Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Burns ; 46(2): 441-446, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31455546

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intentional burn injury outcomes are usually more severe, have a high mortality and are seen more often in low and middle-income countries. This study will examine the epidemiological characteristics of intentional burn injury patients and mortality outcomes at a regional Burn Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 11,977 patients admitted to a regional Burn center from 2002 to 2015.Variables analyzed were basic demographics (sex, age, and race), total body surface area of burn (%TBSA), presence of inhalation injury, Charlson comorbidity index, intent of injury, mortality, and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Chi-square tests, bivariate analysis and logistic regression models were utilized to determine the effect of burn intent on outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven thousand eight hundred and twenty-three (n = 11,823) adult and pediatric patients from 2002 to 2015 were included in the study. Three hundred and forty-eight (n = 348, 2.9%) patients had intentional burn injuries (IBI). Patients with IBI were younger, 26.5 ± 20 years compared to the non-intentional burn injury (NIBI) group (32 ± 22 years, p < 0.001). Mean %TBSA was significantly higher in the IBI vs. NIBI group at 14.6 ± 20 vs. 6.4 ± 10%, p < 0.001, respectively. Overall, Non-whites (n = 230, 66%) were more likely to have IBI, p < 0.001. Inhalation injury and mortality were statistically significant in the IBI group compared to the NIBI group, (n = 54,16%) vs. (n = 30, 9%) and (n = 649,6%) vs. (n = 329,2.9%), p < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression did not show any significant increase in odds of mortality based on burn intent. In subgroup analysis of self-inflicted (SIB) vs. assault burns, SIB patients were significantly older, 38 years (±14.7) vs. 22.4 years (±20.5), p < 0.001 and had a higher %TBSA, 26.5 (±29.6) vs. 10.3 (±13.6), p < 0.001. Seventy three percent (n = 187, 73%) of assault burn patients were Nonwhite and Whites were more likely to incur self-inflicted burns, (n = 53% p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We show that patients with intentional burn injuries have an associated increased %TBSA and inhalation injury without increased adjusted odds for mortality. Intentional burns increase health care expenditures. Violence prevention initiatives and access to mental health providers may be beneficial in reducing intentional burn injury burden.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Maus-Tratos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Violência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Superfície Corporal , Unidades de Queimados , Queimaduras/etnologia , Queimaduras/mortalidade , Queimaduras/patologia , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/etnologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Piromania , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/etnologia , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/epidemiologia , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/etnologia , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/mortalidade , Violência/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rev Mal Respir ; 29(3): 398-403, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22440304

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Fires of wood and charcoal play an essential part in the cooking of food in Africa. These fires emit thick smoke that has definite health consequences. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical manifestations related to kitchen smoke and to identify the type of fire most often incriminated. METHODS: It was a transverse study comparing the clinical features in women using three types of fire: wood, charcoal and gas. We questioned 200 women in each group who used one type of fire exclusively for five days a week for at least five years. RESULTS: Clinical manifestations associated with the smoke were reported in all the women using wood as opposed to 98.5% using charcoal and 45.5% using gas. More than 80% had physical signs. These comprised 89.1% upper respiratory and 77% pulmonary signs. Upper respiratory signs were the most common, mainly sneezing and nasal obstruction. At the pulmonary level, a predominance of signs was found in women using wood fires (47.3%) and charcoal (36.2%), the difference being statistically significant. The signs included chronic cough, chest pain and dyspnoea. Wheezes were found in 15% of the women. CONCLUSION: Cooking smoke exposes women to complications which are most frequently associated with the use of wood or charcoal.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , População Negra , Culinária , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/epidemiologia , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , África/epidemiologia , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/estatística & dados numéricos , Biomassa , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Carvão Vegetal , Culinária/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/etnologia , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/etnologia , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/etiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Mulheres , Madeira
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA