Treatment Gaps and Emerging Therapies in Lumbar Disc Herniation.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) occurs when the central disc material, primarily the nucleus pulposus, is displaced beyond the outer annulus, compressing the spinal nerve roots. LDH symptoms, including radicular leg pain, radiculopathy, and low back pain, are associated with considerable disease burden and the significant utilization of health care resources. OBJECTIVES: Provide overview of the current treatment landscape for LDH, identify unmet needs, and describe emerging treatments. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative literature review. METHODS: A review of literature concerning available LDH treatments and associated outcomes was conducted in PubMed to identify areas of unmet need. Some key words included "lumbar disc herniation," "radicular leg pain," "sciatica," "treatment," "therapy," and "burden." RESULTS: For patients who do not respond to conservative therapy, epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are widely used for persistent LDH symptoms. While ESIs provide short-term improvements in radicular pain, evidence that ESIs bestow sustained benefits is limited. ESIs are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and, in rare cases, carry risks of infection and neurological injury, as well as the potential for long-term systemic effects of glucocorticoids. In cases when nonsurgical treatment fails to relieve symptoms, lumbar discectomy can provide rapid pain relief; however, in addition to the risk of intraoperative complications, the long-term consequences of lumbar discectomy may include recurrent pain or herniation, revision discectomy, loss of disc height, and Modic changes. Treatments for LDH in late-stage clinical development include sustained-release ESI formulations and a novel agent for chemonucleolysis, a nonsurgical method of minimizing the volume of the displaced nucleus pulposus. Emerging minimally invasive therapies that address the underlying pathophysiology of the disease have the potential to bridge the gap between symptomatic treatments and surgery. LIMITATIONS: Because this paper was a narrative review, literature search and selection processes were not systematic in nature. The evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of some treatments, such as discectomy, was limited by the high rates of crossover between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of sustained benefits associated with ESIs and the risks associated with surgery underscore the unmet need for novel, minimally invasive interventional therapies able to address the underlying nerve root compression in LDH.

Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated. RESULTS: Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The positive Lasègue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (p < 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Lasègue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) number: IRCT20111102007984N31.

Influence of Frailty Status on the Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease.

Background: The global increase in the elderly population has led to a higher prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a widely used procedure for managing lower back pain. This study investigated the association of preprocedural frailty status with the efficacy of ESI in elderly patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients aged 65 years and older who underwent lumbar ESI. Frailty status (robust, prefrail, and frail) assessed via the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire was collected along with demographic and clinical parameters. Good analgesia was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in pain score at 4-week follow-up evaluation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor analgesia. Results: We included 289 patients in this study. Frailty status correlated with analgesic outcomes, with worsening frailty status correlating with increasingly poor analgesia after the injection (robust = 34.5%, prefrail = 40.8%, and frail = 60.0%, p=0.003), predominantly in female patients. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, frail patients demonstrated much higher odds of poor analgesia than robust individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.673, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.338-5.342, p=0.005). Conversely, prefrail patients did not show a significant association with analgesic outcome (aOR = 1.293, 95% CI = 0.736-2.272, p=0.372). Conclusions: Frailty, but not prefrailty, appeared to be an independent factor associated with poor analgesic efficacy of ESI in elderly patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal disease receiving conservative care.

Prediction of transforaminal epidural injection success in sciatica (POTEISS): a protocol for the development of a multivariable prediction model for outcome after transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation or stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal epidural injections (TEI) can alleviate symptoms and help to maintain physical functioning and quality of life in patients with lumbar radicular pain. We aim to develop a prediction model for patient outcome after TEI in patients suffering from unilateral lumbar radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) or single-level spinal stenosis (LSS). The secondary aim is to estimate short-term patient outcome differences between LDH and LSS patients, the association between psychological variables and patient outcome, the rate of additional injections, surgery and complications, and to explore the short-term cost-effectiveness of TEI. METHODS: This study is designed as a multi-centre, observational, prospective cohort study in two large regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients diagnosed with unilateral lumbar radicular pain secondary to LDH or LSS and congruent with MRI findings, who are referred for TEI along usual care pathways, are eligible for study participation. A total of 388 patients with LDH or LSS will be included. A pre-defined set of demographic, clinical and radiological variables will be used as the predictors in the model. The primary outcome measure is the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain. Secondary outcome measures include back pain, physical functioning, perceived recovery, pain coping strategies, anxiety and depression and use of analgesics and physical therapy. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 weeks after treatment. NRS leg pain and Likert perceived recovery data will be used as the dependent variables in a generalized linear mixed model for prediction of TEI outcome, with internal validation of performance (explained variation) by bootstrap resampling. Cost-effectiveness for a period of 6 weeks prior to and after treatment will be performed with decision-analytic modelling. DISCUSSION: Patients with severe lumbar radicular pain often request additional treatment when conservative care is insufficient. TEI can offer relief of symptoms. Currently, it is not possible to predict responsiveness to this treatment for individual patients. This study is designed to explore predictors that can differentiate between patients that will and will not have a positive outcome after TEI. This information may support treatment strategies for this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov database under registry number NCT04540068 on September 1, 2020.

Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Dexamethasone, Methylprednisolone and Betamethasone in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.

BACKGROUND: Particulate steroids are thought to exert their effects for long durations at injection sites. However, these types of steroids carry higher risks when used in epidural steroid injections. Catastrophic spinal cord complications, including sudden-onset paraplegia, have been reported due to intravascular particulate steroid preparations that cause embolisms and occlusion of blood vessels, resulting in spinal cord infarctions. Clinicians, therefore, recommend nonparticulate steroids to mitigate these adverse events. To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective study that addresses the effectiveness and safety of methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and betamethasone when used in transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to compare the proportion of patients who received injections of particulate steroids and required zero repeat injections within 12 months of their initial injection to the proportion of patients who received injections of nonparticulate steroids and also required zero repeat injections, as well as to compare the number of patients in the particulate cohort who required one or more repeat injections within 12 months of their initial injection to the number of patients in the nonparticulate cohort who required the same. The secondary goal was to evaluate the proportion of patients ultimately requiring surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-center, IRB-approved, retrospective study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate as compared to particulate steroid medications when used in TFESIs as minimally invasive treatments for chronic lumbar radiculopathy. SETTING: This study captured data (n = 1717) over a 4-year time frame (01/15/2018 to 01/15/2022). METHODS: The following data were collected from each patient's chart: age, gender, BMI, race, date of initial injection, number of repeat injections at the same lumbosacral level and on the same side within 12 months of the initial injection, and lumbar surgery date (if applicable). Inclusion criteria included: 1) having chronic low back pain of radicular etiology; 2) being at least 18 years old; 3) having experienced the failure of conservative therapy after 12 weeks (including physical therapy and/or medications); 4) having positive physical exam findings supporting nerve impingement (straight leg raise, slump test); and 5) showing lumbar MRI evidence of nerve impingement from disc herniation. Exclusion criteria included: 1) having received prior lumbar surgery at any level (L1-S1); 2) having been given prior TFESIs fewer than 6 months prior to initial injection; 3) having contracted a systemic infection at the proposed injection site; 4) undergoing active cancer treatment; and 5) having gotten any other spine injections. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of patients in the nonparticulate steroid cohort received 0 repeat injections (87.5% vs 71.4%, P < 0.001). The particulate steroid cohort demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of patients who received repeat injections within 12 months after the initial injections (12.5% vs 29.6%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among patients requiring surgery between the 2 cohorts. Other outcome measures included the identification of risk factors significantly associated with repeat injections. There was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between age and repeat injections (Pearson corr = 0.102; P < 0.001) and a weak negative correlation between ethnicity/race and repeat injections (point-biserial corr = -0.093; P < 0.001).  No adverse events were reported. LIMITATIONS: Not all clinicians included in this study used each of the 3 steroid types, and all clinicians used either particulate or nonparticulate steroids exclusively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the clinical outcomes associated with TFESIs of nonparticulate steroids are superior to those associated with TFESIs of particulate steroids when either variety of medication is used to treat lumbar radiculopathy. This is the first study to include a clinically useful predictive model using information on laterality, age, and steroid type.

The annoyance of singultus: a case report of a rare adverse effect after epidural steroid injection.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical epidural steroid injections (ESIs) can provide effective pain management for patients suffering from chronic neck pain due to various pathological changes of the cervical spine. There are several rare adverse effects reported from interventional pain procedures, including persistent hiccups ("singultus"). Based on a limited number of cases, we propose a modified treatment algorithm for this adverse outcome (Fig. 3). CASE REPORT: Singultus has been documented as an adverse effect of interventional pain procedures, including epidural steroid, facet joint, and sacroiliac joint injections. We describe the case of a general contractor who presented to our clinic with chronic neck pain and central canal stenosis. The patient received an uncomplicated lumbar ESI in the past and was recommended for a cervical interlaminar ESI. After an uneventful C6-C7 interlaminar ESI with dexamethasone, 1% lidocaine, and normal saline the patient developed singultus. Baclofen was sent to his pharmacy, but this was unsuccessful at alleviating his hiccups. The patient was subsequently started on chlorpromazine and found relief from his symptomatology. CONCLUSION: Persistent hiccups after ESI or interventional pain procedures can be treated with conservative measures and non-pharmacologic methods, with escalation to therapy with baclofen, gabapentin, pregabalin, metoclopramide, chlorpromazine, other antipsychotic or antidopaminergic agents, and possible dual or triple therapy if further indicated.

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis After Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection: A Case Report.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an exceedingly rare complication of epidural anesthesia, with only a handful of known cases after epidural steroid injection (ESI). We report a case of CVST in a 33-year-old male patient that presented with headache after lumbar ESI. His clinical status initially improved on anticoagulation in the intensive care unit. However, he had a sudden worsening of cerebral edema that required an emergent hemicraniectomy. Ultimately, the patient was pronounced dead by neurologic criteria. This case highlights the importance of keeping this rare but potentially fatal diagnosis in the differential even in lower-risk patient populations.

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate vs. nonparticulate steroid: an evidence-informed review on shifting gear to a personalized medicine paradigm.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an evidence-informed review weighing the pros and cons of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI). RECENT FINDINGS: The relative use of nonparticulate vs. particulate steroids for lumbar TFESI has risen recently in light of catastrophic consequences reported for the latter during cervical TFESI. Among various causes of spinal cord infarct, an exceedingly rare event in the lower lumbar spine, embolization of particulate steroid is among the least likely. Case reports have documented cases of spinal cord infarct during lower lumbar TFESI with both particulate and nonparticulate steroids, with database reviews finding no difference in complication rates. There is some evidence for superiority of particulate over nonparticulate steroids in well-designed studies, which could lead to increase steroid exposure (i.e. more injections) and treatment failure resulting in surgical and/or opioid management when nonparticulate steroids are utilized. SUMMARY: Similar to a paradigm shift in medicine, a personalized approach based on a shared decision model and the consequences of treatment failure, should be utilized in deciding which steroid to utilize. Alternatives to ESI include high-volume injections with nonsteroid solutions, and the use of hypertonic saline, which possesses anti-inflammatory properties and has been shown to be superior to isotonic saline in preliminary clinical studies.

Comparison of Single Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections for Treatment of Early and Late Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation.

AIM: To compare the results of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) for pain reduction in ipsilateral early recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) with ipsilateral late RLDH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 738 patients complaining of radicular pain due to ipsilateral early and late RLDH were assessed. Of these, TESI was administered to 390 subjects for ipsilateral early RLDH and 346 for ipsilateral late RLDH. TESIs were performed based on radicular leg pain; all subjects were followed up and reexamined after 12 weeks of the therapy. Pre- and postprocedural visual analog scale (VAS) scores and all complications were recorded for the study. RESULTS: For radicular pain, the mean pre-, and postprocedural VAS scores for ipsilateral early RLDH were 85.44 ± 6.85 and 20.16 ± 3.77 respectively. For late RLDH, the mean pre-, and postprocedural VAS scores were 72.82 ± 5.12 and 30.87 ± 4.17, respectively. A significant statistical difference for pre- and postprocedural VAS scores were observed between ipsilateral early and late recurrent disc herniation TESI groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TESI was more effective for early RLDH than for late RLDH during the 12-week follow-up period.

Analysis of the efficacy of retrodiscal approach percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis with WHIP catheter® in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A retrospective study.

Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) is an effective treatment for patients with lumbar radiculopathy unresponsive to single steroid injections. Various approaches and instruments have been developed to access these lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a retrodiscal approach for epidural adhesiolysis using a WHIP catheter®. This retrospective study was conducted at Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, reviewing cases from January to December 2022. Forty-seven patients diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy, aged 20 to 80 years, who underwent PEA with the WHIP catheter® were included. Outcomes assessed Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores, and the incidence of procedure-related complications. Follow-up evaluations occurred at 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure. Among 47 patients, 41 completed the study, showing significant pain reduction at all follow-up points: 1 month (N = 41, 1.32 ±â€…1.68, P < .001), 3 months (N = 31, 1.90 ±â€…2.14, P < .001), and 6 months (N = 30, 2.50 ±â€…2.30, P < .001). PGIC scores indicated that 40% of the patients reported substantial improvement at one-month post-procedure. The complications were minimal, with only one case of intradiscal injection and 2 cases of vascular uptake. The retrodiscal approach PEA using the WHIP catheter® demonstrated significant efficacy in pain reduction with minimal safety concerns for patients with lumbar radiculopathy. These findings suggest that this procedure is a viable option for patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatment. However, the retrospective nature of this study and its small sample size necessitate further prospective controlled studies to confirm our results and establish long-term outcomes.

Unintentional Injection Into the Retrodural Space of Okada During Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is commonly used for radicular pain, but can lead to an unintentional injection into the retrodural Space of Okada (RSO), an extradural space located dorsal to the ligamentum flavum, instead of the epidural space. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and describe the fluoroscopic imaging features of an unintentional injection into the RSO during a TFESI and to review the history of injections into the RSO. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study and original research. SETTING: This work was conducted at Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea. METHODS: A total of 5,429 lumbar TFESIs performed from the September 1, 2018 through October 31, 2021 were analyzed for unintentional RSO injections using fluoroscopic-guided contrast medium patterns. RESULTS: The rate of unintentional injection into the RSO was 0.20% (11 incidents). Contrast medium patterns in the RSO had a sigmoid or ovoid shape confined to the affected facet joint, or a butterfly-shaped pattern extending into the contralateral facet joint, but rarely extending beyond the upper or lower level. LIMITATION: The rarity of unintentional injection into the RSO prevented a randomized controlled study design. CONCLUSIONS: Careful fluoroscopic examination of contrast medium patterns during lumbar TFESI is crucial to identify needle placement in the RSO. If detected, the procedure can be corrected by slightly advancing the needle into the foramen.

Preliminary evaluation of an indwelling epidural catheter for repeat methylprednisolone administration in canine lumbosacral stenosis.

Objective: To determine the complications, outcomes, and patency of a permanent epidural catheter and subcutaneous access port system (ECAPS) as part of conservative management of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs. Animals and procedure: Medical records of 11 client-owned dogs that underwent an ECAPS insertion were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical signs, complications related to the procedure, and system patency are reported. Results: All dogs had lumbosacral pain at their initial neurological assessment, with comfort levels adequately controlled following epidural infiltrations. None suffered from complications related to the ECAPS procedure. In 10 dogs, there were no malfunctions for the duration of the study. However, in 1 dog, there was a suspected leak at Day 814. The longest duration of patency reported in this study was 870 d (at the time of writing). Conclusion: Placement of an ECAPS is a feasible technique and a viable option to permit repeated epidural injections of steroids in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis that is managed conservatively. Further studies are required to evaluate complication rates.

Évaluation préliminaire d'un cathéter épidural permanent (à demeure) pour l'administration répétée de méthylprednisolone lors de sténose lombosacrée dégénérative chez le chien. Objectif: Décrire la technique, les complications, les résultats et la perméabilité d'un système composé d'un cathéter épidural et d'un port d'injection sous-cutanée (ECAPS) pour le traitement médical de la sténose lombosacrée dégénérative chez le chien. Animaux et protocole: Les dossiers médicaux de 11 chiens appartenant à des clients ayant subi l'implantation d'un ECAPS ont été évalués de façon rétrospective. Cette étude décrit les signes cliniques, les complications reliées à la procédure et la perméabilité du système. Résultats: Tous les patients inclus présentaient de la douleur lombosacrée à l'examen initial. Le niveau de confort de tous les patients suite aux injections épidurales fut maitrisé de façon adéquate. Aucun des patients n'a subi de complications reliées à l'implantation du système. Le système n'a pas démontré de dysfonctionnement dans le cas de dix patients. Chez un des patients, une fuite fut suspectée au jour 814. La durée maximale de perméabilité enregistrée dans cette étude est de 870 jours (au moment de la rédaction). Conclusion: L'implantation d'un système ECAPS représente une option faisable et viable pour l'administration additionnelle de stéroïdes pour une gestion conservatrice de sténose lombosacrée dégénérative chez les chiens atteints. Des recherches supplémentaires sont requises pour l'évaluation des taux de complications.(Traduit par les auteurs).

Epidural Hematoma Associated with Red Clover Use After Epidural Injection: A Case Report.

An epidural hematoma is a rare but devastating complication after interventional pain procedures. The etiology is multifactorial, including anatomical variations, inherited coagulation disorders, and consumption of anticoagulants or antiplatelet substances. Specifically, in regard to platelet aggregation, the consumption of herbal medicine is often forgotten as a potential cause for coagulation profile disorders, potentially leading to an epidural hematoma. We present the case of a patient who developed an epidural hematoma after a cervical epidural block, most likely associated with daily "red clover" consumption.

Combined Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy versus Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term effectiveness and safety of a combined ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy (FL)-guided approach in comparison to US-guided and FL-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESI) for treating unilateral lower lumbar radicular pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 patients who underwent CESI between 2018 and 2022 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the guidance method: combined US and FL (n = 51), US-guided (n = 51), and FL-guided (n = 52). The study design was retrospective case-controlled, utilizing patient charts and standardized forms to assess clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications during the procedures. Results: In all groups, Oswestry Disability Index and Verbal Numeric Scale scores improved at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection, with no significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). The treatment success rate at all time points was also similar among the groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that injection method, cause, sex, age, number of injections, and pain duration did not independently predict treatment success. Blood was aspirated before injection in 2% (n = 1), 13.5% (n = 7), and 4% (n = 2) of patients in the combined US and FL groups, FL-guided groups, and US-guided groups, respectively. Intravascular contrast spread was detected in one patient in the combined method groups and seven in the FL-guided groups. Conclusions: When comparing pain reduction and functional improvement, there was no significant difference between the three methods. The combined method took less time compared to using FL alone. The combined approach also showed a lower occurrence of intravascular injection compared to using FL alone. Moreover, blood vessels at the injection site can be identified with an ultrasound using the combined method. Given these advantages, it might be advisable to prioritize the combined US- and FL-guided therapy when administering CESI for patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain.

Cost-effectiveness of Transforaminal epidural steroid injections for patients with ACUTE sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal epidural injections with steroids (TESI) are increasingly being used in patients sciatica. The STAR (steroids against radiculopathy)-trial aimed to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of TESI in patients with acute sciatica (< 8 weeks). This article contains the economic evaluation of the STAR-trial. METHODS: Participants were randomized to one of three study arms: Usual Care (UC), that is oral pain medication with or without physiotherapy, n = 45); intervention group 1: UC and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) 1 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine and 1 ml of 40 mg/ml Methylprednisolone and intervention group 2: UC and transforaminal epidural injection (TEI) with 1 ml of 0,5% Levobupivacaine and 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl (n = 50). The primary effect measure was health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes were pain, functioning, and recovery. Costs were measured from a societal perspective, meaning that all costs were included, irrespective of who paid or benefited. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation, and bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty. RESULTS: None of the between-group differences in effects were statistically significant for any of the outcomes (QALY, back pain, leg pain, functioning, and global perceived effect) at the 26-weeks follow-up. The adjusted mean difference in total societal costs was €1718 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 3020 to 6052) for comparison 1 (intervention group 1 versus usual care), €1640 (95%CI: - 3354 to 6106) for comparison 2 (intervention group 1 versus intervention group 2), and €770 (95%CI: - 3758 to 5702) for comparison 3 (intervention group 2 versus usual care). Except for the intervention costs, none of the aggregate and disaggregate cost differences were statistically significant. The maximum probability of all interventions being cost-effective compared to the control was low (< 0.7) for all effect measures. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that adding TESI (or TEI) to usual care is not cost-effective compared to usual care in patients with acute sciatica (< 8 weeks) from a societal perspective in a Dutch healthcare setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch National trial register: NTR4457 (March, 6th, 2014).

Effects of epidural steroid injections on menstrual cycle in women: An observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of epidural steroid injections on the menstrual cycle of women and to identify risk factors in those with changes. METHODS: A total of 78 women who had epidural steroid injections between the ages of 18 and 55 years were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were called by phone and asked whether there was any change in their menstrual cycles after the epidural injections. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics, body height and weight, education status, alcohol and smoking habits, comorbidities, number of children, birth control method, history of cesarean section, miscarriage, and abortion were recorded. RESULTS: Changes in the menstrual cycle were seen in five of 12 patients who underwent cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection, in 27 of 56 patients who underwent lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection, in one of two patients who underwent lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection, and in three of eight patients who underwent caudal epidural steroid injection. The number of patients with obesity was higher in the patients with changes than those without, indicating a statistically significant difference (41.7% vs. 14.3%, respectively; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that epidural steroid injections are associated with changes in the menstrual cycle. Obesity is a risk factor for menstrual cycle changes after epidural steroid injections.

Comparison of the Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator and Quincke Needle for Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.

AIM: To compare the procedural features of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) performed using two different needles (Stimuplex® and Quincke) in terms of procedure time, exposed radiation dose and adverse effects and complications, thus providing preliminary data to aid needle selection for TFESI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who received fluoroscopy-guided single-level lumbosacral TFESI between September 2020 and September 2021 were retrospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups with respect to the needle type used for the procedure ? those treated with a Quincke needle were classified as Group Q and those treated with a Stimuplex® needle comprised Group S. Subsequently, the two groups were compared in terms of their demographic data, procedure time, radiation dose, amount of contrast use, first-hour numeric rating scale (NRS), intravascular flow and complication rates. RESULTS: The number of patients recruited for Groups Q and S was 65 and 61, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding their demographic data, preprocedural NRS scores, procedure time, exposed radiation dose and the amount of contrast dye used. Notably, the first-hour NRS scores were found to be significantly lower in Group S (p=0.040) after the procedure. Moreover, the intravascular contrast spread was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05) ? it was encountered during four procedures in Group Q, but was altogether absent in Group S. CONCLUSION: The Stimuplex® needle may decrease the possibility of inadvertent intravascular leakages during TFESI and may also improve immediate pain scores after the procedure.