannulated screws and 1.9% of trochanteric nails (1.1% cut-out, 0.8% nail fracture), while 2.7% of arthroplasty patients suffered a prosthesis dislocation and 1.3% a periprosthetic fracture. Pyelonephritis appeared in 6.7%, pneumonia in 6.3% and cardiac failure in 2.2% of patients; significant risk factors were previous comorbidity for pneumonia (p=0.007) (OR=2.7) and cardiac failure (p=0.007) (OR=9.7), as well as older age (p=0.006) (OR=2.2) for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical delay longer than 24hours has been an important risk factor for wound infection, a finding not previously described in literature. Older age is a significant risk factor for mortality and pneumonia, and previous comorbidity for cardiac failure and pneumonia.

The difference in activity of daily living (ADL) and mortality in patients aged over 80 years with femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty or osteosynthesis at 2 years of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the elderly and outcomes following hip fracture have been the focus of several studies over recent decades. Among all types of fall-related injuries, hip fractures cause the greatest number of deaths, lead to severe health problems and reduce quality of life. Improving the outcome of hip fracture surgery has thus become one of the main areas of interest for orthopaedic surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in activity of daily living (ADL) and mortality between patients aged over 80 years with hip fracture treated with osteosynthesis versus prosthesis at 2 years of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data were collected on admission and during in-hospital stay. Information recorded on admission included: age, sex, type and mechanism of fracture, functional and cognitive status, comorbidity, and severity of illness. Prefracture functional status was measured. The follow-up was clinical and radiographical, or was by telephone for patients who were not able to come to the clinic. Patients aged over 80 years who underwent a single surgical procedure treated with intramedullary nail or hemiarthroplasty were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients (45 male and 129 female) were included in the study. The two treatment groups were comparable for all preoperative parameters except for preoperative haemoglobin, which was an average of 1g/dl higher in the patients given hemiarthroplasty compared with those treated with intramedullary nail (t-test: p<0.05). The average observation period was 594.99days; the number of deaths was 62 of 164 contacted patients, and the survival rate at 2 years was 62.2%. There was increased mortality in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (Log-rank Mantel-Cox, p: 0,048). The difference in ADL between preoperative and follow-up is not statistically significant between the two groups. DISCUSSION: In the literature, there are few specific studies that consider these parameters in this population. However, these findings are consistent with the findings from other studies. CONCLUSION: Patients who received hemiarthroplasty have a higher mortality risk than those treated with intramedullary nail; there are no differences in ADL at follow-up.

Prognostic factors for mortality after hip fracture: Operation within 48 hours is mandatory.

The aim of this study was to assess whether surgery delay and other variables are associated with an increased mortality rate after surgical treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. Patients treated for a proximal femoral fracture at our Orthopaedic Department between 2005 and 2012 were included in this study. A logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between mortality rate at different follow-up times (30 days, six months and one year) and different patient or treatment variables. A total of 1448 consecutive patients with 1558 proximal femoral fractures (55 bilateral) were enrolled in this study (mean age 80.3 years, 75.8% female). The postoperative mortality rate was 4% at 30 days, 14.1% at six months, and 18.8% at one year after surgery. Logistic regression revealed an increased mortality at all the endpoints in patients affected by more than two co-morbidities (respectively OR30-day=2.003, OR6-month=1.8654 and OR1-year=1.5965). Male sex was associated with an increased six-month (OR=1.7158) and one-year (OR=1.9362) mortality. Patients aged under 74 years had a decreased mortality at all endpoints (OR30-day=0.0703, OR6-month=0.2191 and OR1-year=0.2486). In this study, the surgery delay influenced mortality at one-year follow-up: operating within 48hours was associated with a decreased mortality rate (OR=0.7341; p=0.0392). Additionally, the patients who were operated on within 72hours were specifically analysed to understand if the option of 'operating within day 3' was acceptable. In the logistic regression, operating between 48 and 72hours was not reported as a risk factor for mortality, both compared to early surgery (within 48 hours) and to late surgery (after 72hours). This study showed that age, sex and number of co-morbidities influenced both early and late mortality in patients affected by proximal hip fractures. Early surgery influenced late mortality, with a decreased risk in patients operated on within 48hours. The option of operating within day 3 is not a valid alternative.

Early intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures in patients with severe thoracic trauma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Early intramedullary nailing (IMN) within the first 24 h for multiply injured patients with femoral fracture and concomitant thoracic trauma is controversial. Previously published studies have been limited in size and their outcomes have been inconclusive. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the available data in order to guide care and help improve the outcomes for these patients. METHODS: We searched the literature up to December 2011 in the main medical search engines and identified 6 retrospective cohort studies that explored the safety of early IMN in patients with both femoral fracture and chest injury. Our primary outcome was the rates of pulmonary complication (pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, fat embolism syndrome), multiple organ failure (MOF) and mortality. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in the rate of pulmonary complications, MOF or mortality in the patients treated with early IMN. CONCLUSION: Early IMN for femoral fractures does not increase the mortality and morbidity in chest- injured patients in the studies analyzed.

Costs and Complications of Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of OTA 31-A2 Proximal Femur Fractures in U.S. Veterans.

OBJECTIVES: In fractures without subtrochanteric extension, the indications for the use of short versus long cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for intertrochanteric femur fractures are unclear. We hypothesized that long nails would be associated with higher costs and similar complication rates. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving CMNs for OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures from 2001 to 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Costs, perioperative complications, readmissions, surgical failures, and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 262 patients with OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures (125 treated with short CMNs and 137 treated with long CMNs). The 2 cohorts had similar demographic and medical characteristics. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, readmissions within 30 days, surgical failures within one year, or death within 30 days or one year. The average cost of hospitalization was significantly higher for the cohort treated with long nails (greater than $7000 in actual costs, and greater than $3000 when statistically adjusted for differences in postoperative lengths of stay). Multivariable analyses showed no significant differences in the rates of development of at least one complication, readmission, or death. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with similar characteristics and fracture patterns, the use of long CMNs was associated with similar rates of complications, readmission, and reoperations, but significantly higher costs than with the use of short nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Preliminary results of the treatment of proximal femoral fractures with the AFFIXUS nail.

Contemporary fixation of the proximal femur is performed utilising a number of implants adopting different concepts and techniques. Cephalomedullary nails in particular represent one of two main options, the other being dynamic hip screw (DHS). The aim of this cohort study is to present the early experience of two large units from different countries of the use of the AFFIXUS nail for stabilisation of proximal femoral fractures. Over a period of almost three years, data from 476 proximal femoral fractures were collected and analysed using a specific research protocol, assessing data relevant to basic demographic details, in-hospital stay, surgical technique and post discharge outcomes with a minimum follow up of 6 months. Both the short and long versions of the nail were used in both centres, however, with some statistically significant differences as far as the type of fractures stabilised with the nail, which also translated to differences in the combination or not of 2 lag screws, and the static or dynamic mode of the proximal fixation construct. Other areas of difference amongst the 2 units, were the length of hospital stay and return of patients to their pre-injury residence, most likely reflecting the different social circumstances between the 2 countries. Overall mortality at a median follow up period of 17 months (range 6 to 35) was limited to 6.3%, nonunion and cut out rates 2.7%, whilst revision surgery occurred in just 2.5%. Over the first 6 months of follow up 63.6% returned to their pre-injury ambulatory status and 90.5% to their pre-injury residence. Further studies and higher level of scientific evidence is needed to verify the findings of this retrospective cohort study as to the effectiveness and safety of this new cephalomedullary nail.

Time to Surgery Is Associated with Thirty-Day and Ninety-Day Mortality After Proximal Femoral Fracture: A Retrospective Observational Study on Prospectively Collected Data from the Danish Fracture Database Collaborators.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that undergoing surgery as soon as possible reduces early mortality in patients with a proximal femoral fracture. Our aim was to evaluate the association between surgical delay and early mortality in these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Danish Fracture Database and the Civil Registration System on patients who were fifty years of age or older and had undergone surgery for a proximal femoral fracture. Femoral head fracture (classified as OTA/AO 31C per the OTA/AO classification system), high-energy trauma, pathological fractures, multiple fractures, and surgeries performed with implants not commonly used were excluded. End points were adjusted odds ratios for thirty-day and ninety-day mortality. RESULTS: For the 3517 surgeries included in this study, the median patient age was 82.0 years (range, fifty-one to 107 years), 2458 patients (70%) were female, and 1720 surgeries (49%) were performed because of a trochanteric fracture. Within twelve hours, 722 of the surgeries (21%) had been performed; within twenty-four hours, 2482 surgeries (71%); within thirty-six hours, 3024 surgeries (86%); within forty-eight hours, 3242 surgeries (92%); and within seventy-two hours, 3353 surgeries (95%). Unsupervised surgeons with an education level below that of an attending surgeon performed the surgery in 1807 (51%) of all cases. The thirty-day mortality was 380 (10.8%) and the ninety-day mortality was 612 (17.4%). The risk of thirty-day mortality increased with a surgical delay of more than twelve hours (odds ratio, 1.45; p = 0.02), more than twenty-four hours (odds ratio, 1.34; p = 0.02), and more than forty-eight hours (odds ratio, 1.56; p = 0.02); the risk of ninety-day mortality increased with a surgical delay of more than twenty-four hours (odds ratio, 1.23; p = 0.04). An education level of the surgeon below that of an attending surgeon increased the risk of thirty-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.28; p = 0.035) and ninety-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.26; p = 0.016). Increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists score and male sex significantly increased both thirty-day and ninety-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a surgical delay of more than twelve hours significantly increased the adjusted risk of thirty-day mortality and a surgical delay of more than twenty-four hours significantly increased the adjusted risk of ninety-day mortality. The adjusted risk of both thirty-day and ninety-day mortality increased significantly when the education level of the surgeon was below that of an attending surgeon. The study findings challenge orthopaedic departments to facilitate fast surgical treatment supported by attending orthopaedic surgeons.

Do intramedullary implants improve survival in elderly patients with trochanteric fractures? A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: There is currently no consensus regarding superiority of the intramedullary fixation over the sliding hip screw. Regional variation remains high and not backed up by solid evidence. Given these premises we aimed to analyze weather implant preference can influence the postoperative survival. Secondary objectives were determining the trend for implant choice and confounding factors associated with intramedullary nails compared to sliding hip screws. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data was obtained from patient charts with the main diagnosis of extracapsular/ trochanteric fractures, corresponding to ICD S72.1 codes. Between 2008-2012, 441 patients underwent osteosynthesis with a dynamic hip screw and 155 with intramedullary nail respectively. The living status was determined by comparing the patient identification number against the national population evidence records. RESULTS: The lifetable shows similar survival for both implants over the 5 year period. The yearly mortality was 19.4% for the dynamic hip screw and 21.8% for the intramedullary implant respectively, even though the later were used predominantly in older patients. This age difference is significant according to both parametric and non-parametric tests whereas duration of hospital stay are similar. We found a clear increase in the proportion of intramedullary implants, for a total of 11.2% over the 5 year period. There is no difference for the one year mortality and overall survival between sliding screw plates and intramedullary constructs. CONCLUSIONS: A clear increase in the use of intramedullary implants for trochanteric fractures was observed. This is even more apparent for older ages, presumably due to an higher surgeon confidence with the biomechanical stability of the intramedullary constructs.