The burden of readmissions after rib fractures among older adults.

BACKGROUND: The index hospitalization morbidity and mortality of rib fractures among older adults (aged ≥65 years) is well-known, yet the burden and risks for readmissions after rib fractures in this vulnerable population remain understudied. We aimed to characterize the burdens and etiologies associated with 3-month readmissions among older adults who suffer rib fractures. We hypothesized that readmissions would be common and associated with modifiable etiologies. METHODS: This survey-weighted retrospective study using the 2017 and 2019 National Readmissions Database evaluated adults aged ≥65 years hospitalized with multiple rib fractures and without major extrathoracic injuries. The main outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing all-cause 3-month readmissions. We assessed the 5 leading principal readmission diagnoses overall and delineated them by index hospitalization discharge disposition (home or facility). Sensitivity analysis using clinical classification categories characterized readmissions that could reasonably represent rib fracture-related sequelae. RESULTS: In 2017, 25,092 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 20% (N = 4,894) experiencing 3-month readmissions. Six percent of patients did not survive their readmission. The 5 leading principal readmission diagnoses were sepsis (many associated with secondary diagnoses of pneumonia [41%] or urinary tract infections [41%]), hypertensive heart/kidney disease, hemothorax, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. In 2019, a comparable 3-month readmission rate of 23% and identical 5 leading diagnoses were found. Principal readmission diagnosis of hemothorax was associated with the shortest time to readmission (median [interquartile range]:9 [5-23] days). Among patients discharged home after index hospitalization, pleural effusion-possibly representing mischaracterized hemothorax-was among the leading principal readmission diagnoses. Some patients readmitted with a principal diagnosis of hemothorax or pleural effusion had these diagnoses at index hospitalization; a lower proportion of these patients underwent pleural fluid intervention during index hospitalization compared with readmission. On sensitivity analysis, 30% of 3-month readmissions were associated with principal diagnoses suggesting rib fracture-related sequelae. CONCLUSION: Readmissions are not infrequent among older adults who suffer rib fractures, even in the absence of major extrathoracic injuries. Future studies should better characterize how specific complications associated with readmissions, such as pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and delayed hemothoraces, could be mitigated.

Benefits of Rib Fixation Utilizing Low-Cost Materials: A Randomized Pilot Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) using standard rib plating systems has become a norm in developed countries. However, the procedure has not garnered much interest in low-middle-income countries, primarily because of the cost. METHODS: This was a single-center pilot randomized trial. Patients with severe rib fractures were randomized into two groups: SSRF and nonoperative management. SSRF arm patients underwent surgical fixation in addition to the tenets of nonoperative management. Low-cost materials like stainless steel wires and braided polyester sutures were used for fracture fixation. The primary outcome was to assess the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were randomized, 11 in each arm. Per-protocol analysis showed that the SSRF arm had significantly reduced duration of hospital stay (22.6 ± 19.1 d versus 7.9 ± 5.7 d, P value 0.031), serial pain scores at 48 h and 5 d (median score 5, IQR (3-6) versus median score 7, IQR (6.5-8), P value 0.004 at 48 h and median score 2 IQR (2-3) versus median score 7 IQR (4.5-7) P value 0.0005 at 5 d), significantly reduced need for injectable opioids (9.9 ± 3.8 mg versus 4.4 ± 3.4 mg, P value 0.003) and significantly more ventilator-free days (19.9 ± 8.7 d versus 26.4 ± 3.2 d, P value 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in the total duration of ICU stay (median number of days 2, IQR 1-4.5 versus median number of days 7, IQR 1-14, P value 0.958), need for tracheostomy (36.4% versus 0%, P value 0.155), and pulmonary and pleural complications. CONCLUSIONS: SSRF with low-cost materials may provide benefits similar to standard rib plating systems and can be used safely in resource-poor settings.

Small Hemothoraces Not Drained on Admission: Initial Volume Predicts Need for Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Unlike large hemothoraces (HTX), small HTX after blunt trauma may be observed without drainage. We aimed to study if there were risk factors that would predict the need for intervention in initially observed small HTX. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with blunt traumatic HTX from 2016 to 2022 was performed. Patients with small HTX (pleural fluid volume <400 mL on admission chest computerized tomography [CT]) were included. Patients were considered as being "initially observed" if there was no intervention for the HTX within 48 hours after admission. Primary outcome was any HTX-related intervention (open, thoracoscopic or percutaneous procedures) occurring after 48 hours and up to 6 months after injury. Univariable and multivariable statistical analyses were employed. A P-value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 335 patients with HTX, 188 (59.6%) met inclusion criteria. Median (interquartile range) HTX volume was 90 (36-134) ml. One hundred and twenty-seven (68%) were initially observed. Of these, 31 (24%) had the primary outcome. These patients had a larger HTX volume (median, 129 vs 68 mL, P = .0001), and number of rib fractures (median, 7 vs 4, P = .0002) compared to those without the primary outcome. Chest-related readmission occurred in 8 (6%) with a median of 20 days from injury. Of these, 7 required an HTX-related intervention. Logistic regression analysis found that both the number of rib fractures and HTX volume independently predicted the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: For small HTX initially observed, number of rib fractures and initial volume predicted delayed HTX-related intervention.

Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Rib fracture(s) is a common and painful injury often associated with significant morbidity (e.g., respiratory complications) and high mortality rates, especially in the elderly. Risk stratification and prompt implementation of analgesic pathways using a multimodal analgesia approach comprise a primary endpoint of care to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with rib fractures. This narrative review aims to describe the most recent evidence and care pathways currently available, including risk stratification tools and pharmacologic and regional analgesic blocks frequently used as part of the broadly recommended multimodal analgesic approach. SOURCE: Available literature was searched using PubMed and Embase databases for each topic addressed herein and reviewed by content experts. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four risk stratification tools were identified, with the Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma score as most predictive. Current evidence on pharmacologic (i.e., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) and regional analgesia (i.e., thoracic epidural analgesia, thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block) techniques was reviewed, as was the pathophysiology of rib fracture(s) and its associated complications, including the development of chronic pain and disabilities. CONCLUSION: Rib fracture(s) continues to be a serious diagnosis, with high rates of mortality, development of chronic pain, and disability. A multidisciplinary approach to management, combined with appropriate analgesia and adherence to care bundles/protocols, has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Most of the risk-stratifying care pathways identified perform poorly in predicting mortality and complications after rib fracture(s).

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les fractures des côtes sont des blessures courantes et douloureuses souvent associées à une morbidité importante (p. ex., complications respiratoires) et à des taux de mortalité élevés, surtout chez les personnes âgées. La stratification des risques et la mise en œuvre rapide de voies analgésiques à l'aide d'une approche d'analgésie multimodale constituent un critère d'évaluation principal des soins visant à réduire la morbidité et la mortalité associées aux fractures des côtes. Ce compte rendu narratif a pour objectif de décrire les données probantes les plus récentes et les parcours de soins actuellement disponibles, y compris les outils de stratification des risques et les blocs analgésiques pharmacologiques et régionaux fréquemment utilisés dans le cadre de l'approche analgésique multimodale largement recommandée. SOURCES: La littérature disponible a été recherchée à l'aide des bases de données PubMed et Embase pour chaque sujet abordé dans le présent compte rendu et examinée par des expert·es en contenu. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Quatre outils de stratification des risques ont été identifiés, le score de l'Étude de la prise en charge des traumatismes contondants de la paroi thoracique (Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma) étant le plus prédictif. Les données probantes actuelles sur les techniques d'analgésie pharmacologiques (c.-à-d. acétaminophène, anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, gabapentinoïdes, kétamine, lidocaïne et dexmédétomidine) et d'analgésie régionale (c.-à-d. analgésie péridurale thoracique, bloc paravertébral thoracique, bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis et bloc du plan du muscle grand dentelé) ont été examinées, de même que la physiopathologie de la ou des fractures des côtes et de leurs complications associées, y compris l'apparition de douleurs chroniques et d'incapacités. CONCLUSION: Les fractures des côtes continuent d'être un diagnostic grave, avec des taux élevés de mortalité, de développement de douleurs chroniques et d'invalidité. Il a été démontré qu'une approche multidisciplinaire de la prise en charge, combinée à une analgésie appropriée et à l'adhésion aux ensembles et protocoles de soins, réduit la morbidité et la mortalité. La plupart des parcours de soins de stratification des risques identifiés sont peu performants pour prédire la mortalité et les complications après une ou plusieurs fractures de côtes.

Contemporary management of patients with multiple rib fractures: What you need to know.

ABSTRACT: Ten percent of all injured patients and 55% of patients with blunt chest trauma experience rib fractures. The incidence of death due to rib fractures is related to the number of fractured ribs, severity of fractured ribs, and patient age and comorbid conditions. Death due to rib fracture is mostly caused by pneumonia because of inability to expectorate and take deep breaths. Over the last 25 to 30 years, there has been renewed interest in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), known colloquially as "rib plating." This review will present what you need to know in regard to triage decisions on whether to admit a patient to the hospital, the location to which they should be admitted, criteria and evidentiary support for SSRF, timing to SSRF, and operative technique. The review also addresses the cost-effectiveness of this operation and stresses nonoperative treatment modalities that should be implemented prior to operation.

The therapeutic value of vacuum external fixation in polytrauma patients with multiple ribs fracture.

BACKGROUND: Multiple displaced rib fractures often result in a poor prognosis. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to provide benefits for patients with displaced rib fractures and flail chest. Nevertheless, for patients who are unwilling or unsuitable for surgery, the therapeutic options are limited. We developed a novel plastic vacuum device for rib fractures external stabilization. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of this device against a traditional chest strap in polytrauma patients with multiple rib fractures. METHODS: A retrospective investigation was conducted on polytrauma patients with multiple rib fractures admitted to our trauma center between March 2020 and March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: vacuum external fixation and chest strap. Comparative analysis was conducted on baseline parameters, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: In this study, 54 patients were included, with 28 receiving chest strap and 26 undergoing vacuum external fixation. Results showed that, at 3 days and 7 days postintervention, the vacuum external fixation group had significantly lower visual analog scale scores during deep breathing and coughing (P < .05). Vacuum external fixation also reduced pleural drainage duration and volume, as well as lowered the risk of pneumonia and other complications (P < .05). Furthermore, the vacuum external fixation group demonstrated notable improvements in vital capacity, tidal volume, blood-gas test results, and a shorter hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: According to the study findings, vacuum external fixation appears to offer benefits to patients with multiple rib fractures, potentially reducing the risk of complications and improving overall clinical outcomes.

An ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with continuous local anaesthetic infusion and epidural analgesia for rib fracture pain.

BACKGROUND: We compared analgesia with an ultrasound (US)-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to thoracic epidural analgesia (EA) with continuous local anaesthetic infusion in patients with unilateral multiple traumatic rib fractures. EA often carries contraindications in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs), whereby having alternative effective methods to treat rib fracture pain remains important to patient care. Thus, we hypothesised that both regional anaesthetic techniques would provide effective pain relief. METHODS: In this study, we included 59 patients with unilateral MRFs and a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 at rest or upon movement. Patients were randomised to receive a US-guided SAPB or continuous infusion EA with 2 mg/mL ropivacaine. Patients were given a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device with intravenous oxycodone boluses for rescue medication. The primary outcome was a change in the NRS score at rest and upon movement from baseline to Day 2 following the block. We also measured the forced expiratory volume in 1 s of expiration (FEV1) and FEV1% at the same time points when NRS was measured. The total consumption of oxycodone with PCA was measured at 24 and 48 h after the block. RESULTS: We detected a significant reduction (≥2) in NRS for both groups; however, EA associated with a greater reduction in NRS upon movement after block initiation. The mean reduction in NRS upon movement within 1 h was 3 (1.8, p < .01) in the SAPB group versus 4.7 (2.4, p < .01) in the EA group. We found no significant difference between groups in pain scores on Days 1 and 2 following the block. In the EA group, FEV1% increase in the first 12 h from baseline. Finally, PCA oxycodone consumption did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SAPB with continuous local anaesthetic infusion is an effective alternative to treat rib fracture pain when EA is contraindicated. We found that SABP significantly reduces pain in patients with unilateral MRFs, although EA achieves better analgesia over the first 12 h following the block.

Effectiveness of erector spinae plane block for rib fracture analgesia: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review will investigate the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block as an analgesic technique for patients with rib fractures compared with all other standard management techniques. Comparisons will be made with both nerve blocks (neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks) and systemic treatment (with patient-controlled analgesia and/or per required need analgesia for breakthrough pain). INTRODUCTION: Erector spinae plane block is a well-established rescue analgesia option for patients with rib fractures. The use of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in clinical practice has been largely based on observational data, with recent randomized controlled trials examining it against several other options for analgesic management. This review will compare the erector spinae against all other management techniques used in practice for rib fractures to determine whether this is the most effective analgesic technique. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will include all randomized controlled and pseudo-randomized controlled trials examining ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for the analgesic management of traumatic rib fractures. All other study designs will be excluded. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ISRCTN registry will be searched to identify all relevant ongoing clinical trials. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted into software for statistical analysis (including meta-analysis where possible). REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023414849.

External validation of novel Revised Intensity Battle Score and comparison of static rib fracture scoring systems.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare and externally validate the previously developed Revised Intensity Battle Score (RIBS) against other proposed scores for predicting poor outcomes after rib fractures. METHODS: An external validation set was assembled retrospectively, comprising 1,493 adult patients with one or more rib fractures admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2022. The following rib fracture scores were calculated for each patient: RIBS, Injury Severity Score, Rib Fracture Score, Chest Trauma Score, and Battle score. Each was investigated to assess utility in predicting mortality, intensive care unit upgrade, unplanned intubation and ventilator days. Performance was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Of the 1,493 patients who met inclusion criteria, 239 patients (16%) experienced one of more of the investigated outcomes. Generally, scores performed best at predicting mortality and ventilator days. The RIBS stood out as best predicting "any complication" (AUC = 0.735) and ">7 ventilator days" (AUC = 0.771). CONCLUSION: The RIBS represents an externally validated triage score in patients with rib fractures and compares favorably to other static scoring systems. Use of this score as a triage tool may allow stratifying patients who may benefit from direct intensive care unit admission, neuraxial anesthesia and aggressive respiratory care. Next steps include prospective investigation of how pairing these interventions with score directed triage impacts outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Early risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with severe blunt thoracic trauma: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with severe chest trauma require mechanical ventilation (MV). Early prediction of the duration of MV may influence clinical decisions. We aimed to determine early risk factors for prolonged MV among adults suffering from severe blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included all patients admitted between January 2014 and December 2020 due to severe blunt chest trauma. The primary outcome was prolonged MV, defined as invasive MV lasting more than 14 days. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for prolonged MV. RESULTS: The final analysis included 378 patients. The median duration of MV was 9.7 (IQR 3.0-18.0) days. 221 (58.5 %) patients required MV for more than 7 days and 143 (37.8 %) for more than 14 days. Male gender (aOR 3.01, 95 % CI 1.63-5.58, p < 0.001), age (aOR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.21-1.63, p < 0.001, for each category above 30 years), presence of severe head trauma (aOR 3.77, 95 % CI 2.23-6.38, p < 0.001), and transfusion of >5 blood units on admission (aOR 2.85, 95 % CI 1.62-5.02, p < 0.001) were independently associated with prolonged MV. The number of fractured ribs and the extent of lung contusions were associated with MV for more than 7 days, but not for 14 days. In the subgroup of 134 patients without concomitant head trauma, age (aOR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.18-2.27, p = 0.004, for each category above 30 years), respiratory comorbidities (aOR 9.70, 95 % CI 1.49-63.01, p = 0.017), worse p/f ratio during the first 24 h (aOR 1.55, 95 % CI 1.15-2.09, p = 0.004), and transfusion of >5 blood units on admission (aOR 5.71 95 % CI 1.84-17.68, p = 0.003) were independently associated with MV for more than 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: Several predictors have been identified as independently associated with prolonged MV. Patients who meet these criteria are at high risk for prolonged MV and should be considered for interventions that could potentially shorten MV duration and reduce associated complications. Hemodynamically stable, healthy young patients suffering from severe thoracic trauma but no head injury, including those with extensive lung contusions and rib fractures, have a low risk of prolonged MV.

COMPARISON BETWEEN ACTIVE ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION AND STANDARD CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION IN ASPHYCTIC CARDIAC ARREST RATS WITH MULTIPLE RIB FRACTURES.

ABSTRACT: Background: Active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (AACD-CPR) is potentially more effective for cardiac arrest (CA) with multiple rib fractures. However, its effect on survival rates and neurological outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to assess if AACD-CPR improves survival rates and neurological outcomes in a rat model of asphyctic CA with multiple rib fractures. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups-AACD group (n = 15), standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) group (n = 15), and sham group (n = 10)-after bilateral rib fractures were surgically created and endotracheal intubation was performed. AACD-CPR and STD-CPR groups underwent 8 min of asphyxia followed by different CPR techniques. The sham group had venous catheterization only. Physiological variables and arterial blood gases were recorded at baseline and during a 4-h monitoring period. Neurological deficit scores (NDSs) and cumulative survival rates were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h. NDS, serum biomarkers, and hippocampal neuron analysis were used to evaluate neurological outcomes. Results: No statistical differences were observed in the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-, 48-, and 72-h survival rates between the AACD-CPR and STD-CPR groups. AACD-CPR rats had lower serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and S100B at 72 h post-ROSC, and higher NDS at 72 h post-ROSC compared with STD-CPR animals. Cellular morphology analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and TUNEL/DAPI assays showed more viable neurons and fewer apoptotic neurons in the AACD-CPR group than in the STD-CPR group. Conclusions: AACD-CPR can achieve similar survival rates and better neurological outcome after asphyxial CA in rats with multiple rib fractures when compared with STD-CPR.

Beyond the short-term relief: Outcomes of geriatric rib fracture patients receiving paravertebral nerve blocks and epidural analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is a critical component of rib fracture management. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes of geriatric rib fracture patients who received paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) versus epidural analgesia (EA) on a national level. METHODS: We performed a 5-year (2011-15) retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmission database. We included all the geriatric (≥65 years) blunt trauma patients with rib fractures who received a paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) or Epidural analgesia (EA) for chest injuries. We excluded patients who were dead on arrival, those with head AIS≥3, spine AIS >0, and those with cognitive impairment. Patients were stratified into two groups (PVNB and EA). A propensity score matching (1:2) was performed, and the two groups were compared. Our outcomes included delirium, hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmissions, 90-day mechanical ventilation, and initial and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,855 geriatric rib fracture patients were identified, out of which 352 (12 %) received PVNB and 2,503 (87 %) received EA. The mean (SD) age was 78 (8) years and 53 % were female. A total of 1,041 patients were matched (PVNB=347, EA=694 patients). The median [IQR] Injury severity score was 9 [3-15], median chest AIS was 3 [2-4], and 70 % had ≥3 rib fractures. The total mortality during index admission was 6 %, 13 % experienced delirium, and the median hospital LOS was 6 [4-10] days. There was no difference in the primary outcomes of the two groups including rates of index admission mortality (PVNB: 5.2% vs. EA:6.3 %, p = 0.548) and delirium (PVNB: 12.4% vs. EA:12.9 %, p = 0.862). We also found no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of 90-day respiratory complications (p = 1.000), 90-day readmission (p = 0.111), 90-day mortality (p = 0.718), and 90-day need for mechanical ventilation (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The use of PVNB in geriatric trauma patients with multiple rib fractures is associated with comparable in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes relative to EA. PVNB is relatively easy to perform and has a better side effect profile. The use of PVNB as part of rib fracture management protocols warrants further consideration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/Care Management.

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Versus Multimodal Pain Management for Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPBs) are frequently utilized when treating patients with multiple rib fractures. While previous work has demonstrated the efficacy of ESPB as an adequate method of pain control, there has been no work comparing a continuous ESPB to "best practice" multimodal pain control. We hypothesize that a continuous ESPB catheter combined with a multimodal pain regimen may be associated with a decrease in opioid requirements when compared to a multimodal pain regimen alone. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study at a level 1 trauma center from September 2016 through September 2021. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 y or older with at least three unilateral rib fractures who were not mechanically ventilated during admission. The primary outcome was the total morphine equivalents utilized throughout the index admission. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included in this study, 71 in each cohort. Patients included had a mean age of 52.5 y, and 18% were female. Demographic data including injury severity score, total number of rib fractures, and length of stay were similar. While there was a trend toward a decrease in morphine equivalents in the patient cohort undergoing ESPB catheter placement, this was not found to be statistically significant (284.3 ± 244.8 versus 412.6 ± 622.2, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: While ESPB catheters are frequently utilized for analgesia in the setting of multiple rib fractures, there was no decrease in total opioid usage when compared with patients who were managed with a multimodal pain regimen alone. Further assessment comparing ESPB catheters to best practice multimodal pain control regimens through a prospective, multicenter trial is required to further validate these findings.

Ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) for acute scapula fracture in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Proper pain in acute scapular fractures can be challenging to achieve due to their anatomy and location. While the current mainstay of treatment relies on opioids, the Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) has been utilized for anesthesia to effectively treat pain for scapular fractures. However, it has not yet been utilized in the emergency department (ED). CASE REPORT: In this case report, we present the first documented use of RIB to treat pain safely and effectively in a 69-year-old male with a scapula fracture following a ground-level fall in the ED. The RIB was performed under ultrasound guidance, providing precise localization and administration of the nerve block. CONCLUSION: The RIB demonstrated successful pain management in the ED. Although hopeful, further research is needed to understand limitations, potential side effects, length of pain control, and overall clinical outcomes of the RIB in the ED.

Pain management for hospitalized patients with rib fractures: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Rib fractures (RF) are common injuries. Multiple analgesia strategies are available for treatment of pain associated with RF. However, the optimal multimodal technique for pain management is not known. The primary aim of this review was to evaluate the status of evidence derived from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of pain management modalities for rib fracture pain. Other patient-centered outcomes were secondary objectives. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. The screening process involved two phases, two researchers independently screened the title and abstract and subsequently screened full text. RCT data were extracted independently by two research team members. Consensus was achieved by comparison and discussion when needed. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. RESULTS: A total of 1344 citations were identified. Title and abstract screening excluded 1128 citations, and full text review excluded 177 articles. A total of 32 RCTs were included in the full review. Multiple analgesia techniques and medications were identified and their effect on pain score and need for rescue opioid analgesia. None of the included studies were judged to have a high risk of bias, while only 10 studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found that studies are of low quality with diverse methodologies and outcomes. A reduction in pain scores was found for epidural analgesia when compared with other modalities. However, the low quality of the evidence necessitates cautious interpretation of this finding. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376298 (Nov, 16, 2022).