[The Surgical Indication of Multiple Rib Fractures of Patients by Traumas and Timing of the Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures].

It's reported that 10% of the inpatients by traumas have fractured ribs. It's easy to judge if it's the case of flail chest, or respiratory failure due to airway injury or pulmonary contusion. There is no guideline for treatments of a patient who has multiple ribs fractures without respiratory failure. We did the surgical stabilization of rib fractures for 10 cases from 2020 to October 2023. As a result, we find out useful surgical indication for treatment of rib fractures.

Delayed flail chest from osteomyelitis and malnutrition that emerged 3 weeks after blunt chest trauma: a case report.

We present the case of a victim of a motor vehicle accident in his late 60s who suffered from severe torso injuries. He initially presented with abdominal and chest pain, and underwent emergency laparotomy for hemoperitoneum. After surgery, the patient developed pneumonia and septicemia, which were responsive to antibiotics. The patient was treated with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit for approximately 10 days and experienced a severe weight loss of approximately 30%, but slowly recovered without dyspnea. Notably, on hospital day 24, he experienced sudden respiratory distress and flail motion of the chest wall in a general ward. This late presentation of flail chest was attributed to non-union at rib fracture sites, and was likely exacerbated by malnutrition and osteomyelitis. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures and excision of the infected rib were successfully performed. The findings from this case highlight the complexity of managing delayed onset of flail chest. The findings from this case suggest the importance of vigilance for late emerging complications in patients with trauma, even when initial symptoms are absent.

Very long-term effects of conservatively treated blunt thoracic trauma: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the high incidence of blunt thoracic trauma and frequently performed conservative treatment, studies on very long-term consequences for these patients remain sparse in current literature. In this study, we identify prevalence of long-term morbidity such as chronic chest pain, shortness of breath, and analyze the effect on overall quality of life and health-related quality of life. METHODS: Questionnaires were send to patients admitted for blunt thoracic trauma at our institution and who were conservatively treated between 1997 and 2019. We evaluated the presences of currently existing chest pain, persistence of shortness of breath after their trauma, the perceived overall quality of life, and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of pain and shortness of breath on overall quality of life and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 185 trauma patients with blunt thoracic trauma who were admitted between 1997 and 2019, with a median long term follow up of 11 years. 60 percent still experienced chronic pain all these years after trauma, with 40,7 percent reporting mild pain, 12,1 percent reporting moderate pain, and with 7,7 percent showing severe pain. 18 percent still experienced shortness of breath during exercise. Both pain and shortness of breath showed no improvement in this period. Pain and shortness of breath due to thoracic trauma were associated with a lower overall quality of life and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Chronic pain and shortness of breath may be relatively common long after blunt thoracic trauma, and are of influence on quality of life and health-related quality of life in patients with conservatively treated blunt thoracic trauma.

Physiologic parameters and radiologic findings can predict pulmonary complications and guide management in traumatic rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic rib fracture is associated with a high morbidity rate and identifying patients at risk of developing pulmonary complications (PC) can guide management and potentially decrease unnecessary intensive care admissions. Therefore, we sought to assess and compare the utility of a physiologic parameter, vital capacity (VC), with the admission radiologic findings (RibScore) in predicting PC in patients with rib fractures. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review (2015-2018) of all adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to a Level I trauma center with traumatic rib fracture. Exclusion criteria included no CT scan and absence of VC within 48 h of admission. The cohort was stratified into two groups based on presence or absence of PC (pneumonia, unplanned intubation, unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit for a respiratory concern, or the need for a tracheostomy). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of PC. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients met the inclusion criteria of whom 70 % were males. The median age was 51 years and fall (48 %) was the most common type of injury. A total of 36 patients (5.5 %) developed a pulmonary complication. These patients were more likely to be older, had a higher ISS, and were more likely to require a tube thoracostomy placement. On multivariable logistic regression, first VC ≤30 % (AOR: 4.29), day 1 VC ≤30 % (AOR: 3.61), day 2 VC ≤30 % (AOR: 5.54), Δ(Day2-Day1 VC) (AOR: 0.96), and RibScore ≥2 (AOR: 3.19) were significantly associated with PC. On discrimination analysis, day 2 VC had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), 0.81, and was superior to first VC and day 1 VC in predicting PC. There was no statistically significant difference in predicting PC between day 2 VC and RibScore. On multivariable analysis, first VC ≤30 %, day 1 VC ≤30 %, day 2 VC ≤30 %, and admission RibScore ≥2 were associated with prolonged hospital and ICU LOS. CONCLUSION: VC and RibScore emerged as independent predictors of PC. However, VC was not found to be superior to RibScore in predicting PC. Further prospective research is warranted to validate the findings of this study.

Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Rib fracture(s) is a common and painful injury often associated with significant morbidity (e.g., respiratory complications) and high mortality rates, especially in the elderly. Risk stratification and prompt implementation of analgesic pathways using a multimodal analgesia approach comprise a primary endpoint of care to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with rib fractures. This narrative review aims to describe the most recent evidence and care pathways currently available, including risk stratification tools and pharmacologic and regional analgesic blocks frequently used as part of the broadly recommended multimodal analgesic approach. SOURCE: Available literature was searched using PubMed and Embase databases for each topic addressed herein and reviewed by content experts. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four risk stratification tools were identified, with the Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma score as most predictive. Current evidence on pharmacologic (i.e., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) and regional analgesia (i.e., thoracic epidural analgesia, thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block) techniques was reviewed, as was the pathophysiology of rib fracture(s) and its associated complications, including the development of chronic pain and disabilities. CONCLUSION: Rib fracture(s) continues to be a serious diagnosis, with high rates of mortality, development of chronic pain, and disability. A multidisciplinary approach to management, combined with appropriate analgesia and adherence to care bundles/protocols, has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Most of the risk-stratifying care pathways identified perform poorly in predicting mortality and complications after rib fracture(s).

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les fractures des côtes sont des blessures courantes et douloureuses souvent associées à une morbidité importante (p. ex., complications respiratoires) et à des taux de mortalité élevés, surtout chez les personnes âgées. La stratification des risques et la mise en œuvre rapide de voies analgésiques à l'aide d'une approche d'analgésie multimodale constituent un critère d'évaluation principal des soins visant à réduire la morbidité et la mortalité associées aux fractures des côtes. Ce compte rendu narratif a pour objectif de décrire les données probantes les plus récentes et les parcours de soins actuellement disponibles, y compris les outils de stratification des risques et les blocs analgésiques pharmacologiques et régionaux fréquemment utilisés dans le cadre de l'approche analgésique multimodale largement recommandée. SOURCES: La littérature disponible a été recherchée à l'aide des bases de données PubMed et Embase pour chaque sujet abordé dans le présent compte rendu et examinée par des expert·es en contenu. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Quatre outils de stratification des risques ont été identifiés, le score de l'Étude de la prise en charge des traumatismes contondants de la paroi thoracique (Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma) étant le plus prédictif. Les données probantes actuelles sur les techniques d'analgésie pharmacologiques (c.-à-d. acétaminophène, anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, gabapentinoïdes, kétamine, lidocaïne et dexmédétomidine) et d'analgésie régionale (c.-à-d. analgésie péridurale thoracique, bloc paravertébral thoracique, bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis et bloc du plan du muscle grand dentelé) ont été examinées, de même que la physiopathologie de la ou des fractures des côtes et de leurs complications associées, y compris l'apparition de douleurs chroniques et d'incapacités. CONCLUSION: Les fractures des côtes continuent d'être un diagnostic grave, avec des taux élevés de mortalité, de développement de douleurs chroniques et d'invalidité. Il a été démontré qu'une approche multidisciplinaire de la prise en charge, combinée à une analgésie appropriée et à l'adhésion aux ensembles et protocoles de soins, réduit la morbidité et la mortalité. La plupart des parcours de soins de stratification des risques identifiés sont peu performants pour prédire la mortalité et les complications après une ou plusieurs fractures de côtes.

Incidence and influence factors of venous thromboembolism in traumatic rib fracture patient: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the incidence and influencing factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: The retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients with traumatic rib fractures from 33 hospitals. RESULTS: The overall incidence of VTE in hospitalized patients with traumatic rib fractures was 8.1%. Patients with isolated traumatic rib fractures had a significantly lower incidence of VTE (4.4%) compared to patients with rib fractures combined with other injuries (12.0%). Multivariate analysis identified the number of rib fractures as an independent risk factor for thrombosis. Surgical stabilization of isolated rib fractures involving three or more ribs was associated with a lower VTE incidence compared to conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rib fractures have a higher incidence of VTE, positively correlated with the number of rib fractures. However, the occurrence of thrombosis is relatively low in isolated rib fractures. Targeted thromboprophylaxis strategies should be implemented for these patients, and surgical stabilization of rib fractures may be beneficial in reducing the risk of VTE.

Impact of obesity on outcomes after surgical stabilization of multiple rib fractures: Evidence from the US nationwide inpatient sample.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global health issue with increasing prevalence. Surgical procedures, such as surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), may be affected by obesity-related complications. The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of obesity on SSRF outcomes in multiple rib fractures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from adults aged ≥ 20 years in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database diagnosed with multiple rib fractures who underwent SSRF between 2005 and 2018. It investigated the relationship between obesity and in-patient outcomes, such as discharge status, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and adverse events using logistic and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Analysis of data from 1,754 patients (morbidly obese: 87; obese: 106; normal weight: 1,561) revealed that morbid obesity was associated with longer LOS (aBeta = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.07), higher hospital costs (aBeta = 47.35, 95% CI: 38.55, 56.14), increased risks of adverse events (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.61), hemorrhage/need for transfusion (aOR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.79) and mechanical ventilation ≥ 96 hours (aOR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.58) compared to normal weight patients. Among patients with flail chest, morbid obesity was significantly associated with tracheostomy (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.05, 4.32), ARDS/respiratory failure (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.70), and mechanical ventilation ≥ 96 hours (aOR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.47, 5.32). In contrast, morbid obesity had no significant associations with these adverse respiratory outcomes among patients without a flail chest (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is associated with adverse outcomes following SSRF for multiple rib fractures, especially for flail chest patients.

Timing matters: Early versus late rib fixation in patients with multiple rib fractures and pulmonary contusion.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has shown that surgical stabilization of rib fractures benefits patients with rib fractures accompanied by pulmonary contusion; however, the impact of timing on surgical stabilization of rib fractures in this patient population remains unexplored. We aimed to compare early versus late surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with traumatic rib fractures and concurrent pulmonary contusion. METHODS: We selected all adult patients with isolated blunt chest trauma, multiple rib fractures, and pulmonary contusion undergoing early (<72 hours) versus late surgical stabilization of rib fractures (≥72 hours) using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2016 to 2020. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for patient, injury, and hospital characteristics. Our outcomes were hospital length of stay, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unplanned intubation, ventilator days, unplanned intensive care unit admission, intensive care unit length of stay, tracheostomy rates, and mortality. We then performed sub-group analyses for patients with major or minor pulmonary contusion. RESULTS: We included 2,839 patients, of whom 1,520 (53.5%) underwent early surgical stabilization of rib fractures. After propensity score matching, 1,096 well-balanced pairs were formed. Early surgical stabilization of rib fractures was associated with a decrease in hospital length of stay (9 vs 13 days; P < .001), decreased intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs 7 days; P < .001), and lower rates of unplanned intubation (7.4% vs 11.4%; P = .001), unplanned intensive care unit admission (4.2% vs 105%, P < .001), and tracheostomy (8.4% vs 12.4%; P = .002). Similar results were also found in the subgroup analyses for patients with major or minor pulmonary contusion. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that in patients with multiple rib fractures and pulmonary contusion, the early implementation of surgical stabilization of rib fractures could be beneficial regardless of the severity of pulmonary contusion.

[Treatment strategy for severe implosion injuries of the lateral chest wall]. / Versorgungsstrategie bei schweren Implosionsverletzungen der lateralen Thoraxwand.

In the majority of cases implosion injuries to the thoracic wall are caused by blunt, massive force acting on the thorax. Basically, different regions and directions of the acting energy have to be taken into account. In common usage, the term implosion injury has become established, especially for the sequelae of lateral energy impact. Particular attention should be paid to the stability of the shoulder girdle, the underlying hemithorax and its intrathoracic organs.

COMPARISON BETWEEN ACTIVE ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION AND STANDARD CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION IN ASPHYCTIC CARDIAC ARREST RATS WITH MULTIPLE RIB FRACTURES.

ABSTRACT: Background: Active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (AACD-CPR) is potentially more effective for cardiac arrest (CA) with multiple rib fractures. However, its effect on survival rates and neurological outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to assess if AACD-CPR improves survival rates and neurological outcomes in a rat model of asphyctic CA with multiple rib fractures. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups-AACD group (n = 15), standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) group (n = 15), and sham group (n = 10)-after bilateral rib fractures were surgically created and endotracheal intubation was performed. AACD-CPR and STD-CPR groups underwent 8 min of asphyxia followed by different CPR techniques. The sham group had venous catheterization only. Physiological variables and arterial blood gases were recorded at baseline and during a 4-h monitoring period. Neurological deficit scores (NDSs) and cumulative survival rates were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h. NDS, serum biomarkers, and hippocampal neuron analysis were used to evaluate neurological outcomes. Results: No statistical differences were observed in the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-, 48-, and 72-h survival rates between the AACD-CPR and STD-CPR groups. AACD-CPR rats had lower serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and S100B at 72 h post-ROSC, and higher NDS at 72 h post-ROSC compared with STD-CPR animals. Cellular morphology analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and TUNEL/DAPI assays showed more viable neurons and fewer apoptotic neurons in the AACD-CPR group than in the STD-CPR group. Conclusions: AACD-CPR can achieve similar survival rates and better neurological outcome after asphyxial CA in rats with multiple rib fractures when compared with STD-CPR.

Risk factors for delayed hemothorax in patients with rib fracture in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Although rib fractures are a risk factor, not all rib fracture patients will develop delayed hemothorax. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors which can identify rib fracture patients in the emergency department who may develop delayed hemothorax. METHODS: Adult patients seen in the emergency room between January 2016 and February 2021 with rib fractures caused by blunt chest trauma were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent chest tube insertion within 2 days and those without follow-up chest radiographs within 2-30 days were excluded. We used a stepwise backward-elimination multivariable logistic regression model for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included in this study. The number of total (P < 0.001), lateral (P = 0.019), and displaced (P < 0.001) rib fractures were significantly associated with delayed hemothorax. Lung contusions (P = 0.002), and initial minimal hemothorax (P < 0.001) and pneumothorax (P < 0.001) were more frequently associated with delayed hemothorax. Age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.06, P = 0.022), mechanical ventilator use (aOR 9.67, 95% CI 1.01-92.75, P = 0.049), initial hemothorax (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.05-4.65, P = 0.037) and pneumothorax (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.36-6.54, P = 0.006), and displaced rib fractures (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 1.64-7.53, P = 0.001) were independently associated with delayed hemothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Age, mechanical ventilation, initial hemo- or pneumothorax, and displaced rib fractures were risk factors for delayed hemothorax. Patients with these risk factors, and especially those with ≥2 displaced rib fractures, require close chest radiography follow-up of 2-30 days after the initial trauma.

[Biomechanics of thoracic wall instability]. / Biomechanik der Thoraxwandinstabilität.

Traumatic injuries of the thorax can entail thoracic wall instability (flail chest), which can affect both the shape of the thorax and the mechanics of respiration; however, so far little is known about the biomechanics of the unstable thoracic wall and the optimal surgical fixation. This review article summarizes the current state of research regarding experimental models and previous findings. The thoracic wall is primarily burdened by complex muscle and compression forces during respiration and the mechanical coupling to spinal movement. Previous experimental models focused on the burden caused by respiration, but are mostly not validated, barely established, and severely limited with respect to the simulation of physiologically occurring forces. Nevertheless, previous results suggested that osteosynthesis of an unstable thoracic wall is essential from a biomechanical point of view to restore the native respiratory mechanics, thoracic shape and spinal stability. Moreover, in vitro studies also showed better stabilizing properties of plate osteosynthesis compared to intramedullary splints, wires or screws. The optimum number and selection of ribs to be fixated for the different types of thoracic wall instability is still unknown from a biomechanical perspective. Future biomechanical investigations should simulate respiratory and spinal movement by means of validated models.

External validation of novel Revised Intensity Battle Score and comparison of static rib fracture scoring systems.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare and externally validate the previously developed Revised Intensity Battle Score (RIBS) against other proposed scores for predicting poor outcomes after rib fractures. METHODS: An external validation set was assembled retrospectively, comprising 1,493 adult patients with one or more rib fractures admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2022. The following rib fracture scores were calculated for each patient: RIBS, Injury Severity Score, Rib Fracture Score, Chest Trauma Score, and Battle score. Each was investigated to assess utility in predicting mortality, intensive care unit upgrade, unplanned intubation and ventilator days. Performance was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Of the 1,493 patients who met inclusion criteria, 239 patients (16%) experienced one of more of the investigated outcomes. Generally, scores performed best at predicting mortality and ventilator days. The RIBS stood out as best predicting "any complication" (AUC = 0.735) and ">7 ventilator days" (AUC = 0.771). CONCLUSION: The RIBS represents an externally validated triage score in patients with rib fractures and compares favorably to other static scoring systems. Use of this score as a triage tool may allow stratifying patients who may benefit from direct intensive care unit admission, neuraxial anesthesia and aggressive respiratory care. Next steps include prospective investigation of how pairing these interventions with score directed triage impacts outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

MRI in suspected chest wall fractures: diagnostic value in work-related chest blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze MRI findings in suspected early fractures of the chest (ribs and sternum) and assess if this technique can add value in occupational medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 112 consecutive patients with work-related mild closed chest trauma who underwent early thoracic MRI, when there was not a clear fracture on radiograph or when the symptoms were intense and not explained by radiographic findings. MRI was evaluated by two experienced radiologists independently. The number and location of fractures and extraosseous findings were recorded. A multivariate analysis was performed to correlate the fracture characteristics and time to RTW (return-to-work). Interobserver agreement and image quality were assessed. RESULTS: 100 patients (82 men, mean age 46 years, range 22-64 years) were included. MRI revealed thoracic wall injuries in 88%: rib and/or sternal fractures in 86% and muscle contusion in the remaining patients. Most patients had multiple ribs fractured, mostly at the chondrocostal junction (n=38). The interobserver agreement was excellent, with minor discrepancies in the total number of ribs fractured. The mean time to return-to-work was 41 days, with statistically significant correlation with the number of fractures. Time to return-to-work increased in displaced fractures, sternal fractures, extraosseous complications, and with age. CONCLUSION: Early MRI after work-related chest trauma identifies the source of pain in most patients, mainly radiographically occult rib fractures. In some cases, MRI may also provide prognostic information about return-to-work.

Evolution of Pulmonary Contusions in Patients With Severe Rib Fractures: Cause for Concern?

INTRODUCTION: The progression of pulmonary contusions remains poorly understood. This study aimed to measure the radiographic change in pulmonary contusions over time and evaluate the association of the radiographic change with clinical outcomes and surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults admitted with three or more displaced rib fractures or flail segment on trauma CT and when a chest CT was repeated within one week after trauma. Radiographic severity of pulmonary contusions was assessed using the Blunt Pulmonary Contusion Score (BPC18). Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relation between SSRF and worsening contusions on repeat CT, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 231 patients, 56 (24%) had a repeat CT scan. Of these, 55 (98%) had pulmonary contusion on the first CT scan with a median BPC18 score of 5 (P25-P75 3-7). Repeat CTs showed an overall decrease of the median BPC18 score to 4 (P25-P75 2-6, P = .02), but demonstrated a worsening of the pulmonary contusion in 16 patients (29%). All repeat CTs conducted within 12 hours post-injury demonstrated increasing BPC18. Radiographic worsening of pulmonary contusions was not associated with SSRF, nor with worse respiratory outcomes or intensive care length of stay, compared to patients with radiographically stable or improving contusions. DISCUSSION: In patients with severe rib fracture patterns who undergo repeat imaging, pulmonary contusions are prevalent and become radiographically worse within at least the first 12 hours after injury. No association between radiographic worsening and clinical outcomes was found.

Effectiveness of erector spinae plane block for rib fracture analgesia: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review will investigate the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block as an analgesic technique for patients with rib fractures compared with all other standard management techniques. Comparisons will be made with both nerve blocks (neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks) and systemic treatment (with patient-controlled analgesia and/or per required need analgesia for breakthrough pain). INTRODUCTION: Erector spinae plane block is a well-established rescue analgesia option for patients with rib fractures. The use of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in clinical practice has been largely based on observational data, with recent randomized controlled trials examining it against several other options for analgesic management. This review will compare the erector spinae against all other management techniques used in practice for rib fractures to determine whether this is the most effective analgesic technique. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will include all randomized controlled and pseudo-randomized controlled trials examining ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for the analgesic management of traumatic rib fractures. All other study designs will be excluded. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ISRCTN registry will be searched to identify all relevant ongoing clinical trials. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted into software for statistical analysis (including meta-analysis where possible). REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023414849.

Beyond the short-term relief: Outcomes of geriatric rib fracture patients receiving paravertebral nerve blocks and epidural analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is a critical component of rib fracture management. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes of geriatric rib fracture patients who received paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) versus epidural analgesia (EA) on a national level. METHODS: We performed a 5-year (2011-15) retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmission database. We included all the geriatric (≥65 years) blunt trauma patients with rib fractures who received a paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) or Epidural analgesia (EA) for chest injuries. We excluded patients who were dead on arrival, those with head AIS≥3, spine AIS >0, and those with cognitive impairment. Patients were stratified into two groups (PVNB and EA). A propensity score matching (1:2) was performed, and the two groups were compared. Our outcomes included delirium, hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmissions, 90-day mechanical ventilation, and initial and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,855 geriatric rib fracture patients were identified, out of which 352 (12 %) received PVNB and 2,503 (87 %) received EA. The mean (SD) age was 78 (8) years and 53 % were female. A total of 1,041 patients were matched (PVNB=347, EA=694 patients). The median [IQR] Injury severity score was 9 [3-15], median chest AIS was 3 [2-4], and 70 % had ≥3 rib fractures. The total mortality during index admission was 6 %, 13 % experienced delirium, and the median hospital LOS was 6 [4-10] days. There was no difference in the primary outcomes of the two groups including rates of index admission mortality (PVNB: 5.2% vs. EA:6.3 %, p = 0.548) and delirium (PVNB: 12.4% vs. EA:12.9 %, p = 0.862). We also found no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of 90-day respiratory complications (p = 1.000), 90-day readmission (p = 0.111), 90-day mortality (p = 0.718), and 90-day need for mechanical ventilation (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The use of PVNB in geriatric trauma patients with multiple rib fractures is associated with comparable in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes relative to EA. PVNB is relatively easy to perform and has a better side effect profile. The use of PVNB as part of rib fracture management protocols warrants further consideration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/Care Management.