Efficacy and Tolerability of Ivabradine for Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an intractable X-linked myopathy caused by dystrophin gene mutations. Patients with DMD suffer from progressive muscle weakness, inevitable cardiomyopathy, increased heart rate (HR), and decreased blood pressure (BP). The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and tolerability of ivabradine treatment for DMD cardiomyopathy.A retrospective analysis was performed in 11 patients with DMD, who received ivabradine treatment for more than 1 year. Clinical results were analyzed before (baseline), 6 months after, and 12 months after the ivabradine administration.The initial ivabradine dose was 2.0 ± 1.2 mg/day and the final dose was 5.6 ± 4.0 mg/day. The baseline BP was 95/64 mmHg. A non-significant BP decrease to 90/57 mmHg was observed at 1 month but it recovered to 97/62 mmHg at 12 months after ivabradine administration. The baseline HR was 93 ± 6 bpm and it decreased to 74 ± 12 bpm at 6 months (P = 0.011), and to 77 ± 10 bpm at 12 months (P = 0.008). A linear correlation (y = 2.2x + 5.1) was also observed between the ivabradine dose (x mg/day) and HR decrease (y bpm). The baseline LVEF was 38 ± 12% and it significantly increased to 42 ± 9% at 6 months (P = 0.011) and to 41 ± 11% at 12 months (P = 0.038). Only 1 patient with the lowest BMI of 11.0 kg/m2 and BP of 79/58 mmHg discontinued ivabradine treatment at 6 months, while 1-year administration was well-tolerated in the other 10 patients.Ivabradine decreased HR and increased LVEF without lowering BP, suggesting it can be a treatment option for DMD cardiomyopathy.

Clinical Implications of Ivabradine in the Contemporary Era.

Ivabradine is a recently introduced inhibitor of the If ion channel, which exhibits the capacity to reduce heart rate while preserving hemodynamic stability. At present, ivabradine finds its clinical indication in patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and maintaining a relative sinus rhythm refractory to beta-blockers. To optimize heart rate control, it is recommended to pursue an aggressive up-titration of ivabradine. This approach may ameliorate tachycardia-induced hypotension by incrementally enhancing cardiac output and allow further up-titration of agents aimed at ameliorating heart failure, such as beta-blockers. Both the modulation of heart rate itself and the up-titration of agents targeting heart failure lead to cardiac reverse remodeling, consequently culminating in a subsequent reduction in mortality and morbidity. A novel overlap theory that our team proposed recently has emerged in recent times. Under trans-mitral Doppler echocardiography, the E-wave and A-wave closely juxtapose one another without any overlapping at the optimal heart rate. Employing echocardiography-guided ivabradine for heart-rate modulation to minimize the overlap between the E-wave and A-wave appears to confer substantial benefits to patients with heart failure. This approach facilitates superior cardiac reverse remodeling and yields more favorable clinical outcomes when compared to those patients who do not receive echocardiography-guided care. The next pertinent issue revolves around the potential expansion of ivabradine's clinical indications to encompass a broader spectrum of diseases. It is imperative to acknowledge that ivabradine may not yield clinically significant benefits in patients afflicted by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, acute heart failure, sepsis, or stable angina. An important fact yet to be explored is the clinical applicability of ivabradine in patients with atrial fibrillation, a concern that beckons future investigation. In this review, the concept of overlap theory it introduced, along with its application to expand the indication of ivabradine and the overlap theory-guided optimal ivabradine therapy.

The efficacy and safety of ivabradine hydrochloride in hemodialysis patients with chronic heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: There is little evidence for ivabradine hydrochloride in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: In this open-label prospective interventional trial of hemodialysis patients with chronic heart failure, during 12 weeks of treatment, changes in Heart rate (HR), frequency of dialysis-related hypotension were examined, and we investigated health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and adverse effects. RESULTS: 18 patients from 6 facilities were enrolled in the study. HR significantly decreased over time, from 87 ± 12.61/min at baseline to 75.85 ± 8.91/min (p = 0.0003), and systolic blood pressure also increased significantly (p < 0.0001). The frequency of dialysis-related hypotension was markedly reduced (p = 0.0001). The HR-QOL survey showed significant improvements in Social Functioning among others (p = 0.0178). No specific adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine hydrochloride improved dialysis-related hypotension. Furthermore, the HR-QOL improvement effect were suggested. These results demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of ivabradine hydrochloride.

Effectiveness and safety of ivabradine in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure: an observational study.

AIMS: A therapeutic strategy for chronic heart failure (HF) is to lower resting heart rate (HR). Ivabradine is a well-known HR-lowering agent, but limited prospective data exist regarding its use in Chinese patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivabradine in Chinese patients with chronic HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre, single-arm, prospective, observational study enrolled Chinese patients with chronic HF. The primary outcome was change from baseline in HR at 1 and 6 months, measured by pulse counting. Effectiveness was also evaluated using laboratory tests, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score (CSS) and overall summary score (OSS), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. A post hoc analysis examined the effectiveness and safety of ivabradine combined with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) or beta-blocker. A total of 1003 patients were enrolled [mean age 54.4 ± 15.0 years, 773 male (77.1%), mean baseline HR 88.5 ± 11.3 b.p.m., mean blood pressure 115.7/74.4 ± 17.2/12.3 mmHg, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 30.9 ± 7.6%, NYHA Classes III and IV in 48.8% and 22.0% of patients, respectively]. HR decreased by a mean of 12.9 and 16.1 b.p.m. after 1 and 6 months, respectively (both P < 0.001). At Month 6, improvements in the KCCQ CSS and OSS of ≥5 points were observed in 72.1% and 74.1% of patients, respectively (both P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased by 12.1 ± 11.6 (P < 0.001), and 66.7% of patients showed improvement in NYHA class (P < 0.001). At Month 6, the overall proportion of patients in NYHA Classes III and IV was reduced to 13.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP changed by -331.9 ng/L (-1238.6, -134.0) and -1113.8 ng/L (-2202.0, -297.2), respectively (P < 0.001). HR reductions and improvements in NYHA and KCCQ scores with ivabradine were similar with and without use of ARNIs or beta-blockers. Of 498 TEAEs in 296 patients (29.5%), 73 TEAEs in 55 patients (5.5%) were considered related to ivabradine [most frequent sinus bradycardia (n = 7) and photopsia (n = 7)]. TEAEs were reported in a similar number of patients in ARNI and beta-blocker subgroups (21.9-35.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Ivabradine treatment reduced HR and improved cardiac function and health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with chronic HF. Benefits were seen irrespective of whether or not patients were also taking ARNIs or beta-blockers. Treatment was well tolerated with a similar profile to previous ivabradine studies.

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel inhibitor in myocardial infarction: Potential benefits beyond heart rate modulation.

Myocardial infarction (MI) and its associated complications including ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure are responsible for a significant incidence of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The ensuing cardiomyocyte loss results in neurohormone-driven cardiac remodeling, which leads to chronic heart failure in MI survivors. Ivabradine is a heart rate modulation agent currently used in treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The canonical target of ivabradine is the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (HCN) in cardiac pacemaker cells. However, in post-MI hearts, HCN can also be expressed ectopically in non-pacemaker cardiomyocytes. There is an accumulation of intriguing evidence to suggest that ivabradine also possesses cardioprotective effects that are independent of heart rate reduction. This review aims to summarize and discuss the reported cardioprotective mechanisms of ivabradine beyond heart rate modulation in myocardial infarction through various molecular mechanisms including the prevention of reactive oxygen species-induced mitochondrial damage, improvement of autophagy system, modulation of intracellular calcium cycling, modification of ventricular electrophysiology, and regulation of matrix metalloproteinases.

Ivabradine Alleviates Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis-Mediated Myocardial Injury.

Ivabradine (IVA) reduces heart rate by inhibiting hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (HCNs), which play a role in the promotion of pacemaker activity in cardiac sinoatrial node cells. HCNs are highly expressed in neural and myocardial tissues and are involved in the modulation of inflammatory neuropathic pain. However, whether IVA exerts any effect on myocardial inflammation in the pathogenesis of heart failure is unclear. We employed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in porcine cardiac myosin-induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis rat model to determine the effects and mechanisms of IVA. Lewis rats (n = 32) were randomly divided into the normal, control, high-dose-IVA, and low-dose-IVA groups. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured on days 0 and 21, respectively. Echocardiography was performed on day 22, and inflammation of the myocardium was evaluated via histopathological examination. Western blot was employed to detect the expression of HCN1-4, MinK-related protein 1 (MiRP1), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), MMP-9, and transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß). Furthermore, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to measure serum IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α. The relative mRNA levels of collagen I, collagen III, and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) were determined via qRT-PCR. We found that IVA reduced the total number of cells infiltrated into the myocardium, particularly in the subset of fibroblasts, endocardia, and monocytes. IVA administration ameliorated cardiac inflammation and reduced collagen production. Results of the echocardiography indicated that left ventricular internal diameter at end-systole LVIDs increased whereas left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular fractional shortening decreased in the control group. IVA improved cardiac performance. The expression of HCN4 and MiRP1 protein and the level of serum IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α were decreased by IVA treatment. In conclusion, HCNs and the helper proteins were increased in the profile of myocardial inflammation. HCNs may be involved in the regulation of myocardial inflammation by inhibiting immune cell infiltration. Our findings can contribute to the development of IVA-based combination therapies for the future treatment of cardiac inflammation and heart failure.

Ivabradine could not decrease mitral regurgitation triggered atrial fibrosis and fibrillation compared with carvedilol.

BACKGROUND: Ivabradine, a medical treatment for heart failure (HF), reduces heart rate (HR) and prolongs diastolic perfusion time. It is frequently prescribed to patients with HF who have a suboptimal response or intolerance to beta-blockers. Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) is a valvular heart disease often associated with the development of HF and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, studies comparing the effects of ivabradine and beta-blockers on MR are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential therapeutic effects of ivabradine and carvedilol on MR using a rat model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a novel echo-guided mini-invasive surgery, MR was created in 12-weeks-old Sprague-Dawley rats. After 2 weeks, the rats were randomized to receive either ivabradine or carvedilol for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at two-week intervals. Following haemodynamic studies, postmortem tissues were analysed. Notably, the MR-induced myocardial dysfunction did not improve considerably after treatment with ivabradine or carvedilol. However, in haemodynamic studies, pharmacological therapies, particularly carvedilol, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation (end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and decreased compliance (end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05). Compared with ivabradine, a shorter duration (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and reduced inducibility (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol and MR vs. MR + Ivabradine; P < 0.05) of AF were observed in MR rats treated with carvedilol. Similarly, reduced cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis were observed in the MR rat model in the treatment groups, especially in those treated with carvedilol (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although both ivabradine and carvedilol, at least in part, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation and decreased compliance, carvedilol had a better effect on reversing MR-induced cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and arrhythmogenesis than ivabradine. When compared with Ivabradine, MR rats treated with carvedilol exhibited a shorter duration and reduced inducibility of AF, thus providing more effective suppression of HCN4. Further investigations are required to validate our findings.

Ivabradine for congenital ectopic tachycardia in newborn.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia is a rare arrhythmia that occurs in patients without previous cardiac surgery. In this report, we wanted to present a 6-hour-old newborn with congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia resistant to conventional anti-arrhythmic medications, who was successfully treated with ivabradine and amiadarone combination. CASE: A six-hour-old newborn girl was hospitalised in neonatal ICU because transient tachypnoea of the newborn. She was tachycardic, and supraventricular tachycardia was noticed. There was no answer to the adenosine esmolol treatment; even synchronised direct cardioversion intravenous amiodarone was started. Junctional ectopic tachycardia was diagnosed. We have added propranolol to the treatment and followed patient for 2 days. On the fourth day, junctional ectopic tachycardia rhythm still persisted; therefore, ivabradine treatment was added to the treatment. On the following day, the heart rhythm was slowed to 110/min, and propranolol was stopped; intravenous amiodarone treatment was changed to the oral form. The rhythm turned into sinus; two days after starting ivabradine and oral amiodarone. CONCLUSION: Tachyarrhythmia originating in the atrioventricular node and atrioventricular junction including the bundle of His complex are junctional ectopic tachycardia. Congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia is rare, and it is mostly resistant to the conventional treatment.Ivabradine is a new anti-arrhythmic agent, used extensively to decrease sinus rate in the treatment of cardiac failure. Ivabradine may be an option for the resistant congenital ectopic tachycardia.

Ivabradine for the Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Female Patients with Primarily Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

Background and Objectives: Cancer therapy containing anthracyclines is associated with cancer-treatment-related cardiac dysfunction and heart failure (HF). Conventional cardioprotective medications can be frequently complicated by their blood-pressure-lowering effect. Recently, elevated resting heart rate was shown to independently predict mortality in patients with cancer. As a heart rate-lowering drug without affecting blood pressure, ivabradine could present an alternative management of anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity. Materials and Methods: This study aimed to investigate the probable protective effects of ivabradine in cancer patients with elevated heart rate (>75 beats per minute) undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy. Patients referred by oncologists for baseline cardiovascular risk stratification before anthracycline chemotherapy who met the inclusion criteria and had no exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two strategies: ivabradine 5 mg twice a day (intervention group) or controls. Electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiogram with global longitudinal strain (GLS), troponin I (Tn I), and N-terminal natriuretic pro-peptide (NT-proBNP) were performed at baseline, after two and four cycles of chemotherapy and at six months of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the prevention of a >15% reduction in GLS. Secondary endpoints were effects of ivabradine on Tn I, NT-proBNP, left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction, right ventricle dysfunction, and myocardial work indices. Results: A total of 48 patients were enrolled in the study; 21 were randomly assigned to the ivabradine group and 27 to the control group. Reduced GLS was detected 2.9 times less often in patients receiving ivabradine than in the control group, but this change was non-significant (OR [95% CI] = 2.9 [0.544, 16.274], p = 0.208). The incidence of troponin I elevation was four times higher in the control group (OR [95% CI] = 4.0 [1.136, 14.085], p = 0.031). There was no significant change in NT-proBNP between groups, but the increase in NT-proBNP was almost 12% higher in the control group (OR [95% CI] = 1.117 [0.347, 3.594], p = 0.853). LV diastolic dysfunction was found 2.7 times more frequently in the controls (OR [95% CI] = 2.71 [0.49, 15.10], p = 0.254). Patients in the ivabradine group were less likely to be diagnosed with mild asymptomatic CTRCD during the study (p = 0.045). No differences in right ventricle function were noted. A significant difference was found between the groups in global constructive work and global work index at six months in favour of the ivabradine group (p = 0.014 and p = 0.025). Ivabradine had no adverse effects on intracardiac conduction, ventricular repolarization, or blood pressure. However, visual side effects (phosphenes) were reported in 14.3% of patients. Conclusions: Ivabradine is a safe, well-tolerated drug that has shown possible cardioprotective properties reducing the incidence of mild asymptomatic cancer-therapy-induced cardiac dysfunction, characterised by a new rise in troponin concentrations and diminished myocardial performance in anthracycline-treated women with breast cancer and increased heart rate. However, more extensive multicentre trials are needed to provide more robust evidence.

Effect of ivabradine on ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Ivabradine, a specific inhibitor of the If current in the sinoatrial node, provides heart rate reduction in sinus rhythm and angina control in chronic coronary syndromes. OBJECTIVE: The effect of ivabradine on ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction patients has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ivabradine use on life-threatening arrhythmias and long-term mortality in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 1,639 patients with heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction were included. Patients were divided into two groups: ivabradine users and nonusers. Patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia, the presence of ventricular extrasystole, and ventricular tachycardia in 24-h rhythm monitoring, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, and long-term mortality outcomes were evaluated according to ivabradine use. RESULTS: After adjustment for all possible variables, admission with ventricular tachycardia was three times higher in ivabradine nonusers (95% confidence interval 1.5-10.2). The presence of premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachycardias in 24-h rhythm Holter monitoring was notably higher in ivabradine nonusers. According to the adjusted model for all variables, 4.1 times more appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks were observed in the ivabradine nonusers than the users (95%CI 1.8-9.6). Long-term mortality did not differ between these groups after adjustment for all covariates. CONCLUSION: The use of ivabradine reduced the appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction patients. Ivabradine has potential in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction patients.

Effects of Ivabradine on Right Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cor Pulmonale.

Cor pulmonale is a clinical syndrome associated with pulmonary hypertension, frequently complicated by congestive heart failure, commonly caused by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Most patients with cor pulmonale have tachycardia. However, heart rate (HR) reduction represents a primary treatment goal to improve the survival and quality of life in these patients. Ivabradine can selectively slow HR at rest and during exercise. In this prospective study, we tested the hemodynamic effects, invasively determined using right-sided cardiac catheterization, of reducing HR with ivabradine. We selected 18 patients (13 men [72.2%], mean age 67 ± 10 years) with COPD and cor pulmonale, presenting with sinus tachycardia. All patients performed clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram, spirometry, echocardiogram, 6-minute walking distance, and right-sided cardiac catheterization within 1 month of enrollment. All tests were repeated after 6 months of ivabradine treatment (median assumed dose 11.9 mg/die). We noticed a significant decrease of HR (from 98 ± 7 to 77 ± 8 beats/min, p = 0.0001), with a concomitant reduction of the congestion index (from 25.9 ± 5.1 to 19.4 ± 5.7 mm Hg, p = 0.001), and the consequent improvement of the right ventricular systolic performance (right ventricular stroke volume augmented from 56.7 ± 7.9 to 75.2 ± 8.6 ml/beat, p = 0.0001). This allows an improvement in clinical status and exercise tolerance (Borg scale score decreased from 5.2 ± 1.4 to 4.1 ± 1.3, p = 0.01 and the 6-minute walking distance increased to 252 ± 65 to 377 ± 59 m, p = 0.001). In conclusion, HR reduction significantly improves hemodynamic and clinical status of patients with tachycardia affected by COPD and cor pulmonale.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Drugs for the Treatment of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: At present, the therapies of dilated cardiomyopathy concentrated on the symptoms of heart failure and related complications. The study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combination of various conventional and adjuvant drugs in treating dilated cardiomyopathy via network meta-analysis. METHODS: The study was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. From inception through 27 June 2022, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on medicines for treating dilated cardiomyopathy. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias assessment. R4.1.3 and Revman5.3 software were used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 52 randomized controlled trials in this study, with a total of 25 medications and a sample size of 3048 cases. The network meta-analysis found that carvedilol, verapamil, and trimetazidine were the top three medicines for improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Ivabradine, bucindolol, and verapamil were the top 3 drugs for improving left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). Ivabradine, L-thyroxine, and atorvastatin were the top 3 drugs for improving left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD). Trimetazidine, pentoxifylline, and bucindolol were the top 3 drugs for improving the New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) cardiac function score. Ivabradine, carvedilol, and bucindolol were the top 3 drugs for reducing heart rate (HR). CONCLUSION: A combination of different medications and conventional therapy may increase the clinical effectiveness of treating dilated cardiomyopathy. Beta-blockers, especially carvedilol, can improve ventricular remodeling, cardiac function, and clinical efficacy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Hence, they can be used if patients tolerate them. If LVEF and HR do not meet the standard, ivabradine can also be used in combination with other treatments. However, since the quality and number of studies in our research were limited, large sample size, multi-center, and high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to corroborate our findings.

Effect of preoperative ivabradine on hemodynamics during elective off-pump CABG.

Background: Ivabradine is a specific heart rate (HR)-lowering agent which blocks the cardiac pacemaker If channels. It reduces the HR without causing a negative inotropic or lusitropic effect, thus preserving ventricular contractility. The authors hypothesized that its usefulness in lowering HR can be utilized in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Objective: To study the effects of preoperative ivabradine on hemodynamics (during surgery) in patients undergoing elective OPCAB surgery. Methods: Fifty patients, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I and II, were randomized into group I (control, n = 25) and group II (ivabradine group, n = 25). In group I, patients received the usual anti-anginal medications in the preoperative period, as per the institutional protocol. In group II, patients received ivabradine 5 mg twice daily for 3 days before surgery, in addition to the usual anti-anginal medications. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, thiopentone sodium, and pancuronium bromide as a muscle relaxant and maintained with fentanyl, midazolam, pancuronium bromide, and isoflurane. The hemodynamic parameters [HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP)] and pulmonary artery (PA) catheter-derived data were recorded at the baseline (before induction), 3 min after the induction of anesthesia at 1 min and 3 min after intubation and at 5 min and 30 min after protamine administration. Intraoperatively, hemodynamic data (HR and MAP) were recorded every 10 min, except during distal anastomosis of the coronary arteries when it was recorded every 5 min. Post-operatively, at 24 hours, the levels of troponin T and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured. This trial's CTRI registration number is CTRI/005858. Results: The HR in group II was lower when compared to group I (range 59.6-72.4 beats/min and 65.8-80.2 beats/min, respectively) throughout the study period. MAP was comparable [range (78.5-87.8 mm Hg) vs. (78.9-88.5 mm Hg) in group II vs. group I, respectively] throughout the study period. Intraoperatively, 5 patients received metoprolol in group I to control the HR, whereas none of the patients in group II required metoprolol. The incidence of preoperative bradycardia (HR <60 beats/min) was higher in group II (20%) vs. group I (8%). There was no difference in both the groups in terms of troponin T and BNP level after 24 hours, time to extubation, requirement of inotropes, incidence of arrhythmias, in-hospital morbidity, and 30-day mortality. Conclusion: Ivabradine can be safely used along with other anti-anginal agents during the preoperative period in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. It helps to maintain a lower HR during surgery and reduces the need for beta-blockers in the intraoperative period, a desirable and beneficial effect in situations where the use of beta-blockers may be potentially harmful. Further studies are needed to evaluate the beneficial effects of perioperative Ivabradine in patients with moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction.