RESUMO
Background: This case report describes a novel endovascular technique for treating superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion, a condition leading to chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Traditional treatment methods for CMI, primarily due to SMA stenosis, are often complex and risky, particularly for patients unsuitable for conventional surgery. Objective: This study details the application of retrograde recanalization followed by the deployment of a VIABAHN covered stent in a patient with complete SMA ostium occlusion. Methods: The procedure's success in re-establishing mesenteric blood flow demonstrates its potential as a less invasive, safer alternative to traditional surgical approaches. This technique's innovation lies in its retrograde approach, allowing for effective treatment in cases where antegrade access is unfeasible. Results: The patient showed significant symptom improvement without procedural complications, underscoring the method's efficacy and safety. Conclusion: These findings suggest that retrograde stent implantation can be a viable option for managing SMA occlusions, especially in high-risk surgical cases. The successful application of this technique in this case contributes to the evolving landscape of endovascular interventions in vascular surgery and offers a promising direction for future research and clinical practice in treating SMA-related conditions.
Assuntos
Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Stents , Humanos , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Circulação Esplâncnica , Masculino , Desenho de Prótese , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mesenteric ischemia (Me-Is) after cardiac surgery is underreported in present literature but has still earned the bad reputation of a dismal prognosis. This study adds clinical outcomes in a large patient cohort. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019 of the 22,590 patients undergoing cardiac surgery at our facility 106 (0.47%) developed Me-Is postoperatively. Retrospective patient data was analyzed. Additionally, patients were stratified by outcome-survivors and nonsurvivors. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (n = 68, 64.2%), mean age was 71.2 ± 9.3 years. Most procedures were elective (n = 85, 80.2%) and comprised of more complex combined procedures (50.9%) and redos (17.9%). Mean EuroSCORE II averaged 10.9 ± 12.2%. Survival at 30 days was 49.1% (n = 52). Clinical baseline and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between survivors and nonsurvivors. The median postoperative interval until symptom onset was 5 days in both groups. Survivors were more frequently diagnosed by computed tomography and nonsurvivors based on clinical symptoms. Me-Is was predominantly nonocclusive (n = 84, 79.2%). Laparotomy was the main treatment in both groups (n = 45, 78.8% vs. n = 48, 88.9%, p = 0.94). Predictors of mortality were maximum norepinephrine doses (hazard ratio [HR] 8.29, confidence interval [CI] 3.39-20.26, p < 0.0001), lactate levels (HR 1.06, CI 1.03-1.09), and usage of inotropes (HR 2.46, CI 1.41-4.30). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of Me-Is following cardiac surgery is poor-independently from diagnostic or treatment patterns. There exists a significant asymptomatic time period postoperatively, in which pathophysiologic processes seem to cross the Rubicon. After clinical demarcation, the further course can almost no longer be influenced.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Isquemia Mesentérica , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiologia , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was performed to summarize our experience in treating acute superior mesenteric artery embolism (SMAE) by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT). METHODS: Between January 2023 and October 2023, 18 patients presenting with acute mesenteric ischemia were admitted to our center, including 11 cases of SMAE, 3 cases of superior mesenteric artery thrombosis, and 4 cases of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. We retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (4 males and 4 females; range, 51-79 years; mean, 62.50 ± 9.67 years) who underwent treatment of acute SMAE using the AcoStream system. The patients had no obvious evidence of intestinal necrosis as shown by peritoneal puncture or computed tomography. Thrombectomy was performed on the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using an 8F AcoStream thrombus aspiration system (Acotec, China). The demographics, risk factors, therapeutic effect, complications, mortality, and follow-up of the study population were assessed. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. After 1-3 passes (2.38 ± 0.92) and aspiration thrombectomy, complete thrombus removal was achieved in 7 (87.50%) patients. One patient received an adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis due to partial thrombus removal. Thrombolysis was conducted for 2 days, resulting in complete resolution of the thrombus. The other 7 patients did not receive adjunctive endovascular intervention due to complete thrombus removal and no residual stenosis. No distal embolization or device-related complications were noted during the procedure. After the procedure, sufficient clinical improvement was seen in 6 patients within 1-2 days. Two patients showed no significant improvement of their symptoms. Laparotomy was performed on day 1 and day 2 after thrombectomy in patients 3 and 7, respectively. Intestinal necrosis was diagnosed operatively and intestinal resection was performed. All patients were discharged 6-15 days (9.50 ± 3.07) after admission without perioperative complication or death. The mean follow-up period was 5.00 ± 3.30 months (range, 1-10 months), and the follow-up rate was 100%. During the follow-up, all patients remained symptom-free. Computed tomography angiography images showed good flow in the trunk and branches of the SMA in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: PMT using the AcoStream system is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective technique for acute SMAE. Early application of PMT can achieve immediate revascularization of the SMA and have the potential advantage of avoiding laparotomy or reducing the extension of enterectomy, as it could theoretically restore intestinal perfusion in less time than open revascularization. If the symptoms do not improve after PMT, exploratory laparotomy should be scheduled as soon as possible. Further studies are necessary on this field to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Trombectomia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/cirurgia , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/instrumentação , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Doença Aguda , Embolia/etiologia , Embolia/cirurgia , Embolia/diagnóstico por imagem , Sucção , Desenho de Equipamento , ChinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is an alternative to mesenteric bypass in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) with variable reported 30-day mortality rates. Large studies evaluating patient outcomes following ROMS are scarce. Our study aims to assess the results of this approach among patients presenting with AMI. METHODS: We reviewed all the patients with AMI who were treated with ROMS (2011-2022). Patient demographics, presentation, operative details, and outcomes were analyzed. Primary end points were in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate for 1-year mortality and primary patency loss were generated. Secondary end points included postoperative 30-day complications. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2022, ROMS was attempted on a total of 42 patients. The median age was 70 ± 15 years and the majority of patients were female. Pain out of proportion to the physical examination was the most common presenting symptom (n = 18, 42.9%) followed by peritonitis (n = 14, 33.4%). All patients underwent preoperative intravenous contrast computed tomography imaging. In situ thrombosis was identified as the etiology of AMI in 36 patients (85.7%). Technical success was achieved in 40 patients (95.2%). Conventional, non-hybrid operating rooms were used for the majority of cases. Revascularization of all 40 patients involved angioplasty and stenting of superior mesenteric artery. A single stent was placed in 35 patients (87.5%) and the reminder had more than one stent. Eighty percent of patients required bowel resection. A second-look laparotomy was required in 34 patients (85.0%). The mean operative time, including both the general surgery and vascular surgery portions of the index procedure, was 192 ± 57 minutes. Sepsis was the most common complication observed within 30 days, occurring in 8 patients (20.0%). In terms of mortality, 13 patients (32.5%) died during their index hospitalization, and 9 died (22.5%) within 30 days. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1-year overall patient survival rate was 58.6%, and the primary patency rate for stents was 51.4%. CONCLUSIONS: ROMS has an excellent technical success rate in management of AMI with lower than traditionally reported mortality rates for AMI. The dual benefits of rapid revascularization and bowel evaluation should make this surgical modality an alternative approach for treatment of AMI.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Stents , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Doença Aguda , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Circulação EsplâncnicaAssuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Choque , Vasodilatadores , Humanos , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/tratamento farmacológico , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Choque/tratamento farmacológico , Choque/fisiopatologia , Choque/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mesenteric ischemia is a severe and potentially lethal event. Assessment of intestine perfusion is eminently depending on the skills, and the experience of the surgeon. Thus, the therapy is biased by the right evaluation. Aim of this study is to determine the applicability, and the usefulness of fluorescent-imaging (FI) with indocyanine green (ICG) in a porcine model of mesenteric ischemia. Second end-point is the verification of a visual and quantitative assessment tool of the intestinal perfusion. METHODS: In 18 pigs (54,2 ±2,9kg) an occlusion of a side-branch of the mesenteric artery was performed for 3 (group I, n = 7), 6 (group II, n = 7), and 10 hours (group III, n = 4). After reperfusion a 60 minutes observation period was carried out. 3 regions of interest were defined: ischemic bowel (D1), transitional zone (D2), and non-ischemic bowel (D3). ICG-FI was performed during baseline (T0), occlusion (T1), reperfusion (T2) and after an observation period of 60 minutes (T4). RESULTS: All experiments could be finished successfully. ICG-FI was assessed using assessment of background-subtracted peak fluorescence intensity (BSFI), slope of fluorescence intensity (SFI), and a baseline adjusted ratio of both parameters. ICG-FI confirmed loss of perfusion in D1, decreased perfusion in D2, and increased perfusion in D3. After reperfusion ICG-FI increased in group 2 due to a severe tissue damage resulting in a capillary leakage. In group I ICG-FI was equal to baseline values indicating the totally reversible loss of perfusion. CONCLUSION: Using ICG-FI to estimate intestine perfusion after different durations of ischemia is viable using a porcine model of mesenteric ischemia. Even small differences in perfusion can be reliably determined by ICG-FI. Thus, ICG-FI is an encouraging method to evaluate intestine perfusion intraoperatively.
Assuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Imagem Óptica/métodos , Perfusão/métodos , Animais , Corantes , Feminino , Fluorescência , Verde de Indocianina/química , Verde de Indocianina/metabolismo , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/metabolismo , Modelos Animais , SuínosRESUMO
Type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening disease. The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing AAD has increased, and CT can provide pathophysiologic information on dissection such as intramural hematoma (IMH), longitudinal extent of dissection, and branch vessel involvement. However, the prognostic impact of these CT findings is poorly investigated. This multicenter registry included 703 patients with type A AAD. The longitudinal extent of dissection and IMH was determined on CT. Branch vessel involvement was defined as dissection extended into coronary, cerebral, and visceral arteries on CT. The evidence of malperfusion was defined based on clinical presentations. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. Of 703 patients, 126 (18%) died during hospitalization. Based on contrast-enhanced CT findings, longitudinal extent of dissection was not associated with in-hospital death, while patients with IMH had lower in-hospital mortality than those without (13% vs 22%, p = 0.004). Coronary, cerebral, and visceral artery involvement on CT was found in 6%, 55%, and 32%. In patients with coronary artery involvement, 90% had clinical coronary malperfusion, while only 25% and 21% of patients with cerebral and visceral artery involvement had clinical evidence of corresponding organ malperfusion. Multivariable analysis showed evidence of malperfusion as a significant factor associated with in-hospital mortality. In conclusions, branch vessel involvement on CT was not always associated with end-organ malperfusion in patients with type A AAD, especially in cerebral and visceral arteries. Clinical evidence of malperfusion was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality beyond branch vessel involvement on CT.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/fisiopatologia , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Transtornos da Consciência/fisiopatologia , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Vasos Coronários , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Over the decades, it has been well established that malperfusion complicates a number of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients. Of the many complications that arise from ATAAD is malperfusion, which is the result of true lumen compression secondary to the dissection, and it is one of the most dangerous complications. Left untreated, malperfusion can eventually compromise circulation to the vascular beds of almost all vital organs. Clinicians must consider the diagnosis of malperfusion promptly following a diagnosis of acute aortic dissection. The outcomes post-surgery for patients with ATAAD with concomitant malperfusion remains poor, despite mortality for aortic surgery improving over time. Optimal management for ATAAD with associated malperfusion has yet to be implemented, further research is warranted to improve the detection and management of this potentially fatal pathology. In this review, we explore the literature surrounding the complications of malperfusion in ATAAD and the various symptom presentations, investigations, and management strategies available.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Doença Aguda , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico , Dissecção Aórtica/mortalidade , Dissecção Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Aórtico/mortalidade , Aneurisma Aórtico/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidade , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Circulação Coronária , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidade , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Circulação Esplâncnica , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To report the technique of transcollateral retrograde recanalization of a superior mesenteric artery flush occlusion. METHODS: The technique of a patient undergoing transcollateral retrograde recanalization for acute symptomatic superior mesenteric artery flush occlusion was reviewed and presented. Other adjunctive methods to facilitate the endovascular treatment of the superior mesenteric artery total occlusion lesion were also compared and discussed. RESULTS: The patient was a 47-year-old woman, acute onset of symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia with flush occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery which was unable to be revascularized in a routine operation. A collateral was found to connect celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (gastroduodenal arch). The guidewire was retrograde crossed the occluded lesion via this collateral and recaptured by the catheter from the same single brachial sheath followed by balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. The patient recovered well and the symptoms completely disappeared after the procedure. CONCLUSION: The technique of retrograde recanalization through collateral pathway is an applicable alternative option for patients with superior mesenteric artery flush occlusion who have failed attempts by conventional antegrade approaches.
Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Circulação Colateral , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Circulação Esplâncnica , Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Constrição Patológica , Feminino , Humanos , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Significant physiologic perturbations can occur in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) undergoing open mesenteric bypass (OMB). These events have frequently been attributed to ischemia-reperfusion events and have been directly implicated in the occurrence of multiple organ dysfunction (MOD). Scoring systems (MOD score [MODS] and sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA]) have been derived within the critical care field to provide a composite metric for these pathophysiologic changes. The purpose of the present study was to describe the early pathophysiologic changes that occur after OMB for CMI and determine whether these are predictive of the outcomes. METHODS: Patients with CMI who had undergone elective OMB from 2002 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed. Changes in the hemodynamic, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and hematologic parameters in the first 96 hours postoperatively were analyzed. The MODSs and SOFA scores were calculated. Cox regression was used to determine the association of the MODSs and SOFA scores with the outcomes. RESULTS: The use of OMB was analyzed for 72 patients (age, 66 ± 11 years; 68% women; body mass index, 23.8 ± 6 kg/m2; 48 ± 34-lb weight loss in 59%). Previous mesenteric stent placement or bypass had been performed in 39% [stenting in 21; bypass in 8; (one patient had both)]. An antegrade configuration (93%) was most common (retrograde configuration, 7%), with revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery/celiac vessels in 85% (superior mesenteric artery only in 15%). Postoperative pathophysiologic and metabolic changes were common, and the mean MODSs and SOFA scores were 3.6 ± 2.4 (range, 1-10) and 4.0 ± 2.7 (range, 1-13), respectively. The median length of stay was 14 days (interquartile range, 9-21). The 30-day mortality was 4% (n = 3) and in-hospital morbidity was 53% (n = 38; gastrointestinal, 25%; infectious, 22%; cardiac, 18%; pulmonary, 18%; renal, 11%). The clinical follow-up period was 16 ± 20 months. The MODSs and SOFA scores correlated linearly with overall mortality (MODS: odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.7; P < .01; SOFA score: OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7; P < .01 per unit), with a score of ≥5 the inflection point most predictive of mortality (MODS: OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6-9.9; P ≤ .01; SOFA score: OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.6; P = .02). The 1- and 3-year primary bypass patency and freedom from reintervention was 91% ± 5% and 83% ± 7%, respectively, with no association with the MODSs or SOFA scores. The 1- and 3-year survival was 86% ± 4% and 71% ± 6% with significantly worse outcomes for patients with higher MODSs and/or SOFA scores. CONCLUSIONS: Most CMI patients undergoing OMB will experience significant metabolic derangements resulting from sequelae of the ischemia-reperfusion phenomenon postoperatively. These can be objectively assessed in the early postoperative period using simply applied scoring systems to reliably predict the early and long-term outcomes. A derivation of the MODS and/or SOFA score after OMB for CMI can identify the most vulnerable patients at the greatest risk of mortality.
Assuntos
Hemodinâmica , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/etiologia , Circulação Esplâncnica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Metabolismo Energético , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/diagnóstico , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/mortalidade , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadeRESUMO
Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is an uncommon, potentially underdiagnosed clinical condition. Although there is a high prevalence of mesenteric artery stenoses (MAS), an abundant collateral network in the mesenteric circulation mitigates occurrence of ischemia. The most common etiology of CMI is atherosclerosis. CMI is a clinical diagnosis, based upon typical and atypical symptoms and consistent anatomic findings. Typical symptoms of CMI are postprandial abdominal pain, unintended weight loss and food avoidance. The main modalities to diagnose MAS are duplex ultrasound, CT angiography or MR angiography, although high resolution CTA is preferred. Endovascular therapy with balloon expandable stents has become the preferred treatment for MAS.
Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Endarterectomia , Artérias Mesentéricas/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Enxerto Vascular , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Doença Crônica , Constrição Patológica , Endarterectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Artérias Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Artérias Mesentéricas/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/epidemiologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Enxerto Vascular/efeitos adversos , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite the continuing controversy of covered stents (CS) vs bare metal stents, the use of CS in mesenteric occlusive disease (MOD) has been recommended by expert centers. The aim of this study was to report midterm results with CS of the superior mesenteric artery. METHODS: Between January 2014 and October 2019, patients with MOD with a severe atheromatous stenosis or occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery treated by mesenteric CS were included. Clinical presentation included both acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), chronic mesenteric ischemia, and asymptomatic patients planned for major surgery. Demographics, procedure details, and follow-up data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Study end points included primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency. RESULTS: During the study period, 86 patients (mean age, 70 ± 9 years; 57% males) were included. Clinical presentation was AMI (n = 42 [49%]), chronic mesenteric ischemia (n = 31 [36%]), and asymptomatic (n = 13 [15%]). The technical success rate was 97%. A total of 96 stents were implanted, including 86 proximal CS (Advanta V12, n = 73; Lifestream, n = 13). The mean length and mean diameter of the CS were 31.5 ± 6.3 mm and 6.9 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Additional distal bare metal stents were used in 10 patients (12%) to overcome a kinking (n = 9) or a dissection (n = 1) downstream of the CS. All postoperative deaths occurred in patients with AMI (n = 11, 13%). During a median follow-up of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.6 ± 3.6 months), 12 patients (14%) underwent reinterventions for either stent misplacement (n = 3), stent recoil (n = 3), stent thrombosis (n = 2), de novo stenosis at the distal edge of the CS (n = 2), or gastric ischemia (n = 1). At 1 year, overall the primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 83% (95% CI, 83% ± 9%), 99% (95% CI, 99% ± 3%), and 99% (95% CI, 99% ± 3%), respectively. At 2 years, the overall primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 76% (95% CI, 76% ± 13%), 95% (95% CI, 95% ± 8%) and 95% (95% CI, 95% ± 8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric CS provide very satisfactory midterm results in patients with MOD, with an excellent primary assisted patency rate at 2 years, at the price of a significant reintervention rate.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Circulação Esplâncnica , Stents , Idoso , Constrição Patológica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularAssuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Circulação Esplâncnica , Stents , Doença Crônica , Circulação Colateral , Feminino , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) is linked to low early morbidity and mortality but a higher risk of recurrence than open repair. Mid and long term outcomes after endovascular treatment remain to be proven in larger series. The aim of this study was to assess short and mid term outcome after first line endovascular revascularisation of CMI and acute on chronic mesenteric ischaemia (AoCMI). METHODS: This was a prospective population and registry based cohort study supplemented by a retrospective review of medical records and imaging files. A national cohort was created based on data extracted from the Danish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (Karbase) for all patients treated endovascularly for CMI or AoCMI between 2011 and 2015 in Denmark. Survival data, bowel resection, complications, re-intervention rate, and improvement of clinical symptoms were analysed, as were potential risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 245 patients had an endovascular intervention for CMI (n = 178; 72.6%) and AoCMI (n = 67; 27.3%). One and three year survival estimates were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79 - 90) and 74% (95% CI 67 - 80) in the CMI-group, and 67% (95% CI 54 - 77) and 54% (95% CI 41 - 65) in the AoCMI group. The hazard ratio for death was 1.89 (95% CI 1.23 - 2.9) for AoCMI, relative to patients with CMI. Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis, rather then occlusion, significantly increased the success of SMA recanalisation: OR 19.4 (95% CI 6.2 - 61.4) and 9.3 (95% CI 1.6 - 53.6) in the CMI and AoCMI groups, respectively. The proportion of patients reporting clinical improvement was 71% (n = 127) in the CMI group and 59% (n = 39) in the AoCMI group. Five patients (3%) in the CMI and 30 (45%) in the AoCMI groups underwent bowel resection (p < .001), and the overall length of hospital stay (LoS) was a median of two days (interquartile range [IQR] 1 - 3 days) in the CMI group and seven days (IQR 3 - 23 days) in the AoCMI group. Within the first year, re-intervention was performed in 14 patients (5.7%). CONCLUSION: First line endovascular treatment of CMI carries a three year mortality rate of 25%, and low risk of re-occurrence of symptomatic ischaemia. Relative to CMI, patients suffering AoCMI have significantly higher morbidity and mortality, more bowel resections, and longer LoS.
Assuntos
Angioplastia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Idoso , Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia/instrumentação , Angioplastia/mortalidade , Doença Crônica , Dinamarca , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study sought to define duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria predicting ≥70% stenosis in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stents by correlating in-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV) with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) measurements of percent stenosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 109 patients undergoing SMA stenting between 2003 and 2018 was conducted at a single institution. Thirty-seven surveillance duplex ultrasound studies were found to have a CTA performed within 30 days of study completion. Bare metal (nâ¯=â¯20) and covered stents (nâ¯=â¯17) were included. Velocities were paired to in-stent restenosis (ISR) measured by mean vessel diameter reduction on SMA centerline reconstructions from CTA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was generated and logistic regression models for ≥70% ISR probability were used to define velocity criteria in the stented SMA. RESULTS: At a PSV of 300 cm/sec, the sensitivity is 100% and specificity 80% for a ≥70% in-stent SMA stenosis. At a PSV of 400 cm/sec, the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) is 63% and the specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) is 90%. A PSV of 450 cm/sec was consistent with the highest specificity (100%) and PPV (100%) but lower sensitivity (50%) and NPV (87.9%). One patient with a PSV of 441 cm/sec on surveillance DUS died from complications of acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: A PSV of 400 cm/sec on mesenteric DUS can predict ≥70% ISR with high sensitivity and should be considered as a diagnostic threshold for SMA in-stent restenosis.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Stents , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Doença Crônica , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recidiva , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Circulação Esplâncnica , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularAssuntos
COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Doenças do Jejuno , Jejuno , Isquemia Mesentérica , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/terapia , Dissecação , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Gangrena/etiologia , Gangrena/patologia , Humanos , Doenças do Jejuno/diagnóstico , Doenças do Jejuno/etiologia , Doenças do Jejuno/fisiopatologia , Doenças do Jejuno/cirurgia , Jejuno/irrigação sanguínea , Jejuno/diagnóstico por imagem , Jejuno/patologia , Jejuno/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/sangue , Isquemia Mesentérica/patologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/virologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Aim. The disease caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus is known predominantly for its respiratory outcomes; a subset of critically ill patients demonstrates clinically remarkable hypercoagulability in which thrombotic events range from acute pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia to extremity ischemia. Our observational study aimed to describe the incidence and characteristics, as well as clinical outcomes, of patients presenting and treated for mesenteric ischemia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods. Between March 13 and May 13, 2020, 60 patients operated for emergency reasons were analyzed, and it was noticed that 5 of the 6 COVID-positive patients were operated due to mesenteric ischemia. Results. Five of sixty patients (83.3%) applied to our emergency clinic with COVID-19 positive and acute abdomen. Two of them (40%) did not have any comorbidities. All of them (%100) were male. There were no complications and only 1 death (20%). Mean leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet levels were within the normal range, while the lymphocyte level was near the lower limit. C-Reactive Protein was above the limit in all patients. The mean levels of International Normalized Ratio, Platelet, and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time were above the limits. While D-dimer levels were close to the upper limit; fibrinogen levels were above the normal limit for each patient. Conclusion. The presence of hypercoagulation status in critical COVID-19 patients should be observed closely, and anticoagulation therapy can be considered in selected patients. More clinical data are needed to examine the role of anticoagulation in COVID-19 treatment.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Isquemia Mesentérica , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Estado Terminal , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/virologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombofilia/fisiopatologia , Trombofilia/virologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vascular calcifications have been identified as predictors of mortality in several cardiovascular diseases but have not been investigated in context of acute mesenteric ischemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vascular calcifications in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia. METHODS: Patients admitted for an acute mesenteric ischemia were retrospectively included. The presence of calcifications in the visceral aorta, the celiac trunk, the superior mesenteric artery, and the renal arteries was assessed on computed tomography scan images at the arterial phase. The calcification volumes were measured using the software Aquarius iNtuition Edition®. RESULTS: The all-cause mortality was 55 out of 86 patients (63.9%) for a median follow-up of 3.5 days (1-243). The survival rate of patients with calcification in the superior mesenteric artery was significantly lower than that of those without calcification (22% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.019). Patients who died had significantly a higher frequency of calcifications in the superior mesenteric artery, the visceral aorta, the celiac trunk, and the renal arteries. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of vascular calcifications in the superior mesenteric artery is associated with increased mortality in patients diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia. Further studies are required to identify the mechanisms underlying this association.
Assuntos
Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/patologia , Calcificação Vascular/mortalidade , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Circulação Esplâncnica , Fatores de Tempo , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of mesenteric lesions has become increasingly prevalent. Mesenteric bypass, however, remains the optimal treatment in the cases of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in young, medically fit patients given its durability. Endarterectomy has gone by the wayside, but in certain situations, this technique remains surgically relevant and should still be used. Herein, we present 2 cases of distal superior mesenteric artery (SMA) endarterectomy for mesenteric revascularization. METHODS/RESULTS: Case 1 is a 40-year-old male with history of antithrombin III deficiency, myocardial infarction, bilateral pulmonary embolism, acute aortic thrombus, and mesenteric ischemia status after placement of a proximal SMA stent and was transferred to our institution because of concern for ischemic bowel. Intraoperative angiography showed mid to distal SMA chronic thromboembolism with narrow lumen of recanalization and distal flow. No intervention was performed at that time. He developed worsening abdominal pain and weight loss over several months which required initiation of total parenteral nutrition, complicated by line-associated sepsis. Subsequent distal SMA endarterectomy was performed. He recovered well and had improved enteral intake at 1-month follow-up, and radiographic imaging at 2 months showed patent vessels. Case 2 is a 50-year-old female with extensive smoking history and hyperlipidemia and gastroesophageal reflux who presented with postprandial abdominal pain and a forty-pound weight loss over the past year. Attempted angiographic cannulation with a stent was not successful because of flush occlusion of the SMA approximately 1 centimeter distal to the ostium that was unable to be crossed. Computed tomography angiography confirmed that the SMA origin was free of atherosclerotic disease with a distal focal segment of occlusion. She underwent successful endarterectomy of this occlusion. The postoperative course was uneventful, and at 1-month follow-up, she reported continued improvement in pain and appetite. CONCLUSIONS: SMA endarterectomy can be successfully performed on mid to distal lesions of the SMA. This operation should remain a viable option in the management of CMI.