Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 192
Filtrar
1.
Orthopedics ; 44(3): 142-147, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34039217

RESUMO

Open fracture is a risk factor for nonunion of diaphyseal tibia fractures. Compared with closed injuries, there is a relative lack of scientific knowledge regarding the healing of open tibia fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate which patient, injury, and surgeon-related factors predict nonunion in open tibial shaft fractures. A cohort of 98 patients with 104 extra-articular open tibial shaft fractures (OTA/AO 41A2-3, 42A-C, and 43A) were treated surgically between 2007 and 2018 at a single level 1 trauma center and were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent irrigation and debridement followed by definitive intramedullary nailing or plate fixation. Patient, injury, and perioperative prognostic factors were analyzed as predictors of nonunion based on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The nonunion rate was 27.9% (n=29). There were 12 occurrences of deep infection (11.5%). The median follow-up was 14 months. High-energy mechanism of injury (hazard ratio [HR], 5.76), Gustilo-Anderson class IIIA injury (HR, 3.66), postoperative cortical continuity of 0% to 25% (HR, 2.90), early postoperative complication (HR, 4.20), and deep infection (HR, 2.25) were significant predictors of nonunion on univariable analysis (P<.05). On multivariable assessment, only high-energy mechanism of injury, Gustilo-Anderson class IIIA injury, and early postoperative complication reached significance as predictors of nonunion. These data also indicate that lack of cortical continuity is a significant univariable radiographic predictor of nonunion. This is potentially modifiable, may guide surgeons in selecting patients for early bone grafting procedures, and should be assessed carefully in this high-risk population. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):142-147.].


Assuntos
Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Radiografia , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Kurume Med J ; 65(4): 177-183, 2020 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31723082

RESUMO

The treatment of Gustilo type IIIB and IIIC open fractures remains a challenging problem, because the infection rate is 15-45%. Infection can lead to serious complications such as osteomyelitis or amputation. The intra-wound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment (IW-CONPIT) was developed for infected wounds and intractable ulcers, and is very effective in suppressing infection and accelerating wound healing. Here the IW-CONPIT was applied to severe open fractures for the purpose of preventing infection. After thorough debridement and lavage of the wound, bony stabilization is performed by external fixation. Dermal matrix is grafted onto any areas where the bone or tendon is exposed. A sponge containing two tubes is placed over the entire surface of the wound including the dermal matrix. Then it is covered with a film dressing to make the wound completely airtight. A bottle of physiologic saline solution is attached to one tube, and a continuous aspirator is attached to the other. This system maintains negative pressure on the wound surface, which is continuously irrigated. Thirty-five patients were treated with this method. A superficial infection developed in two cases but was resolved by additional debridement and continued application of IW-CONPIT. Complete wound healing was obtained with split thickness skin graft in all cases. There were no complications such as osteomyelitis, delayed bone union or amputation. IW-CONPIT was able to definitively prevent wound infection in Gustilo type ⅢB open fractures. We believe this method will become a standard treatment option for this condition.


Assuntos
Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/terapia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Osteomielite/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Irrigação Terapêutica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Criança , Desbridamento , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/efeitos adversos , Osteomielite/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Irrigação Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Injury ; 50(11): 2128-2135, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31530381

RESUMO

Reconstruction of a bone defect using the Masquelet induced membrane technique has been well described. However, there are few reports of arthrodesis using this technique. In this case report, we describe a modified Masquelet technique for ankle arthrodesis with nailing. The patient was a 32-year-old man who sustained an open fracture of the right ankle with a substantial osteochondral defect as a result of a fall. Immediately after the injury, a staged procedure using the Masquelet technique was planned. The bone defect was filled with bone cement in the acute stage, but replacement of the cement was needed 6 months after the injury because of a prolonged inflammatory reaction. Ten months after the injury, the bone cement was removed, and ankle arthrodesis was performed using an IM nail with a combination of autologous and artificial bone. As a modification of the Masquelet technique, the anterior surface of the transplant site was covered with a large but thin layer of cortical bone instead of suturing the incised membrane. At 1 year postoperatively, firm bony union was achieved and the implant was removed. At follow-up 3 years after his injury, the patient is able to walk, undertake physical work, and has no clinical signs of infection. Our experience suggests that a modified induced membrane technique may be useful when treating an open limb fracture with an extensive osteochondral defect where preservation of the joint is difficult and arthrodesis is considered.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Artrodese/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Osteomielite/prevenção & controle , Acidentes por Quedas , Adulto , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Transplante Ósseo , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Injury ; 50(11): 1944-1951, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447213

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Improved pain assessment and management in the emergency department (ED) is warranted. We aimed to determine the impact on pain management, of adding symptoms and signs to pain assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single center before-and-after study was conducted, supplemented by an interrupted time series analysis. The intervention included the addition of clinical presentation (CP) of the injury and facial expression (FE) of the patient to pain assessment scales of patients with soft tissue injures. Pain intensity was categorized as: mild, moderate, and severe. We compared types of pain relief medications, use of strong opioids, and pain relief efficacy between pre and post intervention phases. RESULTS: Before-and-after analysis revealed a significant reduction in the use of strong opioids. The adjusted relative ratio for the use of strong opioids in the post intervention phase was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.48-0.82). This reduction was mostly driven by less use of strong opioids in patients reporting severe pain (from 17.3%-7.9%) (P < 0.0001). A larger proportion of patients in the post intervention phase than in the pre intervention phase received weak opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (27.4% vs 19.1%, P = 0.002), and a larger proportion did not receive any pain relief medication (19.8% vs 10.5%, p < 0.0001). The use of strong opioids increased with higher levels of FE and CP. Among patients with mild injury and reporting severe pain, the odds of receiving a strong opioid was nearly 9 times (OR = 8.9, 95% CI: 4.0-19.6) higher among those who were with an unrelaxed FE and showed pain behavior than those with relaxed FE. Interrupted time-series analysis showed that the mean ΔVAS (VAS score at entry minus VAS score at discharge) in the post intervention phase compared with the pre intervention phase was not statistically significant (P = 0.073). The use of strong opioids in the post intervention phase was significantly reduced (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Adding symptoms and signs to pain assessment of patients admitted with soft tissue injuries decreased the use of strong opioids, without affecting pain relief efficacy.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fraturas Expostas/complicações , Dor/diagnóstico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois , Expressão Facial , Feminino , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/psicologia , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/instrumentação , Medição da Dor , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/fisiopatologia , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/psicologia , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto Jovem
5.
Chin J Traumatol ; 22(5): 270-273, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31443939

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Open tibia fracture is prone to infection, consequently causing significant morbidity and increasing the hospital stay, occupational loss and onset of chronic osteomyelitis. Intramedullary nailing is one choice for treating tibia shaft fractures. To improve the delivery of antibiotics at the tissue-implant interface, many methods have been proposed as a part of prophylaxis against infection. This study was conducted to study the role of gentamicin-impregnated intramedullary interlocking (IMIL) nail in the prevention of infection in Gustilo type I and II open tibia fractures and to compare the results with regular intramedullary nail. METHODS: The study included 28 patients with open tibia fractures (Gustilo type 1 or type 2); of them 14 underwent regular IMIL nailing and the other 14 were treated with gentamicin-coated nailing. Randomization was done by alternate allocation of the patients. Follow-up was done postoperatively (day 1), 1 week, 6 weeks, and 6 months for bone union, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin and C-reactive protein (CRP). Statistical significance was tested using unpaired t-test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 4 cases of infection in controls (regular IMIL nail) and no infection among patients treated with gentamicin-coated nail during the follow up (X2 = 4.66, p = 0.031). At 6 months postoperatively, CRP (p = 0.031), ESR (p = 0.046) and hemoglobin level (p = 0.016) showed significant difference between two groups. The bone healing rate was better with gentamicin-coated nail in comparison to regular IMIL nail at 6 months follow-up (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Gentamicin-coated IMIL nail has a positive role in preventing infection in Gustilo type I and II open tibia fractures.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Pinos Ortopédicos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Gentamicinas/administração & dosagem , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Seguimentos , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/classificação , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas da Tíbia/classificação , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Injury ; 50(11): 2097-2102, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371170

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Identify a glucose threshold that would put patients with isolated bicondylar tibial plateau fractures at risk of early wound infection (i.e. < 90 days). DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records. SETTING: Academic American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Adult patients between 2010 and 2015 with an operatively treated isolated bicondylar tibial plateau fracture and at least three glucose measurements during their hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: To predict infection using four different methods: maximum preoperative blood glucose (PBG), maximum blood glucose (MGB), Hyperglycemic Index (HGI), and Time-Weighted Average Glucose (TWAG). RESULTS: 126/381 patients met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen (12%) patients had an open fracture and 30/126 (23%) developed an infection. Median glucose for each predictive method studied was 114 (IQR 101.2-137.8) mg/dL for PBG, 144 (IQR 119-169.8) mg/dL for MBG, 0.8 (IQR 0.20-1.60) mmol/L for HGI, and 120.4 (IQR 106.0-135.6) mg/dL for TWAG. As expected, infected patients had higher PBG, MGB, and TWAG. HGI was similar in both groups. None of these differences prove to be statistically significant (p > .05). Logistic regression models for all the methods showed that having an open fracture was the strongest predictor of infection. CONCLUSION: It is well known that stress-induced hyperglycemia increases the risk of infection, we present and compare four models that have been used in other medical fields. In our study, none of the methods presented identified a glucose threshold that would increase the risk of infection in patients with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective review, Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Hiperglicemia/fisiopatologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/fisiopatologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Centros de Traumatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fraturas Expostas/sangue , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hiperglicemia/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/sangue , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/sangue , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Injury ; 50 Suppl 3: 32-39, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421817

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Non-union of a long bone fracture remains a challenge in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. In the current study, we sought to determine the clinical effectiveness of tibial non-union treatment utilizing an antibiotic-coated intramedullary nail (Expert Tibia Nail (ETN) PROtect®) regarding prevention and treatment of infection and the clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 36 patients suffering from tibial non-unions that were treated with the ETN PROtect® in the course of non-union treatment between February 2010 and March 2015 were included in this clinical observational study. Clinical and radiological examinations were performed preoperatively as well as 4, 6 and 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively as part of a standardized follow-up program. Data regarding perioperative complications, weight-bearing capacity, radiological signs of consolidation and subjective health status were assessed at each time point. Laboratory parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count were collected preoperatively in order to assess the patients' risk profile for infection. RESULTS: Patients had an average of 6.2 previous surgeries and 22 patients (61.1%) had a positive bacterial culture from intraoperatively removed tissue during the first operative treatment. 29 patients (80.6%) achieved full weight-bearing after an average of 7.7 months, furthermore 80.6% of patients achieved osseous consolidation. 3 deep infections occurred, including one amputation. Subjective health status increase based on the SF-12 questionnaire during our follow-up program. CONCLUSION: The results from the current study indicate that the use of the ETN PROtect® in the applied non-union therapy has a high clinical effectiveness regarding osseous consolidation and time to weight bearing. In addition, the use of gentamicin-coated nails in the treatment of tibial non-unions might contribute to both successful treatment of the underlying infection and prevention of perioperative infection. The gentamicin-coated nail may serve as a beneficial adjunct treatment in the applied non-union therapy in addition to all established techniques in the treatment of infected non-unions.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas não Consolidadas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Injury ; 50(11): 1790-1794, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31324342

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to identify patient and intra-operative factors that contribute to non-union in locked lateral plating for distal femoral fractures. METHODS: Systematic searches of English-language articles in Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were undertaken in February 2018 according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms were (fracture or fracture*) AND (distal femur or distal femoral) AND (malunion or non-union). Eligible studies published at any time reported non-union rates and compared patient and intraoperative factors in patients who underwent locked lateral plating for traumatic distal femoral fractures. The quality of included papers was assessed using The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery levels of evidence (Wright et al., 2003), and further appraised using the Downs and Black score (Downs and Black, 1998). RESULTS: Eight studies investigating 1380 distal femoral fractures were found to satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies analysed a variety of patient and intra-operative factors that may contribute to non-union. These include high BMI, open fracture, comminution, fracture infection, stainless steel plate material, shorter working length, open reduction and internal fixation when compared with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, high construct rigidity scores and purely locking screw constructs. CONCLUSION: This review has identified multiple factors which potentially contribute to non-union including stainless steel plate material, high construct rigidity scores and purely locking screw constructs. These findings may reflect that overly rigid plating constructs can contribute to non-union. However, they should be taken in the context of heterogeneity amongst included studies, with further research necessary to support these findings.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas não Consolidadas/etiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Placas Ósseas , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Cominutivas/complicações , Fraturas Cominutivas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/complicações , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Osteomielite/complicações , Osteomielite/fisiopatologia , Falha de Prótese
9.
Int Orthop ; 43(8): 1939-1950, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31093715

RESUMO

High-energy tibial pilon fractures continue to represent a significant challenge to the treating orthopaedic surgeon. Pre-operative evaluation includes a careful clinical assessment of the associated soft tissue injury, which frequently dictates surgical management. Staged surgical reconstruction remains the standard treatment protocol at most trauma centres. This includes application of a temporary spanning external fixator for approximately one to four weeks, followed by open reduction and internal fixation once the surrounding soft tissues are amendable. Despite careful soft tissue management protocols, the risk of wound complications continues to be relatively high compared to other orthopaedic trauma procedures. The functional long-term outcomes of these injuries remain limited, and recent data has emphasised that the majority of patients do not regain their pre-operative work status. In addition, the health-related quality of life scores fare poorly when compared to other orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic patient populations, and many patients develop post-traumatic arthritis within the tibiotalar joint. It has been shown that the quality of fracture reduction may significantly correlate with the long-term functional outcomes. While the orthopaedic community has come a long way with regard to safe management of high-energy tibial pilon fractures, the clinical outcomes continue to remain limited. In particular, the persistently high rates of wound complications and the limited functional long-term outcomes leave significant room for improvement. Future investigators may focus on further innovations to minimise the risk of wound complications. The surgical team may emphasise the quality of fracture reduction as an important treatment goal.


Assuntos
Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/instrumentação , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Humanos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Fraturas da Tíbia/classificação , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia
10.
Injury ; 50(10): 1731-1738, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31138484

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Open comminuted intraarticular distal femur fracture represents a formidable challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon for the inherent fracture complexity, soft tissue damage, and contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcome results and safety of using the Ilizarov fixator to treat these fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 22 fractures treated by debridement with reduction and stabilization by Ilizarov external fixator. The mean age was 35 years. Gustilo grade of open fracture was III-A (19 cases), III-B (2 cases), and III-C (1 case). Six fractures were AO-OTA type 33C2, and 16 cases were type 33C3. Eight patients had associated injuries. Bone and functional results were evaluated by Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and Neer knee score. The statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. RESULTS: Seven cases had autogenous bone grafting. The frame crossed the knee in 8 patients. The fixator was removed after a mean of 7 months with union in all cases, and without any malalignment >5°. Deep infection occurred in two cases. Quadriceps-plasty was needed for 3 cases. After a mean of 44 months, the last follow-up results showed full knee extension and a mean flexion of 107.59°. The ASAMI functional and bone results were good to excellent in all cases. Neer knee score averaged 86.59. CONCLUSIONS: Ilizarov fixator was an effective treatment modality of open comminuted distal femur fractures with high union rate, adequate alignment and satisfactory functional outcomes.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Técnica de Ilizarov , Adulto , Fixadores Externos , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Cominutivas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Injury ; 50(7): 1376-1381, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128908

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Open lower limb fractures can be devastating with outcomes determined by tissue damage and adherence to strictly defined care pathways. Managing such injuries in paediatric and elderly populations presents logistical and technical challenges to achieve best outcomes. Orthoplastic principles were developed mainly in the young adult population whereas requirements for paediatric and elderly patients need further understanding. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on two groups of patients at the extremes of age, with type IIIb (severe) open lower limb fractures, presenting to a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) with orthoplastic services over a six-year period - the first group being under 16 years; the second group being over 65. The timelines of combined surgery to both fix the fracture and flap the soft-tissue defect were strictly observed. Each group were followed-up for a minimum of nine months. Data were analysed according to patient demographics, mechanism of trauma, time to wound excision, time to definitive surgery, fixation technique, soft-tissue reconstruction type, deep infection rate, flap survival, bony union, secondary amputation and functional outcome (Enneking score). RESULTS: 33 paediatric patients and 99 elderly patients were identified. Paediatric: The median age was 12 years. All the children were ASA Grade I. Open tibial fractures were most common (76%) followed by ankle fracture dislocation (12%). The majority were high-energy injuries and were commonly managed with external fixators (or frames) and free flap coverage. Median hospital stay was 12 days, and time to union 114 days, with median Enneking scores of 85%. There was one flap failure and no deep infections. Elderly: The median age was 76 years. ASA grades varied and reflected multiple comorbidities. High-energy injuries required free flaps, while more common, low-energy fragility fractures were covered with loco-regional flaps. Internal fixation with intramedullary nails was most commonly used. Median hospital stay was 13 days, and time to union was 150 days, with median Enneking scores of 70%. There was one flap failure, one deep infection, and one delayed amputation. DISCUSSION: These results reflect both similarities and important differences in managing open fractures in the extremes of age. The specific challenges of each group of patients are discussed, including surgical aspects, but also the importance of orthoplastics infrastructure within the MTC and input from allied professionals to facilitate patient pathways.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/terapia , Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/terapia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Centros de Traumatologia , Adolescente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Desbridamento , Feminino , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/fisiopatologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 477(4): 813-820, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High-energy open forearm fractures are unique injuries frequently complicated by neurovascular and soft tissue injuries. Few studies have evaluated the factors associated with nonunion and loss of motion after these injuries, particularly in the setting of blast injuries. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) In military service members with high-energy open forearm fractures, what proportion achieved primary or secondary union? (2) What is the pronation-supination arc of motion as stratified by the presence or absence of heterotopic ossification (HO) and synostosis? (3) What are the risks of heterotopic ossification and synostosis? (4) What factors may be associated with forearm fracture nonunion? METHODS: A retrospective study of all open forearm fractures treated at a tertiary military referral center from January 2004 to December 2014 was performed. In all, 76 patients were identified and three were excluded, leaving 73 patients for inclusion. All 73 patients had serial radiographs to assess for HO and union. Only 64 patients had rotational range of motion (ROM) data. All patients returned to the operating room at least once after initial irrigation and débridement to ensure the soft tissue envelope was stable before definitive fixation. The indication for repeat irrigation and débridement was determined by clinical appearance. Patient demographics, fracture and soft tissue injury patterns, surgical treatments, neurovascular status at the time of injury, incidence of infection, heterotopic ossification (defined as the presence of heterotopic bone visible on serial radiographs), radioulnar synostosis, bony status after initial definitive treatment (union, nonunion, or amputation), and forearm rotation at final followup were retrospectively obtained from chart review by someone other than the operating surgeon. Seventy-six open forearm fractures in 76 patients were reviewed; 73 patients were examined for osseous union as three went on to early amputation, and 64 patients had forearm ROM data available for analysis. Union was determined by earliest radiology or orthopaedic staff official dictation stating the fracture was healed. Nonunion was defined as the clinical determination by the orthopaedist for a repeat procedure to achieve bony union. Secondary union was defined as union after reoperation to achieve bony union, and final union was defined as overall percentage of patients who were healed at final followup. Of the patients analyzed for union, 20 had less than 1 year of followup, and of these, none had nonunion. Of the patients analyzed for ROM, eight patients had less than 6 months of followup (range, 84-176 days). Of these, one patient had decreased ROM, none had a synostosis, and the remaining had > 140° of motion. RESULTS: Initial treatment resulted in primary union in 62 of 73 patients (85%); secondary union was achieved in eight of 11 patients (73%); and final union was achieved in 70 of 73 patients (96%). Although pronation-supination arc in patients without HO was 140° ± 35°, a limited pronation-supination arc was primarily associated with synostosis (arc: 40° ± 40°; mean difference from patients without HO: 103° [95% confidence interval {CI}, 77°-129°], p < 0.001); patients with HO but without synostosis had fewer limitations to ROM than those with synostosis (arc: 110° ± 80°, mean difference: 77° [35°-119°], p < 0.001). Heterotopic ossification developed in 40 of 73 patients (55%), including a radioulnar synostosis in 14 patients (19%). Bone loss at the fracture site (relative risk (RR) 6.2; 95% CI, 1.8-21) and healing complicated by infection (RR, 9.9; 95% CI, 4.9-20) were associated with the development of nonunion after initial treatment. Other potential factors such as smoking status, vascular injury, both-bone involvement, need for free flap coverage and blast mechanism were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high-energy mechanism of injury and high rate of soft tissue defects, the ultimate probability of fracture union in our series was high with a low infection risk. Nonunions were associated with bone loss and deep infection. Functional motion was achieved in most patients despite increased burden of HO and synostosis compared with civilian populations. However, if synostosis did not develop, HO itself did not appear to interfere with functional ROM. Future investigations may provide improved decision-making tools for timing of fixation and prophylactic means against HO synostosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Assuntos
Traumatismos por Explosões/cirurgia , Traumatismos do Antebraço/cirurgia , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/fisiopatologia , Medicina Militar , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosões/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos por Explosões/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Traumatismos do Antebraço/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Antebraço/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Ossificação Heterotópica/fisiopatologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sinostose/etiologia , Sinostose/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Guerra , Adulto Jovem
13.
Injury ; 50(3): 764-769, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30670320

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Femur fractures due to bomb explosions and gunshots in battlefield require osseous stabilization as quickly as possible to expedite emergent conditions. Immediate external fixation is the initial procedure as usual with planned early conversion to definitive treatment. The purpose of the current study is to determine the results of the early retrograde intramedullary nailing in combat-related injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with comminuted supracondylar femur fractures, initially treated with external fixation followed by planned conversion to retrograde intramedullary nailing in a one-stage procedure, were evaluated in a retrospective review to gather demographic, injury, management, and fracture-healing data for analysis. RESULTS: According to the system of Gustilo Anderson and Orthopedic Trauma Association, all fractures were open type III and 33-A3, respectively. The mean follow-up, operation time and union time were 1.8 years (range, 6 months to 2,6 years), 75 min (range, 60-100), and 3 months (range, 1.5-4), respectively. There was one complication of acute osteomyelitis which was successfully treated with antibiotic-load beams and aggressive bone debridement. No septic arthritis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that immediate retrograde intramedullary nailing in combat-related supracondylar femur fractures regardless of contamination even in Gustilo type III is a safe and reliable treatment method.


Assuntos
Traumatismos por Explosões/cirurgia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Militares , Adulto , Conflitos Armados , Traumatismos por Explosões/fisiopatologia , Desbridamento/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Seguimentos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Cominutivas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Int Orthop ; 43(3): 713-718, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808243

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rates of children and adults after open tibia fracture at a single medical centre. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients who sustained open tibia fractures and who received treatment at our hospital from 2012 to 2016. Data on age, gender, fracture site, Gustilo-Anderson grade, treatment management, and culture results from the infection site were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 37 children with a mean age of 7.19 ± 2.28 years and 89 adults with a mean age of 40.38 ± 13.53 years were enrolled. The rate of SSIs was 13.5% (6/37) in children, which was significantly lower than the 21.3% (19/89) rate in adults (p < 0.001). The mean number of days to discharge was 12.86 ± 10.25 in children, which was significantly lower than the mean of 28.67 ± 16.92 days in adults (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the average waiting time for soft tissue recovery before definitive surgery was 1.41 ± 1.79 and 8.42 ± 4.38 days in children and in adults, respectively, and the difference was significant (p < 0.001). Early infection occurred more frequently in adults (5/19) than in children (0/6). Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly found pathogen in both groups. CONCLUSION: The SSI rate of paediatric patients after open tibia fracture fixation is significantly lower than that of adults, and the prognosis of the former is superior. The results indicate a superior ability of soft tissue recovery and infection resistance after open tibia fracture fixation among children.


Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas/complicações , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Fraturas Expostas/microbiologia , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/fisiopatologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/microbiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33(3): 131-136, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30562247

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present our technique and early results using the Masquelet technique. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients with 14 open fractures of the femur and tibia were included between November 2013 and December 2014. INTERVENTION: A Masquelet technique was used to manage the open fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Infection and union rate. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 17 months. The mean bone defect was 56.6 mm. Eight fractures (57.1%) progressed to union at an average of 42.1 weeks. Infection developed in 3 fractures (21.4%). Overall, the induced membrane technique was abandoned in 5 (35.7%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The induced membrane technique showed a substantial rate of failure in the acute trauma setting in the lower limb. In the absence of sound published evidence, the authors now use the technique in selected cases only. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Substitutos Ósseos/administração & dosagem , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Implantes Absorvíveis , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Materiais Biocompatíveis/administração & dosagem , Substitutos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Sulfato de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Desbridamento , Implantes de Medicamento/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/complicações , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/complicações , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Extremidade Inferior/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimetil Metacrilato/administração & dosagem , Polimetil Metacrilato/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/complicações , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Injury ; 49 Suppl 4: S29-S33, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30518507

RESUMO

Septic nonunion is one of the most serious complications after an open fracture because both the infection and the bone defect need to be dealt with. Treatment is always protracted and expensive, and the result is uncertain. In the 1980s, Masquelet first described the technique of the induced membrane and autologous bone grafting to manage critical size bone defects. In septic nonunions, the described approach, characterised by two different surgical steps, allows a radical approach to manage the infection, and gives a significant biological stimulus to bone healing. In this case, we present a 35-year-old male patient with an open grade II femoral shaft fracture (AO / OTA 32C3). The patient was initially treated with an intramedullary nail and the resulting septic nonunion was subsequently managed with the induced membrane technique and a double-plate osteosynthesis to protect the biological chamber.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Sepse/cirurgia , Adulto , Pinos Ortopédicos , Placas Ósseas , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecção dos Ferimentos
17.
Injury ; 49 Suppl 4: S39-S42, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30518509

RESUMO

A fit 26 year-old-man presented to our Department with an open fracture of the left tibial shaft (AO 42-C3). The fracture was initially treated with an External Fixator, which was replaced by an intramedullary Grosse Kempf nail after 4 months. In the following year he developed an atrophic non-union and we witnessed the increasing bone resorption at the fracture site which led to the nail breakage. An accurate CT pre-operative planning was made and a revision surgery was successfully performed: the broken nail was removed and intercalary allograft reconstruction was made, using a compressible intramedullary nail. Whereas in literature it is well described how intercalary allografts can be used to fill the massive diaphyseal defects after tumor resections, we assumed it could also be an adequate technique to treat a large bone defect at a non-union site.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Pinos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Fixadores Externos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Osseointegração/fisiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/patologia
18.
Injury ; 49 Suppl 4: S58-S62, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526950

RESUMO

The treatment of open distal tibia fractures remains challenging, particularly when the fracture involves severe soft tissue damage and segmental bone loss. We present the case of a 33-year-old woman who sustained an open distal tibia fracture type 43-A3.3, with segmental bone loss, and a closed bifocal fibular fracture. The fractures were initially fixed with a temporary external fixator. The open distal tibial fracture underwent an intramedullary nailing on day six post-trauma, while the segmental bone loss was refilled with a temporary cement spacer, in order to create a biologic chamber, according to the technique by Masquelet et al. At three months post-trauma, the temporary cement spacer was removed and the bone loss was filled with an autologous bone graft obtained with the Reaming Irrigation Aspiration (RIA) system. The fracture successfully healed at 13 months post-trauma. Masquelet technique, in association with the RIA system, represents a valid strategy in the treatment of non-infected open complex fracture of the distal tibia with severe bone and soft tissue loss.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Lesões por Esmagamento/cirurgia , Fixadores Externos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Lesões por Esmagamento/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões por Esmagamento/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Trials ; 19(1): 328, 2018 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29941030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients can struggle to make sense of trials in emergency situations. This study examines patient experience of participating in the United Kingdom, Wound management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLLF) study, a trial of standard wound management versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). METHODS: The aim of the study was to understand the patient's lived experience of taking part in a trial of wound dressings. Interviews drawing on Phenomenology were undertaken with a purposive sample of 20 patients, on average 12 days into their hospital stay from July 2012-July 2013. RESULTS: The participants were vulnerable due to the emotional and physical impact of injury. They expressed their trial experience through the theme of being compromised identified in categories of being dependent, being trusting, being grateful and being without experience. Participants felt dependent on and trusted the team to make the right decisions for them and not cause them harm. Their hopes for future recovery were also invested within the expertise of the team. Despite often not being well enough to consent to the study prior to surgery, they wished to be involved as much as possible. In agreeing to take part they expressed gratitude for their care, wanted to be helpful to others and considered the trial interventions to be a small component in relation to the enormity of their injury and broader treatment. In making sense of the trial they felt they could not understand the interventions without experience of them but if they received NPWT they developed a strong technological preference for this intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer to be involved in studies within the limits of their capacity, despite not being able to provide informed consent. A variety of sources of knowledge may enable participants to feel that they have a better understanding of the interventions. Professional staff need to be aware of the situated nature of decision making where participants invest their hopes for recovery in the team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN33756652 . Registered on 24 February 2012.


Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas/terapia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Seleção de Pacientes , Sujeitos da Pesquisa/psicologia , Compreensão , Emergências , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Expostas/psicologia , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/efeitos adversos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Resultado do Tratamento , Confiança , Reino Unido , Cicatrização
20.
Injury ; 49(4): 866-870, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530513

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The best fixation method for open tibial fractures has long been a matter of debate, many studies have recommended the use of intramedullary nails over external fixation for treating such fractures, recent studies also showed favorable results for the use of plates in managing open tibial fractures. However, there are very few (if any) reports in the literature comparing the use of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis to reamed intramedullary nails in the fixation of open tibial fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the safety & efficiency of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis to reamed intramedullary nails in treating open tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: A single-center, parallel group, prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Academic Level 1 Trauma Center, during the period from October 2014 to December 2016. PATIENTS: A total of 60 patients with open tibial fractures were randomized to reamed intra-medullary nails (R-IMN) (group A) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) (group B). OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Patients were assessed for union (clinical & radiographic) & complications (e.g.; non-union, infection). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 methods in term of the incidence of infection or non-union. Time to full union was shorter for the R-IMN group when compared to that of the MIPO group & that was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: MIPO technique has equal safety to R-IMN technique in treating Gustilo-Anderson type I, II and III-A open tibial shaft fractures, as both techniques have similar rate of infection & non-union. These findings suggest that the MIPO technique can be considered a valid treatment alternative for such fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Therapeutic study.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Pinos Ortopédicos , Placas Ósseas , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Expostas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA