Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing Using Anti-Factor Xa Levels in Hepatic Surgery Patients: A Pilot Study.

This study examines the safety and efficacy of using peak anti-Xa levels to achieve prophylactic enoxaparin (Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) levels in patients who underwent hepatic surgery. Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing major and minor hepatic procedures received postoperative enoxaparin dosing. The enoxaparin dose was adjusted to attain a peak anti-Xa level ≥ 0.20 U/ml. This group was compared to a historical cohort of patients who underwent similar procedures and received standard postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis dosing. Inpatient postoperative VTE rates were higher in the control group when compared to the experimental group (0 patients [0.00%] vs 4 patients [8.16%]; P = .035). There was no statistically significant difference in number of postoperative blood transfusions, discharge hemoglobin, or in-hospital bleeding events. Adjusting enoxaparin dosing to achieve prophylactic peak anti-Xa levels of ≥0.20 IU/ml was associated with a reduced incidence of symptomatic inpatient postoperative VTE in patients who underwent hepatic surgery without increasing postoperative bleeding events.

Anti-factor Xa level monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients (AXaLPE): protocol of a randomised, open-label controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Whether and when to monitor the amount of anti-factor Xa (aFXa) activity in critically ill patients with complex diseases to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain unclear. This study is a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of aFXa level monitoring on reducing VTE and to establish a new method for accurately preventing VTE in critically ill patients with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled trial is planned in two centres with a planned sample size of 858 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups receiving LMWH prophylaxis at a 1:1:1 ratio: in group A, peak aFXa levels will serve as the guide for the LMWH dose; in group B, the trough aFXa levels will serve as the guide for the LMWH dose; and in group C, participants serving as the control group will receive a fixed dose of LMWH. The peak and trough aFXa levels will be monitored after LMWH (enoxaparin, 40 mg, once daily) reaches a steady state for at least 3 days. The monitoring range for group A's aFXa peak value will be 0.3-0.5 IU/mL, between 0.1 and 0.2 IU/mL is the target range for group B's aFXa trough value. In order to reach the peak or trough aFXa levels, groups A and B will be modified in accordance with the monitoring peak and trough aFXa level. The incidence of VTE will serve as the study's primary outcome indicator. An analysis using the intention-to-treat and per-protocol criterion will serve as the main outcome measurement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Xuanwu Hospital Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University and Peking University First Hospital Ethics Committee have approved this investigation. It will be released in all available worldwide, open-access, peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05382481.

Enoxaparin titrated by anti-Xa levels reduces venous thromboembolism in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a major risk factor for the development of a venous thromboembolism (VTE). After observing higher than expected VTE rates within our center's Trauma Quality Improvement Program data, we instituted a change in our VTE prophylaxis protocol, moving to enoxaparin dosing titrated by anti-Xa levels. We hypothesized that this intervention would lower our symptomatic VTE rates. METHODS: Adult trauma patients at a single institution meeting National Trauma Data Standard criteria from April 2015 to September 2019 were examined with regards to VTE chemoprophylaxis regimen and VTE incidence. Two groups of patients were identified based on VTE protocol-those who received enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily without routine anti-Xa levels ("pre") versus those who received enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily with dose titrated by serial anti-Xa levels ("post"). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define statistically significant differences in VTE incidence between the two cohorts. RESULTS: There were 1698 patients within the "pre" group and 1406 patients within the "post" group. The two groups were essentially the same in terms of demographics and risk factors for bleeding or thrombosis. There was a statistically significant reduction in VTE rate (p = 0.01) and deep vein thrombosis rate (p = 0.01) but no significant reduction in pulmonary embolism rate (p = 0.21) after implementation of the anti-Xa titration protocol. Risk-adjusted Trauma Quality Improvement Program data showed an improvement in rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism from fifth decile to first decile. CONCLUSION: A protocol titrating prophylactic enoxaparin dose based on anti-Xa levels reduced VTE rates. Implementation of this type of protocol requires diligence from the physician and pharmacist team. Further research will investigate the impact of protocol compliance and time to appropriate anti-Xa level on incidence of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.

Supraprophylactic Anti-Factor Xa Levels Are Associated with Major Bleeding in Neurosurgery Patients Receiving Prophylactic Enoxaparin.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrated reduced risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in neurosurgical patients secondary to prophylaxis with both heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. The ability to monitor low-molecular-weight heparin by obtaining anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) serum levels provides an opportunity to evaluate safety and efficacy. The aim of this study was to describe characteristics of patients who have anti-Xa levels outside of the goal range (0.2-0.4/0.5 IU/mL) and investigate incidence of major bleeding and VTE. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted on neurosurgical patients receiving enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis between August 2019 and December 2020. Significance testing was conducted via Fisher exact test and independent samples t test. RESULTS: The study included 85 patients. Patients were less likely to have an anti-Xa level in the goal range if they were male, had a higher weight, or were morbidly obese. Three neuroendovascular patients (3.5%) experienced a major bleed. Serum anti-Xa levels were significantly higher in patients who experienced major bleeds compared with patients who did not (0.45 ± 0.16 IU/mL vs. 0.28 ± 0.09 IU/mL, P = 0.003). Patients with a supraprophylactic anti-Xa level (>0.5 IU/mL) were more likely to experience a major bleed (P = 0.005). One VTE event occurred: the patient experienced a pulmonary embolism with anti-Xa level at goal. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dosing for VTE prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients may help prevent major bleeding. These data suggest that a higher anti-Xa level may predispose patients to major bleeding. Further evaluation is needed to identify the goal anti-Xa level for VTE prophylaxis in this population.

Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Following Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vary in bioavailability and sites of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Data on DOAC use after major GIT surgery are limited. The aim of this case series was to report the impact of surgical resection or bypass of the GIT on rivaroxaban and apixaban peak plasma concentrations. This was a case series of patients who received rivaroxaban or apixaban after GIT surgery, during the period of July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban were assessed for the expected concentrations. Of the 27 assessed patients, 18 (66.7%) received rivaroxaban, and 9 (33.3%) received apixaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who underwent gastrectomy, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) who underwent duodenum and proximal jejunum exclusion had peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban lower than the effective range, whereas 11 of 11 patients (100%) who underwent distal bowel or ileostomy had peak rivaroxaban plasma within the effective range. After apixaban therapy, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) who underwent total or partial gastrectomy achieved effective peak concentrations. All the patients who underwent proximal and distal bowel resection or bypass had peak concentrations of apixaban within the effective range. In conclusion, surgical resection or bypass of the upper GIT could affect DOAC absorption and subsequently peak plasma concentrations. This effect was more observed among rivaroxaban recipients. An injectable anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist may be preferred if DOAC concentrations cannot be measured after GIT surgery.

Assessment of exposure to direct oral anticoagulants in elderly hospitalised patients.

It is unclear whether elderly patients established on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have greater exposure to these drugs, which could subsequently increase their risk of bleeding. We assessed DOAC exposure and factors affecting it in a real-world elderly cohort of patients. For this, 151 medically stable hospital inpatients (76 established on apixaban, 61 on rivaroxaban, 14 on dabigatran) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 84 (78-89) years were recruited. Patients provided blood samples for measurement of peak and trough plasma DOAC concentrations. There was up to 48-fold and 13-fold variation in trough and peak plasma drug concentrations respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients on apixaban had peak plasma drug concentrations within the reported ranges compared to those on either rivaroxaban or dabigatran (82·9% vs. 44·3% vs. 64·3% respectively; P < 0·001). A third of the variability in DOAC plasma concentrations was attributed to the influences of DOAC dosage, renal function and gender. To what extent the observed increases in DOAC exposure in the older patients is the cause of their increased risk of bleeding, which could potentially be ameliorated by dosing titration, requires further investigation.

Effect of low-molecular-weight heparins on anti-Xa peak levels and adverse reactions in Chinese patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion: a single-center, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare three commonly used low-molecular-weight heparins (LWMHs) in the treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) by evaluating the anti-Xa peak levels and adverse reactions. METHODS: In this single-center, observational study, we enrolled 310 patients with RSA in whom anti-Xa levels were measured during pregnancy. Patients were divided into three groups according to the LMWH they used: the nadroparin group, enoxaparin group and dalteparin group. We compared the peak anti-Xa levels and the coagulation status of each group, and analyzed the incidence of adverse reactions, including local allergy, liver and renal dysfunction, and the impact on platelet. RESULTS: Patients in the enoxaparin group had a higher anti-Xa peak level than those in the nadroparin group (0.80 ± 0.22 IU/ml vs. 0.61 ± 0.24 IU/ml; P <  0.0001), although most patients in the three groups reached the target concentration of anti-Xa. Furthermore, patients in the enoxaparin group had a more stable anti-Xa levels during pregnancy. In addition, patients in the nadroparin group had a higher rate of local allergy than those in the enoxaparin group (60.5% vs. 42.5%; P = 0.004) and those in the dalteparin group (60.5% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.002). Further examination by the type of local allergy indicated a dramatic difference in pruritus and induration between the nadroparin group and the other two groups. No difference was found in the incidence of liver and renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Compared with nadroparin and daltepatin, enoxaparin showed a better performance regarding anti-Xa levels and the incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment of RSA.

A validated UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of CX3002 in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.

A simple, selective, rapid, and reliable ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine CX3002 in human plasma using CX3002-d3 as the internal standard (IS). After a rapid protein precipitation with acetonitrile (3:1, v/v), the chromatographic separation of CX3002 and IS was performed on a Thermo Hypersil GOLD C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.9 µm) with gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Gradient elution was achieved with mobile phase A consisting of water containing 0.1% formic acid and 5 mmol/L ammonium formate and mobile phase B consisting of methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The detection was performed on AB SCIEX QTRAP® 5500 tandem mass spectrometry in the positive ion mode. Multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) was used for quantitative analysis at transition of m/z 460.3 â†’ 199.3 for CX3002 and m/z 463.3 â†’ 202.3 m/z for IS. The method was fully validated and displayed good linearity over a concentration range of 0.2-400 ng/mL with the correlation coefficient above 0.997. The intra-run and inter-run precision (coefficient of variation, CV) ranged from 0.60%-16.46% and the accuracy bias ranged from -7.09%-9.75%. The mean IS-normalized extraction recovery ranged from 98.30% to 104.52%. The CV(%) of IS-normalized matrix factors at the low and high QC concentration were 4.09% and 1.68%, respectively. The storage stability under different conditions was in accordance with the bioanalytical guidelines. The method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of CX3002 (30 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Plasma Levels in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at the Time of Bleeding: A Pilot Prospective Study.

ABSTRACT: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications.

Applying index of circulating anticoagulant to mixing tests with lupus anticoagulant screen and confirm reagents can distinguish with high specificity between lupus anticoagulants and direct factor Xa inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are detected by prolongation of clotting times for dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) screening tests. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can interfere with both screening and confirmatory tests. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of direct factor Xa inhibitors (DiXaIs) on screen, confirm and mixing tests and establish a method for differentiation from other sample types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 257 samples including nonanticoagulated LA positive, LA positive with DiXaIs, factor deficiency, FVIII inhibitors, warfarin and non-APS DiXaIs were tested. APTT reagents Cephen LS/Cephen and dRVVT reagents LA1/LA2 were used, respectively, to screen/confirm the study group. Index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) was calculated from clotting times based on the following formula as ICA screening and ICA confirmation. ICA= (1:1 Mix sample - Normal pooled plasma) / Screen patient x 100. An ICA matrix was established which suggested the presence of a DiXaI when both ICA screening and confirmation were above the cut-off. When only ICA screening is elevated, LA is suspected. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the ICA matrix were 52.2% and 92.8% for DiXaIs and 38.1% and 96.7% for LA in APTT, and 61.2% and 92.9% for DiXaIs and 22.2% and 88.4% for LA in dRVVT, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ICA matrix achieved high specificity with a lower apparent sensitivity for DiXaI samples comparatively to other devices but due only to less interferences: the matrix could contribute to differentiating DiXaIs from LA in samples where anticoagulation status is unknown.

A universal anti-Xa assay for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban measurements: method validation, diagnostic accuracy and external validation.

A universal anti-Xa assay for the determination of rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban drug concentrations would simplify laboratory procedures and facilitate widespread implementation. Following two pilot studies analysing spiked samples and material from 698 patients, we conducted a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study, including 867 patients treated with rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban in clinical practice to comprehensively evaluate a simple, readily available anti-Xa assay that would accurately measure drug concentrations and correctly predict relevant levels in clinical practice. Anti-Xa activity was measured by an assay calibrated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in addition to ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). As an external validation, LMWH-calibrated anti-Xa activity was also determined in nine external laboratories. The LMWH-calibrated anti-Xa activity correlated strongly with rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban drug levels [rs  = 0·98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·98-0·98]. The sensitivity for the clinically relevant cut-off levels of 30, 50 and 100 µg/l was 96·2% (95% CI 94·4-97·4), 96·4% (95% CI 94·4-97·7) and 96·7% (95% CI 94·3-98·1) respectively. Concordant results were obtained in the external validation study. In conclusion, a universal, LMWH-calibrated anti-Xa assay accurately measured rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban concentrations and correctly predicted relevant drug concentrations in clinical practice.

Impact of Weight on Anti-Xa Attainment in High-Risk Trauma Patients on Enoxaparin Chemoprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Serum anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) concentration may guide low molecular weight heparin chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients. Higher total body weight (TBW) is a risk factor for subprophylactic anti-Xa and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate TBW differences in patients with subprophylactic versus prophylactic trough anti-Xa. METHODS: This retrospective study included adults admitted to the trauma service who received enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis, trough anti-Xa assessment, and screening duplex ultrasound. Initial enoxaparin dose was determined per trauma team weight-tiered protocol with subsequent 10 mg increase if anti-Xa was subprophylactic. Patients were stratified into subprophylactic (anti-Xa <0.1 IU/ml) and prophylactic (anti-Xa ≥0.1 IU/mL) groups. The primary outcome was difference in TBW. Secondary outcomes were weight-adjusted enoxaparin dose (mg/kg), VTE, red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions. RESULTS: A total of 887 patients were included with 681 (76.8%) having subprophylactic anti-Xa. The subprophylactic group had significantly younger age, higher proportion male sex, higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), higher BMI, and longer length of hospital stay. The subprophylactic group had higher TBW (median [IQR], 87.8 [74-102] kg vs. 78.9 [68-91.8] kg; P < 0.001) which equated to a lower weight-adjusted dose (0.34 [0.3-0.41] mg/kg vs. 0.38 (0.33-0.44) mg/kg; P < 0.001). There were no differences in VTE (10.4% vs. 9.2%; P = 0.71) or pRBC administration (17.0% vs. 16.0%; P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: TBW is higher and weight-adjusted enoxaparin dose is lower in high-risk trauma patients with subprophylactic anti-Xa concentrations. These data suggest TBW should be considered when determining the optimal prophylactic enoxaparin dose in high-risk trauma patients.

A Weight- and Anti-Xa-Guided Enoxaparin Dosing Protocol for venous thromboembolism Prophylaxis in intensive care unit Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the optimal dosing strategy for prophylactic enoxaparin remains unknown. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate a weight-based and anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dosing protocol in intensive care unit (ICU) trauma patients and to determine if the protocol led to reduced clinical VTE rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted for ≥ 48 hours to our surgical or neurosurgical ICUs who received ≥ 3 consecutive weight-based enoxaparin doses were eligible for inclusion into this pre-post implementation cohort study. Enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours was used for weight 50 to 100 kg and body mass index (BMI) < 40 kg/m2 and enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours for weight ≥ 100 kg or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. PRE cohort patients did not routinely receive anti-Xa level monitoring, while in the POST cohort, dosing was subsequently titrated to peak anti-Xa levels of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL. RESULTS: A total of 110 and 113 patients were included in the PRE and POST cohorts, respectively. Clinical VTE rates were similar between groups. In the POST cohort, 75% of patients achieved goal anti-Xa levels without dose titrations, while 12% of higher weight patients and 9.1% of lower weight patients required adjustment. When comparing weight quartiles, patients > 100 kg were more likely to have sub-prophylactic anti-Xa levels than those ≤ 69 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Our enoxaparin dosing protocol was safe and frequently achieved initial anti-Xa levels within goal, indicating that weight-based dosing alone may be sufficient. However, patients > 100 kg may benefit from anti-Xa monitoring as they are highest risk for sub-prophylactic levels despite higher initial enoxaparin dosing.

Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Versus Anti-Factor Xa Monitoring of Heparin Anticoagulation in Adult Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients.

The preferred assay for measuring and adjusting unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion to achieve optimal outcomes during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not well established. This retrospective cohort study explored safety and efficacy outcome differences between anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) for UFH in adult venoarterial ECMO. Forty-one patients were included and analyzed. The UFH rate at first goal and time to goal were both higher in the aPTT versus anti-Xa cohort but did not achieve statistical significance (12.14 vs. 9.58 unit/kg/hour (p = 0.29), 20.22 vs. 12.05 hours (p = 0.11)). The aPTT cohort was in target goals 35.0% of the time versus 47.7% in the anti-Xa cohort (p = 0.13), above goal 41.0% vs. 17.3% (p = 0.02), and below-goal 24.0% versus 35.0% of the time (p = 0.34). Minimum heparin rates in the aPTT cohort were 6.28 vs. 3.33 unit/kg/hour in the anti-Xa cohort (p = 0.07), and the maximum UFH rate was 18.77 unit/kg/hour vs. 15.48 unit/kg/hour (p = 0.10). Our findings suggest that aPTT monitoring may result in a delay to target attainment, higher UFH rates, and overall exposure.

2021 Update of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology Recommendations for Laboratory Measurement of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

In 2018, the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) published a consensus document providing guidance for laboratories on measuring direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Since that publication, several significant changes related to DOACs have occurred, including the approval of a new DOAC by the Food and Drug Administration, betrixaban, and a specific DOAC reversal agent intended for use when the reversal of anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban is needed due to life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding, andexanet alfa. In addition, this ICSH Working Party recognized areas where additional information was warranted, including patient population considerations and updates in point-of-care testing. The information in this manuscript supplements our previous ICSH DOAC laboratory guidance document. The recommendations provided are based on (1) information from peer-reviewed publications about laboratory measurement of DOACs, (2) contributing author's personal experience/expert opinion and (3) good laboratory practice.

Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Half-Dose Versus Full-Dose Edoxaban in 14,014 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial, the lower dose edoxaban regimen (LDER) and the higher dose edoxaban regimen (HDER) were noninferior to well-managed warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present analysis of the ENGAGE AF TIMI-48 trial was to comprehensively compare the net clinical outcome (NCO) of LDER (30 mg once daily, dose reduced to 15 mg in selective patients) versus HDER (60 mg once daily, dose reduced to 30 mg in selective patients). METHODS: This study performed a pre-specified analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, comparing patients on LDER versus HDER. RESULTS: The pre-defined primary NCO (stroke/systemic embolism [SEE], major bleeding, death) was less frequent with LDER (7.26% vs. 8.01%; hazard ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.98; p = 0.014). The secondary (disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding, or all-cause mortality) and tertiary pre-defined NCOs (stroke, SEE, life-threatening bleeding, or all-cause mortality) were similar between the 2 dosing regimens. Patients randomized to LDER versus HDER had a significantly higher risk of stroke/SEE (2.04% vs. 1.56%; hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001). Conversely, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, major gastrointestinal bleeding, and life-threatening bleeding occurred significantly less frequently with LDER compared with those of HDER. These findings were supported by multiple pharmacokinetic findings. CONCLUSIONS: In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, the primary NCO was reduced with LDER versus HDER, whereas the secondary and tertiary NCOs were similar between the 2 dosing regimens. These results may aid physicians in evidence-based individualization of edoxaban dosing. However, the approved HDER remains the standard therapy among the available edoxaban dosing regimens for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48 [ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48]; NCT00781391).

Enoxaparin Dose Requirements to Achieve Therapeutic Low-molecular-weight Heparin Anti-factor Xa Levels in Infants and Young Children.

INTRODUCTION: Enoxaparin is commonly used to treat pediatric thrombosis. Several small retrospective studies have suggested that infants and young children require higher enoxaparin doses to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels compared with adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of hospitalized children who received enoxaparin for the treatment of thrombosis at a free-standing children's hospital. The primary objective was to ascertain the enoxaparin dose required to achieve an anti-factor Xa level of 0.5 to 1.0 U/mL among 4 age groups in a large cohort of infants and young children between 60 days and 5 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 176 infants and children were evaluated. The majority of patients were less than 1 year of age (n=104). An inverse relationship between enoxaparin dose needed to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels and patient age was noted, particularly in the first year of life. Patients who were 60 days to less than 7 months at the time of enoxaparin initiation (n=73) required the highest mean dose among the age groups at 1.73 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Infants and young children require higher doses of enoxaparin to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels compared with adults.

Heparin Anti-Xa Activity, a Readily Available Unique Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Fondaparinux, and Danaparoid Levels.

BACKGROUND: Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitor-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. We assessed whether the heparin anti-Xa assay can (1) be used as a screening test to rule out apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid levels that contraindicate invasive procedures according to current guidelines (>30 ng·mL-1, >30 ng·mL-1, >0.1 µg·mL-1, and >0.1 IU·mL-1, respectively), (2) quantify the anticoagulant level if found significant, that is, if it exceeded the abovementioned threshold. METHODS: In the derivation cohort then in the validation cohort, via receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, we evaluated the ability of heparin anti-Xa assay to detect levels of factor-Xa inhibitors above or below the abovementioned safety thresholds recommended for an invasive procedure (screening test). Among samples with relevant levels of factor-Xa inhibitor, we determined the conversion factor linking the measured level and heparin anti-Xa activity in a derivation cohort. In a validation cohort, the estimated level of each factor-Xa inhibitor was thus inferred from heparin anti-Xa activity. The agreement between measured and estimated levels of factor-Xa inhibitors was assessed. RESULTS: Among 989 (355 patients) and 756 blood samples (420 patients) in the derivation and validation cohort, there was a strong linear relationship between heparin anti-Xa activities and factor-Xa inhibitors measured level (r = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.99-0.99]). In the derivation cohort, heparin anti-Xa activity ≤0.2, ≤0.3, <0.1, <0.1 IU·mL-1 reliably ruled out a relevant level of apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid, respectively (area under the ROC curve ≥0.99). In the validation cohort, these cutoffs yielded excellent classification accuracy (≥96%). If this screening test indicated relevant level of factor-Xa inhibitor, estimated and measured levels closely agreed (Lin's correlation coefficient close to its maximal value: 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). More than 96% of the estimated levels fell into the predefined range of acceptability (ie, 80%-120% of the measured level). CONCLUSIONS: A unique simple test already widely used to assay heparin was also useful for quantifying these 4 other anticoagulants. Both clinical and economic impacts of these findings should be assessed in a specific study.