Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser treatment in ophthalmology: a review of the most common procedures Capsulotomy and Iridotomy.

Nowadays, lasers are used in various medical fields. Ophthalmology was the first medical specialty to utilize lasers in patient treatment and still remains the leading medical field that uses laser energy for both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. The neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd: YAG) laser is one of the most common lasers used in ophthalmology. It is a solid-state laser with a wavelength of 1064 nm that works on the principle of photodisruption. Since its introduction in ophthalmology over 40 years ago, it has found various applications, mainly for procedures where cutting or disruption of ocular tissue is required. Compared to surgical alternatives, the use of Nd: YAG lasers on ocular tissue is minimally invasive. In this review, we focus on the two most common ophthalmic applications of Nd: YAG laser - laser peripheral iridotomy and posterior capsulotomy. The history of the techniques, current trends, potential complications, and the prognosis for future use is discussed.

Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcomes of Pupillary Block Glaucoma Following Vitreoretinal Surgery.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of pupillary block glaucoma (PBG) following vitreoretinal surgery (VR surgery). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 6941 patients, who underwent VR surgery at a tertiary eye care centre in South India between January 2015 and December 2019. Amongst them, clinical data of 61 patients who developed PBG were taken for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age was 53.90 (13.4) years and the incidence of PBG was .87%. Median (IQR) time of onset of PBG following VR surgery was 3.33 (1.1-6.6) months and majority were pseudophakic (75%). PBG resolved with Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) alone in 50 (82%) patients, whereas 11(18%) patients required additional interventions like surgical iridectomy, trabeculectomy or diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) either as a stand-alone procedure or in combination with silicone oil removal (SOR). Mean (SD) intraocular pressure at the onset of PBG was 41.61 (14.5) mmHg, which reduced drastically following LPI to 24.28 (14.9) mmHg which further dropped significantly at 6 months follow up to 20.34 (13.9) mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of secondary PBG after VR surgery was .87%, and we observed diabetes mellitus, combined cataract and VR surgery, use of 1000cs SO endotamponade, intraoperative endolaser and multiple VR surgical interventions as common associations. Majority of the patients with PBG after VR procedures resolved with LPI and medical management. Few individuals (18%) required additional laser or surgical intervention for IOP control.

Treat the individual and not the angle.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma, the silent thief of sight, is one of the most common vision-threatening conditions. Even though POAG (primary open angle glaucoma) is more common, PACG (primary angle closure glaucoma) is the dreaded variant. ISGEO (International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology) has classified primary angle closure as PACS (primary angle closure suspect), PAC (primary angle closure), and PACG (primary angle closure glaucoma. The inconspicuous nature of PACS makes its diagnosis and treatment very tricky. PURPOSE: To determine which cases are best suited for laser peripheral iridotomy. SYNOPSIS: Laser peripheral iridotomy is the gold standard for acute primary angle closure glaucoma treatment. But there is a lot of confusion regarding its use in PACS as a prophylactic measure. We have tried to throw light on laser peripheral iridotomy, a much debatable topic. The video focuses on various trials regarding laser peripheral iridotomy, the indications, side effects, and contraindications. We have also discussed its use as a therapeutic and prophylactic procedure. HIGHLIGHTS: The video highlights that the approach of laser peripheral iridotomy should be on a case-by-case basis. VIDEO LINK: https://youtu.be/kiEYI9ct2Oo.

Intraocular Pressure While Using Gonioscopy, SLT, and Laser Iridotomy Lenses: An Ex Vivo Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation while applying standard gonioscopy, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), and laser iridotomy procedural lenses. Methods: Twelve cadaver eyes were mounted to a custom apparatus and cannulated with a pressure transducer which measured IOP. The apparatus was mounted to a load cell which measured the force on the eye. Six ophthalmologists performed simulated gonioscopy (Sussman 4 mirror lens), SLT (Latina lens), and laser iridotomy (Abraham lens) while a computer recorded IOP (mm Hg) and force (grams). The main outcome measures were IOP and force applied to the eye globe during ophthalmic diagnostics and procedures. Results: The average IOP's during gonioscopy, SLT, and laser iridotomy were 43.2 ± 16.9 mm Hg, 39.8 ± 9.9 mm Hg, and 42.7 ± 12.6 mm Hg, respectively. The mean force on the eye for the Sussman, Latina, and Abraham lens was 40.3 ± 26.4 grams, 66.7 ± 29.8 grams, and 65.5 ± 35.9 grams, respectively. The average force applied to the eye by the Sussman lens was significantly lower than both the Latina lens (P = 0.0008) and the Abraham lens (P = 0.001). During gonioscopy indentation, IOP elevated on average to 80.5 ± 22.6 mm Hg. During simulated laser iridotomy tamponade, IOP elevated on average to 82.3 ± 27.2 mm Hg. Conclusions: In cadaver eyes, the use of standard ophthalmic procedural lenses elevated IOP by approximately 20 mm Hg above baseline.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Prophylactic Laser Peripheral Iridotomy for Primary Angle Closure Suspects.

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-utility of prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) for primary angle closure (PAC) suspects (PACS). DESIGN: Economic evaluation. METHODS: Our Markov model randomized PACS eyes to LPI or observation for 40 one-year cycles (100,000 iterations per strategy). Each cycle, an eye remained in its current health state, advanced linearly through PAC, mild, moderate, severe, and end-stage PAC glaucoma (PACG), or died. Transition rates were derived from the literature including the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention (ZAP) trial and the Singapore Asymptomatic Narrow Angles Laser Iridotomy Study (ANA-LIS). Eyes with acute-angle closure advanced to either PAC or directly to various PACG severities. A tracker monitored accumulated perimetric decibel reduction to progress PACG through increasing severities, with an annual probability of either stable or severity-dependent perimetry loss. We set a willingness to pay of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) <$50,000/quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: At age 50 years, LPI was cost-saving using ZAP data and cost-effective using ANA-LIS data. The ZAP iterations became cost-effective from the societal perspective when the model started at age 55 years and third-party perspective at age 70 years. LPI was no longer cost-effective from the societal perspective using ANA-LIS data at age 80 years or from the societal perspective using ZAP data or third-party perspective with ANA-LIS data at age 85. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses favored LPI until starting age 85. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic LPI for PACS is cost-effective across a spectrum of ages and should be considered from a public health perspective.

Outcome of combined cataract surgery and iris prosthesis implantation in iris melanoma patients previously treated with iridocyclectomy: A national retrospective non-comparative case series.

PURPOSE: To examine complications, visual outcomes, photic patient-reported symptoms, corneal morphology, IOL tilt, and intraocular pressure after implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) and iris prosthesis (IP) following iridocyclectomy. METHODS: Patients with previous iridocyclectomy treated with an IOL and IP at the Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet between 2007 and 2018 were included in this national retrospective non-comparative case series. The assessment encompassed BCVA, PRO questionnaire, corneal topography, and anterior segment OCT. RESULTS: 45 patients were included. Eight of 45 patients were previously treated with ruthenium-106 brachytherapy in conjunction with iridocyclectomy. Six of 45 patients developed endothelial dysfunction four of whom had received ruthenium-106 brachytherapy. Five of 45 patients had subluxation of the IOL/IP complex due to incomplete zonula apparatus. BCVA improved for all patients after lens surgery. 26 patients participated in the invited follow-up examination. 19 of 26 (73%) reported none or mild photic symptoms after IP instalment. Five (19%) reported ongoing severe photic symptoms. The corneal astigmatism significantly increased after iridocyclectomy but did not change after lens surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an IOL and IP is a safe procedure, alleviating photic symptoms in most patients. It comes with higher risk of complications due to a more demanding procedure and larger surgical traumas from previous treatments. Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy increases the complication risk. Corneal astigmatism is induced by iridocyclectomy but does not change after lens surgery.

Dysphotopsia and location of laser iridotomy: a systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to clarify the relationship between the location of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), a common procedure to prevent or treat angle-closure glaucoma, and the incidence of post-procedure visual disturbances known as dysphotopsias. Understanding this relationship is crucial due to the high frequency of LPIs performed and the significant impact dysphotopsia can have on vision and quality of life. Articles investigating the relationship between LPI location and dysphotopsia in at least five patients were identified via a literature search of OVID MEDLINE (1946-November 19, 2022) and EMBASE (1946-November 19, 2022). Non-comparative and non-English studies were excluded. Studies did not require a control group to be included. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool were used to appraise included studies. Our review included three studies encompassing 1756 eyes from 878 patients. The location of LPI was grouped into superior (604 patients, 889 eyes), inferior (150 patients, 150 eyes), and nasal/temporal (443 patients, 717 eyes). The analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of any new dysphotopsia types among the location groups post-LPI. Overall, the incidence of lines, ghost images, and blurring significantly increased after LPI, while halos and glare significantly decreased. In conclusion, the current literature suggests that the location of LPI has no significant relationship to the types and rates of dysphotopsia experienced thereafter. While there is a 2-3% risk of linear dysphotopsia after LPI regardless of location, LPI may also resolve pre-existing halos and glare.

Progressive Changes in the Anterior Segment and Their Impact on the Anterior Chamber Angle in Primary Angle Closure Disease.

PURPOSE: To investigate longitudinal changes in the anterior segment (AS) using serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and determine the impact of these changes on the anterior chamber angle (ACA) in eyes with primary angle closure disease (PACD) treated with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. METHODS: This study included 103 patients with PACD who underwent LPI and were followed up by a mean 6.7 ± 1.7 AS-OCT examinations for a mean 6.5 ± 2.9 years. Temporal changes in AS-OCT parameters, including anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle opening distance (AOD750), angle recess area (ARA750), iris thickness (IT750), lens vault (LV), and pupil diameter (PD), were analyzed by multivariate linear mixed effects models (LMEMs). RESULTS: Multivariate LMEMs showed that decrease in AOD750 was not significant (-1.59 µm/y, P = .222); however, ARA750 decreased over time (-2.3 × 103 µm2/y, P = .033) and SSA showed marginal significance (-0.20°/y, P = .098), and LV increased significantly (11.6 µm/y, P < .001) after LPI. Mean LV change was negatively associated with AOD750, ARA750, and SSA, whereas PD was negatively associated with ARA750 (P < .001 each). PD decreased with aging (-13.7 µm/y, P = .036), accompanied by thinning of IT750 (-1.7 µm/y, P = .063). CONCLUSIONS: LV tends to increase with aging, which contributes to the shallowing of the anterior chamber and narrowing of ACA in PACD eyes treated with LPI. In the meantime, pupillary constriction and subsequent peripheral iris thinning associated with aging could possibly offset the effect of ACA narrowing.

Glaucoma de ângulo fechado devido a síndrome de íris em platô / Primary angle closure glaucoma due to plateau íris syndrome

Resumo Objetivo: Descrever um caso de glaucoma de ângulo fechado devido a síndrome de íris em platô. Descrição do caso: Paciente do sexo feminino, de 50 anos de idade, que há 13 meses foi tratada de fechamento angular primário a esquerda com sucesso com iridotomia periféria com Nd:YAG laser, compareceu ao serviço com queixa de embaçamento visual e dor intermitentes no olho esquerdo. Ao exame, observou-se fechamento angular à esquerda que se desfazia à gonioscopia de identação e pressão intraocular (PIO) de 16 e 42mmHg. O exame do ângulo da câmara anterior pela tomografia de coerência óptica evidenciou iridotomia patente em ambos os olhos e à esquerda o fechamento aposicional. Pelo estudo das imagens do ângulo foi possível identificar a configuração íris em platô, caracterizando a síndrome de íris em platô à esquerda. Foi procedida a goniosplastia com laser de argônio em ambos os olhos, o que permitiu a correção da configuração da íris e controle da PIO. Após o tratamento, foi realizado exame de campo visual que foi normal à direita e à esquerda identificou escotoma arqueado superior. O fundo de olho mostrou disco óptico normal a direita (0,2),e glaucomatoso à esquerda (0,6). Um ano após a gonioplastia, a acuidade visual foi de 20/30 sem correção por ambos os olhos, PIO de 12 e 13mmHg, sem medicações, com fundo de olho e campos visuais inalterados. Conclusão: A configuração íris em platô deve sempre ser considerada frente a casos de fechamento angular primário, sendo a tomografia de coerência óptica valiosa ferramenta para corroborar no seu diagnóstico.

Abstract Objective: To present a case of closed-angle glaucoma due to Plateau iris syndrome. Case Description: Female Patient, 50 years old, that 13 months ago was treated for primary angular closure to the left successfully with iridotomy with Nd: YAG Laser. She attended the service complaining of visual haze and intermittent pain in the left eye. On examination, it was observed angle closure in the left that could be openned with identation. Intraocular pressure (IOP) of 16 and 42mmHg respectively. The examination of the anterior chamber angle by optical coherence tomography showed patent iridotomy in both eyes and on the left the apositional angle closure. By studying the angle images it was possible to identify plaeau iris configuration, characterizing the iris syndrome of plateau iris. Gonioplasty with argon laser was performed in both eyes, which allowed the correction of iris configuration and control of IOP. After treatment, visual field examination was performed, which was normal to the right and to the left identified superior arcuate scotoma. The Fundus showed a normal right optical disc (0.2), and glaucomatous left (0.6). One year after gonioplasty, visual acuity was 20/30 without correction by both eyes, PIO of 12 and 13mmHg, without medications, with unaltered visual fields and optic discs. Conclusion: The Iris configuration in Plateau should always be considered in front of cases of primary angle closure, being the optical coherence tomography valuable tool to corroborate in its diagnosis.

Opciones quirúrgicas en el cierre angular primario por iris en meseta / Surgical options for the primary angle closure in a plateau iris case

Se describen dos casos clínicos (hermanos), con el objetivo de mostrar diferentes opciones terapéuticas en el glaucoma por cierre angular primario por iris en meseta. El primer caso representa una paciente femenina con antecedentes de iris en meseta e iridectomía periférica quirúrgica, quien presentaba cifras de tensión intraocular elevadas y progresión del daño glaucomatoso, por lo que se decidió realizar trabeculectomía en ambos ojos, con evolución satisfactoria. El segundo caso se trata de un paciente masculino, con antecedentes de salud, quien acudió por molestias oculares. Tras examen físico oftalmológico se constató glaucoma por cierre angular por iris en meseta, con presión intraocular elevada y opacidad del cristalino asociada, por lo que se realizó trabeculectomía en ojo derecho más extracción del cristalino en ambos ojos. Como complicaciones posoperatorias presentó desprendimiento coroideo y edema macular, resueltos con tratamiento médico. La trabeculectomía luego de la extracción del cristalino en ojo derecho falló, por lo que actualmente se encuentra compensado con tratamiento médico. La elección de la terapéutica adecuada debe tener en cuenta los factores fisiopatológicos involucrados y la forma de presentación(AU)

Different therapeutic options for the primary angle closure glaucoma by plateau iris were described in two clinical cases. The first one was a female patient with a a history of plateau iris and peripheral iridectomy. Elevation of intraocular pressure and progression to glaucoma was confirmed, so it was decided to perform trabeculectomy in both eyes and the result was satisfactory. The second case was a male patient with history of health problems, who suffered with eye disturbances. After ophthalmological exam, a primary angle closure glaucoma caused by plateau iris was confirmed with marked eye hypertension and associated crystalline lens opacity. Trabeculectomy of right eye and lens extraction in both eyes was applied. Choroidal detachment and macular edema were the postoperative complications, but the medical treatment managed to solve this situation. After the lens extraction, trabeculectomy in the right eye failed and today it is compensated with medical treatment. The right therapeutic choice should take into consideration the physiopathologic factors and the form of presentation(AU)

Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes / Mecanismos de fechamento angular sem bloqueio pupilar: análise de prevalência e resultados terapêuticos

Purpose: To assess the prevalence and treatment outcomes of angle-closure mechanisms other than pupillary block in a population of Brazilian patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients who had undergone laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) due to occludable angles at a single institution between July 2009 and April 2012. An occludable angle was defined as an eye in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible for ≥180° on dark-room gonioscopy. Key exclusion criteria were any form of secondary glaucoma and the presence of >90° of peripheral anterior synechiae. Collected data were age, race, gender, angle-closure mechanism (based on indentation goniocopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications and subsequent management during follow-up. If both eyes were eligible, the right eye was arbitrarily selected for analysis. Results: A total of 196 eyes of 196 consecutive patients (mean age 58.3 ± 11.6 years) who underwent LPI were included. In most of the patients [86% (169 patients; 133 women and 36 men]), LPI sucessfully opened the angle. Mean IOP was reduced from 18.3 ± 6.4 mmHg to 15.4 ± 4.5 mmHg after LPI (p<0.01). Among the 27 patients with persistent occludable angles, the most common underlying mechanisms were plateau iris (56%) and lens-induced component (34%). Most of these patients (85%) were treated with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI); approximately 90% showed non-occludable angles following the laser procedure (mean IOP reduction of 18.9%), with no significant differences between patients with plateau iris and lens-induced components (p=0.34; mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 3.6 months). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, in this population of Brazilian patients, several eyes with angle closure were not completely treated with LPI. In the present large case series involving middle-age patients, plateau iris was the ...

Objetivo: Reportar a prevalência e os resultados terapêuticos em casos de fechamento angular por outros mecanismos além de bloqueio pupilar em uma população de pacientes brasileiros. Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo para avaliar pacientes apresentando ângulo oclusível submetidos à iridotomia periférica a laser (LPI), em uma única instituição, entre julho/2009 e abril/2012. Ângulo oclusível foi definido pela não observação do trabeculado posterior em mais de 180° à gonioscopia sem identação. Olhos com glaucomas secundários ou >90º de sinéquia anterior periférica foram excluídos. Foram coletados os seguintes dados: idade, raça, sexo, mecanismo de fechamento angular (com base na gonioscopia e biomicroscopia ultrassônica), pressão intraocular (PIO), número de medicações antiglaucomatosas e manejo subsequente durante o seguimento. Sempre que ambos os olhos eram elegíveis, o olho direito foi escolhido arbitrariamente para análise. Resultados: Foram incluídos 196 olhos de 196 pacientes (58,3 ± 11,6 anos) que foram submetidos à LPI. Na maioria dos casos [86% (169 pacientes; 133 mulheres e 36 homens), a LPI foi capaz de abrir o ângulo. A PIO média foi reduzida de 18,3 ± 6,4 para 15,4 ± 4,5 mmHg após a LPI (p<0,01). Entre os 27 casos que persistiram com ângulo oclusível, os mecanismos mais comuns envolvidos foram íris em platô (56%) e induzido por componente cristaliniano (34%). A maioria desses casos (85%) foram tratados com iridoplastia periférica a laser (ALPI). Aproximadamente 90% tornaram-se não oclusíveis após a ALPI (redução média da PIO de 18,9%), não havendo diferença significativa entre os pacientes com componentes de íris em platô ou cristaliniano (p=0,34; seguimento médio de 11,4 ± 3,6 meses). Conclusões: Nossos resultados sugerem que, nessa população de pacientes brasileiros, parte dos olhos com fechamento angular não foi completamente tratada com LPI. Nesta série de pacientes de meia-idade, a presença de íris em ...

Cierre angular agudo bilateral inducido por benzodiazepinas / Bilateral acute angle closure induced by benzodiazepins

El cierre angular agudo o glaucoma agudo como es conocido mundialmente es un cuadro clínico característico producido por un cierre angular brusco, constituye una urgencia oftalmológica que pone en peligro la función visual si no es resuelto satisfactoriamente en las primeras horas de instaurado. El mecanismo fisiopatológico más frecuente es el bloqueo pupilar primario y el tratamiento de elección es la iridotomía láser periférica. Se debe realizar el diagnóstico diferencial con el bloqueo pupilar secundario y con otras causas sin bloqueo pupilar en las que la iridotomía no es suficiente. El cierre angular agudo es generalmente unilateral aunque se puede presentar de forma bilateral desencadenado por el empleo de drogas que producen dilatación pupilar como en el caso clínico que se describe a continuación

The acute angle closure or acute glaucoma as it is worldwide known is a characteristic clinical picture that is caused by sudden angle closure, It represents ophthalmological emergency that endangers the visual function if not satisfactorily solved in the first hours of occurrence. The most frequent physiopathological mechanism is primary pupil blocking and the treatment of choice is peripheral laser iridotomy. The differential diagnosis must be made with the secondary pupil blocking and with other causes without pupil blocking in which iridotomy is not enough. The acute angular closure is generally unilateral, although it may appear bilaterally and be caused by the use of drugs that give rise to pupil dilation like the clinical case which was described here

Síndrome de Íris Plateau: relato de 17 casos / Iris Plateau syndrome: case report of 17 cases

Objetivo: Relatar 17 casos diagnosticados como Síndrome da Íris Plateau (17 olhos), enfocando a apresentação clínica, abordagem diagnóstica e conduta. Métodos: Os pacientes foram diagnosticados como Síndrome de Íris Plateau, baseado nos exames de gonioscopia e biomicroscopia ultra-sônica (UBM), realizados após a iridectomia a laser. Todos os pacientes foram acompanhados por um período de tempo médio de 46,7 + 11,7 meses. Aforma completa da síndrome foi determinada pela presença de crise congestiva recidiva ou teste da prono-posição em quarto escuro positivo. Resultados: No primeiro grupo, oito olhos se apresentaram na primeira consulta com glaucoma agudo. Dois destes olhos apresentaram teste provocativo positivo (2) após a iridectomia e seis deles apresentaramcrise congestiva recidiva durante o tempo de seguimento - síndrome da íris em Plateau completa. No segundo grupo, nove olhos não apresentaram glaucoma agudo, antes ou após a iridectomia, e devido aos achados nos exames de gonioscopia e UBM foram diagnosticados como portadores do mecanismo da íris em Plateau – possíveis casos de síndrome da íris em Plateau incompleta. Mesmo após a realização da iridectomia,dois olhos do segundo grupo apresentaram progressão das sinéquias anteriores periféricas (SAP). Conclusão: Casos de síndrome da íris em Plateau podem evoluir apresentando crise congestiva recidiva e/ou progressão das SAP. A gonioscopia sempre deve ser realizada após a iridectomia a laser a fim de verificar a eficácia do procedimento em abrir o ângulo irido-corneano. Entretanto, estudos prospectivos longitudinais são ecessários para determinar quais os fatores de risco relacionados ao processo de fechamento angularsecundário ao mecanismo da íris em Plateau.

Objective: To report 17 cases of Plateau Iris Syndrome (17 eyes) focusing on clinical presentation, diagnosis approach and treatment. Methods: All patients were diagnosed as iris Plateau syndrome cases based on gonioscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) exam findings, performed after laser iridectomy. The mean follow up time was 46,7 + 11,7 months. The completeform of the syndrome was determined by the presence of recurrent acute angle closure episode or a positive darkroom prone position test. Results: In the first group, eight eyes had an acute angle closure episode at the time of thefirst evaluation. Two of them had a positive dark room prone position test even after iridotomy and six of themhad a recurrent acute angle closure episode during the follow-up period - complete plateau iris syndrome cases.In the second group, nine eyes that did not have an acute attack before or after iridotomy were included. All of themhad gonioscopy and UBM findings compatible with plateau iris mechanisms – possible incomplete plateau iris syndrome cases. We observe progression of peripheralanterior synechiae (PAS) in two eyes of the second group even after iridotomy. Conclusion: Plateau iris syndromecases may develop recurrent acute angle closure episodes and/or further PAS formation. The gonioscopy exam must always be performed after the iridotomy in order to verify the opening of the irido-corneal angle. Further studies should address the risk factors related to the maintenance of the angle closure process even after iridotomy.