Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 130
Filtrar
3.
Fed Regist ; 81(162): 56761-7345, 2016 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27544939

RESUMO

We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems for FY 2017. Some of these changes will implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Reform Act of 2013, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implications for Care Eligibility Act of 2015, and other legislation. We also are providing the estimated market basket update to apply to the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits for FY 2017. We are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) for FY 2017. In addition, we are making changes relating to direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education payments; establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for quality reporting by specific Medicare providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities), including related provisions for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) participating in the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program; implementing statutory provisions that require hospitals and CAHs to furnish notification to Medicare beneficiaries, including Medicare Advantage enrollees, when the beneficiaries receive outpatient observation services for more than 24 hours; announcing the implementation of the Frontier Community Health Integration Project Demonstration; and making technical corrections and changes to regulations relating to costs to related organizations and Medicare cost reports; we are providing notice of the closure of three teaching hospitals and the opportunity to apply for available GME resident slots under section 5506 of the Affordable Care Act. We are finalizing the provisions of interim final rules with comment period that relate to a temporary exception for certain wound care discharges from the application of the site neutral payment rate under the LTCH PPS for certain LTCHs; application of two judicial decisions relating to modifications of limitations on redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board; and legislative extensions of the Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital program and changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals.


Assuntos
Medicare/economia , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/economia , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/economia , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Urbanos/economia , Hospitais Urbanos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/economia , Assistência de Longa Duração/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia
4.
Fed Regist ; 81(77): 23428-38, 2016 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27101642

RESUMO

This interim final rule with comment period (IFC) implements section 231 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 (CAA), which provides for a temporary exception for certain wound care discharges from the application of the site neutral payment rate under the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Prospective Payment System (PPS) for certain long-term care hospitals. This IFC also amends our current regulations to allow hospitals nationwide to reclassify based on their acquired rural status, effective with reclassifications beginning with fiscal year (FY) 2018. Hospitals with an existing Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB) reclassification would also have the opportunity to seek rural reclassification for IPPS payment and other purposes and keep their existing MGCRB reclassification. We would also apply the policy in this IFC when deciding timely appeals before the Administrator under our regulations for FY 2017 that were denied by the MGCRB due to existing regulations, which do not permit simultaneous rural reclassification for IPPS payment and other purposes and MGCRB reclassification. These regulatory changes implement the decisions in Geisinger Community Medical Center v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 794 F.3d 383 (3d Cir. 2015) and Lawrence + Memorial Hospital v. Burwell, No. 15-164, 2016 WL 423702 (2d Cir. Feb. 4, 2015) in a nationally consistent manner.


Assuntos
Hospitais Rurais/economia , Assistência de Longa Duração/economia , Medicare/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Assistência de Longa Duração/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
5.
Fed Regist ; 80(219): 70297-607, 2015 Nov 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26567438

RESUMO

This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2016 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program and the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. Further, this document includes certain finalized policies relating to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system: Changes to the 2-midnight rule under the short inpatient hospital stay policy; and a payment transition for hospitals that lost their status as a Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital (MDH) because they are no longer in a rural area due to the implementation of the new Office of Management and Budget delineations in FY 2015 and have not reclassified from urban to rural before January 1, 2016. In addition, this document contains a final rule that finalizes certain 2015 proposals, and addresses public comments received, relating to the changes in the Medicare regulations governing provider administrative appeals and judicial review relating to appropriate claims in provider cost reports.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/economia , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/economia , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/legislação & jurisprudência , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
6.
Fed Regist ; 80(158): 49325-886, 2015 Aug 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26292371

RESUMO

We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems for FY 2016. Some of these changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act), the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Reform(SGR) Act of 2013, the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, and other legislation. We also are addressing the update of the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits for FY 2016.As an interim final rule with comment period, we are implementing the statutory extensions of the Medicare dependent,small rural hospital (MDH)Program and changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals under the IPPS.We also are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) for FY 2016 and implementing certain statutory changes to the LTCH PPS under the Affordable Care Act and the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Reform Act of 2013 and the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014.In addition, we are establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for quality reporting by specific providers (acute care hospitals,PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, and LTCHs) that are participating in Medicare, including related provisions for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals participating in the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR)Incentive Program. We also are updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/economia , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Assistência de Longa Duração/economia , Assistência de Longa Duração/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Estados Unidos
10.
Fed Regist ; 79(116): 3444-52, 2014 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25011160

RESUMO

This document announces changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals and to the Medicare-dependent hospital (MDH) program under the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for the second half of FY 2014 (April 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014) in accordance with sections 105 and 106, respectively, of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA).


Assuntos
Hospitais Comunitários/economia , Hospitais Rurais/economia , Medicare/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde , Hospitais Comunitários/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
13.
Fed Regist ; 75(226): 71799-2580, 2010 Nov 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21121180

RESUMO

The final rule with comment period in this document revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system and to implement certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act). In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2011. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates the revised Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system and to implement certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In this final rule with comment period, we set forth the applicable relative payment weights and amounts for services furnished in ASCs, specific HCPCS codes to which these changes apply, and other pertinent ratesetting information for the CY 2011 ASC payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2011. In this document, we also are including two final rules that implement provisions of the Affordable Care Act relating to payments to hospitals for direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) costs; and new limitations on certain physician referrals to hospitals in which they have an ownership or investment interest. In the interim final rule with comment period that is included in this document, we are changing the effective date for otherwise eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals that have been reclassified from urban to rural under section 1886(d)(8)(E) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 412.103 to receive reasonable cost payments for anesthesia services and related care furnished by nonphysician anesthetists from cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2010, to December 2, 2010.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Medicare/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/economia , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Enfermeiros Anestesistas/economia , Enfermeiros Anestesistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Autorreferência Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Centros Cirúrgicos/economia , Centros Cirúrgicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
14.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 67(13): 1085-92, 2010 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20554595

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Telepharmacy practices in rural hospitals in several states were examined, and relevant policies and state laws and regulations were analyzed, along with issues to be addressed as the use of telepharmacy expands. METHODS: Telepharmacy initiatives in rural hospitals were identified through a survey of the 50 state offices of rural health. Telephone interviews were conducted with board of pharmacy directors in selected states with successful telepharmacy programs. Interviews were also conducted with the individual hospitals regarding the type of telepharmacy activities, funding, and impact on medication safety. The information was analyzed to identify themes and to assess whether state laws and regulations followed recommendations by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. RESULTS: Although telepharmacy is addressed in NABP's model pharmacy practice act, many state boards are just beginning to address it. The model act addresses the practice of pharmacy across state lines, and the state board directors interviewed generally agreed that pharmacists should be licensed in the state where they are providing the service. States differed on whether a pharmacist should be required to be physically located in a licensed pharmacy and how much time the pharmacist should have to spend onsite. Telepharmacy models being implemented in hospitals in several states incorporate long-distance supervision of pharmacy technicians by pharmacists. The models being implemented vary according to area, state regulations, hospital ownership, and hospital size and medication order volume. Most hospitals reported that they track medication error rates, and some said error rates have improved since telepharmacy implementation. CONCLUSION: The application of telepharmacy in rural hospitals varies across the United States but is not widespread, and many states have not defined regulations for telepharmacy in hospitals.


Assuntos
Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/organização & administração , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hospitais Rurais/normas , Humanos , Licenciamento , Farmacêuticos/normas , Técnicos em Farmácia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/normas , Telemedicina/normas , Estados Unidos
20.
Hosp Health Netw ; 82(1): 42-4, 2, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18286896

RESUMO

Skeptics say the federal critical access hospital program is too expensive and that too much of the funding is spent on construction projects. But leaders of CAHs and other proponents say upgrading aging facilities is just one step in bringing new technology and improved services to their rural communities.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Arquitetura Hospitalar , Hospitais Rurais , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/economia , Hospitais Rurais/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Rurais/normas , Humanos , Kansas , Medicare Part A/legislação & jurisprudência , Montana , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA