Análisis de parámetros de calidad y de costos, de uso del catéter venoso central de inserción periférica frente al catéter de inserción central, en población pediátrica del Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia. 2011-2014 / Analysis of quality parameters and costs of using the central venous catheter of peripheral insertion versus the central insertion catheter in pediatric patients at Hospital Univeristario Del Valle, Cali Colombia 2011-2014

Objetivo: estimar parámetros de calidad y de costos en el procedimiento de inserción de Catéter Venoso Central y el Catéter Venoso Central de inserción periférica. Metodología: Se evaluaron las historias de niños (edad 31 días -15 años ), que ingresaron al Hospital Universitario del Valle, entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2014, que requirieron canalización de una vena central. Se evaluaron variables demográficas, de calidad y se estimaron costos de ambos procedimientos. Resultados: Se evaluaron 100 procedimientos de inserción Central y 100 de inserción periférica, los últimos tuvieron menor tiempo de espera, se realizaron en la habitación, no requirieron ayuno, ni traslado al quirófano, a un menor costo, lo cual impactó la oportunidad de administración de tratamiento farmacológico, la evolución y la estancia hospitalaria. Conclusiones: Se recomienda que el procedimiento de inserción periférica sea la primera elección en niños que requieran tratamientos endovenosos mayores a cinco días, para esto es necesario conformar un grupo que supervise el funcionamiento de los catéteres y brinde educación continua al personal de salud de los servicios de hospitalización y a familiares, contar con una sala de procedimiento para la inserción del PICC que brinde seguridad y adecuado manejo del dolor.

Aim: to estimate quality and cost parameters of central venous catheter insertion peripheral and central venous catheter procedures. Methods: we reviewed records of 200 children (31 days - years old), hospitalised at a University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2014 who required central vein access. We assessed demographic, quality variables and cost of both procedures. Results: we reviewed records of 100 central insertion and 100 peripheral insertion procedures. Peripheral insertions had less waiting time, were conducted next to the child's bed, without need for fasting or transfering to the operating room, at a lower cost, all of these ensured timely administration of medicaments and nutrition, which resulted in lower stance time. The peripheral insertion also freed surgeon and operating room time to perform other interventions. Conclusions: We recommend that peripheral insertion procedure should be the first choice in children requiring intravenous treatments longer than five days. In order to establish a periferal insertion procedure in a hospital, a team is required to follow-up the patients and provide continuing education to health personnel in services and to family members, there is also a need for an appropiate space for insertion procedures and pain management.

Alternatives to inpatient treatment in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: Effectiveness and characteristics of a new intensive model of day patient treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Inpatient Treatment (IT) is the treatment of choice for moderate or severely ill adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Nevertheless, it is expensive, and the risk for relapse or readmissions is high. A less costly alternative to IT is Day Patient Treatment (DP), which may also help to avoid relapses and readmissions because facilitates transition from hospital to community treatment. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of the 11-hour DP program for Eating Disorders (DP-ED-11h), a new intensive DP treatment for adolescents with AN, with respect to weight recovery, avoidance of hospital admission and decrease of Length of Stay (LoS). METHOD: A longitudinal, naturalistic study was carried out analysing clinical and sociodemographic variables from 77 patients with AN who were consecutively discharged from DP-ED-11h, during years 2015-2016. RESULTS: There were 77 discharges. The average age was 14.4 years old (SD: 1.62). The LoS at DP-ED-11h was 28.9 days (SD: 18.5). The mean body mass index increased significantly at discharge (17.2 vs. 17.9, p<0.001) and at 12 months follow- up (17.9 vs. 19.3, p<0.001). Twenty nine (70.8%) of the patients treated at DP-ED-11h, who came from a less intensive setting, avoided an admission. Fourteen (18.2%) required readmission at DP-ED-11h within two years. The LoS at IT was significantly reduced (from 33 to 24 days, p<0.043). CONCLUSION: DP-ED-11h has shown to be an effective resource as an alternative to IT for adolescents with moderate to severe AN. This new model has cost-effectiveness implications as it is a safe resource and is less costly than IT.

Assessment of a Day Hospital Management Program for Children With Type 1 Diabetes.

Importance: A shift in the setting of care delivery for children with a new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes led to a reorganization of treatment. Objective: To determine whether a new diagnosis of pediatric diabetes can be successfully managed in a day hospital model. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study used retrospectively collected data on pediatric patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes who completed an inpatient program for education and insulin titration prospectively compared with patients completing a diabetes day hospital program. Baseline data were collected over 12 months (January-December 2015) and intervention data collected over 14 months (March 2016-May 2017). The study was conducted at a single institution and judged as a nonhuman participant project. The referral local base included a 100-mile radius. Patient inclusion was a new diagnosis of diabetes, age 5 years or older, and no biochemical evidence of diabetic ketoacidosis. Ninety-six patients completed the day hospital program and 192 patients completed an inpatient program. Exposures: All patients received 2 consecutive days of insulin titration and education in either a day hospital or inpatient setting. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included the mean length of stay, patient charge, and insurance denial/reimbursement rates. The hypothesis was that a day hospital program would be associated with a reduced length of stay, which would directly affect patient charges and insurance denials. Results: Among the 96 day hospital patients, the mean (SD) age was 12.2 (4.7) years (range 5-20.3), with no patients experiencing diabetic ketoacidosis or hypernatremia. Among the 192 inpatient patients, the mean (SD) age was 9.4 (4.7) years (range, 1.6-20.1). The mean (SD) length of stay reduction in the day hospital was 46 (14.1) to 14 (5.1) hours. The mean day hospital patient charge was $2800, compared with a mean (SD) baseline carge of $24 103 ($9401). Within the first year, there was a cumulative reduction in patient charges of more than $2.1 million. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that a diabetes day hospital setting was associated with reductions in length of stay and patient charges, with an increase in insurance reimbursements and a decrease in insurance denials. This study demonstrates an effective way to streamline new-onset diabetes education, which may reduce length of stay and patient charges. Reimbursement rates for patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes increased from 52% to 72% and reimbursement denial rates decreased from 80% to 0%.

Cost-effectiveness of a non-pharmacological treatment vs. "care as usual" in day care centers for community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment: results from the German randomized controlled DeTaMAKS-trial.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in older adults causes a high economic and societal burden. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the multicomponent, non-pharmacological MAKS treatment vs. "care as usual" in German day care centers (DCCs) for community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild to moderate dementia over 6 months. METHODS: The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective alongside the cluster-randomized controlled, multicenter, prospective DeTaMAKS-trial with waitlist group design. Outcomes were Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living in Persons with Mild Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (ETAM) of 433 individuals in 32 DCCs. Incremental differences in MMSE and ETAM were calculated via a Gaussian-distributed and incremental cost difference via a Gamma-distributed Generalized Linear Model. Cost-effectiveness was assessed via cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC). RESULTS: At 6 months, MMSE (adjusted mean difference = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17 to 1.67; p = 0.02) and ETAM (adjusted mean difference = 1.00; CI: 0.14 to 1.85; p = 0.02) were significantly better in the intervention group. The adjusted cost difference was - €938.50 (CI: - 2733.65 to 763.13; p = 0.31). Given the CEAC, MAKS was cost-effective for 78.0% of MMSE and 77.4% for ETAM without a need for additional costs to payers. CONCLUSIONS: MAKS is a cost-effective treatment to stabilize the ability to perform activities of daily living and cognitive abilities of people with MCI or mild to moderate dementia in German DCCs. Thus, MAKS should be implemented in DCCs.

[Supportive day care at a cancer center: A comparative study of 2008 versus 2016 activity]. / Hôpital de jour de soins de support dans un Centre de Lutte contre le cancer : étude comparative de l'activité entre 2008 et 2016.

The Paul Strauss Center day-care accompaniment department ("SSAJ") is an oncologic supportive day-care, also an alternative to conventional hospitalization. In order to follow the SSAJ department's activity, in the "ambulatory turnover" context, we compared the 2008 and 2016 four first months activity. In 2016, there was an average of 4.96 patients per day versus 5.62 in 2008 (P<0.001); average day incoming of 653€ per stay in 2016 versus 775€ in 2008 (P<0.001). In 2016, there was an average 63.9 % of imagery done versus 27.7 % in 2008 (P<0.001). The 2016 average patient following period was of 84.7 days versus 67.6 days in 2008 (P=0.019). Average time between first day-care visit and death was 161.7 days in 2016 versus 133.5 days in 2008 (P=0.0033). Average day activity is lower in 2016 than 2008, nonetheless number of total stays and inpatients has increased on the four months period. The SSAJ intervenes more precociously in 2016 than 2008. Hospital technical platform is better used, but average per-stay incoming has statistically lowered. The SSAJ limits and prepares complete hospitalizations. Inpatient close reevaluation after a "shorter-willing" stay, home issues anticipation and identification with the home-care team, and worsening prevention gives this activity all its meaning.

Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Day care services aim to offer meaningful activities and a safe environment for the attendees and a respite for family caregivers while being cost effective. This study compares the use of formal and informal care in users and non-users of day care centres designed for persons with dementia. METHOD: Users of day care designed for dementia (DC group) and non-users (NDC group) were followed over a period of 24 months or until nursing home admission (NHA) respectively death. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months. The use of care was recorded by Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD). RESULTS: A total of 257 persons with dementia participated in the study, 181 in the DC group and 76 in the NDC group. Users of day care centres cause higher costs due to the expenses for day care, while neither the use of home nursing, secondary care, informal care nor the time until NHA did show any differences between users and non-users. The overall costs were higher in the DC group at baseline and after 12 months, but this difference was no longer present at the end of the two-year study period. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate no potential cost-saving effect of day care designed for people with dementia, as the use of day care did neither result in a reduced use of care nor in a delay of NHA. Future research should balance the non-monetary benefits of day care against its costs for a full cost-effectiveness analysis, most favourable in a RCT-design.

Adult Day Services Outcomes: Delphi Review of an Integrated Participant Assessment System.

Adult day services (ADS) aim to help elders age in place, but evidence of impact on participants lags behind caregiver research. To play a larger role in the continuum of care, ADS participant outcomes should regularly be documented with standard measures. We conducted a Delphi review of one integrated participant assessment system. Capturing physical, mental, and cognitive health indicators and activity engagement of typical ADS participants (i.e., frail elders eligible for nursing home placement), experts evaluated the system on instrument validity, relevance, and application. Practitioners and researchers completed multiple assessments of the system's instruments and alternatives. Finally, panelists addressed the potential benefits and challenges of system adoption by ADS providers. Panelists concurred that such a system would benefit individuals, families, and providers; concerns related to cost and staffing requirements and appropriateness for distinct client populations. A refined system can reveal best practices to enhance ADS service delivery and participant outcomes.

Start-up of a Cardiology Day Hospital: Activity, Quality Care and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the First Year of Operation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The cardiology day hospital (CDH) is an alternative to hospitalization for scheduled cardiological procedures. The aims of this study were to analyze the activity, quality of care and the cost-effectiveness of a CDH. METHODS: An observational descriptive study was conducted of the health care activity during the first year of operation of DHHA. The quality of care was analyzed through the substitution rate (outpatient procedures), cancellation rates, complications, and a satisfaction survey. For cost-effectiveness, we calculated the economic savings of avoided hospital stays. RESULTS: A total of 1646 patients were attended (mean age 69 ± 15 years, 60% men); 2550 procedures were scheduled with a cancellation rate of 4%. The most frequently cancelled procedure was electrical cardioversion. The substitution rate for scheduled invasive procedures was 66%. Only 1 patient required readmission after discharge from the CDH due to heart failure. Most surveyed patients (95%) considered the care received in the CDH to be good or very good. The saving due to outpatient-converted procedures made possible by the CDH was € 219 199.55, higher than the cost of the first year of operation. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, the CDH allowed more than two thirds of the invasive procedures to be performed on an outpatient basis, while maintaining the quality of care. In the first year of operation, the expenses due to its implementation were offset by a significant reduction in hospital admissions.

[Medico-economic benefits of subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab and rituximab in day hospitalisation (SCuBA Study)]. / Bénéfices médicoéconomiques des formes sous-cutanées de trastuzumab et de rituximab en hospitalisation de jour (étude SCuBA).

INTRODUCTION: New pharmaceutical forms of trastuzumab and rituximab which can be administered by the subcutaneous route have been developed recently. For day hospitalisation units, these can be used in simpler treatment protocols than previous intravenous formulations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the medical and economic consequences of switching to subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab and rituximab. METHODS: Thirty-six day care units in 30 hospitals or clinics participated in this observational study. Data were collected on the capacity of the units, the number of chemotherapy sessions implemented, the duration of occupation of a chair and the production capacity of the unit pharmacy. The number of additional sessions made possible by the use of subcutaneous forms in 2016 was determined and the associated gain in earnings calculated using national tariffs. RESULTS: Compared to the intravenous route, the mean duration of occupation of a chair was reduced by 56.1 % for a session of subcutaneous trastuzumab and by 73.8 % for a session of subcutaneous rituximab. The mean number of additional sessions made possible by the use of subcutaneous treatments was 242 [168-316] sessions by year by unit, corresponding to 2.7 % [1.9 %-3.4 %] of the total number of chemotherapy sessions in the unit. The corresponding gain in annual earnings was € 111 388. DISCUSSION: Switching the route of administration from the intravenous to the subcutaneous route is a useful strategy to address the increase in activity of day hospitalisation units. This allows an increase of 2.7 % in the total number of chemotherapy sessions in the unit. In most of the participating units, there was room for further optimization of activity, potentially to reach 4.2 % of the total number of sessions.

What is a hospital bed day worth? A contingent valuation study of hospital Chief Executive Officers.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing hospital length of stay, and so freeing up hospital beds, represents an important cost saving which is often used in economic evaluations. The savings need to be accurately quantified in order to make optimal health care resource allocation decisions. Traditionally the accounting cost of a bed is used. We argue instead that the economic cost of a bed day is the better value for making resource decisions, and we describe our valuation method and estimations for costing this important resource. METHODS: We performed a contingent valuation using 37 Australian Chief Executive Officers' (CEOs) willingness to pay (WTP) to release bed days in their hospitals, both generally and using specific cases. We provide a succinct thematic analysis from qualitative interviews post survey completion, which provide insight into the decision making process. RESULTS: On average CEOs are willing to pay a marginal rate of $216 for a ward bed day and $436 for an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) bed day, with estimates of uncertainty being greater for ICU beds. These estimates are significantly lower (four times for ward beds and seven times for ICU beds) than the traditional accounting costs often used. Key themes to emerge from the interviews include the importance of national funding and targets, and their associated incentive structures, as well as the aversion to discuss bed days as an economic resource. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance for valuing bed days as an economic resource to inform cost effectiveness models and thus improve hospital decision making and resource allocation. Significantly under or over valuing the resource is very likely to result in sub-optimal decision making. We discuss the importance of recognising the opportunity costs of this resource and highlight areas for future research.

Characteristics of care management agencies affect expenditure on home help and day care services: A population-based cross-sectional study in Japan.

AIM: The financial interests of care management agencies can affect how care managers assist clients' use of long-term care insurance services. The present study examined the relationship between clients' service expenditures, and whether the home help and day care service agencies belonged to the same organization as the care management agency. METHODS: Population-based data were obtained from a suburban municipality in Japan. We investigated 4331 persons with care needs certificates (levels 1-5), including those using home help (n = 1780) or day care (n = 2141) services. Data on the service expenditures, and clients' and agencies' characteristics were analyzed using multiple linear regression analyses controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Home help service users spent an average of US$558.1 ± 590.1 for home help service, and day care service users spent US$665.0 ± 415.9 for day care service. Living alone, living in a condominium/apartment, higher care needs, more severe cognitive impairment and lower use of other services were associated with higher home help service expenditure. Day care service expenditure increased with older age, female sex, higher care needs, more severe cognitive impairment and higher physical function. Clients whose service agencies and care management agencies belonged to the same organization had higher expenditures, even after adjusting for confounders (home help: ß = 0.126, P = 0.007; day care: ß = 0.085, P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Financial interests of care management agencies might significantly influence clients' service expenditure. We should develop an effective system to minimize this influence. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 2224-2231.

[Regional Budgets in Psychiatry: An Alternative to Hospital per Diem Charges and the New Reimbursement System? - A Case Study from the District of Dithmarschen]. / Regionalbudgets in der Psychiatrie: Eine Alternative zu tagesgleichen Pflegesätzen und zum zukünftigen Finanzierungssystem?

Objective The study looked at the impact that the switch from a reimbursement system with hospital per diem charges to a regional budget had on treatment. Methods Routine data from two clinics over a period of ten years were evaluated. Results Treatment took place in day clinics and on an outpatient basis to an increased extent after the change. Conclusion The change in reimbursement system was the cause of the change in treatment. Since similar effects can also be expected when switching from the new reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine to a regional budget system, regional budgets are a reasonable alternative.

Improving the mix of institutional and community care for older people with dementia: an application of the balance of care approach in eight European countries.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the mix of community and institutional long-term care (ILTC) for people with dementia (PwD) in Europe could be improved; assess the economic consequences of providing alternative services for particular groups of ILTC entrants and explore the transnational application of the 'Balance of Care' (BoC) approach. METHOD: A BoC study was undertaken in Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the UK as part of the RightTimePlaceCare project. Drawing on information about 2014 PwD on the margins of ILTC admission, this strategic planning framework identified people whose needs could be met in more than one setting, and compared the relative costs of the possible alternatives. RESULTS: The findings suggest a noteworthy minority of ILTC entrants could be more appropriately supported in the community if enhanced services were available. This would not necessarily require innovative services, but more standard care (including personal and day care), assuming quality was ensured. Potential cost savings were identified in all countries, but community care was not always cheaper than ILTC and the ability to release resources varied between nations. CONCLUSIONS: This is believed to be the first transnational application of the BoC approach, and demonstrates its potential to provide a consistent approach to planning across different health and social care systems. Better comparative information is needed on the number of ILTC entrants with dementia, unit costs and outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings offer important evidence on the appropriateness of current provision, and the opportunity to learn from different countries' experience.

Day care versus inpatient management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: cost utility analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative cost effectiveness of day care over inpatient management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). STUDY DESIGN: A cost utility analysis was performed using a decision analytical model in which a Markov model was constructed. The Markov model was primarily populated with data from a recently published randomised controlled trial. Which included pregnant women presenting to Cork University Maternity Hospital, a tertiary referral maternity hospital, seeking treatment for NVP. Costs and outcomes were estimated from the perspective of the Irish health service (HSE) and patients. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis, using a Monte Carlo simulation, was also performed. A Bayesian Value of Information analysis was used to estimate the value of collecting additional information. RESULTS: When both the healthcare provider and patient's perspective was considered, day care management of NVP remained less costly (mean €985; 95% C.I. 705-1456 vs. €3837 (2124-8466)) and more effective (9.42; 4.19-12.25 vs. 9.49; 4.32-12.39 quality adjusted life years) compared with inpatient management. The Cost Effectiveness Acceptability Curve indicates the probability that day care management is 70% more cost effective compared to inpatient management at a ceiling ratio of €45,000 per QALY, indicating little decision uncertainty. The Bayesian Value of Information analysis indicates there is value in collecting further information; the Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) is estimated to be €5.4 million. CONCLUSION: Day care management of NVP is cost effective compared to inpatient management.

Development of the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Psychiatric Patients: TIC-P Mini and Midi.

BACKGROUND: Medical costs of (psychiatric) illness can be validly measured with patient report questionnaires. These questionnaires comprise many detailed items resulting in lengthy administrations. OBJECTIVES: We set out to find the minimal number of items needed to retrieve 80% and 90% of the costs as measured by the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (TIC-P). METHODS: The TIC-P is a validated patient-reported outcome measure concerning the utilization of medical care and productivity losses. The present study focused on direct medical costs. We applied data of 7756 TIC-P administrations from three studies in patients with mental health care issues. Items that contribute least to the total cost were eliminated, providing that 80% and 90% of the total cost was retained. RESULTS: Average medical costs per patient were €658 over the last 4 weeks. The distribution of cost was highly skewed, and 5 of the 14 items of the TIC-P accounted for less than 10% of the total costs. The 80% Mini version of the TIC-P required five items: ambulatory services, private practice, day care, general hospital, and psychiatric clinic. The TIC-P Midi 90% inventory required eight items. Both had variance between the three samples in the optimal choice of the items. CONCLUSIONS: The number of items of the TIC-P can be reduced considerably while maintaining 80% and 90% of the medical costs estimated by the complete TIC-P. The reduced length makes the questionnaire more suitable for routine outcome monitoring.

[Using money as a therapeutic tool in a therapeutic day centre]. / L'argent dans un CATTP, une thérapeutique institutionnelle ?

Can money be used as a tool in the resocialisation of patients? Other than the clinical and institutional issues which its use within a therapeutic day centre raises, it can nevertheless help the caregiver bring projects to fruition and the patients to become engaged in them.

Impact and costs of home-based trial of void compared with the day care setting.

AIMS: This paper presents the relative merits and comparative costs of conducting trial of void using Hospital-In-The-Home vs. the Day Procedure Unit. BACKGROUND: Hospitals increasingly discharge patients with acute urinary retention with indwelling urinary catheters. For these to be removed and patients supported to return to normal urinary function, outpatient or in-home services are used. To date, the relative effectiveness and costs of Hospital-In-The-Home care and Day Procedure Unit care for trial of void have not been examined. DESIGN: This retrospective study used a static-group comparison design. METHODS: Hospital administrative data from 1 February 2009-30 March 2011 for patients having trial of void in the Day Procedure Unit (n = 107) and Hospital-In-The-Home (n = 163) of a tertiary hospital in Western Australia were compared in terms of patient outcomes and costs. RESULTS: Day Procedure Unit patients had longer wait times than Hospital-In-The-Home patients; there was no difference between the two groups for average per patient days of service or successful first trials. Hospital-In-The-Home care did not increase the overall period of care. Per patient average ward-equivalent cost in the Day Procedure Unit was A$396 higher than the Hospital-In-The-Home ward-equivalent cost. The average cost saving per patient for Hospital-In-The-Home care including trial of void cost and emergency department visits was A$117. CONCLUSION: Patient outcomes from Hospital-In-The-Home trial of void in low-risk patients were comparable to those of Day Procedure Unit care and less costly. Hospital-In-The-Home care for this well-defined procedure could permit more efficient management of patient throughput.

Referral to Inpatient Treatment Does not Necessarily Imply a Need for Inpatient Treatment.

We analyzed the dispositional decisions taken in a unit for clinical decision making (UCDM) which was set up to examine all emergency inpatient referrals to a psychiatric hospital. Hospitalization proved unnecessary for at least 17 % of the N = 2,026 inpatient referrals over a one year period. Instead, these patients were admitted to day-hospitals or outpatient treatments, resulting in annual cost savings of approximately 3.3 million. Merely 8 % of those non-admitted patients had to be hospitalized within 28 days of the decision for non-admission being taken. Thus, a specialized UCDM run by clinical experts can help identify cost-effective alternatives to hospitalization.

Differences in adult day services center participant characteristics by center ownership: United States, 2012.

KEY FINDINGS: Data from the National Study of Long-Term Care Providers. In 2012, more than one-third of participants in adult day services centers were younger than 65. A higher percentage of participants in nonprofit centers than in for-profit centers were younger than 65. About one-half of participants in adult day services centers were non-Hispanic white persons. A higher percentage of participants in for-profit centers than in nonprofit centers were Hispanic or were non-Hispanic and of a race other than black or white. Almost one-third of adult day services center participants had Alzheimer's disease or other dementias, and about one-quarter had a developmental disability. A lower percentage of participants in for-profit than in nonprofit centers had Alzheimer's disease or other dementias or a developmental disability. The 4,800 adult day services centers nationwide provide a variety of services to their 273,200 participants, the majority of whom are older adults and women (1). The number of for-profit adult day services centers has grown in recent years (2). The 1,900 for-profit centers, representing 40% of centers nationally, served nearly one-half (47%) of center participants in 2012 (3). Using data from the National Study of Long-Term Care Providers, this report presents selected characteristics of adult day services center participants in 2012 and compares the characteristics of participants in for-profit centers with those in nonprofit centers.