Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be affected by food intake. We aimed to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole. SETTING: The study population comprised 186 healthy volunteers participating in 6 bioequivalence clinical trials. METHOD: Subjects were evaluated to determine the effect of a high-fat breakfast on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (n = 36), rabeprazole (n = 69), and pantoprazole (n = 81). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Drug plasma concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Food affected the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (increased Tmax and decreased AUC and Cmax), pantoprazole (increased Tmax and decreased AUC), and rabeprazole (increased Tmax, Cmax and half-life). Food increased variability in Tmax for all 3 drugs, delaying absorption around 3 to 4 h and until 20 h in some subjects. CONCLUSION: As food delays the absorption of PPIs and increases their variability, it would be better to administer these drugs under fasting conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT : 2004-003863-59 (registration date 05/MAR/2004), EudraCT 2006-001162-17 (registration date 17-MAR-2006), EudraCT: 2007-002489-37 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2007-002490-31 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2010-024029-19 (registration date 23-NOV-2010).

Qualitative and quantitative determination of anaprazole and its major metabolites in human plasma.

Anaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor under development for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers. In the present study, an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry method was developed for the metabolic profiling of human plasma after an oral administration of 40 mg anaprazole. The principal metabolic pathways were identified as sulfoxide reduction to thioether (M8-1), dehydrogenation (M21-1), sulfoxide oxidation to sulfone (M16-3), and sulfoxide reduction with O-demethylation to form carboxylic acid (M7-1). Anaprazole, M8-1, M16-3, M21-1, and M7-1 were selected and further quantified in human plasma by using a rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Anaprazole and its four metabolites were extracted from 50 of µL plasma by acetonitrile protein precipitation. Chromatographic retention and separation were achieved on an Kinetex XB-C18 column (50 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm) under gradient elution using 5 mM ammonium acetate with 0.005 % ammonium hydroxide and methanol with 0.005 % ammonium hydroxide as the mobile phase. Positive electrospray ionization was performed using multiple reaction monitoring with transitions of m/z 402.2→242.2, 386.2→226.2, 400.2→242.2, 418.2→282.2, and 386.2→161.2 for anaprazole, M8-1, M21-1, M16-3, and M7-1, respectively. This method was linear in the range of 5.00-3000 ng/mL for anaprazole and 1.00-600 ng/mL for the four metabolites. The lower limit of quantitation was established at 5.00 ng/mL for anaprazole and 1.00 ng/mL for the metabolites. The quantitative method was used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of anaprazole in phase I clinical trials.

Esomeprazole vs pantoprazole effects on cyclosporine levels in kidney transplantation: A randomized clinical trial.

Renal allograft survival requires multiple immunosuppressive drugs. This strategy may lead to gastric complications that necessitate gastro-protective medications, notably, proton pump inhibitors (PPI). This study aimed to compare the influence of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on serum cyclosporine trough levels (C0 ) in renal transplant recipients (RTR). A prospective, parallel, open-label trial was conducted on 47 adult RTR receiving cyclosporine doses adjusted to attain trough concentrations of 100 to 150 µg/L, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 750 mg q12 hour and prednisolone at 5 mg daily at Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt from January to September 2016. Patients were randomized into the esomeprazole group (25) or pantoprazole group (22) receiving the same dose (40 mg once daily). The study outcomes included clinical signs of rejection and renal function decline, assessed by elevations in serum creatinine, caused by cyclosporine level variations in either of the two study groups. Renal function, C0 and CBC measurements were measured at baseline and monthly for 6 months. The mean C0 values were higher in the pantoprazole group than in the esomeprazole group in the sixth month only (P = .007). Serum creatinine level was lower in the sixth month than at baseline in the esomeprazole group (P = .004). There were no signs of rejection biochemical or clinical in any of the study groups. In conclusion, PPIs should be used with caution and doses should be titrated to reach the C0 targets in RTR, which is of more importance in pantoprazole than esomeprazole to avoid C0 level elevation or decline affecting the allograft function.

Can Helicobacter pylori Colonization Affect the Phosphate Binder Pill Burden in Dialysis Patients?

Phosphate binder pill (PBP) burden is a significant problem in dialysis patients. Phosphate absorption through the paracellular pathway increases in relatively acidic pH. In this study, we evaluated the effect of factors contributing to duodenal pH-Helicobacter pylori (HP), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and NaHCO3 capsules-on PBP burden. We evaluated 255 dialysis patients with gastric biopsies and excluded patients with low Kt/V, gastrectomy, and parathyroidectomy. Patients were divided into groups and subgroups regarding HP existence, use of PPI, or NaHCO3 capsules. HP+ group had significantly higher PBP burden and PBP equivalent doses (P < 0.001; both). HP+ subgroup not using daily PPIs or NaHCO3 capsules had the highest PBP burden and PBP equivalent doses (P < 0.001; both). HP- subgroups had similar PBP and PBP equivalent doses (P = 0.446 and P = 0.382; respectively). HP colonization might affect the PBP burden in dialysis patients due to a decrease of duodenal pH.

A new strategy for extraction and depuration of pantoprazole in rat plasma: Vortex assisted dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction employing metal organic framework MIL-101(Cr) as sorbent followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of a floating organic droplet.

Dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction (DMSPE) combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of a floating organic droplet (DLLME-SFO) was successfully developed for extraction and depuration of pantoprazole in rat plasma. The remarkable metal organic framework (MOF), MIL-101(Cr) was used as DMSPE adsorbent. The detection of pantoprazole was performed by convenient HPLC-UV. In the extraction of pantoprazole from plasma samples, small molecule compounds, including the target and abundant impurities, were easily admitted into the porous structure of MIL-101 (Cr) material in DMSPE; while, macromolecular compounds were handily excluded from the adsorbent. Next, the depuration process was achieved by removal of small polar impurities in DLLME-SFO. Influential factors were systematically optimized for ideal enrichment and depuration efficiency. Under the optimal conditions, a satisfactory linearity range from the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ, 100 ng/L) to 10 000 ng/L with the correlation coefficients (r) of 0.9934 was obtained. The LLOQ was 100 ng/mL and the relative recoveries were ≧ 73.2 ±â€¯4.8%. The approving reproducibility, acceptable accuracy, and stability were all within the acceptance limits. This proposed method presented the advantages of environment-friendly, low-cost, recyclable, low impurity, and preferable applicability. It could offer a new idea for the pretreatment and pharmacokinetic study of pantoprazole in rat plasma.

Influence of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Esomeprazole on the Bioavailability of Regorafenib: A Randomized Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study.

Regorafenib exposure could potentially be influenced by an interaction with acid-reducing drugs. In this crossover trial, patients were randomized into two sequence groups consisting of three phases: regorafenib intake alone, regorafenib with concomitant esomeprazole, and regorafenib with esomeprazole 3 hours prior. The primary end point was the relative difference (RD) in geometric means for regorafenib 0-24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h ) and was analyzed by a linear mixed model in 14 patients. AUC0-24h for regorafenib alone was 55.9 µg·hour/mL (coefficient of variance (CV): 40%), and for regorafenib with concomitant esomeprazole or with esomeprazole 3 hours prior AUC0-24h was 53.7 µg·hour/mL (CV: 34%) and 53.6 µg·hour/mL (CV: 43%), respectively. No significant differences were identified when regorafenib alone was compared with regorafenib with concomitant esomeprazole (RD: -3.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -20.5 to 16.1%; P = 1.0) or regorafenib with esomeprazole 3 hours prior (RD: -4.1%; 95% CI: -22.8 to 19.2%; P = 1.0). These findings indicate that regorafenib and esomeprazole can be safely combined in clinical practice.

The pH-altering agent omeprazole affects rate but not the extent of ibrutinib exposure.

PURPOSE: This drug-interaction study evaluated the effect of omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, on ibrutinib's pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy participants. METHODS: This open-label, sequential-design study included 20 healthy adults aged 18-55 years. Ibrutinib (560 mg, single dose) was administered after an overnight fast alone on day 1 and with omeprazole on day 7. Omeprazole (40 mg) alone was administered on days 3-6, 1 h before breakfast; and after an overnight fast on day 7, followed by ibrutinib 2 h later. Blood was sampled on days 1 and 7 for up to 48 h postdose, and the standard PK parameters for ibrutinib and PCI-45227 were summarized using descriptive statistics. The effect of omeprazole on ibrutinib's PK was determined by assessing geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs. Mechanistic modeling was performed using the BTK-receptor occupancy (RO) model. RESULTS: AUC48h and AUClast of ibrutinib plus omeprazole versus ibrutinib alone showed a modest decrease (GMR [90% CI] 98.3% [83.1-116.3] and 92.5% [77.8-109.9], respectively); Cmax decreased by 62.5% (GMR [90% CI] 37.5% [26.4-53.4]), with delayed tmax (1-2 h) and terminal half-life unaffected. Mean AUC for PCI-45227 (primary metabolite) was ~ 20% lower with ibrutinib plus omeprazole versus ibrutinib alone. Model predictions showed no impact of decreased Cmax on BTK target engagement. No new safety signals were identified with the use of ibrutinib in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in Cmax without a corresponding decrease in AUC by omeprazole was not clinically relevant for ibrutinib's bioavailability. No dose adjustments are recommended during ibrutinib's co-administration with omeprazole or other pH-altering agents.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and safety after coadministration of clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and ilaprazole: a randomised, open-label, one-way crossover, two parallel sequences study.

PURPOSE: Ilaprazole, the latest proton pump inhibitor, can be used with clarithromycin and amoxicillin as a triple therapy regimen for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic drug interactions and safety profiles after coadministration of clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and ilaprazole. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, one-way crossover, two parallel sequences study was conducted in 32 healthy subjects. In part 1, the subjects received a single dose of ilaprazole 10 mg in period 1 and clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 6 days in period 2. In part 2, the subjects received clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg once in period 1 and ilaprazole 10 mg twice daily for 6 days in period 2. In both sequences, the three drugs were coadministrated once on day 5 in period 2. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of ilaprazole (part 1), and clarithromycin and amoxicillin (part 2) were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects completed the study. For ilaprazole, the peak concentration (Cmax) slightly decreased from 479 (ilaprazole alone) to 446 ng/mL (triple therapy) [Geometric least square mean ratio (90% confidence interval), 0.93 (0.70-1.22)]. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to the last measurable concentration (AUClast) slightly increased from 3301 to 3538 µg·h/mL [1.07 (0.85-1.35)]. For clarithromycin, the Cmax slightly decreased from 1.87 to 1.72 µg/mL [0.90 (0.70-1.15)], and AUClast slightly increased from 14.6 to 16.5 µg·h/mL [1.09 (0.87-1.37)]. For amoxicillin, the Cmax slightly decreased from 9.37 to 8.14 µg/mL [0.86 (0.74-1.01)], and AUClast slightly decreased from 27.9 to 26.7 µg·h/mL [0.98 (0.83-1.16)]. These changes in the PK parameters of each drug were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of ilaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin was tolerable and did not cause a significant PK drug interaction. Thus, a triple therapy regimen comprising ilaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin may be an option for the eradication of H. pylori. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02998437.

Evaluation of a Hollow-Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction Technique for the Simultaneous Determination of PPI Drugs in Human Plasma by LC-DAD.

This study involved the development, validation and application of a three-phase hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and liquid chromatography with diode array detection (LC-DAD) method for the simultaneous determination of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs omeprazole, pantoprazole and lansoprazole in human plasma. The evaluation of the HF-LPME parameters was crucial for the determination of the drugs and the conditions selected were: 1-octanol as solvent; phosphate buffer at pH 5 as donor phase; borate buffer at pH 10 as acceptor phase; extraction time of 15 min; stirring at 750 rpm and NaCl was added at 5% (w/v). Validation of the method according to US-FDA recommendations showed a good linear range (0.2-2.0 µg/mL) for all analytes, with a determination coefficient >0.9910. Precision was evaluated using intra- and inter-day assays, which showed relative standard deviations (RSD), <15% for all concentrations, with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.2 µg/mL. Accuracy was also assessed at these concentration levels and was in the range from 80 to 130%. Finally, the sensitive, selective and reproducible HF-LPME/LC-DAD developed method was successfully applied to human plasma samples from patients undergoing therapy with the PPI drugs.

LC-MS/MS bioassay of four proton pump inhibitors.

A new validated bio-analytical LC-MS/MS method was developed for the simultaneous extraction and determination of four proton pump inhibitors: esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole in human plasma using escitalopram as an internal standard. The proteins in plasma samples were precipitated using acetonitrile for the extraction of analytes which is a simple economic method. The separation was accomplished using a mobile phase composed of 10 mM ammonium formate: acetonitrile: methanol (20:40:40% v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min in isocratic mode on a reversed phase C18 INERTSIL ODS-3 (5 µm, 150 × 4.6 mm) and column temperature of 40 °C. Positive mode electrospray ionization source was used prior to multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) detection using parent and daughter ions: m/z 346.2 → 198.1 for esomeprazole, m/z 370.1 → 252 for lansoprazole, m/z 384.2 → 200.2 for pantoprazole, m/z 360.1 → 242.1 for rabeprazole and m/z 325.2 → 109 for escitalopram. The calibration curves were constructed, and the method was linear in the range of 20-5000 ng/mL applying weighted (1/X2) linear regression coefficient for all drugs. The method was fully validated following US-FDA and EMA guidelines.

Disposition kinetics of omeprazole in healthy female volunteers in Faisalabad.

Omeprazole (OMP) a proton pump inhibitor is widely used to suppress gastric acid secretions of parietal cells of stomach and metabolized predominantly by CYP2C19. The objective of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and dosage regimen of OMP, after its single oral administration in eight healthy adult female subjects. Blood samples were collected at different time intervals after oral administration and their pH was measured. Plasma concentration of OMP was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with UV-visible Detector. The concentration versus time data was used to compute the pharmacokinetic parameters with the help of computer software programme MW/PHRAM APO version 3.02.Peak plasma concentration was (Cmax) 0.38±0.04 µg/ml achieved at 2.07±0.22 hrs. The elimination half-life (t1/2 ß) was1.82 ± 0.42 hrs. Volume of distribution (Vd) in the present study was 0.40 ± 0.07 l/kg with total body clearance (ClB) 0.19 ± 0.02 l/hr/kg and area under the curve (AUC) 1.89 ± 0.23 µg.hr/ml.The pharmacokinetic properties which are different from the literature after oral administration of 20 mg OMP in eight healthy female volunteers may be due to the variations of environment and genetic variation between Pakistan and drug manufacturing of foreign countries.

Assessing the bioequivalence of over-the-counter esomeprazole banded capsules and multiple-unit pellet system tablets
.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate bioequivalence between two esomeprazole formulations under fasted and fed conditions. MATERIALS: Esomeprazole 20 mg multiunit pellet system (test; MUPS) tablets and over-the-counter esomeprazole 20 mg banded capsules (reference). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, randomized, 6-period crossover study assigned healthy males and females to receive single doses of each study drug under fasted or fed conditions. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were esomeprazole area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax). For endpoints with high within-subject standard deviations of the reference product (Swr ≥ 0.294), a reference scaled average bioequivalence (RSAB) approach was used. For endpoints not highly variable (Swr < 0.294), an unscaled approach was used. In the RSAB, bioequivalence was defined as the 95% criteria bound (CB) ≤ 0 and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) within 0.80, 1.25. For the unscaled approach, bioequivalence was defined as 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the GMR being within 80%, 125%. RESULTS: 60 subjects were randomized, and 46 subjects (76.7%) completed all study periods. For esomeprazole AUCinf, the variability of the reference product was low (Swr = 0.202), so the unscaled approach was used. The GMR (90% CI) was 0.948 (0.890 - 1.010), indicating bioequivalence. For the comparison of esomeprazole Cmax, the variability of the reference product was high (Swr = 0.304), so the RSAB approach was used. The GMR (95% CB) was 1.009 (-0.050), indicating bioequivalence. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 20 mg MUPS tablets and banded capsules were found to be bioequivalent based on the AUCinf and Cmax in the fasted state.
.

Developmental pharmacogenetics of CYP2C19 in neonates and young infants: omeprazole as a probe drug.

AIMS: Although substantial progress has been made in understanding of ontogeny of drug metabolism, there is still a gap of knowledge in developmental pharmacogenetics in neonates. We hypothesized that both age and pharmacogenetics might explain the developmental pattern of CYP2C19. We conducted a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic study to quantify the developmental pharmacogenetics of CYP2C19 in neonates and young infants using omeprazole as a probe drug. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic samples were collected from 51 Caucasian neonates and young infants, who were receiving omeprazole treatment. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic analysis of omeprazole and its metabolites was performed using NONMEM. RESULTS: Data fitted a one-compartment parent and metabolite model with first-order absorption and elimination. CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 are predominantly involved in the metabolism of omeprazole despite their relatively low activities compared to adults. The clearance of omeprazole converted to 5-hydroxy-omeprazole (CLOMZ-M1 ) increases with postnatal age. In CYP2C19 poor and intermediate metabolizers, model-predicted CLOMZ-M1 are 12.5% (5-95% percentile: 3-14.9%) and 44.9% (5-95% percentile: 29.9-72.6%) of the value in extensive/ultrarapid metabolizer, respectively. Model-predicted absorption rate constant of omeprazole is 6.93 (5-95% percentile: 3.01-14.61) times higher in ABCB1 homozygous mutant patients, 1.86 (5-95% percentile: 0.86-3.47) times higher in ABCB1 heterozygous patients than that in ABCB1 homozygous wild-type patients. CONCLUSIONS: Developmental pharmacogenetics of CYP2C19 was quantitatively described in neonates and young infants using omeprazole as a probe drug. Our findings emphasize the importance of semiphysiological developmental pharmacokinetic modelling approach when evaluating developmental pharmacogenetics of drugs with multiple routes of biotransformation.

Clopidogrel in Critically Ill Patients.

Only limited data are available regarding the treatment of critically ill patients with clopidogrel. This trial investigated the effects and the drug concentrations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) activated prodrug clopidogrel (n = 43) and the half-life of the similarly metabolized pantoprazole (n = 16) in critically ill patients. ADP-induced aggregometry in whole blood classified 74% (95% confidence intervals 59-87%) of critically ill patients as poor responders (n = 43), and 65% (49-79%) responded poorly according to the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay. Although the plasma levels of clopidogrel active metabolite normally exceed the inactive prodrug ∼30-fold, the parent drug levels even exceeded those of the metabolite 2-fold in critically ill patients. The half-life of pantoprazole was several-fold longer in these patients compared with reference populations. The inverse ratio of prodrug/active metabolite indicates insufficient metabolization of clopidogrel, which is independently confirmed by the ∼5-fold increase in half-life of pantoprazole. Thus, high-risk patients may benefit from treatment with alternative platelet inhibitors.

Comparison of a revaprazan-loaded solid dispersion, solid SNEDDS and inclusion compound: Physicochemical characterisation and pharmacokinetics.

The aim of this research was to compare three strategies for enhancing the solubility of poorly water-soluble revaprazan hydrochloride: solid dispersion, solid SNEDDS and inclusion compound. The influence of polymers, surfactants and oils on the drug solubility was assessed, and via the chosen carriers, the three types of formulations were prepared utilising spray drying technique. Their physicochemical properties, solubility, dissolution and pharmacokinetics in rats were performed compared with revaprazan powder. Among the liquid SNEDDS formulations assessed, the compositions of revaprazan, peceol, Tween 80 and Labrasol (10:15:55:30, weight ratio) provided the smallest emulsion size. Moreover, this liquid SNEDDS and dextran were suspended/dissolved in distilled water, and spray-dried, producing an optimal revaprazan-loaded solid SNEDDS. The appropriate solid dispersion and inclusion compound were composed of revaprazan, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and cremophor A25 (5:1.4:5.6) and drug and hydroxyl-ß-cyclodextrin (2.5:8.77), respectively. The crystalline drug was converted to an amorphous state in all formulations. In the solid dispersion, the drug was attached to the hydrophilic carrier. The solid SNEDDS and inclusion compound contained aggregate microspheres and separate microspheres, respectively. All formulations significantly increased the drug solubility, dissolution, plasma concentration and AUC compared with revaprazan powder. These properties were ranked in the order solid dispersion ≥ solid SNEDDS > inclusion compound. Particularly, the solid dispersion improved about 9500-fold drug solubility and 10-fold oral bioavailability. Thus, the improved properties were considerably dependent upon these techniques, although all of the techniques employed similar mechanisms. Among the strategies checked, the solid dispersion system would be recommended as an oral revaprazan-loaded pharmaceutical product.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Azeloprazole Sodium, a Novel Proton Pump Inhibitor, in Healthy Japanese Volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of proton pump inhibitors differ among cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes. Therefore, we developed azeloprazole sodium (Z-215), a novel proton pump inhibitor, whose metabolism is not affected by CYP2C19 activity in vitro. However, the PK and PD of azeloprazole sodium have not been evaluated in Japanese subjects. We conducted an open-label, crossover study in healthy Japanese male volunteers to evaluate the plasma concentration and intragastric pH with respect to CYP2C19 genotype after repeated administration of 10, 20, and 40 mg azeloprazole sodium and 10 and 20 mg rabeprazole sodium (rabeprazole). The plasma concentration profile of azeloprazole sodium was similar among genotypes, whereas that of rabeprazole differed. The 24-hour intragastric pH ≥ 4 holding time ratio (pH ≥ 4 HTR) of azeloprazole sodium was similar among genotypes. The pH ≥ 4 HTR was 52.5%-60.3%, 55.1%-65.8%, and 69.4%-77.1% after administration of 10, 20, and 40 mg azeloprazole sodium, respectively, and 59.2%-72.3% and 64.4%-91.2% after administration of 10 and 20 mg rabeprazole, respectively, on the fifth day of dosing. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), and pH ≥ 4 HTR of azeloprazole sodium were proportional to dose. The Cmax , AUC, and pH ≥ 4 HTR on day 5 were slightly higher following administration of 20 mg azeloprazole sodium before comparison with after a meal. No serious adverse events were observed. These results suggest that azeloprazole sodium is useful for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease in all CYP2C19 genotypes.

Renal clearance and urinary excretion of omeprazole in healthy female volunteers in Pakistan.

Omeprazole is a widely prescribed proton pump inhibitor to treat various gastric acid hyper secretion disorders. The present study was designed to evaluate the renal clearance and urinary excretion of omeprazole in eight healthy female volunteers to increase the understanding of the contributing factors such as demographics variability in the renal clearance and urinary excretion of omeprazole under indigenous conditions. The urine and blood samples were collected 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours after oral administration of enteric coated omeprazole (20 mg) and drug concentration in the samples was determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with C18 column and UV detector. Urinary excretion and renal clearance of omeprazole was calculated and data was statistically analyzed by using regression/correlation technique. Endogenous creatinine was also measured by reagent kit available in the market. The results indicate that mean diuresis was 0.0172±0.0029 ml/min/kg. While the mean values of renal clearance of creatinine and omeprazole were 1.315±0.103 and 0.066±0.0042 ml/min. kg, respectively. Whereas, clearance ratio was 0.055±0.007 which indicates back diffusion. The cumulative percentage of dose excreted was 6.71±0.358. A significant (p<0.05) negative correlation (r= -0.457) between clearance ratio and urine pH of omeprazole reflecting glomerular filtration reabsorption of drug at kidney tubular level while significant (p<0.05) negative correlation (r= -0.681) between clearance ratio and plasma concentration of omeprazole indicates the involvement of active tubular secretion of drug. It can be concluded that during glomerular filtration, omeprazole diffuse back/reabsorption. Therefore, Urinary excretion of omeprazole in indigenous healthy female subjects was observed to be lower than given in the literature values.

Proton Pump Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease: Drug Interactions with Antiplatelet Drugs.

Aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases. Upper gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed.PPIs provide gastroprotection by changing the intragastric milieu, essentially by raising intragastric pH. In recent years, it has been heavily discussed whether PPIs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction between PPIs and clopidogrel, and subsequent clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the clinical impact of this interaction. More recently, it was reported that PPIs may also attenuate the antiplatelet effect of aspirin. This may be clinically important, because a fixed combination of aspirin and a PPI (esomeprazole) has recently been approved and because aspirin is the most widely used drug in patients with cardiovascular disease. The antiplatelet effect of the new P2Y12 receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, seems less influenced by PPI co-treatment.Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition potentially carries considerable clinical impact. The present book chapter summarizes the evidence regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines current evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses clinical implications.

Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and MDR1 Transporter on Pantoprazole Metabolism and Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that is commonly used in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Pantoprazole is a substrate for multi-drug resistance protein 1 (MDR1). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and MDR1 affect enzyme activity or gene expression of proteins and may alter plasma pantoprazole concentrations and treatment success in PUD. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and MDR1 and pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole and therapeutic outcome in patients with either Helicobacter pylori-associated [H.P.(+)]-PUD or [H.P.(+)]-gastritis. The plasma pantoprazole concentrations were determined by using an HPLC method at the third hour after a 40-mg tablet of pantoprazole administration in 194 newly diagnosed patients with either [H.P.(+)]-PUD or [H.P.(+)]-gastritis. Genotyping was performed by using PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing. Among patients appearing for follow-up examination (n = 105), the eradication rate for H. pylori was 82.8% (n = 87). The median pantoprazole plasma concentrations in poor metabolizers (PM), rapid metabolizers (RM) and ultrarapid metabolizers (URM) were 2.07, 1.69 and 1.28 µg/ml, respectively (p = 0.04). CYP3A4*1G and *22 polymorphisms did not affect plasma pantoprazole concentrations and H. pylori eradication rate. The MDR1 genetic polymorphisms did not affect plasma pantoprazole concentrations. MDR1 3435CC-2677GG-1236CC haplotype carriers had lower H. pylori eradication rate (60%) than the remaining subjects (84.9%) while the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). In conclusion, while CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms significantly affected plasma pantoprazole concentrations, polymorphisms of CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and MDR1 did not affect H. pylori eradication rates.

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF FAST REVERSED-PHASE HPLC METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF ESOMEPRAZOLE IN RABBIT PLASMA.

The present study focused to develop rapid, accurate and sensitive reversed-phase high pressure liquid chromatography method for the quantification of esomeprazole (ESO) magnesium in rabbit plasma. Chromatographic separation was achieved isocratically on a reversed-phase C,, column using simple mobile phase consisting of of methanol : acetonitrile: 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7 adjusted with potassium hydroxide (45 : 10 : 45, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and UV detection at 302 nm. The method was validated for system suitability, linearity, precision, accuracy, stability, robustness, LOD and LOQ. The described method stated good linearity over the range of 0.01 to 2.5 pg/mL (r = 0.999). The extraction recovery of esomeprazole was more than 95.3%. The method was precise with relative standard deviation < 1% with more than 90% accuracy and limit of quantification 0.0309 µg/mL. The freeze thaw stability studies indicated that the rabbit plasma samples containing esomeprazole could be stored in freezer at -20°C and handled under normal laboratory conditions without significant loss of drug. In conclusion, the developed method is simple, cost effective and reproducible, with improved sensitivity and running time of analysis.