The stability of psychological adjustment among donor-conceived offspring in the U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study from childhood to adulthood: differences by donor type.

OBJECTIVE: To study differences by sperm donor type in the psychological adjustment of the U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study (NLLFS) offspring across three time periods from childhood to adulthood. DESIGN: U.S.-based prospective cohort study. SETTING: Paper-and-pencil questionnaires and protected online surveys. PATIENT(S): A cohort of 74 offspring conceived by lesbian parents using an anonymous (n = 26), a known (n = 26), or an open-identity (n = 22) sperm donor. Data were reported when offspring were ages 10 (wave 4), 17 (wave 5), and 25 (wave 6). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist administered to lesbian parents when offspring were ages 10 and 17 and the Achenbach Adult Self-Report administered to offspring at age 25. RESULT(S): In both relative and absolute stability, no differences were found in internalizing, externalizing, and total problem behaviors by donor type over 15 years. However, both externalizing and total problem behaviors significantly declined from age 10 to 17 and then increased from age 17 to 25. Irrespective of donor type, among the 74 offspring, the large majority scored continuously within the normal range on internalizing (n = 62, 83.8%), externalizing (n = 62, 83.8%), and total problem behaviors (n = 60, 81.1%). CONCLUSION(S): The results reassure prospective lesbian parents and provide policy makers and reproductive medicine practitioners with empirical evidence that psychological adjustment in offspring raised by lesbian parents is unrelated to donor type in the long term.

The maternal and perinatal implications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a multiple pregnancy cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are common and may result in increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Multiple pregnancies confer an increased risk of development of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to examine a large cohort of women delivering a multiple pregnancy in a single large tertiary unit, and to evaluate the implications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on both maternal and perinatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all twin pregnancies delivered at Cork University Maternity Hospital, Ireland over a 9-year period (2009-2017). The twin pregnancies were divided according to the presence or absence of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Maternal age >40 years, nulliparity, conception through use of a donor oocyte, and presence of obstetric cholestasis are all risk factors for the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in women with a multiple pregnancy. When a hypertensive disorder complicates a twin pregnancy, it increases the incidence of iatrogenic late prematurity and neonatal hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study is informative for clinicians caring for women with a multiple pregnancy with its relevant data on perinatal outcomes following a diagnosis of hypertensive disorder in pregnancy.

The incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy following sperm donation in IVF: an Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Does IVF using donor sperm increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth restriction (FGR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: IVF conceptions arising from sperm donation are not associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or FGR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It has been hypothesized that the absence of prior exposure to factors within the paternal ejaculate increases the risk of preeclampsia and FGR among nulliparous women or women with a new partner-the concept of 'primipaternity'. It remains unclear which element of the ejaculate is responsible: the sperm cell or the constituents of seminal fluid. IVF pregnancies arising from donor sperm where the seminal fluid is absent provide a unique opportunity to test the theory of primipaternity and the relative contribution of the sperm cell. Pregnancies conceived via artificial reproductive technology are at increased risk of preeclampsia and FGR. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Theories about the development of preeclampsia and the relative contribution of spermatic factors were explored by comparing the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and FGR among IVF pregnancies conceived with autologous gametes (own eggs and partner sperm) and those conceived with donor sperm, donor egg (and partner sperm) and donor embryo. To do this, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies (n = 15 443) conceived through fertility clinics within Australia between 2009 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All pregnancies resulting in a singleton pregnancy delivering after 20 weeks' gestation were included. The cohort was divided into donor sperm, donor egg and donor embryo (where both gametes came from a donor to create an embryo, or in a surrogate pregnancy) groups. We also compared the data with a control group, defined as IVF-conceived pregnancies from autologous cycles. A multivariable regression model was used to calculate an adjusted odds ratio (aOR). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The final cohort contained 1435, 578 and 239 pregnancies conceived by donor sperm, donor egg and donor embryo, respectively, and 13 191 controls. There were a very small number of women lost to follow-up (31 women; 0.2% of total cohort). Compared to control pregnancies, there was no increase in the risk of hypertensive disorders among pregnancies conceived via donor sperm (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.73-1.21). Subgroup analysis was performed for a cohort where parity was known (n = 4551), and of these, 305 multigravida pregnancies were conceived via donor sperm. Among this cohort, no increased risk of preeclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension was found (aOR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.69-2.04) as a result of primipaternity (new sperm donor).A significantly increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was associated with the use of donor eggs (but partner sperm; aOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.69-3.21). However, the association was no greater among pregnancies conceived with donor embryos (i.e. donated egg and sperm; aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.25-3.17) than among the donor oocyte group. The overall incidence of FGR (defined as birthweight <10th centile) was 18%. There were no significant differences observed between donor sperm, or donor embryo pregnancies; however, egg donation was associated with a 1.5-fold increase in FGR. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was limited by a lower than expected rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (n = 862, 5.6%), which is contrary to the well-established increased risk among women using IVF. However, this is likely to be evenly distributed across the study groups and, therefore, unlikely to have introduced significant bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These findings suggest that exposure to new sperm may not be implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The mechanism of increased risk seen in conceptions arising from egg or embryo donation remains unclear. Further investigation is required to elucidate these mechanisms and, ultimately, improve pregnancy outcomes following IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Australian Commonwealth Government-Graduate Research Scheme (A.K.). Salary support was provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (S.T.), Mercy Foundation (A.L.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of Melbourne (R.H.). There are no competing interests.

Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worse.

STUDY QUESTION: Are there differences in the clinical outcomes of IUI among different populational groups (heterosexual couples, single women and lesbian couples)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The outcome of donor IUI (D-IUI) is similar in all populational groups and better than that seen with autologous insemination. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A vast body of literature on clinical outcome is available for counselling heterosexual couples regarding decisions related to ART. The reproductive potential of single women, lesbian couples and heterosexual couples who need donor semen is assumed to be better, but there is a scarcity of data on their ART performance to actually confirm it. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, a total of 7228 IUI treatment cycles performed in 3807 patients between January 2013 and December 2016 in 13 private clinics belonging to the same reproductive medicine group in Spain were included. Patients with previous IUI attempts were excluded from the study. Only 1.9% of cycles were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 5318 D-IUI cycles were performed in three different populational groups: heterosexual couples (D-HC, 1167 cycles), single women (SW, 2839 cycles) and lesbian couples (LC, 1312), while a total of 1910 autologous IUI cycles were performed in heterosexual couples (A-HC). This last one was considered the control group and was composed of cycles performed in couples with a male partner with sperm parameters equivalent to those requested from donors. In order to identify factors with an impact on clinical outcome, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Regarding live birth rate (LBR), mixed effect models were employed to control for the fact that different patients were submitted to different numbers of treatments. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Parameters that were significant to the primary outcome (LBR) according to the multivariate analysis were the populational group (D-HC, SW, LC and A-HC) to which the patient belonged, female age and a diagnosis of low ovarian reserve. At the age range of good prognosis (≤37 years), LBR was similar in all groups that underwent D-IUI (18.8% for D-HC, 16.5% for SW and 17.6% for LC) but was significantly lower in the autologous IUI (A-HC) group (11%). For all these significant findings, the strength of the association was confirmed by P values <0.001. From 38 years of age on, no significant differences were observed among the populational groups studied, and for all of them, LBR was below 7% from 40 years of age on. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: To the best of our knowledge, a smoking habit was the only known factor with a potential effect on ART outcome that could not be controlled for, due to the unavailability of this information in a significant percentage of the clinical files studied. Our study was not capable of precisely quantifying the impact of a diagnosis of low ovarian reserve on the LBR of both IUI and D-IUI, due to the number of cycles performed in patients with such diagnosis (n = 231, 3.2% of the total). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: For the first time, a comparison among D-HC, SW, LC and A-HC was performed in a study with a robust sample size and controlling for potential sources of bias. There is now sound evidence that equivalent clinical outcome is seen in the three groups treated with donor semen (D-HC, SW and LC). Specifically, regarding the comparison between SW and LC, our findings rule out differences in LBR proposed by previous publications, with very similar clinical outcomes within the same age ranges. At age ranges of good prognosis (≤37 years), reproductive performance of D-IUI is significantly better than that seen in heterosexual couples undergoing autologous IUI, even when only cases of optimal sperm quality are considered in this last group. This finding is in agreement with the concept that, as a group, A-HC are more prone to have female factor infertility, even when their infertility assessment finds no contraindication to IUI. Age affects all these groups equally, with none of them reaching a 7% LBR after the age of 40 years. Our findings will be useful for the counselling of patients from the different populations studied here about ART strategies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.

Estimates of donated sperm use in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth 1995-2017.

OBJECTIVE: To provide national estimates of donor insemination (DI) use in the United States and a description of the population of users. DESIGN: Population estimates were generated from nationally representative data through weighted proportions and count estimates. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Participants were U.S. women of childbearing age (15-44 years) sampled for interview in the National Survey of Family Growth. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Respondents who reported having received artificial insemination were asked the origin of the sperm. Responses could include husband/partner, donor only, or mixed donor and husband/partner. RESULT(S): In 1995, an estimated 170,701 (95% confidence interval 106,577-234,825) women had undergone DI using donor or mixed sperm. In 2015-2017, 440,986 (95% confidence interval 108,458-773,513) women were estimated to have used it. The DI users were mostly white, urban, older, college-educated, and had high family incomes. CONCLUSION(S): The DI use changed over time, from a decrease between 1995 and 2013 to a precipitous growth in 2015 to 2017. In recent years, nearly half a million women may be dealing with personal, relationship, and familial issues born of DI use. The United States does not maintain records on the usage of donor sperm, but better tracking of the use and outcomes of treatment would provide better estimates of the size of the affected population.

Genetic databases and the future of donor anonymity.

Anonymity is a multifaceted term. Anonymity is rarely eternal or absolute. The use of genetic databases increases the risk of identification of previously anonymous donors. Searches through genetic databases jeopardize the privacy of people who did and did not register on them. Three types of searches can be distinguished in the context of gamete donation: offspring looking for their donor, offspring looking for donor siblings and donors looking for their donor offspring. All three types of searches violate the rights of recipients and donors. It is argued that despite the existence of genetic databases, anonymity maintains the same function as it had before: it expresses a wish for distance and privacy by both donors and recipients and, even if not enforceable, should be respected by all parties in good faith.

Effects of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcome after 8570 artificial insemination cycles with donor's sperm.

Increased body mass index (BMI) might have an adverse effect on pregnancy. However, the influence of BMI on the pregnancy outcomes after artificial insemination with donor's sperm (AID) had been rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between BMI and AID. The pregnancy outcome of 8570 AID cycles was retrospectively analyzed. BMI was categorized as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2; group A), normal weight (18.5-23.9 kg/m2; group B), overweight (24-27.9 kg/m2; group C), and obese (≥28 kg/m2; group D). The results showed that cumulative pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate in groups A, B, C and D tended to decrease as BMI increased; however, abortion rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate in groups A, B, C, and D exhibited a gradual increase in the tendency. Cesarean delivery rate also increased as BMI increased. Birth defect rate in the group D were significantly higher than that in the group A. Interestingly, the pregnancy rate was gradually decreased with increasing age in groups A, B, and C, but this was not observed in the group D. The findings suggested that BMI can affect the pregnancy outcomes after AID; it is important to achieve a normal BMI prior to AID treatments.

Clinical and neonatal outcomes of intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm.

This retrospective study evaluated the association between frozen donor sperm used for intrauterine insemination and clinical and neonatal outcomes, including 304 singleton pregnancies resulting from artificial insemination by the husband (AIH) and 173 singleton pregnancies resulting from artificial insemination by a donor (AID). The clinical outcomes for AID showed no increased risk of abortion, ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy complications compared to those for AIH. There were no differences in gender, gestational age or prematurity of live births between the two groups. However, the birthweight of live births from AID was significantly higher than that from AIH. Moreover, the AID group exhibited no increased risk of stillbirths or fetal defects compared to the AIH group. These results indicate that frozen donor sperm did not increase the occurrence of adverse clinical and neonatal outcomes when compared to sperm from the husband. ABBREVIATIONS: AID: artificial insemination by a donor; AIH: artificial insemination by the husband; ART: assisted reproduction technology; FET: frozen embryo transfer; IVF: in vitro fertilization; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IUI: intrauterine insemination; LBW: low birth weight.

Motivations and attitudes of candidate sperm donors in Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: To study the motivation and attitudes of a candidate sperm donor population in Belgium. DESIGN: Anonymous survey. SETTING: Tertiary referral infertility center. PATIENT(S): One hundred candidate sperm donors applying to the center for a first semen analysis between April 2013 and March 2016. INTERVENTION(S): Invitation to complete an anonymous questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Demographic characteristics, recruitment methods, motivations and attitudes toward payment, donor anonymity, disclosure to offspring, donation to lesbian couples and single women, views on the donor children and social aspects of sperm donation. RESULT(S): The majority of our candidate donor population were older men with a partner who were donating sperm for altruistic reasons. The financial compensation was only an important motivational factor in 31% of the candidate sperm donors. Eighty-two percent of the men said they were willing to reveal nonidentifying information about themselves to donor offspring, but only 26% were willing to donate nonanonymously. The wish to receive certain information about the recipient family and the donor offspring was linked to men who had a partner and a child of their own. CONCLUSION(S): The wish to receive and donate information depends on the characteristics and beliefs of the candidate donors. Also, the donor's characteristics were linked to the acceptance of meeting the offspring in the future: the donors with a partner and donors who said they would donate without financial reimbursement were less willing to meet the donor offspring.

Sperm donor conception and disclosure to children: a 10-year retrospective follow-up study of parental attitudes in one French center for the study and preservation of eggs and sperm (CECOS).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the percentage of parents in one French center for the study and preservation of eggs and sperm who disclose their use of donated spermatozoa to their children. DESIGN: A questionnaire survey of couples who had a child using donated spermatozoa. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. PATIENT(S): One hundred five couples. INTERVENTION(S): Questionnaire sent by mail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The percentage of parents who disclose their use of donated spermatozoa to their child. RESULT(S): Among the 157 questionnaires sent, 105 couples answered, which corresponded to 138 children. There were 40 (38%) couples who had already disclosed the donor origin to their child and 65 (62%) who had not. Of the 40 couples who disclosed the donor origin, 37 (93%) had intended to do so before making use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART), but two (5%) had not wanted to do so before ART. Among the 65 couples who did not inform their child, 42 (65%) planned to inform their child soon, but 20 (31%) wanted to keep the sperm origin secret. Of the 20 couples who wanted to keep the origin secret, nine couples had told other persons about the gamete donation but had not informed their child and do not intend to inform their child in the future. CONCLUSION(S): This first report about disclosure attitude in a large cohort of parents of donor-conceived offspring in France showed that most parents had already disclosed their use of donated spermatozoa to their children or intended to disclose it soon and had an attitude after birth consistent with their intentions prior to ART.

Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination with frozen donor semen: a prospective cohort study.

The extent to which certain parameters can influence pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination with frozen donor semen was examined prospectively. Between July 2011 and September 2015, 402 women received 1264 IUI cycles with frozen donor semen in a tertiary referral infertility centre. A case report form was used to collect data prospectively. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), confirmed by detection of a gestational sac and fetal heartbeat using ultrasonography at 7-8 weeks of gestation. Statistical analysis was carried out using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for the correlation between observations from the same patient. Overall, CPR per cycle was 17.2%. Multivariate GEE analysis revealed the following parameters as predictive for a successful pregnancy outcome: female age (P = 0.0003), non-smoking or smoking fewer than 15 cigarettes a day (P = 0.0470 and P = 0.0235, respectively), secondary infertility (P = 0.0062), low progesterone levels at day zero of the cycle (P = 0.0164) and use of ovarian stimulation with HMG and recombinant FSH compared with clomiphene citrate and natural cycle (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0004, respectively). These parameters were the most important factors influencing the success rate in a sperm donation programme.

Utilization of fertility treatment and reproductive choices by lesbian couples.

OBJECTIVE: To describe intentions and outcomes of lesbian couples requesting reproductive assistance; and report number of cycles needed to achieve a live birth. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: University-based fertility center. PATIENT(S): A total of 306 lesbian couples who sought reproductive assistance between 2004 and 2015. INTERVENTION(S): Intrauterine insemination or IVF using donor sperm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean age, relationship status, family size, preconception goals, conception attempts, number of cycles to achieve a live birth. RESULT(S): Preconception plans were available for 233 couples: 76.4% planned for one partner to conceive and carry (single partner conception); 23.6% planned for both partners to eventually conceive and carry (dual partner conception). Of 306 couples who presented, 85.1% attempted single partner conception, and 68% of these achieved a live birth. Dual partner conception was attempted by 14.9% of couples, and 88.9% achieved a live birth. Of those who conceived with IUI, a mean (±SD) of 3 ± 1.1 cycles were completed. Of those who conceived with IVF, a mean of 6 ± 1.4 IUI and 1.7 ± 0.3 IVF cycles were completed. CONCLUSION(S): Lesbian couples may improve their likelihood of a live birth if both partners attempt conception. Further studies are needed to understand why one-fifth of patients did not pursue treatment.

Short-term safety evaluation of the offspring conceived by 7272 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoon.

This case-control study was designed to investigate the safety of the AID technology. The health status of the offspring conceived by 1620 couples who underwent 7272 AID cycles in our Center for Reproductive Medicine between June 2006 and December 2012 was retrospectively analysed. The control group included 1018 women who naturally conceived and delivered in the same period. Twin birth rate was significantly higher in the AID group (no triplet birth) than in the control group (2.01% versus 0.39%, P < 0.01). In the AID group, Caesarean delivery was used in 1299 cases (81.65%), spontaneous vaginal delivery (18.04%) and forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (0.31%).There was no significant difference in male/female ratio of the offspring between AID and control groups (113.55 : 100 versus 113.36 : 100, P > 0.05). Compared to natural pregnancy, a pregnancy through AID resulted in higher multiple birth rate, premature delivery rate and neonatal congenital malformation rate. Increased multiple birth rate was attributable to ovulation induction, and increased rate of low-birthweight infants was related to multiplets and premature delivery. Caesarean delivery was preferred in couples who received AID treatment. The male/female ratio of the AID offspring was similar between natural pregnancy and AID pregnancy.

O casal homossexual e a inseminação artificial heteróloga / The homosexual couple and the artificial heterologous insemination

Objetivos: Avaliar o perfil epidemiológico de pacientes submetidas à inseminação artificial heteróloga (IAH), estabelecer a taxa de gravidez e de gestação múltipla e reconhecer a prevalência dos casais homossexuais como elemento de indicação. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo, retrospectivo e quantitativo feito de janeiro de 2009 a outubro de 2014, na Clínica Fértile – Reprodução Humana, que avaliou os procedimentos de IAH. Resultados: Foram analisadas 67 pacientes submetidas a 156 ciclos de tratamento, média de 2,3 procedimentos por paciente. A faixa etária mais prevalente situou‐se entre 18 e 35 anos (55,2%). A principal indicação foi o fator masculino (70,1%). O padrão espermático mais prevalente foi entre 1 e 5 milhões de espermatozoides/mL (53,9%). A taxa de gravidez por ciclo foi de 17,3%. Foram obtidas 7 gestações múltiplas (4,48%). Das 67 pacientes, 9 procuraram a IAH por serem casais homossexuais (13,5%). Conclusão:O perfil epidemiológico foi idade entre 18 e 35 anos, indicação principal o fator masculino e padrão espermático entre 1 e 5 milhões. A taxa de gravidez por ciclo foi de 17,3% com uma taxa de gestações múltiplas de 4,48%. A prevalência de casais homossexuais durante o estudo foi de 13,5%.

Aims: To evaluate the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing heterologous artificial insemination (HAI), establish the rate of pregnancy and multiple pregnancy and recognize the prevalence of homosexual couples as an indication element for the procedure. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective and quantitative study conducted from January 2009 to October 2014, in the Fertile Clinic ‐ Human Reproduction assessing the HAI procedures. Results: We analyzed 67 patients who underwent 156 cycles of treatment with an average of 2.3 procedures per patient. The most prevalent age group was among 18 and 35 representing 55.2%. The main indication for the procedure was the male factor (70.1%). In most prevalent standard sperm concentration was between 1 and 5 million sperm/ml (53.9%) The cycle for pregnancy rate was 17.3%. Seven obtained multiple pregnancies (4.48%) and 5 of these were twins (3.2%) and 2 triplets (1.28%). Of the 67 patients, nine sought to HAI for being homosexual couples representing a rate of 13.5% of patients. Conclusion: The epidemiological profile was represented as follows: age among 18 and 35, the main indication was the male factor and the spermatic standard donated semen was between 1 and 5 million. The cycle for pregnancy rate was 17.3% with a rate of multiple pregnancies of 4.48%, 3.2% were twins and 1.28% triplets. The prevalence of homosexual couples during the study was 13.5%.

How well are lesbians treated in UK fertility clinics?

Legislation regulating fertility treatment in the United Kingdom originally discouraged treatment without a father, resulting in many clinics denying access to lesbian couples. Lesbians now enjoy rights to legal union, dual parenthood and protection against discrimination. Consequently, increasing numbers seek fertility treatment. This is a growing stakeholder group, but it is unknown whether UK licensed centres are serving them adequately. Data from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority suggests live birth rates after in vitro fertilisation for lesbians is comparable to estimates for natural attempt at pregnancy for heterosexuals, whereas success rates with donor insemination are lower. Unsurprisingly, live birth rates for lesbians after in vitro fertilisation are higher compared with heterosexual couples (the latter attending with fertility issues). However, outcomes for lesbians after donor insemination are slightly lower, potentially due to increased female age. Rather than adopting a one-heterosexual-size-fits-all approach, lesbian couples may benefit from new treatment pathways. They also have a different experience of fertility treatment, some reporting a wish to be presumed fertile rather than medicalised, and others encountering heterosexism by fertility professionals. Additionally, some lesbians with known fertility issues have needed to resort to legal action to obtain the publicly funded treatment they are entitled to.

Deficiencies in reporting results of lesbians and gays after donor intrauterine insemination and assisted reproductive technology treatments: a review of the first emerging studies.

At a time when increasing numbers of lesbians and gays consider parenthood using reproductive assistance in infertility centers, the present review aims to summarize the results obtained so far by lesbians after intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) using donor spermatozoa (D-IUI and D-IVF, respectively) and gays entering into gestational-surrogacy programs. Data show that gays display normal semen parameters and lesbians exhibit no specific causes of female infertility except perhaps for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and some PCOS-related factors. Pair-bonded lesbians entering into D-IUI programs, tend to have higher pregnancy and delivery percentages following spontaneous or induced ovulation than single or pair-bound heterosexual women. The only single study reporting success percentages of lesbians after D-IVF provides, however, puzzling results. In particular, pair-bonded lesbians have lower pregnancy and live-birth percentages than pair-bonded heterosexual women in fresh D-IVF cycles but percentages are similar in frozen/thawed D-IVF cycles. Like in lesbians after D-IUI, surrogate women recruited by pair-bonded gays/single men tend to have higher pregnancy percentages and lower miscarriage percentages than surrogate women recruited by heterosexual couples. Notably, all the reports reviewed in the present study are methodologically flawed because of sampling bias, small sample sizes and inadequate use of statistical methods to control for the effects of influential covariates including age, smoking habits, previous gynecological problems, hormonal stimulation type and protocol, and number of prior treatment types and pregnancies/deliveries. Clinicians, reproductive biologists and editors of fertility/infertility journals should make efforts to prevent these deficiencies in future data reporting.

Satisfaction with known, open-identity, or unknown sperm donors: reports from lesbian mothers of 17-year-old adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether lesbian mothers of 17-year-old adolescents conceived through donor insemination are satisfied with their choice of a known, open-identity, or unknown sperm donor and whether the mothers' satisfaction is associated with psychological health problems in the index adolescent offspring. DESIGN: Mixed-method study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): One hundred twenty-nine lesbian mothers and 77 index offspring. INTERVENTION(S): Semistructured interviews with the mothers conducted by telephone and the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI) completed online by the adolescent offspring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Satisfaction with the type of sperm donor selected was assessed through multiple choice questions, and adolescent psychological health problems by the STPI. The reasons for the mothers' (dis)satisfaction were evaluated through a thematic analysis of transcribed interviews. RESULT(S): Overall, 77.5% of mothers were satisfied with the type of donor chosen. There were no significant differences between birth mothers and comothers on (dis)satisfaction. In comparing satisfied with dissatisfied birth mothers by donor type, the only significant differences were that those selecting open-identity donors were more satisfied than dissatisfied and that those using unknown donors were more dissatisfied than satisfied; (dis)satisfaction with donor type was unrelated to offspring psychological health problems. Qualitative analyses revealed six themes concerning all mothers' reasons for (dis)satisfaction. CONCLUSION(S): Donor access and custody concerns were the primary themes mentioned by lesbian mothers regarding their (dis)satisfaction with the type of sperm donor they had selected.

Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI with donor spermatozoa in different age groups.

This retrospective cohort study followed a total of 364 women from their first fresh, donor intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle through to up to six ICSI cycles. All patients started their treatment between January 2003 and December 2007. Live delivery after 25 weeks of gestation was the main outcome measure. The overall crude cumulative delivery rate (CDR) after six cycles was 66% while the overall expected CDR was 90%. In women aged 38-39 years, the crude and expected CDR after six cycles were 54% and 82%, respectively. In women aged 30-37 years, the crude and expected CDR after six cycles were 66% and 91%, respectively. In women aged 20-29 years the crude and expected CDR after six cycles were 81% and 93%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the CDR of patients who had a primary ICSI treatment (no previous intrauterine insemination) and patients who had previous intrauterine insemination. This study corroborates the impact of age on ICSI with donor spermatozoa.

Numerical limits in donor conception regimes: genetic links and 'extended family' in the era of identity disclosure.

This article critically examines the setting of limits on the number of children or family groups that may be formed with a single donor in assisted conception regimes. Originally, under conditions of anonymity, numerical limits were said to contain the risk of inadvertent consanguinity between offspring who would not know, and could not know, that they were genetic half siblings, and also between donor and offspring. The increasing embrace of identity disclosure regimes has led to calls for stricter numerical limits based on the purported harm of being exposed to 'too many' genetic relatives in the future. This article asks: how many is too many? And how do we know? The UK and Australian positions are examined, and placed alongside a discussion of qualitative research involving interviews with twenty parents of donor conceived children.

[Prognostic factors of pregnancy in intra-uterine insemination with sperm of donor: a review of 535 cycles over 7 years]. / Facteurs pronostiques de grossesse en insémination intra-utérine avec sperme de donneur: analyse sur 535 cycles.

AIM: To determine the pronostic factors of pregnancy in intra-uterine insemination using sperm of donor (IIU-D) by analysing female factors, data from the ovarian stimulation and even the characteristics of the donor selected for the recipient couple. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study between January 2002 and December 2009. It took place at the University and Hospital of Amiens over 149 couples performing a total of 535 IIU-D cycles. Factors related to the pregnancy were defined thanks to uni and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Female age was 30.6 ± 4.3 years old (6% of the cycles with women>38). The initiated pregnancy rate per cycle was 27.9%; the birth rate per cycle was 20.4% and the cumulative live birth rate over 63.4% for six cycles. In multivariate analysis prognostic factors of success were: day 3 of estradiol level less than 80 pg/mL (P<0.05), no tube defects (P=0.022), cured and benign womb pathology (P=0.005), a higher number of follicles greater than 16 mm the day of the ovulation triggering (P=0.0018) and a higher number of pregnancies already obtained by the donor in ART in the CECOS (P<0.001). Neither the female age nor the donor age was associated with a probability of success. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Classical pronostic factors concerning the female profile and the ovarian stimulation quality have been found. But the most interesting and original part is that the most significant factor concerns the donor and his history of pregnancy in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in the center. This may be very useful to guide the choice of the donor for the recipients.