Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2129920, 2021 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698848

RESUMO

Importance: Increasing hospital costs for bronchiolitis have been associated with increasing patient complexity and mechanical ventilation. However, the associations of illness severity and diagnostic coding practices with bronchiolitis hospitalization costs have not been examined. Objective: To investigate the association of patient complexity, illness severity, and diagnostic coding practices with bronchiolitis hospitalization costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 385 883 infants aged 24 months or younger who were hospitalized with bronchiolitis at 39 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Exposure: Hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Inflation-adjusted standardized unit cost (expressed in dollar units) per hospitalization over time. A nested subgroup analysis was performed to further examine factors associated with changes in cost. Results: A total of 385 883 bronchiolitis hospitalizations were studied; the patients had a mean (SD) age of 7.5 (6.4) months and included 227 309 of 385 883 boys (58.9%) and 253 870 of 385 883 publicly insured patients (65.8%). Among patients hospitalized with bronchiolitis, the median standardized unit cost per hospitalization increased significantly during the study period (from $5636 [95% CI, $5558-$5714] in 2010 to $6973 [95% CI, $6915-$7030] in 2019; P < .001 for trend). Similar increases in cost were observed among subgroups of patients without a complex chronic condition and without the need for mechanical ventilation. However, costs for patients without a complex chronic condition or mechanical ventilation, who received care outside the intensive care unit did not change in an economically significant manner (from $4803 [95% CI, $4752-$4853] in 2010 to $4853 [95% CI, $4811-$4895] in 2019; P < .001 for trend), suggesting that intensive care unit use was a primary factor associated with cost increases. Substantial changes in coding practices were observed. Among patients hospitalized with bronchiolitis, 1.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.3%) were assigned an APR-DRG (All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group) for respiratory failure in 2010, which increased to 21.6% (95% CI, 21.2%-21.9%) in 2019 (P < .001 for trend). Increased costs and coding intensity were not accompanied by objective evidence of worsening illness severity. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study suggests that hospitalized children with bronchiolitis are receiving costlier and more intensive care without objective evidence of increasing severity of illness. Changes in coding practices may complicate efforts to study trends in the use of health care resources using administrative data.


Assuntos
Bronquiolite/terapia , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/classificação , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/normas , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 39(5): e355-e359, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531250

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains controversial, particularly in children between the ages of 6 and 10. In the current push toward cost containment, hospital type, and surgeon subspecialization have emerged as important factors influencing this treatment decision. Thus, in the present study, we use a nationwide pediatric inpatient database to compare the: (a) incidence; (b) demographic characteristics; (c) hospital costs; (d) length of stay; and (e) treatment method of pediatric closed femoral shaft fractures admitted to general versus children's hospitals. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for all patients aged 6 to 10 who sustained a closed femoral shaft fracture in 2009 or 2012, and patient records were stratified into children's hospitals and general hospitals. Primary outcome measures included method of treatment, total hospital costs, and length of stay. Student/Welch t testing and χ analysis were utilized to compare continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, between hospital types. RESULTS: The total incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures decreased between 2009 and 2012 (1919 to 1581 patients; P=0.020), as did the proportion of patients treated in children's hospitals (58.6% to 32.3%; P<0.001). In addition, patients treated at general hospitals were more likely to receive open reduction with internal fixation (45.3% vs. 41.1%) or external fixation (4.1% vs. 2.3%), and less likely to be managed with closed reduction with internal fixation (32.0% vs. 39.7%) than those treated at children's hospitals (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a decrease in the incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures in 6- to 10-year old patients from 2009 to 2012, as well as decreased definitive management in children's hospitals and increased selection of operative treatment. In addition, treatment in a nonchildren's hospital was associated with decreased total inpatient costs and decreased treatment with closed reduction with internal fixation in favor of open reduction with internal fixation. Future studies should seek to identify the specific surgical procedures performed and match patients more closely based specific fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level II.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Fêmur , Fixação de Fratura , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Diáfises , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação de Fratura/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Transl Behav Med ; 9(4): 768-776, 2019 07 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30053295

RESUMO

Most childhood injuries can be prevented with the correct use of safety devices and appropriate supervision. Children's hospitals are well positioned to promote these behaviors with evidence-based programming; however, barriers exist to adopting such programs. The purpose of this study was to describe organizational and administrative factors related to the adoption of an efficacious injury prevention (IP) program by children's hospitals in the USA. IP specialists at 232 U.S. children's hospitals were invited to complete a baseline survey, and then offered Safe N' Sound (SNS), an efficacious computer IP program targeting parents of young children. Following this promotion period, specialists were surveyed again to assess their level of SNS adoption. Organizational and administrative factors associated with SNS adoption were identified using conditional random forest models (n = 93). Random forests identified a set of six predictors with potential utility for classifying hospitals as having SNS adoption activity or not; the final pruned classification tree indicated that four of these were best able to differentiate hospitals with and without adoption activity-having a medical director, having other hospital units that provided IP programming, the number of requests the IP unit received within the past year, and the belief of administrative leaders in their responsibility to develop programming all influence decisions. Hospitals without a medical director were most likely to demonstrate adoption activity. Medical directors, or other organizational leaders, can facilitate the adoption process for evidence-based intervention, but may need to be engaged intentionally when disseminating new products, tools, or approaches.


Assuntos
Prevenção de Acidentes/instrumentação , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Prevenção de Acidentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Pré-Escolar , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/legislação & jurisprudência , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Liderança , Política Organizacional , Pais/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Hosp Pediatr ; 7(6): 320-327, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28522604

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Constipation is a common pediatric condition with a prevalence of 3% to 5% in children aged 4 to 17 years. Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the management of pediatric patients hospitalized with constipation. The primary objective was to evaluate practice patterns and patient outcomes for the hospital management of functional constipation in US children's hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of children aged 0 to 18 years hospitalized for functional constipation from 2012 to 2014 by using the Pediatric Health Information System. Patients were included by using constipation and other related diagnoses as classified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Patients with complex chronic conditions were excluded. Outcome measures included percentage of hospitalizations due to functional constipation, therapies used, length of stay, and 90-day readmission rates. Statistical analysis included means with 95% confidence intervals for individual hospital outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 14 243 hospitalizations were included, representing 12 804 unique patients. The overall percentage of hospitalizations due to functional constipation was 0.65% (range: 0.19%-1.41%, P < .0001). The percentage of patients receiving the following treatment during their hospitalization included: electrolyte laxatives: 40% to 96%; sodium phosphate enema: 0% to 64%; mineral oil enema: 0% to 61%; glycerin suppository: 0% to 37%; bisacodyl 0% to 47%; senna: 0% to 23%; and docusate 0% to 11%. Mean length of stay was 1.97 days (range: 1.31-2.73 days, P < .0001). Mean 90-day readmission rate was 3.78% (range: 0.95%-7.53%, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in practice patterns and clinical outcomes for pediatric patients hospitalized with functional constipation across US children's hospitals. Collaborative initiatives to adopt evidence-based best practices guidelines could help standardize the hospital management of pediatric functional constipation.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/terapia , Gastroenteropatias , Hospitais Pediátricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/fisiopatologia , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Hospitais Pediátricos/normas , Humanos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos
8.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 35(6): 899-905, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24894896

RESUMO

A significant inverse relationship of surgical institutional and surgeon volumes to outcome has been demonstrated in many high-stakes surgical specialties. By and large, the same results were found in pediatric cardiac surgery, for which a more thorough analysis has shown that this relationship depends on case complexity and type of surgical procedures. Lower-volume programs tend to underperform larger-volume programs as case complexity increases. High-volume pediatric cardiac surgeons also tend to have better results than low-volume surgeons, especially at the more complex end of the surgery spectrum (e.g., the Norwood procedure). Nevertheless, this trend for lower mortality rates at larger centers is not universal. All larger programs do not perform better than all smaller programs. Moreover, surgical volume seems to account for only a small proportion of the overall between-center variation in outcome. Intraoperative technical performance is one of the most important parts, if not the most important part, of the therapeutic process and a critical component of postoperative outcome. Thus, the use of center-specific, risk-adjusted outcome as a tool for quality assessment together with monitoring of technical performance using a specific score may be more reliable than relying on volume alone. However, the relationship between surgical volume and outcome in pediatric cardiac surgery is strong enough that it ought to support adapted and well-balanced health care strategies that take advantage of the positive influence that higher center and surgeon volumes have on outcome.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/cirurgia , Criança , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Risco Ajustado , Fatores de Risco , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 192: 210-4, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23920546

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Hospital relocation is a highly complex undertaking, which has the potential to interrupt operations and poses risks for patients, staff, and providers. Little is known how hospital relocation impacts on workflow and communication. METHODS: Using existing Electronic Health Record (EHR) data we determined time from medication ordering to first dose administration as a proxy for well-being of the medication process during a five months window surrounding the relocation of a 205-bed children's hospital. RESULTS: Overall performance of the medication process has declined slightly. We identified regional (unit) differences with the pediatric intensive care unit, which had the most significant changes to its workflow, experiencing a more than doubling of the time from ordering to medication administration. Overall, there was no significant difference in time-sensitive medication administration times. Evaluating the medication ordering-dispensing-administration process through readily available EHR data demonstrated that the impact of a hospital' s relocation on workflow and communication can be successfully monitored.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fluxo de Trabalho , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Maryland , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/classificação , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Transferência de Pacientes/classificação , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Pediatrics ; 128(6): 1168-72, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22123878

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although the role of reputation in determining the relative standings in the U.S. News & World Report (USNWR) annual rankings of the top 50 hospitals has received analytical attention, the role of reputation in the best children's hospitals pediatric specialty rankings has not been quantified. Our goal was to quantify the role of reputation in determining the relative standings of the top-ranked pediatric specialties and their associated hospitals in the 2008-2010 editions of the USNWR best children's hospital rankings. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of USNWR data collected from the top 30 hospitals in each of 6 (and later 10) specialties was performed. The main outcome measures were rankings based on total USNWR scores and subjective reputation scores. RESULTS: On average, rankings based on reputation scores alone correlated with USNWR overall rankings; correlation coefficients ranged from 0.80 to 0.98 (Spearman Correlation; mean P < .001). This relationship was consistent over all 3 survey years. CONCLUSIONS: The relative standings of the top 30 pediatric hospitals in each of 10 specialties are largely explained by the compelling correlation between subjective reputation scores and ranking scores.


Assuntos
Benchmarking , Hospitais Pediátricos/normas , Pediatria/normas , Hospitais Pediátricos/classificação , Pediatria/classificação , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA