Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.492
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 289, 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745239

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after midline sternotomy of cardiac surgery is a challenging complication that affects the outcome of surgery. This study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of the antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management in the treatment of DSWI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5 patients with DSWI who underwent antibiotic-loaded bone cement combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps for chest wall reconstruction after sternotomy for cardiac surgery in a tertiary hospital in China from January 2020 to December 2021. The clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All patients had no perioperative mortalities, no postoperative complications, 100% wound healing, and an average hospital stay length of 24 days. The follow-up periods were from 6 to 35 months (mean 19.6 months). None of the cases showed wound problems after initial reconstruction using antibiotic-loaded bone cement combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps. CONCLUSIONS: We report our successful treatment of DSWI, using antibiotic-loaded bone cement fixation technique combined with bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps tension-free management. The clinical and follow-up results are favorable.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Cimentos Ósseos , Músculos Peitorais , Esternotomia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Masculino , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Músculos Peitorais/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Esterno/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos
2.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 112, 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622645

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Currently, postoperative wound infection and poor healing of total knee arthroplasty have been perplexing both doctors and patients. We hereby innovatively invented a new dressing system to reduce the incidence of postoperative wound complications. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients who received primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty and then applied the new dressing system. The data collected included the number of dressing changes, postoperative hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), ASEPSIS scores, The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES), wound complications, dressing cost, the frequency of shower and satisfaction. Subsequently, a statistical analysis of the data was performed. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated the average number of postoperative dressing changes was 1.09 ± 0.38, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 3.72 ± 0.98 days. The average cost throughout a treatment cycle was 68.97 ± 12.54 US dollars. Collectively, the results of VAS, KSS, and KOOS revealed that the pain and function of patients were continuously improved. The results of the four indexes of the ASEPSIS score were 0, whereas the SBSES score was 3.58 ± 0.52 and 4.69 ± 0.46 at two weeks and one month after the operation, respectively. We observed no wound complications until one month after the operation. Remarkably, the satisfaction rate of the patients was 91.85 ± 4.99% one month after the operation. CONCLUSION: In this study, we invented a new dressing system for surgical wounds after total knee arthroplasty and further confirmed its clinical feasibility and safety. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ChiCTR2000033814, Registered 13/ June/2020.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Bandagens , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia
3.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14718, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571455

RESUMO

This study comprehensively compared the effects of laparoscopic and open radical cystectomies on postoperative wound infections and complications in patients with bladder cancer. We conducted a systematic search for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases, from database inception to October 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. Overall, 16 studies involving 1427 patients with bladder cancer were included. The analysis revealed that, compared with open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy significantly reduced the incidence of wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.64, p < 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.26-0.47, p < 0.001) and significantly shortened the hospital stay duration (standardised mean difference [SMD] = -1.85, 95%CI: -2.34 to -1.36, p < 0.001). Thus, this study determined that laparoscopic radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer effectively reduced the occurrence of wound infections and complications, and significantly shortened the patient's hospital stay, demonstrating notable therapeutic effectiveness worthy of clinical application.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos
4.
Surg Endosc ; 38(4): 2231-2239, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498213

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biosynthetic meshes afford the cost advantages of being made from fully synthetic material, but are also biodegradable, making them a versatile option that can be used in both clean and contaminated cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and long-term outcomes of using GORE BIO-A (BIO-A) as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction in all wound classes. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients undergoing abdominal hernia repair using BIO-A from October 2008 to June 2018. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence rate. Only patients with at least 6-month follow-up were included when looking at recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included 30-day morbidity categorized according to CDC Surgical Site Infection Criteria, return to operating/procedure room (RTOR), 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were identified, CDC Wound Classification breakdown was 127 (61.4%), 41 (19.8%), 14 (6.8%), and 25 (12.1%) for wound classes I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Median follow-up was 55.4 months (range 0.2-162.4). Overall recurrence rate was 17.4%. Contaminated cases experienced higher recurrence rates (28.8% versus 10.4%, p = 0.002) at a mean follow up of 46.9 and 60.8 months for contaminated and clean patients, respectively. Recurrent patients had higher BMI (32.4 versus 28.4 kg/m2, p = 0.0011), larger hernias (162.2 versus 106.7 cm2, p = 0.10), higher LOS (11.1 versus 5.6 days, p = 0.0051), and higher RTOR rates (16.7% versus 5.6%, p = 0.053). 51 (24.5%) patients experienced some morbidity, including 19 (9.2%) surgical site occurences, 7 (3.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 16 (7.7%) deep surgical site infections, and 1 (0.5%) organ space infection. CONCLUSION: This study affirms the use of biosynthetic mesh as a cost-effective alternative in all wound classifications, yielding good outcomes, limited long-term complications, and low recurrence. rates.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória , Herniorrafia/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva
5.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 91: 302-311, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many options are available for reconstruction after deep sternal wound infections. However, these options have not been critically appraised. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the existing evidence on sternal rewiring versus flap reconstruction and pectoralis major muscle flaps (PMFs) versus greater omental flaps (GOFs). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Outcomes of interest included mortality, treatment failure and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. Nine studies compared flaps to rewiring, reporting on 618 patients. Patients treated with flaps had significantly lower mortality compared with patient treated with rewiring (Risk ratio [RR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.77, P < 0.01). Flap patients had significantly lower treatment failure compared with those who were treated with rewiring (RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.14-0.37, P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed in LOS between patients treated with flaps compared those treated with rewiring (standard mean difference -0.84, 95% CI: -1.91 to 0.24, P = 0.13). Five studies compared PMF with GOF, reporting on 599 patients. No statistically significant differences were found in mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.24-1.68, P = 0.36), LOS (standard mean difference -14.52, 95% CI: -42.00 to 12.96, P = 0.30) or treatment failure (RR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.31-6.07, P = 0.68) in patients treated with PMF compared with patients treated with GOF. CONCLUSIONS: Flap-based reconstruction demonstrated improved mortality and treatment outcomes compared to sternal rewiring. However, no significant differences were observed in outcomes between the PMF- and GOF-based reconstructions.


Assuntos
Músculos Peitorais , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Músculos Peitorais/transplante , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Esterno/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Hernia ; 28(2): 575-584, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345668

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Use of biologic or synthetic mesh in hernia repair shifts is based on evolving evidence. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) biosynthetic mesh is a potential alternative to biologic and synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair (VHR). This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of P4HB mesh in clean and contaminated surgical settings. METHODS: Two authors searched literature on PubMed, reviewing titles and abstracts of all articles to determine inclusion eligibility. Post-operative data were compared via transformation method to convert the proportion of patients with the outcome of interest into a suitable quantity for random-effects synthesis using STATA software. RESULTS: Initial search yielded 287 citations. Six studies were included and categorized on whether hernia repairs were conducted in clean (CDC class I) or contaminated cases (CDC class II-IV). The pooled proportion of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), hernia recurrence, total surgical complications, and reoperation were calculated in 391 clean and 81 contaminated cases. For clean vs. contaminated cases, the following pooled proportions were noted: SSI (2% (CI 0-7%) vs 9% (CI 0-025) (p = 0.03), SSO: 14% (CI 5-25%) vs 35% (CI 22-50%) (p = 0.006), hernia recurrence (8% (CI 1-19%) vs 4% (CI 0-12%) (p = 0.769); surgical complications (17% (CI 6-32%) vs 50% (CI 27-72%) (p = 0.009). Reoperation data were available in 298 clean cases across four studies: 5% (CI 0-15%). CONCLUSIONS: P4HB biosynthetic mesh may be more effective than previously thought, particularly in clean wounds. P4HB may also be superior to biologic mesh when compared to clinical trial data. Further research is necessary for more direct comparison.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Hérnia Ventral , Humanos , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Implantes Absorvíveis , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/complicações , Hidroxibutiratos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 90: 266-272, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sternotomy wound complications are more frequent after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) compared to other cardiac surgeries, primarily due to additional risk factors, including immunosuppression. Flap closure often becomes necessary for definitive treatment, although there is a scarcity of data on the outcomes of sternal wound reconstruction in this specific population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 604 sternal wound reconstructions performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients who underwent OHT as their primary cardiac procedure. Surgical interventions involved sternal hardware removal, debridement, and muscle flap closure. RESULTS: The study included 66 patients, with culture-positive wound infection being the most common indication for reconstruction (51.5%). The median duration between transplantation and sternal wound reconstruction was 25 days. Bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps (n = 63), rectus abdominis flaps (n = 2), or pectoralis major turnover flaps (n = 1) were used. Intraoperative wound cultures revealed positivity in 48 patients (72.7%), with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most frequently cultured organism (25.0%). The overall complication rate was 31.8%, and two patient deaths were related to sternal wounds, resulting from multiorgan failure following septic shock. The majority of the patients reported excellent long-term functional and esthetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal wounds following OHT pose a significant morbidity risk. Our strategy focuses on immediate and aggressive antibiotic therapy, thorough debridement, and definitive closure with bilateral pectoralis myocutaneous advancement flaps. This approach has demonstrated complication and mortality rates comparable to the general cardiac surgery population, as well as excellent functional and esthetic results.


Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Retalho Miocutâneo , Humanos , Desbridamento/métodos , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Músculos Peitorais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Esterno/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Int Wound J ; 21(2): e14670, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361225

RESUMO

Totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (TEP) is a surgical technique for the treatment of hernia. The purpose of this research is to compare the efficacy of both general anaesthesia and spine anaesthesia for TEP herniorrhaphy. The number of patients who received TEP operations related to the injury from 2008 to 2022 was counted in this study. Patients with TEP operation were classified into general anaesthesia and spine anaesthesia. In this research, 186 related articles were found in the data base, and in the end, 8 were analysed. This study involved 2452 cases of hernia. The data of the operation time, the infection of the wound and the bleeding of the wound were analysed. The analysis of the data was done with RevMan 5.3. Results indicated that there was no significant difference between general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia in post-surgical rates for post-operative wound infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.83; p = 0.86); In general anaesthesia, there was no difference in the risk of post-operative wound haematoma when compared with those treated with spinal anaesthesia (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 0.37-23.69; p = 0.31). In the seven trials, there was no difference in the duration of the surgery between the general anaesthetic and the spinal anaesthesia group (mean difference, -1.44; 95% CI, -4.11 to 1.22; p = 0.29). Data from the available meta-analysis indicate that there is no difference in the risk of post-operative wound infection or wound haematoma when treated with TEP.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Hérnia Inguinal , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Cicatrização , Hematoma/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Surgery ; 175(4): 1071-1080, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38218685

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Different unilateral groin hernia repair approaches have been developed in the last 2 decades. The most commonly done approaches are open inguinal hernia repair by the Lichenstein technique, laparoscopic approach by either total extraperitoneal or transabdominal preperitoneal, and robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Hence, this study aimed to compare early and late postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent unilateral robotic transabdominal preperitoneal, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal, and open groin hernia repair using a United States national hernia database, the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Database. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was retrospectively reviewed, including all adult patients who underwent elective unilateral groin hernia repair from 2015 to 2022, with a 1:1 propensity score match analysis conducted for balanced groups. The univariate analysis compared the groups across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes. RESULTS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database identified 14,320 patients who underwent elective unilateral groin hernia repair and had documented 30 days of follow-up. Propensity score matching stratified 1,598 patients to each group (total of 6,392). The median age was 64 years (interquartile range 53-74) for open groin hernia repair, whereas 60 (interquartile range 47-69) for laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, 62 (interquartile range 48-70) for laparoscopic total extraperitoneal, and 60 (interquartile range 47-70) for robotic transabdominal preperitoneal were noted. Open groin hernia repair had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 4 (52, 3%) patients (P < .001). A painful bulge was the most common indication (>85%). Operating room time >2 hours was more significant in the robotic transabdominal preperitoneal group (123, 8%; P < .001). Seroma rate was higher in the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (134, 8%; P < .001). A 1-year analysis had 1,103 patients. Hematoma, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperation, and hernia recurrence at 30 days or 1 year did not differ, with an overall recurrence rate of 6% (n = 67) at 1 year (P = .33). In patients with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, the robotic approach had lower rates of surgical site occurrence (n = 12, 4%; P = .002) and seroma (n = 5, 2%; P < .001) compared with the other groups. When evaluating recurrence 1 year after surgery, the robotic transabdominal preperitoneal group had 10% versus 18% open groin hernia repair, 11% laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, and 18% laparoscopic total extraperitoneal, but it was not statistically significant (P = .53). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection among the surgical techniques at 30 days. However, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal was associated with more seromas. Hernia recurrence at 1 year was similar across groups; the robotic approach had the lowest recurrence rate among all 3 repairs but did not reach statistical significance. The robotic approach performed better in patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 for surgical site occurrence and seroma than in other surgical techniques.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Virilha/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seroma , Pontuação de Propensão , Resultado do Tratamento , Telas Cirúrgicas , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Centro Abdominal
10.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 101, 2024 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297343

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lumbar revision surgery can be performed by simple lumbar nerve decompression or lumbar interbody fusion, including percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), etc. However, lumbar revision surgery is very difficult in surgical operation. We sought to explore the technique safety and efficacy of microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) in lumbar revision surgery. METHODS: Cases of postoperative recurrence following lumbar spine surgery (n = 63) treated from December 2016 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 24 cases of microscope-assisted MI-TLIF (microscopic group) and 39 cases of naked-eye MI-TLIF (naked-eye group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, initial operation, and visual analog score (VAS) of low back and leg pain before and at 7 days and 3 months after the operation and the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. The Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores before and after the operation and the Bridwell interbody fusion grades at 1 year were compared. The independent t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Chi-square tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: All 63 patients were successfully treated by operation and were followed up for an average of 31.5 ± 8.6 months (range 12-48 months). The two groups had no significant difference in sex, age, incision length, initial operation, or operative segment (P > 0.05). There was no significance in operation time, VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score of low back pain or Bridwell interbody fusion grade between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and the lengths of hospital stay were observed between the two groups (P < 0.05). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage (n = 2), edema of nerve roots (n = 2), and incision infection (n = 1) were observed in the naked-eye group. There were no complications in the microscopic group, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, edema of nerve roots, and incision infection. CONCLUSION: Although microscope-assisted MI-TLIF and naked-eye MI-TLIF are both effective during lumbar revision surgery, microscope-assisted MI-TLIF brings less trauma, less bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and faster recovery. Unlike traditional surgery, microscope-assisted MI-TLIF provides a clear visual field, adequate hemostasis, and nerve decompression.


Assuntos
Discotomia Percutânea , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Reoperação , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/cirurgia , Edema
11.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14598, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272810

RESUMO

The impacts of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in comparison with open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative complications, wound infections and hospital length of stay in patients with esophageal carcinoma (ESCA) using meta-analysis to provide reliable evidence for clinical practice. A search strategy was developed and computer searches were performed on Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for clinical studies that reported the effects of MIE in comparison with OE in patients with ESCA. The retrieval time was from their inception to October 2023. Two authors independently performed literature screening, and data extraction and literature quality evaluation were performed separately for the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. Overall, 26 studies with 2427 ESCA patients were included in this study, of which 1203 were in the MIE group and 1224 were in the OE group. The results showed that, compared with OE, ESCA patients who underwent MIE were less likely to develop postoperative wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.20-0.49, p < 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.30, p < 0.001) and have a shorter hospital stay (standardized mean difference = -1.93, 95% CI: -2.38 to -1.48, p < 0.001). MIE has advantages over OE in terms of shorter hospital stay and reduced incidence of postoperative wound infections and complications.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14588, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272813

RESUMO

The assumption is that a number of controlled trials have been conducted to assess the impact of uterus retaining or hysterectomy on wound and haemorrhage, but there is no indication as to which method would be more beneficial for wound healing. This research is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the availability of wound healing in case studies of both operative methods. From inception to October 2023, four databases were reviewed. The odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) for both groups were computed with a random effect model, as well as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A total of five studies were carried out in the overall design and enrolled 16 972 patients. No statistical significance was found in the rate of postoperative wound infection among the two treatments (OR,1.46; 95% CI,0.66,3.22 p = 0.35); The rates of bleeding after surgery did not differ significantly from one procedure to another (OR,1.41; 95% CI,0.91,2.17 p = 0.12); two studies demonstrated no statistical significance for the rate of incisional hernia after surgery (OR,2.58; 95% CI,0.37,18.05 p = 0.34). Our findings indicate that there is a similar risk between uterine preservation and hysterectomies for the incidence of wound infection, haemorrhage and protrusion of incision.


Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional , Prolapso Uterino , Feminino , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Hemorragia/cirurgia
13.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14538, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272825

RESUMO

A meta-analysis investigation was executed to evaluate the effect of tumour necrosis factor-a inhibitor exposure on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. A comprehensive literature investigation till October 2023 was applied, and 82 470 individuals with orthopaedic surgery were in the chosen investigations' starting point. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was utilized to compute the value of the effect of tumour necrosis factor-a inhibitors exposure on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. Tumour necrosis factor uses had significantly higher surgical site infections (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.21-2.25, p = 0.001) compared with tumour necrosis factor non-use in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, no significant difference was found between discontinued and continued tumour necrosis factor on surgical site infections (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-1.05, p = 0.07) in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery.Significantly higher surgical site infections was found comparing tumour necrosis factor uses to non-use; however, no significant difference was found between discontinued and continued tumour necrosis factor on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/cirurgia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos
14.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 72(1): 63-69, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780925

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to define determinants of length of hospital stay (LOS) longer than mean and recurrence of infection (ROI) after complete healing of patients with deep sternal wound infections (DSWI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we included 303 patients (155 females and 148 males, with mean age of 68 years) treated from 2016 to 2020 at the Department of Plastic Surgery of the HELIOS Klinik Krefeld, Germany. All patients received extensive necrosectomy, repetitive negative pressure therapy periods, and final transplantation of a pectoral musculocutaneous flap. In the German diagnosis-related group (DRG)-system, the mean inpatient LOS depends on the number of surgical procedures and is longer in those with four or more surgical procedures (DRG IO2B) and shorter in those with fewer procedures (DRGs I02C and I02D). The determinants which have a significant effect on LOS longer than mean and ROI after complete healing were identified by estimating a logistic regression model. The effect of the different calculated determinants was quantified as odds ratio. To measure the discriminant ability of the model between patients, we determined a receiver operating characteristic curve. The fit of the model was quantified by comparing predicted probabilities of the model with empirical probabilities of the data. The goodness of fit was then measured by applying the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: Among patients in DRG IO2B (n = 246), the variable clopidogrel and therapeutic anticoagulation was the most important determinant for a longer LOS, with an odds ratio of 5.83 (95% CI = 0.83/40.80). Female sex and renal insufficiency also prolonged LOS. Applying this analysis to the patients with group DRG groups I02C and I02D (n = 57), none of these parameters were predictive. The variable immunosuppression was the most important determinant for ROI (n = 49) (OR = 4.67; 95% CI = 1.01/21.52). Body mass index also played a role, but with a much smaller influence. CONCLUSION: There are specific risk factors for LOS longer than mean and ROI in patients with DSWI that can be identified on admission. Addressing these risk factors, if possible, could reduce the rate of patients with LOS longer than mean and ROI.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Esterno/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Músculos
15.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14529, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38069545

RESUMO

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) have been widely applied to treat cervical carcinoma. But LARVH and ARH have not been fully investigated in treating cervical carcinoma after injury associated with injury. This research is intended to provide an up-to-date basis for comparing LARVH with ARH in early stage cervical carcinoma. Comparison between LARVH and ARH in cervical carcinoma was carried out through a combination of related research. Eligible articles from databases such as PubMed and Embase were screened using an established search strategy. This report covered the results of LARVH versus ARH in cervical carcinoma. The average difference and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for the combination of consecutive variables. The combination of categorical variables was performed with the odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval. Through the identification of 1137 publications, eight of them were chosen to be analysed. Among them, 363 were treated with LARVH and 326 were treated with ARH. Eight trials showed that LARVH was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative wound infection than ARH (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1-0.55, p = 0.0009). Five trials showed that there was no difference in the risk of postoperative bleeding after surgery (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.42-3.29, p = 0.76). We also did not differ significantly in the duration of the surgery (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, -6.58 to 10.15, p = 0.68). So, the two surgical methods differ significantly only in the risk of postoperative wound infection.


Assuntos
Carcinoma , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Carcinoma/etiologia , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
16.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 86(1-2): 183-194, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38007643

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The choice of antibiotics and length of administration in the treatment of deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) is unclear. The reason for this is the lack of studies and local differences in resistance. An increase in resistance can be observed in gram-positive cocci, which are the most frequently detected in deep sternal infections. The duration of administration is often 2- 6 weeks or longer, although the benefit of prolonged antibiotic administration has not been confirmed by studies. We evaluated the antibiotic treatment during surgical treatment, consisting of surgical wound debridement and plastic chest reconstruction. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients (n = 260) who underwent reconstructive surgery in the Department of Plastic Surgery at Leipzig University Hospital from 01.05.2012 - 31.12.2020. The duration of intake, results of microbiological swabs and resistance were investigated. RESULTS: At the time of discharge, closed wound conditions were noted in 177 of 260 cases (68.1%). The largest proportion of patients (n = 238) was treated with a latissimus dorsi flap (91.5%).Antibiotic treatment was conducted in 206 of 260 cases (79.2%). The mean duration of antibiotic administration was 21.4 days (±17.6). Prolonged treatment over 14 days did not alter outcome (p = 0.226), in contrast, the number of multidrug resistances (p < 0.001). There was no prove of resistance against linezolid which is effective against the most common found infectious agents Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 93; 24.0 %) & Staphylococcus aureus (n = 47; 12.1 %). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence of benefit from antibiotic therapy over 14 days, whereas multidrug resistance increases with prolonged antibiotic use. In the absence of infectious agents or clinical signs of inflammation, surgical treatment without additional antibiotic treatment is effective.Linezolid is a suitable antibiotic in the treatment of gram-positive infections which are the most frequent in DSWI.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Linezolida/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
17.
Surg Endosc ; 38(2): 1013-1019, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091108

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retromuscular sublay (RMS) technique for repair of ventral hernias has gained popularity due to lower risk of recurrence and wound complications. Robotic approaches to RMS have been shown to decrease hospital stay; however, previous studies have failed to show a significant reduction in wound morbidity. Utilizing the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database, this study sought to determine the effect of robotic approach on wound morbidity, while specifically focusing on a high-risk population. METHODS: A retrospective review of elective robotic and open RMS repairs in the ACHQC database was performed. Patients deemed to be high-risk for wound complications were included: adult patients with BMI greater than 35 and who were either current smokers or diabetics. A propensity score match was then done to balance covariates between the two groups. Main outcomes of concern were surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), and surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) at 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 917 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 211 patients matched for each approach. There was no difference in overall SSO (18% for Open vs 23% for Robotic, p = 0.23). Open repair was associated with higher rates of SSI (4% vs 1%, p = 0.032) and SSOPI (9% SSOPI vs 3%, p < 0. 015). As seen in previous studies, there was a higher rate of seroma associated with Robotic RMS repair (87% vs 48%, p < 0.001) in patients that developed an SSO. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, a robotic approach was associated with decreased rates of SSI and SSOPI in obese patients who were either current smokers or diabetics. In effort to reduce wound morbidity and the associated physical and economic costs, robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair should be considered in this patient population.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Adulto , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Pontuação de Propensão , Hérnia Ventral/complicações , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Morbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos
18.
Surg Endosc ; 38(2): 1005-1012, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38082008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complex ventral hernias are frequently repaired via an open transversus abdominis release (TAR). Obesity, particularly a BMI > 40, is a strong predictor of wound morbidity following this procedure. We aimed to determine if preoperative weight loss may still be beneficial in patients with persistently elevated BMIs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent open TAR at a tertiary academic medical center from January 2018 to December 2021 was completed. Demographics, medical history, operative details, and postoperative data were analyzed. Weight and BMI were recorded at three time points: > 6 months prior to initial surgical consultation, surgical consultation, and day of surgery. RESULTS: In total, 182 patients with obesity underwent an open TAR. Twenty-seven patients (14.8%) underwent surgery with a BMI > 40; they did not have any significant differences in surgical site occurrences (SSO, 48.1% vs 32.9%, p = 0.13) or surgical site infections (SSI, 25.9% vs 23.2%, p = 0.76) compared to those with a BMI ≤ 40. The average timeframe analyzed for preoperative weight loss was 592 days. Patients who had at least a 3% weight loss (n = 49, 26.9%) had decreased rates of SSI compared to those who did not have this weight loss (12.2% vs 27.8%, p = 0.03), despite the groups having similar BMIs at the time of surgery (36.4 vs 36.0, p = 0.50). Patients who only had a 1% weight loss did not see a decrease in SSI rate compared to those who did not (20.6% vs 25.4%, p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Weight loss may be a better indicator of a patient's risk for wound morbidity following TAR than BMI alone, as weight loss of at least 3% resulted in fewer SSIs despite similar BMIs at time of surgery. Further research into optimal timing and amount of weight loss, as well as effects on long-term outcomes, is needed to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Trajetória do Peso do Corpo , Hérnia Ventral , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Resultado do Tratamento , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Músculos Abdominais/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/complicações , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Redução de Peso
19.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14524, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38084057

RESUMO

Operative site wound infection is one of the most frequent infections in surgery. A variety of studies have shown that the results of laparoscopy might be superior to those of an open procedure. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of clarity as to whether there is a difference between open and laparoscopy with respect to the occurrence of wound infections in different paediatric operations. In this review, we looked at randomized, controlled studies that directly measured the rate of wound infection following an appendectomy with a laparoscope. We looked up four main databases for randomized, controlled studies that compare the treatment of paediatric appendicitis with laparoscopy. The surgeries included appendectomy. Through our search, we have determined 323 related papers and selected five qualified ones to be analysed according to the eligibility criteria. Five trials were also assessed for the quality of the documents. In the 5 trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post-operative wound infection among the paediatric appendectomy and the open-access group (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-1.15, p = 0.13). The four trials did not show any statistically significant difference in abdominal abscesses among the laparoscopic and open-access treatment groups (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.90-3.01, p = 0.11). The four trials did not reveal any statistically significant difference in operating time (mean difference, -4.36; 95% CI, -17.31 to 8.59, p = 0.51). In light of these findings, the use of laparoscopy as compared with the open-approach approach in paediatric appendectomies is not associated with a reduction in the risk of wound infection.


Assuntos
Apendicite , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Criança , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
20.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14400, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37718121

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) can pose significant risks to patients undergoing surgical procedures. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for SSIs in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 866 patients at our hospital was conducted between June 2016 and June 2022. The study divided patients into two groups: those with SSIs and those without. General data and operative room-related information were collected. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly defined. Peripheral blood indicators were analysed, and observation indicators were meticulously selected, including surgery time, usage of a laminar flow operating room and intraoperative hypothermia. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software, including univariate, multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six out of 866 patients developed SSIs. Statistically significant differences were found for surgery time, usage of non-laminar flow operating rooms and intraoperative hypothermia (p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.765 (95% CI: 0.636-0.868) for serum NLR and PLR, with optimal cut-off values at NLR 4.8 and PLR 196, indicating moderate to strong discriminative ability for SSIs. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified non-laminar flow operating rooms, extended surgery time, and intraoperative hypothermia as significant risk factors for SSIs. Serum NLR and PLR were found valuable as biomarkers for SSIs diagnosis, holding potential for preoperative risk assessment and improved patient safety in renal cell carcinoma care.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Hipotermia , Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neutrófilos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Hipotermia/cirurgia , Contagem de Plaquetas , Linfócitos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA