Analyzing diversity, equity, and inclusion content on dermatology fellowship program websites.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have garnered increasing attention within medical education as there have been increased efforts to diversify the physician workforce among medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings. One way in which programs can improve their DEI initiatives and attract a more diverse pool of applicants is through DEI content on their graduate medical education websites. Prior studies characterizing the content and prevalence of DEI material on residency webpages have shown that dermatology residencies have relatively low levels of DEI content on their websites in which almost ¾ of all programs having no DEI content. Little is known, however, if similar findings are to be expected for the three main dermatology subspecialty fellowship program webpages: Dermatopathology, Pediatric Dermatology, and Micrographic Surgery and Dermatology Oncology. Fellowship programs were identified using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's online database of fellowship programs. Programs were evaluated on a standardized scoring system for five equally weighted criteria: fellowship-specific DEI webpage, DEI commitment statement, DEI initiatives (summer research opportunities for under-represented minorities, DEI council, etc.), link to the institution's DEI homepage, and information about bias training. The mean score among all programs was 12.5. Pediatric dermatology ranked the highest among all specialties, while Mohs ranked the lowest. A link to the institution's DEI homepage was the most prevalent factor accounting for 42.1% of all programs collected, whereas information about bias training and fellowship-associated DEI webpage were the least prevalent. The results of this study reveal an overall lack of DEI content across all dermatology subspecialties' webpages and represent an actionable area of improvement for fellowship directors to increase their DEI efforts to attract a diverse pool of applicants to their program.

Sociodemographic disadvantage in the burden of stress and academic performance in medical school: implications for diversity in medicine.

BACKGROUND: Nontraditional students bring to medicine inherent characteristics and perspectives that enrich the learning environment and contribute to expanding diversity in medicine. However, research has shown that these students, by virtue of their sociodemographic backgrounds, face unique challenges in medical education, which ultimately place them at a disadvantage compared to their peers. The purpose of this study is to explore relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, stress, and academic performance, in the context of outcomes that may be undermining efforts to diversify the physician workforce. METHODS: Using a retrospective observational cohort methodology, we examined institutional and USMLE exam performance data in conjunction with Perceived Stress Scale-4 survey results from six cohorts of students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV (n = 358). Using independent samples t-test, mean stress and academic performance were compared between four sociodemographic groups: first-generation college students, underrepresented in medicine (URM), socioeconomically disadvantaged, and age 30 + at matriculation. Results were considered significant where P ≤ .05. RESULTS: First-generation college students had significantly higher stress at the end of third year clerkships (mean 7.8 vs. 6.8, P* = .03). URM students had significantly lower scores on preclinical exams (mean 81.37 vs. 83.07, P* = .02). The students who were age 30 + at matriculation had significantly lower exam scores on all academic performance measures. CONCLUSION: Our results echo historic trends in academic performance for racial and ethnic minority students, and we present recent evidence of academic performance disparities based on age at matriculation. Residency program directors continue to use test scores as a primary metric to screen applicants and thus, poor academic performance has profound consequences on career trajectory. Finally, significantly higher stress in the first-generation students may be evidence of underlying psychological distress. Expanding the sociodemographic diversity among physicians, and by extension, medical students, has long been recognized as fundamental to addressing inequities in healthcare. However, results from our study suggest that aspects of medical education are unfavorable and disadvantageous for first-generation, URM, and older medical students. A deeper understanding of the interplay between sociodemographic characteristics and success in medical school is paramount as we pursue diversity in medicine.

A systematic review of barriers to pursuing careers in medicine among Black premedical students.

Among the various etiologies of the exclusion of Black male physicians from the healthcare workforce, it is critical to identify and examine the barriers in their trajectory. Given that most medical school matriculants graduate and pursue residency training, medical school admission has been identified as the primary impediment to a career in medicine. Thus, this work aims to identify barriers in the journey of primarily Black, and secondarily underrepresented minority, premedical students. A systematic review of the medical literature was conducted for articles pertaining to the undergraduate/premedical period, Black experiences, and the medical school application process. The search yielded 5336 results, and 13 articles were included. Most papers corroborated common barriers, such as financial/socioeconomic burdens, lack of access to preparatory materials and academic enrichment programs, lack of exposure to the medical field, poor mentorship/advising experiences, systemic and interpersonal racism, and limited support systems. Common facilitators of interest and interventions included increasing academic enrichment programs, improving mentorship and career guidance quality and availability, and improving access to and availability of resources as well as exposure opportunities. No article explicitly discussed addressing racism. There is a dearth of studies exploring the premedical stage-the penultimate point of entry into medicine. Though interest in becoming a physician may be present, multiple and disparate impediments restrict Black men's participation in medicine. Addressing the barriers Black and underrepresented minority premedical students face requires an awareness of how multiple systems work together to discriminate and restrict access to careers in medicine beyond the traditional pipeline understanding.

Underrepresented in Medicine Student Perspectives on the Selection of a Summer Research Program.

OBJECTIVES: Many summer research programs (SRPs) for URiM students exist; however, only a few have been established by otolaryngology programs, who have a unique opportunity to provide a diverse experience. We sought to assess URiM undergraduate student perspectives on the most valuable program features that influence decision-making and how this might be useful to otolaryngology programs seeking to establish pathway programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An externally facing REDCap survey composed of 37 questions in scaled, multiple-choice, and open-ended form. The survey was delivered to applicants via email over two time periods in April 2021 and February 2022. All survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and categorized according to demographic information, program features, and advertising mechanisms. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of our applicants self-identified as URiM. Over 60% experienced financial hardship, and 31% experienced educational hardship. The single most important feature when selecting a summer research program (SRP) was access to mentorship followed by clinical shadowing and research opportunities. When program features were aggregated into groups, institutional features were the most important, followed closely by funding features. Finally, students prefer to learn about SRPs through their university, followed by social media, despite many students learning about our program through other means. CONCLUSIONS: Paid programs with effective advertising, research, mentoring, and clinical shadowing are highly valued by URiM undergraduate students. Understanding student perspectives is critical for programs aiming to address the "leaky pipeline" while being deliberate in their support of underrepresented students. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 134:637-644, 2024.

Psychological and emotional experiences of participants in a medical school, early assurance admissions program targeting students from groups underrepresented in medicine.

BACKGROUND: There are growing number of pathway programs, with an early assurance of admission, that target undergraduate students from groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) to enable their competitiveness for and matriculation to medical school, including the Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program. The psychological and emotional experiences of students in these programs, however, have not been previously described. METHODS: Students from the summer 2021 cohort of the PASS program were interviewed using a structured set of questions that explored four specific areas: (i) the application process; (ii) the benefits and value of being in the PASS program; (iii) the emotional and psychological challenges and stresses of being in the PASS program; (iv) feelings and emotions about not taking the MCAT or having to interview at multiple schools. The transcribed, de-identified interviews were then subjected to a qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Students in PASS reported that the program was valuable to them in that it reduced the stress of the pre-medical process; relieved worry and anxiety surrounding the MCAT; enabled development of supportive relationships and provided meaningful exposures to the medical profession and biomedical research. Despite this, students reported feelings of imposterism, guilt, and fear of disappointing, along with varying degrees of regret over not taking the MCAT and not interviewing at more than one medical school. CONCLUSIONS: URiM and other marginalized students participating in early assurance admissions programs likely enter medical school with a range of positive and negative emotions as a result of their participation in these programs. These data can be used to inform the development of programing and other initiatives that further support the transition and success of these students in medical school.

Investigating the relationship between participation in the building infrastructure leading to diversity (BUILD) initiative and intent to pursue a science career: A cross-sectional analysis.

This paper presents an analysis of survey data to examine the association between supervised structured mentoring and students' intent to pursue a career in science. Data were collected from students in the 10 Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) research training programs, developed through grants from the National Institutes of Health. Propensity score matching and multinomial logistic regression demonstrated that exposure to BUILD programs-meaning participation in undergraduate research, receipt of mentoring from a primary mentor, and/or participation as a funded scholar and/or associate of each BUILD site's training program-was associated with increased intent to pursue a science career. These findings have implications for STEM program evaluation and practice in higher education.

Overcoming financial and social barriers during COVID-19: A medical student-led medical education innovation.

Background: Underrepresented minorities in medicine (URMM) may face financial and social limitations when applying to medical schools. The computer-based assessment for sampling personal characteristics (CASPER) test is used by many medical schools to assess the nonacademic competencies of applicants. Performance on CASPER can be enhanced by coaching and mentorship, which URMMs often lack, for affordability reasons, when applying to medical schools. Methods: The CASPER Preparation Program (CPP) is a free, online, 4-week program to help URMM prepare for the CASPER test. CPP features free medical ethics resources, homework and practice tests, and feedback from tutors. Two of CPPs major objectives include relieving URMM of financial burdens and increasing their accessibility to mentorship during the COVID-19 pandemic. A program evaluation was conducted using anonymous, voluntary postprogram questionnaires to assess CPPs efficacy in achieving the aforementioned objectives. Results: Sixty URMMs completed the survey. The majority of the respondents strongly agreed or agreed that CPP relieves students of financial burden (97%), is beneficial for applicants with low-socioeconomic statuses (98%), provides students with resources they could not afford (n = 55; 92%), and enables access to mentors during the pandemic (90%). Discussion: Pathway coaching programs, such as the CASPER Preparation Program, have the potential to offer URMMs mentorship and financial relief, and increase their confidence and familiarity with standardized admission tests to help them matriculate into medical schools.

Developing a Graduate Class on Synthetic Cells at a Minority Serving Institution: Lessons from the University of New Mexico.

This article describes the development, methodology, enrollment, and outcomes of a graduate technical elective course on synthetic cells and organelles offered at the University of New Mexico, a minority-majority institution, in Fall 2022. The course had a significant ethics component and took advantage of readily available, low cost, and no-cost teaching materials that are available online. The course was effective in attracting a diverse enrollment of graduate students and senior undergraduates, some of whom participated in a survey of their backgrounds and motivations after the course was over. The article also provides results from this survey. Courses such as the one described have the potential to increase access and participation in emerging fields of research and technology such as synthetic cells.

Diversifying faculty recruitment in biomedical sciences.

A wealth of data has consistently demonstrated that a diverse faculty maximizes productivity and innovation in the research enterprise and increases the persistence and success of groups that are underrepresented in STEM. While the diversity of students in graduate programs has steadily increased, faculty diversity, particularly in the biomedical sciences, continues to remain relatively flat. Several issues contribute to this mismatch between the pipeline and the professoriate including biases in search and hiring practices, lack of equity and equal opportunities for individuals from underrepresented backgrounds, and unwelcoming campus climates that lead to marginalization and isolation in academic life. A comprehensive approach that addresses these challenges is necessary for institutions of higher education to achieve their faculty diversity goals and create a climate where individuals from all groups feel welcomed and succeed. This article focuses on the first step in this approach-diversifying faculty recruitment through adopting search practices that generate an applicant pool that matches national availability, ensures equity in evaluation and hiring practices, and promotes inclusion and belonging in the hiring experience. These strategies have been recently used at the University of California, Irvine's School of Biological Sciences and while the long-term impact remains unknown, short-term outcomes in recruitment and hiring have demonstrated significant improvement over previous years.

Educating the next generation of cancer researchers: Evaluation of a cancer research partnership training program.

African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Hispanic (or Latinx), Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander groups are underrepresented in the biomedical workforce, which is one of the barriers to addressing cancer disparities among minority populations. The creation of a more inclusive biomedical workforce dedicated to reducing the burden of cancer health disparities requires structured, mentored research and cancer-related research exposure during the earlier stages of training. The Summer Cancer Research Institute (SCRI) is a multicomponent 8-week intensive summer program funded under the Partnership between a Minority Serving Institute and a National Institutes of Health-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. In this survey study, we found that students who participated in the SCRI Program reported greater knowledge and interest in pursuing careers in cancer-related fields than their counterparts who did not participate in SCRI. Successes, challenges, and solutions in providing training in cancer and cancer health disparities research to improve diversity in the biomedical fields were also discussed.

Increasing representation and diversity in health research: A protocol of the MYHealth research training program for high school students.

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of calls for increased diversity in the health research workforce, disparities exist for many populations, including Black, Indigenous, and People of Color individuals, those from low-income families, and first-generation college students. To increase representation of historically marginalized populations, there is a critical need to develop programs that strengthen their path toward health research careers. High school is a critically important time to catalyze interest and rebuild engagement among youth who may have previously felt excluded from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and health research careers. METHODS: The overall objective of the MYHealth program is to engage high school students in a community-based participatory research program focused on adolescent health. Investigators will work alongside community partners to recruit 9th through 12th graders who self-identify as a member of a group underrepresented in STEM or health research careers (e.g., based on race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, first generation college student, disability, etc.). MYHealth students are trained to be co-researchers who work alongside academic researchers, which will help them to envision themselves as scientists capable of positively impacting their communities through research. Implemented in three phases, the MYHealth program aims to foster a continuing interest in health research careers by developing: 1) researcher identities, 2) scientific literacy, 3) scientific self-efficacy, and 4) teamwork and leadership self-efficacy. In each phase, students will build knowledge and skills in research, ethics, data collection, data analysis, and dissemination. Students will directly collaborate with and be mentored by a team that includes investigators, community advisors, scientific advisors, and youth peers. DISCUSSION: Each year, a new cohort of up to 70 high school students will be enrolled in MYHealth. We anticipate the MYHealth program will increase interest and persistence in STEM and health research among groups that have been historically excluded in health research careers.

The US Supreme Court and Affirmative Action: The Negative Impact on the Physician Workforce.

PURPOSE: Maintaining admissions of underrepresented students to medical schools is essential to securing a diverse health care workforce. Empirical evidence indicates that minority patients may prefer practitioners of their own race. The recent US Supreme Court decision concerning affirmative action makes this goal more difficult, but medical schools can still work within the language of the law to redouble their efforts to seat a diverse class of medical students. METHODS: We examined the literature correlating the availability of minority physicians and the health outcomes of the patients they serve. We also examined the literature on race-conscious policies of medical schools intended to address the shortage of minority physicians considering the benefits achieved through a diverse field of health care workers. We also examined the law and the recent US Supreme Court opinion, including the application of equal protection principles, to suggest strategies to seat a diverse class of students within the scope of the law. FINDINGS: Institutions have maintained the status quo of disparate distributions of professions by race through structural biases that also limit access to medical schools. The new US Supreme Court decision is expected to exacerbate this disparity unless medical schools engage in admissions protocols that actively solicit the character and unique abilities that each of the applicants can offer to contribute to the medical school and the health care profession. IMPLICATIONS: The new US Supreme Court mandate is likely to create challenges for medical schools in their efforts to recruit and seat minority applicants. The mandate provides little discussion, suggesting a lack of understanding of the downstream public health consequences to patients if medical school applicants are denied the benefits of race-conscious admissions policies. Nevertheless, the language of the US Supreme Court's opinion may provide a viable path forward, at least with respect to medical schools where the need for a diverse pool of health care practitioners is particularly compelling.

US Postgraduate Trainee Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Representation and Faculty Compensation By Specialty.

This study compares postgraduate trainee racial, ethnic, and gender representation and faculty compensation for 21 clinical specialties using 2015-2022 data.

Implicit Association Test Alone Is Not Sufficient to Increase Underrepresented Minority Representation in Physician Assistant Programs.

PURPOSE: Physician assistant (PA) program matriculants are consistently less diverse than the US population. This study evaluates whether administration of an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to PA program admission committees is associated with changes in the likelihood of (1) receiving an admission interview, (2) receiving an offer of admission, and (3) matriculation of individuals underrepresented in medicine (URiM). METHODS: Admission committees from 4 PA programs participated in an IAT before the 2019/2020 admissions cycle. Applicant outcome data (n = 5796) were compared with 2018/2019 cycle (n = 6346). Likelihood of URiM students receiving offers to interview, offers of admission, and matriculation were evaluated using random effects multiple logistic regression models. Fully adjusted random effects models included URiM status, year (control vs. intervention), multiplicative interaction terms between URiM and year, applicant age, and undergraduate grade point average (GPA) Secondary analyses examined associations of each race/ethnicity individually. RESULTS: Underrepresented in medicine status, age, and GPA were significantly associated with all admission outcomes ( P < .05). The intervention effect was not statistically significant. In sensitivity analyses examining each individual race rather than URiM status, our results did not importantly differ. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest admission committee member participation in IAT before admissions had no significant impact on the likelihood of admission of URiM students. This may suggest that making individuals aware of their implicit biases is not, in and of itself, sufficient to meaningfully affect the diversity of PA program admission metrics.

Improving models for student retention and graduation using Markov chains.

Graduation rates are a key measure of the long-term efficacy of academic interventions. However, challenges to using traditional estimates of graduation rates for underrepresented students include inherently small sample sizes and high data requirements. Here, we show that a Markov model increases confidence and reduces biases in estimated graduation rates for underrepresented minority and first-generation students. We use a Learning Assistant program to demonstrate the Markov model's strength for assessing program efficacy. We find that Learning Assistants in gateway science courses are associated with a 9% increase in the six-year graduation rate. These gains are larger for underrepresented minority (21%) and first-generation students (18%). Our results indicate that Learning Assistants can improve overall graduation rates and address inequalities in graduation rates for underrepresented students.

Evaluation of Midlife Educational Attainment Among Attendees of a Comprehensive Early Childhood Education Program in the Context of Early Adverse Childhood Experiences.

Importance: Educational attainment is a key social determinant of health and can be particularly consequential for racial and ethnic minority populations. Although the consequences of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are well established, there is little research on protective factors and policy-relevant strategies to mitigate ACE-related inequities. Objective: To examine associations between early ACEs, comprehensive early intervention, and midlife educational attainment in a cohort of predominantly Black participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chicago Longitudinal Study is a prospective cohort study of Black and Latinx children from Chicago, Illinois. The intervention group included 989 children entering the Child-Parent Center (CPC) preschool Early Childhood Education (ECE) program in the 1980s. The comparison group comprised 550 children participating in usual early childhood services. All participants were followed up for 30 years after the end of the intervention. Analyses were conducted from July 1 to September 1, 2022. Intervention: Attendance at the CPC preschool ECE program. Main Outcomes and Measures: A standard battery of early childhood ACEs (conventional ACEs), a set of early childhood ACEs more commonly associated with high-poverty contexts (expanded ACEs), and educational attainment at 35 years of age were measured from self-report and administrative records. Results: The original Chicago Longitudinal Study sample comprised 1539 participants (1430 Black participants [92.9%]; 774 female participants [50.3%]). Data on educational attainment and ACEs were available for 1083 of 1467 living participants (73.8%). Participants in the present study (1013 Black participants [93.5%]; 594 female participants [54.9%]) were a mean (SD) age of 35.1 (0.3) years at completion of the midlife survey. For the comparison group but not the CPC intervention group, having 1 or more conventional or expanded ACEs in early childhood was associated with fewer years of education (ß = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.02 to -0.26), reduced likelihood of attaining a bachelor's degree or higher (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.70), and reduced likelihood of attaining an associate's degree or higher (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.62) after adjusting for covariates. Moderation analyses indicated that CPC participants with either conventional or expanded ACEs in early childhood attained a bachelor's degree or higher and an associate's degree or higher at rates similar to CPC participants without early ACEs (15.4% vs 13.6% for bachelor's degree or higher; 22.4% vs 19.9% for associate's degree or higher). Conversely, comparison group participants with early ACEs had significantly lower rates of educational attainment than their counterparts without ACEs (3.7% vs 12.1% for bachelor's degree or higher; 5.6% vs 17.1% for associate's degree or higher). Conclusions: This cohort study suggests that early ACEs were associated with reduced educational attainment for the comparison group but not for the group participating in the CPC comprehensive early intervention. These results build on research suggesting that youths at higher risk can benefit most from intervention and support ECE as a tool for reducing ACE-related disparities.

Individual and Institutional Factors Contribute to Research Capacity Building for Early-Stage Investigators from Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Enhancement of diversity within the U.S. research workforce is a recognized need and priority at a national level. Existing comprehensive programs, such as the National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) and Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI), have the dual focus of building institutional research capacity and promoting investigator self-efficacy through mentoring and training. METHODS: A qualitative comparative analysis was used to identify the combination of factors that explain the success and failure to submit a grant proposal by investigators underrepresented in biomedical research from the RCMI and non-RCMI institutions. The records of 211 participants enrolled in the NRMN Strategic Empowerment Tailored for Health Equity Investigators (NRMN-SETH) program were reviewed, and data for 79 early-stage, underrepresented faculty investigators from RCMI (n = 23) and non-RCMI (n = 56) institutions were included. RESULTS: Institutional membership (RCMI vs. non-RCMI) was used as a possible predictive factor and emerged as a contributing factor for all of the analyses. Access to local mentors was predictive of a successful grant submission for RCMI investigators, while underrepresented investigators at non-RCMI institutions who succeeded with submitting grants still lacked access to local mentors. CONCLUSION: Institutional contexts contribute to the grant writing experiences of investigators underrepresented in biomedical research.

Diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates.

Diversity is a critical component in the advancement of human endeavor in science. Students who complete their education and training at diverse schools can serve patients from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds and promote cross-cultural competence. However, developing a diverse environment of professionals is a long-term effort which often takes generations to complete. Increasing awareness of underrepresented genders and/or minorities helps to establish goals for building a future of improved diversity. Specific to radiation oncology, professions such as medical physicists and radiation oncology physicians have reported underrepresented females and minorities. The problem is that there is a paucity of literature regarding diversity of medical dosimetry professionals. The professional organization does not track diversity data for those members currently working in the profession. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to present aggregate data demonstrating the diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates. The methodology involved quantitative data collection from medical dosimetry program directors which answered the research question, what is the diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates? In comparison to the U.S. population, there were less applicant and accepted students of Hispanic/Latino and African American ethnicities whereas the Asian population was higher. While the U.S. population data reveals 3% more females, there were 35% more female than male applicant and accepted students in this study. However, the results differ significantly from medical physics and radiation oncology physicians with only 30% female clinicians.

Medical student specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. Part 2: Role of race/ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: Although individuals underrepresented in medicine (URM) make up 33% of the United States population, only 12.6% of medical school graduates identify as URM; the same percentage of URM students comprises neurosurgery residency applicants. More information is needed to understand how URM students are making specialty decisions and their perceptions of neurosurgery. The authors aimed to evaluate the differences between URM and non-URM medical students and residents in terms of the factors that contribute to specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. METHODS: A survey was administered to all medical students and resident physicians at a single Midwestern institution to assess factors influencing medical student specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. Likert scale responses converted to numerical values on a 5-point scale (strongly agree was the high score of 5) were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test. The chi-square test was performed on the binary responses to examine associations between categorical variables. Semistructured interviews were conducted and analyzed using the grounded theory method. RESULTS: Of 272 respondents, 49.2% were medical students, 51.8% were residents, and 11.0% identified as URM. URM medical students considered research opportunities more than non-URM medical students in specialty decision-making (p = 0.023). When specialty decision-making factors were assessed, URM residents less strongly considered the technical skill required (p = 0.023), their perceived fit in the field (p < 0.001), and seeing people like them in the field (p = 0.010) than their non-URM counterparts when making specialty decisions. Within both medical student and resident respondent cohorts, the authors found no significant differences between URM and non-URM respondents in terms of their specialty decision-making being affected by medical school experiences such as shadowing, elective rotations, family exposure, or having a mentor in the field. URM residents were more concerned about the opportunity to work on health equity issues in neurosurgery than non-URM residents (p = 0.005). The predominant theme that emerged from interviews was the need for more intentional efforts to recruit and retain URM individuals in medicine and specifically neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: URM students may make specialty decisions differently than non-URM students. URM students were more hesitant toward neurosurgery due to their perceived lack of opportunity for health equity work in neurosurgery. These findings further inform optimization of both new and existing initiatives to improve URM student recruitment and retention in neurosurgery.