RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rib fixation for traumatic rib fractures is advocated to decrease morbidity and mortality in select patient populations. We intended to investigate the effect of combination osseous thoracic injuries on mortality with the hypothesis that combination injuries will worsen overall mortality and that SSRF will improve outcomes in combination injuries and in high-risk patients. METHODS: Patients with rib fractures were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Project registry from 2019. Patients were then divided into rib fracture(s) alone or in combination with sternal, thoracic vertebra, or scapula fracture. Patients were also categorized into those with COPD and smokers. Patients with AIS >3 outside of thorax were excluded. Patients were subcategorized into those who had rib fixation verse nonoperative management for all subgroups. Analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of rib fixation. RESULTS: A total of 111,066 patients were included for analysis. The overall mortality was 1.4%. Patients with COPD had over double the mortality risk, with an overall mortality of 3.4%. Combination injuries did not appear to increase mortality. SSRF did not decrease mortality; however, the number of patients in this group was too small to complete statistical analysis. The overall complication rate was 0.43%. There was a trend towards an increase in extrapulmonary complications in the group that underwent surgical fixation. DISCUSSION: Mortality from rib fractures with concomitant osseous thoracic fracture appears to be low. However, mortality is increased in patients with COPD regardless of rib fracture pattern. The number of patients who underwent SSRF was too small to make a statistical comparison.
Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Fraturas das Costelas , Humanos , Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Fraturas das Costelas/cirurgia , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Escápula/lesões , Escápula/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/mortalidade , Esterno/lesões , Esterno/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/mortalidade , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Fraturas Múltiplas/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
ABSTRACT: We aim to describe morphological structures of skull fractures and relevant factors in motorcycle accident victims in Vietnam. This work represents a retrospective cross-sectional study based on forensic reports of fatal motorcycle accident victims. Between January 2013 and August 2019, a total of 226 fatal motorcycle accident patients with skull fracture diagnoses were enrolled. Linear and depressed fractures were the common patterns (46.0% and 37.2% of cases, respectively), whereas stellate (11.5%) fractures were rare. Fractures of the temporal bone (68.6% of cases) and basilar skull (60.6%) were the most common, whereas fractures of the parietal bone were the least common (9.7%). Two or more patterns of skull fracture were recorded in 25.5% of cases, and 2 or more fracture locations were recorded in 76.6% of cases. Fractures of the parietal bone were associated with victims not wearing a helmet. In addition, fractures of the basilar skull were more likely to occur among victims with alcohol consumption. We found the common pattern of skull fractures was linear and depressed fractures, and the common location of skull fractures was temporal and basilar bone. Further studies that include larger sample sizes and collect more information should be conducted to better understand relationships between skull fractures and related factors.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Motocicletas , Fraturas Cranianas/patologia , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Fraturas Múltiplas/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/mortalidade , Vietnã/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Mortality rates in our fracture liaison service ranged from 2.7% at year 1 to 14.8% at year 5 post-screening. Presentation with multiple simultaneous fractures at screening was associated with higher risk of death. This finding indicates the need for increased focus on this high-risk group. PURPOSE: To examine all-cause mortality rates in a provincial fracture liaison service (FLS) and the association between the index fracture type, particularly multiple simultaneous fractures, and the risk of death at follow-up. METHODS: This cohort study includes fragility fracture patients aged 50+, enrolled in a provincial FLS in Ontario, Canada, between 2007 and 2010. All-cause mortality was assessed using administrative data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the risk of death 5 years after screening. RESULTS: Crude mortality rates for 6543 fragility fracture patients were 2.7% at year 1, 5.6% at year 2, and 14.8% at year 5 after screening. After adjusting for age and sex, and relative to distal radius fracture, patients with multiple (simultaneous) fractures at screening had a higher risk of dying (HR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.3-2.4), followed by those with a hip fracture (HR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.3-1.8), a proximal humerus fracture (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.2-1.7), and other single fractures (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7). Having an index ankle fracture was not associated with the risk of death over a distal radius fracture. As compared to the 50-65 age group, patients 66 years and older had a higher risk of death (for 66-70 age group: HR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.9-3.3; for 71-80: HR = 4.3, 95%CI 3.5-5.4; and for 81+: HR = 10.6, 95%CI 8.7-13.0). Females had a lower risk of death (HR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.5-0.6) than males. CONCLUSIONS: Presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of higher risk of death relative to a distal radius fracture. This finding indicates the need for increased focus on this high-risk group.
Assuntos
Fraturas Múltiplas , Fraturas do Quadril , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Fraturas do Quadril/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this article were to (1) compare our combined pelvic ring and acetabular fracture patients' rate of mortality and Injury Severity Score (ISS) to those of patients with isolated injuries at our center and to those with combined injuries as reported in the literature, (2) describe our treatment algorithm using the INFIX for these combination injuries, and (3) report our patients' radiographic and functional outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective IRB-approved case series and literature review. SETTING: US Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thousand six hundred ninety-seven with acetabular or pelvic ring injury, 174 patients with combination pelvic ring acetabular injuries, and 39 patients with 41 acetabular injuries treated with a surgical protocol. INTERVENTION: Pelvic ring reduction using INFIX and posterior fixation followed by acetabular reduction fixation. Anterior injury fixed with INFIX. MAIN OUTCOME: Mortality, ISS, pelvic reduction by Keshishyan index, acetabular reduction by the Matta criteria, and functional outcome by the Majeed score. RESULTS: Mortality was 5.7% and ISS was 12.5 for 174 combined injury patients. In the 39 patients with 41 injuries, excellent pelvic reduction was found in 39, and acetabular reduction was anatomic in 25 (61%), imperfect in 12 (29%), and poor in 4 (10%). Clinically 78% of the patients had good or excellent outcome and 22% had a fair or poor outcome. Nonanatomic acetabular reduction, persistent sciatic nerve palsy, and heterotopic ossification associated with poor clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment protocol resulted in excellent pelvic reduction, anatomic acetabular reduction in 61% of patients, and 78% good to excellent clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series Level IV.
Assuntos
Acetábulo/lesões , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/mortalidade , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple rib fractures are common in trauma patients, who are prone to trauma-associated complications. Surgical or nonsurgical interventions for the aforementioned conditions remain controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of our study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical prognosis of surgical fixation of multiple rib fractures in terms of (1) hospital-related endpoints (including duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay [LOS] and hospital LOS), (2) complications, (3) pulmonary function, and (4) pain scores. METHODS: We screened PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized and prospective studies published before January 2018. Individual effect sizes were standardized; the pooled effect size was calculated using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and hospital LOS. Moreover, complications, pulmonary function, and pain were assessed. RESULTS: The surgical group had a reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (weighted mean difference [WMD], -4.95 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.97 to -1.94; p = 0.001), ICU LOS (WMD, -4.81 days; 95% CI, -6.22 to -3.39; p < 0.001), and hospital LOS (WMD, -8.26 days; 95% CI, -11.73 to -4.79; p < 0.001) compared with the nonsurgical group. Complications likewise were less common in the surgical group, including pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64; p < 0.001), mortality (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.87; p = 0.030), chest wall deformity (OR, 0.02; 95% CI. 0.00-0.12; p < 0.001), dyspnea (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.54; p < 0.001), chest wall tightness (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05-0.22; p < 0.001) and incidence of tracheostomy (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20-0.57; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the surgical and nonsurgical groups in terms of pulmonary function, such as forced vital capacity (WMD, 6.81%; 95% CI: -8.86 to 22.48; p = 0.390) and pain scores (WMD, -11.41; 95% CI: -42.09 to 19.26; p = 0.470). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis lends stronger support to surgical fixation, rather than conservative treatment, for multiple rib fractures. Nevertheless, additional trials should be conducted to investigate surgical indications, timing, and followup for quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.
Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fraturas das Costelas/cirurgia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Fixação de Fratura/mortalidade , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Múltiplas/complicações , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Respiração Artificial , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: and Objective: Falling from a height is one of the main causes of blunt force trauma. Frequently seen in accidents or for the purpose of suicide, it can result in disability or death. The aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of fatalities due to falling from a height. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively examines 213 cases of fatal falls from a height that had occurred in and around Elazig province between January 2005 and December 2016. All the victims' autopsies were performed. The cases were reviewed in terms of such variables as gender, age, the month and season in which the incident took place, the cause of the fall, the location of the fall, the height of the fall, the injury site and the cause of death. RESULTS: It was determined that the falls were caused by: Accident in 171 (80.3%) cases, suicide in 41 (19.2%) cases and homicide in 1 (0.5%) case. Of these cases, 144 (67.6%) were men and 69 (32.4%) were women. In our study, the youngest case was aged 9 months while the eldest was 91 years, the average age being 43.6⯱â¯27.4 years. It was determined that 60.6% of the cases had fallen in their homes. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, it was observed that fatalities from height are mainly the result of an accident and thus preventable. Since fatalities were more common in the aged and in children, it was thought that protective measures should be implemented specifically for these groups such as appropriate planning and family education.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes Domésticos/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/mortalidade , Distribuição por Sexo , Turquia/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes in patients with rib fractures (RFX) who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) to those treated nonoperatively. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-four patients with multiple RFX divided into 2 groups: patients with surgically stabilized RFX (n = 87) were compared with nonoperatively managed patients in the matched control group (MCG) (n = 87). INTERVENTION: SSRF. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Age, sex, injury severity score, RFX, mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and intensive care unit length of stay (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), co-injuries, and time to surgery. Patients were further stratified by presence or absence of flail chest and pulmonary contusion (PC). RESULTS: Flail chest, displaced RFX, and PC were present significantly more often in SSRF patients compared with the MCG. Mortality was lower in SSRF group. HLOS and ICULOS were longer in SSRF group compared with the corresponding MCG patients regardless of timing to surgery (P < 0.01 for all). SSRF patients with flail chest had comparable HLOS, ICULOS, and DMV to MCG patients with flail chest (P > 0.3 for all). SSRF patients without flail chest had significantly longer HLOS and ICULOS than MCG patients without flail chest (P < 0.001 for both). Presence of PC did not affect lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: SSRF patients had reduced mortality compared with nonoperatively managed patients. HLOS, ICULOS, and DMV were longer in SSRF patients than in MCG. When flail chest was present, lengths of stay were comparable. PC did not seem to affect the surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Fraturas das Costelas/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Fraturas Múltiplas/complicações , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate and assess the effectiveness of surgical fixation of rib fractures in complex traumatic chest injuries compared with traditional nonoperative management. DESIGN: Retrospective observational comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 Major Trauma Centre in North West England. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 83 patients who were admitted urgently to our hospital after major trauma, between August 2012 and March 2015, and fulfilled the criteria for surgical fixation of their multiple rib fractures. Patients who had concomitant nonsurvivable injuries or did not consent for surgery were excluded. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of multiple rib fractures and flail chest segments versus traditional nonoperative management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome of interest was the total hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the incidence of respiratory complications such as hospital-acquired pneumonia, need for mechanical ventilation, and/or tracheotomy. The mortality rate was also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were included, 47 of these in the ORIF group and 36 in the non-ORIF group. The mean hospital LOS for patients in the non-ORIF group was 30.41 days (SD 30.1). This was markedly reduced in the ORIF group to a mean of 14.53 days (SD 11.7), with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients (77.7%) in the nonoperatively managed group required admission to the ICU compared with a significantly lower 48.9% (23 patients) in the ORIF group (P < 0.01). The incidence of respiratory complications was lower in the ORIF group but this difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 2.1% for the group that was treated surgically compared with 13.9% for the conservative group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical fixation of multiple displaced rib fractures reduced the total hospital LOS and the overall mortality in our major trauma patients and decreased the incidence of ICU admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Fraturas das Costelas/cirurgia , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Fraturas Múltiplas/complicações , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino UnidoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in-hospital, 1-year, and 5-year survivorship of geriatric patients after high-energy trauma, to compare survivorship of geriatric patients who sustained high-energy trauma with that of those who sustained low-energy trauma, and to identify predictors for mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Urban Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Study group of 1849 patients with high-energy trauma and comparison group of 761 patients with low-energy trauma. INTERVENTION: Each patient was observed from the time of index admission through the end of the study period or until death or readmission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Long-term survivorship based on the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Survivorship between patients with high-energy and low-energy injuries was statistically significant. Among patients who sustained high-energy injuries, in-hospital mortality was 8%, 1-year mortality was 15%, and 5-year mortality was 25%. Among patients who sustained low-energy injuries, in-hospital mortality was 3%, 1-year mortality was 23%, and 5-year mortality was 40%. Low-energy mechanism of injury was an independent predictor for 1-year and 5-year mortality, even when controlling for Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric patients with high-energy injuries and those with low-energy injuries seem to represent different patient populations, and low-energy mechanism seems to be a marker for frailty. High-energy mechanism was associated with lower long-term mortality rates, even when controlling for CCI, ISS, age, sex, BMI and admission GCS score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Fraturas Ósseas/mortalidade , Sobrevivência , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Múltiplas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , População Urbana , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgiaRESUMO
Oral bisphosphonates (BPs) are highly effective in preventing fractures and are recommended first-line therapies for patients with osteoporosis. We identified the incidence and predictors of oral BP treatment failure, defined as the incidence of two or more fractures while on treatment (≥2 FWOT) among users with high adherence. Fractures were considered from 6 months after treatment initiation and up to 6 months after discontinuation. Data from computerized records and pharmacy invoices were obtained from Sistema d'Informació per al Desenvolupament de l'Investigació en Atenció Primària (SIDIAP; Catalonia, Spain) and Danish Health Registries (Denmark) for all incident users of oral BPs in 2006-2007 and 2000-2001, respectively. Fine and Gray survival models using backward-stepwise selection (p-entry 0.049; p- exit 0.10) and accounting for the competing risk of therapy cessation were used to identify predictors of ≥2 FWOT among patients having persisted with treatment ≥6 months with overall medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80%. Incidence of ≥2 FWOT was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 3.2) and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2) per 1000 patient-years (PYs) within Catalonia and Denmark, respectively. Older age was predictive of ≥2 FWOT in both Catalonian and Danish cohorts: subhazard ratio (SHR) = 2.28 (95% CI, 1.11 to 4.68) and SHR = 2.61 (95% CI, 0.98 to 6.95), respectively, for 65 to <80 years; and SHR = 3.19 (95% CI, 1.33 to 7.69) and SHR = 4.88 (95% CI, 1.74 to 13.7), respectively, for ≥80 years. Further significant predictors of ≥2 FWOT identified within only one cohort were dementia, SHR = 4.46 (95% CI, 1.02 to 19.4) (SIDIAP); and history of recent or older fracture, SHR = 3.40 (95% CI, 1.50 to 7.68) and SHR = 2.08 (95% CI: 1.04-4.15), respectively (Denmark). Even among highly adherent users of oral BP therapy, a minority sustain multiple fractures while on treatment. Older age was predictive of increased risk within both study populations, as was history of recent/old fracture and dementia within one but not both populations. Additional and/or alternative strategies should be investigated for these patients.