Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 9.580
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Care ; 62(6): 416-422, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: HCAHPS' 2008 initial public reporting, 2012 inclusion in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), and 2015 inclusion in Hospital Star Ratings were intended to improve patient experiences. OBJECTIVES: Characterize pre-COVID-19 (2008-2019) trends in hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores. RESEARCH DESIGN: Describe HCAHPS score trends overall, by phase: (1) initial public reporting period (2008-2013), (2) first 2 years of HVBP (2013-2015), and (3) initial HCAHPS Star Ratings reporting (2015-2019); and by hospital characteristics (HCAHPS decile, ownership, size, teaching affiliation, and urban/rural). SUBJECTS: A total of 3909 HCAHPS-participating US hospitals. MEASURES: HCAHPS summary score (HCAHPS-SS) and 9 measures. RESULTS: The mean 2007-2019 HCAHPS-SS improvement in most-positive-category ("top-box") responses was +5.2 percentage points/pp across all hospitals (where differences of 5pp, 3pp, and 1pp are "large," "medium," and "small"). Improvement rate was largest in phase 1 (+0.8/pp/year vs. +0.2pp/year and +0.1pp/year for phases 2 and 3, respectively). Improvement was largest for Overall Rating of Hospital (+8.5pp), Discharge Information (+7.3pp), and Nurse Communication (+6.5pp), smallest for Doctor Communication (+0.8pp). Some measures improved notably through phases 2 and 3 (Nurse Communication, Staff Responsiveness, Overall Rating of Hospital), but others slowed or reversed in Phase 3 (Communication about Medicines, Quietness). Bottom-decile hospitals improved more than other hospitals for all measures. CONCLUSIONS: All HCAHPS measures improved rapidly 2008-2013, especially among low-performing (bottom-decile) hospitals, narrowing the range of performance and improving scores overall. This initial improvement may reflect widespread, general quality improvement (QI) efforts in lower-performing hospitals. Subsequent slower improvement following the introduction of HVBP and Star Ratings may have reflected targeted, resource-intensive QI in higher-performing hospitals.


Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospitais/normas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Aquisição Baseada em Valor , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(2)2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719514

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In an era of safety systems, hospital interventions to build a culture of safety deliver organisational learning methodologies for staff. Their benefits to hospital staff are unknown. We examined the literature for evidence of staff outcomes. Research questions were: (1) how is safety culture defined in studies with interventions that aim to enhance it?; (2) what effects do interventions to improve safety culture have on hospital staff?; (3) what intervention features explain these effects? and (4) what staff outcomes and experiences are identified? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of published literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Health Business Elite and Scopus. We adopted a convergent approach to synthesis and integration. Identified intervention and staff outcomes were categorised thematically and combined with available data on measures and effects. RESULTS: We identified 42 articles for inclusion. Safety culture outcomes were most prominent under the themes of leadership and teamwork. Specific benefits for staff included increased stress recognition and job satisfaction, reduced emotional exhaustion, burnout and turnover, and improvements to working conditions. Effects were documented for interventions with longer time scales, strong institutional support and comprehensive theory-informed designs situated within specific units. DISCUSSION: This review contributes to international evidence on how interventions to improve safety culture may benefit hospital staff and how they can be designed and implemented. A focus on staff outcomes includes staff perceptions and behaviours as part of a safety culture and staff experiences resulting from a safety culture. The results generated by a small number of articles varied in quality and effect, and the review focused only on hospital staff. There is merit in using the concept of safety culture as a lens to understand staff experience in a complex healthcare system.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Cultura Organizacional , Gestão da Segurança , Humanos , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação no Emprego , Liderança , Melhoria de Qualidade
3.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 99(1): 363-375, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701153

RESUMO

Background: A timely diagnosis of dementia can be beneficial for providing good support, treatment, and care, but the diagnostic rate remains unknown and is probably low. Objective: To determine the dementia diagnostic rate and to describe factors associated with diagnosed dementia. Methods: This registry linkage study linked information on research-based study diagnoses of all-cause dementia and subtypes of dementias, Alzheimer's disease, and related dementias, in 1,525 participants from a cross-sectional population-based study (HUNT4 70+) to dementia registry diagnoses in both primary-care and hospital registries. Factors associated with dementia were analyzed with multiple logistic regression. Results: Among those with research-based dementia study diagnoses in HUNT4 70+, 35.6% had a dementia registry diagnosis in the health registries. The diagnostic rate in registry diagnoses was 19.8% among home-dwellers and 66.0% among nursing home residents. Of those with a study diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, 35.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.6-39.0) had a registry diagnosis; for those with a study diagnosis of vascular dementia, the rate was 25.8% (95% CI 19.2-33.3) and for Lewy body dementias and frontotemporal dementia, the diagnosis rate was 63.0% (95% CI 48.7-75.7) and 60.0% (95% CI 43.3-75.1), respectively. Factors associated with having a registry diagnosis included dementia in the family, not being in the youngest or oldest age group, higher education, more severe cognitive decline, and greater need for help with activities of daily living. Conclusions: Undiagnosed dementia is common, as only one-third of those with dementia are diagnosed. Diagnoses appear to be made at a late stage of dementia.


Assuntos
Demência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/epidemiologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Idoso , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ('pouch surgery') provides a chance to avoid permanent ileostomy after proctocolectomy, but can be associated with poor outcomes. The relationship between hospital-level/surgeon factors (including volume) and outcomes after pouch surgery is of increasing interest given arguments for increasing centralization of these complex procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the literature describing the influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of studies reporting outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. The MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched (1978-2022). Data on outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, readmission, operative approach, reconstruction, postoperative parameters, and pouch-specific outcomes (failure), were extracted. Associations between hospital-level/surgeon factors and these outcomes were summarized. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022352851). RESULTS: A total of 29 studies, describing 41 344 patients who underwent a pouch procedure, were included; 3 studies demonstrated higher rates of pouch failure in lower-volume centres, 4 studies demonstrated higher reconstruction rates in higher-volume centres, 2 studies reported an inverse association between annual hospital pouch volume and readmission rates, and 4 studies reported a significant association between complication rates and surgeon experience. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the growing body of evidence that supports centralization of pouch surgery to specialist high-volume inflammatory bowel disease units. Centralization of this technically demanding surgery that requires dedicated perioperative medical and nursing support should facilitate improved patient outcomes and help train the next generation of pouch surgeons.


Assuntos
Bolsas Cólicas , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Humanos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/efeitos adversos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9273, 2024 04 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653739

RESUMO

The presence of significant, unwarranted variation in treatment suggests that clinical decision making also depends on where patients live instead of what they need and prefer. Historically, high practice variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) has been documented. This study aimed to investigate current regional variation in surgical treatment for sciatica resulting from LDDD. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of all Dutch adults (>18 years) between 2016 and 2019. Demographic data from Statistics Netherlands were merged with a nationwide claims database, covering over 99% of the population. Inclusion criteria comprised LDDD diagnosis codes and relevant surgical codes. Practice variation was assessed at the level of postal code areas and hospital service areas (HSAs). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify variables associated with surgical treatment. Among the 119,148 hospital visitors with LDDD, 14,840 underwent surgical treatment. Practice variation for laminectomies and discectomies showed less than two-fold variation in both postal code and HSAs. However, instrumented fusion surgery demonstrated a five-fold variation in postal code areas and three-fold variation in HSAs. Predictors of receiving surgical treatment included opioid prescription and patient referral status. Gender differences were observed, with males more likely to undergo laminectomy or discectomy, and females more likely to receive instrumented fusion surgery. Our study revealed low variation rates for discectomies and laminectomies, while indicating a high variation rate for instrumented fusion surgery in LDDD patients. High-quality research is needed on the extent of guideline implementation and its influence on practice variation.


Assuntos
Discotomia , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral , Vértebras Lombares , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Discotomia/métodos , Laminectomia/métodos , Idoso , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Ciática/cirurgia , Ciática/epidemiologia
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 428, 2024 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact of the constantly evolving severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on the effectiveness of early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments is unclear. Here, we report characteristics and acute clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 treated with a monoclonal antibody (mAb; presumed to be sotrovimab) across six distinct periods covering the emergence and predominance of Omicron subvariants (BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5) in England. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Hospital Episode Statistics database from January 1-July 31, 2022. Included patients received a mAb delivered by a National Health Service (NHS) hospital as a day-case, for which the primary diagnosis was COVID-19. Patients were presumed to have received sotrovimab based on NHS data showing that 99.98% of COVID-19-mAb-treated individuals received sotrovimab during the study period. COVID-19-attributable hospitalizations were reported overall and across six distinct periods of Omicron subvariant prevalence. Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with severe renal disease and active cancer. RESULTS: Among a total of 10,096 patients, 1.0% (n = 96) had a COVID-19-attributable hospitalization, 4.6% (n = 465) had a hospital visit due to any cause, and 0.3% (n = 27) died due to any cause during the acute period. COVID-19-attributable hospitalization rates were consistent among subgroups, and no significant differences were observed across periods of Omicron subvariant predominance. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of COVID-19-attributable hospitalizations and deaths were low in mAb-treated patients and among subgroups. Similar hospitalization rates were observed whilst Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 were predominant, despite reported reductions in in vitro neutralization activity of sotrovimab against BA.2 and BA.5.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalização , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adulto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Adolescente
7.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 13(1): 2332670, 2024 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646911

RESUMO

This study aimed to provide data for the clinical features of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and the molecular characteristics of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from paediatric patients in China. We conducted a multi-centre prospective study for IPD in 19 hospitals across China from January 2019 to December 2021. Data of demographic characteristics, risk factors for IPD, death, and disability was collected and analysed. Serotypes, antibiotic susceptibility, and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) of pneumococcal isolates were also detected. A total of 478 IPD cases and 355 pneumococcal isolates were enrolled. Among the patients, 260 were male, and the median age was 35 months (interquartile range, 12-46 months). Septicaemia (37.7%), meningitis (32.4%), and pneumonia (27.8%) were common disease types, and 46 (9.6%) patients died from IPD. Thirty-four serotypes were detected, 19F (24.2%), 14 (17.7%), 23F (14.9%), 6B (10.4%) and 19A (9.6%) were common serotypes. Pneumococcal isolates were highly resistant to macrolides (98.3%), tetracycline (94.1%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (70.7%). Non-sensitive rates of penicillin were 6.2% and 83.3% in non-meningitis and meningitis isolates. 19F-ST271, 19A-ST320 and 14-ST876 showed high resistance to antibiotics. This multi-centre study reports the clinical features of IPD and demonstrates serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance of pneumococcal isolates in Chinese children. There exists the potential to reduce IPD by improved uptake of pneumococcal vaccination, and continued surveillance is warranted.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Infecções Pneumocócicas , Sorogrupo , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Humanos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Lactente , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Fatores de Risco , População do Leste Asiático
8.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 18: e77, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Safety Index (HSI) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) was adopted by most countries to evaluate the safety of hospitals against disasters. This study aimed to assess the status of hospital safety from disasters between 2016 and 2022 in Kermanshah province in Iran. METHODS: This is a retrospective longitudinal study which investigated HSI data from 23 hospitals. Data were gathered by Farsi Hospital Safety Index (FHSI) and analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The risk of hydro-meteorological (from 43.1 to 32.7) and biological hazards (51.3 to 35.5) significantly decreased. Although structural safety remained constant (from 67.8 to 70.1), nonstructural (from 51.5 to 71.2), and functional (from 47.1 to 71.2) safety scores increased significantly over study period. CONCLUSIONS: The findings revealed hospitals safety in Kermanshah province gradually improved. However, the health-care stakeholders should pay the necessary attention to improving the structural safety of hospitals.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Irã (Geográfico) , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Desastres/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Soc Sci Med ; 349: 116910, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653186

RESUMO

Countries increasingly rely on competition among hospitals to improve health outcomes. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the effect of competition on health outcomes in Germany. We examined the effect of hospital competition on quality of care, which is assessed using health outcomes (risk-adjusted in-hospital and post-hospitalization mortality and cardiac-related readmissions), focusing on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment. We obtained data on all hospital utilizations and mortality of 13.2% of the population from a large statutory health insurer and all AMI admission records from Diagnosis-Related Groups Statistic from 2015-19. We constructed the measures of hospital competition, which mitigates the possibility of endogeneity bias. The relationships between health outcomes and competition measures are estimated using linear probability models. Intense competition was associated with lower quality of care in terms of mortality and cardiac-related readmissions. Patients treated in hospitals facing high competition were 0.9 (1.2) percentage points more likely to die within 90 days (2 years) of admission, and 1.4 (1.6) percentage points more likely to be readmitted within 90 days (2 years) of discharge than patients treated in hospitals facing low competition. Our results indicate that hospital competition does not lead to better health outcomes for AMI patients in Germany. Therefore, additional measures are necessary to achieve quality improvement.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Competição Econômica/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
10.
Transfusion ; 64(5): 775-783, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38516758

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin (IG) therapy is widely used to treat primary and secondary immune deficiencies and as immunomodulatory agent for various disorders. There is great concern that shortages of IG may rise, potentially affecting medical treatment options. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An international survey was developed to study how intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are used and managed within hospitals in case of shortages. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted by the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. The survey was directed to hospital pharmacists and blood bank transfusion professionals and disseminated through members of the BEST Collaborative network. RESULTS: Survey respondents from institutions in the USA, Canada, Europe, Japan, and Australia (n = 13) confirmed that the primary specialties utilizing IG are neurology, hematology, and immunology. More than 60% of respondents reported IG supply shortages, but mitigation strategies were not well developed. DISCUSSION: As IG is the leading driver in plasma demand, more studies are needed to understand current and future demand for IG from the clinical perspective. Necessity lies in establishing clinical guidance to address shortages.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Austrália , Canadá , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Japão , Estados Unidos , Bancos de Sangue/provisão & distribuição , Bancos de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
JAMA ; 331(16): 1387-1396, 2024 04 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536161

RESUMO

Importance: Medicare's Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program will provide a health equity adjustment (HEA) to hospitals that have greater proportions of patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and that offer high-quality care beginning in fiscal year 2026. However, which hospitals will benefit most from this policy change and to what extent are unknown. Objective: To estimate potential changes in hospital performance after HEA and examine hospital patient mix, structural, and geographic characteristics associated with receipt of increased payments. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed all 2676 hospitals participating in the HVBP program in fiscal year 2021. Publicly available data on program performance and hospital characteristics were linked to Medicare claims data on all inpatient stays for dual-eligible beneficiaries at each hospital to calculate HEA points and HVBP payment adjustments. Exposures: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing program HEA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reclassification of HVBP bonus or penalty status and changes in payment adjustments across hospital characteristics. Results: Of 2676 hospitals participating in the HVBP program in fiscal year 2021, 1470 (54.9%) received bonuses and 1206 (45.1%) received penalties. After HEA, 102 hospitals (6.9%) were reclassified from bonus to penalty status, whereas 119 (9.9%) were reclassified from penalty to bonus status. At the hospital level, mean (SD) HVBP payment adjustments decreased by $4534 ($90 033) after HEA, ranging from a maximum reduction of $1 014 276 to a maximum increase of $1 523 765. At the aggregate level, net-positive changes in payment adjustments were largest among safety net hospitals ($28 971 708) and those caring for a higher proportion of Black patients ($15 468 445). The likelihood of experiencing increases in payment adjustments was significantly higher among safety net compared with non-safety net hospitals (574 of 683 [84.0%] vs 709 of 1993 [35.6%]; adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.89-2.20]) and high-proportion Black hospitals compared with non-high-proportion Black hospitals (396 of 523 [75.7%] vs 887 of 2153 [41.2%]; ARR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.29-1.51]). Rural hospitals (374 of 612 [61.1%] vs 909 of 2064 [44.0%]; ARR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.30-1.58]), as well as those located in the South (598 of 1040 [57.5%] vs 192 of 439 [43.7%]; ARR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.10-1.42]) and in Medicaid expansion states (801 of 1651 [48.5%] vs 482 of 1025 [47.0%]; ARR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.28]), were also more likely to experience increased payment adjustments after HEA compared with their urban, Northeastern, and Medicaid nonexpansion state counterparts, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Medicare's implementation of HEA in the HVBP program will significantly reclassify hospital performance and redistribute program payments, with safety net and high-proportion Black hospitals benefiting most from this policy change. These findings suggest that HEA is an important strategy to ensure that value-based payment programs are more equitable.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Economia Hospitalar , Equidade em Saúde , Medicare , Aquisição Baseada em Valor , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Elegibilidade Dupla ao MEDICAID e MEDICARE , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Equidade em Saúde/economia , Equidade em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/economia , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/economia , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/etnologia , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/etnologia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
Epilepsia ; 65(5): 1415-1427, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38407370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Understanding factors driving variation in status epilepticus outcomes would be critical to improve care. We evaluated the degree to which patient and hospital characteristics explained hospital-to-hospital variability in intubation and postacute outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries admitted with status epilepticus between 2009 and 2019. Outcomes included intubation, discharge to a facility, and 30- and 90-day readmissions and mortality. Multilevel models calculated percent variation in each outcome due to hospital-to-hospital differences. RESULTS: We included 29 150 beneficiaries. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 57-78), and 18 084 (62%) were eligible for Medicare due to disability. The median (IQR) percentages of each outcome across hospitals were: 30-day mortality 25% (0%-38%), any 30-day readmission 14% (0%-25%), 30-day status epilepticus readmission 0% (0%-3%), 30-day facility stay 40% (25%-53%), and intubation 46% (20%-61%). However, after accounting for many hospitals with small sample size, hospital-to-hospital differences accounted for 2%-6% of variation in all unadjusted outcomes, and approximately 1%-5% (maximally 8% for 30-day readmission for status epilepticus) after adjusting for patient, hospitalization, and/or hospital characteristics. Although many characteristics significantly predicted outcomes, the largest effect size was cardiac arrest predicting death (odds ratio = 10.1, 95% confidence interval = 8.8-11.7), whereas hospital characteristics (e.g., staffing, accreditation, volume, setting, services) all had lesser effects. SIGNIFICANCE: Hospital-to-hospital variation explained little variation in studied outcomes. Rather, certain patient characteristics (e.g., cardiac arrest) had greater effects. Interventions to improve outcomes after status epilepticus may be better focused on individual or prehospital factors, rather than at the inpatient systems level.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Readmissão do Paciente , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Estado Epiléptico/mortalidade , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Anesthesiology ; 140(6): 1098-1110, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412054

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial analgesia provides effective pain relief during labor. However, it is unclear whether neuraxial analgesia prevalence differs across U.S. hospitals. The aim of this study was to assess hospital variation in neuraxial analgesia prevalence in California. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed birthing patients who underwent labor in 200 California hospitals from 2016 to 2020. The primary exposure was the delivery hospital. The outcomes were hospital neuraxial analgesia prevalence and between-hospital variability, before and after adjustment for patient and hospital factors. Median odds ratio and intraclass correlation coefficients quantified between-hospital variability. The median odds ratio estimated the odds of a patient receiving neuraxial analgesia when moving between hospitals. The intraclass correlation coefficients quantified the proportion of the total variance in neuraxial analgesia use due to variation between hospitals. RESULTS: Among 1,510,750 patients who underwent labor, 1,040,483 (68.9%) received neuraxial analgesia. Both unadjusted and adjusted hospital prevalence exhibited a skewed distribution characterized by a long left tail. The unadjusted and adjusted prevalences were 5.4% and 6.0% at the 1st percentile, 21.0% and 21.2% at the 5th percentile, 70.6% and 70.7% at the 50th percentile, 75.8% and 76.6% at the 95th percentile, and 75.9% and 78.6% at the 99th percentile, respectively. The adjusted median odds ratio (2.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.5) indicated substantially increased odds of a patient receiving neuraxial analgesia if they moved from a hospital with a lower odds of neuraxial analgesia to one with higher odds. The hospital explained only a moderate portion of the overall variability in neuraxial analgesia (intraclass correlation coefficient, 19.1%; 95% CI, 18.8 to 20.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A long left tail in the distribution and wide variation exist in the neuraxial analgesia prevalence across California hospitals that is not explained by patient and hospital factors. Addressing the low prevalence among hospitals in the left tail requires exploration of the interplay between patient preferences, staffing availability, and care providers' attitudes toward neuraxial analgesia.


Assuntos
Analgesia Obstétrica , Humanos , California/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Gravidez , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Epidural/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Trabalho de Parto
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(6): 696-700, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224818

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated numerous hospital outbreaks. This study aimed to identify factors related to the extent of nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks in the largest French public health institution. METHODS: An observational study was conducted from July 2020 to September 2021. Outbreaks were defined as at least 2 cases, patients and/or health care workers (HCWs), linked by time and geographic location. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for large outbreaks among nine variables: variant, medical ward, COVID-19 vaccination rate and incidence among HCWs and Paris population, number of weekly COVID-19 tests among HCWs and the positivity rate, epidemic waves. RESULTS: Within 14 months, 799 outbreaks were identified: 450 small ones (≤6 cases) and 349 large ones (≥7 cases), involving 3,260 patients and 3,850 HCWs. In univariate analysis, large outbreaks were positively correlated to geriatrics wards, COVID-19 incidence, and rate of weekly positive tests among HCWs; and negatively correlated to intensive care units, variant Delta, fourth wave, vaccination rates of the Paris region's population and that of the HCWs. In multivariate analysis, factors that remained significant were the type of medical ward and the vaccination rate among HCWs. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care unit and high vaccination rates among HCWs were associated with a lower risk of large COVID-19 outbreaks, as opposed to geriatric wards, which are associated with a higher risk.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Surtos de Doenças , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , França/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Paris/epidemiologia
16.
Ann Ig ; 36(2): 234-249, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265640

RESUMO

Background: Improving the quality and effectiveness of healthcare is a key priority in health policy. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has exerted considerable pressure on hospital networks, requiring unprecedented reorganization and restructuring actions. This study analyzed data from the Italian National Outcomes Program to compare some volumes and outcomes of public and private accredited hospitals in the Lombardy Region with national data. Study design: Observational study. Methods: A thorough examination of hospital outcomes between 2019 and 2021 was conducted, considering 45 volume indicators and 48 process and outcome indicators, comparing Lombardy with other Italian regions and public versus private accredited hospitals. Results: In 2020, Italy and Lombardy experienced a considerable reduction in overall hospital admissions, with Lombardy showing a deeper decline (21.3% compared with 16.0% in Italy). In 2021, both experienced a partial recovery, especially marked in the Lombardy region (+7.3%, compared with national data). Focusing specifically on the private sector in Lombardy, a recovery of +9.3% in hospitalization was observed. In the analysis of clinical outcomes, Lombardy outperformed the national average for 63% of the indicators in 2020 and 83.3% in 2021. Conclusions: The study shows the continuing decline in volumes compared to 2019 (pre-COVID), the excellent performance of hospitals in Lombardy and a relevant contribution for the volumes and the quality of outcomes of private accredited hospitals.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/tendências , Itália , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
JAMA ; 331(2): 111-123, 2024 01 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193960

RESUMO

Importance: Equity is an essential domain of health care quality. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) developed 2 Disparity Methods that together assess equity in clinical outcomes. Objectives: To define a measure of equitable readmissions; identify hospitals with equitable readmissions by insurance (dual eligible vs non-dual eligible) or patient race (Black vs White); and compare hospitals with and without equitable readmissions by hospital characteristics and performance on accountability measures (quality, cost, and value). Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of US hospitals eligible for the CMS Hospital-Wide Readmission measure using Medicare data from July 2018 through June 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: We created a definition of equitable readmissions using CMS Disparity Methods, which evaluate hospitals on 2 methods: outcomes for populations at risk for disparities (across-hospital method); and disparities in care within hospitals' patient populations (within-a-single-hospital method). Exposures: Hospital patient demographics; hospital characteristics; and 3 measures of hospital performance-quality, cost, and value (quality relative to cost). Results: Of 4638 hospitals, 74% served a sufficient number of dual-eligible patients, and 42% served a sufficient number of Black patients to apply CMS Disparity Methods by insurance and race. Of eligible hospitals, 17% had equitable readmission rates by insurance and 30% by race. Hospitals with equitable readmissions by insurance or race cared for a lower percentage of Black patients (insurance, 1.9% [IQR, 0.2%-8.8%] vs 3.3% [IQR, 0.7%-10.8%], P < .01; race, 7.6% [IQR, 3.2%-16.6%] vs 9.3% [IQR, 4.0%-19.0%], P = .01), and differed from nonequitable hospitals in multiple domains (teaching status, geography, size; P < .01). In examining equity by insurance, hospitals with low costs were more likely to have equitable readmissions (odds ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.38-1.77), and there was no relationship between quality and value, and equity. In examining equity by race, hospitals with high overall quality were more likely to have equitable readmissions (odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.26]), and there was no relationship between cost and value, and equity. Conclusion and Relevance: A minority of hospitals achieved equitable readmissions. Notably, hospitals with equitable readmissions were characteristically different from those without. For example, hospitals with equitable readmissions served fewer Black patients, reinforcing the role of structural racism in hospital-level inequities. Implementation of an equitable readmission measure must consider unequal distribution of at-risk patients among hospitals.


Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais , Medicare , Readmissão do Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Humanos , População Negra , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais/normas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/normas , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Equidade em Saúde/economia , Equidade em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 80-85, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262256

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Access to innovative and effective medication is a citizen's right. The main objectives of this study were to build an indicator to measure access to medicines within hospitals, the Global Medicines Access Index, and to identify the main existing barriers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study carried out in Portuguese National Health Service hospitals. A consensus methodology (expert panel of 7 members) was used to define which dimensions should be included in the index and the weighting that each should take. The panel identified 6 dimensions: access to innovative medicines, proximity distribution, shortages, access to medicines before financing decision, value-based healthcare, and access to medication depending on cost/funding. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire (September 2021). RESULTS: The response rate was 61.2%. Most hospitals used medicines with and without marketing authorization before the funding decision. Monitoring and generating evidence of new therapies results is still insufficient. The identified barriers were the administrative burden as the major barrier in purchasing medicines, with a relevant impact on shortages of medicines. Most respondents (87%) had a proximity distribution program, mainly implemented in the pandemic context, and the price/funding model was only identified by 10% as a barrier to access. The 2021 Global Medicines Access Index was 66%. Shortages and value-based use of medicines were the dimensions that had more influence in lowering the index value. CONCLUSIONS: The new formula used to obtain a unique and multidimensional index for access to hospital medicines seems to be more sensitive and objective and will be used to monitor access.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Portugal , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 123(5): 613-619, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38195318

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: /Purpose: To achieve the World Health Organization goal of eliminating viral hepatitis by 2030, a key strategy in resource-limited areas is to identify the areas with high prevalence and to prioritize screening and treatment intervention. We hypothesized that a hospital-based laboratory database could be used to estimate the township- and village-specific anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence. METHODS: Yunlin County Public Health Bureau has been collecting anti-HCV test data from eight major hospitals. Township- and village-specific screening testing rates and anti-HCV prevalence were calculated for residents 40 years or older. A township with a wide range of anti-HCV prevalence rates was selected for outreach universal screening and for validating the village-specific prevalence of anti-HCV in the analysis of the data from the hospitals. RESULTS: The overall anti-HCV screening testing rate in Yunlin County was 30.4 %, whereas the anti-HCV prevalence rate for persons 40 years or older was 15.4 %. The village-specific anti-HCV prevalence rates ranged from 3.8 % to 85.8 %. Community-based screening was conducted in Kouhu Township. The village-specific anti-HCV prevalence rates ranged from 0 % to 18.8 %. Three of the four villages had the highest village-specific anti-HCV prevalence in the community-based study and the hospital-based study. Additionally, 95.8 % of the new HCV cases detected by universal screening received anti-HCV therapy. CONCLUSION: The hospital-based database provided a framework for identifying the villages with high anti-HCV prevalence. Additionally, community-based universal screening should be prioritized for villages with high prevalence in hospital-based databases.


Assuntos
Hepatite C , Programas de Rastreamento , Humanos , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepacivirus/imunologia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Urologie ; 63(5): 474-481, 2024 May.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265488

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In addition to the objectifiable treatment quality, patients' perspectives are gaining relevance. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize available hospital rating websites (HRW) with regards to patient ratings and to compare them with data from hospital quality reports and quality assurance based on routine data (QSR) for urological departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a structured online search for HRWs, websites were compared based on patient ratings from the 10 urologic departments with the largest intervention rates in 2021 using generalized estimated equations. For radical prostatectomy (RPE), quantitative comparison of patient ratings (klinikbewertungen.de) and QSR-based ratings was performed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: Of 1845 hits, 25 portals were analyzed. The department-wise comparison of HRWs resulted in significantly different patient ratings (p < 0.001). Patient ratings (klinikbewertungen.de) and QSR data (AOK-Gesundheitsnavigator) showed no significant correlation. An internal comparison of QSR data and patient ratings from the AOK-Gesundheitsnavigator on RPE showed a significant negative correlation between the overall rating and unplanned reoperations (r = -0.81) or other complications (r = -0.91). There was no significant correlation with the recommendation rate by patients. CONCLUSION: Hospital rating websites show considerable heterogeneity regarding patient ratings of the same urology department in different portals. Furthermore, based on the selected examples, there seems to be no correlation between subjective and objective evaluations between different websites or within one website.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Internet , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Hospitais/normas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente , Alemanha , Urologia/normas , Masculino , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA