Trends in home dialysis use differ among age categories in past two decades: A Dutch registry study.

BACKGROUND: Although the number of patients with end-stage kidney disease is growing, the number of patients who perform dialysis at home has decreased during the past two decades. The aim of this study was to explore time trends in the use of home dialysis in the Netherlands. METHODS: Dialysis episodes of patients who started dialysis treatment were studied using Dutch registry data (RENINE). The uptake of home dialysis between 1997 through 2016 was evaluated in time periods of 5 years. Home dialysis was defined as start with peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis, or transfer to either within 2 years of dialysis initiation. All analyses were stratified for age categories. Mixed model logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for clustering at patient level. RESULTS: A total of 33 340 dialysis episodes in 31 569 patients were evaluated. Mean age at dialysis initiation increased from 62.5 ± 14.0 to 65.5 ± 14.5 years in in-centre haemodialysis patients, whereas it increased from 51.9 ± 15.1 to 62.5 ± 14.6 years in home dialysis patients. In patients <65 years, the uptake of home dialysis was significantly lower during each 5-year period compared with the previous period, whereas kidney transplantation occurred more often. In patients ≥65 years, the incidence of home dialysis remained constant, whereas mortality decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In patients <65 years, the overall use of home dialysis declined consistently over the past 20 years. The age of home dialysis patients increased more rapidly than that of in-centre dialysis patients. These developments have a significant impact on the organization of home dialysis.

Lessons Learnt during the COVID-19 Pandemic: For Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease, We Should Prioritize Home-Based Treatment and Telemedicine.

BACKGROUNDS: The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (CO-VID-19) pandemic has placed worldwide health systems and hospitals under pressure, and so are the renal care models. This may be a unique opportunity to promote and expand alternative models of health-care delivery in patients undergoing renal replacement therapies. SUMMARY: Despite the high risk of acquiring communicable diseases when undergoing in-centre treatments, only a small proportion of patients are currently being treated with home therapies. Recent data provided by the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN), the REIN French Registry and the Wuhan Hemodialysis Quality Control Center clearly show that patients receiving hospital-based treatment have a 3- to 4-fold greater risk of infection, and a subsequent fatality proportion between 21 and 34%. On the other hand, home-based therapy can be managed remotely, there is little or no need for transport to and from the hospital, and it is less expensive. Besides, the digital revolution in health care with the development of virtual care systems can make home dialysis with telehealth a cost-effective solution for both patients and health-care providers. Such a transition would require specific training for physicians and health-care professionals and a functional re-organization of dialysis centres to improve the skills and expertise in caring for patients at home. CONCLUSION: The need for more widespread home treatment is the main lesson learnt by nephrologists by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Telehealth for Home Dialysis in COVID-19 and Beyond: A Perspective From the American Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Home Dialysis Subcommittee.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, technological advancements, regulatory waivers, and user acceptance have converged to boost telehealth activities. Due to the state of emergency, regulatory waivers in the United States have made it possible for providers to deliver and bill for services across state lines for new and established patients through Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)- and non-HIPAA-compliant platforms with home as the originating site and without geographic restrictions. Platforms have been developed or purchased to perform videoconferencing, and interdisciplinary dialysis teams have adapted to perform virtual visits. Telehealth experiences and challenges encountered by dialysis providers, clinicians, nurses, and patients have exposed health care disparities in areas such as access to care, bandwidth connectivity, availability of devices to perform telehealth, and socioeconomic and language barriers. Future directions in telehealth use, quality measures, and research in telehealth use need to be explored. Telehealth during the public health emergency has changed the practice of health care, with the post-COVID-19 world unlikely to resemble the prior era. The future impact of telehealth in patient care in the United States remains to be seen, especially in the context of the Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative.

Variability and trends over time and across centres in haemodialysis weekly duration in Australia and New Zealand.

AIM: Haemodialysis treatment prescription varies widely internationally. This study explored patient- and centre-level characteristics associated with weekly haemodialysis hours. METHODS: Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry data were analysed. Characteristics associated with weekly duration were evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression models with patient- and centre-level covariates as fixed effects, and dialysis centre and state as random effects using the 2017 prevalent in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD) and home haemodialysis (HHD) cohorts. Evaluation of patterns of weekly duration over time analysed the 2000 to 2017 incident ICHD and HHD cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 12 494 ICHD and 1493 HHD prevalent patients in 2017 were included. Median weekly treatment duration was 13.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) hours for ICHD and 16 (IQR 15-20) hours for HHD. Male sex, younger age, higher body mass index, arteriovenous fistula/graft use, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethnicity and longer dialysis vintage were associated with longer weekly duration for both ICHD and HHD. No centre characteristics were associated with duration. Variability in duration across centres was very limited in ICHD compared with HHD, with variation in HHD being associated with state. Duration did not vary significantly over time for ICHD, whereas longer weekly HHD treatments were reported between 2006 and 2012 compared with before and after this period. CONCLUSION: This study in the Australian and New Zealand haemodialysis population showed that weekly duration was primarily associated with patient characteristics. No centre effect was demonstrated. Practice patterns seemed to differ across states/countries, with more variability in HHD than ICHD.

Diálise peritoneal domiciliar: interlocuções entre usuários e serviços da rede de atenção à saúde / Home peritoneal dialysis: interlocations between users and health care network services

Objetivo: Compreender as interlocuções entre os usuários que realizam a diálise peritoneal domiciliar e os serviços da Rede de Atenção à Saúde. Método: pesquisa qualitativa realizada com 19 pessoas em tratamento dialítico distribuídas em três grupos amostrais conforme o método da Grounded Theory. Análise através da codificação aberta, axial e seletiva. Resultado: o contexto assistencial expõe a descontinuidade do cuidado dialítico nas esferas da atenção primária e hospitalar, analisada pela categoria "Realizando a Diálise Peritoneal no domicílio, estando inserido na Rede de Atenção à Saúde". Conclusão: na ótica dos entrevistados a principal interlocução é com o serviço de terapia renal substitutiva, principal referência para o cuidado e intercorrências com a dialise domiciliar. As interlocuções com os outros pontos assistenciais da Rede visam obter serviços de apoio, não implicados com o procedimento de dialise peritoneal domiciliar

Objective: To understand the interlocutions between users who perform peritoneal dialysis at home and the services of the Health Care Network. Method: qualitative research carried out with 19 people undergoing dialysis treatment distributed in three sample groups according to the Grounded Theory method. Analysis through open, axial and selective coding. Result:the care context studied exposes the discontinuity of dialysis care in the spheres of primary and hospital care, analyzed by the category "Performing Peritoneal Dialysis at home, being inserted in the Health Care Network". Conclusion: from theinterviewees' point of view, the main dialogue is with the renal replacement therapy service, the main reference for care and complications with home dialysis. The interlocutions with the other assistance points of the Network aim to obtain support services, not involved with the peritoneal dialysis procedure at home

Objetivo: Comprender las interlocuciones entre usuarios que realizan diálisis peritoneal en el hogar y los servicios de Health Care Network. Método: investigación cualitativa realizada con 19 personas sometidas a tratamiento de diálisis distribuidas en tres grupos de muestra según el método de la teoría fundamentada. Análisis mediante codificación abierta, axial y selectiva. Resultado: el contexto de atención estudiado expone la discontinuidad de la atención de diálisis en las esferas de atención primaria y hospitalaria, analizada por la categoría "Realización de diálisis peritoneal en el hogar, que se inserta en la red de atención médica". Conclusión:Para los entrevistados, la interlocución principal es con el servicio de terapia de reemplazo renal, la principal referencia para la atención y las complicaciones con la diálisis en el hogar. Las interlocuciones con los otros puntos de asistencia de la Red apuntan a obtener servicios de apoyo, no involucrados en el procedimiento de diálisi

Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes (DOMESTICO): rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: More than 6200 End Stage Renal Disease patients in the Netherlands are dependent on dialysis, either performed at home or in a dialysis centre. Visiting a dialysis centre three times a week is considered a large burden by many patients. However, recent data regarding the effects of dialysis at home on quality of life, clinical outcomes, and costs compared with in-centre haemodialysis are lacking. METHODS: The Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes (DOMESTICO) is a nationwide, prospective, observational cohort study that will include adult patients starting with a form of dialysis. Health-related quality of life, as the primary outcome, clinical outcomes and costs, as secondary outcomes, will be measured every 3-6 months in patients on home dialysis, and compared with a control group consisting of in-centre haemodialysis patients. During a 3-year period 800 home dialysis patients (600 peritoneal dialysis and 200 home haemodialysis patients) and a comparison group of 800 in-centre haemodialysis patients will be included from 53 Dutch dialysis centres (covering 96% of Dutch centres) and 1 Belgian dialysis centre (covering 4% of Flemish centres). DISCUSSION: DOMESTICO will prospectively investigate the effect of home dialysis therapies on health-related quality of life, clinical outcomes and costs, in comparison with in-centre haemodialysis. The findings of this study are expected to ameliorate the shared decision-making process and give more guidance to healthcare professionals, in particular to assess which type of patients may benefit most from home dialysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DOMESTICO study is registered with the National Trial Register on (number: NL6519 , date of registration: 22 August 2017) and the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) (number: NL63277.029.17).

Changing ethnic and clinical trends and factors associated with successful home haemodialysis at Auckland District Health Board.

BACKGROUND: The health and diversity of the population in New Zealand (NZ) is changing under the influence of many socio-economic factors. This may have shifted the landscape of home haemodialysis (HHD). AIMS: To examine the demographic and clinical changes, determinants of HHD training and technique outcome and mortality between 2008 and 2015 at Auckland District Health Board, NZ. METHODS: We compared three incident cohorts of HHD patients between 2008 and 2015. Relevant factors, including demographic and clinical characteristics, training failure, technique failure and mortality were recorded. Factors associated with training and technique failure were examined by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 152 patients, 133 completed training, 13 (10%) experienced technique failure and 15 (11%) died. Significant changes in ethnicity (increased: Maori 1.7-fold, Asian 1.7-fold and Pasifika 1.4-fold; decreased: NZ European 2.7-fold, P = 0.001), and major comorbidities, ≥2 major comorbidities (1.8-fold increase, P = 0.03), diabetes (2.1-fold increase, P = 0.013) and heart failure (P = 0.04) were seen. HHD as first renal replacement therapy modality increased 15-fold (P = 0.0001) and training time increased by 4.5 weeks (P = 0.004). Death and technique failure were unchanged over time. Shorter training time, employment and lower C-reactive protein were associated with 'Successful HHD'. 'Unsuccessful HHD' patient characteristics differed by ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The HHD population has become more representative of the NZ population, but significantly more comorbid over time. Patient training time has increased, but mortality and technique failure remain stable. 'Successful HHD' is predicted by social and clinical factors, and 'unsuccessful HHD' may have different mechanisms in different patient groups.

Fewer hospitalizations and prolonged technique survival with home hemodialysis- a matched cohort study from the Swedish Renal Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients on home hemodialysis (HHD) exhibit superior survival compared with patients on institutional hemodialysis (IHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). There is a sparsity of reports comparing morbidity between HHD and IHD or PD and none in a European population. The aim of this study is to compare morbidity between modalities in a Swedish population. METHODS: The Swedish Renal Registry was used to retrieve patients starting on HHD, IHD or PD. Patients were matched according to sex, age, comorbidity and start date. The Swedish Inpatient Registry was used to determine comorbidity before starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) and hospital admissions during RRT. Dialysis technique survival was compared between HHD and PD. RESULTS: RRT was initiated with HHD for 152 patients; these were matched with 608 patients with IHD and 456 with PD. Patients with HHD had significantly lower annual admission rate and number of days in hospital. (median 1.7 admissions; 12 days) compared with IHD (2.2; 14) and PD (2.8; 20). The annual admission rate was significantly lower for patients with HHD compared with IHD for cardiovascular diagnoses and compared with PD for infectious disease diagnoses. Dialysis technique survival was significantly longer with HHD compared with PD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients choosing HHD as initial RRT spend less time in hospital compared with patients on IHD and PD and they were more likely than PD patients, to remain on their initial modality. These advantages, in combination with better survival and higher likelihood of renal transplantation, are important incentives for promoting the use of HHD.

A Perspective on the Current Status of Home Hemodialysis.

Most hemodialysis (HD) in Japan is based on the central dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS). With CDDS, there is an improvement in work efficiency, reduction in cost, and a reduction in regional and institutional differences in dialysis conditions. This has resulted in an improvement in the survival rate throughout Japan. However, as the number of cases with various complications increases, it is necessary to select the optimal dialysis prescription (including hours and frequency) for each individual in order to further improve survival rates. To perform intensive HD, home HD is essential, and various prescriptions have been tried. However, several challenges remain before widespread implementation of home HD can occur.

Methods We Currently Use for Home Hemodialysis Management.

There are approximately 1,330,000 chronic renal failure patients in Japan, and over 30,000 patients are introduced to dialysis therapy annually. By the end of 2015, there were over 320,000 dialysis patients in Japan. Various groups have been working hard to educate all people involved including the patient, their families, doctors, nurses, and caregivers on three important topics: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Recently, there has been a growing interest in home hemodialysis. Although peritoneal dialysis has existed in Japan for a long time, the number of peritoneal dialysis patients in Japan has not been increasing. Only 3% of the total number of dialysis treatments done here are peritoneal. Despite these circumstances, home hemodialysis therapy has been gaining attention in Japan, which is a big breakthrough. We are at the frontier of improving dialysis; however, introducing home hemodialysis has been a difficult obstacle to overcome. Here, we would like to present our methods of introducing home hemodialysis and how we have dealt with this challenge.

The Rise, Fall, and Resurgence of Home Hemodialysis.

Home hemodialysis (HD) was first introduced in the 1960s with a rapid increase in its use due to inability of dialysis units to accommodate patient demand. A sharp decline was subsequently seen with expanding outpatient dialysis facilities and changes in reimbursement policies. In the last decade, with emerging reports of benefits with home HD and more user-friendly equipment, there has been resurgence in home HD. However, home HD remains underutilized with considerable variations between and within countries. This paper will review the history of home HD, elaborate on its established benefits, identify some of the barriers in uptake of this modality and expand on potential strategies to overcome these barriers.

Recent Trends in Home Hemodialysis Therapy in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Home hemodialysis (HHD) is rapidly becoming more widespread because HHD programs enable patients to receive a sufficient dialysis dose to improve their quality of life and survival rate without compromising their lifestyle. SUMMARY: Although HHD in Japan has a long history, the 529 dialysis patients being treated with HHD as of the end of 2014 account for only 0.17% of all dialysis patients. HHD is well indicated for patients who are younger, male, and nondiabetic. The major HHD dialysis programs were provided 4-6 times per week for 3-5 h per session, and 79.3% of HDD patients showed treatment adequacy with a hemodialysis product >72. Key Messages: To expand HHD in Japan, several challenges must be overcome. First, the government should clearly state that home medicine is the way forward and incentivize facilities to provide, and patients to receive, HHD. Second, we need to establish a typical business model for HHD to include the supply of medical devices, collection of disposals, and development of a special machine for HHD.

The Evolution of Home HD - Meeting Modern Patient Needs.

Patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing conventional renal replacement therapy face high morbidities and inappropriately high mortality rates globally. Intensive home hemodialysis has emerged as an alternate form of renal replacement therapy with superior clinical outcomes. In order to describe the international trends in conducting home hemodialysis, we performed a cross-sectional survey of 25 centers reporting the global trends and practices of intensive home hemodialysis. While the practice of home hemodialysis has continued to evolve, similar logistical barriers exist around the world. The Global Forum for Home Hemodialysis was created to provide a user-centric manual to facilitate the delivery of this important mode of renal replacement therapy.

[Dialysis care in Germany - demand, outpatient care and challenges]. / Dialyseversorgung in Deutschland : Bedarf, Angebot und Herausforderungen.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis is the mostly used renal replacement therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease. The aim of the study was to analyze the present dialysis care system and to scrutinize future changes regarding the need of dialysis as well as the system of care. METHODS: The study is based on a structured literature search in Pubmed; selecting relevant studies by predefined criteria. Prevalence of ESRD and the share of nephrologists in outpatient care were modeled until 2020. Guideline-based interviews with experts including a two-round Delphi survey were conducted to identify options for action. RESULTS: The number of dialysis-dependent patients will increase by one fifth from 83,000 in 2013 to 100,000 in 2020 while the share of nephrologists in outpatient care will decrease by 8% simultaneously. Therefore, young nephrologists and team-building in dialysis care need to be promoted. Home therapy should be used more often to cover the increasing need of dialysis in the future. Besides changes in the structures of care, shared-decision-making needs to be strengthened. CONCLUSIONS: The study offers concrete options to strengthen outpatient care by nephrologists (a) and to use home therapy more often (b) in order to provide adequate and appropriate dialysis care until 2020.

Workforce development and models of care in home hemodialysis.

Creating and maintaining a successful home hemodialysis (HD) program is highly dependent on the workforce model and quality of staff. We describe the minimum staff required to start a home HD program (e.g., a clinical champion and lead nurse) and detail what additional workforce (e.g., renal technician, dietitian, psychologist, and others) may be necessary as the program evolves and expands. The goal of the program and allied staff should be to provide a seamless patient journey, a process that requires consideration of a patient recruitment strategy, a patient training pathway, thoughtful initiation of home HD, and development of support systems for routine care and emergencies at home. This module describes how care models are implemented at centers of excellence in various locations around the world, highlights the importance of an integrated care pathway, and describes workforce challenges that programs may encounter.

Systems to cultivate suitable patients for home dialysis.

The key to developing, initiating, and maintaining a strong home dialysis program is a fundamental commitment by the entire team to identify and cultivate patients who are suitable candidates to perform home dialysis. This process must start as early as possible in the disease trajectory, and must include a passionate and daily focus by physicians, nurses, social workers, and other members of the multidisciplinary team. This effort must be constant and sustained over months, with active promotion of home dialysis for suitable patients at every opportunity. Cultivation of suitable patients must become a defining and overarching mission for the entire program. This article reviews some of the components involved in this worthwhile effort and provides practical tips and links to resources.

The home hemodialysis hub: physical infrastructure and integrated governance structure.

An effective home hemodialysis program critically depends on adequate hub facilities and support functions and on transparent and accountable organizational processes. The likelihood of optimal service delivery and patient care will be enhanced by fit-for-purpose facilities and implementation of a well-considered governance structure. In this article, we describe the required accommodation and infrastructure for a home hemodialysis program and a generic organizational structure that will support both patient-facing clinical activities and business processes.