RESUMO
Patient falls within the hospital setting continue to be a significant challenge globally with almost one million hospital falls occurring in the U.S. annually. Recent calculations showed that the average total cost of a hospitalized patient fall was $62,521. One evidenced-based tool that has been shown to be effective is a colorful laminated poster, Fall TIPS poster, that was designed to engage and involve the patient in their fall prevention. One academic medical center utilized this implementation showing a successful return on investment (ROI). This project used a pre-post implementation design. After a successful pilot using the poster on one unit, the implementation was spread to all Adult Acute Care units (n = 10) within the institution. The outcome measures were fall and fall with injury counts and rates. The process measure was the completion of the fall prevention poster measured via audits. The calculation of ROI was completed using a four-step framework. The outcome data of fall and fall with injury showed a decrease from the pre-intervention months with both the fall count and rate decreasing by 23% and the fall with injury count and rate decreasing by 40%. The overall ROI calculation estimated an ROI of $982,700. The successful results from this project support the evidence that shows this program and the use of the Fall TIPS poster helps reduce patient falls within the hospital and yields a favorable ROI.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Acidentes por Quedas/economia , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health economic evaluation studies (e.g., cost-effectiveness analysis) can provide insight into which injury prevention interventions maximize available resources to improve health outcomes. A previous systematic review summarized 48 unintentional injury prevention economic evaluations published during 1998-2009, providing a valuable overview of that evidence for researchers and decisionmakers. The aim of this study was to summarize the content and quality of recent (2010-2019) economic evaluations of unintentional injury prevention interventions and compare to the previous publication period (1998-2009). METHODS: Peer-reviewed English-language journal articles describing public health unintentional injury prevention economic evaluations published January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 were identified using index terms in multiple databases. Injury causes, interventions, study methods, and results were summarized. Reporting on key methods elements (e.g., economic perspective, time horizon, discounting, currency year, etc.) was assessed. Reporting quality was compared between the recent and previous publication periods. RESULTS: Sixty-eight recent economic evaluation studies were assessed. Consistent with the systematic review on this topic for the previous publication period, falls and motor vehicle traffic injury prevention were the most common study subjects. Just half of studies from the recent publication period reported all key methods elements, although this represents an improvement compared to the previous publication period (25 %). CONCLUSION: Most economic evaluations of unintentional injury prevention interventions address just two injury causes. Better adherence to health economic evaluation reporting standards may enhance comparability across studies and increase the likelihood that this type of evidence is included in decision-making related to unintentional injury prevention.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Gestão da Segurança , Ferimentos e Lesões , Acidentes por Quedas/economia , Acidentes de Trânsito/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/tendências , Humanos , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controleRESUMO
The ALARP principle, stating that risks should be reduced to a level "As Low As Reasonably Practicable", is widely known and discussed in risk management. The principle is flexible, as the interpretation of the key concepts of reasonable and practicable can be adapted to different contexts. This paper discusses whether the use of road safety measures on national roads in Norway can be interpreted as an informal application of the ALARP-principle. According to official guidelines, priority setting for major road investments should be based on cost-benefit analysis. Most road safety measures are low-cost projects that have traditionally not been subject to cost-benefit analysis. A use of these measures regarded as reasonable in the ALARP sense may include considerations of cost, efficiency and fair distribution. Data on 328 road safety measures implemented around 2000 is used to evaluate factors influencing their use. It is argued that the use of these measures is consistent with an informal application of the ALARP-principle.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Ambiente Construído/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , NoruegaRESUMO
The need for continuous observation (1:1) of patients for safety precautions, including fall risk, elopement risk, confusion, and aggressive behavior, is highly variable, and it is therefore difficult to plan accurate staffing levels. The high variability in determining when 1:1 staffing for safety is indicated, and for how long, leads to resource strain and high cost to the hospital. A multidisciplinary team analyzed current processes for assigning, monitoring, and discontinuing safety 1:1 care for nonsuicidal patients using Six Sigma methodologies. The team implemented a standardized weaning process to reduce the duration of time on continuous observation and a standardized 4-hour reassessment using a behavior observation-tracking tool to validate the continued need for 1:1 coverage. The interventions resulted in reducing average monthly safety 1:1 staffing hours by 25.6% and saving an estimated $142 000 annually across 6 units. Phase 2 of the project integrated the observation-tracking tool and reassessment check-in into the hospital's electronic medical record for improved tracking and documentation.
Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/economia , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Segurança do Paciente/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Gestão da Qualidade Total/organização & administração , Eficiência Organizacional , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
Traffic injuries remain a leading health concern in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, most LMICs have not established institutions that have the legislative mandate and financial resources necessary to coordinate large-scale interventions. Argentina provides a counterexample. Argentina is a federal country where the decentralization of authority to provincial governments was a key barrier to effective national interventions. In 2008, Argentina passed a law establishing a national road safety agency and subsequently received a World Bank loan to build the agency's capacity to coordinate actions. Although traffic injuries in Argentina have not yet begun to decline, these developments raise important questions:Why did Argentina come to view road safety as aproblem?Why was institutional reform the chosen solution? What was the political process for achieving reform? What are the broader implications for institutional reform in LMICs?We explore these questions using a descriptive case study (single-case, holistic design) of Argentina. The case illustrates that focusing events, like the Santa Fe tragedy that killed nine children, and advocacy groups are important for raising political attention and creating an opportunity for legislative reform. It highlights the importance of policy entrepreneurs who used the opportunity to push through new legislation. Though the political dynamic was predominantly local, international actors worked with local advocates to build demand for safety and develop solutions that could be deployed when the opportunity arose. Most important, the case emphasizes the importance of developing institutions with the resources and authority necessary for managing national road safety programs.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Argentina/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Planejamento Ambiental/economia , Planejamento Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Política , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/legislação & jurisprudência , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidadeRESUMO
Road authorities have to prioritize safety improvement projects due to budget limitations. This process needs to estimate expected benefits (reduction in average crash frequency) and costs of projects. Due to variances of crash modification factor (CMF), crash frequency and cost of projects, prediction of costs and benefits would be accompanied by uncertainty and it can subsequently lead to a wrong decision making. To deal with the inherent uncertainty in the decision making process, this paper presents a ranking approach based on integration of Data Envelopment Analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation. A Monte-Carlo simulation is applied to generate stochastic values as input and outputs of the problem instead of running DEA model just for deterministic case. Data from an existing case study is used to evaluate the performance of the proposed methodology. Numerical results indicate that DEA results are very sensitive to data uncertainty and uncertainties can have great influence in ranking results of road safety improvement projects especially when both input and output data are uncertain. It also indicates that how the proposed methodology can be useful for detecting sensitive decision-making units and providing a more comprehensive view for decision makers to allocate a limit budget to the most efficient safety improvement projects.
Assuntos
Ambiente Construído/economia , Tomada de Decisões , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Acidentes de Trânsito/economia , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Método de Monte CarloRESUMO
Falls and injurious falls are a major safety concern for patient care in acute care hospitals. Inpatient falls and injurious falls can cause extra financial burden to patients, families, and healthcare facilities. This article provides clinical implications and recommendations for adult inpatient fall and injurious fall prevention through a brief review of factors associated with falls and injurious falls and current fall prevention practices in acute care hospitals.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Acidentes por Quedas/economia , Doença Aguda , Hospitais Comunitários , Hospitais Gerais , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente/economia , Gestão de Riscos/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Contractor selection is one of the major concerns of industry managers such as those in the oil industry. The objective of this study was to determine a contractor selection pattern for oil and gas industries in a safety approach. Assessment of contractors based on specific criteria and ultimately selecting an eligible contractor preserves the organizational resources. Due to the safety risks involved in the oil industry, one of the major criteria of contractor selection considered by managers today is safety. The results indicated that the most important safety criterion of contractor selection was safety records and safety investments. This represented the industry's risks and the impact of safety training and investment on the performance of other sectors and the overall organization. The output of this model could be useful in the safety risk assessment process in the oil industry and other industries.
Assuntos
Contratos , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Modelos Teóricos , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/economiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Among others, the German National Prevention Conference recently recommended the provision of preventive options for elderly to maintain their independent living. Because a home safety assessment and modification program (HSM) has shown to be effective in avoiding falls and risk of falling in elderly, the aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HSM in patients aged ≥ 80 years who receive non-institutionalized long-term care. METHODS: In order to reflect quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs resulting from HSM, a Markov-model with a time horizon of 20 years was performed from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI) and statutory long-term care insurance (LCI). The model assumed that HSM reduces fall-related hip fractures in accordance with the reduction of the rate of falls. Data was obtained from public databases and from various literature searches. The robustness of the results was assessed in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In women, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HSM compared to no prevention was 9580 per QALY, while in men, it was 57,589. For the German SHI/LCI, in total, the provision of HSM to patients ≥ 80 years who receive non-institutionalized long-term care would result in annual costs of 7.7 million. The results were robust in several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that the rate of falls is a valid surrogate endpoint for the rate of fall-related hip fractures, HSM could be a promising approach for investments in preventive options targeting the reduction of fall-related fractures in elderly women.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/economia , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Quadril/economia , Vida Independente/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Alemanha , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
With the movement toward at-risk population health management-related payment models, a core factor for the success and survival of health care organizations has become understanding and decreasing costs. In medical specialties such as radiology, understanding models for procedure-based costing will become increasingly important. Using bottom-up models for procedure-based costing, such as time-driven activity-based costing, is more advantageous than using the inaccurate ratio of costs to charges approach; however, these approaches are more resource intensive when compared to top-down approaches. Understanding the costs of quality is also important for creating an accounting and budgeting process that reflects the total cost of quality. The costs of quality are divided into two main categories: the cost of control (also referred to as the costs of conformance) and the costs of failure of control (also referred to as the costs of nonconformance). The costs of control are the expenditures that occur to ensure quality. The costs of noncontrol are the expenses that arise from the lack of quality and safety. The cost of control has two subcategories: prevention costs and appraisal costs. The cost of noncontrol also has two subcategories: internal failure costs and external failure costs. Adopting a mind-set that takes into account the costs of control, or the costs to ensure high-quality care, and the costs of noncontrol, or the hidden costs of poor-quality care, will be essential for successful health care organizations in the future. ©RSNA, 2018.
Assuntos
Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Modelos OrganizacionaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether investment in preventive measures by a Colombian insurer reduces rates of work-related injuries and results in positive returns from these investments. METHODS: The study is based on monthly panel data of 2011-2015 of 303 medium and large companies affiliated with a private insurer in Colombia. We undertook regression modeling analysis to assess the effectiveness of incremental investments in occupational health and safety (OHS) prevention measures. The cost-benefit analysis is from the insurer's perspective. RESULTS: Investment in OHS per full-time equivalent was statistically significant at the 1% level. We estimated that 4919 injuries were averted through these investments, resulting in the avoidance of $3 949 957 in costs. Our results suggest that the investments were worth undertaking from the insurer's perspective. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides new empirical evidence on the effectiveness and cost-benefit of OHS investments in a middle-income country. Incremental investment in OHS can be effective and cost-beneficial.
Assuntos
Seguradoras/economia , Investimentos em Saúde/economia , Saúde Ocupacional/economia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Colômbia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/prevenção & controleRESUMO
A wealth of research now exists surrounding use of the WHO surgical safety checklist. This paper reviews the literature regarding checklist use in developing countries. Results identify a lack of available literature specific to developing countries despite this potentially being where the greatest impact could be observed. Unique challenges of checklist use are discussed and opportunities for future research focusing on use of the checklist in developing countries suggested.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pobreza , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and incremental net cost of a fall prevention intervention that involved hourly rounding by RNs at 2 hospitals. BACKGROUND: Minimizing in-hospital falls is a priority, but little is known about the value of fall prevention interventions. METHODS: We used an uncontrolled before-after design to evaluate changes in fall rates and time use by RNs. Using decision-analytical models, we estimated incremental net costs per hospital per year. RESULTS: Falls declined at 1 hospital (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.87; P = .016), but not the other (IRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.17; P = .28). Cost analyses projected a 67.9% to 72.2% probability of net savings at both hospitals due to unexpected declines in the time that RNs spent in fall-related activities. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating fall prevention into hourly rounds might improve value. Time that RNs invest in implementing quality improvement interventions can equate to sizable opportunity costs or savings.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Enfermagem Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/organização & administração , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Acidentes por Quedas/economia , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , California , Custos e Análise de Custo , Enfermagem Baseada em Evidências/economia , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Método de Monte Carlo , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/economia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/normas , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The cost and risks of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, along with evidence of overuse, suggest that improving transfusion practices is a key opportunity for health systems to improve both the quality and value of patient care. Previous work, which included a BestPractice Advisory (BPA), was adapted in a quality improvement project designed to reduce both exposure to unnecessary blood products and costs. METHODS: A prospective, pre-post study was conducted at an academic medical center with a diverse patient population. All noninfant inpatients without gastrointestinal bleeding who were not within 12 hours of surgical procedures were included. The interventions were education, a BPA, and other enhancements to the computerized provider order entry system. RESULTS: The percentage of multiunit (≥ 2 units) RBC transfusions decreased from 59.9% to 41.7% during the intervention period and to 19.7% postintervention (p < 0.0001). The percentage of inpatient RBC transfusion units administered for hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 7 g/dL declined from 72.3% to 57.8% during the intervention period and to 38.0% for the postintervention period (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of inpatient RBC transfusion (units administered per 1,000 patient-days without exclusions) decreased from 89.8 to 78.1 during the intervention period and to 72.7 during the postintervention period (p <0.0001). The estimated annual cost savings was $1,050,750. CONCLUSION: The interventions reduced multiunit transfusions (by 67.1%) and transfusions for Hb ≥ 7 g/dL (by 47.4%). The improvement in the overall transfusion rate (19.0%) was less marked, limited by better baseline performance relative to other centers.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/organização & administração , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Análise Custo-Benefício , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/economia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/métodos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/organização & administração , Segurança do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) is a high morbidity and mortality zoonotic disease, which threatens poultry and human health. An outbreak of disease in China requires strict slaughter and disposal of all chickens within a three-kilometer radius, incurring large private costs for farmers and encouraging black market transactions. A stated preference survey of 331 farmers across six provinces in China was conducted in 2015, in order to measure the responsiveness of farmers to accept various compensation prices for safely disposing of HPAI infected chicken. Findings suggest that about 25% and 40% of farmers in South and North China respectively would not adopt safe disposal at the current compensation price (10 yuan/bird) offered by the government. However, 80% of farmers would adopt safe disposal if the compensation price increased to 14.1 yuan in South China and 18.9 yuan in North China. The adoption of safe disposal by farmers was positively and significantly influenced by compensation price (p=0.000) and regular contact with epidemic prevention staff (p=0.094). However, adoption was negatively and significantly influenced by net farm income (p=0.100) and chicken production income percentage (p=0.014). Although half of (51%) of farmers were willing to receive zero compensation, a reasonable compensation scheme along with strengthened supervision, may be considered the most effective strategy to encourage safe disposal of HPAI infected chicken and reduce the risks associated with black market transactions.
Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos/economia , Comércio/economia , Influenza Aviária/economia , Influenza Aviária/prevenção & controle , Orthomyxoviridae/isolamento & purificação , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Adulto , Criação de Animais Domésticos/métodos , Animais , Galinhas , China , Surtos de Doenças/economia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Fazendeiros , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aves Domésticas , Análise de Regressão , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Crew Resource Management (CRM) training has been used successfully within hospital units to improve quality and safety. This article presents a description of a health system-wide implementation of CRM focusing on the return on investment (ROI). The costs included training, programmatic fixed costs, time away from work, and leadership time. Cost savings were calculated based on the reduction in avoidable adverse events and cost estimates from the literature. Between July 2010 and July 2013, roughly 3000 health system employees across 12 areas were trained, costing $3.6 million. The total number of adverse events avoided was 735-a 25.7% reduction in observed relative to expected events. Savings ranged from a conservative estimate of $12.6 million to as much as $28.0 million. Therefore, the overall ROI for CRM training was in the range of $9.1 to $24.4 million. CRM presents a financially viable way to systematically organize for quality improvement.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Capacitação em Serviço/organização & administração , Cultura Organizacional , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Liderança , Modelos Econométricos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Injuries due to falls in the home impose a huge social and economic cost on society. We have previously found important safety benefits of home modifications such as handrails for steps and stairs, grab rails for bathrooms, outside lighting, edging for outside steps and slip-resistant surfacing for outside areas such as decks. Here we assess the economic benefits of these modifications. METHODS: Using a single-blinded cluster randomised controlled trial, we analysed insurance payments for medically treated home fall injuries as recorded by the national injury insurer. The benefits in terms of the value of disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted and social costs of injuries saved were extrapolated to a national level and compared with the costs of the intervention. RESULTS: An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out. Injury costs per time exposed to the modified homes compared with the unmodified homes showed a reduction in the costs of home fall injuries of 33% (95% CI 5% to 49%). The social benefits of injuries prevented were estimated to be at least six times the costs of the intervention. The benefit-cost ratio can be at least doubled for older people and increased by 60% for those with a prior history of fall injuries. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomised controlled trial to examine the benefits of home modification for reducing fall injury costs in the general population. The results show a convincing economic justification for undertaking relatively low-cost home repairs and installing safety features to prevent falls. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12609000779279.