RESUMO
In the hospital, the geriatric missions of nurses and paramedical and medical teams are essential in order to benefit elderly patients and to fight against the immobilization syndrome through responsiveness and quality care. This care takes place in parallel with the specific medical care of the medical pathologies treated. In 2017, the High Authority for Health advocated good professional practices to avoid iatrogenic dependence of hospitalized elderly people. Through this article, we carry out a focus on the immobilization syndrome and its deleterious consequences: we must not do in the place of the elderly subject!
Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Hospitais , Doença Iatrogênica , Idoso , Humanos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
We have further extended our compartmental model describing the spread of the infection in Italy. As in our previous work, the model assumes that the time evolution of the observable quantities (number of people still positive to the infection, hospitalized and fatalities cases, healed people, and total number of people that has contracted the infection) depends on average parameters, namely people diffusion coefficient, infection cross-section, and population density. The model provides information on the tight relationship between the variation of the reported infection cases and a well-defined observable physical quantity: the average number of people that lie within the daily displacement area of any single person. With respect to our previous paper, we have extended the analyses to several regions in Italy, characterized by different levels of restrictions and we have correlated them to the diffusion coefficient. Furthermore, the model now includes self-consistent evaluation of the reproduction index, effect of immunization due to vaccination, and potential impact of virus variants on the dynamical evolution of the outbreak. The model fits the epidemic data in Italy, and allows us to strictly relate the time evolution of the number of hospitalized cases and fatalities to the change of people mobility, vaccination rate, and appearance of an initial concentration of people positives for new variants of the virus.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Simulação por Computador , Evolução Molecular , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Número Básico de Reprodução , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/virologia , Modelos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Densidade Demográfica , SARS-CoV-2/classificaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: With the widespread prevalence of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), cancer patients are suggested to wear a surgical mask during radiation treatment. In this study, cone beam CT (CBCT) was used to investigate the effect of surgical mask on setup errors in head and neck radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 91 patients with head and neck tumors were selected. CBCT was performed to localize target volume after patient set up. The images obtained by CBCT before treatment were automatically registered with CT images and manually fine-tuned. The setup errors of patients in 6 directions of Vrt, Lng, Lat, Pitch, Roll and Rotation were recorded. The patients were divided into groups according to whether they wore the surgical mask, the type of immobilization mask used and the location of the isocenter. The setup errors of patients were calculated. A t-test was performed to detect whether it was statistically significant. RESULTS: In the 4 groups, the standard deviation in the directions of Lng and Pitch of the with surgical mask group were all higher than that in the without surgical mask group. In the head-neck-shoulder mask group, the mean in the Lng direction of the with surgical mask group was larger than that of the without surgical mask group. In the lateral isocenter group, the mean in the Lng and Pitch directions of the with surgical mask group were larger than that of the without surgical mask group. The t-test results showed that there was significant difference in the setup error between the 2 groups (p = 0.043 and p = 0.013, respectively) only in the Lng and Pitch directions of the head-neck-shoulder mask group. In addition, the setup error of 6 patients with immobilization open masks exhibited no distinguished difference from that of the patients with regular immobilization masks. CONCLUSION: In the head and neck radiotherapy patients, the setup error was affected by wearing surgical mask. It is recommended that the immobilization open mask should be used when the patient cannot finish the whole treatment with a surgical mask.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Máscaras , Erros de Configuração em Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imobilização/instrumentação , Imobilização/métodos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Máscaras/efeitos adversos , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/métodos , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/normas , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/efeitos adversos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologia , Ombro , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to analyze the hospitalization costs for immobile patients with hemorrhagic stroke (IHS) or ischemic stroke (IIS) in China and to determine the factors associated with hospitalization costs. METHODS: We evaluated patients with IHS and IIS hospitalized between November 2015 and July 2016 in six provinces or municipality cities of China. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the association with hospitalization costs and predictors. RESULTS: In total, 1573 patients with IHS and 3143 with IIS were enrolled and analyzed. For IHS and IIS, the average length of stay (LoS) was 17.40 ± 12.3 and 14.47 ± 11.55 days. The duration of immobility was 12.11 ± 9.98 and 7.36 ± 9.77 days, respectively. Median hospitalization costs were RMB 47000.68 (interquartile range 19,827.37, 91,877.09) for IHS and RMB 16578.44 (IQR 7020.13, 36,357.65) for IIS. In both IHS and IIS groups, medicine fees accounted for more than one-third of hospitalization costs. Materials fees and medical service fees accounted for the second and third largest proportions of hospital charges in both groups. Linear regression analysis showed that LoS, hospital level, and previous surgery were key determinants of hospitalization costs in all immobile patients with stroke. Subgroup analysis indicated that hospital level was highly correlated with hospitalization costs for IHS whereas pneumonia and deep vein thrombosis were key factors associated with hospitalization costs for IIS. CONCLUSIONS: We found that hospitalization costs were notably higher in IHS than IIS, and medicine fees accounted for the largest proportion of hospitalization costs in both patient groups, perhaps because most patients ended up with complications such as pneumonia thereby requiring more medications. LoS and hospital level may greatly affect hospitalization costs. Increasing the reimbursement ratio of medical insurance for patients with IHS is recommended. Decreasing medicine fees and LoS, preventing complications, and improving treatment capability may help to reduce the economic burden of stroke in China.
Assuntos
Acidente Vascular Cerebral Hemorrágico/terapia , Hospitalização/economia , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , China , Custos e Análise de Custo/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment practices (immobilisation vs non-immobilisation) of toddler fractures and other minor tibial fractures (both proven and suspected) in preschoolers, aged 9 months-4 years, and examine rates of ED re-presentations and complications. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of presentations of minor tibial fractures, both proven (radiologically confirmed) or suspected (negative X-ray but clinical evidence of bony injury), in children aged 9 months-4 years presenting to a single tertiary level paediatric ED from May 2016 to April 2018. Data collected included treatment practices, subsequent unscheduled re-presentations (including reasons) and complications (defined as problems relating to the injury that required further active care). RESULTS: A search of medical records yielded 240 cases: 102 had proven fractures (spiral, buckle or Salter-Harris II) and 138 were diagnosed with a suspected fracture. 73.5% of proven fractures were immobilised, predominantly with backslabs. 79% of suspected fractures were treated with expectant observation without immobilisation. Patients treated with immobilisation were more likely to re-present to ED compared with non-immobilised patients (18/104, 17.3% vs 9/136, 6.6% RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.23 to 5.58). 21 complications were seen in 19/104 (18.3%) immobilised patients. There were eight skin complications (complication rate of 7.7%) and 11 cast issues (complication rate of 10.6%). Two (1.5%) of the 136 patients had complications related to pain or limp. Pain was uncommonly found, although follow-up was not universal. CONCLUSION: In our centre, proven minor tibial fractures were more likely to receive a backslab, whereas for suspected fractures, expectant observation without immobilisation was performed. Although there is potential bias in the identification of complications with immobilisation, the study suggests that non-immobilisation approach should be investigated.
Assuntos
Imobilização/normas , Radiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas da Tíbia/complicações , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imobilização/métodos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Masculino , Radiografia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/terapiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare dosimetric parameters and late gastrointestinal outcomes between patients treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) for localized prostate cancer with rectal balloon immobilization versus a hydrogel rectal spacer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with localized, clinical stage T1-4 prostate adenocarcinoma were treated at a single institution using conventionally fractionated, dose-escalated PBT from 2013 to 2018. Patient-reported gastrointestinal toxicity was prospectively collected, and the incidence of rectal bleeding was retrospectively reviewed from patient records. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were treated with rectal balloon immobilization, and 75 were treated with a rectal spacer. Rectal hydrogel spacer significantly improved rectal dosimetry while maintaining excellent target coverage. The 2-year actuarial rate of grade 2+ late rectal bleeding was 19% and 3% in the rectal balloon and hydrogel spacer groups, respectively (P = .003). In univariable analysis, the probability of grade 2+ rectal bleeding was significantly correlated with increasing rectal dose. In multivariable analysis, only receipt of spacer hydrogel (hazard ratio, 0.145; P = .010) and anticoagulation use (hazard ratio, 5.019; P < .001) were significantly associated with grade 2+ bleeding. At 2-year follow-up, patient-reported Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel quality of life composite scores were less diminished in the hydrogel spacer group (absolute mean difference, 5.5; P = .030). CONCLUSIONS: Use of rectal hydrogel spacer for prostate PBT is associated with a significantly lower incidence of clinically relevant, late rectal bleeding and lower decrement in long-term, patient-reported bowel quality of life compared with rectal balloon immobilization. Our results suggest that hydrogel spacer may improve rectal sparing compared with rectal balloon immobilization during PBT for prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Hidrogéis , Imobilização/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Marcadores Fiduciais , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorroidas/complicações , Humanos , Imobilização/instrumentação , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Órgãos em Risco/diagnóstico por imagem , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Terapia com Prótons/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Glândulas Seminais/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The risk factors for the detachment of big thrombi from the vessel wall in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are still not clear, which are potential risks for pulmonary embolism (PE). This study was aimed to identify the risk factors for big thrombi detaching from the vessel wall in the patients with lower extremity DVT and to identify the role of the lower limb immobilization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patients whose inferior vena cava (IVC) filter were removed in our hospital. Baseline data and clinical characteristics of all patients were reviewed, including hypertension, diabetes, D-dimer, the onset site of the thrombus, major surgery and lower limb immobilization. The size of the thrombus in the removed IVC filter was assessed by digital subtraction angiography. The thrombus above 1 cm in diameter was defined as potential thrombus of PE and the thrombus below 1 cm as non-potential thrombus of PE. The characteristics and potential risk factors of the patients with potential thrombus of PE were compared with those with non-potential thrombus of PE. Independent risk factors were further analyzed using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-nine patients were included in the study. There is no significant difference in age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, D-dimer, or the thrombus site between the two groups. Major surgery and mobile lower limb were independent risk factors for potential thrombus of PE. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that major surgery and mobile lower limb were independent risk factors for potential thrombus of PE in patients with DVT. Immobilization of lower limb might play a protective role in preventing big thrombi from detaching from the vessel wall in patients with DVT.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Extremidade Inferior , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Filtros de Veia Cava , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Angiografia Digital , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Fatores de Proteção , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Trombose Venosa/complicaçõesRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the management of torsional humeral shaft fractures in a group of expert shoulder and elbow surgeons and analyse the rate of return to sport of these throwing athletes. METHODS: A survey was sent to all physician members of two prominent sports medicine professional associations: the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the Herodicus Society. Due to the rare nature of this injury, a historical survey of management and return to play was performed to allow analysis of trends in treatment and return to play after both non-operative and operative management. RESULTS: The survey was emailed to 858 physician members. Out of the 95 respondents, 35 surgeons indicated they had treated ≥ 1 torsional humeral shaft fractures in throwing athletes (average 1.7 per surgeon). A total of 72 fractures were recorded with an average age of 20.4 years and the majority being male (68/72). Eighty-one percent (58/72) of the fractures were classified as simple spiral. Sixty-one percent (44/72) of the fractures were treated non-operatively, while 35% (25/72) of the fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Patient age, return to sport rate and level, type of fracture, and fracture healing time did not significantly differ based on treatment type. Average time to return to sport was significantly shorter for patients who underwent ORIF compared to non-operative treatment (p = 0.001). Overall, 48 (92.3%) of the 52 athletes returned to sport, with 84% (36/43) returning to the same level of play. CONCLUSION: Torsional humeral shaft fractures in throwers are most commonly seen in young men and can be treated both operatively and non-operatively with overall similar results for healing time, rate of non-union, and return to sport. The only significant difference in the groups was an earlier return to sports in those fixed surgically, however, operative intervention also yielded a higher complication rate. Regardless of the treatment method, the overall rate of return to play was moderate. These finding are clinically relevant and can assist physicians with decision making for treatment and can help when advising throwers of appropriate expectations for recovery after this injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Volta ao Esporte , Adolescente , Adulto , Braquetes/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/estatística & dados numéricos , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas Fechadas/terapia , Humanos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Redução Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff disease is a major medical and economic burden due to a growing aging population, but management of rotator cuff tears remains controversial. We hypothesized that there is no difference in outcomes between patients who undergo rotator cuff repair and matched patients treated nonoperatively. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a prospective cohort of patients over 18 years of age who had a full-thickness rotator cuff tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively evaluated. After clinical evaluation, each patient elected to undergo either rotator cuff repair or nonsurgical treatment. Demographic information was collected at enrollment, and self-reported outcome measures (the Normalized Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index [WORCnorm], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score [ASES], Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation [SANE], and pain score on a visual analog scale [VAS]) were collected at baseline and at 6, 12, and >24 months. The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was used to assess health status at enrollment. The size and degree of atrophy of the rotator cuff tear were classified on MRI. Propensity score analysis was used to create rotator cuff repair and nonsurgical groups matched by age, sex, symptom duration, FCI, tear size, injury mechanism, and atrophy. The Student t test, chi-square test, and regression analysis were used to compare the treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients in each group were available for analysis after propensity score matching. There were no differences between the groups with regard to demographics or rotator cuff tear characteristics. For all outcome measures at the time of final follow-up, the rotator cuff repair group had significantly better outcomes than the nonsurgical treatment group (p < 0.001). At the time of final follow-up, the mean outcome scores (and 95% confidence interval) for the surgical repair and nonsurgical treatment groups were, respectively, 81.4 (76.9, 85.9) and 68.8 (63.7, 74.0) for the WORCnorm, 86.1 (82.4, 90.3) and 76.2 (72.4, 80.9) for the ASES, 77.5 (70.6, 82.5) and 66.9 (61.0, 72.2) for the SANE, and 14.4 (10.2, 20.2) and 27.8 (22.5, 33.5) for the pain VAS. In the longitudinal regression analysis, better outcomes were independently associated with younger age, shorter symptom duration, and rotator cuff repair. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear reported improvement in pain and functional outcome scores with nonoperative treatment or surgical repair. However, patients who were offered and chose rotator cuff repair reported greater improvement in outcome scores and reduced pain compared with those who chose nonoperative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Lesões do Manguito Rotador/terapia , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Artroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Musculoesquelética/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/etiologia , Ruptura/etiologia , Ruptura/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: In acute heart failure (AHF), immobilization is caused because of unstable haemodynamics and dyspnoea, leading to protein wasting. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been reported to preserve muscle mass and improve functional outcomes in chronic disease. NMES may be effective against protein wasting frequently manifested in patients with AHF; however, whether NMES can be implemented safely without any adverse effect on haemodynamics has remained unknown. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of NMES in patients with AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with AHF were randomly assigned to the NMES or control group. The intensity of the NMES group was set at 10-20% maximal voluntary contraction level, whereas the control group was limited at a visible or palpable level of muscle contraction. The sessions were performed 5 days per week since the day after admission. Before the study implementation, we set the feasibility criteria with following items: (i) change in systolic blood pressure (BP) > ±20 mmHg during the first session; (ii) increase in heart rate (HR) > +20 b.p.m. during the first session; (iii) development of sustained ventricular arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation (AF), and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia during all sessions; (iv) incidence of new-onset AF during the hospitalization period < 40%; and (v) completion of the planned sessions by >70% of patients. The criteria of feasibility were set as follows; the percentage to fill one of (i)-(iii) was <20% of the total subjects, and both (iv) and (v) were satisfied. A total of 73 patients (median age 72 years, 51 men) who completed the first session were analysed (NMES group, n = 34; control group, n = 39). Systolic BP and HR variations were not significantly different between two groups (systolic BP, P = 0.958; HR, P = 0.665). Changes in BP > ±20 mmHg or HR > +20 b.p.m. were observed in three cases in the NMES group (8.8%) and five in the control group (12.8%). New-onset arrhythmia was not observed during all sessions in both groups. During hospitalization, one patient newly developed AF in the NMES group (2.9%), and one developed AF (2.6%) and two lethal ventricular arrhythmia in the control group. Thirty-one patients in the NMES group (91%) and 33 patients in the control group (84%) completed the planned sessions during hospitalization. This study fulfilled the preset feasibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS: NMES is feasible in patients with AHF from immediately after admission.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Síndrome de Emaciação/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Doença Crônica , Dispneia/complicações , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/reabilitação , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatologia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiologia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/fisiopatologia , Flutter Ventricular/epidemiologia , Flutter Ventricular/mortalidade , Flutter Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Emaciação/metabolismo , Síndrome de Emaciação/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Emaciação/reabilitaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Owing to the rare nature and presentation of upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) and the high mobility of associated anatomy, various patient positioning strategies are used for radiation therapy. The purpose of this study is to measure the interfractional setup errors associated with upper extremity sarcomas using different immobilization methods through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: All patients treated with daily CBCT guidance for upper extremity STSs during 2014-2015 were identified and triaged based on type of immobilization. After defining an optimal region of interest for image registration, daily CBCT images were automatically registered to reference CT images to quantify positional discrepancies. Means and standard deviations were calculated, and one-way analysis of variance was calculated to determine significance of data. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with upper extremity sarcoma met inclusion criteria: 13 were treated to the shoulder/axilla/upper arm and 4 to the arm/elbow/forearm. Three main types of immobilization were identified: vacuum cradle with custom thermoplastic shell, vacuum cradle alone, and no immobilization accessory used. Patient repositioning occurred if translational and rotational displacements were larger than 1 mm and 5°, respectively, as per institutional guidelines. Patient repositioning rates were 18% for vacuum cradle with thermoplastic shells, 15% for vacuum cradles only, and 6% for no immobilization accessories. Mean translational displacements in right/left (R/L), superior/inferior (S/I), and anterior/posterior (A/P) directions were -0.04 ± 0.33 cm, 0.32 ± 0.33 cm, and 0.12 ± 0.25 cm for vacuum cradle with thermoplastic shell; 0.25 ± 0.10 cm, -0.07 ± 0.22 cm, and 0.00 ± 0.17 cm for vacuum cradle alone; and 0.14 ± 0.15 cm, 0.08 ± 0.45 cm, and -0.01 ± 0.24 cm for no immobilization. For all patients, rotational displacements in the pitch, roll, and yaw were 0.15 ± 1.99°, 0.31 ± 2.11°, and -0.21 ± 1.76°, respectively. There were significant (P < .05) differences in systematic error values for all translational and rotational axes between immobilization methods. CONCLUSION: Large interfractional errors, especially in the rotational axes, were observed, regardless of immobilization strategy. Small study population and unequal representation of different parts of the upper extremity are identified limitations. The need for better immobilization techniques for upper extremity STS treatments is clearly demonstrated.
Assuntos
Imobilização , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles , Extremidade Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Humanos , Imobilização/métodos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Posicionamento do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/radioterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the Emergency Department cervical spine immobilisation precautions are frequently used. There is controversy in regard to the balance of risks and benefits of routine immobilisation in conscious patients. METHODS: A prospective multi-methods evaluation in a tertiary trauma referral centre. The objectives were to investigate current practices and rate of concordance with established international guidelines. A provider survey focused on current knowledge, skills and attitudes and was disseminated to nurses, doctors and paramedics treating trauma patients. Additionally, clinical data were collected on a cohort of immobilised trauma patients. Demographic data were analysed using SPSS and content analysis was completed by manifest coding. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 85.2%. Interdisciplinary providers included nurses (n=46), doctors (n=68) and paramedics (n=41). Content analysis revealed a range of themes for improving care. Themes identified included improved application of guidelines, tailored use of equipment in low-risk patients, improved access to radiology results, and staff education. The series of five case vignettes provided to participants revealed a high level of variance in intended approaches to immobilisation. In the cohort of trauma patients (n=54), the median age was 54 years and the most common mechanism of injury was falls (40.7%). Median time spent with immobilisation was 325min. Adherence to a recognised decision tool was 35/54 (64.8%). Precautions were initiated by paramedics in 42/54 (77.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread dissemination of guidelines, observed approaches to patient immobilisation appear to be highly variable in this trauma centre. Reducing variation for low-risk patients is likely to improve the patient journey and minimise the risk of prolonged immobilisation. Further assessment of the causes of variation could define goals for targeted translational change.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Imobilização/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Vértebras Cervicais/fisiopatologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales , Estudos Prospectivos , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/normas , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A nightstick fracture is an isolated fracture of the ulnar shaft. Although operative and non-operative treatments have been commonly decided by the degree of displacement of the fracture, still there is a controversy specially in those moderately displaced. Herein we report our experience with nightstick fractures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate operative and non-operative treatment of nightstick fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical notes, physiotherapy letters and radiographs of 52 patients with isolated ulnar shaft fractures. Outcome Measurements included radiographic healing, post-operative range of motion and complications. RESULTS: The study included 13 females and 39 males, with a mean age of 26 years [range, 18-93 years]. The mean Follow-up period was 32 months ranged from 12 to 54 months. Ten patients were treated non-operatively; forty-two patients had open reduction and internal fixation including six open fractures. The average wait for surgery was 2.5 days. Mobilisation was commenced immediately after the surgeries non-load bearing. 40 patients had no complications post-operatively with good outcome and average of four visits follow-up. In the non-operative group, five out ten failed and had a mean follow-up of nine visits. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory outcome is to be expected with open reduction and internal fixation. Fractures with less than 50% displacement should be treated on individual bases, considering; age, pre-morbid functional status, co-morbidities, compliance and associated injuries.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/estatística & dados numéricos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas da Ulna/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas da Ulna/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Ulna/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, incidence, and the associated factors of pressure injuries (PIs) among immobile hospitalised patients in China. Being immobile during hospitalisation put these patients at a higher risk of PIs. There is little literature about pressure injury (PI) prevalence or PI incidence in immobile hospitalised patients in hospitals in China. This was a multicentre, cross-sectional, exploratory descriptive study. A total of 23 985 immobile patients were recruited from 25 general hospitals in six provinces of China from November 1, 2015 to March 18, 2016. Information was collected on demographic characteristics, physical assessment information, and treatment and nursing care measures. The PI period prevalence was 3.38%, and the PI cumulative incidence was 1.23%. Most PIs (84.03%) were Stage 1 or Stage 2. A total of 48.22% of PIs occurred in the sacrum or heel region. In the multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with higher PI prevalence: age, gender, length of immobility, type of hospital, modified Braden Scale score, urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, low serum albumin, the usage of fixation or restraint devices, and patient's discharge diagnosis (lower limb fracture, malnutrition, and spinal cord injury). PI prevalence for immobile hospitalised patients in the study was lower than those reported in literature. However, because of the large population in China, the number of patients who suffer with PIs can be very high. The relating factors of higher PI prevalence identified in this study were consistent with current literature. Patients with a higher number of these associated factors should be monitored more closely, and preventative measures should be taken to prevent PI occurrence in high-risk populations.
Assuntos
Hospitais Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wrist fractures, involving the distal radius, are the most common fractures in children. Most are buckle fractures, which are stable fractures, unlike greenstick and other usually displaced fractures. There is considerable variation in practice, such as the extent of immobilisation for buckle fractures and use of surgery for seriously displaced fractures. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions for common distal radius fractures in children, including skeletally immature adolescents. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, trial registries and reference lists to May 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing interventions for treating distal radius fractures in children. We sought data on physical function, treatment failure, adverse events, time to return to normal activities (recovery time), wrist pain, and child (and parent) satisfaction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently performed study screening and selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction. We pooled data where appropriate and used GRADE for assessing the quality of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 30 included studies, 21 were RCTs, seven were quasi-RCTs and two did not describe their randomisation method. Overall, 2930 children were recruited. Typically, trials included more male children and reported mean ages between 8 and 10 years. Eight studies recruited buckle fractures, five recruited buckle and other stable fractures, three recruited minimally displaced fractures and 14 recruited displaced fractures, typically requiring closed reduction, typically requiring closed reduction. All studies were at high risk of bias, mainly reflecting lack of blinding. The studies made 14 comparisons. Below we consider five prespecified comparisons:Removable splint versus below-elbow cast for predominantly buckle fractures (6 studies, 695 children)One study (66 children) reported similar Modified Activities Scale for Kids - Performance scores (0 to 100; no disability) at four weeks (median scores: splint 99.04; cast 99.11); low-quality evidence. Thirteen children needed a change or reapplication of device (splint 5/225; cast 8/219; 4 studies); very low-quality evidence. One study (87 children) reported no refractures at six months. One study (50 children) found no between-group difference in pain during treatment; very low-quality evidence. Evidence was absent (recovery time), insufficient (children with minor complications) or contradictory (child or parent satisfaction). Two studies estimated lower healthcare costs for removable splints.Soft or elasticated bandage versus below-elbow cast for buckle or similar fractures (4 studies, 273 children)One study (53 children) reported more children had no or only limited disability at four weeks in the bandage group; very low-quality evidence. Eight children changed device or extended immobilisation for delayed union (bandage 5/90; cast 3/91; 3 studies); very low-quality evidence. Two studies (139 children) reported no serious adverse events at four weeks. Evidence was absent, insufficient or contradictory for recovery time, wrist pain, children with minor complications, and child and parent satisfaction. More bandage-group participants found their treatment convenient (39 children).Removal of casts at home by parents versus at the hospital fracture clinic by clinicians (2 studies, 404 children, mainly buckle fractures)One study (233 children) found full restoration of physical function at four weeks; low-quality evidence. There were five treatment changes (home 4/197; hospital 1/200; 2 studies; very low-quality evidence). One study found no serious adverse effects at six months (288 children). Recovery time and number of children with minor complications were not reported. There was no evidence of a difference in pain at four weeks (233 children); low-quality evidence. One study (80 children) found greater parental satisfaction in the home group; low-quality evidence. One UK study found lower healthcare costs for home removal.Below-elbow versus above-elbow casts for displaced or unstable both-bone fractures (4 studies, 399 children)Short-term physical function data were unavailable but very low-quality evidence indicated less dependency when using below-elbow casts. One study (66 children with minimally displaced both-bone fractures) found little difference in ABILHAND-Kids scores (0 to 42; no problems) (mean scores: below-elbow 40.7; above-elbow 41.8); very low-quality evidence. Overall treatment failure data are unavailable, but nine of the 11 remanipulations or secondary reductions (366 children, 4 studies) were in the above-elbow group; very low-quality evidence. There was no refracture or compartment syndrome at six months (215 children; 2 studies). Recovery time and overall numbers of children with minor complications were not reported. There was little difference in requiring physiotherapy for stiffness (179 children, 2 studies); very low-quality evidence. One study (85 children) found less pain at one week for below-elbow casts; low-quality evidence. One study found treatment with an above-elbow cast cost three times more in Nepal.Surgical fixation with percutaneous wiring and cast immobilisation versus cast immobilisation alone after closed reduction of displaced fractures (5 studies, 323 children)Where reported, above-elbow casts were used. Short-term functional outcome data were unavailable. One study (123 children) reported similar ABILHAND-Kids scores indicating normal physical function at six months (mean scores: surgery 41.9; cast only 41.4); low-quality evidence. There were fewer treatment failures, defined as early or problematic removal of wires or remanipulation for early loss in position, after surgery (surgery 20/124; cast only 41/129; 4 studies; very low-quality evidence). Similarly, there were fewer serious advents after surgery (surgery 28/124; cast only 43/129; 4 studies; very low-quality evidence). Recovery time, wrist pain, and satisfaction were not reported. There was lower referral for physiotherapy for stiffness after surgery (1 study); very low-quality evidence. One USA study found similar treatment costs in both groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Where available, the quality of the RCT-based evidence on interventions for treating wrist fractures in children is low or very low. However, there is reassuring evidence of a full return to previous function with no serious adverse events, including refracture, for correctly-diagnosed buckle fractures, whatever the treatment used. The review findings are consistent with the move away from cast immobilisation for these injuries. High-quality evidence is needed to address key treatment uncertainties; notably, some priority topics are already being tested in ongoing multicentre trials, such as FORCE.
Assuntos
Bandagens/estatística & dados numéricos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas do Rádio/terapia , Contenções/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Imobilização/métodos , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Traumatismos do PunhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify factors during trauma evaluation that increase the likelihood of errors in cervical spine immobilization ('lapses'). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multivariate analysis was used to identify the associations between patient characteristics, event features, and tasks performed in proximity to the head and neck and the occurrence and duration of a lapse in maintaining cervical spine immobilization during 56 pediatric trauma evaluations. RESULTS: Lapses in cervical spine immobilization occurred in 71.4% of patients (n = 40), with an average of 1.2 ± 1.3 lapses per patient. Head and neck tasks classified as oxygen manipulation occurred an average of 12.2 ± 9.7 times per patient, whereas those related to neck examination and cervical collar manipulation occurred an average of 2.7 ± 1.7 and 2.1 ± 1.2 times per patient, respectively. More oxygen-related tasks were performed among patients who had than those who did not have a lapse (27.3 ± 16.5 versus 11.5 ± 8.0 tasks, P = 0.001). Patients who had cervical collar placement or manipulation had a two-fold higher risk of a lapse than those who did not have these tasks performed (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.56, 3.28, P = 0.006). More lapses occurred during evaluations on the weekend (P = 0.01), when more tasks related to supplemental oxygen manipulation were performed (P = 0.02) and when more tasks associated with cervical collar management were performed (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Errors in cervical spine immobilization were frequently observed during the initial evaluation of injured children. Strategies to reduce these errors should target approaches to head and neck management during the primary and secondary phases of trauma evaluation.
Assuntos
Imobilização/efeitos adversos , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Exame Físico/efeitos adversos , Análise de Causa Fundamental/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imobilização/instrumentação , Imobilização/normas , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Pescoço , Dispositivos de Fixação Ortopédica , Exame Físico/normas , Exame Físico/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Causa Fundamental/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravação em VídeoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is a common procedure in postbariatric surgery. Over the years, a high number of technical refinements of the procedure have been established to improve safety and reduce associated complications. Nevertheless, the complication rate is high. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty in association with prolonged postoperative immobilization. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 82 patients who underwent abdominoplasty was performed. Patients were divided in two study groups regarding their immobilization period. Group 1 included patients with an immobilization period defined as strict bed rest for at least 45 h after surgery. Group 2 included all patients with shorter immobilization time, but earliest mobilization in the evening on the day of surgery. RESULTS: Overall, complication rate was 27%. Major complications were observed in 15% in group 1 and in 23% in group 2. Hematoma requiring surgical revision was observed in 5% in group 1 and in 14% in group 2. Surgical revisions within the first 60 days were necessary in 5% in group 1 and in 20% in group 2. CONCLUSION: Prolonged immobilization after abdominoplasty does not crucially lower the overall complication rate, but influences the severity of complications in a positive way. Increasing the duration of postoperative immobilization up to 45 h after abdominoplasty significantly decreases the reoperation rate in our practice. The risk for a surgical revision is nearly four times higher if the patient leaves bed earlier. Surgeons should consider this option especially in patients with a high risk for complication development.
Assuntos
Abdominoplastia , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Abdominoplastia/efeitos adversos , Abdominoplastia/métodos , Abdominoplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Imobilização/efeitos adversos , Imobilização/métodos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the latest findings of congenital and acquired diseases related to stone formation and help understanding the multitude of cofactors related to urolithiasis. RECENT FINDINGS: Urolithiasis is related to a broad spectrum of congenital and acquired diseases and its management varies according to the stone type, underlying disease or recurrence rate, but it also changes according to recent findings and developments. As prevalence of urolithiasis is constantly increasing, identification of high-risk stone formers and early treatment is essential. Therefore, genetic evaluation like whole exome sequencing becomes a pertinent part of further diagnostics. SUMMARY: Stone formation is a very heterogeneous pathomechanism. This prompt us to look at every patient individually particularly in high-risk patients, including stone and 24-h-urine analysis and additional diagnostic work-up based on stone type or underlying disease.
Assuntos
Urolitíase/epidemiologia , Acidose Tubular Renal/epidemiologia , Adenina Fosforribosiltransferase/deficiência , Fibrose Cística/epidemiologia , Cistinúria/epidemiologia , Doença de Dent/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Hiperoxalúria Primária/epidemiologia , Hiperparatireoidismo/epidemiologia , Imobilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Lesch-Nyhan/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/epidemiologia , Nefrocalcinose/epidemiologia , Doenças Renais Policísticas/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Sarcoidose/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Xantina Desidrogenase/deficiênciaRESUMO
Introducción: Las luxaciones constituyen del 10 % al 25 % de todas las lesiones en el codo. Aproximadamente el 15% de los pacientes que la han sufrido quedan con algún síntoma compatible con inestabilidad. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar en la literatura los diferentes tratamientos propuestos para esta complicación luego de una luxación simple de codo. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en bases de datos: Medline (interfase Pub-Med) y Bireme para estudios de los últimos diez años. Se seleccionaron los artículos que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, extrayendo de ellos los datos relevantes y resultados. La búsqueda arrojó un total de 596 artículos de los cuales 10 cumplían con los criterios de inclusión propuestos al iniciar la búsqueda. Discusión: Se analizaron y compararon las tasas de inestabilidad luego de la luxación, los diferentes tipos de tratamiento y las complicaciones. Conclusión: Existe consenso en la literatura analizada de que debe realizarse un examen de estabilidad del codo en agudo para definir el tratamiento. En cuanto al tratamiento en los codos que se presentan inestables la literatura es variable y faltan estudios comparativos para realizar recomendaciones.
Introduction: Dislocations are 10% to 25% of all elbow injuries. Up to 15% of patients with symptoms of instability can be observed. The aim of this study is to review in the literature the different treatments proposed for this complication after a simple elbow dislocation. Materials and Methods: The search was conducted on: Medline (PubMed interface) and Bireme including the last ten years studies. Articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, and the relevant data and results were extracted. We found a total of 596 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria proposed at the start of the search. Discussion: We analyzed and compared the rates of instability after dislocation, the different types of treatment and complications. Conclusion: There is consensus in the analyzed literature that an elbow stability test should be performed in acute conditions to define the treatment.Comparative studies are lacking for recommending a definite treatment for elbow instability.
Introdução: Dislocaçõessão de 10% a 25% de todas as lesões no cotovelo. Aproximadamente 15% dos pacientes ficam com algum síntoma compatívelcom instabilidade. O objetivo deste trabalho é rever na literatura os diferentes tratamentos propostos para esta complicação a pósuma simples deslocação do cotovelo. Materiais e métodos: Uma pesquisa foi feita em bancos de dados: Medline (interface Pub-Med) e Bireme para estudos dos últimos dez anos. Foram selecionados artigos que atendem a os critérios de inclusão e exclusão, extraindo os dados relevantes e os resultados deles. A busca gerou um total de 596 artigos, dos quais 10 atendem a os critérios de incluso propostos no início da pesquisa. Discussão: Analisamos e comparamos as taxas de instabilidade após deslocamento, os diferentes tipos de tratamento e complicações. Conclusão: Existe consenso na literatura analisada segundo a qualum teste de estabilidade do cotobelo deve ser realizado em agudos para definir o tratamento. Sobre o tratamento os cotovelo sin stáveis a literatura é diversa e faltam estudos comparativos para realizar recomendações.