Predictors of lower health-related quality of life after operative repair of diaphyseal femur fractures in a low-resource setting.

BACKGROUND: Little data exists on the negative impact of orthopaedic trauma on quality of life (QOL) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The goal of this study is to investigate the factors associated with lower QOL after operative fixation of femoral shaft fractures in adult patients in a low-resource setting. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed 272 factures in adults undergoing operative fixation for diaphyseal femur fractures at Tanzania. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment modalities, and functional outcomes up to 1-year post-operatively were evaluated for association with 1-year post-operative EQ-5D QOL scores via univariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: EQ-5D values were significantly lower at 1 year than at baseline (0.941 vs 0.991, p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Operative fixation of femoral shaft fractures in LMICs results in return to near baseline QOL. Demographic and treatment factors were not significantly associated with EQ-5D. and several markers of recovery were associated with lower 1 year QOL, including pain, knee stiffness, delayed radiographic healing, complications requiring reoperation. Efforts to reduce perioperative complications may help improve post-operative QOL.

Long term self esteem assessment after height increase by lengthening and then nailing.

The purpose of the study is to assess the long term psychosocial functioning after height increase, using the external fixation then nailing method. Rosenberg Self-esteem scale and a questionnaire to assess social functioning were completed by 28 patients both preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 7 years. The mean total score of RSE self-esteem for the 28 patients before lengthening was 21.5 (SD 1.03) (20-24). The mean total score of RSE for the patients 1 year after lengthening was 22 (SD 1.17) (20-24) with highly significant difference (p = 0.002).The mean total RSE self-esteem score after 7 years was 21.7 (SD 1.12) (21-25) with no significant difference (p = 0.11) Improvement was an evident in the short term self esteem after 1 year of follow up of the patients with height increase. On the other hand, there was an evident deterioration in the long term psychosocial evaluation during follow up after 7 years of height increase, returning to near pre-operative levels of self esteem.

Does Participation in a Randomized Clinical Trial Change Outcomes? An Evaluation of Patients Not Enrolled in the SPRINT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which knowledge from clinical trial protocols is transferred to nonparticipating patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a large clinical trial. SETTING: Six level-1 international trauma centers. METHODS: We compared rates and timing of reoperation in a subset of patients enrolled in the Study to Prospectively evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) to concurrent patients who were eligible but not enrolled. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected trial data. The records of 6 of the original SPRINT centers were searched for non-SPRINT patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of a closed tibial fracture. The rate and timing of reoperation were compared. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen non-SPRINT patients were compared with 328 patients enrolled in SPRINT from those same sites. There were 7 reoperations (6.1%) in non-SPRINT patients versus 18 (5.2%) in SPRINT patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 3.13; P = 0.811]. There was no difference in the time to reoperation between the SPRINT and non-SPRINT patients (6.2 vs. 6.8 months, 95% CI of the difference -3.8 to 2.6; P = 0.685) or in the proportion of patients who underwent reoperation before 6 months (29% vs. 43%; OR 1.75; 95% CI 0.18 to 15.41; P = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: Patients not enrolled in SPRINT had similarly low rates of reoperation for nonunion, and the average time to reoperation for both groups was longer than 6 months. A 6-month waiting period may have allowed slow-to-heal fractures adequate time to heal, thereby reducing the rate of diagnosis of nonunion. As such, this waiting period could contribute to lower-than-expected reoperation rates for nonunion. It is possible that clinical trials may beneficially influence the care of nonenrolled patients.

Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effect of reaming on 1-year 36-item short-form general health survey (SF-36) and short musculoskeletal function assessment (SMFA) scores from the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in patients with Tibial Fractures. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.1319 patients were randomized to reamed or unreamed nails. Fractures were categorized as open or closed. SETTING: Twenty-nine academic and community health centers across the US, Canada, and the Netherlands. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One thousand three hundred and nineteen skeletally mature patients with closed and open diaphyseal tibia fractures. INTERVENTION: Reamed versus unreamed tibial nails. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: SF-36 and the SMFA. Outcomes were obtained during the initial hospitalization to reflect preinjury status, and again at the 2-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. Repeated measures analyses were performed with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There were no differences between the reamed and unreamed groups at 12 months for either the SF-36 physical component score [42.9 vs. 43.4, P = 0.54, 95% Confidence Interval for the difference (CI) -2.1 to 1.1] or the SMFA dysfunction index (18.0 vs. 17.6, P = 0.79. 95% CI, -2.2 to 2.9). At one year, functional outcomes were significantly below baseline for the SF-36 physical componentf score, SMFA dysfunction index, and SMFA bothersome index (P < 0.001). Time and fracture type were significantly associated with functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Reaming does not affect functional outcomes after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures. Patients with open fractures have worse functional outcomes than those with a closed injury. Patients do not reach their baseline function by 1 year after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is preoperative state anxiety a risk factor for postoperative delirium among elderly hip fracture patients?

AIM: To determine if preoperative state anxiety is a risk factor for postoperative delirium in older hip fracture patients. METHODS: A secondary data analysis comprising data from a prospective non-randomized trial including 86 patients with a hip fracture aged 65 years and older was carried out. State anxiety was measured preoperatively using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Delirium and its severity was measured pre- and postoperatively (day 1, 3, 5, 8) by trained research nurses using the Confusion Assessment Method and Delirium Index. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (27.9%) developed delirium postoperatively. Preoperative state anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) was not associated with postoperative delirium (rb = 0.135, P = 0.353), duration of postoperative delirium (rho = 0.038, P = 0.861) or severity of postoperative delirium (rho = 0.153, P = 0.160). Independent predictors of postoperative delirium were lower MMSE scores (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.95, P = 0.015), osteosynthesis surgery (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.02-13.15, P = 0,047) and lowest intraoperative diastolic blood pressure (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: No relationship between state anxiety and postoperative delirium was found, but significant methodological hurdles were observed and discussed providing important groundwork for further research in this area. Further research should focus on reliable measurement of state anxiety in cognitively impaired older populations. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 948-955.

Minimal invasive long PHILOS®-plate osteosynthesis in metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus.

Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) not only meets the criteria of a "biological" osteosynthesis by minimising invasivity as well as iatrogenic soft tissue damage, but can also provide adequate stability for fracture healing and early functional aftertreatment. Up to date, only few publications report on MIPO of humeral shaft fractures mainly using the anterolateral deltopectoral approach for proximal plate insertion. Objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility and clinical outcome of MIPO for metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus through a lateral approach using angular stable long PHILOS(®)-plates. We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients (mean age 77 years, range 48-95 years) with displaced metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus treated with MIPO technique. For the first time, an angular stable long PHILOS(®)-plate through a lateral deltoid-split approach proximally and a brachialis/brachioradialis intermuscular approach with exposure of the radial nerve distally, were used. There were no infections and no iatrogenic injuries to the axillary and radial nerve. One patient showed subacromial impingement and one patient had to be reoperated for redislocation of the distal fragment with screw breakage, which was most likely due to incorrect screw placement. This patient was successfully operated using the same method and implant. Besides one patient who refused further follow-up, 28 patients could be followed up to a mean of 8 months (range 3-12 months) each with an entirely healed fracture. Furthermore, patient's quality of life was documented using the SF-36 questionnaire. Comparison with published United States normative data showed no significant deficits in the physical as well as in the mental domains 8 months after MIPO. Minimal invasive long PHILOS(®)-plate osteosynthesis using a combined lateral deltoid-split and brachialis/brachioradialis intermuscular approach proved to be a safe procedure for the treatment of metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus with low morbidity and full restoration of quality of life in these elderly patients.

Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) to predict the postoperative risk for hip fracture in elder patients.

INTRODUCTION: The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system is comprised of a preoperative risk score (PRS), a surgical stress score (SSS), and a comprehensive risk score (CRS) determined by both the PRS and SSS. E-PASS predicts the postoperative risk by quantifying the patient's reserve and surgical stress in general surgery. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of this scoring system for the hospitalization outcomes in hip fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 419 elderly patients who underwent surgery with osteosynthesis or arthroplasty for hip fracture were prospectively assessed for the E-PASS scoring system, which was compared with their postoperative course. RESULTS: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in hospital increased linearly as the PRS and CRS increased, with significant correlation (rho = 0.2, P < 0.01) in both operations. The cost of hospital stay also related significantly to the SSS (r = 0.6, P < 0.0001) and CRS (r = 0.4, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that E-PASS may be useful for predicting postoperative risk and estimating medical expense for surgical cases with hip fracture.

Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. A retrospective study of 126 cases.

Antegrade intramedullary nailing with four different implants was used in 126 humeral shaft fractures. There were 74 acute fractures, 17 pathologic fractures, 16 fractures malaligned in a hanging cast or brace, 15 fractures with delayed union and 4 fractures that were nailed after failed open reduction and internal fixation. The nonunion rate was 21/95 after primary operation, and after reoperations 14/95. Distraction of the fracture was a significant cause of nonunion, but not type of fracture, localization, implant, and delay between injury and surgery. Shoulder joint function was significantly impaired in 25/67 patients. The patients regarded the result as good or satisfactory in 41/67 of the cases who were followed mean 3 (0.5-10) years. We conclude that antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures leads to a substantial risk of non-union and impairment of shoulder function. It can be recommended as primary treatment only when nonoperative treatment is likely to fail.