The Dejour classification for trochlear dysplasia shows slight interobserver and substantial intraobserver reliability.

PURPOSE: Trochlear dysplasia is one of the main risk factors for recurrent patellar dislocation. The Dejour classification identifies four categories that can be used to classify trochlear dysplasia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Dejour classification for trochlear dysplasia. The hypothesis was that both intra- and interobserver reliability would be at least moderate. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, reliability study. Twenty-eight examiners from the International Patellofemoral Study Group 2022 meeting evaluated lateral radiographs of the knee and axial magnetic resonance images from 15 cases of patellofemoral instability with trochlear dysplasia. They classified each case according to Dejour's classification for trochlear dysplasia (A-D). There were three rounds: one with only computed radiograph (CR), one with only magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and one with both. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated using κ coefficient (0-1). RESULTS: The mean age of patients was: 14.6 years; 60% were female and 53% had open physis. The interobserver reliability κ probabilities were 0.2 (CR), 0.13 (MRI) and 0.12 (CR and MRI). The intraobserver reliability κ probabilities were 0.45 (CR), 0.44 (MRI) and 0.65 (CR and MRI). CONCLUSION: The Dejour classification for trochlear dysplasia has slight interobserver reliability and substantial intraobserver reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

SECEC Didier Patte Prize 2023: the ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: The ABC classification has recently been proposed as a comprehensive classification system for posterior shoulder instability (PSI). The purpose of this study was to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the ABC classification. METHODS: All consecutive patients presenting with unidirectional PSI from June 2019 to June 2021 were included in a prospective study. No patients were excluded, leaving a consecutive series of 100 cases of PSI in 91 patients. All recorded clinical and imaging data were used to create anonymized clinical case vignettes, which were evaluated twice according to the ABC classification at the end of the recruitment period in random sequential order by 4 independent raters (2 experienced shoulder surgeons and 2 orthopedic residents) to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the ABC classification for PSI and to describe differences in characteristics among subtypes. Group A was defined as a first-time singular PSI event <3 months in the past regardless of etiology and is further subdivided into type 1 and type 2 depending on the occurrence of a subluxation (A1) or dislocation (A2). Group B comprises recurrent dynamic PSI regardless of time since onset and is further subdivided by the cause of instability into functional (B1) and structural (B2) dynamic PSI. Group C includes chronic static PSI with posterior humeral decentering that can be either constitutional (C1) or acquired (C2). RESULTS: None of the cases was deemed unsuitable to be classified based on the proposed system by the observers. After consensus agreement between the 2 expert raters, 16 cases were attributed to group A (8 type A1 and 8 type A2); 64, to group B (33 type B1 and 31 type B2); and 20, to group C (11 type C1 and 9 type C2). The expert raters agreed on the classification subtypes in 99% and 96% of the cases during the first rating and second rating, respectively (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.998 and 0.99, respectively). The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both raters. The beginners reached the same conclusion as the consensus agreement in 94% of the cases (ICC, 0.99) and 89% of the cases (ICC, 0.97) during the first round and 94% each (ICC, 0.97) during the second round. The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both beginners. Overall, discrepancies between raters were found between groups B1 and B2 (n = 14), groups B2 and C2 (n = 4), groups B1 and C1 (n = 1), and groups A1 and B2 (n = 1). In general, each subtype showed distinctive clinical and imaging characteristics that facilitated the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The presented ABC classification for PSI is a comprehensive classification with a high reliability and reproducibility. However, a gradual transition and potential progression between the subtypes of PSI must be considered. The reliable distinction between different subtypes of PSI based on etiology and pathomechanism provides a standardized basis for future investigations on treatment recommendations.

Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser's type â ¡ floating knee.

PURPOSE: The poor prognosis in patients with floating knee injuries is mainly contributed to articular involvement (Fraser's type Ⅱ). This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes among different Fraser's type Ⅱ floating knee injuries after surgical management. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with Fraser's type Ⅱ floating knee injuries (54 fractures) between September 2014 and December 2015 were enrolled prospectively in this study and were distributed according to Fraser's floating knee classification into three different groups as type ⅡA (ipsilateral femoral shaft and tibial intra-articular involvement, n = 11), type ⅡB (ipsilateral tibial shaft and femoral intra-articular involvement, n = 9) and type ⅡC (both femoral and tibial intra-articular involvement, n = 7). The differences among the groups were evaluated and compared. The functional outcomes of these injuries at one year were analyzed using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) which covers 5 subscales of pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and quality of life. The result was also compared with standardized age-sex matched healthy population using paired samples t-test. RESULTS: All the patients were male, and the injury mechanism was solely roadside accident. The mean age was 29.8 years and injury severity score 17.9 (comparable in all the three groups). Most injuries were observed on the right side (20 cases, 74.1%). Based on paired samples t-test, the KOOS score of patients with Fraser's type ⅡA was found to be better than that of type ⅡB and type ⅡC. Compared with the reference age-sex matched control group, patients with Fraser's type ⅡB and ⅡC fractures had significantly lower mean score in all KOOS subscales (all p < 0.01). However, Fraser's type ⅡA only revealed significant difference regarding the subscales of activities of daily living (p < 0.0001), sports and recreation (p < 0.0001), and quality of life (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with Fraser's type ⅡA fractures had a better functional outcome as compared to those with type ⅡB and ⅡC fractures. This might be due to the open intra-articular involvement of the distal femur of the latter two fracture types.

The Posterolateral Instability Score (PoLIS) of the knee joint: a guideline for standardized documentation, classification, and surgical decision-making.

PURPOSE: There has been a recent resurgence in interest in posterolateral instabilities of the knee joint. As this terminology comprises a large variety of pathologies, confusion and ambiguity in communication between surgeons and allied health professionals are generated. Consequently, accurate classification criteria are required to account for thorough preoperative diagnostics, surgical decision-making, and a standardized scientific documentation of injury severity. METHODS: A working group of five knee surgeons, who retrospect more than 2000 reconstructions of the posterolateral corner (PLC) at the minimum, was founded. An advanced PubMed search was conducted to identify key definitions. After defining an accurate diagnostic work-up, popular consensus was reached on definitions and covariates for a novel classification, rating of injury severity, and the resulting surgical decision-making. RESULTS: Three columns (lateral instability, cruciate ligament involvement, and relevant covariates), each ranging from A to D with increasing severity and assigning a number of points, were needed to meet the requirements. The generated terminology translated into the Posterolateral Instability Score (PoLIS) and the added number of points, ranging from 1 to 18, depicted the injury severity score. CONCLUSION: The presented classification may enable an objective assessment and documentation of the injury severity of the inherently complex pathology of injuries to the lateral side of the knee joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Development of a Core Set for Knee Dysfunction Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A Cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set for patients with knee dysfunction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted at all levels of care (general community, primary care units, rehabilitation clinics/centers, hospital). PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=388) with knee dysfunction with or without clinical diagnosis of knee pathology, with or without complaint of pain, with or without instability, and/or with or without knee movement restriction of any type. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were assessed using the core sets for acute and postacute musculoskeletal conditions, the subjective form from the International Knee Documentation Committee scale, the self-report of general health and functionality, and the general health and functionality classified by the researcher. To identify the categories that best explain knee dysfunction, linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four categories were identified from the 75 core set categories for acute and postacute musculoskeletal conditions. Eleven categories belong to the component body functions, 3 represent body structures, 7 represent activities and participation, and 3 represent environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: A core set for knee dysfunction that can be used at all levels of health care was proposed, which offers a system for disability assessment related to knee dysfunction, including environmental and social factors. These factors are important for a broad assessment because they include the multiple aspects of functionality, usually not considered in other knee dysfunction assessment instruments. Further analysis of the content and construct validity of the core set is required.

Imaging evaluation of traumatic carpal instability.

PURPOSE: To review the epidemiology, pertinent wrist anatomy, classification system, and emergent imaging evaluation of carpal instability with a focus on radiographic assessment of instability. METHODS: A review of current literature on carpal instability was performed with summary presentation of carpal instability epidemiology, carpal anatomy, imaging evaluation, and classification with imaging evaluation focused on diagnosis in the emergency setting. RESULTS: Carpal instability is a common pathology in falls on outstretched hand and is likely underdiagnosed due to instability being occult or demonstrating subtle malalignment on static imaging of the wrist. While there is a complex network of intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments contributing to carpal instability, a detailed knowledge of these ligaments is not necessary for radiologists to make an accurate diagnosis in the emergency setting, as identification and classification of carpal instability is based on identification of carpal malalignment patterns on radiography as opposed to identification of specific ligament injuries on advanced imaging. The Mayo classification is the most widely used classification system, which divides carpal instability into four categories: dissociative, non-dissociative, complex, and adaptive. Understanding this classification system allows radiologists to successfully classify almost all carpal instability injuries they will encounter, even in the setting of unusual or rare instability patterns. CONCLUSION: In working with the treating clinician, it is essential that the emergency radiologist is comfortable with identifying and classifying carpal instability. This will ensure prompt treatment of seemingly benign injuries and those that require intervention, surgical or otherwise, improving the likelihood of a good outcome.

The Bony Bankart: Clinical and Technical Considerations.

Fractures of the anteroinferior aspect of the glenoid rim, known as a bony Bankart lesions, can occur frequently in the setting of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. If these lesions are large and are left untreated in active patients, then recurrent glenohumeral instability due to glenoid bone deficiency may occur. Therefore, the clinician must recognize these lesions when they occur and provide appropriate treatment to restore physiological joint stability. This article aims to provide an overview focusing on clinical and technical considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of bony Bankart lesions.

Treatment Strategy for Impending Instability in Spinal Metastases.

BACKGROUD: Determining surgical management of a spinal metastasis is difficult owing to the involvement of multiple factors. The spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) system is a reliable tool to evaluate instability in spinal metastases. The intermediate SINS (scores 7-12) indicates impending instability, which makes it difficult to determine the proper treatment strategy. In this study, we aimed to compare the initial status and treatment outcomes of a conservative group versus an operative group among patients with spinal metastases with an intermediate SINS of 7-12. Further, we evaluated the time for conversion to surgery in patients who had initially undergone conservative treatment and identified the factors associated with the conversion. METHODS: Among the patients with a spinal metastasis with an intermediate SINS of 7-12 from May 2013 to December 2017, those who were followed up for more than 12 months were enrolled in this study. Patients with signs of a neurologic deficit or cord compression at the initial diagnosis were excluded. Finally, 79 patients (47 in the initially conservative group and 32 in the initially operative group) were enrolled in this study. The performance status, Tomita score, and Tokuhashi score were assessed for group comparison. Components of SINS, the Bilsky grade, and radiosensitivity of tumor were evaluated to determine factors associated with conversion to surgery. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 20.9 months (range, 12-46 months). The demographic variables, primary cancer type, and performance status were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, the Tomita score was lower in the initially operative group (p = 0.006). The 1-year treatment outcome assessed based on the change in performance status and vertebral height collapse showed a tendency to deteriorate less in the initially operative group. The rate of conversion to surgery in the initially conservative group was 33% in the first year, after which there was little change in the incidence of conversion. When vertebral body collapse was less than 50% or the tumor was located in the semi-rigid region (T3-T10), the need for conversion to surgery increased statistically significantly (p = 0.039 and p = 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of conversion to surgery in initially conservatively treated patients was about 33% in the first year. When a tumor is located in T3-T10 and less than 50% vertebral body collapse is present, surgery may be the better choice than conservative treatment.

Distraction index and Norberg angle to distinguish dysplastic and non-dysplastic hips based on FCI score.

OBJECTIVE: Radiographic hip scoring according to the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) and PennHIP (Pennsylvania Hip Improvement Program) method was performed with the purpose to compare the PennHIP and FCI results as well as coxofemoral joint laxity by correlation of Norberg angle and distraction index measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 167 dogs of various breeds presented for official screening examination in a veterinary teaching hospital in Germany were included. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best Norberg angle and distraction index cut-off values to distinguish between dysplastic and non-dysplastic groups based on FCI grades and to distinguish between lax and tight hip joints according to the PennHIP proposal were calculated. RESULTS: More than one third (38.2 %) of dogs that passed the breeding criterions according to FCI (grades A and B) were in the half of the population with lax hip joints and should not be used for breeding according to the PennHIP proposal. A cut-off value for the distraction index of 0.44 with sensitivity of 82.7 % and specificity of 84.2 % was superior to the best cut-off value for the Norberg angle at 101.8° with sensitivity of 82.7 % and specificity of 71.9 % to discriminate between non-dysplastic joints (A, B) and dysplastic joints (C, D, E). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results show a limited impact of laxity on the FCI grading. Breeding selection processes that are based on the FCI method could profit by an additional and complementary use of the distraction index.

Posterior Shoulder Instability Classification, Assessment, and Management: An International Delphi Study.

OBJECTIVE: To reach consensus among international shoulder experts on the most appropriate assessment and management strategies for posterior shoulder instability (PSI). DESIGN: Delphi. METHODS: In phase 1 of the study, we reviewed the literature, generated the Delphi items, created the survey, and identified clinical experts. In phase 2 of the study, clinical shoulder experts (physical therapists, orthopaedic surgeons, sports medicine physicians, and researchers) participated in a 3-round e-Delphi survey. For consensus, we required a minimum of 70% agreement per round. Descriptive statistics were used to present the characteristics of the respondents, the response rate of the experts in each round, and the consensus for PSI classification, assessment, and management. RESULTS: Round 3 was completed by 47 individuals from 5 different countries. The response rate ranged from 57/70 (81%) to 47/50 (94%) per round. Respondents agreed on 3 subgroups to define PSI: traumatic (100% agreement), microtraumatic (98% agreement), and atraumatic (98% agreement). CONCLUSION: International shoulder experts agreed that the clinical presentation, management strategy, and outcome expectations differ for traumatic, microtraumatic, and atraumatic PSI. Their recommendations provide a framework for managing these subgroups, with additional consideration of sport and work participation and subsequent risks. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(7):373-380. Epub 29 Apr 2020. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9225.

Quantitative assessments of static and dynamic balance performance in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) have postural-control deficits during center-of-pressure excursions than do healthy individuals. While an external analysis of center-of-pressure excursions in CAI has been performed, a quantitative analysis of center-of-gravity movements, to detect the balance deficits associated with CAI, has yet to be performed. Therefore, the aim of the study is to quantify the balance deficits in patients with unilateral CAI.Forty-four patients with unilateral CAI (24 men; age, 31.7 ±â€Š5.5 years) and 26 uninjured volunteers (12 men; age, 28.6 ±â€Š5.9 years) underwent Neurocom Balance Manager assessments of dynamic and static balance responses in limits of stability, unilateral stance, and forward lunge tests.In the limits of stability test, there were no significant group differences in the forward direction; however, reaction times were longer in the CAI group than in the control group in the backward (P = .037, effect size [ES] = 0.49) and rightward directions (P = .032, ES  = 0.47). Furthermore, the CAI group showed more excursions in the rightward (P = .046, ES = 0.50) and leftward directions (P = .002, ES = 0.80), and less directional control in the leftward direction (P = .036, ES = 0.59). In the unilateral stance test, the center of gravity sway velocity was faster in the CAI group than in the control group, whether eyes were opened or closed (P < .05). There were no significant group differences in forward lunge-test outcomes.Patients with CAI have poor static and dynamic balance performance compared to that in healthy counterparts. Thus, balance retraining should be an essential component of rehabilitation programs for patients with CAI.

Joint hypermobility in children: a neglected sign needing more attention.

Joint hypermobility refers to the ability that a joint has to move beyond its normal range of motion. It is common in the general population, particularly in children. While many individuals manifesting joint hypermobility are healthy, this feature can accompany a wide range of symptoms and systemic disorders, whose management can be influenced by their prompt recognition. Given the increasing attention that joint hypermobility is attracting in various fields of medicine, many practitioners are asked to approach more carefully joint hypermobility, in order to avoid over- and under-diagnosis of related disorders. Among the most common conditions featuring joint hypermobility there are hypermobility spectrum disorders and hereditary connective tissue disorders, in particular, the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. In children, joint hypermobility also accompany a variety of disorders affecting neurodevelopment. The nature of such an association is protean, as joint hypermobility may occur in selected congenital neuromuscular disorders, monogenic multiple malformation/intellectual disability syndromes, and well-known and emerging genomic syndromes. In addition, joint hypermobility seems strongly associated with developmental coordination disorders. This review offers an overview on definitions, assessment procedures, patterns of associated manifestations and disorders related to joint hypermobility, as well as treatment principles of associated musculoskeletal pain for practitioners that are not familial with this issue but encounter people featuring this physical attribute in their daily activity.

Neonatal hip ultrasound: tangent to lateral roof angle correlates better with stability than alpha angle according to Graf or percentage femoral head coverage.

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship of tangent to the lateral roof angle (TLRA), Graf's alpha angle and percentage femoral head cover (PHC) and to observed stability, and to establish intraobserver and interobserver errors for measurement of alpha angle and TLRA. In total, 2235 babies referred to the hip review clinic over a period of 8 years. Intraobserver and interobserver errors were calculated from readings of 383 hip images by an experienced paediatric radiologist and a trainee. Taking TLRA <70° as abnormal resulted in sensitivity for unstable right hips of 88% compared with 77% for alpha angle <60° (P = 0.002) and 81% for PHC <60% (P = 0.028) and specificity of TLRA 89%, alpha angle 90% (P = 0.07) and PHC 83% (P < 0.001). Corresponding figures for left hips are sensitivity of TLRA 99%, alpha angle 91% (P < 0.001) and PHC 96% (P = 0.013), and specificity TLRA 86%, alpha angle 83% (P = 0.001) and PHC 67% (P < 0.001). Mean intraobserver errors for alpha angle were 1.85° and 1.81° for consultant and trainee compared to 2.54 and 2.55 for TLRA. Mean interobserver errors were 2.22 for alpha angle and 3.42 for TLRA. TLRA, a new parameter, correlated better with observed stability with significant improvement in sensitivity in both hips and specificity in left hips compared with Graf's alpha angle, and significantly improved sensitivity and specificity in both hips compared with percentage femoral head cover.

Surgical outcomes in the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification system for shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: The Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) system was developed as a simple but reliable method for classifying shoulder instability based on 4 factors attainable by history and physical examination: frequency (solitary, occasional, or frequent); etiology (traumatic or atraumatic); direction (anterior, posterior, or inferior); and severity (subluxation or dislocation). This study investigated the epidemiology and 2-year surgical outcomes for the FEDS categories in the prospective Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort. METHODS: At the time of surgery, 1204 patients were assigned to the FEDS categories. Follow-up data were available for 636 of 734 patients (86.6%) who had undergone surgery at least 2 years prior to analysis. The most common categories were further analyzed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores) and rates of recurrent subluxation, recurrent dislocation, and revision surgery. RESULTS: Of the 36 FEDS categories, 16 represented at least 1% of patients. Occasional traumatic anterior dislocation (OTAD) was the most common category, with 16.4% of patients. Five other anterior categories (solitary traumatic anterior subluxation, occasional traumatic anterior subluxation [OTAS], frequent traumatic anterior subluxation [FTAS], solitary traumatic anterior dislocation, and frequent traumatic anterior dislocation) and one posterior category (solitary traumatic posterior subluxation [STPS]) represented at least 5% of patients. PROs improved significantly for each category. The highest rates of recurrent subluxation occurred in FTAS, OTAS, and OTAD cases; dislocation, OTAS and FTAS cases; and further surgery, OTAD cases. The lowest rates of failure occurred in STPS cases. Downward trends in PROs and higher failure rates were noted with an increasing number of preoperative dislocations. CONCLUSION: Different FEDS categories showed varying degrees of improvement and failure rates, indicating that the system can be used to provide prognostic insight for presurgical education. Overall, outcomes decreased with a higher number of preoperative dislocations.

Global Perspectives on Management of Shoulder Instability: Decision Making and Treatment.

The glenohumeral joint is prone to instability. Patients with instability should have a physical examination. Imaging studies can provide additional information. Classification schemes that into account soft tissue pathology, neuromuscular control, bone loss, and activity level. An arthroscopic Bankart repair is the mainstay for unidirectional instability. Bone block procedures are indicated for patients with bone loss or a failed attempt at stabilization surgery. The arthroscopic Latarjet is a promising option for these patients. For patients with multidirectional instability, prolonged rehabilitation is indicated, followed by capsular plication or inferior capsular shift if instability is unresponsive to physical therapy.

Three Key Findings When Diagnosing Shoulder Multidirectional Instability: Patient Report of Instability, Hypermobility, and Specific Shoulder Tests.

Shoulder instability has varying mechanisms of injury, direction, and severity. Classification systems based on clustering signs and symptoms have been developed to define subgroups of shoulder instability. Despite this attempt at homogeneity, multidirectional instability (MDI) suffers from the same lack of diagnostic clarity as low back pain. In this Viewpoint, the authors outline 3 key areas to address when diagnosing MDI: patient interview, medical comorbidities, and specific shoulder tests and measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(2):52-54. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.0602.

The Oswestry-Bristol Classification.

AIMS: Trochlear dysplasia is a significant risk factor for patellofemoral instability. The Dejour classification is currently considered the standard for classifying trochlear dysplasia, but numerous studies have reported poor reliability on both plain radiography and MRI. The severity of trochlear dysplasia is important to establish in order to guide surgical management. We have developed an MRI-specific classification system to assess the severity of trochlear dysplasia, the Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC). This is a four-part classification system comprising normal, mild, moderate, and severe to represent a normal, shallow, flat, and convex trochlear, respectively. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the OBC and compare it with that of the Dejour classification. METHODS: Four observers (two senior and two junior orthopaedic surgeons) independently assessed 32 CT and axial MRI scans for trochlear dysplasia and classified each according to the OBC and the Dejour classification systems. Assessments were repeated following a four-week interval. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined by using Fleiss' generalization of Cohen's kappa statistic and S-statistic nominal and linear weights. RESULTS: The OBC showed fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intraobserver agreement (mean kappa 0.68). The Dejour classification showed poor interobserver agreement and fair-to-good intraobserver agreement (mean kappa 0.52). CONCLUSION: The OBC can be used to assess the severity of trochlear dysplasia. It can be applied in clinical practice to simplify and standardize surgical decision-making in patients with recurrent patella instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):102-107.

Return to play after surgery for isolated unstable syndesmotic ankle injuries (West Point grade IIB and III) in 110 male professional football players: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate time to return to play following surgical stabilisation of isolated unstable syndesmosis injuries in a cohort of professional male football players. METHODS: All professional football players undergoing surgery for isolated unstable syndesmosis injury (West Point grade ≥IIB) at a specialised Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital were followed up until return to play (minimum ≥6 months). Players with a stable syndesmosis, injuries older than 6 weeks, concomitant medial or lateral malleolar fracture or previous ankle surgery were excluded. During rehabilitation, time required to return to sports-specific rehabilitation, team training and first match play, were recorded. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2017, a total of 110 male professional football players were included. The mean time required to begin on field rehabilitation was 37±12 days, while the mean time to return to team training was 72±28 days. The first official match was played on average 103±28 days postoperatively. Multivariable analysis revealed that the severity of injury, the concomitant presence of talar cartilage injury and the age of the player were significantly associated (p<0.00001) with time to return to on field rehabilitation, team training and match play. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of professional football players, surgical stabilisation of isolated unstable syndesmosis injuries (West Point grade ≥IIB) allowed for relatively quick return to play. High grade injury (West Point grade III), concomitant cartilage injury and greater age were associated with longer return to play times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Longitudinal observational cohort study (level II).

Scoring system for optimal management of acute traumatic patellar dislocation: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: In first-time acute traumatic patellar dislocations, numerous anatomic and clinical factors are complicatedly associated and should be comprehensively considered for the optimal management of conservative or surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to establish a scoring system, using a concept that is not complicated and easily used in clinic. METHODS: Of 131 first-time acute traumatic patellar dislocations, 81 patients (51 females, 30 males) with an average age of 19.6 (95%CI, 17.5-21.6) years and an average follow-up duration of 17.1 (95% CI, 12.3-21.9) months, who underwent conservative treatment after first-time dislocations, were reviewed. Based on the odds ratios applying logistic regression analysis, the scoring system was established. RESULTS: The scoring system (total: 10 points) had simple composition of age <20 (2 points), sports injury (1 points), hemarthrosis (1 points), and image findings of a bony fragment (3 points), lateral shift of the patella (1 points), and trochlear dysplasia (2 points). A threshold score of 6.5 was determined using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.893 (p < 0.0001). In logistic regression analysis, a score of ≥7 was shown to be a dominant factor for recurrence (OR = 27.1, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the association between the score and recurrence risk was as follows: a score of ≤4 = low risk (1/21 cases, 5%); a score of 5-7 = medium risk (13/27 cases, 48%); a score of ≥8 = high risk (30/33 cases, 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the simple scoring system, patients who scored ≥8 were considered suitable for surgical treatment because of the high rate of recurrence, whereas those who scored ≤4 were considered suitable for conservative treatment because of the low rate of recurrence.

Early stage and small medial osteochondral lesions of the talus in the presence of chronic lateral ankle instability: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI), the instability of the ankle joint results in repeated microtrauma to the articular cartilage. How the lesion condition or stage is affected by the presence of lateral instability in medial osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) is unclear. We aimed to examine whether CLAI is associated with the size and staging of medial OLT on radiographs, magnetic resonance (MR) images, and arthroscopy. METHODS: Forty-five patients with medial OLTs in 45 ankles were reviewed. Radiographs were assessed for damage and lesion classification. The tibio-talar tilting angle (TTA) was measured. The patients were divided into two groups: the CLAI group and the stable group. The lesion classification on radiographs, MR images, and arthroscopy, and size on MR images were statistically compared. RESULTS: The CLAI group had a mean TTA of 8.15 ± 3.41°, whereas the stable group had a mean TTA of 2.24 ± 1.64°. The CLAI group had a lower clinical score than the stable group at the initial visit to our clinic. The CLAI group presented with lesions of significantly shorter longitudinal and transverse diameters. Stages of medial OLT on radiographs, MR images, and arthroscopic evaluation were earlier in the CLAI group than those in the stable group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLAI presented in the early stages of OLT and had significantly smaller lesions than those without CLAI. The patients without CLAI may be selected for surgery at an early phase.